International Large Value

Have a question about your personal investments? No matter how simple or complex, you can ask it here.
Post Reply
Topic Author
InvestingMom
Posts: 503
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2007 2:45 pm

International Large Value

Post by InvestingMom »

Hi all,

I am rebalancing my portfolio and would like to simplify it at the same time. Last year with so much TLHing I ended up with a couple of International Large Value funds in my taxable account (401K is maxed with bonds). For the most part both of the funds have small gains/losses and in any case with the losses I accumulated from last year any gains would easily be offset with my carryover.

So....my question is, all things being equal which fund/ETF would you choose:

Vanguard International Value Fund (VTRIX)
Dodge and Cox International* (DODFX)
I-Shares MSCI EAFE Value Index (EFV)

*I realize that this fund is not classified as value anymore, but when I did a morningstar Xray it still leans towards value.

I would really like to go with an index fund....but I own the DODFX and VTRIX and for some reason I just can't seem to pull the trigger. They both look like they perform better than the ETF (over 3 years). I know that past performance blah blah blah. But I would feel stupid to move to the ETF just to simplify and have it under perform these 2 funds. Any insight would be greatly appreciated.

Investingmom
Wagnerjb
Posts: 7203
Joined: Mon Feb 19, 2007 8:44 pm
Location: Houston, Texas

Post by Wagnerjb »

I prefer the lower costs and lack of manager risk that you get in passive funds. Thus, I own EFV.

Best wishes.
Andy
User avatar
baw703916
Posts: 6681
Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2007 1:10 pm
Location: Seattle

Post by baw703916 »

Hi Investingmom,

VTRIX does not have a good record for tax efficiency (several sizable capital gains distributions in recent years). It may be better for the next several years, thanks to a large loss carryforward from 2008, but in the long run actively managed funds w/o ETF shares tend to not be tax efficient.

I'm not sure about D&C's tax efficiency, but in a taxable account I would definitely not recommend VTRIX.

EFV doesn't thrill me, particularly, for one thing it ends up having a overly large weighting to financials. But I think it's the best choice (I own it myself).

Best wishes,
Brad
Most of my posts assume no behavioral errors.
Topic Author
InvestingMom
Posts: 503
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2007 2:45 pm

Post by InvestingMom »

Thanks for your input. Good points.

And yes, it seems obvious now that you said it Brad that the ETF would be more tax efficient. Now to get off my butt and do it (need to look at the fall distributions though before I do anything!)

Thanks again,
Investingmom
mikep
Posts: 3730
Joined: Wed Apr 22, 2009 9:27 pm

Post by mikep »

EFV does not contain any emerging market exposure like VTRIX.. if you want EM exposure you may need an additional fund.

As for financials, they are value out of favor stocks... this is what you get.
User avatar
Opponent Process
Posts: 5157
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2007 9:19 pm

Post by Opponent Process »

DODFX also benefits from emerging markets.

tough call, actually they are all really good options. DODFX takes a lot of additional risk to get added returns (although they're pretty good at it). I personally wouldn't worry about regret with EFV, though.
30/30/20/20 | US/International/Bonds/TIPS | Average Age=37
User avatar
dkdoy
Posts: 549
Joined: Sat Jun 13, 2009 11:07 am
Location: Oregon

Post by dkdoy »

I own Dodge and Cox and have overall been very happy with them. Very good management, with low expense ratios. Also the fact that they do not have a marketing dept and make every attempt to keep costs down is something that I like. Other than buying index DODFX is hard to beat. I also like the emerging market exposure. Great management team with a very long tenure with company another plus..
Topic Author
InvestingMom
Posts: 503
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2007 2:45 pm

Post by InvestingMom »

Thanks for the additional input. That is good to know that EFV doesn't contain emerging markets and may explain the difference in the 3 year returns as compared to the other 2 funds. It helps to compare apples to apples!
fishndoc
Posts: 2327
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 11:50 am

Post by fishndoc »

EFV does not contain any emerging market exposure like VTRIX.. if you want EM exposure you may need an additional fund.
For me, this is a positive, as it makes it easier to rebalance and maintain my target EM allocation using EM-only funds.

Wayne
" Successful investing involves doing just a few things right, and avoiding serious mistakes." - J. Bogle
Topic Author
InvestingMom
Posts: 503
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2007 2:45 pm

Post by InvestingMom »

fishndoc wrote:
EFV does not contain any emerging market exposure like VTRIX.. if you want EM exposure you may need an additional fund.
For me, this is a positive, as it makes it easier to rebalance and maintain my target EM allocation using EM-only funds.

Wayne
Good point. I actually own Emerging markets already and so i was thinking maybe I should keep Dodfx after all and get rid of Emerging Markets to help meet my goal of simplifying. But if you are a slice and dicer, (and have taxable accounts where you may need to TLH) consolidating funds might make it less simple.

Anyway, I have pretty much concluded I should switch to EFV because of the tax efficiency and keep my Emerging fund. If the market keeps up though, the gains on the funds I am selling are going to be higher than anticipated! I was lazy and did not rebalance when losses were bigger...oh well...
Post Reply