Dollar cost averaging

From Bogleheads
(Redirected from Lump sum vs DCA)
Jump to: navigation, search

The origin of the term Dollar cost averaging (DCA) is the distinction between a practice of buying a fixed number of shares every period and a practice of investing a fixed dollar amount every period. Over time the meaning has been extended.

DCA is the technique of dividing an available investment lump sum into equal parts, and then periodically investing each part. This DCA is proposed as an alternative to lump sum investing (LSI), which is to make the entire investment immediately. As such DCA is a technique to overcome fear in investing by mitigating the risk of loss over the short term.

For any sequence of constant-dollar purchases[1] of an asset whose price fluctuates, more shares will be purchased when prices are lower than when prices are high.[2] As a result, the average cost per share will be lower than the average price per share over the same period. This consequence of DCA is used as an argument to persuade investors to make systematic, periodic fixed dollar amount investments regardless of market prices.

The term DCA is used to describe similar investment concepts such as periodic automatic investment (almost universally utilized by individual investors to fund retirement accounts out of earned income).

Variants on the idea of DCA include "reverse dollar cost averaging" which pertains to periodic automatic withdrawals made during retirement.[3] Also, Value Averaging closely resembles dollar cost averaging but differs in that the investor selects a target growth rate or amount on his or her asset base or portfolio each period, and then adjusts the next period's contribution according to the relative gain or shortfall made on the original asset base.[4]

Dollar cost averaging versus lump sum

When you are ready to invest money, a common question is whether you should invest it as a lump sum or Dollar Cost Average (DCA) by splitting your investment across several payments. The answer depends on the degree to which you are willing to accept lower expected returns in exchange for lower potential losses (aversion to possible loss).

In most cases, you are moving your money from cash (or the equivalent, a low-yielding money market) to some mix of stocks and bonds. The expected return of both stocks and bonds are higher than cash. However, their volatility is higher as well. The risk is that just after making your investment, the market could crash, causing your investment to quickly lose value due to the unfortunate timing of your purchase.

Of course, according to Bogleheads Investment Philosophy, you should only be investing in the first place into a diversified asset allocation. Also, you should only be holding volatile funds like stocks and bonds if your investing horizon is long enough to ride out their volatility.

Lump sum investing will always carries a higher expected return, because it immediately moves your funds from asset classes with lower expected returns to ones with higher expected returns. Note that higher expected returns do not guarantee that your actual returns will be higher. According to an investopedia article,[5] studies indicate that lump sum investing has produced higher returns 66% of the time.

Some investors are willing to sacrifice some expected return in order to reduce their potential loss, knowing that higher expected return come with higher potential loss. For those investors, dollar cost averaging is superior because it reduces the chances of investing just prior to a market drop. If you instead decide to invest 1/6th of the money each month for 6 months, you will reduce the chance of buying just before a crash. Instead, as the price fluctuates each month, you will buy more shares when the price is low and less when it is high. In such volatile markets your real return can be higher then the normally expected return.

Many new investors are more interested in minimizing their potential loss, and it's important that an ill-timed market drop not scare them off from investing in the future. Many experienced investors are more interested in maximizing their expected returns. You can also decide to split the difference, where you invest half immediately and the other half over 6 or so months.


Most no-load mutual funds allow small, regular investments with no fees. However, most investors pay a commission to purchase a load-fund or an ETF. Depending on the size of the commission and the investment, DCAing into a load-fund or an ETF could be far more expensive than purchasing as a lump sum. For ETFs, the bid/ask spread is the same between DCA and lump sum.

Automatic investment

Most investors make regular contributions through their 401(k) plans or by having a set amount auto-deducted from their bank account into an IRA or taxable account. When this money is automatically invested, it has the same benefit of dollar cost averaging that you buy more shares when prices are low and less when they are high. However, this form of investing is not dollar cost averaging. It is called periodic investing. The difference is that periodic investing is maximizing expected return, because you are investing the money as soon as you have it. DCA applies when you have the money to invest, but delay doing so.

Switching to a more conservative portfolio

Some investors who are new to a Bogleheads Investment Philosophy may find their portfolios contain too much equity. Even worse, some investors have a large portion of their net worth held in a single stock, such as through an employee purchase plan. They generally want to sell some of their equities and buy bonds. In these cases where an investor wants to move from high risk and volatility assets to lower risk and volatility assets, a lump sum transaction makes more sense than DCA. That's because lump sum both immediately moves to the expected return and volatility the investor wants, while also minimizing potential regret.

Reverse dollar cost averaging

Investors who regularly add to their investment portfolios with periodic investing purchase more shares when prices are low and less shares when prices are high. Author Henry K. Hebeler[6] points out that investors periodically distributing retirement income from their portfolios experience the reverse action, redeeming more shares when prices are low and less shares when prices are high. Hebeler terms this process, "reverse dollar cost averaging" with results that should, on average, reduce expected returns. Examining rolling 20 year investment periods from 1927 to 1995 for a portfolio consisting of 50% large cap stocks (S&P 500); 40% long term corporate bonds; and 10% treasury bills, with expense loadings of 1.50% for stocks; 0.50% for bonds; and 0.30% for cash), Hebeler provides average real returns for four scenarios: the portfolio; the accumulating investor; the distributing investor; as well as the results of 80% percentile returns (reflecting desires for portfolio survivability for retirement distributions). One should also note that indexing the portfolios would add 0.70% to each portfolio's returns simply due to reduced costs.[7]

Average Real Returns (rolling 20 years) 1927-1995
Portfolio return
50% stock/40% bond/10% cash
Accumulating investor Distributing investor
Portfolio 2.9% 3.2% 2.6%
80 percentile 1.2% 0.8% 0.3%

See also


External links