Talk:Investment management company

See also section, should it include a Category: element?
There were some recent edits to move a Category link from the See also section to the Category section. This was subsequently reverted as Category lists do not show in mobile view. FWIW most navigational aids, Categories, Navigation boxes (navbox and sidebar) do not appear in mobile view, which is a separate issue.

I looked at Wikipedia's Manual of Style/Layout § See also section and Wikipedia:Categorization for guidance as to whether or not a Category link is an appropriate element in the See also section. There is no specific mention, but "A bulleted list of internal links to related Wikipedia articles." doesn't seem to me to include a Category link, after all that's what the Category section is for. Yes it is problematic that the categorization system doesn't appear in mobile view. But if we follow that argument/logic, then shouldn't every wiki article have all their Categories included in the See also section? I don't think this is an article specific choice, it's more about an overall guideline or policy.

For this specific article, my recommendation would be to remove the Category: from the See also section and add any "high profile" members of that Category to the See also section. --Peculiar Investor 09:48, 9 January 2017 (EST)


 * The original intent of Category:Investment management company was to replace a navigation menu containing a list of the relevant companies. In the context of a general glossary, a navigation menu for all of the terms is not appropriate. Hence, the "See also" link. I agree on the intent, as the page has with a list of the appropriate "high profile" members. --LadyGeek 20:14, 9 January 2017 (EST)