VBS offers free VG ETF trades, qualify for Voyager with 50k
VBS offers free VG ETF trades, qualify for Voyager with 50k
Good news Bogleheads!
VBS is now offering commission free Vanguard ETF trades: https://personal.vanguard.com/us/insigh ... s-05042010
Now Voyager eligibility is reduced to $50,000 assets so no account fee if you meet that requirement: https://personal.vanguard.com/us/whatwe ... Link=facet
VBS is now offering commission free Vanguard ETF trades: https://personal.vanguard.com/us/insigh ... s-05042010
Now Voyager eligibility is reduced to $50,000 assets so no account fee if you meet that requirement: https://personal.vanguard.com/us/whatwe ... Link=facet
- White Coat Investor
- Posts: 15157
- Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 9:11 pm
- Location: Greatest Snow On Earth
Oooh. This is big news. I may just need to start doing ETFs now. I'm going to have to look into this. Do you know if the fee for converting from mutual fund shares to ETF shares is lowered too?
1) Invest you must 2) Time is your friend 3) Impulse is your enemy |
4) Basic arithmetic works 5) Stick to simplicity 6) Stay the course
-
- Posts: 517
- Joined: Wed Jun 27, 2007 1:12 pm
Looks like the $50 fee for ETF conversion is eliminated too.EmergDoc wrote:Oooh. This is big news. I may just need to start doing ETFs now. I'm going to have to look into this. Do you know if the fee for converting from mutual fund shares to ETF shares is lowered too?
This is the last push I need to convert FTSE small to ETF shares, so I can stop paying those 0.75% purchase fees. I think I'll convert REIT too, to lower my ER.
https://personal.vanguard.com/us/conten ... sp#link_12
There is no fee for Vanguard Brokerage clients to convert conventional shares to Vanguard ETFs of the same fund. Other brokerage providers may charge a fee for this service. For more information, contact your brokerage firm, or call 866-499-8473.
- simplesimon
- Posts: 4013
- Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2008 8:53 pm
I just saw this on their website, and I'm stoked. I was contemplating opening a Fidelity account for my nascent taxable account, but now I don't have to.
My question: For a tax-advantaged account, is there any reason not to convert my mutual funds to the corresponding ETF? I'm thinking in particular of my traditional IRA, where no money is going in or out at the moment. Most of the funds are just sitting there, with rebalancing done in other accounts. I could sell the mutual funds and buy the corresponding ETF's without a tax hit or a commission.
I understand the issues with bid-ask spreads and so forth, but if I am literally going to buy once and hold forever, wouldn't the price advantage of the ETF's trump any slight disadvantage?
My question: For a tax-advantaged account, is there any reason not to convert my mutual funds to the corresponding ETF? I'm thinking in particular of my traditional IRA, where no money is going in or out at the moment. Most of the funds are just sitting there, with rebalancing done in other accounts. I could sell the mutual funds and buy the corresponding ETF's without a tax hit or a commission.
I understand the issues with bid-ask spreads and so forth, but if I am literally going to buy once and hold forever, wouldn't the price advantage of the ETF's trump any slight disadvantage?
Discipline is freedom.
Aargh - this figures. I converted to three ETFs at VG within the last month, and I paid the fee on each conversion. For those of us with the PMA accounts at WellsTrade, I guess this news doesn't make much difference. I hold both VG ETFs and certain other ETFs (RZV, DGS) at WellsTrade. Good news if Wells ever changes their policies, though.
-
- Posts: 517
- Joined: Wed Jun 27, 2007 1:12 pm
Yes. This is from Vanguard's website:simplesimon wrote:The $50k minimum for Voyager eligibility is for all accounts combined? I have a Roth IRA and a taxable account.
Vanguard wrote:Membership is based on total household assets held at Vanguard, with a minimum of $50,000 to qualify for Vanguard Voyager Services®, $500,000 for Vanguard Voyager Select Services®, and $1 million for Vanguard Flagship Services®. We determine membership by aggregating assets of all eligible accounts held by the investor and his or her immediate family members who reside at the same address, including investments in Vanguard mutual funds, Vanguard ETFs®, annuities through Vanguard, The Vanguard 529 Plan, and certain small-business accounts. Assets in employer-sponsored retirement plans for which Vanguard provides recordkeeping services may be included in determining eligibility if the investor also has a personal account holding Vanguard mutual funds. Note that assets held in a Vanguard Brokerage Services® account (other than Vanguard ETFs) aren't included when determining a household's eligibility.
- brick-house
- Posts: 475
- Joined: Thu May 07, 2009 1:16 pm
- Location: Philadelphia, PA
Holy smokes! Tremendous offering.
Voyager Services®
Voyager Services can help you manage your growing investing needs so you can work toward your goals with confidence.
Investors with $50,000 to $500,000 in Vanguard mutual funds
* Commission-free Vanguard ETF® trades and reduced commissions for stocks and non-Vanguard ETFs. No account service fees.*
* A detailed financial plan at a discount. A Certified Financial Planner™ professional from Vanguard will analyze your investments and saving strategy.
You don't need no gypsy to tell you why- Greg Allman
I feel the same way. I am seriously considering opening up a WellsTrade account, but always in the back of my mind I think that they might change their policies. This news from Vanguard gives me a backup plan.Scorpion wrote:Aargh - this figures. I converted to three ETFs at VG within the last month, and I paid the fee on each conversion. For those of us with the PMA accounts at WellsTrade, I guess this news doesn't make much difference. I hold both VG ETFs and certain other ETFs (RZV, DGS) at WellsTrade. Good news if Wells ever changes their policies, though.
" A man’s wisdom maketh his face to shine, and the boldness of his face shall be changed." Ecclesiastes 8:1
Apologize I realized I posted in Personal finance. This should probably go to investing theory.
Anyway, I really see ETF conversion of investor shares/brokerage account as a no-brainer especially if you are Voyager or higher. You get an ER competitive with admiral shares and you are just subject to the spread.
However, someone only holding admiral shares will probably not benefit much, as you would be subject to spreads without much reduction in ER.
I might wait a few days to see if VBS can really handle the onslaught of new accounts without any hiccups, but otherwise will probably make the switch soon.
Anyway, I really see ETF conversion of investor shares/brokerage account as a no-brainer especially if you are Voyager or higher. You get an ER competitive with admiral shares and you are just subject to the spread.
However, someone only holding admiral shares will probably not benefit much, as you would be subject to spreads without much reduction in ER.
I might wait a few days to see if VBS can really handle the onslaught of new accounts without any hiccups, but otherwise will probably make the switch soon.
WellsTrade is still a better option if you plan on holding any non-Vanguard ETFs (or mutual funds that aren't NTF - IE. Bridgeway, Schwab RAFI, etc.). If you just want to hold just Vanguard funds, then I could see going with Vanguard now. Although I've heard some bad things about Vanguard's buying/selling interface. WF lets you identify specific lots when selling of stocks/ETFs (which is important if you want to TLH), not sure about Vanguard...HeatIndex wrote:I feel the same way. I am seriously considering opening up a WellsTrade account, but always in the back of my mind I think that they might change their policies. This news from Vanguard gives me a backup plan.Scorpion wrote:Aargh - this figures. I converted to three ETFs at VG within the last month, and I paid the fee on each conversion. For those of us with the PMA accounts at WellsTrade, I guess this news doesn't make much difference. I hold both VG ETFs and certain other ETFs (RZV, DGS) at WellsTrade. Good news if Wells ever changes their policies, though.
Its deifitetely a risk that WF changes their policies, but in this ultra-competitive world of free trading (Schwab, Fido, BOA, Zecco and now Vanguard) this would put WF at a competitive disadvantage. So, risk exists, but I thinkits lower than you might expect.
- ObliviousInvestor
- Posts: 3852
- Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 9:32 am
- Contact:
One small point of note is that if your Vanguard assets are < $50,000, you'd have to pay an annual $20 fee to have a brokerage IRA, whereas an IRA with just index funds won't have a fee (assuming you get email statements).dphmd wrote:I just saw this on their website, and I'm stoked. I was contemplating opening a Fidelity account for my nascent taxable account, but now I don't have to.
My question: For a tax-advantaged account, is there any reason not to convert my mutual funds to the corresponding ETF? I'm thinking in particular of my traditional IRA, where no money is going in or out at the moment. Most of the funds are just sitting there, with rebalancing done in other accounts. I could sell the mutual funds and buy the corresponding ETF's without a tax hit or a commission.
I understand the issues with bid-ask spreads and so forth, but if I am literally going to buy once and hold forever, wouldn't the price advantage of the ETF's trump any slight disadvantage?
Mike Piper |
Roth is a name, not an acronym.
good, but . . .
I don't mean to look a gift horse in the mouth, but there's one potential downside. This may prompt Vanguard to let its Admiral shares program wither on the vine. It will be harder now for a fund to reach the critical mass of large accounts that Vanguard uses as a trigger to introduce an Admiral share class.
-
- Posts: 2569
- Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 9:17 pm
- Location: San Jose, CA
- Random Musings
- Posts: 5912
- Joined: Thu Feb 22, 2007 4:24 pm
- Location: Pennsylvania
For the Flagship people:
RM
I think I'll never get to the $2 trade part.....As a Flagship member, you're now eligible for unlimited, commission-free Vanguard ETF® trades, 25 free stock trades, and $2 stock trades after that.
Vanguard ETFs Unlimited, free trades*
Stocks & Non-Vanguard ETFs 25 free trades per year**
$2 for your subsequent trades
RM
I would like it to be noted that I posted the following this past Sunday, May 2:

(in this thread: http://www.bogleheads.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=54433). So I expect a little more respect around here from now on.Now that both Fidelity and Schwab will offer free trading on reasonably complete sets of ETF['s], I'm wondering how long Vanguard can resist market pressure to offer free trading on its own set of ETF's.

No, but they will do HIFO accounting for you, if you so elect.Does VBS let you specify lots when selling online?
Does this mean I will go from my free 100 VG trades down to 25??Random Musings wrote:For the Flagship people:
I think I'll never get to the $2 trade part.....As a Flagship member, you're now eligible for unlimited, commission-free Vanguard ETF® trades, 25 free stock trades, and $2 stock trades after that.
Vanguard ETFs Unlimited, free trades*
Stocks & Non-Vanguard ETFs 25 free trades per year**
$2 for your subsequent trades
RM
Would not really make any difference to me. But it's good to see VG going back to being the low-cost provider.
Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler - Einstein
- nvboglehead
- Posts: 463
- Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 12:44 pm
I am glad that VG is staying competitive with its rivals. I have had an account with them for over 15 years, since the days when they were VDBS (Vanguard Discount Brokerage Services) - a terrible acronym - it is good that they changed that!
I have been satisified with their services over the years. They offered free US Treasury securities purchases at the auctions before it became a common practice. Their brokered cd rates now are some of the best if you are interested in doing cd ladders.
Dale
I have been satisified with their services over the years. They offered free US Treasury securities purchases at the auctions before it became a common practice. Their brokered cd rates now are some of the best if you are interested in doing cd ladders.
Dale
- Random Musings
- Posts: 5912
- Joined: Thu Feb 22, 2007 4:24 pm
- Location: Pennsylvania
Prokofiev wrote:
But for most Flagship people, all free Vanguard ETF's plus 25 free trades (that can include non-Vanguard ETF's) will make it less compelling to move.
Even investors in the Voyager Select category (with $2 trades for non-Vanguard ETF's or individual equities) will be less compelled to move.
I see this as an effort as a continuing strategy to increase Vanguard's market share in the ETF arena. However, some of that will growth will come as a result of cannibalization within their mutual fund lineup.
RM
Is that through Vanguard or another provider? If outside broker, I would keep the free 100. If from Vanguard, I would hope they honor it.Does this mean I will go from my free 100 VG trades down to 25??
But for most Flagship people, all free Vanguard ETF's plus 25 free trades (that can include non-Vanguard ETF's) will make it less compelling to move.
Even investors in the Voyager Select category (with $2 trades for non-Vanguard ETF's or individual equities) will be less compelled to move.
I see this as an effort as a continuing strategy to increase Vanguard's market share in the ETF arena. However, some of that will growth will come as a result of cannibalization within their mutual fund lineup.
RM
- White Coat Investor
- Posts: 15157
- Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 9:11 pm
- Location: Greatest Snow On Earth
I'd like to know that too.Trebor wrote:
For those who have converted to etf share class, how do you keep track of tax lots when you ultimately sell?
Also, how do reinvested distributions work with ETFs within a tax-protected account? Should you not do it if the ETF is trading at a premium? Also, any tricks on timing the conversion from mutual funds to ETFs?
It looks like I ought to do this at least for my intl small and EM funds, probably my taxable TSM, and maybe even bring my BRSIX over to VG brokerage services. Anyone know if the BRSIX transaction fee changes at all under these recent changes? Edit: Looks like it's still $20 a trade for BRSIX and other non-NTF funds through fundaccess. Someday perhaps.
Last edited by White Coat Investor on Tue May 04, 2010 11:36 am, edited 1 time in total.
1) Invest you must 2) Time is your friend 3) Impulse is your enemy |
4) Basic arithmetic works 5) Stick to simplicity 6) Stay the course
Apparently they have not changed their redemption fee of 1%, up to $250, for selling non-Vanguard NTF funds held less than 180 days. In some cases it would be cheaper if they just eliminated the no-fee and charged a flat commission for all non-Vanguard funds. $250 for a trade is prohibitively expensive.
-
- Posts: 4201
- Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:52 am
- Location: Houston
WOW! That is great news.
Regarding the conversion to ETF, it (https://personal.vanguard.com/us/conten ... sp#link_12) says the following:
Of course this had to happen just a few months after I moved some index fund over to Wells Trade to consolidate. I would have converted them to ETFs first.
Heck, if the conversion is free for basically everyone, it might make sense to make a habit of investing in the mutual fund and then immediately converting to ETFs. You skip the bid-ask-spread cost when buying but still get the lower ER - the best of both worlds.
Regarding the conversion to ETF, it (https://personal.vanguard.com/us/conten ... sp#link_12) says the following:
Does that mean other brokerages (for example Wells Trade) can convert Vanguard index funds to ETFs? I thought this was only possible directly at Vanguard.There is no fee for Vanguard Brokerage clients to convert conventional shares to Vanguard ETFs of the same fund. Other brokerage providers may charge a fee for this service. For more information, contact your brokerage firm, or call 866-499-8473.
Of course this had to happen just a few months after I moved some index fund over to Wells Trade to consolidate. I would have converted them to ETFs first.
Heck, if the conversion is free for basically everyone, it might make sense to make a habit of investing in the mutual fund and then immediately converting to ETFs. You skip the bid-ask-spread cost when buying but still get the lower ER - the best of both worlds.
- nisiprius
- Advisory Board
- Posts: 42899
- Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 9:33 am
- Location: The terrestrial, globular, planetary hunk of matter, flattened at the poles, is my abode.--O. Henry
TIPS! TIPS! What about TIPS? No TIPS. Darn.
I can't consolidate everything at Fidelity because I'm not prepared to substitute iShares ETFs for my Vanguard funds. On paper there's no really good reason why I couldn't, but I just ain't gonna. I'm not gonna pay commissions to buy Vanguard ETFs, either. Or pay a $75 transaction fee to buy Vanguard funds.
I can't consolidate everything at Vanguard because even though I have only sold a TIPS on the market once in my life, I might want to again someday.
This is starting to sound a little silly even to me. Well, it's not as if there were any big rush.
I can't consolidate everything at Fidelity because I'm not prepared to substitute iShares ETFs for my Vanguard funds. On paper there's no really good reason why I couldn't, but I just ain't gonna. I'm not gonna pay commissions to buy Vanguard ETFs, either. Or pay a $75 transaction fee to buy Vanguard funds.
I can't consolidate everything at Vanguard because even though I have only sold a TIPS on the market once in my life, I might want to again someday.
This is starting to sound a little silly even to me. Well, it's not as if there were any big rush.
Annual income twenty pounds, annual expenditure nineteen nineteen and six, result happiness; Annual income twenty pounds, annual expenditure twenty pounds ought and six, result misery.
My sentiments exactly. : - )
Random Musings wrote:For the Flagship people:
I think I'll never get to the $2 trade part.....As a Flagship member, you're now eligible for unlimited, commission-free Vanguard ETF® trades, 25 free stock trades, and $2 stock trades after that.
Vanguard ETFs Unlimited, free trades*
Stocks & Non-Vanguard ETFs 25 free trades per year**
$2 for your subsequent trades
RM
- Opponent Process
- Posts: 5157
- Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2007 9:19 pm
Re: good, but . . .
I think the concept of mutual funds is withering on the vine.Eric wrote:I don't mean to look a gift horse in the mouth, but there's one potential downside. This may prompt Vanguard to let its Admiral shares program wither on the vine. It will be harder now for a fund to reach the critical mass of large accounts that Vanguard uses as a trigger to introduce an Admiral share class.

30/30/20/20 |
US/International/Bonds/TIPS |
Average Age=37
Re: good, but . . .
Is this really a bad thing though? Shouldn't these funds become more tax efficient as the ETF share class increases vs. conventional share class? Not that this hybrid model wasn't tax efficient to beign with, but if ETFs end up being 80% with conventional shares being 20%... Seems like a good idea to me.Opponent Process wrote:I think the concept of mutual funds is withering on the vine.Eric wrote:I don't mean to look a gift horse in the mouth, but there's one potential downside. This may prompt Vanguard to let its Admiral shares program wither on the vine. It will be harder now for a fund to reach the critical mass of large accounts that Vanguard uses as a trigger to introduce an Admiral share class.
-
- Posts: 2622
- Joined: Sun Aug 02, 2009 10:25 am
- Location: Washington
This is very interesting news. Had this been the case a month ago I wouldn't have moved my taxable account over to WellsTrade.
Still though, the WellsTrade tax lot accounting is awesome and I've heard that Vanguard doesn't do that. I wonder if that will change? And this makes me feel more safe in WellsTrade's deal. If WF ever gives up the free trades I could easily just go back to Vanguard.
But this is a big win for sure for the small investor. WTG Vanguard!
Still though, the WellsTrade tax lot accounting is awesome and I've heard that Vanguard doesn't do that. I wonder if that will change? And this makes me feel more safe in WellsTrade's deal. If WF ever gives up the free trades I could easily just go back to Vanguard.
But this is a big win for sure for the small investor. WTG Vanguard!
That is fantastic news. Free Vanguard ETFs for all VBS account holders!
Note that Vanguard isn't leaving the door open though to freely trade all day with their free commission ETFs:
"If you buy and sell the same Vanguard ETF in a Vanguard Brokerage account more than 25 times in a 12-month period, you may be restricted from purchasing that Vanguard ETF through your Vanguard Brokerage account for 60 days."
You can chop your expenses in half in some cases. For example -- VG Midcap Value Index Fund has 0.30% ER but the ETF is only 0.14% ER !!! Even more cost savings comes with the likes of the EM ETF and International Smallcap ETF.
Note for those opening a VBS account --- In general, Vanguard assesses the household assets in May/June and applies the $20 annual fee in June if you don't meet the Voyager status level, at a minimum, which now is set starting at $50k. However, Vanguard waives this assessment for the 1st year. So if you're opening say a VBS Roth account now and starting off with plopping down $2000 to invest or converting your $30k in VG mutual funds to etfs and have less than $50k in total VG funds & etfs to at least qualify for Voyager status.....Vanguard will not be charging you the $20 VBS fee this coming June --- it is waived for the 1st year for new accounts.
Once you meet the $50k household asset minimum - be sure to call Vanguard to upgrade your status to Voyager level.
Another note with regards to a VBS regular/taxable account -- you can specify to use HIGHEST COST FIRST cost-basis accounting method as the default for your VBS account which applies to ETFs & Stocks. So can be convenient for those who want the automatic convenience of this method in minimizing taxes when trimming or rebalancing ETFs in their taxable accounts.
Note that Vanguard isn't leaving the door open though to freely trade all day with their free commission ETFs:
"If you buy and sell the same Vanguard ETF in a Vanguard Brokerage account more than 25 times in a 12-month period, you may be restricted from purchasing that Vanguard ETF through your Vanguard Brokerage account for 60 days."
You can chop your expenses in half in some cases. For example -- VG Midcap Value Index Fund has 0.30% ER but the ETF is only 0.14% ER !!! Even more cost savings comes with the likes of the EM ETF and International Smallcap ETF.
Note for those opening a VBS account --- In general, Vanguard assesses the household assets in May/June and applies the $20 annual fee in June if you don't meet the Voyager status level, at a minimum, which now is set starting at $50k. However, Vanguard waives this assessment for the 1st year. So if you're opening say a VBS Roth account now and starting off with plopping down $2000 to invest or converting your $30k in VG mutual funds to etfs and have less than $50k in total VG funds & etfs to at least qualify for Voyager status.....Vanguard will not be charging you the $20 VBS fee this coming June --- it is waived for the 1st year for new accounts.
Once you meet the $50k household asset minimum - be sure to call Vanguard to upgrade your status to Voyager level.
Another note with regards to a VBS regular/taxable account -- you can specify to use HIGHEST COST FIRST cost-basis accounting method as the default for your VBS account which applies to ETFs & Stocks. So can be convenient for those who want the automatic convenience of this method in minimizing taxes when trimming or rebalancing ETFs in their taxable accounts.
Last edited by Kenster1 on Tue May 04, 2010 12:19 pm, edited 6 times in total.
SURGEON GENERAL'S WARNING: Any overconfidence in your ability, willingness and need to take risk may be hazardous to your health.
-
- Posts: 3630
- Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2007 11:42 am
That's funny, because I think it is the first time I recall seeing a restriction on the "frequent" trading of a publicly traded security! I can understand, though. I hope none of you was planning to DCA into the same ETF weekly.Kenster1 wrote: Note that Vanguard isn't leaving the door open though to freely trade all day with their free commission ETFs:
"If you buy and sell the same Vanguard ETF in a Vanguard Brokerage account more than 25 times in a 12-month period, you may be restricted from purchasing that Vanguard ETF through your Vanguard Brokerage account for 60 days."
- simplesimon
- Posts: 4013
- Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2008 8:53 pm
Wouldn't you face the spread when doing this conversion?natureexplorer wrote:Heck, if the conversion is free for basically everyone, it might make sense to make a habit of investing in the mutual fund and then immediately converting to ETFs. You skip the bid-ask-spread cost when buying but still get the lower ER - the best of both worlds.
While it probably will be the end of conventional index mutual fund share class, many 401k plans do not have brokerage abilities. If Vanguard was to maintain market share, they had no choice but to match the competition. It may theoretically improve tax efficiency of funds. Frequent traders will not have negative impact on fund.
There are some negatives.
1) It will encourage even more foolish frequent trading of ETF shares.
2) There is no free lunch….who absorbs the cost of trading…are the spreads enough to make it cost neutral?
3) What if the experiment ends badly and trading costs ultimately rise later when you need to sell.
4) Other conventional index funds will never reach admiral status now. You will ultimately have to convert to ETF class. I am uncertain how to keep track of my tax lots after conversion. I fear this will prove cumbersome and difficult later. I hope those who have already converted can tell me how this works.
5) The end of year tax reporting is likely superior and easier with the mutual fund class (particularly with foreign funds) than the etf class.
6) Buying Vanguard etfs will require a Vanguard brokerage account in most cases. This is ok but Vanguard needs to improve their tax lot tracking to match competition.
There are some negatives.
1) It will encourage even more foolish frequent trading of ETF shares.
2) There is no free lunch….who absorbs the cost of trading…are the spreads enough to make it cost neutral?
3) What if the experiment ends badly and trading costs ultimately rise later when you need to sell.
4) Other conventional index funds will never reach admiral status now. You will ultimately have to convert to ETF class. I am uncertain how to keep track of my tax lots after conversion. I fear this will prove cumbersome and difficult later. I hope those who have already converted can tell me how this works.
5) The end of year tax reporting is likely superior and easier with the mutual fund class (particularly with foreign funds) than the etf class.
6) Buying Vanguard etfs will require a Vanguard brokerage account in most cases. This is ok but Vanguard needs to improve their tax lot tracking to match competition.
TINSTAAFL