Substantially equal periodic payments
One way an investor can take withdrawals from a traditional IRA before the age of 59 1/2 without triggering the 10% early withdrawal penalty tax is to initiate a program of Substantially Equal Periodic Payments (SEPP). These penalty free payments are allowed under the Internal Revenue Code sections 72(t) and 72(q).
The IRS allows payments to be calculated according to three approved methods.[1] Once started, you must continue the payments for the greater of either five years and a day, or until you reach the age of 59 1/2, the age at which IRA withdrawals can usually avoid the early withdrawal penalty tax.[2] You choose whether the payments from the IRA are monthly, quarterly, or annually.[3] If you fail to maintain payments, or their periodicity, the IRS imposes a 10% penalty tax for early withdrawals on all prior withdrawals.[4] In addition, once you have started an SEPP program for an IRA, a lump sum withdrawal from the IRA before the tenure requirements have been met (age 59 and 1/2 or five years and a day) will trigger the penalty tax. As a result, if you establish an SEPP at age 57, any lump sum withdrawals from the SEPP IRA before age 62 will trigger the penalty tax, even if it occurs after age 59 and 1/2.[5]
The solution to this problem is to establish a single or multiple SEPP IRA program on a portion of your IRAs, leaving some of your IRAs out of the program. If the IRA custodian does not enter code "2" ("Early distribution, exception applies") on the 1099-R form you will receive each year, you will need to file your SEPP withdrawals on IRS Form 5329 when you prepare your tax return.[6]
Approved withdrawal methods
The IRS approves three withdrawal methods for SEPPs:
- Required minimum distribution method - The required minimum distribution method consists of an account balance and a life expectancy factor (single life, or uniform life, or joint life and last survivor, each using the age(s) reached in the year for which distributions are calculated). The annual payment is redetermined for each year. The RMD method produces a variable income distribution as the market value of the IRA portfolio fluctuates and as the life expectancy factor changes. In general, the single life table produces higher income withdrawals than does the joint life or uniform tables.
- Fixed amortization method - The fixed amortization method consists of an account balance amortized over a specified number of years equal to life expectancy (single life or uniform life or joint life and last survivor) and a rate of interest that is not more than 120 percent of the federal mid-term rate published in revenue rulings by the Service. Once an annual distribution amount is calculated under this fixed method, the same dollar amount must be distributed under this method in subsequent years. In general, the single life table produces higher income withdrawals than does the joint life or uniform tables.
- Fixed annuitization method - The fixed annuitization method consists of an account balance, an annuity factor, and an annual payment. The age annuity factor is calculated based on the mortality table in Appendix B of Rev. Rul. 2002-62 and a rate of interest that is not more than 120 percent of the federal mid-term rate published in revenue rulings by the Service. Once an annual distribution amount is calculated under this fixed method, the same dollar amount must be distributed under this method in subsequent years.[7]
As a general rule, the fixed amortization and the fixed annuitization methods produce much higher income streams than does the required minimum distribution method. This can lead to you emptying your IRA account more quickly during bear markets. Rev. Rul. 2002-62 allows an investor using either the amortization or annuitization methods to make a one-time change to the required minimum distribution method, which usually provides for lower payouts. Once elected, you must make all subsequent annual withdrawals under required minimum distributions.[8]
According to Natalie Choate, the author of Life and Death Planning for Retirement Benefits, 6th Edition, 2006, people wanting greater flexibility and control over the size of RMD income payments, at the cost of greater complexity and risk, will tend to choose the joint life and last survivor table; while people wanting maximum stability of income unaffected by beneficiary changes will choose either the Uniform or Single Life table. She also mentions that the IRS has allowed SEPP participants to annually recalculate the annuitization or amortization method. You can however only do this by applying for a private ruling from the IRS.[9]
Account balance
The IRS has some flexibility in fixing the anniversary date for determining the IRA account balance. The balance can be set any time from December 31 of the year prior to creating the program up to the date of the first distribution. Once you have established it, the same valuation date is used, when necessary, for determining withdrawals. The same flexibility for determining the valuation date applies when you elect the one time change of computing method to the RMD calculation.
An important detail to remember is that the anniversary date determines the five year SEPP tenure requirement if you are withdrawing on a schedule that uses this payout period. You cannot make unsanctioned modifications in the SEPP without penalty for five years and one day starting from the anniversary date.[10]
IRA selection for an SEPP program
You can create an SEPP program on all of your IRAs; on some of your IRAs, leaving the remaining IRAs out of the program; or on a single IRA. Once started, you cannot move funds from outside the SEPP IRA(s) into the SEPP, nor can you take funds, other than the required annual distribution, out of the SEPP. If you are holding multiple funds in the SEPP you can make transfer exchanges between the funds without penalty, and you can also transfer the IRA(s) to another provider without penalty.[11]
Changes considered modification of the program
The IRS treats the following acts as modification of the SEPP, triggering penalty taxes:
- Stopping the payments;
- Taking extra payment;
- Changing the "period" of periodic payments;
- Additions to the account; transfers into, out of, the account;
- Changing how the payments in the series are determined.[12]
Using an SEPP for charitable donations
If are wealthy enough, are under the age of 59 and 1/2, and want to make charitable donations with retirement plan funds, establishing an SEPP program in order to donate IRA funds to a charity is a valid option.[13]
References
- ↑ Natalie Choate (2006). Life and Death Planning for Retirement Benefits (6th ed.). p. 462. ISBN 978-0-9649440-7-7.
- ↑ Choate 2006, p. 457.
- ↑ Choate 2006, p. 460.
- ↑ Choate 2006, p. 478.
- ↑ Choate 2006, p. 477.
- ↑ Choate 2006, p. 470-471.
- ↑ Choate 2006, p. 461-463.
- ↑ Choate 2006, p. 475.
- ↑ Choate 2006, p. 464.
- ↑ Choate 2006, p. 468-469.
- ↑ Choate 2006, p. 469-470.
- ↑ Choate 2006, p. 477-478.
- ↑ Choate 2006, p. 389.
External links
- Taking Substantially Equal Periodic Payments - Vanguard Retirement Resource Center. Archived from the original on January 17, 2019.
- 72t on the Net
- IRS: Retirement Plans FAQs regarding Revenue Ruling 2002-62
- Natalie Choate About Life and Death Planning for Retirement Benefits