Category talk:Pages not intended for non-US investors

Category name is misleading, it depends on the investors citizenship and country of residence.
With the revamp of the template US to provide different levels of how non-US investors should treat articles, this category name needs probably needs a rethink. Many of these pages absolutely are applicable to Canadian investors and possibly other non-US investors where tax treaties exist between the country and the US. --Peculiar Investor 23:50, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks to the arcane complexity of US tax laws, the accurate name for this category is perhaps:
 * Pages parts of which may not be applicable to non-US investors who live in countries without a US estate tax treaty or where their US estate tax is deficient so South Africa or Ireland if they hold more than $60,000 in US situs assets otherwise not applicable to non-US investors who live in countries without US income tax treaty except for US citizens and green card holders living outside the US
 * ... or something like that! The problem is that there are multiple categories of "non-US" people, where "non-US" is defined as "not a US tax resident". Probably along the lines of:
 * US nonresident aliens
 * Investors resident in countries with US income tax treaties
 * Investors domiciled in countries with US estate tax treaties, excluding South Africa and Ireland
 * Investors domiciled in countries without a usable US estate tax treaty
 * Investors resident in countries without US tax treaties
 * US expats (US citizens and US green card holders living outside the US)
 * The chart in Non-US investor's guide to navigating US tax traps shows how these groupings fall out.
 * More feasibly, it may be useful to categorise pages by which reason they pass to US, rather than by simple use of US. Even then, some parts of some pages marked by this template may apply to one or more of the above listed groups of people, and some parts may not, so this tells us something about the page, but not everything about it.
 * The wiki grew -- and continues to grow -- organically and in a purely/predominantly US context. And pages often (usually) contain elements that apply to a mixture of these investor groups. Taken together, or even individually, these mean that separating out the strands for accurate categorisation is an impractical ideal. --TedSwippet 10:15, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
 * As a quick fix, would changing the category name to "Pages not intended for non-US investors" be adequate? --TedSwippet 06:23, 10 February 2021 (EST)