Category talk:ExpandSection

I think that this category should be replaced with Expand. To me, it doesn't make any difference if work is needed for an entire page or just a section. The area of suggested improvement is helpful (section or page), but you lose visibility by splitting categories. --LadyGeek 01:31, 3 October 2010 (UTC)


 * I disagree; not a single forum member has responded to an expand request, even when the list has been repeatedly reported to them. A tighter category of more specific subject matter might stimulate participation, although I will admit that the likelihood of this happening is not very great.(I plan on reporting these more specific notices in upcoming "This Week on the Wiki" reports.) Again, I doubt if there will be much response. Beyond conversing on the forum, forum members prefer to write books, columns, and blogs --Blbarnitz 02:03, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

I see your point. I think that the presentation of the information is a stopping point for most users. There are 2 areas: 1) the "Bogleheads' Wiki Activity" section in the main page welcome box, and 2) presentation of information in the Expand category page; specifically the page layout. I'll start working on it. --LadyGeek 15:35, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

I updated the left sidebar and welcome page content that will (hopefully) be easier to use. --LadyGeek 19:58, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

Category:Expand updated. --LadyGeek 00:39, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

^^^^ is now Category:Expand article. --LadyGeek 20:28, 7 December 2012 (CST)