Talk:Marginal tax rate

A summary from various sources, references listed. I'd like a 2nd opinion to check for errors or omissions (or "OK"). LadyGeek 19:18, 6 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Looks fine to me. I like the google:define touch also. It might be a good idea to add one these to all glossary entries. Blbarnitz 21:47, 6 February 2009 (UTC)


 * What are you referring to when you say, "a flat tax has a marginal rate of zero"? A flat rate tax has a constant marginal rate, not zero; a tax with a marginal rate of zero is a fixed-amount tax, such as a tax of $100 on every house rather than a percentage of the value of the house.Grabiner 04:37, 7 February 2009 (UTC)


 * David, I went ahead and substituted your wording. I think we've nailed it. Blbarnitz 09:02, 7 February 2009 (UTC)


 * David, Barry - That's why I asked for a review. My bad. I took the last sentence of the Wikipedia section for Marginal and removed the word "poll" from "poll tax". Original wording was "A flat rate poll tax has a marginal rate of zero,...". I didn't realize this was an error. The house tax example above clearly explains what I did wrong and is now on the main page. LadyGeek 19:34, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

Marginal Tax Rate Calculations
Could you please show how you got the marginal tax rates of of 27.75% and 46.25% (with explanation)? I couldn't reproduce these results, so I'm missing something. Also, it might help to say "each additional $1" instead of "each $1" to be clear that this is marginal.
 * If you are in the range in which Social Security becomes taxable, each $1 of income causes an extra 50 or 85 cents of Social Security to be taxable at the same tax rate, until 85% of the whole benefit is taxable. If you are in the 15% bracket and each $1 causes 85 cents to be taxable, your marginal tax rate is 27.75% ; if you are in the 25% bracket at each $1 causes 85 cents to be taxable, your marginal tax rate is 46.25%

LadyGeek 16:43, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
 * If you earn an extra $100 and each $1 causes 85 cents to be taxable, your taxable income increases by $185, and in a 15% tax bracket, you pay $27.75 tax on that $185. Thus the marginal tax rate is 27.75%.  A clarification will be added.Grabiner 00:33, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The example is now computed in detail at Taxation of Social Security benefits.Grabiner 01:13, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Now I understand, thanks. LadyGeek 22:13, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

Why is the statement below important for a marginal tax rate? Is it because corporate and municipal bonds are not taxable and therefore the after-tax rate is the same as before-tax rates?
 * "If your marginal federal tax rate is 25%, then a corporate bond fund with a 4% yield and a municipal bond fund with a 3% yield have the same after-tax value to you."

LadyGeek 22:13, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

Reader feedback: Please give a real example, ...
24.254.55.6 posted this comment on 1 March 2014 (view all feedback).

"Please give a real example, such as: The social security statement says when I retire next year (early retirement) I will start collecting social security of $1,923. My other income (State retirement income) will $2,200 per month. What will my social security tax be? Thanks"

Any thoughts?

Blbarnitz 03:13, 2 March 2014 (CST)

The reader may be wishing to have an example which matches his/her situation. Using Social Security presents a more difficult problem and is better addressed in Taxation of Social Security benefits.

The examples currently shown intentionally do not go into any detail because tax law complexities arise. At a detailed level, we may provide advice based on incomplete information and risk giving an incorrect (or misinterpreted) answer. For the purposes of a simple illustration, I believe the existing examples are sufficient. --LadyGeek 14:50, 2 March 2014 (CST)

Reader feedback: This page needs better elabo...
204.99.118.14 posted this comment on 10 October 2017 (view all feedback).

"This page needs better elaboration in the Traditional vs. Roth section. The examples are not clear."

Any thoughts?

Peculiar Investor 10:27, 13 October 2017 (EDT)

It's too bad the commenter didn't give more specifics about what isn't clear.

Perhaps some of the differential calculus is also more confusing than helpful. For most personal finance purposes, stopping at the "delta" equation is better than moving to the partial or full derivative forms. That's what the second sentence of this wiki uses.

--FiveK 00:20, 19 October 2017 (EDT)


 * There may also be an assumption that the reader is familiar with the concepts behind the IRAs. I agree to leave the page content as-is. --LadyGeek 06:43, 19 October 2017 (EDT)