How to realistically FIRE?
-
- Posts: 3145
- Joined: Mon Mar 04, 2019 8:52 am
How to realistically FIRE?
Simple question.
Is 25x expenses/spending really a “safe” way to look at one’s ability or preparedness to retire? I realize it get safer to use such “rules of thumb” as you get older, but even for a 50 year old, is it still “within the margin of safety” to use the 25x figure? Two SSs will be there, but not using it in any calculations. Inheritances not calculated, either.
Portfolio is 60/40 using the 3 Fund Portfolio.
Is 25x expenses/spending really a “safe” way to look at one’s ability or preparedness to retire? I realize it get safer to use such “rules of thumb” as you get older, but even for a 50 year old, is it still “within the margin of safety” to use the 25x figure? Two SSs will be there, but not using it in any calculations. Inheritances not calculated, either.
Portfolio is 60/40 using the 3 Fund Portfolio.
Being wrong compounds forever.
-
- Posts: 18499
- Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2013 6:05 am
- Location: 26 miles, 385 yards west of Copley Square
Re: How to realistically FIRE?
25X gets you 30 years of retirement. Will you and your spouse be dead in 30 years, for sure? If so, you're good to go.
Bogle: Smart Beta is stupid
Re: How to realistically FIRE?
Ha! Ha! You had to use the word "Simple" for a complicated question.
See this complicated 28+ part series with your answer: https://earlyretirementnow.com/2016/12/ ... t-1-intro/
See this complicated 28+ part series with your answer: https://earlyretirementnow.com/2016/12/ ... t-1-intro/
- market timer
- Posts: 6535
- Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2007 1:42 am
Re: How to realistically FIRE?
I'd feel pretty comfortable on 25 x $100K/year at age 50 (i.e., healthy discretionary budget that could be cut). I'd be worried if it's 25 x $35K/year (lean FIRE).
Re: How to realistically FIRE?
Sounds like you are either at 25x or are close.
I have about 47x of annual expenses saved (in accounts of varying tax treatments) and I'm still afraid to pull the retirement ripcord.
Also not counting SS nor potential inheritance. 55, single.
I'll be paying close attention to this thread.
I have about 47x of annual expenses saved (in accounts of varying tax treatments) and I'm still afraid to pull the retirement ripcord.
Also not counting SS nor potential inheritance. 55, single.
I'll be paying close attention to this thread.
"Happiness Is Not My Companion" - Gen. Gouverneur K. Warren. |
(Avatar is the statue of Gen. Warren atop Little Round Top @ Gettysburg National Military Park.)
-
- Posts: 25625
- Joined: Thu Apr 05, 2007 8:20 pm
- Location: New York
Re: How to realistically FIRE?
When you turn 59.5, get out! Retire.samsoes wrote: ↑Thu Mar 14, 2019 9:12 am Sounds like you are either at 25x or are close.
I have about 47x of annual expenses saved (in accounts of varying tax treatments) and I'm still afraid to pull the retirement ripcord.
Also not counting SS nor potential inheritance. 55, single.
I'll be paying close attention to this thread.
You’re afraid of what? If you make it to 85, you have more than enough now. Unless you truly like to work. A 50/50 portfolio will see you through the end.
"One should invest based on their need, ability and willingness to take risk - Larry Swedroe" Asking Portfolio Questions
Re: How to realistically FIRE?
I think the formula is really (# of years left to live ) * expenses.Wanderingwheelz wrote: ↑Thu Mar 14, 2019 9:06 am Simple question.
Is 25x expenses/spending really a “safe” way to look at one’s ability or preparedness to retire? I realize it get safer to use such “rules of thumb” as you get older, but even for a 50 year old, is it still “within the margin of safety” to use the 25x figure? Two SSs will be there, but not using it in any calculations. Inheritances not calculated, either.
Portfolio is 60/40 using the 3 Fund Portfolio.
At age 50 I would want 40 * expenses.
At 65, 25 * expenses works well.
-
- Posts: 4386
- Joined: Mon May 26, 2008 10:20 am
- Location: Second star on the right and straight on 'til morning
Re: How to realistically FIRE?
Simple answer.Wanderingwheelz wrote: ↑Thu Mar 14, 2019 9:06 am Is 25x expenses/spending really a “safe” way to look at one’s ability or preparedness to retire?
It depends.
See livesoft's reply for things to consider.
On a different note, I'm trying to learn to live with uncertainty because I've come to believe that there is no safe withdrawal rate that will totally mitigate the effects of all sequence(s) of return risk. Or, there are no guarantees that you won't go broke in every circumstance.
Last edited by RadAudit on Thu Mar 14, 2019 9:33 am, edited 2 times in total.
FI is the best revenge. LBYM. Invest the rest. Stay the course. Die anyway. - PS: The cavalry isn't coming, kids. You are on your own.
Re: How to realistically FIRE?
Correct. There is no simple rule for safety that can give you absolute insurance. Any approach to early retirement, or any retirement, implies approximation, flexibility, and uncertainty. Probably the more important thing is how much margin or error do you have on what you want to spend and what is Plan B if the worst cases actually materialize.livesoft wrote: ↑Thu Mar 14, 2019 9:11 am Ha! Ha! You had to use the word "Simple" for a complicated question.
See this complicated 28+ part series with your answer: https://earlyretirementnow.com/2016/12/ ... t-1-intro/
-
- Posts: 871
- Joined: Sat Mar 18, 2017 7:12 pm
Re: How to realistically FIRE?
Odds are far more likely you will end up with multiple times your original nest egg rather than use it up, but "safety" is such an abstract and personal concept that no one can apply a mathematical formula. To me, running out of money at 25x, and living long enough for that to be a problem, is on the order of a black swan. The only reason it seems terrible is because we can imagine it--which I guess means being on medicaid in some low-quality nursing home or something, which is about the worst case for anyone who ever had a bunch of money. Dying before you use up your money is the most probable outcome.
I see it as a matter of how much risk you are willing to take to live the life you prefer. I have a general idea what mine is, but I wouldn't declare it a truth for anyone else. That's why I love these posts and forum--refining my own concept based on other people's attitudes.
I don't think there's a realistic way to FIRE because life happens. It's like the old joke: "He died penniless. He timed it perfectly."
I see it as a matter of how much risk you are willing to take to live the life you prefer. I have a general idea what mine is, but I wouldn't declare it a truth for anyone else. That's why I love these posts and forum--refining my own concept based on other people's attitudes.
I don't think there's a realistic way to FIRE because life happens. It's like the old joke: "He died penniless. He timed it perfectly."
I'm not smart enough to know, and I can't afford to guess.
-
- Posts: 344
- Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2019 5:54 pm
Re: How to realistically FIRE?
I am just going to assume that you don't have anything better to do than work.samsoes wrote: ↑Thu Mar 14, 2019 9:12 am Sounds like you are either at 25x or are close.
I have about 47x of annual expenses saved (in accounts of varying tax treatments) and I'm still afraid to pull the retirement ripcord.
Also not counting SS nor potential inheritance. 55, single.
I'll be paying close attention to this thread.
- ruralavalon
- Posts: 26351
- Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 9:29 am
- Location: Illinois
Re: How to realistically FIRE?
The 60/40 asset allocation is reasonable. You said "Two SSs will be there, but not using it in any calculations. Inheritances not calculated, either", so the 25x rule of thumb is likely very suitable as a planning tool.Wanderingwheelz wrote: ↑Thu Mar 14, 2019 9:06 am Simple question.
Is 25x expenses/spending really a “safe” way to look at one’s ability or preparedness to retire? I realize it get safer to use such “rules of thumb” as you get older, but even for a 50 year old, is it still “within the margin of safety” to use the 25x figure? Two SSs will be there, but not using it in any calculations. Inheritances not calculated, either.
Portfolio is 60/40 using the 3 Fund Portfolio.
"Everything should be as simple as it is, but not simpler." - Albert Einstein |
Wiki article link: Bogleheads® investment philosophy
Re: How to realistically FIRE?
In my opinion it's pretty safe at 50. I think the degree of safety really depends on flexibility with spending. At 50 I had minor children and wanted to get them through college. Without such commitments I might have made the leap myself. I know that many Bogleheads would be horrified at such a sanguine attitude.Wanderingwheelz wrote: ↑Thu Mar 14, 2019 9:06 am
Is 25x expenses/spending really a “safe” way to look at one’s ability or preparedness to retire?
Retired 12/31/2015
Re: How to realistically FIRE?
Wanderingwheelz,Wanderingwheelz wrote: ↑Thu Mar 14, 2019 9:06 am Simple question.
Is 25x expenses/spending really a “safe” way to look at one’s ability or preparedness to retire? I realize it get safer to use such “rules of thumb” as you get older, but even for a 50 year old, is it still “within the margin of safety” to use the 25x figure? Two SSs will be there, but not using it in any calculations. Inheritances not calculated, either.
Portfolio is 60/40 using the 3 Fund Portfolio.
The answer is highly dependent on your annual expense.
For example, if your annual expense is 60K and you are around 50 years old, your number is 1.5 million. But, your social security benefit with 2 persons, is probably around 30K per year. So, your 1.5 million is 50X when you can withdraw social security. You have a big safety margin because of the social security cover 50% of the annual expense. Meanwhile, for someone with 120K of annual expense, the 25X number = 3 million may not be good enough.
KlangFool
30% VWENX | 16% VFWAX/VTIAX | 14.5% VTSAX | 19.5% VBTLX | 10% VSIAX/VTMSX/VSMAX | 10% VSIGX| 30% Wellington 50% 3-funds 20% Mini-Larry
Re: How to realistically FIRE?
The most vocal people on FIREing at 25x and young are those who still have income from a business they started. It’s easy to retire when you still work for money. However, if in you’re in your 50s you have $2 million plus and live on $80k and have plenty of room to reduce that expenditure I think you’d be fine...especially with Social Security on the horizon.Wanderingwheelz wrote: ↑Thu Mar 14, 2019 9:06 am Simple question.
Is 25x expenses/spending really a “safe” way to look at one’s ability or preparedness to retire? I realize it get safer to use such “rules of thumb” as you get older, but even for a 50 year old, is it still “within the margin of safety” to use the 25x figure? Two SSs will be there, but not using it in any calculations. Inheritances not calculated, either.
Portfolio is 60/40 using the 3 Fund Portfolio.
Re: How to realistically FIRE?
I think the FIRE movement is different for a lot of people. For a lot of FIRE bloggers and practitioners the "retirement" portion is quitting the 9-5 job. There is still the open door for part time work, side hustles, starting a business, et al - but the money in the bank allows for the Financial Independence to pursue this - and still have basic needs met.
Also, FIRE bloggers don't guarantee that 4% is successful, and advocate flexibility in your spending in the event of poor markets.
However, looking at Firecalc with a spend of $40k and a investment of $1M at the start, Making it 30 years without running out of money is just about 95%. However, a better number is the average at the end of $1.8M after 30 years - this is also inflation adjusted. So even withdrawing 4% each year, using a historical average you would end up not depleting but actually growing your stash over time.
However even if you put a 4% withdraw rate for 60 years there is an 83% success rate (this is with rigid withdraw of 4% each year) - some flexibility with withdraw rate would increase this success rate. There are a lot of people willing to take this risk instead of working several extra years.
Also, FIRE bloggers don't guarantee that 4% is successful, and advocate flexibility in your spending in the event of poor markets.
However, looking at Firecalc with a spend of $40k and a investment of $1M at the start, Making it 30 years without running out of money is just about 95%. However, a better number is the average at the end of $1.8M after 30 years - this is also inflation adjusted. So even withdrawing 4% each year, using a historical average you would end up not depleting but actually growing your stash over time.
However even if you put a 4% withdraw rate for 60 years there is an 83% success rate (this is with rigid withdraw of 4% each year) - some flexibility with withdraw rate would increase this success rate. There are a lot of people willing to take this risk instead of working several extra years.
"The one who covets is the poorer man, |
For he would have that which he never can; |
But he who doesn't have and doesn't crave |
Is rich, though you may hold him but a knave." - Wife of Bath tale
Re: How to realistically FIRE?
If you're not counting SS, you'll almost certainly be fine, even retiring at 50 (assuming SS is a decent chunk... If you plan of spending $50k-$100k a year, SS will be a big boost - if you plan on spending $300k a year, SS won't help that much).Wanderingwheelz wrote: ↑Thu Mar 14, 2019 9:06 am Simple question.
Is 25x expenses/spending really a “safe” way to look at one’s ability or preparedness to retire? I realize it get safer to use such “rules of thumb” as you get older, but even for a 50 year old, is it still “within the margin of safety” to use the 25x figure? Two SSs will be there, but not using it in any calculations. Inheritances not calculated, either.
Portfolio is 60/40 using the 3 Fund Portfolio.
It's also helps a lot if you have discretionary expenses.
I wouldn't be comfortable retiring at 50 with 25x expenses if that was bare-bones expenses, but if you have included a lot of fun money in there (and you're okay with cutting back a bit in bad times), then again, I think you're good.
"The best tools available to us are shovels, not scalpels. Don't get carried away." - vanBogle59
Re: How to realistically FIRE?
You could retire today. You have 47 years of expenses. The math is not hard.samsoes wrote: ↑Thu Mar 14, 2019 9:12 am Sounds like you are either at 25x or are close.
I have about 47x of annual expenses saved (in accounts of varying tax treatments) and I'm still afraid to pull the retirement ripcord.
Also not counting SS nor potential inheritance. 55, single.
I'll be paying close attention to this thread.
And you're not counting SS.
"The best tools available to us are shovels, not scalpels. Don't get carried away." - vanBogle59
- WoodSpinner
- Posts: 3504
- Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2017 12:15 pm
Re: How to realistically FIRE?
Samsones,samsoes wrote: ↑Thu Mar 14, 2019 9:12 am Sounds like you are either at 25x or are close.
I have about 47x of annual expenses saved (in accounts of varying tax treatments) and I'm still afraid to pull the retirement ripcord.
Also not counting SS nor potential inheritance. 55, single.
I'll be paying close attention to this thread.
Noticed your comment and wondered what additional information you might need for a decision.
Perhaps start your own thread so we can help?
WoodSpinner
WoodSpinner
Re: How to realistically FIRE?
Why are you discounting/ignoring SS? That leads to inaccurate assumptions of income streams, and then you get inaccurate results of what's needed to cover expenses (GIGO).Wanderingwheelz wrote: ↑Thu Mar 14, 2019 9:06 am Simple question.
Is 25x expenses/spending really a “safe” way to look at one’s ability or preparedness to retire? I realize it get safer to use such “rules of thumb” as you get older, but even for a 50 year old, is it still “within the margin of safety” to use the 25x figure? Two SSs will be there, but not using it in any calculations. Inheritances not calculated, either.
Portfolio is 60/40 using the 3 Fund Portfolio.
If you have a SS benefit (or dual benefits) and want to go ahead and discount them to some reasonable percentage--with no accurate way of knowing what the discount should or might be--then go ahead and do that.
But, for example in my case, if I ignored SS/pensions in my calculations I would need $3m. When I don't, I need $700k. Big difference, no? Are you also assuming Medicare will go bust?
Re: How to realistically FIRE?
The market could drop 50% and stay there 2 decades, the US could devalue it's currency by 50%, and SS could be cut and things might be close with only 47xHomerJ wrote: ↑Thu Mar 14, 2019 9:42 amYou could retire today. You have 47 years of expenses. The math is not hard.samsoes wrote: ↑Thu Mar 14, 2019 9:12 am Sounds like you are either at 25x or are close.
I have about 47x of annual expenses saved (in accounts of varying tax treatments) and I'm still afraid to pull the retirement ripcord.
Also not counting SS nor potential inheritance. 55, single.
I'll be paying close attention to this thread.
And you're not counting SS.
You can always find something to worry about or ways to be more conservative. Maybe the future is 0%(or negative) SWR. Realistically something in the 25x-30x range has been safe historically and normally with a pretty big margin. We have had these discussions 2x week for years. There is nothing that anyone can say that can eliminate the fear of the unknown. You have to learn to deal with it.
- Darth Xanadu
- Posts: 1108
- Joined: Sat Jan 27, 2018 12:47 am
- Location: MA
Re: How to realistically FIRE?
+1harvestbook wrote: ↑Thu Mar 14, 2019 9:26 am
I see it as a matter of how much risk you are willing to take to live the life you prefer. I have a general idea what mine is, but I wouldn't declare it a truth for anyone else. That's why I love these posts and forum--refining my own concept based on other people's attitudes.
See The Time Lord's concurrent and lively thread for more thought-provoking discussion in this vein.
Re: How to realistically FIRE?
It depends (but then again, doesn't it always depend?). That rule of thumb has tended to work well for about 30 years of retirement.Wanderingwheelz wrote: ↑Thu Mar 14, 2019 9:06 am Simple question.
Is 25x expenses/spending really a “safe” way to look at one’s ability or preparedness to retire?
Do you expect to have only 30 years of retirement? Do you know now what your expenses/spending will be for the next 30 years?
If you aren't sure, you might want to take a bit deeper dive on the "simple" question.
This isn't just my wallet. It's an organizer, a memory and an old friend.
Re: How to realistically FIRE?
The obvious answer is FIRL
Re: How to realistically FIRE?
***Reminder*** That Fire does not mean to never earn an income again... but that you can choose your path and not answer to anyone....
If you really want to "Retire" with the old way of thinking and never earn income, then you need to plan further out than fire #'s
But even at 25X you will be better off then 80% of people in the US and better off then 95% of the people around the world.
HAHA i myself am investing all my $$ just to go live semi-poor in Asia for my life.,... crazy huh? when I could just go live there semi-poor without 600K....
Funny how we fret that we got it so damn good...
If you really want to "Retire" with the old way of thinking and never earn income, then you need to plan further out than fire #'s
But even at 25X you will be better off then 80% of people in the US and better off then 95% of the people around the world.
HAHA i myself am investing all my $$ just to go live semi-poor in Asia for my life.,... crazy huh? when I could just go live there semi-poor without 600K....
Funny how we fret that we got it so damn good...
Re: How to realistically FIRE?
So they got wrong the “R” as well ?
Sure. The poorest 20% in the US fares a lot better than the wealthiest 20% in Somalia, but who would want to live and retire under Somali standards ?
Re: How to realistically FIRE?
That who must be me.. My plan (at different stages) gets me to Thailand with a annual budget of 18K - 30K.. That covers well over my survival expenses, and some to enjoy at different levels, but ii'll be 40.. FIRE is not for people over 55 in my opinion, if its not before 45 is is really early? and In the FIRE community we do not talk about retire as the old version, yes it as a definition, and is only in FIRE cause FIRE is a cool acronym. FI is where it all really matters... Can you support yourself for a sustained about of time? that is key, and if you want to earn some cash doing something that is fine, you are still "retired" in the FIRE community.. cause it is about choice and taking full control of you life.. not some employers will..
- willthrill81
- Posts: 32250
- Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2017 2:17 pm
- Location: USA
- Contact:
Re: How to realistically FIRE?
I don't blame the OP at all for ignoring SS. In many situations, deferring SS benefits until age 70 is viewed as optimal since doing so can provide effective longevity insurance. But the net present value of SS benefits that won't begin for 20 years may not really move the needle much. The NPV of SS benefits for a 70 year old might only be around $250k, and a 4% discount rate means that would be worth just $114k to a 50 year old. Combine that with the uncertainty surrounding what SS benefits will be in 15 years. Ignoring that is unlikely to change the OP's decision or planning much.Admiral wrote: ↑Thu Mar 14, 2019 9:58 amWhy are you discounting/ignoring SS? That leads to inaccurate assumptions of income streams, and then you get inaccurate results of what's needed to cover expenses (GIGO).Wanderingwheelz wrote: ↑Thu Mar 14, 2019 9:06 am Simple question.
Is 25x expenses/spending really a “safe” way to look at one’s ability or preparedness to retire? I realize it get safer to use such “rules of thumb” as you get older, but even for a 50 year old, is it still “within the margin of safety” to use the 25x figure? Two SSs will be there, but not using it in any calculations. Inheritances not calculated, either.
Portfolio is 60/40 using the 3 Fund Portfolio.
If you have a SS benefit (or dual benefits) and want to go ahead and discount them to some reasonable percentage--with no accurate way of knowing what the discount should or might be--then go ahead and do that.
But, for example in my case, if I ignored SS/pensions in my calculations I would need $3m. When I don't, I need $700k. Big difference, no? Are you also assuming Medicare will go bust?
Pensions can be a different matter entirely due to them starting earlier and potentially providing a much greater payout.
The Sensible Steward
Re: How to realistically FIRE?
Then the people with a blog, side business etc are FI, not FIRE.sjt wrote: ↑Thu Mar 14, 2019 9:37 am I think the FIRE movement is different for a lot of people. For a lot of FIRE bloggers and practitioners the "retirement" portion is quitting the 9-5 job. There is still the open door for part time work, side hustles, starting a business, et al - but the money in the bank allows for the Financial Independence to pursue this - and still have basic needs met.
- willthrill81
- Posts: 32250
- Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2017 2:17 pm
- Location: USA
- Contact:
Re: How to realistically FIRE?
Fritz from The Retirement Manifesto believes that the 'RE' should stand for 'recreational employment'.Dottie57 wrote: ↑Thu Mar 14, 2019 10:46 amThen the people with a blog, side business etc are FI, not FIRE.sjt wrote: ↑Thu Mar 14, 2019 9:37 am I think the FIRE movement is different for a lot of people. For a lot of FIRE bloggers and practitioners the "retirement" portion is quitting the 9-5 job. There is still the open door for part time work, side hustles, starting a business, et al - but the money in the bank allows for the Financial Independence to pursue this - and still have basic needs met.
Also, FIRE bloggers don't guarantee that 4% is successful, and advocate flexibility in your spending in the event of poor markets.
However, looking at Firecalc with a spend of $40k and a investment of $1M at the start, Making it 30 years without running out of money is just about 95%. However, a better number is the average at the end of $1.8M after 30 years - this is also inflation adjusted. So even withdrawing 4% each year, using a historical average you would end up not depleting but actually growing your stash over time.
However even if you put a 4% withdraw rate for 60 years there is an 83% success rate (this is with rigid withdraw of 4% each year) - some flexibility with withdraw rate would increase this success rate. There are a lot of people willing to take this risk instead of working several extra years.
The Sensible Steward
Re: How to realistically FIRE?
That works too.willthrill81 wrote: ↑Thu Mar 14, 2019 10:49 amFritz from The Retirement Manifesto believes that the 'RE' should stand for 'recreational employment'.Dottie57 wrote: ↑Thu Mar 14, 2019 10:46 amThen the people with a blog, side business etc are FI, not FIRE.sjt wrote: ↑Thu Mar 14, 2019 9:37 am I think the FIRE movement is different for a lot of people. For a lot of FIRE bloggers and practitioners the "retirement" portion is quitting the 9-5 job. There is still the open door for part time work, side hustles, starting a business, et al - but the money in the bank allows for the Financial Independence to pursue this - and still have basic needs met.
Also, FIRE bloggers don't guarantee that 4% is successful, and advocate flexibility in your spending in the event of poor markets.
However, looking at Firecalc with a spend of $40k and a investment of $1M at the start, Making it 30 years without running out of money is just about 95%. However, a better number is the average at the end of $1.8M after 30 years - this is also inflation adjusted. So even withdrawing 4% each year, using a historical average you would end up not depleting but actually growing your stash over time.
However even if you put a 4% withdraw rate for 60 years there is an 83% success rate (this is with rigid withdraw of 4% each year) - some flexibility with withdraw rate would increase this success rate. There are a lot of people willing to take this risk instead of working several extra years.
Re: How to realistically FIRE?
Interestingly I find that most often the person with the $120K of expenses and $3 million to be much safer than the $60K and 1.5 Million.KlangFool wrote: ↑Thu Mar 14, 2019 9:35 amWanderingwheelz,Wanderingwheelz wrote: ↑Thu Mar 14, 2019 9:06 am Simple question.
Is 25x expenses/spending really a “safe” way to look at one’s ability or preparedness to retire? I realize it get safer to use such “rules of thumb” as you get older, but even for a 50 year old, is it still “within the margin of safety” to use the 25x figure? Two SSs will be there, but not using it in any calculations. Inheritances not calculated, either.
Portfolio is 60/40 using the 3 Fund Portfolio.
The answer is highly dependent on your annual expense.
For example, if your annual expense is 60K and you are around 50 years old, your number is 1.5 million. But, your social security benefit with 2 persons, is probably around 30K per year. So, your 1.5 million is 50X when you can withdraw social security. You have a big safety margin because of the social security cover 50% of the annual expense. Meanwhile, for someone with 120K of annual expense, the 25X number = 3 million may not be good enough.
KlangFool
The $60K expenses are most often not easily reduced whereas the $120K expenses typically have many more methods for reduction should the situation warrant it.
Re: How to realistically FIRE?
smitcat,smitcat wrote: ↑Thu Mar 14, 2019 12:16 pm
Interestingly I find that most often the person with the $120K of expenses and $3 million to be much safer than the $60K and 1.5 Million.
The $60K expenses are most often not easily reduced whereas the $120K expenses typically have many more methods for reduction should the situation warrant it.
I disagreed. As per my income peers, most of the 120K annual expense is associated with their mortgages. Hence, it cannot be reduced easily.
KlangFool
30% VWENX | 16% VFWAX/VTIAX | 14.5% VTSAX | 19.5% VBTLX | 10% VSIAX/VTMSX/VSMAX | 10% VSIGX| 30% Wellington 50% 3-funds 20% Mini-Larry
Re: How to realistically FIRE?
I agree.KlangFool wrote: ↑Thu Mar 14, 2019 9:35 amWanderingwheelz,Wanderingwheelz wrote: ↑Thu Mar 14, 2019 9:06 am Simple question.
Is 25x expenses/spending really a “safe” way to look at one’s ability or preparedness to retire? I realize it get safer to use such “rules of thumb” as you get older, but even for a 50 year old, is it still “within the margin of safety” to use the 25x figure? Two SSs will be there, but not using it in any calculations. Inheritances not calculated, either.
Portfolio is 60/40 using the 3 Fund Portfolio.
The answer is highly dependent on your annual expense.
For example, if your annual expense is 60K and you are around 50 years old, your number is 1.5 million. But, your social security benefit with 2 persons, is probably around 30K per year. So, your 1.5 million is 50X when you can withdraw social security. You have a big safety margin because of the social security cover 50% of the annual expense. Meanwhile, for someone with 120K of annual expense, the 25X number = 3 million may not be good enough.
KlangFool
Accurately projecting your expenses is very important. Multiplying by years in retirement will give you a target dollar amount. Having a safety margin is an important factor to me.
Last edited by Wiggums on Thu Mar 14, 2019 12:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"I started with nothing and I still have most of it left."
Re: How to realistically FIRE?
Renting or mortgage paid off which is typically what we are speaking about:KlangFool wrote: ↑Thu Mar 14, 2019 12:23 pmsmitcat,smitcat wrote: ↑Thu Mar 14, 2019 12:16 pm
Interestingly I find that most often the person with the $120K of expenses and $3 million to be much safer than the $60K and 1.5 Million.
The $60K expenses are most often not easily reduced whereas the $120K expenses typically have many more methods for reduction should the situation warrant it.
I disagreed. As per my income peers, most of the 120K annual expense is associated with their mortgages. Hence, it cannot be reduced easily.
KlangFool
- the person in the HCOL area and higher expenses has many choices.
- the person in the LCOL area and lower expenses has fewer choices.
Re: How to realistically FIRE?
I agree. We recently reached 25x our original projections. At the time we made those calculations, we were living on that amount and could see a couple of places to cut, but not much. Our lifestyle has recently expanded by quite a bit, for reasons related to work that we will cut as soon as we stop working. Nonetheless, we are making our new goal to be 25x the new lifestyle, which is 50x the life we plan to lead when we actually move on. It will leave us options, rather than being tied to adventure for the rest of our lives.smitcat wrote: ↑Thu Mar 14, 2019 12:16 pmInterestingly I find that most often the person with the $120K of expenses and $3 million to be much safer than the $60K and 1.5 Million.KlangFool wrote: ↑Thu Mar 14, 2019 9:35 amWanderingwheelz,Wanderingwheelz wrote: ↑Thu Mar 14, 2019 9:06 am Simple question.
Is 25x expenses/spending really a “safe” way to look at one’s ability or preparedness to retire? I realize it get safer to use such “rules of thumb” as you get older, but even for a 50 year old, is it still “within the margin of safety” to use the 25x figure? Two SSs will be there, but not using it in any calculations. Inheritances not calculated, either.
Portfolio is 60/40 using the 3 Fund Portfolio.
The answer is highly dependent on your annual expense.
For example, if your annual expense is 60K and you are around 50 years old, your number is 1.5 million. But, your social security benefit with 2 persons, is probably around 30K per year. So, your 1.5 million is 50X when you can withdraw social security. You have a big safety margin because of the social security cover 50% of the annual expense. Meanwhile, for someone with 120K of annual expense, the 25X number = 3 million may not be good enough.
KlangFool
The $60K expenses are most often not easily reduced whereas the $120K expenses typically have many more methods for reduction should the situation warrant it.
Re: How to realistically FIRE?
smitcat,smitcat wrote: ↑Thu Mar 14, 2019 12:26 pmRenting or mortgage paid off which is typically what we are speaking about:KlangFool wrote: ↑Thu Mar 14, 2019 12:23 pmsmitcat,smitcat wrote: ↑Thu Mar 14, 2019 12:16 pm
Interestingly I find that most often the person with the $120K of expenses and $3 million to be much safer than the $60K and 1.5 Million.
The $60K expenses are most often not easily reduced whereas the $120K expenses typically have many more methods for reduction should the situation warrant it.
I disagreed. As per my income peers, most of the 120K annual expense is associated with their mortgages. Hence, it cannot be reduced easily.
KlangFool
- the person in the HCOL area and higher expenses has many choices.
- the person in the LCOL area and lower expenses has fewer choices.
<<- the person in the HCOL area and higher expenses has many choices.>>
I disagreed. Once a person overspends on a house and the person is stuck on a big expensive mortgage, the choice is gone. By the way, in my area, the house has not recovered to the 2004/2005 level. So, counting on the house appreciation is not possible either.
KlangFool
30% VWENX | 16% VFWAX/VTIAX | 14.5% VTSAX | 19.5% VBTLX | 10% VSIAX/VTMSX/VSMAX | 10% VSIGX| 30% Wellington 50% 3-funds 20% Mini-Larry
Re: How to realistically FIRE?
FWIW, I'm aiming to FIRE in 5-7 years around age 50. The goal is 35x expenses saved, paid off house, and a pension that covers 80% of expenses starting at age 55. This includes money for modest travel and new vehicles every 5 years (I usually keep cars for 10). I'm probably overdoing it, but my kids will still be in secondary school so I need a cushion.
Last edited by alpenglow on Thu Mar 14, 2019 12:37 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Re: How to realistically FIRE?
You cannot use the SWR for FIRE as it's set to run out of money in 30 years, you need to use the PWR (perpetual withdrawal rate, i.e. the amount you can safely withdrawal and never run out of money). Also, different portfolios have different SWR/PWR's. There is no set percentage that is safe or perpetual for every portfolio. Too many people wrongly assume that the commonly touted SWR works for all portfolios... it doesn't. Also, counter-intuitively the more conservative a portfolio generally the higher the SWR and PWR.
See here for more info: https://portfoliocharts.com/2016/12/09/ ... etirement/
See here for more info: https://portfoliocharts.com/2016/12/09/ ... etirement/
Re: How to realistically FIRE?
alpenglow,alpenglow wrote: ↑Thu Mar 14, 2019 12:34 pm FWIW, I'm aiming to FIRE in 5-7 years around age 50. The goal is 35x expenses saved, paid off house, and a pension that covers 80% of expenses starting at age 55. This includes money for modest travel and new vehicles every 5 years (I usually keep cars for 10). I'm probably overdoing it, but my kids will still be in secondary school so I need a cushion.
Do you plan to pay for your kid's college education after you retire?
KlangFool
30% VWENX | 16% VFWAX/VTIAX | 14.5% VTSAX | 19.5% VBTLX | 10% VSIAX/VTMSX/VSMAX | 10% VSIGX| 30% Wellington 50% 3-funds 20% Mini-Larry
Re: How to realistically FIRE?
I'm in a state (NY) with excellent state schools and the excelsior scholarship program, so we will likely be able to pay for their college. I'm willing to delay FIRE depending on their needs and abilities.KlangFool wrote: ↑Thu Mar 14, 2019 12:42 pmalpenglow,alpenglow wrote: ↑Thu Mar 14, 2019 12:34 pm FWIW, I'm aiming to FIRE in 5-7 years around age 50. The goal is 35x expenses saved, paid off house, and a pension that covers 80% of expenses starting at age 55. This includes money for modest travel and new vehicles every 5 years (I usually keep cars for 10). I'm probably overdoing it, but my kids will still be in secondary school so I need a cushion.
Do you plan to pay for your kid's college education after you retire?
KlangFool
Re: How to realistically FIRE?
alpenglow,alpenglow wrote: ↑Thu Mar 14, 2019 12:45 pmI'm in a state (NY) with excellent state schools and the excelsior scholarship program, so we will likely be able to pay for their college. I'm willing to delay FIRE depending on their needs and abilities.KlangFool wrote: ↑Thu Mar 14, 2019 12:42 pmalpenglow,alpenglow wrote: ↑Thu Mar 14, 2019 12:34 pm FWIW, I'm aiming to FIRE in 5-7 years around age 50. The goal is 35x expenses saved, paid off house, and a pension that covers 80% of expenses starting at age 55. This includes money for modest travel and new vehicles every 5 years (I usually keep cars for 10). I'm probably overdoing it, but my kids will still be in secondary school so I need a cushion.
Do you plan to pay for your kid's college education after you retire?
KlangFool
Okay. I just want to understand your complete picture. Thanks.
KlangFool
30% VWENX | 16% VFWAX/VTIAX | 14.5% VTSAX | 19.5% VBTLX | 10% VSIAX/VTMSX/VSMAX | 10% VSIGX| 30% Wellington 50% 3-funds 20% Mini-Larry
Re: How to realistically FIRE?
KlangFool wrote: ↑Thu Mar 14, 2019 12:32 pmsmitcat,smitcat wrote: ↑Thu Mar 14, 2019 12:26 pmRenting or mortgage paid off which is typically what we are speaking about:KlangFool wrote: ↑Thu Mar 14, 2019 12:23 pmsmitcat,smitcat wrote: ↑Thu Mar 14, 2019 12:16 pm
Interestingly I find that most often the person with the $120K of expenses and $3 million to be much safer than the $60K and 1.5 Million.
The $60K expenses are most often not easily reduced whereas the $120K expenses typically have many more methods for reduction should the situation warrant it.
I disagreed. As per my income peers, most of the 120K annual expense is associated with their mortgages. Hence, it cannot be reduced easily.
KlangFool
- the person in the HCOL area and higher expenses has many choices.
- the person in the LCOL area and lower expenses has fewer choices.
<<- the person in the HCOL area and higher expenses has many choices.>>
I disagreed. Once a person overspends on a house and the person is stuck on a big expensive mortgage, the choice is gone. By the way, in my area, the house has not recovered to the 2004/2005 level. So, counting on the house appreciation is not possible either.
KlangFool
You have now limited the discussion of FIRE to only home owners.
- you have arbitrarily assigned all overspending to mortgage costs ….if you take that very narrow view you would be correct.
- most folks at any income level have not saved enough for retirement, that data is clear.
- on this thread we are speaking about the minor subset of those that have saved.
The world is much larger than your immediate area and peers.
Re: How to realistically FIRE?
We have overdone it as well but we have much freedom in our jobs and we like what we do.alpenglow wrote: ↑Thu Mar 14, 2019 12:34 pm FWIW, I'm aiming to FIRE in 5-7 years around age 50. The goal is 35x expenses saved, paid off house, and a pension that covers 80% of expenses starting at age 55. This includes money for modest travel and new vehicles every 5 years (I usually keep cars for 10). I'm probably overdoing it, but my kids will still be in secondary school so I need a cushion.
A bonus reason for waiting a bit longer is that we can save at a rate that is 15-20 times faster than our daughter.
Seems easy to save a bit for her future since each month we save is about 1.5 years of what she is able to save.
Re: How to realistically FIRE?
Sure. With everything in life, you need to be flexible. Especially when it comes to FIRE!KlangFool wrote: ↑Thu Mar 14, 2019 12:47 pmalpenglow,alpenglow wrote: ↑Thu Mar 14, 2019 12:45 pmI'm in a state (NY) with excellent state schools and the excelsior scholarship program, so we will likely be able to pay for their college. I'm willing to delay FIRE depending on their needs and abilities.KlangFool wrote: ↑Thu Mar 14, 2019 12:42 pmalpenglow,alpenglow wrote: ↑Thu Mar 14, 2019 12:34 pm FWIW, I'm aiming to FIRE in 5-7 years around age 50. The goal is 35x expenses saved, paid off house, and a pension that covers 80% of expenses starting at age 55. This includes money for modest travel and new vehicles every 5 years (I usually keep cars for 10). I'm probably overdoing it, but my kids will still be in secondary school so I need a cushion.
Do you plan to pay for your kid's college education after you retire?
KlangFool
Okay. I just want to understand your complete picture. Thanks.
KlangFool
Re: How to realistically FIRE?
smitcat,smitcat wrote: ↑Thu Mar 14, 2019 12:54 pmKlangFool wrote: ↑Thu Mar 14, 2019 12:32 pmsmitcat,smitcat wrote: ↑Thu Mar 14, 2019 12:26 pmRenting or mortgage paid off which is typically what we are speaking about:KlangFool wrote: ↑Thu Mar 14, 2019 12:23 pmsmitcat,smitcat wrote: ↑Thu Mar 14, 2019 12:16 pm
Interestingly I find that most often the person with the $120K of expenses and $3 million to be much safer than the $60K and 1.5 Million.
The $60K expenses are most often not easily reduced whereas the $120K expenses typically have many more methods for reduction should the situation warrant it.
I disagreed. As per my income peers, most of the 120K annual expense is associated with their mortgages. Hence, it cannot be reduced easily.
KlangFool
- the person in the HCOL area and higher expenses has many choices.
- the person in the LCOL area and lower expenses has fewer choices.
<<- the person in the HCOL area and higher expenses has many choices.>>
I disagreed. Once a person overspends on a house and the person is stuck on a big expensive mortgage, the choice is gone. By the way, in my area, the house has not recovered to the 2004/2005 level. So, counting on the house appreciation is not possible either.
KlangFool
You have now limited the discussion of FIRE to only home owners.
- you have arbitrarily assigned all overspending to mortgage costs ….if you take that very narrow view you would be correct.
- most folks at any income level have not saved enough for retirement, that data is clear.
- on this thread we are speaking about the minor subset of those that have saved.
The world is much larger than your immediate area and peers.
Show me some real example and observation of folks spending 120K per year that is not homeowners. Where do they spend their money? As per my observations across my friends and families, it is always about the house.
KlangFool
30% VWENX | 16% VFWAX/VTIAX | 14.5% VTSAX | 19.5% VBTLX | 10% VSIAX/VTMSX/VSMAX | 10% VSIGX| 30% Wellington 50% 3-funds 20% Mini-Larry
Re: How to realistically FIRE?
Agreed. This is a thread about "realistic" retirement on Bogleheads. Most bogleheads are not gong into retirement with a big mortgage drag on their spending. In fact, they are so cautious that they seem to be worrying about whether 47X expenses is enough!smitcat wrote: ↑Thu Mar 14, 2019 12:26 pmRenting or mortgage paid off which is typically what we are speaking about:KlangFool wrote: ↑Thu Mar 14, 2019 12:23 pmsmitcat,smitcat wrote: ↑Thu Mar 14, 2019 12:16 pm
Interestingly I find that most often the person with the $120K of expenses and $3 million to be much safer than the $60K and 1.5 Million.
The $60K expenses are most often not easily reduced whereas the $120K expenses typically have many more methods for reduction should the situation warrant it.
I disagreed. As per my income peers, most of the 120K annual expense is associated with their mortgages. Hence, it cannot be reduced easily.
KlangFool
- the person in the HCOL area and higher expenses has many choices.
- the person in the LCOL area and lower expenses has fewer choices.
The idea that the 120k expense crowd has a big mortgage which reduces their spending flexibility in retirement is a red herring, despite what Klangfool's peers may or may not be doing.
120K is about our expense-level and our mortgage is paid off. Otherwise we wouldn't even think about retirement.
Re: How to realistically FIRE?
If you're ignoring SS, then having lower expenses means you're safer.smitcat wrote: ↑Thu Mar 14, 2019 12:16 pmInterestingly I find that most often the person with the $120K of expenses and $3 million to be much safer than the $60K and 1.5 Million.KlangFool wrote: ↑Thu Mar 14, 2019 9:35 amWanderingwheelz,Wanderingwheelz wrote: ↑Thu Mar 14, 2019 9:06 am Simple question.
Is 25x expenses/spending really a “safe” way to look at one’s ability or preparedness to retire? I realize it get safer to use such “rules of thumb” as you get older, but even for a 50 year old, is it still “within the margin of safety” to use the 25x figure? Two SSs will be there, but not using it in any calculations. Inheritances not calculated, either.
Portfolio is 60/40 using the 3 Fund Portfolio.
The answer is highly dependent on your annual expense.
For example, if your annual expense is 60K and you are around 50 years old, your number is 1.5 million. But, your social security benefit with 2 persons, is probably around 30K per year. So, your 1.5 million is 50X when you can withdraw social security. You have a big safety margin because of the social security cover 50% of the annual expense. Meanwhile, for someone with 120K of annual expense, the 25X number = 3 million may not be good enough.
KlangFool
The $60K expenses are most often not easily reduced whereas the $120K expenses typically have many more methods for reduction should the situation warrant it.
"The best tools available to us are shovels, not scalpels. Don't get carried away." - vanBogle59
- Clever_Username
- Posts: 1915
- Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2012 12:24 am
- Location: Southern California
Re: How to realistically FIRE?
SWR isn't set to run out of money in 30 years except in extremely unlikely circumstances. Most of the time, the inflation-adjusted principal is higher at the end.pward wrote: ↑Thu Mar 14, 2019 12:35 pm You cannot use the SWR for FIRE as it's set to run out of money in 30 years, you need to use the PWR (perpetual withdrawal rate, i.e. the amount you can safely withdrawal and never run out of money). Also, different portfolios have different SWR/PWR's. There is no set percentage that is safe or perpetual for every portfolio. Too many people wrongly assume that the commonly touted SWR works for all portfolios... it doesn't. Also, counter-intuitively the more conservative a portfolio generally the higher the SWR and PWR.
See here for more info: https://portfoliocharts.com/2016/12/09/ ... etirement/
"What was true then is true now. Have a plan. Stick to it." -- XXXX, _Layer Cake_ |
|
I survived my first downturn and all I got was this signature line.
Re: How to realistically FIRE?
Just curious is that 35x the residual amount of expenses beyond your pension, or 35x of total expenses and Pension on top of that?alpenglow wrote: ↑Thu Mar 14, 2019 12:34 pm FWIW, I'm aiming to FIRE in 5-7 years around age 50. The goal is 35x expenses saved, paid off house, and a pension that covers 80% of expenses starting at age 55. This includes money for modest travel and new vehicles every 5 years (I usually keep cars for 10). I'm probably overdoing it, but my kids will still be in secondary school so I need a cushion.
Once in a while you get shown the light, in the strangest of places if you look at it right.