Vanguard's Wellesley Income fund is incredible

Discuss all general (i.e. non-personal) investing questions and issues, investing news, and theory.
User avatar
abuss368
Posts: 17197
Joined: Mon Aug 03, 2009 2:33 pm
Location: Where the water is warm, the drinks are cold, and I don't know the names of the players!
Contact:

Re: Vanguard's Wellesley Income fund is incredible

Post by abuss368 » Tue Jan 14, 2020 8:17 pm

Blue456 wrote:
Tue Jan 14, 2020 7:24 pm
Triple digit golfer wrote:
Tue Jan 14, 2020 6:48 pm
Blue456 wrote:
Tue Jan 14, 2020 5:26 pm
Triple digit golfer wrote:
Tue Jan 14, 2020 2:17 pm

I see many using it in taxable accounts. Again, Bogleheads philosophy, "Minimize taxes."
What’s more important minimizing taxes or after tax return?
After tax returns.
Wellesley after tax return despite being "tax inefficient" beats Vanguard Life Strategy Moderate Growth and Target Retirement Income Fund.
https://investor.vanguard.com/mutual-fu ... ance/vsmgx
https://personal.vanguard.com/us/funds/ ... =INT#tab=1
https://personal.vanguard.com/us/funds/ ... true#tab=1
There is no point of minimizing taxes and giving up returns.
In my opinion, making investment decisions based only on tax considerations, while important, may be a mistake.
John C. Bogle - Two Fund Portfolio: Total Stock & Total Bond. "Simplicity is the master key to financial success."

User avatar
Bluce
Posts: 477
Joined: Tue May 10, 2011 11:01 pm
Location: Finger Lakes, NYS

Re: Vanguard's Wellesley Income fund is incredible

Post by Bluce » Tue Jan 14, 2020 8:31 pm

abuss368 wrote:
Tue Jan 14, 2020 8:17 pm
In my opinion, making investment decisions based only on tax considerations, while important, may be a mistake.
I agree.

It comes down to this (numbers are just random, to make the point): At the end of the year would you rather have paid $20k in taxes but have $50k in your pocket, or have paid $10k in taxes but only $30k in your pocket?

Being self-employed I get into these debates all the time by the "You can write everything off!" no-knowledge crowd. I am taxed on how much money I have left over, just like anyone else who has personal exemptions.

User avatar
abuss368
Posts: 17197
Joined: Mon Aug 03, 2009 2:33 pm
Location: Where the water is warm, the drinks are cold, and I don't know the names of the players!
Contact:

Re: Vanguard's Wellesley Income fund is incredible

Post by abuss368 » Tue Jan 14, 2020 8:50 pm

Bluce wrote:
Tue Jan 14, 2020 8:31 pm
abuss368 wrote:
Tue Jan 14, 2020 8:17 pm
In my opinion, making investment decisions based only on tax considerations, while important, may be a mistake.
I agree.

It comes down to this (numbers are just random, to make the point): At the end of the year would you rather have paid $20k in taxes but have $50k in your pocket, or have paid $10k in taxes but only $30k in your pocket?

Being self-employed I get into these debates all the time by the "You can write everything off!" no-knowledge crowd. I am taxed on how much money I have left over, just like anyone else who has personal exemptions.
Agree. It is after tax return that is important.
John C. Bogle - Two Fund Portfolio: Total Stock & Total Bond. "Simplicity is the master key to financial success."

ramonsito
Posts: 23
Joined: Mon Dec 28, 2015 11:28 am

Re: Vanguard's Wellesley Income fund is incredible

Post by ramonsito » Tue Jan 14, 2020 8:57 pm

As Taylor Larimore is fond of saying, "There are many roads to Dublin." While many if not most Bogleheads implement a 3-fund (or a 2-fund) approach to their AA, some Bogleheads stray from the straight and narrow path by using actively managed funds like Wellesley and/or Wellington. Some Bogleheads even dare to invest in individual stocks from time to time (in full knowledge of the risks). There really is no single, correct way. We all have our preferences, of course. One benefit of the Boglehead community is to gain insight from other like-minded investors (not clone-minded, but of a similar mindset). A key similarity is the tendency to save in a disciplined manner, and to put that capital to work in [mostly] passive index funds. Wellesley and Wellington have absolutely outstanding records, and it is probable that their success will continue (no guarantees, of course). Best wishes to each of you. My thanks to your aggregate wisdom.

R.

User avatar
AerialWombat
Posts: 1026
Joined: Tue May 29, 2018 1:07 pm

Re: Vanguard's Wellesley Income fund is incredible

Post by AerialWombat » Wed Jan 15, 2020 12:34 am

lassevirensghost wrote:
Tue Jan 14, 2020 7:49 pm
Is the $75 for the initial purchase or do you pay that much each time you add to the position?
Fidelity charges the $75 transaction fee on every purchase, unless you set up automatic investments (then it’s just $5 per transaction).

This is the only reason I do not own Wellesley in my Roth.
“Life doesn’t come with a warranty.” -Michael LeBoeuf

User avatar
Jerry55
Posts: 710
Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2015 1:56 am
Location: That Toddlin' Town

Re: Vanguard's Wellesley Income fund is incredible

Post by Jerry55 » Wed Jan 15, 2020 12:39 am

willthrill81 wrote:
Tue Jan 14, 2020 7:25 pm
Never let the tax tail wag the investment dog.

So very true. Just because someone has Wellesley doesn't mean it's their ONLY holding.
I have Wellesley, but in a ROTH IRA account, primarily due to a VCP conversion that I maxed out, as far as the amount I could contribute
(6 figures). I DID put the remainder into Wellington taxable, but, I also hold my TSP account which comprises 75% of my holdings.

Sometimes, people have to remember that, just because it may not be "Tax Efficient" for them, doesn't mean that's what others are striving for.
Different Strokes for Different Folks I always say....I don't know their intentions, nor would I try to tell them that they're wrong.
Retired CSRS on 12/19/2012 @ age 57 w/39 years | Good Bye Tension, Hello Pension !!!

dkturner
Posts: 1527
Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 7:58 pm

Re: Vanguard's Wellesley Income fund is incredible

Post by dkturner » Wed Jan 15, 2020 4:32 pm

I’ve been tracking the performance of Wellesley versus the Vanguard LifeStrategy Conservative Growth Fund since 1995. For the last 25 years Wellesley has produced annualized returns of 8.55% compared to 6.99% for LifeStrategy Conservative Growth. What I find interesting is over the last 10 years, when “value” stocks trailed the performance of the broad market, Wellesley produced annualized returns of 8.05% compared to 6.61% for LifeStrategy Conservative Growth. So much for the value premium is dead theory.

DB2
Posts: 539
Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2019 10:07 pm

Re: Vanguard's Wellesley Income fund is incredible

Post by DB2 » Wed Jan 15, 2020 4:49 pm

dkturner wrote:
Wed Jan 15, 2020 4:32 pm
I’ve been tracking the performance of Wellesley versus the Vanguard LifeStrategy Conservative Growth Fund since 1995. For the last 25 years Wellesley has produced annualized returns of 8.55% compared to 6.99% for LifeStrategy Conservative Growth. What I find interesting is over the last 10 years, when “value” stocks trailed the performance of the broad market, Wellesley produced annualized returns of 8.05% compared to 6.61% for LifeStrategy Conservative Growth. So much for the value premium is dead theory.
I cannot help but think 'picking' the right value stocks has been key during the Growth stock boom. Some believe Value as a whole is going to come back again and if it does, it will be interesting. I also wonder if the actively managed component with bonds is really a bigger benefit than realized vs index bonds.

columbia
Posts: 2162
Joined: Tue Aug 27, 2013 5:30 am

Re: Vanguard's Wellesley Income fund is incredible

Post by columbia » Wed Jan 15, 2020 7:09 pm

dkturner wrote:
Wed Jan 15, 2020 4:32 pm
I’ve been tracking the performance of Wellesley versus the Vanguard LifeStrategy Conservative Growth Fund since 1995. For the last 25 years Wellesley has produced annualized returns of 8.55% compared to 6.99% for LifeStrategy Conservative Growth. What I find interesting is over the last 10 years, when “value” stocks trailed the performance of the broad market, Wellesley produced annualized returns of 8.05% compared to 6.61% for LifeStrategy Conservative Growth. So much for the value premium is dead theory.
International has dragged down that life strategy fund, of course.

User avatar
abuss368
Posts: 17197
Joined: Mon Aug 03, 2009 2:33 pm
Location: Where the water is warm, the drinks are cold, and I don't know the names of the players!
Contact:

Re: Vanguard's Wellesley Income fund is incredible

Post by abuss368 » Wed Jan 15, 2020 7:10 pm

columbia wrote:
Wed Jan 15, 2020 7:09 pm
dkturner wrote:
Wed Jan 15, 2020 4:32 pm
I’ve been tracking the performance of Wellesley versus the Vanguard LifeStrategy Conservative Growth Fund since 1995. For the last 25 years Wellesley has produced annualized returns of 8.55% compared to 6.99% for LifeStrategy Conservative Growth. What I find interesting is over the last 10 years, when “value” stocks trailed the performance of the broad market, Wellesley produced annualized returns of 8.05% compared to 6.61% for LifeStrategy Conservative Growth. So much for the value premium is dead theory.
International has dragged down that life strategy fund, of course.
Who knows what the future holds but thus far Jack Bogle has been correct.
John C. Bogle - Two Fund Portfolio: Total Stock & Total Bond. "Simplicity is the master key to financial success."

columbia
Posts: 2162
Joined: Tue Aug 27, 2013 5:30 am

Re: Vanguard's Wellesley Income fund is incredible

Post by columbia » Wed Jan 15, 2020 7:12 pm

👍🏻 Indeed

dkturner
Posts: 1527
Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 7:58 pm

Re: Vanguard's Wellesley Income fund is incredible

Post by dkturner » Thu Jan 16, 2020 8:09 am

columbia wrote:
Wed Jan 15, 2020 7:09 pm
dkturner wrote:
Wed Jan 15, 2020 4:32 pm
I’ve been tracking the performance of Wellesley versus the Vanguard LifeStrategy Conservative Growth Fund since 1995. For the last 25 years Wellesley has produced annualized returns of 8.55% compared to 6.99% for LifeStrategy Conservative Growth. What I find interesting is over the last 10 years, when “value” stocks trailed the performance of the broad market, Wellesley produced annualized returns of 8.05% compared to 6.61% for LifeStrategy Conservative Growth. So much for the value premium is dead theory.
International has dragged down that life strategy fund, of course.
Currently 15% of the equities in Wellesley are international - it has varied over time. Over the last 25 years there were times when LifeStrategy Conservative Growth only held 20%-30% of its equity exposure in international equities. In addition, Wellesley’s total equity exposure is usually in the 35-37% range while LifeStrategy Conservative Growth has had a fixed 40% equity allocation. I’ve read on these boards that the composition of the LifeStrategy funds was designed by the “experts” at Vanguard. Personally, I’d rather trust the folks at Wellington Management to determine the allocation of the assets in my mutual fund. I like their mandate to move allocations around when they believe it’s in my best interests.

DB2
Posts: 539
Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2019 10:07 pm

Re: Vanguard's Wellesley Income fund is incredible

Post by DB2 » Thu Jan 16, 2020 9:24 am

As of 12/31/19, according to the Vanguard site, Wellesley is actually holding 40.88% in equities.

The investment policy is pretty interesting especially in regards to international. I do like the agility.

https://investor.vanguard.com/mutual-fu ... olio/vwinx

User avatar
Topic Author
willthrill81
Posts: 15207
Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2017 3:17 pm
Location: USA

Re: Vanguard's Wellesley Income fund is incredible

Post by willthrill81 » Thu Jan 16, 2020 9:47 am

When I provided the update for 2019's returns, I didn't mention that 2019 was the fund's record year in terms of highest returns.
“It's a dangerous business, Frodo, going out your door. You step onto the road, and if you don't keep your feet, there's no knowing where you might be swept off to.” J.R.R. Tolkien,The Lord of the Rings

User avatar
Bluce
Posts: 477
Joined: Tue May 10, 2011 11:01 pm
Location: Finger Lakes, NYS

Re: Vanguard's Wellesley Income fund is incredible

Post by Bluce » Thu Jan 16, 2020 9:49 am

willthrill81 wrote:
Thu Jan 16, 2020 9:47 am
When I provided the update for 2019's returns, I didn't mention that 2019 was the fund's record year in terms of highest returns.
And it's probably because bonds also did very well in addition to stocks being up 30+%.

KlangFool
Posts: 14716
Joined: Sat Oct 11, 2008 12:35 pm

Re: Vanguard's Wellesley Income fund is incredible

Post by KlangFool » Thu Jan 16, 2020 9:53 am

dkturner wrote:
Thu Jan 16, 2020 8:09 am
columbia wrote:
Wed Jan 15, 2020 7:09 pm
dkturner wrote:
Wed Jan 15, 2020 4:32 pm
I’ve been tracking the performance of Wellesley versus the Vanguard LifeStrategy Conservative Growth Fund since 1995. For the last 25 years Wellesley has produced annualized returns of 8.55% compared to 6.99% for LifeStrategy Conservative Growth. What I find interesting is over the last 10 years, when “value” stocks trailed the performance of the broad market, Wellesley produced annualized returns of 8.05% compared to 6.61% for LifeStrategy Conservative Growth. So much for the value premium is dead theory.
International has dragged down that life strategy fund, of course.
Currently 15% of the equities in Wellesley are international - it has varied over time. Over the last 25 years there were times when LifeStrategy Conservative Growth only held 20%-30% of its equity exposure in international equities. In addition, Wellesley’s total equity exposure is usually in the 35-37% range while LifeStrategy Conservative Growth has had a fixed 40% equity allocation. I’ve read on these boards that the composition of the LifeStrategy funds was designed by the “experts” at Vanguard. Personally, I’d rather trust the folks at Wellington Management to determine the allocation of the assets in my mutual fund. I like their mandate to move allocations around when they believe it’s in my best interests.
dkturner,

Is it possible that the superior performance of the Wellesley versus LifeStrategy Conservative Growth has to do with the fixed income side? I do not believe I see the similar outperformance of the Wellington fund versus the LifeStrategy Moderate Growth.

I do not know the answer. Could you please verify?

https://investor.vanguard.com/mutual-fu ... ance/vwenx
https://investor.vanguard.com/mutual-fu ... ance/vwiax

As per the Vanguard's information, VWENX did not beat its benchmark and VWIAX did. Given that they use the same Wellington management for their stock selection, it would seem like it is the fixed income/bond side that gives the win to VWIAX.

KlangFool

rkhusky
Posts: 7891
Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2011 8:09 pm

Re: Vanguard's Wellesley Income fund is incredible

Post by rkhusky » Thu Jan 16, 2020 10:06 am

dkturner wrote:
Wed Jan 15, 2020 4:32 pm
I’ve been tracking the performance of Wellesley versus the Vanguard LifeStrategy Conservative Growth Fund since 1995. For the last 25 years Wellesley has produced annualized returns of 8.55% compared to 6.99% for LifeStrategy Conservative Growth. What I find interesting is over the last 10 years, when “value” stocks trailed the performance of the broad market, Wellesley produced annualized returns of 8.05% compared to 6.61% for LifeStrategy Conservative Growth. So much for the value premium is dead theory.
Are you sure that it is value that was the contributor, or is it that large cap stocks out-performed small and US outperformed Int'l? And/or perhaps it is corporate bonds vs treasury bonds?

I note that during the 5-year period from 2003-2007, LS Cons Growth out-performed Wellesley. So, for any strategy, one needs to be able to stick through longish periods of under-performance without changing course.
Last edited by rkhusky on Thu Jan 16, 2020 10:13 am, edited 1 time in total.

B. Wellington
Posts: 186
Joined: Fri Mar 30, 2012 10:10 am

Re: Vanguard's Wellesley Income fund is incredible

Post by B. Wellington » Thu Jan 16, 2020 10:06 am

dkturner wrote:
Thu Jan 16, 2020 8:09 am
columbia wrote:
Wed Jan 15, 2020 7:09 pm
dkturner wrote:
Wed Jan 15, 2020 4:32 pm
I’ve been tracking the performance of Wellesley versus the Vanguard LifeStrategy Conservative Growth Fund since 1995. For the last 25 years Wellesley has produced annualized returns of 8.55% compared to 6.99% for LifeStrategy Conservative Growth. What I find interesting is over the last 10 years, when “value” stocks trailed the performance of the broad market, Wellesley produced annualized returns of 8.05% compared to 6.61% for LifeStrategy Conservative Growth. So much for the value premium is dead theory.
International has dragged down that life strategy fund, of course.
Currently 15% of the equities in Wellesley are international - it has varied over time. Over the last 25 years there were times when LifeStrategy Conservative Growth only held 20%-30% of its equity exposure in international equities. In addition, Wellesley’s total equity exposure is usually in the 35-37% range while LifeStrategy Conservative Growth has had a fixed 40% equity allocation. I’ve read on these boards that the composition of the LifeStrategy funds was designed by the “experts” at Vanguard. Personally,
I’d rather trust the folks at Wellington Management to determine the allocation of the assets in my mutual fund. I like their mandate to move allocations around when they believe it’s in my best interests.
And there it is...Why some prefer the W/W funds. I believe it has to do more with the bond side (more) than the stock side, especially for Wellesley.

I see Klangfool beat me to it. :sharebeer

Disclosure: Been investing with Wellington Management for many, many years. Along with the Balanced Index fund (which was the Vanguard Asset Allocation fund that merged with the Balanced Index I believe in 2011.

TheDDC
Posts: 588
Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2018 11:11 am

Re: Vanguard's Wellesley Income fund is incredible

Post by TheDDC » Thu Jan 16, 2020 10:13 am

B. Wellington wrote:
Thu Jan 16, 2020 10:06 am
dkturner wrote:
Thu Jan 16, 2020 8:09 am
columbia wrote:
Wed Jan 15, 2020 7:09 pm
dkturner wrote:
Wed Jan 15, 2020 4:32 pm
I’ve been tracking the performance of Wellesley versus the Vanguard LifeStrategy Conservative Growth Fund since 1995. For the last 25 years Wellesley has produced annualized returns of 8.55% compared to 6.99% for LifeStrategy Conservative Growth. What I find interesting is over the last 10 years, when “value” stocks trailed the performance of the broad market, Wellesley produced annualized returns of 8.05% compared to 6.61% for LifeStrategy Conservative Growth. So much for the value premium is dead theory.
International has dragged down that life strategy fund, of course.
Currently 15% of the equities in Wellesley are international - it has varied over time. Over the last 25 years there were times when LifeStrategy Conservative Growth only held 20%-30% of its equity exposure in international equities. In addition, Wellesley’s total equity exposure is usually in the 35-37% range while LifeStrategy Conservative Growth has had a fixed 40% equity allocation. I’ve read on these boards that the composition of the LifeStrategy funds was designed by the “experts” at Vanguard. Personally,
I’d rather trust the folks at Wellington Management to determine the allocation of the assets in my mutual fund. I like their mandate to move allocations around when they believe it’s in my best interests.
And there it is...Why some prefer the W/W funds. I believe it has to do more with the bond side (more) than the stock side, especially for Wellesley.

I see Klangfool beat me to it. :sharebeer

Disclosure: Been investing with Wellington Management for many, many years. Along with the Balanced Index fund (which was the Vanguard Asset Allocation fund that merged with the Balanced Index I believe in 2011.
Bingo. I can't get past the futility of "investing" in bond funds and don't keep them in my own portfolio, but I would gladly pay the Vanguard price (16 bps) for a bond fund manager to navigate the complexities of the debt market if I wanted to keep my funds "stable" in the short term. 10% of those international securities held in Wellesley are international bonds. I doubt most investors even care to understand international bonds.

We all know that active management isn't *bad* when it's cheap, with no loads, and when it actually performs (or maybe even outperform). If you want active management, you have a fighting chance with Vanguard. I have a tough time finding cheap, well performing, active funds elsewhere. This is also why W/W is, culturally, most fitting with the mindset of a "hands off" retiree.

-TheDDC
Refreshingly, a double barrel shotgun blast of truth... | Rules to wealth building: 100% VTSAX piled high and deep, 0% given away to banks, minimize amount given to health care industrial complex

FactualFran
Posts: 982
Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2015 2:29 pm

Re: Vanguard's Wellesley Income fund is incredible

Post by FactualFran » Thu Jan 16, 2020 2:00 pm

willthrill81 wrote:
Thu Jan 16, 2020 9:47 am
When I provided the update for 2019's returns, I didn't mention that 2019 was the fund's record year in terms of highest returns.
According to the annual total return history of the Vanguard Wellesley fund at Yahoo, the highest return was 28.91% for 1995. Not the 16.39% for 2019.

dkturner
Posts: 1527
Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 7:58 pm

Re: Vanguard's Wellesley Income fund is incredible

Post by dkturner » Thu Jan 16, 2020 2:09 pm

KlangFool wrote:
Thu Jan 16, 2020 9:53 am
dkturner wrote:
Thu Jan 16, 2020 8:09 am
columbia wrote:
Wed Jan 15, 2020 7:09 pm
dkturner wrote:
Wed Jan 15, 2020 4:32 pm
I’ve been tracking the performance of Wellesley versus the Vanguard LifeStrategy Conservative Growth Fund since 1995. For the last 25 years Wellesley has produced annualized returns of 8.55% compared to 6.99% for LifeStrategy Conservative Growth. What I find interesting is over the last 10 years, when “value” stocks trailed the performance of the broad market, Wellesley produced annualized returns of 8.05% compared to 6.61% for LifeStrategy Conservative Growth. So much for the value premium is dead theory.
International has dragged down that life strategy fund, of course.
Currently 15% of the equities in Wellesley are international - it has varied over time. Over the last 25 years there were times when LifeStrategy Conservative Growth only held 20%-30% of its equity exposure in international equities. In addition, Wellesley’s total equity exposure is usually in the 35-37% range while LifeStrategy Conservative Growth has had a fixed 40% equity allocation. I’ve read on these boards that the composition of the LifeStrategy funds was designed by the “experts” at Vanguard. Personally, I’d rather trust the folks at Wellington Management to determine the allocation of the assets in my mutual fund. I like their mandate to move allocations around when they believe it’s in my best interests.
dkturner,

Is it possible that the superior performance of the Wellesley versus LifeStrategy Conservative Growth has to do with the fixed income side? I do not believe I see the similar outperformance of the Wellington fund versus the LifeStrategy Moderate Growth.

I do not know the answer. Could you please verify?

https://investor.vanguard.com/mutual-fu ... ance/vwenx
https://investor.vanguard.com/mutual-fu ... ance/vwiax

As per the Vanguard's information, VWENX did not beat its benchmark and VWIAX did. Given that they use the same Wellington management for their stock selection, it would seem like it is the fixed income/bond side that gives the win to VWIAX.

KlangFool
The bond holdings of Wellesley and Wellington are very similar, not so for the equity holdings. If you go to the Vanguard website, and look at the holdings of these two funds, you will see the differences.

User avatar
Electron
Posts: 1938
Joined: Sat Mar 10, 2007 8:46 pm

Re: Vanguard's Wellesley Income fund is incredible

Post by Electron » Thu Jan 16, 2020 2:14 pm

The incredible performance of Wellesley Income since 2000 has been mentioned many times in this thread, but the chart is still worth viewing for those who haven't seen it. Note the performance relative to the S&P 500 from that starting date.

http://quotes.morningstar.com/chart/fun ... A%5B%5D%7D

The tech bubble was a very interesting period with growth significantly outperforming value for many years. After the peak, there was a reversal and value stocks took the lead for a period of time. Bonds performed very well and that performance continued in the decades that followed.
Electron

S_Track
Posts: 314
Joined: Sat Feb 18, 2017 12:33 pm

Re: Vanguard's Wellesley Income fund is incredible

Post by S_Track » Thu Jan 16, 2020 2:17 pm

dkturner wrote:
Thu Jan 16, 2020 2:09 pm
KlangFool wrote:
Thu Jan 16, 2020 9:53 am
dkturner wrote:
Thu Jan 16, 2020 8:09 am
columbia wrote:
Wed Jan 15, 2020 7:09 pm
dkturner wrote:
Wed Jan 15, 2020 4:32 pm
I’ve been tracking the performance of Wellesley versus the Vanguard LifeStrategy Conservative Growth Fund since 1995. For the last 25 years Wellesley has produced annualized returns of 8.55% compared to 6.99% for LifeStrategy Conservative Growth. What I find interesting is over the last 10 years, when “value” stocks trailed the performance of the broad market, Wellesley produced annualized returns of 8.05% compared to 6.61% for LifeStrategy Conservative Growth. So much for the value premium is dead theory.
International has dragged down that life strategy fund, of course.
Currently 15% of the equities in Wellesley are international - it has varied over time. Over the last 25 years there were times when LifeStrategy Conservative Growth only held 20%-30% of its equity exposure in international equities. In addition, Wellesley’s total equity exposure is usually in the 35-37% range while LifeStrategy Conservative Growth has had a fixed 40% equity allocation. I’ve read on these boards that the composition of the LifeStrategy funds was designed by the “experts” at Vanguard. Personally, I’d rather trust the folks at Wellington Management to determine the allocation of the assets in my mutual fund. I like their mandate to move allocations around when they believe it’s in my best interests.
dkturner,

Is it possible that the superior performance of the Wellesley versus LifeStrategy Conservative Growth has to do with the fixed income side? I do not believe I see the similar outperformance of the Wellington fund versus the LifeStrategy Moderate Growth.

I do not know the answer. Could you please verify?

https://investor.vanguard.com/mutual-fu ... ance/vwenx
https://investor.vanguard.com/mutual-fu ... ance/vwiax

As per the Vanguard's information, VWENX did not beat its benchmark and VWIAX did. Given that they use the same Wellington management for their stock selection, it would seem like it is the fixed income/bond side that gives the win to VWIAX.

KlangFool
The bond holdings of Wellesley and Wellington are very similar, not so for the equity holdings. If you go to the Vanguard website, and look at the holdings of these two funds, you will see the differences.
I think Wellesley selects large companies that currently distribute higher dividends compared to the others. Wellington is not limited to this.

KlangFool
Posts: 14716
Joined: Sat Oct 11, 2008 12:35 pm

Re: Vanguard's Wellesley Income fund is incredible

Post by KlangFool » Thu Jan 16, 2020 2:28 pm

dkturner wrote:
Thu Jan 16, 2020 2:09 pm
KlangFool wrote:
Thu Jan 16, 2020 9:53 am
dkturner wrote:
Thu Jan 16, 2020 8:09 am
columbia wrote:
Wed Jan 15, 2020 7:09 pm
dkturner wrote:
Wed Jan 15, 2020 4:32 pm
I’ve been tracking the performance of Wellesley versus the Vanguard LifeStrategy Conservative Growth Fund since 1995. For the last 25 years Wellesley has produced annualized returns of 8.55% compared to 6.99% for LifeStrategy Conservative Growth. What I find interesting is over the last 10 years, when “value” stocks trailed the performance of the broad market, Wellesley produced annualized returns of 8.05% compared to 6.61% for LifeStrategy Conservative Growth. So much for the value premium is dead theory.
International has dragged down that life strategy fund, of course.
Currently 15% of the equities in Wellesley are international - it has varied over time. Over the last 25 years there were times when LifeStrategy Conservative Growth only held 20%-30% of its equity exposure in international equities. In addition, Wellesley’s total equity exposure is usually in the 35-37% range while LifeStrategy Conservative Growth has had a fixed 40% equity allocation. I’ve read on these boards that the composition of the LifeStrategy funds was designed by the “experts” at Vanguard. Personally, I’d rather trust the folks at Wellington Management to determine the allocation of the assets in my mutual fund. I like their mandate to move allocations around when they believe it’s in my best interests.
dkturner,

Is it possible that the superior performance of the Wellesley versus LifeStrategy Conservative Growth has to do with the fixed income side? I do not believe I see the similar outperformance of the Wellington fund versus the LifeStrategy Moderate Growth.

I do not know the answer. Could you please verify?

https://investor.vanguard.com/mutual-fu ... ance/vwenx
https://investor.vanguard.com/mutual-fu ... ance/vwiax

As per the Vanguard's information, VWENX did not beat its benchmark and VWIAX did. Given that they use the same Wellington management for their stock selection, it would seem like it is the fixed income/bond side that gives the win to VWIAX.

KlangFool
The bond holdings of Wellesley and Wellington are very similar, not so for the equity holdings. If you go to the Vanguard website, and look at the holdings of these two funds, you will see the differences.
dkturner,

But,

Wellington fund is a 65/35 fund

Wellesley fund is a 35/65 fund.

If Wellesley outperforms another 35/65 fund, it is possible the bond side that is causing the outperformance. As for the Wellington fund, the 35% bond side might be outperforming but it is not big enough to compensate for the underperformance of LCV versus the market.

KlangFool

S_Track
Posts: 314
Joined: Sat Feb 18, 2017 12:33 pm

Re: Vanguard's Wellesley Income fund is incredible

Post by S_Track » Thu Jan 16, 2020 2:31 pm

Electron wrote:
Thu Jan 16, 2020 2:14 pm
The incredible performance of Wellesley Income since 2000 has been mentioned many times in this thread, but the chart is still worth viewing for those who haven't seen it. Note the performance relative to the S&P 500 from that starting date.

http://quotes.morningstar.com/chart/fun ... A%5B%5D%7D

The tech bubble was a very interesting period with growth significantly outperforming value for many years. After the peak, there was a reversal and value stocks took the lead for a period of time. Bonds performed very well and that performance continued in the decades that followed.
Thanks for the chart, very good past performance. I use Wellesley in my three fund, I mix 25% Wellesley with VG Life Strategy conservative growth, then add Total Stock until I reached my desired aa.

KlangFool
Posts: 14716
Joined: Sat Oct 11, 2008 12:35 pm

Re: Vanguard's Wellesley Income fund is incredible

Post by KlangFool » Thu Jan 16, 2020 2:32 pm

S_Track wrote:
Thu Jan 16, 2020 2:17 pm

I think Wellesley selects large companies that currently distribute higher dividends compared to the others. Wellington is not limited to this.
S_Track,

I do not know. That is why I asked. But, logically, Wellesley is a 35/65 fund. If it outperforms a 40/60 fund, it could be due to the bond side.

<<I think Wellesley selects large companies that currently distribute higher dividends compared to the others.>>

If that is true, Wellesley's stock side would be underperforming as compared to the market index. The market index is beating LCV because LCG is doing so well.

KlangFool

User avatar
Topic Author
willthrill81
Posts: 15207
Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2017 3:17 pm
Location: USA

Re: Vanguard's Wellesley Income fund is incredible

Post by willthrill81 » Thu Jan 16, 2020 2:56 pm

FactualFran wrote:
Thu Jan 16, 2020 2:00 pm
willthrill81 wrote:
Thu Jan 16, 2020 9:47 am
When I provided the update for 2019's returns, I didn't mention that 2019 was the fund's record year in terms of highest returns.
According to the annual total return history of the Vanguard Wellesley fund at Yahoo, the highest return was 28.91% for 1995. Not the 16.39% for 2019.
Good catch.
“It's a dangerous business, Frodo, going out your door. You step onto the road, and if you don't keep your feet, there's no knowing where you might be swept off to.” J.R.R. Tolkien,The Lord of the Rings

DB2
Posts: 539
Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2019 10:07 pm

Re: Vanguard's Wellesley Income fund is incredible

Post by DB2 » Thu Jan 16, 2020 3:43 pm

Klangfool has a good point. However, perhaps the stock picking is not only helping on the bond side but also the LCV side despite the overall performance of Value being disappointing the last 10 -15 years relatively speaking (compared to overall market and Growth).

With that said, I ran across an interesting article about greater rotation into LCV as of late:

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/01/16/the-hug ... -says.html

Unladen_Swallow
Posts: 182
Joined: Tue Dec 10, 2019 6:12 pm

Re: Vanguard's Wellesley Income fund is incredible

Post by Unladen_Swallow » Thu Jan 16, 2020 5:55 pm

Bluce wrote:
Tue Jan 14, 2020 8:31 pm
abuss368 wrote:
Tue Jan 14, 2020 8:17 pm
In my opinion, making investment decisions based only on tax considerations, while important, may be a mistake.
I agree.

It comes down to this (numbers are just random, to make the point): At the end of the year would you rather have paid $20k in taxes but have $50k in your pocket, or have paid $10k in taxes but only $30k in your pocket?

Being self-employed I get into these debates all the time by the "You can write everything off!" no-knowledge crowd. I am taxed on how much money I have left over, just like anyone else who has personal exemptions.
I laughed at this. I can empathize. :beer
"I think it's much more interesting to live not knowing than to have answers which might be wrong." - Richard Feynman

hoops777
Posts: 2765
Joined: Sun Apr 10, 2011 12:23 pm

Re: Vanguard's Wellesley Income fund is incredible

Post by hoops777 » Thu Jan 16, 2020 6:24 pm

It is also possible that they just have excellent stock pickers
K.I.S.S........so easy to say so difficult to do.

User avatar
Bluce
Posts: 477
Joined: Tue May 10, 2011 11:01 pm
Location: Finger Lakes, NYS

Re: Vanguard's Wellesley Income fund is incredible

Post by Bluce » Thu Jan 16, 2020 6:56 pm

Unladen_Swallow wrote:
Thu Jan 16, 2020 5:55 pm
Bluce wrote:
Tue Jan 14, 2020 8:31 pm
abuss368 wrote:
Tue Jan 14, 2020 8:17 pm
In my opinion, making investment decisions based only on tax considerations, while important, may be a mistake.
I agree.

It comes down to this (numbers are just random, to make the point): At the end of the year would you rather have paid $20k in taxes but have $50k in your pocket, or have paid $10k in taxes but only $30k in your pocket?

Being self-employed I get into these debates all the time by the "You can write everything off!" no-knowledge crowd. I am taxed on how much money I have left over, just like anyone else who has personal exemptions.
I laughed at this. I can empathize. :beer
:sharebeer Not to be a jerk, but it seems the only people (that I run into, anyway) who understand how the tax system works for self-employeds is accountants, the IRS, or other self-employeds. It works the same way as people who are not self-employed: You are taxed on how much money you have left over after (allowed, legitimate) expenses.

Expenses in business is money you no longer have; it is gone. You spent it in order to produce your gross income.

Post Reply