"Open Social Security" calculator: feature requests, bug reports, etc

Non-investing personal finance issues including insurance, credit, real estate, taxes, employment and legal issues such as trusts and wills
User avatar
Topic Author
ObliviousInvestor
Posts: 3477
Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 9:32 am
Contact:

Re: "Open Social Security" calculator: feature requests, bug reports, etc

Post by ObliviousInvestor » Thu Nov 29, 2018 6:37 am

jmk wrote:
Wed Nov 28, 2018 11:24 pm
It might just be me, but is anyone else confused by the figures in the generated "Year-by-Year Benefit Amounts" table?

After reading the background info carefully I'm thinking these figures represent future real dollars anchored the year you'd turn 62, or perhaps the year you start getting benefits. In other words, not in current dollars. But this is never stated outright. I'm wondering if it would help to add a simple sentence to the explanation above the table explaining what year anchors the figures?
The table and the PV calculation are completely separate.

In the PV calculation, future dollars must be discounted. (And they are probability-weighted as well.)

For ease of understanding, the table simply reports current year dollars -- not discounted and not probability-weighted. Otherwise, for example, a person's retirement benefit would be shown as a slightly smaller amount each year than the previous year, which I suspect would confuse many people.
Mike Piper, author/blogger

jmk
Posts: 395
Joined: Tue Nov 01, 2011 7:48 pm

Re: "Open Social Security" calculator: feature requests, bug reports, etc

Post by jmk » Thu Nov 29, 2018 12:37 pm

ObliviousInvestor wrote:
Thu Nov 29, 2018 6:37 am
jmk wrote:
Wed Nov 28, 2018 11:24 pm
It might just be me, but is anyone else confused by the figures in the generated "Year-by-Year Benefit Amounts" table?
For ease of understanding, the table simply reports current year dollars -- not discounted and not probability-weighted. Otherwise, for example, a person's retirement benefit would be shown as a slightly smaller amount each year than the previous year, which I suspect would confuse many people.
Which totally makes sense. My suggestion is to add a short sentence that makes that clear, e.g. "Figures are in current dollars."

User avatar
Topic Author
ObliviousInvestor
Posts: 3477
Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 9:32 am
Contact:

Re: "Open Social Security" calculator: feature requests, bug reports, etc

Post by ObliviousInvestor » Thu Nov 29, 2018 2:35 pm

jmk wrote:
Thu Nov 29, 2018 12:37 pm
My suggestion is to add a short sentence that makes that clear, e.g. "Figures are in current dollars."
Noted. Thank you.

After the current big piece of functionality is finished, there's a laundry list of things I intend to improve as far as documentation/interface.
Mike Piper, author/blogger

capemaydiamond
Posts: 43
Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2012 9:32 pm

Re: "Open Social Security" calculator: feature requests, bug reports, etc

Post by capemaydiamond » Thu Dec 06, 2018 9:27 pm

Mike, would you explain in simple terms, maybe give some examples, of the difference between solving for max PV vs solving for longevity risk? What are some examples where choosing the recommended strategy (ie largest PV) would not get you the best in terms of longevity? Much of this discussion is over my head and I don't need to understand on such a deep level. Just need to know how to think about what your calculator is telling me vs wanting the best solution for longevity risk. FWIW, I am 63 and my spouse is almost 66. Your calculator says our best strategy is for her to file at 67 and for me to wait until 70. I am the higher earner. We also tried her filing at 66 and me at 70. The PV difference is only $580 less. But her annual payment would be almost $1000 less. Are one or both of those factors why the best strategy is for her to wait a year until age 67? Thanks.

User avatar
Topic Author
ObliviousInvestor
Posts: 3477
Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 9:32 am
Contact:

Re: "Open Social Security" calculator: feature requests, bug reports, etc

Post by ObliviousInvestor » Thu Dec 06, 2018 9:46 pm

capemaydiamond wrote:
Thu Dec 06, 2018 9:27 pm
Mike, would you explain in simple terms, maybe give some examples, of the difference between solving for max PV vs solving for longevity risk? What are some examples where choosing the recommended strategy (ie largest PV) would not get you the best in terms of longevity? Much of this discussion is over my head and I don't need to understand on such a deep level. Just need to know how to think about what your calculator is telling me vs wanting the best solution for longevity risk.
There is no such thing as "solving for longevity risk" per se. Longevity risk is the risk of living a very long time. And there's no real end-cap on it, if we aren't considering probabilities.

In other words, with respect to minimizing longevity risk, the optimal solution is always for each person to max out their benefit fully (i.e., waiting until 70 to file for retirement, or waiting until FRA to file for spousal). Because in a live-a-super-duper-long-time scenario, the highest benefit works out best (because you'd be collecting it for such a long time).

A probability-weighted PV calculation (such as that done by this calculator) considers the probability of living for such a long time. So, for example, the "both spouses live until 110" scenario is included, but it gets very little weight in the calculation, because it's so unlikely.
capemaydiamond wrote:
Thu Dec 06, 2018 9:27 pm
FWIW, I am 63 and my spouse is almost 66. Your calculator says our best strategy is for her to file at 67 and for me to wait until 70. I am the higher earner. We also tried her filing at 66 and me at 70. The PV difference is only $580 less. But her annual payment would be almost $1000 less. Are one or both of those factors why the best strategy is for her to wait a year until age 67? Thanks.
The decision for the lower earner typically isn't nearly as impactful as the decision for the higher earner. The reason it's saying for her to wait until 67 is simply, "because that's what happens to give the highest probability-weighted present value." But as you noticed, varying her filing age doesn't make a dramatic difference. (That is, the higher benefit at 67 is almost offset by the fact that it would be collected for slightly fewer months.)
Mike Piper, author/blogger

capemaydiamond
Posts: 43
Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2012 9:32 pm

Re: "Open Social Security" calculator: feature requests, bug reports, etc

Post by capemaydiamond » Thu Dec 06, 2018 10:06 pm

capemaydiamond wrote:
Thu Dec 06, 2018 9:27 pm
FWIW, I am 63 and my spouse is almost 66. Your calculator says our best strategy is for her to file at 67 and for me to wait until 70. I am the higher earner. We also tried her filing at 66 and me at 70. The PV difference is only $580 less. But her annual payment would be almost $1000 less. Are one or both of those factors why the best strategy is for her to wait a year until age 67? Thanks.
The decision for the lower earner typically isn't nearly as impactful as the decision for the higher earner. The reason it's saying for her to wait until 67 is simply, "because that's what happens to give the highest probability-weighted present value." But as you noticed, varying her filing age doesn't make a dramatic difference. (That is, the higher benefit at 67 is almost offset by the fact that it would be collected for slightly fewer months.)
[/quote]

Thanks. Don't know if I replied properly, including only the final quote. Anyway, your response is helpful. But it is difficult to grasp that my spouse claiming 1 year earlier, and an amount that is $1000 less, would only result in a $500 reduction in the PV as compared to the best strategy. Her claiming amount at 67 with the best strategy is only $12,800 per year so losing $1000 every year for claiming one year early seems like it should be quite significant.....

Thanks for your good work.

User avatar
Topic Author
ObliviousInvestor
Posts: 3477
Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 9:32 am
Contact:

Re: "Open Social Security" calculator: feature requests, bug reports, etc

Post by ObliviousInvestor » Thu Dec 06, 2018 10:42 pm

capemaydiamond wrote:it is difficult to grasp that my spouse claiming 1 year earlier, and an amount that is $1000 less, would only result in a $500 reduction in the PV as compared to the best strategy. Her claiming amount at 67 with the best strategy is only $12,800 per year so losing $1000 every year for claiming one year early seems like it should be quite significant
As the spouse with the lower PIA, when she delays benefits it increases the amount that you will receive (as a couple) as long as both of you are still alive. This first-to-die joint life expectancy is shorter than many people intuitively expect, because most people think in terms of individual life expectancies -- but this expected length of time is (in most cases) significantly shorter than the shorter of the two individual life expectancies.

(Overall point being again that, in this case, the higher/lower benefit from your wife delaying or not delaying another year is approximately offset by the difference in number of months for which that benefit will be received.)
Mike Piper, author/blogger

vtMaps
Posts: 436
Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2008 12:05 pm
Location: central Vermont

Re: "Open Social Security" calculator: feature requests, bug reports, etc

Post by vtMaps » Fri Dec 07, 2018 4:20 am

capemaydiamond wrote:
Thu Dec 06, 2018 10:06 pm
But it is difficult to grasp that my spouse claiming 1 year earlier, and an amount that is $1000 less, would only result in a $500 reduction in the PV as compared to the best strategy.
In addition to what ObliviousInvestor explained, there are also other factors at work here... The calculator assumes that by claiming one year earlier, you didn't spend down about $12k of your retirement savings. The calculator assumes that $12k is invested and growing.

--vtMaps
The optimist proclaims that we live in the best of all possible worlds; and the pessimist fears this is true. --James Branch Cabell

capemaydiamond
Posts: 43
Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2012 9:32 pm

Re: "Open Social Security" calculator: feature requests, bug reports, etc

Post by capemaydiamond » Fri Dec 07, 2018 6:30 am

vtMaps wrote:
Fri Dec 07, 2018 4:20 am
capemaydiamond wrote:
Thu Dec 06, 2018 10:06 pm
But it is difficult to grasp that my spouse claiming 1 year earlier, and an amount that is $1000 less, would only result in a $500 reduction in the PV as compared to the best strategy.
In addition to what ObliviousInvestor explained, there are also other factors at work here... The calculator assumes that by claiming one year earlier, you didn't spend down about $12k of your retirement savings. The calculator assumes that $12k is invested and growing.

--vtMaps
The calculator factors in the growth of unspent investments because one is collecting that amount in social security?

User avatar
Topic Author
ObliviousInvestor
Posts: 3477
Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 9:32 am
Contact:

Re: "Open Social Security" calculator: feature requests, bug reports, etc

Post by ObliviousInvestor » Fri Dec 07, 2018 6:43 am

capemaydiamond wrote:
Fri Dec 07, 2018 6:30 am
vtMaps wrote:
Fri Dec 07, 2018 4:20 am
capemaydiamond wrote:
Thu Dec 06, 2018 10:06 pm
But it is difficult to grasp that my spouse claiming 1 year earlier, and an amount that is $1000 less, would only result in a $500 reduction in the PV as compared to the best strategy.
In addition to what ObliviousInvestor explained, there are also other factors at work here... The calculator assumes that by claiming one year earlier, you didn't spend down about $12k of your retirement savings. The calculator assumes that $12k is invested and growing.

--vtMaps
The calculator factors in the growth of unspent investments because one is collecting that amount in social security?
Yes, that is what any Social Security present value calculation is doing.
Mike Piper, author/blogger

Carl53
Posts: 1662
Joined: Sun Mar 07, 2010 8:26 pm

Re: "Open Social Security" calculator: feature requests, bug reports, etc

Post by Carl53 » Fri Dec 07, 2018 8:26 am

ObliviousInvestor wrote:
Fri Dec 07, 2018 6:43 am
capemaydiamond wrote:
Fri Dec 07, 2018 6:30 am
vtMaps wrote:
Fri Dec 07, 2018 4:20 am
capemaydiamond wrote:
Thu Dec 06, 2018 10:06 pm
But it is difficult to grasp that my spouse claiming 1 year earlier, and an amount that is $1000 less, would only result in a $500 reduction in the PV as compared to the best strategy.
In addition to what ObliviousInvestor explained, there are also other factors at work here... The calculator assumes that by claiming one year earlier, you didn't spend down about $12k of your retirement savings. The calculator assumes that $12k is invested and growing.

--vtMaps
The calculator factors in the growth of unspent investments because one is collecting that amount in social security?
Yes, that is what any Social Security present value calculation is doing.
Think about this scenario, where spouse might take own benefit at 66 or 67, of $12500 or $13500, for possibly 7 or 6 years if capemaydiamond has high enough earnings such that the spouse might switch to spousal benefits at that time. If they have no need of the additional income and as such are not spending down additional retirement funds the spouse would receive $87500 or $81000, with the $81000 being delayed a year in starting, prior to the switch. It seems hard to understand how the later smaller benefit would be better by $500 PV or by any amount. Of course capemaydiamond might not have that high of benefit, just larger than the spouse, such that the spouse will never switch to spousal benefits. In that case I could see that what capemaydiamond is stating might happen.

capemaydiamond
Posts: 43
Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2012 9:32 pm

Re: "Open Social Security" calculator: feature requests, bug reports, etc

Post by capemaydiamond » Fri Dec 07, 2018 10:59 pm

Carl53 wrote:
Fri Dec 07, 2018 8:26 am
ObliviousInvestor wrote:
Fri Dec 07, 2018 6:43 am
capemaydiamond wrote:
Fri Dec 07, 2018 6:30 am
vtMaps wrote:
Fri Dec 07, 2018 4:20 am
capemaydiamond wrote:
Thu Dec 06, 2018 10:06 pm
But it is difficult to grasp that my spouse claiming 1 year earlier, and an amount that is $1000 less, would only result in a $500 reduction in the PV as compared to the best strategy.
In addition to what ObliviousInvestor explained, there are also other factors at work here... The calculator assumes that by claiming one year earlier, you didn't spend down about $12k of your retirement savings. The calculator assumes that $12k is invested and growing.

--vtMaps
The calculator factors in the growth of unspent investments because one is collecting that amount in social security?
Yes, that is what any Social Security present value calculation is doing.
Think about this scenario, where spouse might take own benefit at 66 or 67, of $12500 or $13500, for possibly 7 or 6 years if capemaydiamond has high enough earnings such that the spouse might switch to spousal benefits at that time. If they have no need of the additional income and as such are not spending down additional retirement funds the spouse would receive $87500 or $81000, with the $81000 being delayed a year in starting, prior to the switch. It seems hard to understand how the later smaller benefit would be better by $500 PV or by any amount. Of course capemaydiamond might not have that high of benefit, just larger than the spouse, such that the spouse will never switch to spousal benefits. In that case I could see that what capemaydiamond is stating might happen.
Unfortunately my benefit is not more than double that of my spouse's, so a spousal benefit isn't viable for us.....

Carl53
Posts: 1662
Joined: Sun Mar 07, 2010 8:26 pm

Re: "Open Social Security" calculator: feature requests, bug reports, etc

Post by Carl53 » Fri Dec 14, 2018 6:09 am

I just reran our open social security scenario. Both of our birthdays are the same month but lower earning spouse is on the 2nd and i'm midmonth four years older. OSS recommends spouse filing for benefits in birth month with me taking restricted spousal in the same month. It recommends later me taking my own benefit at 70 with my spouse switching to spousal at that time. I totally agree with this determination.

I do question one of the numbers in the table of annual benefits. The spouse in the first year is shown receiving own benefits for (12-(birth month number))*reduced age 62 monthly benefit. That is what I expected for someone with a birthday on the 2nd. For me, not reaching 66 until mid-month, I see in the first year a likewise total: (12-(birth month number))* .5*spouses PIA. My prior understanding was that I would not be able to collect a benefit as a restricted spouse at FRA until the first full month that I was FRA, i.e. the birth number + 1 month. So I was thinking that my total for the first year would have been one month's less than shown by OSS or (12-(bmn+1))*.5 spouses PIA.

Does this have something to do with the dates of our birthdays? We were planning to have my spouse file for own benefits a few months prior to birthdate and then me file for my restricted spousal benefits a few days later with the expectation that my first benefits would not be received until a month after my spouse's first benefit.

Is my understanding messed up?

You Know What I Mean
Posts: 21
Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2018 9:27 am

Re: "Open Social Security" calculator: feature requests, bug reports, etc

Post by You Know What I Mean » Fri Dec 14, 2018 6:46 am

Yes, I think there is some confusion. You will be entitled to a full month of spousal benefit for the first month you reach FRA, even though your birthday is mid-month. However, the benefit for that month will actually be received the following month (Social Security benefits are paid in arrears.) Perhaps that is the source of the confusion.

User avatar
Topic Author
ObliviousInvestor
Posts: 3477
Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 9:32 am
Contact:

Re: "Open Social Security" calculator: feature requests, bug reports, etc

Post by ObliviousInvestor » Fri Dec 14, 2018 6:54 am

You Know What I Mean wrote:
Fri Dec 14, 2018 6:46 am
You will be entitled to a full month of spousal benefit for the first month you reach FRA, even though your birthday is mid-month.
Yes, this is the answer.

The "must be the age in question for the entire month" rule is only applicable at age 62. It only has to do with being eligible for a retirement or spousal benefit in the first place. The deemed filing rules include no such "for the entire month" provision.
Mike Piper, author/blogger

User avatar
WoodSpinner
Posts: 555
Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2017 1:15 pm

Re: "Open Social Security" calculator: feature requests, bug reports, etc

Post by WoodSpinner » Fri Jan 04, 2019 10:40 pm

First, let me thank you for such a great tool! Spent a good part of today running various scenarios and updating my planning worksheets. Results were slightly different then earlier runs with SSAnalyzer but seems consistent within its own runs. In addition the results highlighted an error in my earlier calculations of spousal benefit.

Wondering if it’s possible to get a deeper exposure to the PV calculations. Is there a way of dumping some type of table for the scenarios involved?

In my case SSAnalyzer suggested my wife wait to her FRA and suggested I delay to 70. Open Social Security recommended she take SS at 62 and for me to delay to 70. There was a relatively small difference in PV ($9,000 I think). Would love to get a better understanding of the underlying assumptions.

My assumption is that it relates to the using the mortality tables to weight future income streams.....

Thanks for the hard work and analysis! It’s a really helpful tool.

WoodSpinner

User avatar
Topic Author
ObliviousInvestor
Posts: 3477
Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 9:32 am
Contact:

Re: "Open Social Security" calculator: feature requests, bug reports, etc

Post by ObliviousInvestor » Fri Jan 04, 2019 10:46 pm

WoodSpinner wrote:
Fri Jan 04, 2019 10:40 pm
Wondering if it’s possible to get a deeper exposure to the PV calculations. Is there a way of dumping some type of table for the scenarios involved?
That's on the to-do list. Can't promise when though.

In the meantime, I can describe what the calculator is doing in each PV calc for a married couple (i.e., in the calculation of expected PV that is done for each set of claiming dates). You can look at the code as well of course.

Each year, it calculates the probability of:
1) Both PersonA and PersonB alive,
2) Only PersonA alive,
3) Only PersonB alive,
4) Neither PersonA nor PersonB alive.

Then it calculates what the family's total benefit would be in each of those four situations. And it probability-weights each of those four benefits to arrive at a probability-weighted benefit for the year. Then it discounts that amount.

As far as the mortality calculations, the calculator is doing the same math that #Cruncher does in his "Odds of Being Alive" spreadsheet, which you can find here:
http://eyebonds.info/downloads/pages/Od ... Alive.html
Mike Piper, author/blogger

User avatar
WoodSpinner
Posts: 555
Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2017 1:15 pm

Re: "Open Social Security" calculator: feature requests, bug reports, etc

Post by WoodSpinner » Sat Jan 05, 2019 12:44 am

Appreciate the prompt reply.

Only other suggestion is more from a Usabiluty perspective when using the Advanced Settimgs for married couples.

The selection and verbiage around the mortality table for the primary is not nearly as clear as fir the spouse. Minor nit, but would help.

Again, greaat tool! Definitely labor of love!

Would you like a donation to help with the costs? Have a favorite charity?

WoodSpinner

User avatar
Topic Author
ObliviousInvestor
Posts: 3477
Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 9:32 am
Contact:

Re: "Open Social Security" calculator: feature requests, bug reports, etc

Post by ObliviousInvestor » Sat Jan 05, 2019 7:49 am

WoodSpinner wrote:
Sat Jan 05, 2019 12:44 am
Only other suggestion is more from a Usability perspective when using the Advanced Settings for married couples.

The selection and verbiage around the mortality table for the primary is not nearly as clear as fir the spouse. Minor nit, but would help.
I'm not sure what you mean here. Would you mind elaborating?

The dropdown and the label for the dropdown (i.e., the bold wording "Mortality table") are coded to be identical for you/your spouse. Are you referring to something else? Or are they actually showing differently in your browser? (And if so, would you mind sharing what browser and OS you're using?)
Mike Piper, author/blogger

capemaydiamond
Posts: 43
Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2012 9:32 pm

Re: "Open Social Security" calculator: feature requests, bug reports, etc

Post by capemaydiamond » Sat Jan 05, 2019 11:42 am

Hi. I've run this a few times and in 11/2018 my spouse's best time to retire was at 66 yrs 9 months, on 12/6/18 it was 67 years, and today it's 67 yrs 1 month. Seems like as time goes on the 'best' date is getting pushed out. Does this reflect something about the mortality tables? Thanks.
Last edited by capemaydiamond on Sat Jan 05, 2019 1:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
WoodSpinner
Posts: 555
Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2017 1:15 pm

Re: "Open Social Security" calculator: feature requests, bug reports, etc

Post by WoodSpinner » Sat Jan 05, 2019 12:58 pm

ObliviousInvestor wrote:
Sat Jan 05, 2019 7:49 am
WoodSpinner wrote:
Sat Jan 05, 2019 12:44 am
Only other suggestion is more from a Usability perspective when using the Advanced Settings for married couples.

The selection and verbiage around the mortality table for the primary is not nearly as clear as fir the spouse. Minor nit, but would help.
I'm not sure what you mean here. Would you mind elaborating?

The dropdown and the label for the dropdown (i.e., the bold wording "Mortality table") are coded to be identical for you/your spouse. Are you referring to something else? Or are they actually showing differently in your browser? (And if so, would you mind sharing what browser and OS you're using?)
Mike,

Can’t seem to PM you a pan annotated PDF so let me try to describe.

The screen Shows....

Your information — reasonably clear
Your spouse information - also clear
Spouse Mortality table is in this section
Other inputs — this is where it can be improved....
Real discount rate — applies to all calculations
Assume SS is cut — applies to all calculations
Your Mortality tableShould be in the Your information section since it applies to me, not my spouse.

Does this help?

User avatar
Topic Author
ObliviousInvestor
Posts: 3477
Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 9:32 am
Contact:

Re: "Open Social Security" calculator: feature requests, bug reports, etc

Post by ObliviousInvestor » Sat Jan 05, 2019 1:16 pm

WoodSpinner wrote:
Sat Jan 05, 2019 12:58 pm
Your Mortality tableShould be in the Your information section since it applies to me, not my spouse.
Does this help?
Yes, this does help. The way it is coded, "Your mortality table" is in the "your information" section. So this is a display bug of some sort. Could you share what browser and OS you're using?
Mike Piper, author/blogger

User avatar
Topic Author
ObliviousInvestor
Posts: 3477
Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 9:32 am
Contact:

Re: "Open Social Security" calculator: feature requests, bug reports, etc

Post by ObliviousInvestor » Sat Jan 05, 2019 1:20 pm

capemaydiamond wrote:
Sat Jan 05, 2019 11:42 am
Hi. I've run this a few times and in 11/2018 my spouse's best time to retire was at 66 yrs 9 months, on 12/6/18 it was 67 years, and today it's 67 yrs 1 month. Seems like as time goes on the 'best' date is getting pushed out. Does this reflect something about the mortality tables?
More information (about the inputs you're using) would be needed to know for sure. But most likely it has to do with the discount rate changing as the yield on 20-year TIPS has come down somewhat.
Mike Piper, author/blogger

User avatar
WoodSpinner
Posts: 555
Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2017 1:15 pm

Re: "Open Social Security" calculator: feature requests, bug reports, etc

Post by WoodSpinner » Sun Jan 06, 2019 10:26 am

ObliviousInvestor wrote:
Sat Jan 05, 2019 1:16 pm
WoodSpinner wrote:
Sat Jan 05, 2019 12:58 pm
Your Mortality tableShould be in the Your information section since it applies to me, not my spouse.
Does this help?
Yes, this does help. The way it is coded, "Your mortality table" is in the "your information" section. So this is a display bug of some sort. Could you share what browser and OS you're using?
Safari on iPad and MacBook

User avatar
Topic Author
ObliviousInvestor
Posts: 3477
Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 9:32 am
Contact:

Re: "Open Social Security" calculator: feature requests, bug reports, etc

Post by ObliviousInvestor » Sun Jan 06, 2019 12:34 pm

WoodSpinner wrote:
Sun Jan 06, 2019 10:26 am
ObliviousInvestor wrote:
Sat Jan 05, 2019 1:16 pm
WoodSpinner wrote:
Sat Jan 05, 2019 12:58 pm
Your Mortality tableShould be in the Your information section since it applies to me, not my spouse.
Does this help?
Yes, this does help. The way it is coded, "Your mortality table" is in the "your information" section. So this is a display bug of some sort. Could you share what browser and OS you're using?
Safari on iPad and MacBook
Thank you. I'll take a look and see if I can figure out what's causing this.
Mike Piper, author/blogger

User avatar
Topic Author
ObliviousInvestor
Posts: 3477
Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 9:32 am
Contact:

Re: "Open Social Security" calculator: feature requests, bug reports, etc

Post by ObliviousInvestor » Thu Jan 10, 2019 9:52 am

WoodSpinner wrote:
Sun Jan 06, 2019 10:26 am
ObliviousInvestor wrote:
Sat Jan 05, 2019 1:16 pm
WoodSpinner wrote:
Sat Jan 05, 2019 12:58 pm
Your Mortality tableShould be in the Your information section since it applies to me, not my spouse.
Does this help?
Yes, this does help. The way it is coded, "Your mortality table" is in the "your information" section. So this is a display bug of some sort. Could you share what browser and OS you're using?
Safari on iPad and MacBook
I believe this display bug has been resolved.
Mike Piper, author/blogger

User avatar
Topic Author
ObliviousInvestor
Posts: 3477
Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 9:32 am
Contact:

Re: "Open Social Security" calculator: feature requests, bug reports, etc

Post by ObliviousInvestor » Thu Jan 10, 2019 9:55 am

Update: I just rolled out functionality for child benefits and child-in-care spousal benefits.

That's about 9 months of nearly full-time work on this project (~30 hours spent on it per week since April), and the calculator now does all of the major things that I had hoped for it to do. So I think I'll be taking a break for a bit, aside from maybe some small stuff here and there.
Mike Piper, author/blogger

User avatar
deanbrew
Posts: 1291
Joined: Wed Jul 21, 2010 12:05 pm
Location: The Keystone State

Re: "Open Social Security" calculator: feature requests, bug reports, etc

Post by deanbrew » Thu Jan 10, 2019 10:13 am

ObliviousInvestor wrote:
Thu Jan 10, 2019 9:55 am
Update: I just rolled out functionality for child benefits and child-in-care spousal benefits.

That's about 9 months of nearly full-time work on this project (~30 hours spent on it per week since April), and the calculator now does all of the major things that I had hoped for it to do. So I think I'll be taking a break for a bit, aside from maybe some small stuff here and there.
That's incredible. You've probably done the work of 10 government employees or government contractor workers on this project. Thank you for this very useful tool.
"The course of history shows that as the government grows, liberty decreases." Thomas Jefferson

User avatar
FiveK
Posts: 6001
Joined: Sun Mar 16, 2014 2:43 pm

Re: "Open Social Security" calculator: feature requests, bug reports, etc

Post by FiveK » Thu Jan 10, 2019 10:24 am

ObliviousInvestor wrote:
Thu Jan 10, 2019 9:55 am
That's about 9 months of nearly full-time work on this project (~30 hours spent on it per week since April), and the calculator now does all of the major things that I had hoped for it to do. So I think I'll be taking a break for a bit, aside from maybe some small stuff here and there.
And a well-deserved break indeed. Thank you!

User avatar
Topic Author
ObliviousInvestor
Posts: 3477
Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 9:32 am
Contact:

Re: "Open Social Security" calculator: feature requests, bug reports, etc

Post by ObliviousInvestor » Thu Jan 10, 2019 10:35 am

Forgot to mention: today's update also includes functionality for retroactive applications. (That is, the calculator will now recommend a retroactive application, when such is possible and would be useful.)
Mike Piper, author/blogger

User avatar
WoodSpinner
Posts: 555
Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2017 1:15 pm

Re: "Open Social Security" calculator: feature requests, bug reports, etc

Post by WoodSpinner » Thu Jan 10, 2019 3:56 pm

ObliviousInvestor wrote:
Thu Jan 10, 2019 9:52 am
WoodSpinner wrote:
Sun Jan 06, 2019 10:26 am
ObliviousInvestor wrote:
Sat Jan 05, 2019 1:16 pm
WoodSpinner wrote:
Sat Jan 05, 2019 12:58 pm
Your Mortality tableShould be in the Your information section since it applies to me, not my spouse.
Does this help?
Yes, this does help. The way it is coded, "Your mortality table" is in the "your information" section. So this is a display bug of some sort. Could you share what browser and OS you're using?
Safari on iPad and MacBook
I believe this display bug has been resolved.
Looks good to me ! Many thanks!

MtnBiker
Posts: 161
Joined: Sun Nov 16, 2014 4:43 pm

Re: "Open Social Security" calculator: feature requests, bug reports, etc

Post by MtnBiker » Mon Jan 14, 2019 1:40 pm

ObliviousInvestor wrote:
Thu Jan 10, 2019 9:55 am
Update: I just rolled out functionality for child benefits and child-in-care spousal benefits.

That's about 9 months of nearly full-time work on this project (~30 hours spent on it per week since April), and the calculator now does all of the major things that I had hoped for it to do. So I think I'll be taking a break for a bit, aside from maybe some small stuff here and there.
Thanks for doing all this. We are a family of three - Father and Mother, both at full retirement age (FRA) and with their own earnings records, and 1 Disabled Adult Child (DAC). Mother's spousal benefit is higher if calculated using the Combined Family Maximum. We have been using the Maximize My Social Security model and just applied for benefits effective October 2018, so I am very familiar with how all this works. I plugged in our data to your model and got the right answers assuming (Case A) Father applies for retirement benefits at FRA, Mother simultaneously applies for spousal benefits, and DAC simultaneously applies for benefits on both earner's records.

As a test, I then tried a Case B, entering the fact that the Mother has been receiving her own disability benefits prior to her own FRA (prior to applying for spousal benefits). In that case your model seems to say that her spousal benefit should be lower than in Case A above. Not sure why a past history of collecting SSDI should reduce present spousal retirement benefit. Seems like a possible bug or I'm not using the model correctly. You could send me a PM if you want to pursue this further.

Incidentally, Social Security took over two months to calculate Mother's spousal benefit incorrectly (used family maximum rather than combined family maximum) and we have submitted an appeal for reconsideration.

User avatar
Topic Author
ObliviousInvestor
Posts: 3477
Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 9:32 am
Contact:

Re: "Open Social Security" calculator: feature requests, bug reports, etc

Post by ObliviousInvestor » Mon Jan 14, 2019 2:02 pm

MtnBiker wrote:
Mon Jan 14, 2019 1:40 pm
ObliviousInvestor wrote:
Thu Jan 10, 2019 9:55 am
Update: I just rolled out functionality for child benefits and child-in-care spousal benefits.

That's about 9 months of nearly full-time work on this project (~30 hours spent on it per week since April), and the calculator now does all of the major things that I had hoped for it to do. So I think I'll be taking a break for a bit, aside from maybe some small stuff here and there.
Thanks for doing all this. We are a family of three - Father and Mother, both at full retirement age (FRA) and with their own earnings records, and 1 Disabled Adult Child (DAC). Mother's spousal benefit is higher if calculated using the Combined Family Maximum. We have been using the Maximize My Social Security model and just applied for benefits effective October 2018, so I am very familiar with how all this works. I plugged in our data to your model and got the right answers assuming (Case A) Father applies for retirement benefits at FRA, Mother simultaneously applies for spousal benefits, and DAC simultaneously applies for benefits on both earner's records.

As a test, I then tried a Case B, entering the fact that the Mother has been receiving her own disability benefits prior to her own FRA (prior to applying for spousal benefits). In that case your model seems to say that her spousal benefit should be lower than in Case A above. Not sure why a past history of collecting SSDI should reduce present spousal retirement benefit. Seems like a possible bug or I'm not using the model correctly. You could send me a PM if you want to pursue this further.
In Case A (Mother not on disability), what did you enter as Mother's PIA and retirement filing date?

As a general rule, spousal benefits should be reduced by the greater of a person's own PIA or retirement benefit. So if she is receiving a retirement benefit in Case B -- due to having converted from a disability benefit -- but not in Case A, her spousal benefit should be smaller in Case B.
Mike Piper, author/blogger

MtnBiker
Posts: 161
Joined: Sun Nov 16, 2014 4:43 pm

Re: "Open Social Security" calculator: feature requests, bug reports, etc

Post by MtnBiker » Mon Jan 14, 2019 3:02 pm

ObliviousInvestor wrote:
Mon Jan 14, 2019 2:02 pm

In Case A (Mother not on disability), what did you enter as Mother's PIA and retirement filing date?

As a general rule, spousal benefits should be reduced by the greater of a person's own PIA or retirement benefit. So if she is receiving a retirement benefit in Case B -- due to having converted from a disability benefit -- but not in Case A, her spousal benefit should be smaller in Case B.
Case A
Fathers PIA $2454
Mother's PIA $307
Father's retirement filing date 10/2018 (at FRA)
Mother's retirement filing date 2/2018 (date she reached FRA, before me)

Calculated:
Your Annual Retirement Benefit $29,448
Spouses Annual Retirement Benefit $3,684
Spouses Annual Spousal Benefit $10,129
Total Child Annual Benefit $14,724

Case B
Fathers PIA $2454
Mother's PIA $307
Father's retirement filing date 10/2018 (at FRA)
Mother's SSDI automatically converts to her retirement benefit 2/2018 (date she reached FRA, before me)

Calculated:
Your Annual Retirement Benefit $29,448
Spouses Annual Retirement Benefit $3,684
Spouses Annual Spousal Benefit $9,208
Total Child Annual Benefit $14,724

User avatar
Topic Author
ObliviousInvestor
Posts: 3477
Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 9:32 am
Contact:

Re: "Open Social Security" calculator: feature requests, bug reports, etc

Post by ObliviousInvestor » Mon Jan 14, 2019 4:14 pm

Thank you for the additional details, MtnBiker.

The issue was that the calculator was using the disability family max rules to calculate the family max on Mother's work record.

In other words it was incorrectly using a $307 family max instead of the correct $460 family max, which led to a smaller combined family max, which ultimately led to a smaller spousal benefit for her.

It has been fixed now, and you should now see the same $10,129 annual figure in Case B as well.
Mike Piper, author/blogger

MtnBiker
Posts: 161
Joined: Sun Nov 16, 2014 4:43 pm

Re: "Open Social Security" calculator: feature requests, bug reports, etc

Post by MtnBiker » Mon Jan 14, 2019 4:37 pm

ObliviousInvestor wrote:
Mon Jan 14, 2019 4:14 pm
Thank you for the additional details, MtnBiker.

The issue was that the calculator was using the disability family max rules to calculate the family max on Mother's work record.

In other words it was incorrectly using a $307 family max instead of the correct $460 family max, which led to a smaller combined family max, which ultimately led to a smaller spousal benefit for her.

It has been fixed now, and you should now see the same $10,129 annual figure in Case B as well.
Perfect. Thanks!

Bloodsuckingleeches
Posts: 6
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 1:12 pm

SS/Open SS calc question

Post by Bloodsuckingleeches » Tue Jan 15, 2019 6:09 pm

[Thread merged into here, see below. --admin LadyGeek]

This question revolves around Opensocialsecurity calc and SS calculations in general. Hope this makes sense, here goes:

My wife and I are 48/50 respectively. We have worked contributing SS for 27 and 25 years respectively. Our PIA at 67 is $2800/month rounded.

When I plug in the following to https://opensocialsecurity.com the following:

Using advanced options tab-
DOB 4/15/68 and 4/15/70
PIA 2800/month for both
Still working -yes for both
Stop working - 01/2020 both
Monthly est income per month until retirement is $8000 both
Child - 1 (4/15/2018 inputted). Not disabled
Assume SS benefit reduction. In 2034 of 23% YES

When I plug these numbers in it tells me the best strategy is to request both benefits at age 62. It states we will receive $18,218 annually each for a total of $36,436

1) Since neither of us has worked more than 27/25 years respectively, if we assume stopping work in 2020, is the info inaccurate because it does not take into account all the $0 income years to meet the 35 year total?

2) I believe the SS.gov website assumes my current level of income for SS contributions to get the $2800 per month PIA estimate. If this is correct, how can the Opensocialsecurity calculator be remotely accurate in assuming the PIA, let alone when to start the ss distributions?

3) Am I doing this calculator correctly or am I missing something?

Thanks for any help and I hope the questions make sense.

vtMaps
Posts: 436
Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2008 12:05 pm
Location: central Vermont

Re: SS/Open SS calc question

Post by vtMaps » Tue Jan 15, 2019 7:20 pm

I suspect the reason for starting at 62 is because you assume a benefit reduction in 2034. If your benefits are cut in 2034, you are probably better off getting as much benefit as possible before the cut.

--vtMaps
The optimist proclaims that we live in the best of all possible worlds; and the pessimist fears this is true. --James Branch Cabell

DrGoogle2017
Posts: 1820
Joined: Mon Aug 14, 2017 12:31 pm

Re: SS/Open SS calc question

Post by DrGoogle2017 » Tue Jan 15, 2019 7:23 pm

I think probably because you have a kid under 18 when you take SS. It’s called the Viagra benefits, so just enjoy. :D

User avatar
LadyGeek
Site Admin
Posts: 50356
Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2008 5:34 pm
Location: Philadelphia
Contact:

Re: "Open Social Security" calculator: feature requests, bug reports, etc

Post by LadyGeek » Tue Jan 15, 2019 7:33 pm

I merged Bloodsuckingleeches' thread into the on-going discussion.
Wiki To some, the glass is half full. To others, the glass is half empty. To an engineer, it's twice the size it needs to be.

User avatar
Topic Author
ObliviousInvestor
Posts: 3477
Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 9:32 am
Contact:

Re: SS/Open SS calc question

Post by ObliviousInvestor » Tue Jan 15, 2019 9:15 pm

Bloodsuckingleeches wrote:
Tue Jan 15, 2019 6:09 pm
1) Since neither of us has worked more than 27/25 years respectively, if we assume stopping work in 2020, is the info inaccurate because it does not take into account all the $0 income years to meet the 35 year total?
The calculator takes your PIA as an input, so it is incumbent upon the user to provide an accurate PIA. If you provide a figure that is not your PIA, but rather an estimate of your PIA that was based upon future earnings which you will not have, then yes, the output from the calculator will overstate your benefit amounts.
Bloodsuckingleeches wrote:
Tue Jan 15, 2019 6:09 pm
2) I believe the SS.gov website assumes my current level of income for SS contributions to get the $2800 per month PIA estimate. If this is correct, how can the Opensocialsecurity calculator be remotely accurate in assuming the PIA, let alone when to start the ss distributions?
Same answer as above. The calculator is not assuming or calculating a PIA at all. It is the user who provides the PIA.

As far as why it's recommending early filing, the posters above are correct that assuming a benefit cut, as well as having a minor child both point in the direction of filing earlier.
Mike Piper, author/blogger

Post Reply