Talk:Book recommendations and reviews

Book Categorization
My additions are in progress.

As the forum thread questioning Irrational Exuberance indicates, the "Classics" designation is probably too subjective. I suggest we just categorize by subject and go alphabetical within the subject category. Tfb 19:31, 4 June 2008 (EDT)


 * I agree. "Classics" seems an unnecessary stretch to the Neutral Point of View concept. Ken Schwartz 19:45, 4 June 2008 (EDT)

Here is the list of Taylor's Gems that are not on Books: Recommendations and Reviews yet. If somebody could classify them and move them to Books: Recommendations and Reviews, that would be appreciated. PiperWarrior 13:58, 20 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Style Note: For ease of future editing, we have adopted the following ordering rules for this page:


 * 1) List books from most recent to oldest. This allows one to simply edit the top line of each section when adding a book.
 * 2) Within a publication year, organize in alphabetical order according to the last name of the primary listed author. {Example: the 2009 publications of the Bernstein and Zwieg books go the top of the list, with Bernstein preceding Zweig.] --Blbarnitz 01:28, 23 November 2009 (UTC)