YNAB doubles it’s prices for legacy subscribers
YNAB doubles it’s prices for legacy subscribers
I was pretty upset to see YNAB double it’s legacy pricing this morning from $45/yr to almost $90. I’ve contacted the owner, Jesse to express my dissatisfaction.
I’ve used YNAB since version 3.0. Has anybody else moved away recently or will you now with the price hike?
Simple spreadsheet anybody?
I’ve used YNAB since version 3.0. Has anybody else moved away recently or will you now with the price hike?
Simple spreadsheet anybody?
-
- Posts: 4074
- Joined: Fri Jan 29, 2016 11:40 am
Re: YNAB doubles it’s prices for legacy subscribers
Whoa. I've been a very satisfied YNAB user since way back when as well. That will really make me reconsider. It's a really nice interface and I like they way it budgets in envelopes, but $15/mo (less annually) is crazy. That's more than Netflix - and YNAB doesn't really add that much value for me.
Re: YNAB doubles it’s prices for legacy subscribers
I too am a long time satisfied customer that will have to reconsider. Mine doesn't renew until August so I have some time to figure out if there are better/cheaper options.
Re: YNAB doubles it’s prices for legacy subscribers
I hadn't seen that, and will be renewing again in January. Honestly, this is to be expected by now for basically any tech service. The tried and true business model is that a service gains marketshare with a good product at an unsustainably low price. If and when they have successfully tied-in enough users, they raise prices by about double. So long as signals the transition from start-up phase to long-term stability phase, I think that's a good sign for any service you count on.
YNAB has and continues to help me save far more than $90/year - let alone the time investment I'd need to replicate even a fraction of its functionality, so I'll continue to pay. My bigger concern would be if they went out of business - there is no other software quite like it on the market - at least not anything I'd count on long-term.
Edit - I don't think comparisons to services like Netflix are quite fair. An app like YNAB doesn't have nearly their costs, but they also don't have any hope of scaling to the hundreds of millions of subscribers that make a video streaming app possible for under $15/month.
YNAB has and continues to help me save far more than $90/year - let alone the time investment I'd need to replicate even a fraction of its functionality, so I'll continue to pay. My bigger concern would be if they went out of business - there is no other software quite like it on the market - at least not anything I'd count on long-term.
Edit - I don't think comparisons to services like Netflix are quite fair. An app like YNAB doesn't have nearly their costs, but they also don't have any hope of scaling to the hundreds of millions of subscribers that make a video streaming app possible for under $15/month.
-
- Posts: 512
- Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2016 8:43 pm
Re: YNAB doubles it’s prices for legacy subscribers
Of all my subscriptions, it's probably the one I mind paying the least - it's a huge timesaver and organizer for our family. The company doesn't sell your data, is reliable, continues to get updated, etc.
I wasn't a legacy customer though so the increase wasn't that bad.
I wasn't a legacy customer though so the increase wasn't that bad.
Re: YNAB doubles it’s prices for legacy subscribers
I bought the downloadable software and liked it all right, but then a year later they moved to the subscription model. I'm OK with buying something once, but I really can't stand subscription services. I switched to doing my current budget with my own spreadsheet. It works fine. I wouldn't spend $90.
Re: YNAB doubles it’s prices for legacy subscribers
Still on YNAB 4.
I am of two minds of this: $90/year is $7.50 a month, and if you don't get $7.50/mo worth of value from YNAB, why are you using it at all? Seems like a low bar.
On the other hand, I am not a fan (although I understand the appeal) of so much software moving toward recurring subscriptions. You used to buy a release for $80, use it for 2-3 years, and then buy a new one for $80, use for 2-3 years. $90/year is basically like buying a release a year, so really the price is doubling or tripling over the last model. And they'll only want to increase from here.
On balance, I won't be subscribing, because YNAB 4 works for me as our finances are stable enough to be basically be in the maintenance mode==I'm not trying to pay down debt or save for a mortgage or anything. But if I were, I think $90/year would be my limit. At that point I can build a spreadsheet to adhere to the four rules and while I might not have Quick Fill and auto-import, that'd be ok.
I am of two minds of this: $90/year is $7.50 a month, and if you don't get $7.50/mo worth of value from YNAB, why are you using it at all? Seems like a low bar.
On the other hand, I am not a fan (although I understand the appeal) of so much software moving toward recurring subscriptions. You used to buy a release for $80, use it for 2-3 years, and then buy a new one for $80, use for 2-3 years. $90/year is basically like buying a release a year, so really the price is doubling or tripling over the last model. And they'll only want to increase from here.
On balance, I won't be subscribing, because YNAB 4 works for me as our finances are stable enough to be basically be in the maintenance mode==I'm not trying to pay down debt or save for a mortgage or anything. But if I were, I think $90/year would be my limit. At that point I can build a spreadsheet to adhere to the four rules and while I might not have Quick Fill and auto-import, that'd be ok.
-
- Posts: 3289
- Joined: Mon Nov 24, 2014 10:30 pm
Re: YNAB doubles it’s prices for legacy subscribers
Part of the issue is the fees that account aggregators charge. That part of the software is effectively a pass through cost. I don't know what they get charged, I just know it isn't insignificant.8foot7 wrote: ↑Mon Nov 01, 2021 8:47 am Still on YNAB 4.
I am of two minds of this: $90/year is $7.50 a month, and if you don't get $7.50/mo worth of value from YNAB, why are you using it at all? Seems like a low bar.
On the other hand, I am not a fan (although I understand the appeal) of so much software moving toward recurring subscriptions. You used to buy a release for $80, use it for 2-3 years, and then buy a new one for $80, use for 2-3 years. $90/year is basically like buying a release a year, so really the price is doubling or tripling over the last model. And they'll only want to increase from here.
On balance, I won't be subscribing, because YNAB 4 works for me as our finances are stable enough to be basically be in the maintenance mode==I'm not trying to pay down debt or save for a mortgage or anything. But if I were, I think $90/year would be my limit. At that point I can build a spreadsheet to adhere to the four rules and while I might not have Quick Fill and auto-import, that'd be ok.
Earned 43 (and counting) credit hours of financial planning related education from a regionally accredited university, but I am not your advisor.
Re: YNAB doubles it’s prices for legacy subscribers
Fair point.Soon2BXProgrammer wrote: ↑Mon Nov 01, 2021 9:00 amPart of the issue is the fees that account aggregators charge. That part of the software is effectively a pass through cost. I don't know what they get charged, I just know it isn't insignificant.8foot7 wrote: ↑Mon Nov 01, 2021 8:47 am Still on YNAB 4.
I am of two minds of this: $90/year is $7.50 a month, and if you don't get $7.50/mo worth of value from YNAB, why are you using it at all? Seems like a low bar.
On the other hand, I am not a fan (although I understand the appeal) of so much software moving toward recurring subscriptions. You used to buy a release for $80, use it for 2-3 years, and then buy a new one for $80, use for 2-3 years. $90/year is basically like buying a release a year, so really the price is doubling or tripling over the last model. And they'll only want to increase from here.
On balance, I won't be subscribing, because YNAB 4 works for me as our finances are stable enough to be basically be in the maintenance mode==I'm not trying to pay down debt or save for a mortgage or anything. But if I were, I think $90/year would be my limit. At that point I can build a spreadsheet to adhere to the four rules and while I might not have Quick Fill and auto-import, that'd be ok.
I wonder then if a tiered approach might be something to consider - YNAB basic for the regular price, YNAB+ with auto import for whatever the aggregators charge plus a markup?
Not my business to run, though.
Re: YNAB doubles it’s prices for legacy subscribers
Are you sure current subscribers aren't grandfathered in to the price they signed up at? I thought they'd done that in the past.
Edit: They make it very clear that the pricing change effects everyone. The 10% discount for legacy customers still applies. That's unfortunate. My subscription renews this month, so I guess I have a year to get used to the new pricing or find an alternative. I dragged my feet switching from YNAB 4, so my price isn't as good as some of you, so I don't have as big a price jump as some of you (since I've been paying more).
Edit: They make it very clear that the pricing change effects everyone. The 10% discount for legacy customers still applies. That's unfortunate. My subscription renews this month, so I guess I have a year to get used to the new pricing or find an alternative. I dragged my feet switching from YNAB 4, so my price isn't as good as some of you, so I don't have as big a price jump as some of you (since I've been paying more).
If that's the case then they should make this an add-on service. I'm a happy manual only user, and I think that makes it a better product as in improves ones connection to the budget. And I don't trust the aggregators enough to give them my login credentials against my financial institutions' terms of service.Soon2BXProgrammer wrote: ↑Mon Nov 01, 2021 9:00 am Part of the issue is the fees that account aggregators charge. That part of the software is effectively a pass through cost. I don't know what they get charged, I just know it isn't insignificant.
Last edited by terran on Mon Nov 01, 2021 9:26 am, edited 1 time in total.
Re: YNAB doubles it’s prices for legacy subscribers
terran wrote: ↑Mon Nov 01, 2021 9:12 am Are you sure current subscribers aren't grandfathered in to the price they signed up at? I thought they'd done that in the past.
If that's the case then they should make this an add-on service. I'm a happy manual only user, and I think that makes it a better product as in improves ones connection to the budget. And I don't trust the aggregators enough to give them my login credentials against my financial institutions' terms of service.Soon2BXProgrammer wrote: ↑Mon Nov 01, 2021 9:00 am Part of the issue is the fees that account aggregators charge. That part of the software is effectively a pass through cost. I don't know what they get charged, I just know it isn't insignificant.
The site said the next time you auto renew it will be at the new price. People who have been with them a long time do still get a 10% discount.
To me the aggregation is the best part of the service. I would likely be fine just using spreadsheets, but I hated typing in every transaction and that's a big reason I may stay on. I feel sufficiently connected to my budget.
-
- Posts: 3289
- Joined: Mon Nov 24, 2014 10:30 pm
Re: YNAB doubles it’s prices for legacy subscribers
I believe I've heard Jesse from YNAB being quoted on a podcast saying that they flipped from saying 'we want people to have to enter every transaction manually' to "we want it to be automatic to reduce the effort so that people can spend time on the parts that matter".. I could be incorrectly remembering.. So effectively its a business decision to force inclusion.terran wrote: ↑Mon Nov 01, 2021 9:12 am Are you sure current subscribers aren't grandfathered in to the price they signed up at? I thought they'd done that in the past.
If that's the case then they should make this an add-on service. I'm a happy manual only user, and I think that makes it a better product as in improves ones connection to the budget. And I don't trust the aggregators enough to give them my login credentials against my financial institutions' terms of service.Soon2BXProgrammer wrote: ↑Mon Nov 01, 2021 9:00 am Part of the issue is the fees that account aggregators charge. That part of the software is effectively a pass through cost. I don't know what they get charged, I just know it isn't insignificant.
I use a different piece of software that has two pricing tiers.. to have account aggregation its an additional $25/month, and thats basically the only extra feature. I spoke with the development team, and they basically said the aggregation software is expense because of the same exact reason we don't like subscriptions, they can only buy a subscription to it...
Earned 43 (and counting) credit hours of financial planning related education from a regionally accredited university, but I am not your advisor.
Re: YNAB doubles it’s prices for legacy subscribers
That sounds really rough. I use a free app called daily budget. You set a monthly income number and manually enter your purchases. At the end of the month you can see a spending summary of spending by category. Works for me, and free is nice
Crom laughs at your Four Winds
-
- Posts: 1879
- Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2015 2:14 pm
Re: YNAB doubles it’s prices for legacy subscribers
Isn't your time of manual input worth more than $90?winterfan wrote: ↑Mon Nov 01, 2021 8:39 am I bought the downloadable software and liked it all right, but then a year later they moved to the subscription model. I'm OK with buying something once, but I really can't stand subscription services. I switched to doing my current budget with my own spreadsheet. It works fine. I wouldn't spend $90.
Re: YNAB doubles it’s prices for legacy subscribers
+1! Totally agree. Happy to pay them for software that is continually improving!Hoosier CPA wrote: ↑Mon Nov 01, 2021 8:39 am Of all my subscriptions, it's probably the one I mind paying the least - it's a huge timesaver and organizer for our family. The company doesn't sell your data, is reliable, continues to get updated, etc.
I wasn't a legacy customer though so the increase wasn't that bad.
Re: YNAB doubles it’s prices for legacy subscribers
For me, no. It takes about 10 seconds to add a purchase i to my appwfrobinette wrote: ↑Mon Nov 01, 2021 9:30 amIsn't your time of manual input worth more than $90?winterfan wrote: ↑Mon Nov 01, 2021 8:39 am I bought the downloadable software and liked it all right, but then a year later they moved to the subscription model. I'm OK with buying something once, but I really can't stand subscription services. I switched to doing my current budget with my own spreadsheet. It works fine. I wouldn't spend $90.
Crom laughs at your Four Winds
Re: YNAB doubles it’s prices for legacy subscribers
I agree with all of the comments above that their is a business rational to subscription software services AND that YNAB is very valuable to our family. But we have 3 subscriptions (parents plus a 20+16 year old) so the increase in cost is substantial. They need some kind of family subscription price. Also, a 10% legacy discount is pretty insignificant when the base amount rises 100%.
As a larger comment, do we really need all of these subscription services???? Even YNAB. Have we complicated our lives so much that our tolerance for even the slightest inconvenience drives us into the arms of a million companies more than happy to drain dollar and cents from one’s earnings just so we can avoid any and all hassle??
As a larger comment, do we really need all of these subscription services???? Even YNAB. Have we complicated our lives so much that our tolerance for even the slightest inconvenience drives us into the arms of a million companies more than happy to drain dollar and cents from one’s earnings just so we can avoid any and all hassle??
Re: YNAB doubles it’s prices for legacy subscribers
Doesn't YNAB realize that its legacy subscribers are on a budget?
The closest helping hand is at the end of your own arm.
- SmileyFace
- Posts: 9184
- Joined: Wed Feb 19, 2014 9:11 am
Re: YNAB doubles it’s prices for legacy subscribers
LOL. YNABBIDHTBTO(You Need A Budget, But It Doesn't Have To Be That One)SmileyFace wrote: ↑Mon Nov 01, 2021 10:21 amLOL.
I switched to JNAS (Just Need A Spreadsheet).
For others - mint may be a fine alternative.
rolls right off the tongue
Re: YNAB doubles it’s prices for legacy subscribers
Not to me. I can buy my kid a really nice pair of winter boots (or whatever) instead. We don't have that many transactions go through our account anyway.wfrobinette wrote: ↑Mon Nov 01, 2021 9:30 amIsn't your time of manual input worth more than $90?winterfan wrote: ↑Mon Nov 01, 2021 8:39 am I bought the downloadable software and liked it all right, but then a year later they moved to the subscription model. I'm OK with buying something once, but I really can't stand subscription services. I switched to doing my current budget with my own spreadsheet. It works fine. I wouldn't spend $90.
-
- Posts: 509
- Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 3:11 pm
- Location: North Carolina, USA
Re: YNAB doubles it’s prices for legacy subscribers
Out of curiosity, I googled YNAB and see what it is.
Looks like a waste of good money. And it appears that soon, it will be a waste of even more good money.
There's nothing new about budgeting and spending plans. I would suggest eliminating the expense of YNAB would be first on my list of saving money. Simple.
Looks like a waste of good money. And it appears that soon, it will be a waste of even more good money.
There's nothing new about budgeting and spending plans. I would suggest eliminating the expense of YNAB would be first on my list of saving money. Simple.
Re: YNAB doubles it’s prices for legacy subscribers
I will continue paying my $0 to Mint. This much per year for YNAB or any other similar service I think is absurd.
- White Coat Investor
- Posts: 17413
- Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 8:11 pm
- Location: Greatest Snow On Earth
Re: YNAB doubles it’s prices for legacy subscribers
If less than half of people leave, YNAB comes out ahead. Seems like a business risk worth taking to me.
1) Invest you must 2) Time is your friend 3) Impulse is your enemy |
4) Basic arithmetic works 5) Stick to simplicity 6) Stay the course
Re: YNAB doubles it’s prices for legacy subscribers
Right, and arguably you save on customer service with fewer customers, less new install problems, etc. etc.White Coat Investor wrote: ↑Mon Nov 01, 2021 1:01 pm If less than half of people leave, YNAB comes out ahead. Seems like a business risk worth taking to me.
- slow n steady
- Posts: 388
- Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2011 1:54 pm
Re: YNAB doubles it’s prices for legacy subscribers
I really don't like subscriptions, yet I have no problem paying YNAB. I have gotten rid of Amazon Prime, Netflix, and will be getting rid of Disney Plus. Still keeping YNAB.Hoosier CPA wrote: ↑Mon Nov 01, 2021 8:39 am Of all my subscriptions, it's probably the one I mind paying the least - it's a huge timesaver and organizer for our family. The company doesn't sell your data, is reliable, continues to get updated, etc.
I wasn't a legacy customer though so the increase wasn't that bad.
I went without YNAB for almost a year and I have no doubt I spent thousands more than I would have otherwise. I don't like to admit it because I think of myself as a super rational spender, but the numbers didn't lie.
Re: YNAB doubles it’s prices for legacy subscribers
My subscription just renewed last month... I guess I'll use it for the next year, but I will be re-evaluating after that. I know I can reproduce the same results with a spreadsheet or other service, but YNAB makes it all very easy. There will be some switching costs and my wife has an easier time using a webapp than a spreadsheet.
Re: YNAB doubles it’s prices for legacy subscribers
I'm very pro subscription. Subscriptions typically allow smart organized people to come out ahead. All of those free trials, get so many months for 50% off, etc, are subsidized by people mindlessly paying for things they rarely use. Ironically, YNAB is instrumental to me starting and stopping subscriptions, I have all future renewals scheduled and I can cancel before they renew without issue. You can't game it with YNAB, but that's because it's too valuable to cancel, which is fair.
I can subscribe to Apple TV+ for one month, watch everything of interest, and cancel. Total cost is $5. This is only possible because of all the silly people paying every month whether they use it or not.
Re: YNAB doubles it’s prices for legacy subscribers
I think the issue for most of use grandfathered users is we were promised a locked in price of $45/year or $50/year and suddenly they are saying we were only promised a 10% discount. I've used YNAB since 2011 and was an early adopter of the SAAS version. I'm definitely going to look at alternatives before my renewal in February. The product is good, probably worth the $90 or $100/year but going back on a promise makes me not want to renew at any price.
Re: YNAB doubles it’s prices for legacy subscribers
Never understood why anyone would pay for YNAB when free services like Mint and Personal Capital are available. And if you don’t want to use Mint or Personal Capital, it seems to me easy enough to create your own spreadsheets.
-
- Posts: 4074
- Joined: Fri Jan 29, 2016 11:40 am
Re: YNAB doubles it’s prices for legacy subscribers
Because I don't want a kludged-together set of spreadsheets. I want an app that "just works" because I am busy enough with work and kids as it is. But seeing as how it's basically a fixed set of features for me I'm not likely to spend $90/year on it... That's more than Office costs!
-
- Posts: 4074
- Joined: Fri Jan 29, 2016 11:40 am
Re: YNAB doubles it’s prices for legacy subscribers
So far this year we have 1,353 transactions in YNAB. At ten seconds each that's four hours of data entry, and I doubt ten seconds is accurate, even if I've saved all the receipts which I rarely do.muffins14 wrote: ↑Mon Nov 01, 2021 9:45 amFor me, no. It takes about 10 seconds to add a purchase i to my appwfrobinette wrote: ↑Mon Nov 01, 2021 9:30 amIsn't your time of manual input worth more than $90?winterfan wrote: ↑Mon Nov 01, 2021 8:39 am I bought the downloadable software and liked it all right, but then a year later they moved to the subscription model. I'm OK with buying something once, but I really can't stand subscription services. I switched to doing my current budget with my own spreadsheet. It works fine. I wouldn't spend $90.
Manual entry isn't any fun either, but this sudden 100% increase is awful.
Re: YNAB doubles it’s prices for legacy subscribers
Why not raise it to 200 and half 1/4 the customers?:) They are making a bet they don't lose over half their customers AND that new customer acquisition doesn't slow to a trickle. 90 bucks seems excessive for the value of this type of software but the market will speak about what is considered acceptable.Lastrun wrote: ↑Mon Nov 01, 2021 1:11 pmRight, and arguably you save on customer service with fewer customers, less new install problems, etc. etc.White Coat Investor wrote: ↑Mon Nov 01, 2021 1:01 pm If less than half of people leave, YNAB comes out ahead. Seems like a business risk worth taking to me.
- cflannagan
- Posts: 1208
- Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2007 11:44 am
- Location: Working Remotely
Re: YNAB doubles it’s prices for legacy subscribers
Can't imagine doing that for every single transaction for us, a family of 4. Going to get extremely tedious, fast.
I heart automatic transaction downloading.
Looked at mine. Roughly 1,038. And yeah, no, it's not going to take 10 seconds each. Will be more for some transactions. As mentioned, entering every single transaction will get old and tedious very fast.dukeblue219 wrote: ↑Mon Nov 01, 2021 2:55 pm
So far this year we have 1,353 transactions in YNAB. At ten seconds each that's four hours of data entry, and I doubt ten seconds is accurate, even if I've saved all the receipts which I rarely do.
Manual entry isn't any fun either, but this sudden 100% increase is awful.
+1. This is coming from someone who used to budget the spreadsheet way. YNAB is a huge timesaver.dukeblue219 wrote: ↑Mon Nov 01, 2021 2:52 pmBecause I don't want a kludged-together set of spreadsheets. I want an app that "just works" because I am busy enough with work and kids as it is. But seeing as how it's basically a fixed set of features for me I'm not likely to spend $90/year on it... That's more than Office costs!
Also clearly Jags4186 doesn't seem to understand why YNAB isn't the same as Mint & Personal Capital. Mint & PC is not at all remotely anything even close to an envelope-based budgeting system (yes, I've used both Mint & PC) - so that was a very weird comparison to make.
Last edited by cflannagan on Mon Nov 01, 2021 3:56 pm, edited 5 times in total.
Re: YNAB doubles it’s prices for legacy subscribers
Should be renamed "YNNABB". You now need a bigger budget.
Another vote for just using a simple, one-page, spreadsheet. Easy, quick, and good enough.
Of course, I'm not one to add every receipt. Enough accuracy can be had by scanning cc and bank statements to know where the budget stands. I mostly use the spreadsheet for general planning, not so much for looking back in excruciating detail.
Another vote for just using a simple, one-page, spreadsheet. Easy, quick, and good enough.
Of course, I'm not one to add every receipt. Enough accuracy can be had by scanning cc and bank statements to know where the budget stands. I mostly use the spreadsheet for general planning, not so much for looking back in excruciating detail.
Re: YNAB doubles it’s prices for legacy subscribers
We had YNAB 3 and were close enough to the release of YNAB 4 that we got it for free. When the model changed to subscription, we stayed with YNAB 4. Although it has helped us to reach more financial milestones, it would be nice if there was a one-time purchase option with no aggregation, and then a subscription model for those who want that functionality. But neither Jesse nor anyone else at YNAB asked my opinion. And my partner loves the reports with the totals on our net worth and assets...I think that's been a key with respect to his keeping financially focused as well. So long as YNAB 4 continues to work, we'll keep using it.
Alternative to YNAB
Old fart who does three index stock funds, baby.
Re: YNAB doubles it’s prices for legacy subscribers
Mvelopes provides a similar service, and actually predates YNAB:
https://www.mvelopes.com/
Their basic plan with importer is $6/month.
The interface isn’t as nice as YNAB, for sure. Though it took a big step up 1-2 years ago when they FINALLY dumped Flash. I use them because I paid for a ‘lifetime’ account around 15-20 years ago. Seemed steep at $400 back then, but now that’s less than $2.50 per month and I’m still milking it.
https://www.mvelopes.com/
Their basic plan with importer is $6/month.
The interface isn’t as nice as YNAB, for sure. Though it took a big step up 1-2 years ago when they FINALLY dumped Flash. I use them because I paid for a ‘lifetime’ account around 15-20 years ago. Seemed steep at $400 back then, but now that’s less than $2.50 per month and I’m still milking it.
- cflannagan
- Posts: 1208
- Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2007 11:44 am
- Location: Working Remotely
Re: Alternative to YNAB
Might check out - is it an envelope-based budgeting system?Bogle7 wrote: ↑Mon Nov 01, 2021 3:56 pm I like/use Moneyspire.
https://www.moneyspire.com/purchase/
Am not a power user.
Someone on Reddit also suggesting checking out Buckets. which to my understanding is using an envelope-based budgeting system. $49 lifetime (but as the dev explained, one is locked in to that "major version", the dev might release v2, which will have a separate lifetime cost, and so on)
Re: YNAB doubles it’s prices for legacy subscribers
Yea I mean…I haven’t looked at YNAB for a while but when I did check it out based on numerous recommendations I didn’t see what advantage it offered. Perhaps if you are someone living paycheck to paycheck it makes sense…but if you already have your financial house in order I failed to see what it brought to the table a simple, single spreadsheet…or even mental accounting didn’t.dukeblue219 wrote: ↑Mon Nov 01, 2021 2:52 pmBecause I don't want a kludged-together set of spreadsheets. I want an app that "just works" because I am busy enough with work and kids as it is. But seeing as how it's basically a fixed set of features for me I'm not likely to spend $90/year on it... That's more than Office costs!
- cflannagan
- Posts: 1208
- Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2007 11:44 am
- Location: Working Remotely
Re: YNAB doubles it’s prices for legacy subscribers
Both "living paycheck to paycheck", FIRE types, and everything in between (ie myself, having assets at 20x of my annual expenses) uses YNAB. Pre-YNAB, I had only a "rough" estimate of what my annual expenses were. Post-YNAB, I had my annual expenses down to the penny, and now have much higher degree of confidence in my FIRE number. And that's not the primary reason why I'm using YNAB either.Jags4186 wrote: ↑Mon Nov 01, 2021 4:22 pm Yea I mean…I haven’t looked at YNAB for a while but when I did check it out based on numerous recommendations I didn’t see what advantage it offered. Perhaps if you are someone living paycheck to paycheck it makes sense…but if you already have your financial house in order I failed to see what it brought to the table a simple, single spreadsheet…or even mental accounting didn’t.
Just because others see value in YNAB, doesn't mean you have to see the value in YNAB too.
Last edited by cflannagan on Mon Nov 01, 2021 4:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: YNAB doubles it’s prices for legacy subscribers
Obviously others see value in it. I don’t see the value in it—not $45 and certainly not $90. I just would suggest people who do see value in it try to figure out what that value is, and if it can be achieved for free and minimal hassle. In my case, it was.cflannagan wrote: ↑Mon Nov 01, 2021 4:28 pmBoth "living paycheck to paycheck", FIRE types, and everything in between (ie myself, having assets at 20x of my annual expenses) uses YNAB. Pre-YNAB, I had only a "rough" estimate of what my annual expenses were. Post-YNAB, I had my annual expenses down to the penny, and now have much higher degree of confidence in my FIRE number.Jags4186 wrote: ↑Mon Nov 01, 2021 4:22 pm Yea I mean…I haven’t looked at YNAB for a while but when I did check it out based on numerous recommendations I didn’t see what advantage it offered. Perhaps if you are someone living paycheck to paycheck it makes sense…but if you already have your financial house in order I failed to see what it brought to the table a simple, single spreadsheet…or even mental accounting didn’t.
Just because others see value in YNAB, doesn't mean you have to see the value in YNAB too.
Re: YNAB doubles it’s prices for legacy subscribers
How many seconds of TV did you watch, and how many seconds were you waiting for pasta water to boil etc? The time comes from somewhere, yes, but I’m sure we all waste a minute or so per day that could be utilized in some other waydukeblue219 wrote: ↑Mon Nov 01, 2021 2:55 pmSo far this year we have 1,353 transactions in YNAB. At ten seconds each that's four hours of data entry, and I doubt ten seconds is accurate, even if I've saved all the receipts which I rarely do.muffins14 wrote: ↑Mon Nov 01, 2021 9:45 amFor me, no. It takes about 10 seconds to add a purchase i to my appwfrobinette wrote: ↑Mon Nov 01, 2021 9:30 amIsn't your time of manual input worth more than $90?winterfan wrote: ↑Mon Nov 01, 2021 8:39 am I bought the downloadable software and liked it all right, but then a year later they moved to the subscription model. I'm OK with buying something once, but I really can't stand subscription services. I switched to doing my current budget with my own spreadsheet. It works fine. I wouldn't spend $90.
Manual entry isn't any fun either, but this sudden 100% increase is awful.
Edited to add: I see the manual entry as a feature, because spending requires me to record it in the app, so it forces you to acknowledge the spending if you have the habit to record it, and in turn that should encourage less spending
Last edited by muffins14 on Mon Nov 01, 2021 4:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Crom laughs at your Four Winds
- cflannagan
- Posts: 1208
- Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2007 11:44 am
- Location: Working Remotely
Re: YNAB doubles it’s prices for legacy subscribers
Cool. I'm sure others got tons and tons of value out of something worth $45 or $90. I know I did.
My time is far, far too valuable to be wasted on entering transactions manually in a spreadsheet that has extremely limited reporting capabilities and nearly zero in terms of good visualizations of the overall financial picture. Over 1,000 transactions a year for a family of 4.
I would never make any assumptions about what kind of value a software program (or a web-based app) would offer to others and most certainly not make backhanded comments about it here. Ie: "Ohhh yeah, whoever uses YNAB must be living paycheck-to-paycheck". I learned of YNAB on a Financial Independence forum.
Re: YNAB doubles it’s prices for legacy subscribers
I didn’t say those who use it must be living paycheck-to-paycheck, I said,cflannagan wrote: ↑Mon Nov 01, 2021 4:43 pmCool. I'm sure others got tons and tons of value out of something worth $45 or $90. I know I did.
My time is far, far too valuable to be wasted on entering transactions manually in a spreadsheet that has extremely limited reporting capabilities and nearly zero in terms of good visualizations of the overall financial picture. Over 1,000 transactions a year for a family of 4.
I would never make any assumptions about what kind of value a software program (or a web-based app) would offer to others and most certainly not make backhanded comments about it here. Ie: "Ohhh yeah, whoever uses YNAB must be living paycheck-to-paycheck". I learned of YNAB on a Financial Independence forum.
So, again, maybe there are some features I don’t use or aren’t aware of, but if you want to pay someone $90/yr to record all your transactions be aware there are free options out there that do the same thing.Perhaps if you are someone living paycheck to paycheck it makes sense… but if you already have your financial house in order I failed to see what it brought to the table…
Last edited by Jags4186 on Mon Nov 01, 2021 4:50 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- cflannagan
- Posts: 1208
- Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2007 11:44 am
- Location: Working Remotely
Re: YNAB doubles it’s prices for legacy subscribers
Well, that's still making an assumption. I can see myself using YNAB post-FIRE, or at least something similar (Buckets, MVelopes).
When one is drawing down on his assets (deaccumulating), wouldn't it be a good idea to keep tabs on where the money's going? Have access to good reports on overall financial picture of that, something that most spreadsheets won't be able to do unless one spends significant amount of time refining the spreadsheet over time, or make a copy of somebody else's spreadsheet template. And even then, spreadsheets still are pretty inflexible in general.
To borrow your words, I didn't get my "financial house in order" until I discovered YNAB.
Spreadsheets, Mint, Personal Capital, etc failed majorly on that front for me. So different strokes for each of us I guess.
Last edited by cflannagan on Mon Nov 01, 2021 5:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- White Coat Investor
- Posts: 17413
- Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 8:11 pm
- Location: Greatest Snow On Earth
Re: YNAB doubles it’s prices for legacy subscribers
In my experience Bogleheads (including me) overestimate how sensitive the average consumer is to prices, especially on the low end. You're right they're making a bet. Sounds like you wouldn't make it if you were Jesse. I probably would. I'll be surprised if it doesn't pay off. People are sticky.randomguy wrote: ↑Mon Nov 01, 2021 3:38 pmWhy not raise it to 200 and half 1/4 the customers?:) They are making a bet they don't lose over half their customers AND that new customer acquisition doesn't slow to a trickle. 90 bucks seems excessive for the value of this type of software but the market will speak about what is considered acceptable.Lastrun wrote: ↑Mon Nov 01, 2021 1:11 pmRight, and arguably you save on customer service with fewer customers, less new install problems, etc. etc.White Coat Investor wrote: ↑Mon Nov 01, 2021 1:01 pm If less than half of people leave, YNAB comes out ahead. Seems like a business risk worth taking to me.
1) Invest you must 2) Time is your friend 3) Impulse is your enemy |
4) Basic arithmetic works 5) Stick to simplicity 6) Stay the course
Re: YNAB doubles it’s prices for legacy subscribers
I switched from YNAB to Simplifi by quicken a couple of years ago because it kept having problems staying linked to some of my accounts. I actually like it better, but it doesn’t have quite as many features as YNAB, but it’s still less than $40 a year. Give the 30 days free access a try.
https://www.quicken.com/simplifi/
https://www.quicken.com/simplifi/
Re: YNAB doubles it’s prices for legacy subscribers
Bought YNAB 4 a couple of months before the subscription service started. I didn't need any of the new features so I never upgraded. Seven years later I can still do everything I need for budgeting with YNAB 4. One time purchase, best money I ever spent. Too bad you can't buy YNAB 4 any longer. I honestly think manually entering the transactions allows you to better understand where your money is going.
-
- Posts: 4074
- Joined: Fri Jan 29, 2016 11:40 am
Re: YNAB doubles it’s prices for legacy subscribers
I get where you're coming from, and a single person or retired couple can probably pull that off. I think for the bulk of working people with families it's a lot to ask that they record transactions manually in real time.
If I'm getting gas, stopping at the grocery store, picking up the kids from soccer, ordering household items on Amazon (which breaks it up into multiple orders), and then two bills auto paid on a given day there's zero chance I'm going to spend the evening remembering what all I bought and typing it into excel.
Being able to review two weeks of transactions that were downloaded and auto-categorized is worth money. I can view reports at the end of month and see where I was short or what needs to be adjusted next month. I just don't think it's worth $90 a year considering the exact same features were $45 this year and the last few years, and those features are basically the same as what used to be standalone software. I have no idea what I'm actually paying more for.
Mint can do some of it but not with the envelope budgeting that I rely on. Certainly YNAB isn't the only budgeting tool in the world, but it's the only one that does exactly what it does.