There's very little hard data on the details of what college admissions officer prefer and don't, particularly when you get to the details of things like job vs. extra-curricular. FWIW, what I've seen on College Confidential, which should be taken with a LARGE dose of salt, IMO, is that jobs are fine, and ~on par with ECs, even for kids who don't obviously need the money. (Of course, the specifics in question would matter.)avalpert1 wrote: ↑Mon Sep 30, 2024 1:38 pm LOL - come on, if you aren't even going to put in the effort why bother at all. A trite medium post that looks AI generated by someone with 1 follower that offers no evidence or support, just condescending conjecture about the working class sensibilities of admissions officers...
We discouraged our kids from having jobs, during the school year, in HS. But they DID consistently have jobs during summers (except COVID summer of 2020.) I think this is the way to go.
As for the OP's Q - some of the teen's spending seems a little frivolous and trimmable. And "forced savings" (I pay you $150, you put $75 into savings) is a little odd. I don't remember exactly the amount my wife gave our kids as allowance - probably on the order of ~$50/mo. Supplement that with birthday and Christmas money from grandparents, and summer job money, and they did fine. While it's not a bad idea to teach savings habits, the actual amount a 16 year old can meaningfully save is fairly trivial, versus that kid's longer-term income potential (for an apparently smart & ambitious kid like OP's).