Variance drain, also called volatility drag,^{[note 1]} operates under the theory that between two portfolios with the same beginning and same average return, the one with the greater variance will have a lower compound return and lessending wealth.^{[1]}
In statistics, a fund's risk is characterized by the variation (volatility) of its return. If we measured the deviations compared to the average return over time, the positive and negative deviations will tend to cancel each other out. By squaring the deviations, the numbers always remain positive when they are summed. This averaging of the sum of the squared deviations is known as the variance.^{[2]}
Arithmetic versus geometric returns
Returns over time are calculated as follows:
First, by an arithmetic average of the returns. This is the simple sum of returns divided by the number of periods.
Second, by a geometric return. The returns are compounded over a period of time, which is measured by the starting and ending values of the investment.
For example, a stock is purchased for $100. At the end of the first year, its price is $200 (100% gain)^{[3]} In the second year, the stock price drops to $100 (50% loss).
 The Arithmetic return over 2 years is 25% = (100%  50%) / 2
 The Geometric return over 2 years is is 0% = $100 (final value)  $100 (starting value)
In mathematics, the inequality of arithmetic and geometric means, or more briefly the AM–GM inequality, the arithmetic mean is always greater than the geometric mean unless the numbers are identical.^{[4]} In terms of investing, this inequality can be restated as: A return which has some risk (volatility) will generate lower returns than the arithmetic return.
Variance drain
The arithmetic mean  geometric mean inequality was utilized in a 1995 paper titled "Variance Drain  Is your return leaking down the variance drain?"^{[5]} "Drain" refers to active managers who generate a variance in excess of a passive alternative. Active managers needed to cover not only their fees and transaction costs, but the cost of the "drain" due to the variance.^{[2]}
Some authors have observed that the more variable a given asset's return is, the greater the difference between the arithmetic and geometric averages. One popular approximation:
 $r_{g}\approx r_{a}{\frac {1}{2}}\sigma ^{2}$
 where r_{g} = geometric return, r_{a} = arithmetic return, $\sigma ^{2}$ = its variance
 ${\mbox{Variance Drain}}=r_{a}r_{g}\approx {\frac {\sigma ^{2}}{2}}$
These expressions suggest that the variance of returns drains the arithmetic average returns to produce the smaller, realized, compound returns over the holding period.^{[6]}
In the above example, the Variance Drain is 25 % = 25% (arithmetic average)  0% (geometric average).
See also
Notes
 ↑ Variance drain is also known as volatility drag. See: ASOP No. 27 Request for Comments, Selecting a BestEstimate Range
References
 ↑ Managing Risk Vs. Picking Investment Winners, Oklahoma Society of CPAs, 2004.
 ↑ ^{2.0} ^{2.1} The New Wealth Management: The Financial Advisors Guide to Managing and Investing Client Assets, Google eBook, Chapter 7 (free preview)
 ↑ Re: Threefund portfolio returns and variance drain, forum discussion, direct link to post.
 ↑ Inequality of arithmetic and geometric means, on Wikipedia.
 ↑ Thomas E Messmore, Variance Drain: The Journal of Portfolio Management, The Journal of Portfolio Management Summer 1995, Vol. 21, No. 4: pp. 104110, DOI: 10.3905/jpm.1995.409536 (enable cookies to view, subscription required)
 ↑ The Variance Drain and Jensen's Inequality (March 19, 2012). CAEPR Working Paper No. 2012004. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=202747
External links
 Gregory Curtis, The Stewardship of Wealth: Successful Private Wealth Management for Investors and Their Advisors, Google eBook, Part 2 (free preview), 2012, ISBN 1118420152
 Harold Evensky, CFP, Stephen M. Horan, Thomas R. Robinson, The New Wealth Management: The Financial Advisors Guide to Managing and Investing Client Assets, Google eBook, Chapter 7 (free preview), 2011, ISBN 1118036913
 Variance Drain  IFCI Risk Institute (IFCI Foundation  International Financial Risk Institute)
 Philip Martin McCaulay, Expected Geometric Returns, Society of Actuaries, Pension Section News, Issue 89, May 2016, Viewed May 31, 2017.
 W. Scott Simon, CFP Managing Risk Vs. Picking Investment Winners, Oklahoma Society of CPAs, 2004.
 Hans Wagner, CAGR vs. Average Annual Return: Why Your Advisor Is Quoting the Wrong Number, InvestingAnswers, 2016(?), Viewed May 31, 2017.
Forum discussions


 
 Becker, Robert A., The Variance Drain and Jensen's Inequality (March 19, 2012). CAEPR Working Paper No. 2012004. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2027471 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2027471
 Martin McCaulay, FSA, EA, MAAA, ASOP No. 27 Request for Comments, Selecting a BestEstimate Range, March 31, 2008.
 Thomas E Messmore, Variance Drain: The Journal of Portfolio Management, The Journal of Portfolio Management Summer 1995, Vol. 21, No. 4: pp. 104110, DOI: 10.3905/jpm.1995.409536 (enable cookies to view, subscription required).




 

 Becker, Robert A., The Variance Drain and Jensen's Inequality (March 19, 2012). CAEPR Working Paper No. 2012004. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2027471 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2027471
 Martin McCaulay, FSA, EA, MAAA, ASOP No. 27 Request for Comments, Selecting a BestEstimate Range, March 31, 2008.
 Thomas E Messmore, Variance Drain: The Journal of Portfolio Management, The Journal of Portfolio Management Summer 1995, Vol. 21, No. 4: pp. 104110, DOI: 10.3905/jpm.1995.409536 (enable cookies to view, subscription required).


Statistics 

  Statistical concepts  

 Stock fund tracking error  

 Bond fund tracking error  

 US index returns  

 Global index returns  


Statistics 

 Statistical concepts 

   Stock fund tracking error 

   Bond fund tracking error 

   US index returns 

   Global index returns 

 



  Financial models  

 Securities  

 Performance  

 Finance  




 Financial models 

   Securities 

   Performance 

   Finance 

 
