Talk:Budget models of retirement spending

Article Abstract
--ThePrune 16:58, 2 September 2011 (EDT) Notice my peculiar use of the expression "referred to in this article as...". What I am trying to indicate is that certain budget type designations (specifically,. Current Spending budget, Bottom-up budget, Step Change budget and Flexible Spending budget) are original to this article. I have attempted to create a classification scheme by which many fundamentally similar budget models can be grouped together. In my opinion, this helps clarify relationships among them. Before sitting down to write this article, I had always thought of them as "20 to 30 different approaches". Now I can see the common features. I want the reader to also be able to see these commonalities.

That said, I am sensitive to the requirement of keeping original work out of Wiki articles. Yet I have been unable to find any outside articles that categorize these now (to me!) obvious similarities. When writing review articles as a professional engineer, this sort of new designation creation would have been perfectly acceptable. I'd be interested to hear if others think I have unacceptably violated the "No Original Work" rule. If so, what might be done about it?


 * The Wikipedia policy of No original research is defined as material—such as facts, allegations, and ideas—for which no reliable, published source exists. I don't think this is any different than an instructor who writes his own textbook and organizes the chapter material as he sees fit. The section headings are uniquely titled by the author, but the content uses equations and material that has been taught for years. You are not modifying the budget models themselves, just applying them for your intended purpose. The budgets are verifiable sources, which is not original research.
 * --LadyGeek 19:54, 2 September 2011 (EDT)

Bottom-up approach (Worksheets)
--ThePrune 20:01, 26 August 2011 (EDT) I feel it's important to include links to 3 types of budgeting documents:  Paper format, Internet, and Downloadable spreadsheet. I've given a few links, and I really wouldn't want to give more than 3 links in each category. But I'm not really sure that I've found the best examples of each. (But I am partial to the Excel file Simple Budget Worksheets since it's what I use in the retiremet classes I teach). I'd appreciate it if other would post links to their favorite budgeting documents so that the Wiki community can select the very best ones for the article.

The wiki is not the right vehicle for poll taking; that's for the forum. You'll never get agreement on what "best" really means, as everyone uses what they are comfortable with. The intent is to teach the concepts, not worksheet mechanics. If I like the paper example better, I'll enter it into Excel (or LibreOffice / OpenOffice, the free alternatives). I would just use what you are comfortable with; the student can always choose something different after the course is over.

Giving too many choices (8 shown here) can be confusing to the student. Only four budgets have explanations (is good for infrequent purchases, etc.).

The Standard & Poor budget is a calculator, not a budget. I would delete it, explain why, or move it to the External links section.--LadyGeek 21:23, 26 August 2011 (EDT)


 * --ThePrune 20:45, 28 August 2011 (EDT) Good advice, LadyGeek.  I'll pick the one or two best worksheets and keep only those in the Wiki text section.  The rest will be moved to External References.  And the ones I like will be converted by me into Excel format.  I agree it would be nice to have equivalent Open Source spreadsheet versions; can you convert from Excel to Open Source equivalents?

MS Excel is the industry standard format. Save in MS Excel format and you are done. The open source applications (OpenOffice and LibreOffice) are able to read and write Excel format, the conversions are done internally. No further work is needed on your part.

As for formatting, note that blbarnitz suggested a quote box. I don't know if you saw it, but it's easily viewed by digging into the page's history and looking at versions. 06:48, 27 August 2011. I like tables here, but it depends on what you want to do. I just thought to mention it, as quote boxes are a good way to well, quote something. --LadyGeek 21:32, 28 August 2011 (EDT)


 * --ThePrune 08:47, 29 August 2011 (EDT) Thanks for mentioning blbarnitz's Quote Box formatting proposal.  I had not seen it. I like the appearance, but have come to agree with your view that offering too many budget worksheet options is not the best approach.  It's better to just offer a few excellent choices, so the reader has less to deal with.  So I'll stick with my last proposal to convert 1 or 2 good worksheets into Excel format.

Time-Varying Budget Models
I would rename this section, as its not descriptive. Anything can be simple or complex, it depends on the perspective. Do you mean the time-varying models? --LadyGeek 19:39, 29 August 2011 (EDT)
 * --ThePrune 17:02, 3 September 2011 (EDT) Yes, calling the section "Time-varying budget models" is much more descriptive. Wording has been changed.

Single Budget Models
--ThePrune 15:09, 4 September 2011 (EDT) LadyGeek had made the suggestion to use the section title "Time-varying Budget Models" rather than the less descriptive "Complex Budget Models". Thinking this over for another day, it also seemed appropriate to use the section title "Single Budget Models" rather than "Simple Budget Models" for just the same reason. As an added benefit, the new section title supplies a clearer comparison to the section titled "Dual Budget Models".