The Three-Fund Portfolio

Discuss all general (i.e. non-personal) investing questions and issues, investing news, and theory.
Post Reply
User avatar
Topic Author
Taylor Larimore
Posts: 32839
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 7:09 pm
Location: Miami FL

The Three-Fund Portfolio

Post by Taylor Larimore »

The Bogleheads' Guide to The Three-Fund Portfolio is now available in hardcover book, audio book and kindle. All royalties are donated directly to The John C. Bogle Center For Financial Literacy.
Bogleheads:

After a lifetime of investing since 1950 trying to "beat the market," I am convinced that a simple 3-fund (or ETF) portfolio of Total Stock Market, Total International, and Total Bond Market, properly allocated, is an ideal portfolio for most investors. The benefits are many (read blue links):

* Avoids wasted time and the possibility of mistakes trying to pick the best of thousands of mutual funds and ETFs.
* No individual stock risk.
* Highest return with lowest risk. Efficient.
* Very diversified with over 20,000 worldwide securities (lower risk).
* Very low expense ratios.
* Very low (hidden) turnover costs.
* Very tax-efficient.
* The many Advantages of Simplicity.
* No adviser risk.
* No fund manager risk.
* No style drift.
* No asset bloat.
* No tracking error to cause abandonment of the strategy.
* No fund overlap.
* No front-running that reduces sub-index returns.
* Automatic rebalancing within each fund.
* No need for a portfolio tracking program.
* Less worry. Never under-performs the market.
* Easy to maintain for the owner, spouse, caregivers and heirs.
* More free time.
* Mathematically certain to outperform most investors.
__________________________________________________________________________________________________

Asset Allocation: Use this Investor Questionnaire to help you decide your very important stock/bond allocation. I suggest International stocks = 20% of equity.

Fund Placement For Maximum Tax-Efficiency: Place Total Bond Market in tax-advantaged account(s). If full, use a tax-exempt bond fund in a taxable account. Place Total Stock Market and Total International Stock Market in either a tax-advantaged account (best) or a taxable account.
__________________________________________________________________________________________________

Past rate of inflation (CPU) and annual fund returns in The Three-Fund Portfolio:

YEAR--INFLATION--BOND INDEX--S&P 500 INDEX------MSCI EAFE INDEX
1976-------4.9%--------15.6%------------23.8%--------------------3.6%
1977-------6.7-----------3.0-------------(-7.2)-------------------17.5
1978-------9.0-----------1.4---------------6.6--------------------33.1
1979------13.3-----------1.9-------------18.4--------------------10.9 (Highest Annual Inflation Rate)
1980------12.5-----------2.7-------------32.4--------------------25.4
1981-------8.9-----------6.3-------------(-4.9)------------------(-2.5)
1982-------3.8----------32.6--------------21.6------------------(-0.3) (Highest Bond Index Return)
1983-------3.8-----------8.4--------------22.6-------------------24.8
1984-------3.9----------15.2---------------6.3--------------------3.5
1985-------3.8----------22.1--------------31.7-------------------51.4
1986-------1.1----------15.2--------------18.7-------------------65.8 (Highest Stock Return)
1987-------4.4-----------2.8----------------5.2-------------------24.6
1988-------4.4-----------7.9---------------16.6-------------------27.8
1989-------4.6----------14.5---------------31.7------------------11.4
1990-------6.1-----------8.9---------------(-3.1)---------------(-22.8)
1991-------3.1----------16.0---------------30.5------------------12.4
1992-------2.9-----------7.4-----------------7.6----------------(-11.9)
1993-------2.7-----------9.7----------------10.1------------------32.6
1994-------2.7---------(-2.9)----------------1.3--------------------7.6
1995-------2.5----------18.5---------------37.6-------------------11.8 (Highest S&P Index Return)
1996-------3.3-----------3.6----------------23.0--------------------7.2
1997-------1.7-----------9.7----------------33.4--------------------2.6
1998-------1.6-----------8.7----------------28.6-------------------19.1
1999-------2.7---------(-0.8)---------------21.0-------------------28.3
2000-------3.4----------11.6---------------(-9.1)----------------(-15.8)
2001-------1.6-----------8.4--------------(-11.9)----------------(-19.8)
2002-------2.4----------10.3-------------(-22.1)----------------(-15.3)
2003-------1.9-----------4.1----------------28.7-------------------40.4
2004-------3.3-----------4.3----------------10.9-------------------20.9
2005-------3.4-----------2.4-----------------4.9-------------------15.8
2006-------2.5-----------4.3----------------15.8------------------26.8
2007-------4.1-----------7.0-----------------5.5------------------11.6
2008-------0.1-----------5.2--------------(-37.0)---------------(-43.1) (Lowest U.S. and International Stock Returns)
2009-------2.7-----------5.9----------------26.5------------------32.5
2010-------1.5-----------6.5----------------15.1-------------------8.2
2011-------3.0-----------7.7-----------------2.1----------------(-11.7)
2012-------1.7-----------4.3----------------16.0------------------17.9
2013-------1.5---------(-2.0)---------------32.4------------------23.3
2014-------1.6-----------6.0----------------13.7-----------------(-4.5)
2015-------0.7-----------0.5-----------------1.4-----------------(-0.4)
2016-------2.1-----------2.6----------------12.0-------------------1.5
2017-------2.1-----------3.5----------------21.8------------------25.6
2018-------2.5---------(-0.1)--------------(-4.4)---------------(-13.4)
2019-------2.3-----------8.7----------------31.5------------------22.7
2020-------1.4-----------7.7----------------18.4------------------11.3
2021-------7.0---------(-1.7)---------------25.7-------------------8.6
2022-------6.5--------(-13.2)------------(-19.4)---------------(-16.0) (Lowest Bond Index Return)
2023-------3.4-----------5.7----------------26.2------------------15.5

Sources: Vanguard, U.S. Labor Department (CPI-U), Standard & Poors, Bloomberg Barclays Aggregate Bond Index, and DFTurner

Past performance does not forecast future performance.
____________________________________________________________________________________________________

What Nobel Laureate's say:

Douglas Diamond: "Asked what he’ll do with his share of the prize money, Diamond said he’ll probably put it in a total market index fund."

Eugene Fama: "Whether you decide to tilt toward value depends on whether you are willing to bear the associated risk...The market portfolio is always efficient...For most people, the market portfolio is the most sensible decision."

Daniel Kahneman: "Investors shouldn't delude themselves about beating the market. They're just not going to do it. It's just not going to happen."

Harry Markowitz: "A foolish attempt to beat the market and get rich quickly will make one's broker rich and oneself much less so."

Merton Miller: "Most people might just as well buy a share of the whole market, which pools all the information, than delude themselves into thinking they know something the market doesn't"

Paul Samuelson: "The most efficient way to diversify a stock portfolio is with a low-fee index fund. Statistically, a broadly based stock index fund will outperform most actively managed equity portfolios."

William Sharpe: "You may think your opinion is superior, but it pays to be humble, investing in the market rather than trying to beat it."

Robert Shiller: "A portfolio approximating the market may be the most important portfolio."
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________

What Other Experts Say:
American Association of Individual Investors: "It should come as no surprise that behavioral finance research makes a strong case for buying and holding low-cost, broadly diversified index funds."

Mark Balasa, CPA, CFP: "That three-pronged approach is going to beat the vast majority of the individual stock and bond portfolio that most people have at brokerage firms. There is a certain elegance in the simplicity of it."

Christine Benz, Morningstar Director of Personal Finance: "The Bogleheads' "Three-Fund Portfolio" is the ultimate in elegant minimalism."

Bill Bernstein, author of The Four Pillars of Investing: "Does this (three fund) portfolio seem overly simplistic, even amateurish? Get over it. Over the next few decades, the overwhelming majority of all professional investors will not be able to beat it."

Jack Bogle, Vanguard founder: "The beauty of owning the market is that you eliminate individual stock risk, you eliminate market sector risk, and you eliminate manager risk." -- "There may be better investment strategies than owning just three broad-based index funds but the number of strategies that are worse is infinite."

Jonathan Burton, MarketWatch: "There are plenty of ways to complicate investing, and plenty of people who stand to make money from you as a result. So just think of a three-fund strategy as something you won't have to think about too much."

Jonathan Clements, author and Wall Street Journal columnist: "Using broad-based index funds to match the market is, I believe, brilliant in its simplicity.

Consumer Reports Money Book: "Simply buy the market as a whole."

Laura Dugu, Ambassador and co-author of The Bogleheads' Guide to Retirement Planning: "With only these three funds in your investment portfolio you can benefit from low costs and broad diversification and still have a portfolio that is easy to manage."

Rick Ferri, Forbes columnist and author of six investment books: "The older I get, the more I believe the 3-fund portfolio is an excellent choice for most people. It's simple, cheap, easy to maintain, and has no tracking error that would cause emotional abandonment to the strategy."

Kiplinger's Retirement Report: "You'll beat most investors with just three funds that cover the vast majority of global stock and bond markets: Vanguard Total Stock Market; Vanguard Total International Stock Index and Vanguard Total Bond Market Index."

Prof. Burton Malkiel, author of Random Walk Down Wall Street: "I recommend a total-market index fund--one that follows the entire U.S. stock market. And I recommend the same approach for the U.S. bond market and international stocks."

E.F.Moody, author of No Nonsense Finance: "I am increasingly convinced that the best investment advice for both individual and institutional equity investors is to buy a low-cost broad-based index fund that holds all the stocks comprising the market portfolio."

Anna Pryor Wall Street Journal writer: "A simple portfolio of 3 funds. It may sound counter-intuitive, but for the average individual investor, less is actually more."

Allan Roth, CPA, CFP, AARP columnist, adviser and author of "How a Second Grader Beat Wall Street": "The beauty of a 3-fund portfolio is that it automatically builds the global portfolio without having to worry about standard deviations, correlations, Sharpe ratios, and the like. -- Over the years, I’ve benchmarked hundreds of portfolios against the equivalent weighted three-fund portfolio and can count on one hand the number of portfolios I’ve seen that bested this benchmark."

Gus Sauter, former Vanguard chief investment officer: "Most investors will be far better off if they follow Taylor's simple, yet sophisticated (3-fund) strategy."

BIll Schultheis, author of The Coffee House Investor: Only 10% of all managed mutual funds beat the Wilshire 5000 Index in each of the last three, five, and ten-year periods (3-31-99)."

Dan Solin, author of The Smartest Portfolio You'll Ever Own: "You can get as simple or as complicated as you'd like. You can keep it very simple by owning just three mutual funds that invests in domestic stocks, foreign stocks, and bonds. That's precisely what I recommend in my model portfolios."

Prof. Meir Statman, author of What Investors Really Want: "It makes sense to have those three funds. What makes it hard is that it seems too simple to actually be a winner."

Stein & DeMuth, authors of The Affluent Investor: "Buying and holding a few broad market index funds is perhaps the most important move ordinary investors can make to supercharge their portfolios."

Wilshire Research: "The market portfolio offers the best ratio of return to risk."

John Woerth, Vanguard director of public relations: "We would agree that this three-fund approach offers most investors a prudent, well-balanced, diversified portfolio at a low cost."

Warren Buffett, famed investor: "There seems to be some perverse human characteristic that likes to make easy things difficult."
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________

Articles featuring The Three-Fund Portfolio:

"The Best Investment Strategy Is Simple But Hard to Do" by Allan Roth in AARP

"Australian Version of the 3-Fund Portfolio" by Passive Investing - Australia

"Bogleheads 3 Fund Portfolio" by Dividend Power

"A 3 Fund Portfolio: The Simple Way to Invest" by The Frugal

"The BigLaw Investor Portfolio" by Joshua Hunt

"A Boglehead Explains the Simplest Way to Manage Your Money" by MarketWatch

"The Bogleheads' Guide to The Three-Fund Portfolio" by Four Pillar Freedom

"The Bogleheads Guide to the Three Fund Portfolio" by James Dahle, MD

"The Bogleheads' Guide to the Three-Fund Portfolio" by Rick Van Ness

"Bogleheads Three-Fund Portfolio Review" by Optimized Portfolio

"Build Bogleheads Three Fund Portfolio With ETFs" by Portfolio Einstein

"Building a Vanguard Three-Fund Portfolio" by The Wall Street Physician

"Brokerage, Roth, Pre-tax, and the 3-Fund Portfolio" by FiPhysicion

"Comparing 3-Fund Portfolios Over Time" by The Balance

"Efficient Investing with the Three Fund Portfolio" by Mr. Crazy Kicks

"An Extremely Simple 3 ETF Portfolio to Consider" by Data Driven Investor

"From 28 Funds to 3: Simplifying to a Three-Fund Portfolio" by Physician On Fire

"Get The Bogleheads' Guide to the Three-Fund Portfolio" by Financing Life.org

"He Has Read 250 Investing Books and Recommends the Three Fund Portfolio" by Physician on Fire

Here's Why Investors Love The 3-Fund Portfolio" by The Motley Fools

"How the Bogle (3-fund) Model Beats the Yale Model" by Ben Carlson

"How to Build a 3-Fund ETF" by The Balance

"How to Build A 3-Fund Portfolio at Fidelity" by Optimized Portfolio

"How to Build a Three-Fund Portfolio" by YAHOO

"How to Build a Three-Fund Portfolio" by Estorica

"How To Build a Three-Fund Portfolio" by Smart Asset

"How To Create A Three-Fund Portfolio" by Camilo Maldonado, Forbes

"How To Diversify With Just Three Mutual Funds" by Ambassador Laura Dogu, Forbes

"How to Save For Retirement With Just Three Investments" by Forbes Advisor

"How to Set Up a Fidelity 3-Fund Portfolio" by Time Value Millionaire

"How To Simplify Your Investing Using Only Three Funds" by Debt Free Doctor

"How To Use Bogleheads Three-Fund Portfolio To Build Your Wealth" by Claire Emerson

"How to Use a 3-Fund Portfolio In Your 401K" by Investopedia

"If You Can. How Millennials Can Get Rich Slowly" -- Free book by Wm. Bernstein

"Investing Should Be Simple. A Three-Fund Portfolio Is All You Need." by Allan Roth, AARP

"Is a Three-Fund Portfolio Right For You?" by Yahoo

"Is the Three-Fund Portfolio Right for You?" by Biglaw Investor

"The Lazy Portfolio -- Why A Simple 3 Fund Portfolio Might Be Best" by WealthFam

"Most Investors Probably Won’t Outperform This Simple (three-fund) Portfolio" by Morningstar

"Next to Nothing" by Jonathan Clements

"The Only Three Vanguard Funds You Need to Build a Portfolio" by Kent Thune

"Bogleheads Three Fund Portfolio Review" by Optimized Portfolio

"Review of Bogleheads Guide to the Three Fund Portfolio" by The White Coat Investor

"7 Rules for Building a 3-Fund Portfolio" by U.S.News

"The 3 Fund Portfolio" by Linkedin

"The Three Fund Portfolio: The Lazy Investing Strategy that Crushes the Pros" by The Money Wizard

"The Three Fund Portfolio" by Morningstar

"The Three Fund Portfolio: A Simple Diversified Investing Strategy" by Bible Matters

"The 3 Fund Portfolio: Simple Investing That Works" by Clevergirl Finance

"The 3-Fund Portfolio. A Simple Way to Invest" by Well Kept Wallet

"The Three-Fund Investment Portfolio: The Beauty of Simplicity" by Mama Fish Saves

"The Three-Fund Portfolio. Living the Simple Life" by Morningstar

"The Three-Fund Portfolio" -- Boglehead wiki

"Three-Fund Portfolio" by Personal Finance Club

"Save For Retirement With Just Three Investments" by Forbes Advisor

"The Simple Magic of Investing In A Three-Fund Portfolio" by BestWalletHacks

"Simplify Your Investments With The 3-Fund Portfolio" by Alicia Adamczyk

"Three-Fund Portfolio" by blbarnitz Financial Page

"Three-Fund Portfolio" by Personal Finance Club

"Three-Fund Portfolio" by Portfolio Charts

"Three Fund Portfolio – Investing Made Easy" by The Finance Twins

"Three-Fund Portfolios Can Cut Risk, Taxes, and Costs for Investors. Here’s How to Build One" by Barron's

"Three-Fund Portfolio: The Lazy Strategy That Really Works" by Invested Wallet

"Three Fund Portfolio" by CreditDonkey

"Three Mutual Funds That End The Guesswork" by MarketWatch

"Three-Fund Portfolios Using Fidelity Index Funds" by Wall Street Physician

"3 Fund Portfolio: The Lazy Way To Invest" by Just Start Investing

"3 Fund Portfolio Investment Strategy: The Only Time Lazy is Cool" by Dr. Breathe Easy Finance:

"3 Index Funds is All You Need" by Let's Talk Money

"3 Fund Portfolio--What is it, Exactly" by Wall Street Mojo

"The Vanguard Three Fund Portfolio" by Dept-Free Doctor


________________________________________________________________________________________________

Videos featuring The Three-Fund Portfolio:

"Bogleheads 3 Fund Portfolio Review" by Optimized Portfolio

"Bogleheads 3 Fund Portfolio: What If You Invested $1,000 Per Month For The Last 30 Years?" by Corey on Investing

"Build The Three-Fund Portfolio in M1 Finance" by Sisters for FI

"EASY 3 Fund Portfolio That Defeats The Majority Of The Pros!" by Danny's Money Talk

"How To Build A 3 Fund Portfolio (The Lazy Portfolio)" by White Board Finance

"How to Build a 3-Fund Portfolio for Beginners" by The Modest Wallet

"How to Build a Rock-Solid Investment Portfolio" by Humphrey Yang

"How To Build The Perfect Three-Fund Portfolio" by Rob Berger

How To Build The Perfect Vanguard Portfolio For Beginners by Christos Fellas (UK)

"How To Create A Three Fund Portfolio by Let's Talk Finance"

"How to Create a 3 Fund Portfolio--Beginners Guide" by Rob Berger

"How to Create A 3-Fund Portfolio With Charles Schwab" by Robbie in Moneyland

"How to Create A 3-Fund Portfolio With Fidelity" by Robbie in MoneyLand

"My Fidelity Three Fund Portfolio ($0-100k Less Than 2 Years)" by Moki Finance

"Retire Off This 3-Fund Portfolio" by Decade Investor

"Simple Investing Portfolio For Beginners" by Humphrey Yang

"The Three-Fund Portfolio--How it Works" by Clever Girl

"The 3 Fund Portfolio" by Linkedin

"3 Fund Portfolio - The #1 Investment Portfolio" by Tae Kim

"3 Index Funds is All You Need" by Let's Talk Money

"Time to Ditch The Three-Fund Portfolio" by Jarrad Morrow

"You Won't Believe This Three Fund Portfolio Is So Easy" by Joseph Hogue, CPA

"Why the 3 Fund Portfolio is King" by Jarrid Morrow.

Best wishes.
Taylor
Jack Bogle's Words of Wisdom: "There may be better investment strategies than owning just three broad-based index funds but the number of strategies that are worse is infinite."
Last edited by Taylor Larimore on Sat Feb 24, 2024 1:29 pm, edited 152 times in total.
"Simplicity is the master key to financial success." -- Jack Bogle
livesoft
Posts: 85971
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 7:00 pm

Re: The Three Fund Portfolio

Post by livesoft »

While I respect your view, have you thought that it might be tainted by recency bias?

First, the Total Int'l Index fund has existed in its current format for about 12 months.
Second, the past year was a poor year for small-caps and value equities, so the broad index funds look great in comparison.
And Third, what about TIPS? :)

... just trying to keep the Permanent Portfolio folks at bay.
Wiki This signature message sponsored by sscritic: Learn to fish.
ClaireTN
Posts: 247
Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2009 7:23 pm
Location: Tennessee

Re: The Three Fund Portfolio

Post by ClaireTN »

I'm also curious about the exclusion of TIPS. I'm using a four-fund portfolio: TSM, TISM, TBM, and TIPS.
Nathan Drake
Posts: 6201
Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2011 12:28 am

Re: The Three Fund Portfolio

Post by Nathan Drake »

While I respect your view, have you thought that it might be tainted by recency bias?
There's really no 'recency bias' to the three fund portfolio. Any recency bias would depend on how much you have allocated to any of the three funds listed (per your asset allocation) since bonds have beat stocks this past decade:

Total International Stock Market has done relatively well in the past decade.

Total Bond Market has done very well in the past decade.

Total US Stock Market has done so-so, but still positive over the past decade.
20% VOO | 20% VXUS | 20% AVUV | 20% AVDV | 20% AVES
Cash
Posts: 1572
Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2010 9:52 am

Re: The Three Fund Portfolio

Post by Cash »

Taylor, might you one day simplify even further to Vanguard Total World + Total Bond Market?
no_name
Posts: 572
Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2010 12:55 pm

Re: The Three Fund Portfolio

Post by no_name »

Cash wrote:Taylor, might you one day simplify even further to Vanguard Total World + Total Bond Market?
Not Taylor, Total STK markt and Total Int'l Markt complement each other, and it's easier to tilt to value small caps./
User avatar
Noobvestor
Posts: 5944
Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2010 1:09 am

Re: The Three Fund Portfolio

Post by Noobvestor »

jumpin wrote:
Cash wrote:Taylor, might you one day simply even further to Vanguard Total World + Total Bond Market?
Not Taylor, Total STK markt and Total Int'l Markt complement each other, and it's easier to tilt to value small caps./
The bigger problem is simply expenses ... the ETF version mercifully has no load, but the fund version has a small buy-in and sell cost. Silly, but true.
"In the absence of clarity, diversification is the only logical strategy" -= Larry Swedroe
User avatar
CaliJim
Posts: 3050
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2010 7:47 pm
Location: California, near the beach

Re: The Three Fund Portfolio

Post by CaliJim »

There is much to be said for keeping it simple and diversifying broadly.

Slicing and dicing and tilting certainly adds effort for just a skosh higher expected return, and there is no guarantee that it will have been worth it.

If I could only hold asset classes - my three would be TSM (or Total World Stock Market-TWSM?) , TBM, and TIPS.

TSM and ISM are closely enough correlated, and I'll be spending most of it in USD,

I like a dose of TIPS as a hedge against unexpected inflation. Obviously - since TIPS have been around in the US only since 1997 - there isn't a lot of history to go on WRT how they will perform over the long haul compared to TBM, but I'm hoping they will smooth things out during the withdrawal phase.
Cash
Posts: 1572
Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2010 9:52 am

Re: The Three Fund Portfolio

Post by Cash »

Noobvestor wrote:
jumpin wrote:
Cash wrote:Taylor, might you one day simply even further to Vanguard Total World + Total Bond Market?
Not Taylor, Total STK markt and Total Int'l Markt complement each other, and it's easier to tilt to value small caps./
The bigger problem is simply expenses ... the ETF version mercifully has no load, but the fund version has a small buy-in and sell cost. Silly, but true.
They recently eliminated the purchase fee for the mutual fund version. The early redemption fee remains but can be avoided by the ETF. VT is still more expensive than the combination of TSM and TISM, but one could argue that the simplicity and additional time spent with family and friends is worth an extra .1%, and VT's expense ratio is likely to fall further.
Muchtolearn
Posts: 1563
Joined: Sun Dec 25, 2011 9:41 am

Re: The Three Fund Portfolio

Post by Muchtolearn »

What makes certain individuals decide that TIPS, REITs and small cap value adds anything to passive indices other than recency bias or even some other type of bias?
word
Posts: 440
Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2010 8:32 pm

Re: The Three Fund Portfolio

Post by word »

Muchtolearn wrote:What makes certain individuals decide that TIPS, REITs and small cap value adds anything to passive indices other than recency bias or even some other type of bias?
Additional risk means the investor expects additional return. As for TIPS, they function to reduce volatility in my overall portfolio. What makes you say that these portfolio impacts are just recency bias?
User avatar
Topic Author
Taylor Larimore
Posts: 32839
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 7:09 pm
Location: Miami FL

Re: The Three Fund Portfolio

Post by Taylor Larimore »

Cash wrote:Taylor, might you one day simplify even further to Vanguard Total World + Total Bond Market?
Cash:

I have considered simplifying The Three Fund Portfolio to a Two Fund Portfolio (Total World + Total Bond Market). However, keeping Total U.S. Stock Market and Total International Stock Market separate has several advantages:

Lower (combined) Expense Ratios (Admiral Shares): Total Stock Market (VTSAX) = 0.04%; Total International (VTIAX) = 0.11%; Total World (VTWAX) = 0.10%.

Better diversification (lower risk): Total U.S. Stock Market and Total International (combined) hold 11,932 stocks. Total World holds 9,289.

Total World, because it holds less than 50% foreign stocks, does not benefit from the Foreign Tax Credit.

Flexibility: The best allocation between U.S. Total Stock Market and Total International is very controversial. Separate funds allow investors to choose their desired allocations.
(edited 1/1/2022)

Best wishes.
Taylor
Last edited by Taylor Larimore on Sat Jan 01, 2022 1:43 pm, edited 8 times in total.
"Simplicity is the master key to financial success." -- Jack Bogle
AgnosticInvestor
Posts: 101
Joined: Sat Dec 10, 2011 7:33 pm

Re: The Three Fund Portfolio

Post by AgnosticInvestor »

This is my portfiolio (TSM, TISM, TBM). That's it. [My current employer was kind enough to offer the Big 3 as investment options under my 401(k) plan]. I'm constantly thinking of ways to improve it, but I'm weary of making it worse.
User avatar
joe8d
Posts: 4544
Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 7:27 pm
Location: Buffalo,NY

Re: The Three Fund Portfolio

Post by joe8d »

Personally, I feel (as does Vanguard) that a U.S. investor should overweight domestic stocks primarily because many of our large corporations have significant overseas earnings and we buy and sell in domestic currency.
Agree with Taylor.
All the Best, | Joe
shariron
Posts: 175
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 7:20 pm

Re: The Three Fund Portfolio

Post by shariron »

100% of my tax advantaged stock and bond investments are in the 4 fund portfolio- Total Stock Market, Total International, Total Bond Market, + Tips fund. Add Intermediate Tax Exempt in taxable + emergency funds and that’s it. For me, getting there was the conclusion of a multi-year journey that took me from a completely ignorant investor to a true Boglehead. Without Bogle’s courage, Vanguard, and the folks on this website, none of this would have ever occurred. It’s just that simple. Only thing left to do now is wait until my target allocation matches a TR fund (and should admiral shares for TR funds be introduced by then) to simplify even further!
Cash
Posts: 1572
Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2010 9:52 am

Re: The Three Fund Portfolio

Post by Cash »

Taylor Larimore wrote:
Cash wrote:Taylor, might you one day simplify even further to Vanguard Total World + Total Bond Market?
To Vanguard's credit, they recently announced an index change for Total World:
In order to include U.S. and international small-capitalization stocks that weren't in its previous target benchmark, the fund now seeks to track the FTSE® Global All Cap Index. This benchmark is designed to measure the performance of large-, mid-, and small-capitalization stocks worldwide, with appropriate capitalization weighting. The index is also float-adjusted, so its weighting only includes shares that are available for purchase, as opposed to all outstanding shares.

Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund invests in a broadly diversified sampling from its benchmark, which is made up of nearly 7,400 securities in 47 different countries and captures 98% of the world's investable stock market capitalization. About 56% of the index is made up of non-U.S. stocks.
https://personal.vanguard.com/us/insigh ... t-12192011 (emphasis added)

This gives me hope that Vanguard will continue to lower costs and increase diversification. Regardless, your points regarding current cost and domestic percentages are well taken. Happy new year to you as well!
User avatar
ofcmetz
Posts: 2465
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2011 7:09 pm
Location: Louisiana

Re: The Three Fund Portfolio

Post by ofcmetz »

I really like the three fund portfolio, but I can't resist the urge to season mine with a few extra REIT's and TIP's. So I guess the cajun in me likes something slightly more spicy.
Never underestimate the power of the force of low cost index funds.
User avatar
beyou
Posts: 6868
Joined: Sat Feb 27, 2010 2:57 pm
Location: If you can make it there

Re: The Three Fund Portfolio

Post by beyou »

shariron wrote:100% of my tax advantaged stock and bond investments are in the 4 fund portfolio- Total Stock Market, Total International, Total Bond Market, + Tips fund. Add Intermediate Tax Exempt in taxable + emergency funds and that’s it. For me, getting there was the conclusion of a multi-year journey that took me from a completely ignorant investor to a true Boglehead. Without Bogle’s courage, Vanguard, and the folks on this website, none of this would have ever occurred. It’s just that simple. Only thing left to do now is wait until my target allocation matches a TR fund (and should admiral shares for TR funds be introduced by then) to simplify even further!
Not to digress, but from a tax standpoint this is not exactly the recommendation.
Why have your stocks in tax advantaged portfolio ? The typical advice
is to only buy the munis if you run out of tax advantaged space for bond allocation.
stlutz
Posts: 5585
Joined: Fri Jan 02, 2009 12:08 am

Re: The Three Fund Portfolio

Post by stlutz »

My 2012 prediction. Taylor's original post will be the best post on this board for the entire year. :D
Fallible
Posts: 8795
Joined: Fri Nov 27, 2009 3:44 pm

Re: The Three Fund Portfolio

Post by Fallible »

I've had those three funds since the '90s, though I also have a few more. I loved reading the "expert" comments you provided. Great way to start the New Year! :D
"Yes, investing is simple. But it is not easy, for it requires discipline, patience, steadfastness, and that most uncommon of all gifts, common sense." ~Jack Bogle
User avatar
CABob
Posts: 5091
Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 7:55 pm
Location: Southern California

Re: The Three Fund Portfolio

Post by CABob »

The majority of my investments are the three funds, but, I have added a tilt with TIPS, REIT, SCV, and GNMA. For the past several months I have been considering dropping the tilts for simplicity, but, intertia prevails at the moment.
Bob
User avatar
jidina80
Posts: 729
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 4:05 pm
Location: Fiji

Re: The Three Fund Portfolio

Post by jidina80 »

Taylor Larimore wrote:After a lifetime of investing since 1950 trying to "beat the market," I am convinced that a simple 3-fund (or ETF) portfolio of Total Stock Market, Total International, and Total Bond Market, properly balanced, is an ideal portfolio for most investors. . . . .
Further support for this 3-Fund approach comes from the fact that these same 3 funds form the core holdings in Vanguard's own Target Retirement Funds.
https://personal.vanguard.com/us/funds/ ... rementList
User avatar
Boglenaut
Posts: 3508
Joined: Mon Mar 23, 2009 7:41 pm

Re: The Three Fund Portfolio

Post by Boglenaut »

ofcmetz wrote:I really like the three fund portfolio, but I can't resist the urge to season mine with a few extra REIT's and TIP's. So I guess the cajun in me likes something slightly more spicy.
I am not Cajun, but agree. How could anyone argue with the three fund portfolio? But of course in my eternal quest to improve on perfection, I have some TIPS, REITs, and some small/mid cap around the edges. I even put in a tiny pinch of HY Bond for seasoning. But those three funds (or their equivelents) do all the heavy lifting.

But if I only had the three funds, I'd be fine with that. This year (oops, I mean last year) I reduced my taxable funds from 6 to 2.
tpm871
Posts: 149
Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2010 10:58 am

Re: The Three Fund Portfolio

Post by tpm871 »

In terms of fees, you'd be better off with a mix of Vanguard Europe, Pacific Rim, and Emerging Markets fund rather than ISM. Europe and Pacific (which comprise most of ISM) have an ER of 0.14, whereas ISM has an ER of 0.20. There's also better rebalancing opportunities with having them separate, and taxes associated with rebalancing can be avoided by only selling shares held in tax deferred accounts. The downside though is no Canada stocks... and a little bit more complexity.

I think a Treasury Bond Fund is better than TBM, since it is less correlated with equities (e.g., since TBM holds corporate bonds). I don't think the logic of "owning the whole market" makes as much sense for bonds as it does for stocks; for example, I don't want to own junk bonds just because they are a part of the bond market -- I prefer to take most of my risk in equities.
User avatar
bertilak
Posts: 10711
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2011 5:23 pm
Location: East of the Pecos, West of the Mississippi

Re: The Three Fund Portfolio

Post by bertilak »

ofcmetz wrote:I really like the three fund portfolio, but I can't resist the urge to season mine with a few extra REIT's and TIP's. So I guess the cajun in me likes something slightly more spicy.
That EXACTLY describes my portfolio.
May neither drought nor rain nor blizzard disturb the joy juice in your gizzard. -- Squire Omar Barker (aka S.O.B.), the Cowboy Poet
golfallday
Posts: 118
Joined: Sat Feb 14, 2009 2:43 am
Location: College Point, NY

Re: The Three Fund Portfolio

Post by golfallday »

Taylor. your post inspires confidence!! The only funds I use in my 457 plan are VIIIX and VBTIX; Mr Bogle's writings and discussions have thoroughly convinced me that the SP500 has an enormous international footprint. I use VTHRX in my IRA. When $$ is leftover at the end of month it goes to VTSMX in the taxable account. Maybe I'm starting to get it after all!!
Muchtolearn
Posts: 1563
Joined: Sun Dec 25, 2011 9:41 am

Re: The Three Fund Portfolio

Post by Muchtolearn »

golfallday wrote:Taylor. your post inspires confidence!! The only funds I use in my 457 plan are VIIIX and VBTIX; Mr Bogle's writings and discussions have thoroughly convinced me that the SP500 has an enormous international footprint. I use VTHRX in my IRA. When $$ is leftover at the end of month it goes to VTSMX in the taxable account. Maybe I'm starting to get it after all!!
I like that golfallday. A 2-fund portfolio. Makes life simple although there is less "diversification" although as you say, US stocks now have half their earnings abroad and probably international stocks have half their earnings here. So it may be all a wash. At least I'm going that way.
centrifuge41
Posts: 1317
Joined: Mon May 17, 2010 9:04 am

Re: The Three Fund Portfolio

Post by centrifuge41 »

tpm871 wrote:In terms of fees, you'd be better off with a mix of Vanguard Europe, Pacific Rim, and Emerging Markets fund rather than ISM. Europe and Pacific (which comprise most of ISM) have an ER of 0.14, whereas ISM has an ER of 0.20. There's also better rebalancing opportunities with having them separate, and taxes associated with rebalancing can be avoided by only selling shares held in tax deferred accounts. The downside though is no Canada stocks... and a little bit more complexity.
I believe that the Total Intl Stock Market Fund also holds small cap international stocks, whether they are from Europe, the Pacific, Canada, or Emerging Markets, while the 3 regionalized international funds don't have small caps.
shariron
Posts: 175
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 7:20 pm

Re: The Three Fund Portfolio

Post by shariron »

Blevine- Yes, your point is well taken. Between self employment and 529’s, I’ve got a lot of tax advantaged space available and a long time frame to let it grow.
golfallday
Posts: 118
Joined: Sat Feb 14, 2009 2:43 am
Location: College Point, NY

Re: The Three Fund Portfolio

Post by golfallday »

I like that golfallday. A 2-fund portfolio. Makes life simple although there is less "diversification" although as you say, US stocks now have half their earnings abroad and probably international stocks have half their earnings here. So it may be all a wash. At least I'm going that way.
[/quote]

The reason I use VIIIX for my stock allocation is that my 457 plan doesn't offer a Total US Stock Index; furthermore, there is no International Index offered...if there was, I would be in it.
User avatar
englishgirl
Posts: 2508
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 4:34 pm
Location: FL

Re: The Three Fund Portfolio

Post by englishgirl »

Muchtolearn wrote:
golfallday wrote:Taylor. your post inspires confidence!! The only funds I use in my 457 plan are VIIIX and VBTIX; Mr Bogle's writings and discussions have thoroughly convinced me that the SP500 has an enormous international footprint. I use VTHRX in my IRA. When $$ is leftover at the end of month it goes to VTSMX in the taxable account. Maybe I'm starting to get it after all!!
I like that golfallday. A 2-fund portfolio. Makes life simple although there is less "diversification" although as you say, US stocks now have half their earnings abroad and probably international stocks have half their earnings here. So it may be all a wash. At least I'm going that way.
Just to be pedantic, but somebody has to do it: golfallday has a 4-fund portfolio, not a 2-fund portfolio. [Though I had to go look up the ticker symbols to make sure.] There is a lot of overlap between VIIIX (500-index as far as I can tell), VTHRX (target retirement) and VTSMX (total stock market), but they are slightly different funds.

Personally, I think a good minimal fund portfolio would be a LifeStrategy fund + TIPs. Another option is Balanced Index + TIPs + International. Of course, these are all the same as having Total Stock + Total Bond + Total International + TIPs, but it saves doing some of the rebalancing yourself.
Sarah
rustymutt
Posts: 4001
Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2009 11:03 am

Re: The Three Fund Portfolio

Post by rustymutt »

VTI 30%
VEU 30%
VFITX 20%
SCHP 20%

The above account above had a loss for 2011, while the account below made money. I believe it was because of the asset allocation, rather than the choice of investments.

RPV 3%
VPU 4%
VHT 4%
VNQ 4%
IWC 3%
VBR 4%
EFV 6%
EWX 6%
DLS 6%
VFIUX 30%
VAIPX 30%
Even educators need education. And some can be hard headed to the point of needing time out.
User avatar
Aptenodytes
Posts: 3786
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2011 7:39 pm

Re: The Three Fund Portfolio

Post by Aptenodytes »

rustymutt wrote:VTI 30%
VEU 30%
VFITX 20%
SCHP 20%

The above account above had a loss for 2010, while the account below made money. I believe it was because of the asset allocation, rather than the choice of investments.

RPV 3%
VPU 4%
VHT 4%
VNQ 4%
IWC 3%
VBR 4%
EFV 6%
EWX 6%
DLS 6%
VFIUX 30%
VAIPX 30%
Last year 60% bonds beat 40% bonds. But then 100% bonds beat 60% bonds. And there was a lottery ticket that beat 100% bonds.
User avatar
FNK
Posts: 1360
Joined: Tue May 17, 2011 7:01 pm

Re: The Three Fund Portfolio

Post by FNK »

Muchtolearn wrote:US stocks now have half their earnings abroad and probably international stocks have half their earnings here. So it may be all a wash. At least I'm going that way.
Folks, this is a fallacy. You're confusing the market of a corporation with the ownership of a corporation. Consider:

Apple (a US corporation) sells iPhones. Samsung and HTC (Asian corporations) sell Android phones.

Suppose you own only US companies. Suppose Android kills iPhone. How is it relevant to your portfolio that Apple sells iPhones in Europe?

The fact that US companies operate internationally means that the owner of US stocks is exposed to international risks. The fact that foreign companies operate in US means the same. The boglehead response to risk is to diversify. Not owning international companies means taking uncompensated risk, i.e. leaving free lunch on the table.

Note that US companies operating world-wide also expose you to currency risks, so the currency home bias is questionable.

And that's why I like 50/50 us/intl equity. A simple approximation to true market weighting (and a little bit of cowardice, I may be wrong after all). TR's 70/30 is backwards looking.

International stocks are on sale now, load up.
Muchtolearn
Posts: 1563
Joined: Sun Dec 25, 2011 9:41 am

Re: The Three Fund Portfolio

Post by Muchtolearn »

FNK wrote:
Muchtolearn wrote:US stocks now have half their earnings abroad and probably international stocks have half their earnings here. So it may be all a wash. At least I'm going that way.
Folks, this is a fallacy. You're confusing the market of a corporation with the ownership of a corporation. Consider:

Apple (a US corporation) sells iPhones. Samsung and HTC (Asian corporations) sell Android phones.

Suppose you own only US companies. Suppose Android kills iPhone. How is it relevant to your portfolio that Apple sells iPhones in Europe?

The fact that US companies operate internationally means that the owner of US stocks is exposed to international risks. The fact that foreign companies operate in US means the same. The boglehead response to risk is to diversify. Not owning international companies means taking uncompensated risk, i.e. leaving free lunch on the table.

Note that US companies operating world-wide also expose you to currency risks, so the currency home bias is questionable.

And that's why I like 50/50 us/intl equity. A simple approximation to true market weighting (and a little bit of cowardice, I may be wrong after all). TR's 70/30 is backwards looking.

International stocks are on sale now, load up.
FNK,
Let's assume, as I think you agree, but even if you don't agree, that precisely half of US earnings are international and vice versa. Please explain why it would then matter if you were invested 50% each or 100% in US or 100% international? To go further, what if you lived in the UK? Would you be half UK and half international?
User avatar
ObliviousInvestor
Posts: 4212
Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 9:32 am
Contact:

Re: The Three Fund Portfolio

Post by ObliviousInvestor »

This three-fund portfolio is what my wife and I now use for our retirement savings (though we do it via one fund -- LifeStrategy Growth).
Mike Piper | Roth is a name, not an acronym. If you type ROTH, you're just yelling about retirement accounts.
tj
Posts: 9317
Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2009 11:10 pm

Re: The Three Fund Portfolio

Post by tj »

ObliviousInvestor wrote:This three-fund portfolio is what my wife and I now use for our retirement savings (though we do it via one fund -- LifeStrategy Growth).
I like this idea! I stayed away from the LifeStrategy funds because they had that Asset Allocation fund but they appeared to have gotten rid of it. Still, it makes having investments in 401K + ROTH + Taxable even more complicated...
User avatar
ObliviousInvestor
Posts: 4212
Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 9:32 am
Contact:

Re: The Three Fund Portfolio

Post by ObliviousInvestor »

tj wrote:I stayed away from the LifeStrategy funds because they had that Asset Allocation fund but they appeared to have gotten rid of it.
Yep, the Asset Allocation fund was removed sometime in the last couple months.
tj wrote:Still, it makes having investments in 401K + ROTH + Taxable even more complicated...
Indeed. We are lucky in that all of our retirement savings are a) tax-sheltered and b) with Vanguard.
Mike Piper | Roth is a name, not an acronym. If you type ROTH, you're just yelling about retirement accounts.
User avatar
Topic Author
Taylor Larimore
Posts: 32839
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 7:09 pm
Location: Miami FL

Vanguard experts saw the light ahead.

Post by Taylor Larimore »

Further support for this 3-Fund approach comes from the fact that these same 3 funds form the core holdings in Vanguard's own Target Retirement Funds.
With the most recent changes in the Target and Life Strategy Funds, Vanguard experts finally saw the light. :wink:

Happy New Year!
Taylor
"Simplicity is the master key to financial success." -- Jack Bogle
User avatar
FabLab
Posts: 1127
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2010 12:15 pm

Re: The Three Fund Portfolio

Post by FabLab »

Thanks Taylor! This has been one of my favorite threads. Why? Because the 3-4 fund, total market index portfolio is so easily maintained and sensible that I now have much more time to spend on other pursuits. Things that I once cared about (buying/selling, timing, etc.), quite remarkably, hold little or no interest to me now.

Cheers,
Ron
The fundamental things apply as time goes by -- Herman Hupfeld
User avatar
Topic Author
Taylor Larimore
Posts: 32839
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 7:09 pm
Location: Miami FL

Thank you, Mr. Bogle

Post by Taylor Larimore »

Hi Ron:
Things that I once cared about (buying/selling, timing, etc.), quite remarkably, hold little or no interest to me now.


I feel the same. We can both thank Mr. Bogle.

Happy New Year!
Taylor
"Simplicity is the master key to financial success." -- Jack Bogle
User avatar
FNK
Posts: 1360
Joined: Tue May 17, 2011 7:01 pm

Re: The Three Fund Portfolio

Post by FNK »

Muchtolearn wrote:FNK,
Let's assume, as I think you agree, but even if you don't agree, that precisely half of US earnings are international and vice versa. Please explain why it would then matter if you were invested 50% each or 100% in US or 100% international?
Well, earnings of public companies are public, so no need to assume (and it's of course not 50/50 both ways). Regardless, say Chinese companies outcompete US companies world-wide. Then, US stock market will go down in favor of international (in this case, Chinese) stocks. It can go down maintaining the neat 50/50 domestic/international revenue stream. So it will matter a lot whether I owned US or international stocks.

It does not matter where the market is. It matters what companies you own. You want to own all of them.
Muchtolearn wrote:To go further, what if you lived in the UK? Would you be half UK and half international?
Tough question! I have been pondering it. I'd probably gravitate towards global market-cap weighting, which would make the UK slice smaller.
umfundi
Posts: 3361
Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2011 5:26 pm

Re: The Three Fund Portfolio

Post by umfundi »

Taylor,

Thank you! But, I still need a little more tutorial advice.

I am somewhat more concerned about diversification and volatility than most. So, I have always had a little (3-5% each) specifically in REITS and in Natural Resources. But, that was then.

Do you think your current recommendations adequately include these less correlated components?

EDIT: And, while I'm at it, is there an easy way to see returns for comparable lazy portfolios of Vanguard funds? I am interested to see how they compare to portfolios that have the same philosophy (I think) but are more complex, like Alex Green's "Gone Fishin' Portfolio": http://www.gonefishinportfolio.com/

Thank you,

Keith
Déjà Vu is not a prediction
AnotherINTP
Posts: 9
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2011 10:12 pm
Location: Atlanta area

Re: Vanguard experts saw the light ahead.

Post by AnotherINTP »

Taylor Larimore wrote:
Further support for this 3-Fund approach comes from the fact that these same 3 funds form the core holdings in Vanguard's own Target Retirement Funds.
With the most recent changes in the Target and Life Strategy Funds, Vanguard experts finally saw the light. :wink:

Happy New Year!
Taylor
Each New Year brings the hope of progress -- or at least of new ideas to consider.

A case could be made that the new generation of Vanguard's all-in-one funds is even better than a traditional implementation of a lazy Big Three Index Fund portfolio:
  • * simpler
    * much better stability of asset ratios (apparent risk), with no manual rebalancing required (unless life circumstances change)
    * during 2011 at least, slightly better returns for any of the Target Retirement funds than their underlying target ratio of 3 Index funds -- even if implemented as Admiral shares or ETFs!
The daily or fast rebalancing of the TR funds (and LifeStrategy funds very recently) adds a slightly new twist to index portfolio construction: it wasn't tracking error that gave the TR funds their slight edge in 2011, it was rebalancing strategy. Perhaps this hasn't generated much discussion on this forum because it is a fairly modest and rather random effect that will vary from year to year.

Even those who prefer to customize and tinker with a mostly Big Three Index Fund lazy portfolio might consider starting with a Target Retirement or LifeStrategy fund as the core building block (in a tax-advantaged account), in order to maintain a more constant level of market risk and perhaps take advantage of market volatility. (Constant rebalancing is just constantly buying low and selling high, right? 8-) )
User avatar
Topic Author
Taylor Larimore
Posts: 32839
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 7:09 pm
Location: Miami FL

The Efficient Frontier and Past Performance

Post by Taylor Larimore »

Hi Keith:

I will try to answer your questions one at a time:
I am somewhat more concerned about diversification and volatility than most. So, I have always had a little (3-5% each) specifically in REITS and in Natural Resources. But, that was then. Do you think your current recommendations adequately include these less correlated components?
The total market portfolios hold the market's weight in every marketable corporation--including REITS and Natural Resources. So your question involves "overweighting segments you think will outperform or reduce risk.

Many academics believe that Market Portfolios are on the "Efficient Frontier": Portfolios having the highest expected return possible for the given amount of risk. For this reason, I doubt that we can improve the risk/return trade-off by overweighting with additional securities already in the index.

If you are "Somewhat more concerned about diversification and volatility than most," in my opinion the best solution is to increase your bond allocation--not add more stock funds.
And while I'm at it, is there an easy way to see returns for comparable lazy portfolios of Vanguard funds? I am interested to see how they compare to portfolios that have the same philosophy (I think) but are more complex, like Alex Green's "Gone Fishin' Portfolio": http://www.gonefishinportfolio.com/
Total Market Index Fund performance reflects the market weight of all the asset-classes (REITS, Utilities, Precious Metal Companies, Small-Value, etc.) within it. Overweighting specific asset-classes will likely cause the Total Market Index to fall below the Efficient Frontier. For this reason I doubt if adding funds with the additional complexity is worth the trouble.

It is easy to back-test and find selected asset-classes that outperformed during certain periods and infer that these same asset-classes will outperform going forward. It seems logical but using past performance to pick winners is such a lousy idea that even the government requires mutual funds to tell you it is a lousy idea.

If anything, stocks, funds and asset-classes that outperform in one period are the ones that underperform later as they return to their mean. Mr. Bogle explains all this in this speech we heard him deliver at our Boglehead Reunion in June, 2002:

http://www.vanguard.com/bogle_site/sp20020626.html

Happy New Year!
Taylor
"Simplicity is the master key to financial success." -- Jack Bogle
User avatar
CABob
Posts: 5091
Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 7:55 pm
Location: Southern California

Re: The Three Fund Portfolio

Post by CABob »

is there an easy way to see returns for comparable lazy portfolios of Vanguard funds? I am interested to see how they compare to portfolios that have the same philosophy (I think) but are more complex
Have you seen Madsinger's reports? http://www.bogleheads.org/forum/viewtop ... 10&t=86447
Bob
reisner
Posts: 516
Joined: Fri Jun 20, 2008 12:34 pm

Re: The Three Fund Portfolio

Post by reisner »

Re:

Total International? Doesn't the FTSE outperform this, as well as including otherwise-missing Canada?

Total Bond Market? Isn't the IT bond Market both safer and preferred by Jack Bogle?

And what about a safe house for money? How about the ST Bond Market?

These may be mere tweaks.

Thanks,
Rob E
umfundi
Posts: 3361
Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2011 5:26 pm

Re: The Three Fund Portfolio

Post by umfundi »

Taylor, and Bob:

Thank you very much!

It is incredible how much knowledge has gone into providing the simple choices that Taylor proposes.

Keith
Déjà Vu is not a prediction
rohitj
Posts: 33
Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2011 11:07 pm

Re: The Three Fund Portfolio

Post by rohitj »

You still have institutional risk. If vanguard screws up their algorithms for buying / selling / balancing, you're pretty much screwed. Just not worth the risk to me -- I'd rather have 8 or 10 funds spread between 2 or 3 trusted institutions.
umfundi
Posts: 3361
Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2011 5:26 pm

Re: The Three Fund Portfolio

Post by umfundi »

Taylor,

Thank you for your thoughtful reply.

I asked about back testing simply so I could understand the past performance of various recommendations.

I put no credence into notions of "Reversion To The Mean" as you reference Jack Bogle, nor to "Momentum" as Larry Swedroe sometimes seems to want to believe in.

I am very interested in simplifying my choices, and I thank you for that.

Is there someone in particular at Vanguard that we should thank for continuing and expanding Jack Bogle's vision?

Best wishes,

Keith
Déjà Vu is not a prediction
Post Reply