Uber vs Ambulance - HUGE cost difference

Questions on how we spend our money and our time - consumer goods and services, home and vehicle, leisure and recreational activities
User avatar
dm200
Posts: 18389
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 2:21 pm
Location: Washington DC area

Uber vs Ambulance - HUGE cost difference

Post by dm200 » Fri Dec 15, 2017 12:09 pm

http://www.wusa9.com/entertainment/buzz ... /499665429

or, perhaps a prompt service Taxi?

it is not just "cost", either, in my view. In our case, for example, if either DW or I had need for transportation (we or both for some reason could not drive) for an "urgent care" situation, we would want to go (or be taken) to the Kaiser 24 x 7 urgent care facility - for BOTH health/medical and financial reasons. I don't think an ambulance would or could take us there. Uber or taxi would not help, either, if there were an issue of having to be carried or lifted (even if a 100% non life threatening situation).

livesoft
Posts: 62716
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 8:00 pm

Re: Uber vs Ambulance - HUGE cost difference

Post by livesoft » Fri Dec 15, 2017 12:20 pm

If I have a heart attack, I want an ambulance from the very nearby firestation to take me to the hospital. The EMT's should stabilize me and already inform the OR at the hospital that I am coming in, so I get to bypass the ER.
Wiki This signature message sponsored by sscritic: Learn to fish.

Chuck
Posts: 2057
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 12:19 pm

Re: Uber vs Ambulance - HUGE cost difference

Post by Chuck » Fri Dec 15, 2017 12:34 pm

Likewise, if I have a broken arm and can't drive, I'd call Uber, not an ambulance.

harrington
Posts: 135
Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2011 9:09 am

Re: Uber vs Ambulance - HUGE cost difference

Post by harrington » Fri Dec 15, 2017 12:43 pm

My Parents are both 90 plus years old and live 5 houses from the hospital. We have had to call the ambulance many times through the years and the cost was $1200-$1600 each time. Luckily they have excellent secondary insurance and they paid nothing out of pocket.

PVW
Posts: 467
Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2014 11:01 am

Re: Uber vs Ambulance - HUGE cost difference

Post by PVW » Fri Dec 15, 2017 1:03 pm

In related news, Bogleheads have reduced the net income of Financial Advisors.

whiteprius
Posts: 168
Joined: Thu Feb 04, 2016 6:48 pm

Re: Uber vs Ambulance - HUGE cost difference

Post by whiteprius » Fri Dec 15, 2017 1:04 pm

This is smart. I recommend everyone read their byzantine medical insurance policy to see exactly how much a trip to the ER costs for anticipated emergencies. You'd be surprised that two ER's right next to each other can result in a hugely different cost depending on your insurer's network. One night I went to the ER for something stupid and I (a) drove myself and (b) went to the ER about 1.2 miles away from the closest one (because that had a discount for my policy). Wound up paying only $250. Had I taken an ambulance to the other ER I would have paid $6,000.

User avatar
dm200
Posts: 18389
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 2:21 pm
Location: Washington DC area

Re: Uber vs Ambulance - HUGE cost difference

Post by dm200 » Fri Dec 15, 2017 1:11 pm

whiteprius wrote:
Fri Dec 15, 2017 1:04 pm
This is smart. I recommend everyone read their byzantine medical insurance policy to see exactly how much a trip to the ER costs for anticipated emergencies. You'd be surprised that two ER's right next to each other can result in a hugely different cost depending on your insurer's network. One night I went to the ER for something stupid and I (a) drove myself and (b) went to the ER about 1.2 miles away from the closest one (because that had a discount for my policy). Wound up paying only $250. Had I taken an ambulance to the other ER I would have paid $6,000.
DW and I now both are on the same Kaiser Medicare plan - and there is not a huge difference between the costs of a Hospital ER and Kaiser urgent care. However, when DW was on an Obamacare kaiser policy before being eligible for Medicare - the hospital ER was MUCH more expensive.

There are both health and financial risks and tradeoffs. Based on multiple experiences, I believe the Kaiser (24x7) ungent care facility is very capable of dealing with almost any medical situation, and at a lower cost. It also has online access to all records and physicians. If needed, specialists are called in - happened to us.

mouses
Posts: 3738
Joined: Sat Oct 24, 2015 12:24 am

Re: Uber vs Ambulance - HUGE cost difference

Post by mouses » Fri Dec 15, 2017 1:15 pm

Urgent care places cannot always deal with serious situations. A local hospital has several urgent care facilities in my state and they specifically say they are not for things like heart attacks, etc. They're basically "doctor's office" places without the supporting facilities or specialists for emergencies. Their advantage is they're open outside of normal business hours, but even then not necessarily 24/7.

User avatar
EngCapt1
Posts: 83
Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2016 12:02 am

Re: Uber vs Ambulance - HUGE cost difference

Post by EngCapt1 » Fri Dec 15, 2017 1:49 pm

"Uber vs Ambulance - HUGE cost difference"

And also a HUGE difference in emergency prehospital care. Is this a comparison because they both offer transport services? Should I call a plumber to my house instead of a cardiologist if I need a cardiac catheterization? They both clean pipes, right? Is there a difference? Training and education maybe?

:D

EDIT: Not meaning to offend any plumbers.

User avatar
nisiprius
Advisory Board
Posts: 36670
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 9:33 am
Location: The terrestrial, globular, planetary hunk of matter, flattened at the poles, is my abode.--O. Henry

Re: Uber vs Ambulance - HUGE cost difference

Post by nisiprius » Fri Dec 15, 2017 1:59 pm

A couple of years ago... I can't prove that the EMTs who started IV fluid and had it running during the ten minutes it took to get me to the ER saved my life. But even if it didn't, it might have contributed to a good outcome. (Like, my arriving at the ER conscious and being able to talk to them...)

On the other hand, there was the time I walked 3/4 of a mile to the ER because I'd cut my finger in the kitchen, my wife had the car and was out of town, and I just... could... not... get the cut to stop bleeding... and the ER was 3/4 mile away and the Urgent Care was three miles away... yeah, it would probably have been smarter to call Uber. If they weren't worried about getting blood on the car upholstery.
Annual income twenty pounds, annual expenditure nineteen nineteen and six, result happiness; Annual income twenty pounds, annual expenditure twenty pounds ought and six, result misery.

User avatar
NCPE
Posts: 35
Joined: Tue Mar 15, 2016 5:10 am
Location: North Carolina

Re: Uber vs Ambulance - HUGE cost difference

Post by NCPE » Fri Dec 15, 2017 2:09 pm

Speaking from 40 years experience as a Firefighter / EMT - "You get what you pay for"

No offense to Uber but if I have a life threatening emergency I want the best possible pre hospital care I can get. For a non life threatening issue Uber is probably fine, but a wrong decision could mean the difference between life and death. The modern day ambulance truly brings the Emergency Room to you and it is indeed costly to equip and staff an ambulance with Paramedics.

As far as the "Doc in a Box" they do an excellent job providing non urgent and follow up care. In our area If you walk in with any potential life threatening symptoms (Chest Pain, Breathing difficulty, signs of stroke, etc) they pick up the phone and call 9-1-1 for an ambulance.

<edit> - As I soon as I hit the submit button one of the adjacent departments was dispatched to a local urgent care for patient with breathing difficulties. :(

User avatar
EngCapt1
Posts: 83
Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2016 12:02 am

Re: Uber vs Ambulance - HUGE cost difference

Post by EngCapt1 » Fri Dec 15, 2017 2:38 pm

NCPE wrote:
Fri Dec 15, 2017 2:09 pm
The modern day ambulance truly brings the Emergency Room to you and it is indeed costly to equip and staff an ambulance with Paramedics.
You mean they're not just "ambulance drivers"? :D

On a serious note: If you've stubbed your toe, or had a headache for 3 weeks and decide at 3 a.m. you need to go to the ER for it, or you need to have your cold symptoms checked, or you've cut your finger- then by all means call an Uber.

If you're having chest pains, abdominal pains, breathing problems, etc-- then don't let costs dictate whether you call an ambulance or not.

An Ambulance is equipped with diagnostic tools/equipment and staffed by well-trained professionals that will provide life-saving interventions when needed-- it's not just a means of transport from one place to another. An Uber is just a means of transport. There can be no comparison between the two as they are totally different.

Regards

nickjoy
Posts: 90
Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2017 9:44 am

Re: Uber vs Ambulance - HUGE cost difference

Post by nickjoy » Fri Dec 15, 2017 2:43 pm

If it makes a difference, I know in the county where I grew up, you only had to pay the city ambulance bills.

The non-city ambulances would still send you a bill, but if you didn't pay it after the 3 bills came in the mail, they just wrote it off.

The city ambulances would go to collections.

Frederick County, MD. Everything within Frederick is considered city, everything else is considered county. So 85% of the county is just county.

I would take an ambulance either way though. Ubers are just random people who don't want a person dying in their back seat or getting blood everywhere. How pissed would you be if you called an uber, and the uber wouldn't let you in his car because you were bleeding profusely, you argue, then he drives away, now you have to wait even longer for an ambulance.

If it's serious enough for an ambulance, everything else stops, including financial worries.

Shallowpockets
Posts: 680
Joined: Fri Nov 20, 2015 10:26 am

Re: Uber vs Ambulance - HUGE cost difference

Post by Shallowpockets » Fri Dec 15, 2017 2:50 pm

ER RN 25 years here.
Ambulances come in all the time with people who could have come by POV, privately owned vehicle. Or an Uber. So I believe it could be an option for some. But, they are not the same, nor for the same thing.
In most cases an ambulance will get you in to a bed in the ER. No waiting. Due to the burden on ERs many will just triage you out to the acting room for a condition that can wait. I have worked at hospitals in downtown areas where people took ambulances to the ER for minor complaints and were then triaged to wait room and just left. They just wanted a ride downtown. Then they went shopping. I know this because it was repeat business. Heck, there are frquent flyers for whom the ambulance pulls up and honks and the patient comes out and gets in. This was back in the old days when I was an EMT.
It is not unusual for an ambulance to get a 911 call from an ER waiting room from someone who just does not want to wait.
Also many many people (and families) think that the ambulance can take them back home after discharge, from the ER or from the hospital. This is not usually the case. You might have to pay up front, or thinking that it was free you may get a bill later.
Most people think their insurance covers ambulance transport. They should check their policy. Maybe not covered. In which case the bill could be substantial.
I think for the above Uber may be a good alternative. However, even Uber costs money and many do not want to pay anything for a ride to or from the hospital.
I think they both have their places for transport to a medical facility. However if going to an ER for something you think is life threatening, it is best for an ambulance to take you. An ambulance is not just a ride, it is care enroute, notification you are arriving and in what condition. Care is quicker. The poster who stated he could just bypass the ER and go to the OR - well, I have never sent that happen. The best that can be said of that sort of scenario would be the use of the cath lab if it is determined you meet certain criteria, and the system is set up to recognize and plan and execute that scenario.
Uber is same as a taxi and there are many people who arrive or depart the hospital by taxis.
The Uber verses an ambulance title of this post is correct in that there is a huge differemce in cost. But it has no context beyond that.

miamivice
Posts: 961
Joined: Tue Jun 11, 2013 11:46 am

Re: Uber vs Ambulance - HUGE cost difference

Post by miamivice » Fri Dec 15, 2017 3:02 pm

Chuck wrote:
Fri Dec 15, 2017 12:34 pm
Likewise, if I have a broken arm and can't drive, I'd call Uber, not an ambulance.
If I was an Uber driver I'd refuse any rider who was injured and wanted me to drive them to the hospital. I wouldn't want the liability of making their injury worse, or the responsibility to try to monitor them to ensure that their condition didn't degrade while I was driving them.

User avatar
Doom&Gloom
Posts: 2247
Joined: Thu May 08, 2014 3:36 pm

Re: Uber vs Ambulance - HUGE cost difference

Post by Doom&Gloom » Fri Dec 15, 2017 3:11 pm

Seems like a strange topic. Of course there is a huge cost difference.

However, if I think I need to go to the ER and can't drive myself there, cost is likely to be the least of my concerns.

User avatar
dm200
Posts: 18389
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 2:21 pm
Location: Washington DC area

Re: Uber vs Ambulance - HUGE cost difference

Post by dm200 » Fri Dec 15, 2017 3:12 pm

mouses wrote:
Fri Dec 15, 2017 1:15 pm
Urgent care places cannot always deal with serious situations. A local hospital has several urgent care facilities in my state and they specifically say they are not for things like heart attacks, etc. They're basically "doctor's office" places without the supporting facilities or specialists for emergencies. Their advantage is they're open outside of normal business hours, but even then not necessarily 24/7.
There are differences in "Urgent Care" facilities.

I know (from several experiences of mine and my wife's) that the Kaiser (24x7) Ungent care and Clinical decision unit have several type of physicians there in person, can call in appropriate specialists, have lab, CT, Xray, MRI, etc. - and can keep you up to 24 hours. Very extensive supporting facilities. So far, every time we have needed to go there - one of us has driven. I certainly, though, can think of some circumstances where one of us driving would not be prudent, but taking Uber or a cab would work out well.

User avatar
White Coat Investor
Posts: 13443
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 9:11 pm
Location: Greatest Snow On Earth

Re: Uber vs Ambulance - HUGE cost difference

Post by White Coat Investor » Fri Dec 15, 2017 3:15 pm

dm200 wrote:
Fri Dec 15, 2017 12:09 pm
http://www.wusa9.com/entertainment/buzz ... /499665429

or, perhaps a prompt service Taxi?

it is not just "cost", either, in my view. In our case, for example, if either DW or I had need for transportation (we or both for some reason could not drive) for an "urgent care" situation, we would want to go (or be taken) to the Kaiser 24 x 7 urgent care facility - for BOTH health/medical and financial reasons. I don't think an ambulance would or could take us there. Uber or taxi would not help, either, if there were an issue of having to be carried or lifted (even if a 100% non life threatening situation).
One thing I've never seen an Uber driver do is load you into the car and pull you out. If you need that service, call an ambulance.

I actually find it problematic when people pull up in front of the ER and expect the ER staff to get their loved one out of the car and into the ER. Look, if you can't get them out of the car and into the ER, then call the medics. They specialize in doing that. I can't figure out why they could get into the car, but can't get out. I haven't quite called the medics yet to get someone out of the car in front of the ED door, but I think about it every time.

But when it is me and two 120 lb nurses, we can't get your 400 lb wife out of the car safely.

But this whole uber ambulance thing...this has real merit. Uber response times are lower than ambulance response times in many parts of America. But an ambulance isn't just a ride...
1) Invest you must 2) Time is your friend 3) Impulse is your enemy | 4) Basic arithmetic works 5) Stick to simplicity 6) Stay the course

User avatar
White Coat Investor
Posts: 13443
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 9:11 pm
Location: Greatest Snow On Earth

Re: Uber vs Ambulance - HUGE cost difference

Post by White Coat Investor » Fri Dec 15, 2017 3:20 pm

livesoft wrote:
Fri Dec 15, 2017 12:20 pm
If I have a heart attack, I want an ambulance from the very nearby firestation to take me to the hospital. The EMT's should stabilize me and already inform the OR at the hospital that I am coming in, so I get to bypass the ER.
Ha ha. What kind of OR are you planning to go to for your heart attack? You think the CT surgeon is waiting in there ready to do your CABG? I thought you worked in health care?

Your point, however, is right. If medics take you to the hospital for a heart attack and you've actually got a STEMI, it will reduce your door to balloon time compared to Uber transport as we'll activate the cath lab with a medic report of STEMI and the cath lab crew will start driving in. But skipping the ER...haven't seen it happen yet.
1) Invest you must 2) Time is your friend 3) Impulse is your enemy | 4) Basic arithmetic works 5) Stick to simplicity 6) Stay the course

Adam11
Posts: 52
Joined: Sat Jun 06, 2015 1:12 pm

Re: Uber vs Ambulance - HUGE cost difference

Post by Adam11 » Fri Dec 15, 2017 3:20 pm

A few months ago I drove a VERY pregnant woman and her husband in an uberX to the ER. I've had way crazier rides in the past and this one was going to be very short and quick, so it never really even crossed my mind to suggest an ambulance instead. She wasn't in full-on labor and was able to walk, but definitely uncomfortable and had a couple of groans/moans on a mile-long ride. Her husband said the due date was in a week so she was close, but the reason they called an uberX was because they had a false-alarm a week prior and it took almost an hour for an ambulance to arrive (in the heart of D.C.). I took them door-to-door for $10 in less than ten minutes. And I got tipped a dollar...I'll always wonder if they named their baby after me, lol.
Image

Chuck
Posts: 2057
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 12:19 pm

Re: Uber vs Ambulance - HUGE cost difference

Post by Chuck » Fri Dec 15, 2017 3:22 pm

miamivice wrote:
Fri Dec 15, 2017 3:02 pm
If I was an Uber driver I'd refuse any rider who was injured and wanted me to drive them to the hospital. I wouldn't want the liability of making their injury worse, or the responsibility to try to monitor them to ensure that their condition didn't degrade while I was driving them.
Luckily, I think most other people's first reaction wouldn't be to refuse to help.

There are a lot of absurd reactions in this thread. Your situation is either life-threatening or it's not. If it is life-threatening, you take an ambulance. I don't think anyone suggested otherwise.

There are many many people who consider ambulances to be hospital taxis. This is a good example of what happens to activities that are subsidized. It's better for everyone if ambulances are available for real emergencies.

letsgobobby
Posts: 11590
Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2009 1:10 am

Re: Uber vs Ambulance - HUGE cost difference

Post by letsgobobby » Fri Dec 15, 2017 3:26 pm

I have begun seeing patients at the hospital who present for SI (suicidal ideation) and arrive by Uber.

9liner
Posts: 87
Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2017 1:03 pm

Re: Uber vs Ambulance - HUGE cost difference

Post by 9liner » Fri Dec 15, 2017 3:33 pm

As a career firefighter and paramedic for almost 18 years now, I can honestly say there has been a sea change over the last decade. The wholesale abuse of emergency services (ambulances and emergency room visits) is rampant. The stress it puts on many systems leads to increased response times, overburdened ERs, and significant provider burnout. 911 has been the de-facto go-to for even the most minor of problems. The strain on the systems often leads to unavailability of resources to those who truly need it. I can anecdotally say that 75% of the patients I transport to the hospital would have been just as well served going in a private vehicle to an urgent care center. Most large-scale EMS systems are on the verge of collapse and are scrambling to cope with this increased demand. EMS has turned into a glorified taxi service.

The system I work for has begun investing large sums of time and money in pilot programs such as nurse triage lines for low acuity callers in order to re-direct them away from the 911 system. While some progress is being made, the question remains as to how long the system can cope at this rate.

Bottom line: Life, limb, or eyesight: Call an ambulance. For maladies that do not rise to that threshold, your personal physician or urgent care center will suffice.

ResearchMed
Posts: 7228
Joined: Fri Dec 26, 2008 11:25 pm

CNBC article on Uber -->> fewer ambulance rides /Re: Uber vs Ambulance - HUGE cost difference

Post by ResearchMed » Fri Dec 15, 2017 3:50 pm

Timely... an article about how ambulance service drops when Uber is available:

https://www.cnbc.com/2017/12/15/when-ub ... rides.html

We had to call an ambulance twice in the past 2 years, and there isn't a chance we'd have done anything other than call 911.
In both cases, immediate care was started in the ambulance.
It was pretty impressive. Those people knew what they were doing.
They also had a lot of information ready for the ER staff upon arrival, making everything faster.

We owe them a lot, as we do many others who serve in a variety of ways.

RM
This signature is a placebo. You are in the control group.

User avatar
dm200
Posts: 18389
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 2:21 pm
Location: Washington DC area

Re: Uber vs Ambulance - HUGE cost difference

Post by dm200 » Fri Dec 15, 2017 4:47 pm

9liner wrote:
Fri Dec 15, 2017 3:33 pm
As a career firefighter and paramedic for almost 18 years now, I can honestly say there has been a sea change over the last decade. The wholesale abuse of emergency services (ambulances and emergency room visits) is rampant. The stress it puts on many systems leads to increased response times, overburdened ERs, and significant provider burnout. 911 has been the de-facto go-to for even the most minor of problems. The strain on the systems often leads to unavailability of resources to those who truly need it. I can anecdotally say that 75% of the patients I transport to the hospital would have been just as well served going in a private vehicle to an urgent care center. Most large-scale EMS systems are on the verge of collapse and are scrambling to cope with this increased demand. EMS has turned into a glorified taxi service.
The system I work for has begun investing large sums of time and money in pilot programs such as nurse triage lines for low acuity callers in order to re-direct them away from the 911 system. While some progress is being made, the question remains as to how long the system can cope at this rate.
Bottom line: Life, limb, or eyesight: Call an ambulance. For maladies that do not rise to that threshold, your personal physician or urgent care center will suffice.
Exactly ...

BUT - I am not sure I agree 100% with your conclusions.

1. Prior to our returning to Kaiser, which has extensive after hours care, urgent and (to a considerable degree) emergency services in this area, our Physicians provided no after hours services at all. A hospital ER was the recommendation.

2. When someone at various kinds of organizations, places of worship, employment, etc. has almost any kind of medical need - however trivial - those organizations seem to insist on calling 911 - and invoking all of the steps you decry.

3. A few years ago, before returning to Kaiser - I noticed a number of these urgent care centers popping up. I called our helth insurance provider to ask about which ones would be covered under our plan, since I did not see any of them in the provider book. The insurance person who staffed the hotline, would not answer the question - fully. He acted like this was a "secret". He said that if I gave him the details (name of place, name of Physician, etc. - then he could tell me if it would be covered. Obviously, since I was not "there" with a need - I could not give him the information. In addition, if I went there in the evening or weekend, the insurance place would not have the hotline staffed. I tried to be a wise consumer -- but was stifled by the insurance company.

I regard going to a Hospital ER as a tortuous experience for anything other than life or death situations. Why anyone would go there when other choices are available is completely beyond my comprehension.

livesoft
Posts: 62716
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 8:00 pm

Re: Uber vs Ambulance - HUGE cost difference

Post by livesoft » Fri Dec 15, 2017 4:48 pm

White Coat Investor wrote:
Fri Dec 15, 2017 3:20 pm
Ha ha. What kind of OR are you planning to go to for your heart attack? You think the CT surgeon is waiting in there ready to do your CABG? I thought you worked in health care?

Your point, however, is right. If medics take you to the hospital for a heart attack and you've actually got a STEMI, it will reduce your door to balloon time compared to Uber transport as we'll activate the cath lab with a medic report of STEMI and the cath lab crew will start driving in. But skipping the ER...haven't seen it happen yet.
Happened to a friend of mine. Right into cath lab. Lots of good hospitals and physicians around me. Of course, his incident was at a convenient time during a weekday. :)
Wiki This signature message sponsored by sscritic: Learn to fish.

jebmke
Posts: 8370
Joined: Thu Apr 05, 2007 2:44 pm

Re: Uber vs Ambulance - HUGE cost difference

Post by jebmke » Fri Dec 15, 2017 4:52 pm

No uber in rural areas; no medical care either so I'm still dependent on duct tape for trauma and jumper cables for cardiac care to get me to civilization. Our local hospital can't handle either so I'll likely have to drive myself.
When you discover that you are riding a dead horse, the best strategy is to dismount.

User avatar
Sandtrap
Posts: 5328
Joined: Sat Nov 26, 2016 6:32 pm
Location: Hawaii😀 Northern AZ.😳 Retired.

Re: Uber vs Ambulance - HUGE cost difference

Post by Sandtrap » Fri Dec 15, 2017 5:34 pm

Drive in to the ER and wait.
911 Ambulance gets you farther up the waiting line and into the ER and onto a bed.
There is no cost to be considered when a fatality is on the line. Of course you may grumble about the bills later as they come in, but when you're on the floor and seeing the tunnel and the bright warm light. . . 911 brings the entire medical system to bear. . . . And, it's worth every single dime.
j :D

Jack FFR1846
Posts: 7799
Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2013 7:05 am

Re: Uber vs Ambulance - HUGE cost difference

Post by Jack FFR1846 » Fri Dec 15, 2017 5:53 pm

Son had some kind of reaction while at college. Campus police called ambulance. While en route, his throat started closing and they used an epi pen. Throat cleared up. I'm fine paying the bill because an Uber would have likely resulted in dead son.
Bogle: Smart Beta is stupid

User avatar
bostondan
Posts: 513
Joined: Sun Aug 18, 2013 12:21 pm
Location: Boston, MA

Re: Uber vs Ambulance - HUGE cost difference

Post by bostondan » Fri Dec 15, 2017 5:57 pm

livesoft wrote:
Fri Dec 15, 2017 4:48 pm
White Coat Investor wrote:
Fri Dec 15, 2017 3:20 pm
Ha ha. What kind of OR are you planning to go to for your heart attack? You think the CT surgeon is waiting in there ready to do your CABG? I thought you worked in health care?

Your point, however, is right. If medics take you to the hospital for a heart attack and you've actually got a STEMI, it will reduce your door to balloon time compared to Uber transport as we'll activate the cath lab with a medic report of STEMI and the cath lab crew will start driving in. But skipping the ER...haven't seen it happen yet.
Happened to a friend of mine. Right into cath lab. Lots of good hospitals and physicians around me. Of course, his incident was at a convenient time during a weekday. :)
I am a cardiology fellow at a major academic medical center. When it is a clear STEMI, patients go right to the cath lab and skip the OR. We do this to reduce door-to-balloon time, as you mentioned.

Ed is right though, most patients do go through the ER no matter what. The STEMI situation is unique.
“There may be times when we are powerless to prevent injustice, but there must never be a time when we fail to protest.” - Elie Wiesel

jmw
Posts: 41
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2015 2:01 pm

Re: Uber vs Ambulance - HUGE cost difference

Post by jmw » Fri Dec 15, 2017 6:48 pm

This is a really odd topic. So let's limit this to the emergency conditions where you can't drive yourself to the ER due to danger of passing out or something similar and a family member/friend can't drive you there immediately. Uber is just a substitute for driving yourself to the ER. Also very important: the Uber or taxi driver is not going to help you get in or out of the vehicle because you're feeling weak. If you can't drive yourself there and walk in, Uber is not an option. ER personnel are not going to be ready to help you if you pass out at the front door. Your head will just make contact with the hard floor when you pass out.

I think this is a thinly veiled query about avoiding the high cost of an ambulance copay under many Medicare Advantage plans and other HMO plans that can cost around $200 per ambulance ride vs. using Uber. First of all, you could have avoided this cost discussion and rationing of medical care with traditional Medicare with a supplement. But since you made the "disadvantage" choice and don't have a driver handy to take you to the ER immediately, just eat the ambulance copay, pay the bill, and move on while others pay nothing for their ambulance ride since they chose the more expensive and higher benefit plans. This thread could have came up in many other different forms due to the many ways Medicare HMO plans jack up the copay like $200 copay MRIs, CTscans, days in a SNF, etc.

9liner
Posts: 87
Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2017 1:03 pm

Re: Uber vs Ambulance - HUGE cost difference

Post by 9liner » Fri Dec 15, 2017 7:27 pm

Sandtrap wrote:
Fri Dec 15, 2017 5:34 pm
Drive in to the ER and wait.
911 Ambulance gets you farther up the waiting line and into the ER and onto a bed.
There is no cost to be considered when a fatality is on the line. Of course you may grumble about the bills later as they come in, but when you're on the floor and seeing the tunnel and the bright warm light. . . 911 brings the entire medical system to bear. . . . And, it's worth every single dime.
j :D
Not true. EVERYONE regardless of the mode of arrival gets triaged. I bring plenty of patients straight from my stretcher to the waiting room. If you show up in a privately owned vehicle suffering from a serious condition you will be triaged as such.

9liner
Posts: 87
Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2017 1:03 pm

Re: Uber vs Ambulance - HUGE cost difference

Post by 9liner » Fri Dec 15, 2017 7:29 pm

Jack FFR1846 wrote:
Fri Dec 15, 2017 5:53 pm
Son had some kind of reaction while at college. Campus police called ambulance. While en route, his throat started closing and they used an epi pen. Throat cleared up. I'm fine paying the bill because an Uber would have likely resulted in dead son.

I don’t think ANYBODY has advocated Uber for a serious condition such as an allergic reaction.

Thesaints
Posts: 1619
Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2017 12:25 am

Re: Uber vs Ambulance - HUGE cost difference

Post by Thesaints » Fri Dec 15, 2017 7:41 pm

A bus, or the underground, are even cheaper...

junior
Posts: 758
Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2008 6:14 pm
Contact:

Re: Uber vs Ambulance - HUGE cost difference

Post by junior » Fri Dec 15, 2017 7:51 pm

miamivice wrote:
Fri Dec 15, 2017 3:02 pm
Chuck wrote:
Fri Dec 15, 2017 12:34 pm
Likewise, if I have a broken arm and can't drive, I'd call Uber, not an ambulance.
If I was an Uber driver I'd refuse any rider who was injured and wanted me to drive them to the hospital. I wouldn't want the liability of making their injury worse, or the responsibility to try to monitor them to ensure that their condition didn't degrade while I was driving them.
I don't know how this would play out legally, but the idea that leaving the injured person who had been waiting for your car to fend for themselves gives you less liability is an odd conclusion.

edit: Seems like they could sue you for breach of contract, for example.
Last edited by junior on Fri Dec 15, 2017 7:56 pm, edited 2 times in total.

livesoft
Posts: 62716
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 8:00 pm

Re: Uber vs Ambulance - HUGE cost difference

Post by livesoft » Fri Dec 15, 2017 7:53 pm

Check out what Good Samaritan laws are in your state.
Wiki This signature message sponsored by sscritic: Learn to fish.

User avatar
dm200
Posts: 18389
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 2:21 pm
Location: Washington DC area

Re: Uber vs Ambulance - HUGE cost difference

Post by dm200 » Fri Dec 15, 2017 8:37 pm

jmw wrote:
Fri Dec 15, 2017 6:48 pm
This is a really odd topic. So let's limit this to the emergency conditions where you can't drive yourself to the ER due to danger of passing out or something similar and a family member/friend can't drive you there immediately. Uber is just a substitute for driving yourself to the ER. Also very important: the Uber or taxi driver is not going to help you get in or out of the vehicle because you're feeling weak. If you can't drive yourself there and walk in, Uber is not an option. ER personnel are not going to be ready to help you if you pass out at the front door. Your head will just make contact with the hard floor when you pass out.

I think this is a thinly veiled query about avoiding the high cost of an ambulance copay under many Medicare Advantage plans and other HMO plans that can cost around $200 per ambulance ride vs. using Uber.
First of all, you could have avoided this cost discussion and rationing of medical care with traditional Medicare with a supplement. But since you made the "disadvantage" choice and don't have a driver handy to take you to the ER immediately, just eat the ambulance copay, pay the bill, and move on while others pay nothing for their ambulance ride since they chose the more expensive and higher benefit plans. This thread could have came up in many other different forms due to the many ways Medicare HMO plans jack up the copay like $200 copay MRIs, CTscans, days in a SNF, etc.
No, it is more than that. In my jurisdiction, and probably most jurisdictions, when you call 911 and an ambulance is sent - I believe the ambulance will only tansport you to the nearest (or assigned) Hospital ER. In a great many cases, that is not meedically necessary or even wise. It is often best to go to (or be taken to) some kind of Urgent care facility. In our cases, I believe that in, perhaps, 95% or so of such medical needs - we would best go to, or be taken to, our Kaiser Urgent care facility.

User avatar
Sandtrap
Posts: 5328
Joined: Sat Nov 26, 2016 6:32 pm
Location: Hawaii😀 Northern AZ.😳 Retired.

Re: Uber vs Ambulance - HUGE cost difference

Post by Sandtrap » Fri Dec 15, 2017 9:28 pm

9liner wrote:
Fri Dec 15, 2017 7:27 pm
Sandtrap wrote:
Fri Dec 15, 2017 5:34 pm
Drive in to the ER and wait.
911 Ambulance gets you farther up the waiting line and into the ER and onto a bed.
There is no cost to be considered when a fatality is on the line. Of course you may grumble about the bills later as they come in, but when you're on the floor and seeing the tunnel and the bright warm light. . . 911 brings the entire medical system to bear. . . . And, it's worth every single dime.
j :D
Not true. EVERYONE regardless of the mode of arrival gets triaged. I bring plenty of patients straight from my stretcher to the waiting room. If you show up in a privately owned vehicle suffering from a serious condition you will be triaged as such.
You are Absolutely Correct and very wise.
I may have been vague in my description. Unfortunately, I've been in both situations far too often and am thankful to have devoted medical professionals like yourself give me their fullest attention. If not, I would not be typing this right now.
Mahalo,
j

motorcyclesarecool
Posts: 520
Joined: Sun Dec 14, 2014 7:39 am

Re: Uber vs Ambulance - HUGE cost difference

Post by motorcyclesarecool » Fri Dec 15, 2017 9:41 pm

1. Our local §501(c)(3) nonprofit ambulance service has an annual “subscription”. For $50 per year per household, they’ll waive any bill beyond what your insurance pays them. They do a mail campaign each December.

2. I have a kid with severe allergies. I’ve driven her in each time she's needed a trip to the ED. I’d just rather not wait for the ambulance to arrive. When they see a little kid completely covered in hives (the last time she even started to wheeze) in triage, they get you in fairly quickly.

3. DW had a miscarriage while we were on vacation. Nothing they could do = long wait first at urgent care then ED. Frustrating but perfectly understandable.

4. I could totally see using Uber to get myself to hospital if I were ambulatory.

All in all, I feel like the ED system tends to work. Also I’m glad the ambulance is there.
Understand that choosing an HDHP is very much a "red pill" approach. Most would rather pay higher premiums for a $20 copay per visit. They will think you weird for choosing an HSA.

User avatar
White Coat Investor
Posts: 13443
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 9:11 pm
Location: Greatest Snow On Earth

Re: Uber vs Ambulance - HUGE cost difference

Post by White Coat Investor » Fri Dec 15, 2017 11:25 pm

bostondan wrote:
Fri Dec 15, 2017 5:57 pm
livesoft wrote:
Fri Dec 15, 2017 4:48 pm
White Coat Investor wrote:
Fri Dec 15, 2017 3:20 pm
Ha ha. What kind of OR are you planning to go to for your heart attack? You think the CT surgeon is waiting in there ready to do your CABG? I thought you worked in health care?

Your point, however, is right. If medics take you to the hospital for a heart attack and you've actually got a STEMI, it will reduce your door to balloon time compared to Uber transport as we'll activate the cath lab with a medic report of STEMI and the cath lab crew will start driving in. But skipping the ER...haven't seen it happen yet.
Happened to a friend of mine. Right into cath lab. Lots of good hospitals and physicians around me. Of course, his incident was at a convenient time during a weekday. :)
I am a cardiology fellow at a major academic medical center. When it is a clear STEMI, patients go right to the cath lab and skip the OR. We do this to reduce door-to-balloon time, as you mentioned.

Ed is right though, most patients do go through the ER no matter what. The STEMI situation is unique.
If patients went straight to the cath lab they'd be in there all alone at my hospital 90% of the time. Our cath teams certainly don't sleep in there. But somewhere big enough to have in-house fellows, sure, why not?

And I assume you mean ER, not OR.
1) Invest you must 2) Time is your friend 3) Impulse is your enemy | 4) Basic arithmetic works 5) Stick to simplicity 6) Stay the course

ccieemeritus
Posts: 562
Joined: Thu Mar 06, 2014 10:43 pm

Re: Uber vs Ambulance - HUGE cost difference

Post by ccieemeritus » Fri Dec 15, 2017 11:47 pm

I dislocated my shoulder a few years ago. The circulation in my arm was not impaired. A friend was nearby and drove me to the hospital. Had he not been available, lyft would have been a less expensive choice than an ambulance. Driving myself with that injury was not recommended.

If my circulation was impaired, I'd call 911.

+1 to the comment that bringing yourself to the ER results in a wait in the waiting room. You'll get faster medical care arriving in an ambulance, but you'll pay for it.

lyft would also have been useful for my Mom. She had difficulty driving herself at night and on highways. But I was never able to get her to use a smartphone. She did use taxi (from her flip phone) but its more expensive and more trouble to call (although some taxi companies now have smartphone apps).

User avatar
Watty
Posts: 14128
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 3:55 pm

Re: Uber vs Ambulance - HUGE cost difference

Post by Watty » Sat Dec 16, 2017 12:13 am

The Uber part of this question is a bit of a red herring except that they might rightfully refuse to take you and call 911.

You could just as well ask when you should have a friend or family member take you to the ER or urgent care center.

Here is a general PDF on that.

http://www.in.gov/dhs/files/When_to_cal ... eet(1).pdf

I have no specific medical background but I have seen the "FAST" acronym a number of times to help people remember how it identify a possible stroke which will apparently respond to some treatments only within the first three hours. If you wait four hours to see if the symptoms go away then then could be a huge mistake.

Face: Smile and see if one side of the face droops.

Arms: Raise both arms. Does one arm drop down?

Speech: Say a short phrase and check for slurred or strange speech.

Time: If the answer to any of these is yes, call 911 right away and write down the time when symptoms started.

https://www.webmd.com/stroke/guide/signs-of-stroke

2comma
Posts: 1241
Joined: Thu Jul 15, 2010 11:37 pm

Re: Uber vs Ambulance - HUGE cost difference

Post by 2comma » Sat Dec 16, 2017 1:22 am

On my favorite science and critical thinking podcast they have a science of fiction quiz for the panel every week. Two of the statements are science (true) and one is fake. One questions was is it always better to take and ambulance if have an emergency. Turns out in the study he was quoting, for puncture type wounds (severe stabbings and gunshot wounds) the mortality rate was actually higher if you called an ambulance. Apparently time was so critical having someone throw you into a car and get you to the ER overcame the ability of the EMTs to prevent you from bleeding out. Something to think about after you next knife or gun fight goes badly. The host of the show is a practicing academic neurologist and I'm sure the study accounted for things like the higher number of incidents in areas where ambulance service might also be slower.

Small rural hospitals in my area have a reputation for not being where you want to go if it's an emergency. I had a friend who's father, who was obviously having a heart attack, chose to have his cousin try to rush him to a hospital an hour away in the big city. That decision may have cost him his life.

My wife had a sever asthma attack and I called the health insurance company's 24 hour nurse to ask what to do - ok, I'm not the smartest... She said call 911 and get her to ER now and an ambulance will get her admitted quicker. Well the hospital is 5 minutes away, ambulance takes about 8 minutest to get here so I knew I could get here to ER before they could even arrive. They saw her immediately. I asked my friend the EMT, works as volunteer for a city FD, if the ambulance ride gives you any priority at ER and he said no, they all do triage and it's worst in first in.
If I am stupid I will pay.

madbrain
Posts: 5081
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2011 5:06 pm
Location: San Jose, California

Re: Uber vs Ambulance - HUGE cost difference

Post by madbrain » Sat Dec 16, 2017 4:42 am

Had to go to the ER a month ago . My husband was out of the country. I was supposed to fly soon after. There was no one to drive me. I did not have uber setup. I was short of breath. Called 911 and got an ambulance. Was driven by EMT to the nearest Kaiser in-network hospital, which happens 15 miles away. Had zero wait. The ER did not keep me long, gave me some quick breathing treatment, cleared me to go home and travel, and basically kicked me out. I got an ambulance bill in the mail upon my return from Asia for ... $2,758.45 . Covered 100% by my insurer. And yes, this is only for transportation, not for the ER stay. I haven't gotten the EOB for that yet. I paid my $35 flat ER copay and may never see that EOB.

During my Asia trip, I suffered from food poisoning in Bangkok. After ruining an Uber driver's car due to vomiting, I had to be hospitalized for 2 nights with explosive diarrhea. One of the best hospitals I have ever seen. My husband was joking we should book that instead of the 5-star Conrad we were staying in (in which I spent only 3 nights instead of 5 due to hospital stay...). It is the 3rd time I get food poisoning in asia and the second time it brought me to the hospital. The bill for the 2 nights came to 60,913 Thai bhat, or $1873 as of today. Less than the ambulance ride in the US ! The nurses were very nice even though they had to change my adult diapers a number of times (finished one box). If you have to be get sick somewhere, Thailand is it. Much better service than at the Hanoi French hospital in Vietnam, for the same price per night. Still 5 times the price of the Conrad/night. But hey, I earned reward points on my Sapphire Reserve for those hospital bills. Now I just need to get Kaiser to reimburse, and that will take a few months to get paid back. Not my first time submitting foreign medical bills to them ! This time I also have another doctor bill for $265 in Ho Chi Minh as well the week before.

palaheel
Posts: 96
Joined: Wed Mar 22, 2017 7:35 am

Re: Uber vs Ambulance - HUGE cost difference

Post by palaheel » Sat Dec 16, 2017 5:58 am

In our area, an ambulance will get you into a bed in the ER immediately. If Urgent Care is closed, our discussion is "do we want to call for an ambulance, or sit in the waiting room for 3 hours?"
Markets crash. Markets recover. Inflation takes your money FOREVER.

westie
Posts: 444
Joined: Thu Jan 19, 2012 8:00 am

Re: Uber vs Ambulance - HUGE cost difference

Post by westie » Sat Dec 16, 2017 7:59 am

My local town fire department has a program whereby if you pay $75 a year they will cover the cost of ambulance services that your insurance won't pay.

annielouise
Posts: 331
Joined: Wed May 14, 2008 4:11 pm

Re: Uber vs Ambulance - HUGE cost difference

Post by annielouise » Sat Dec 16, 2017 8:41 am

If I were having a heart attack, I would accept that dying is part of life, stay with my family, and save them the cost of both the ambulance and outrageous hospital expenses. Everybody dies.

whomever
Posts: 782
Joined: Sat Apr 21, 2012 5:21 pm

Re: Uber vs Ambulance - HUGE cost difference

Post by whomever » Sat Dec 16, 2017 9:12 am

when you call 911 and an ambulance is sent - I believe the ambulance will only tansport you to the nearest (or assigned) Hospital ER.
From reading this thread, I think there must be a lot of local variations. We had an elderly neighbor who took a number of ambulance rides (legit ones, e.g. for one we called her oncologist and gave him her vitals and the oncologist said 'call 911'). The EMTs always asked which hospital she preferred. FWIW, this was an urban area with several hospitals withing a few miles.

Given that insurance varies so much, some reasonable accommodation of the patient's preference seems reasonable, assuming all the options are equipped to treat whatever malady the patient has. My sense was that only a couple of those hospitals were set up for e.g. severe trauma, so you might be offered fewer reasonable options for that..

User avatar
nisiprius
Advisory Board
Posts: 36670
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 9:33 am
Location: The terrestrial, globular, planetary hunk of matter, flattened at the poles, is my abode.--O. Henry

Re: Uber vs Ambulance - HUGE cost difference

Post by nisiprius » Sat Dec 16, 2017 11:05 am

miamivice wrote:
Fri Dec 15, 2017 3:02 pm
Chuck wrote:
Fri Dec 15, 2017 12:34 pm
Likewise, if I have a broken arm and can't drive, I'd call Uber, not an ambulance.
If I was an Uber driver I'd refuse any rider who was injured and wanted me to drive them to the hospital. I wouldn't want the liability of making their injury worse, or the responsibility to try to monitor them to ensure that their condition didn't degrade while I was driving them.
Or even the possibility of the vehicle needing to be cleaned afterwards.
Annual income twenty pounds, annual expenditure nineteen nineteen and six, result happiness; Annual income twenty pounds, annual expenditure twenty pounds ought and six, result misery.

User avatar
dm200
Posts: 18389
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 2:21 pm
Location: Washington DC area

Re: Uber vs Ambulance - HUGE cost difference

Post by dm200 » Sat Dec 16, 2017 11:33 am

annielouise wrote:
Sat Dec 16, 2017 8:41 am
If I were having a heart attack, I would accept that dying is part of life, stay with my family, and save them the cost of both the ambulance and outrageous hospital expenses. Everybody dies.
Versus the real possibility/probability that your life cound be saved and live a normal lifespan? One thing if you are elderly and have other health issues - yet another if you are, say, 35 and in otherwise good health...

Post Reply