Simba's backtesting spreadsheet [a Bogleheads community project]

Discuss all general (i.e. non-personal) investing questions and issues, investing news, and theory.
User avatar
gummy
Posts: 340
Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2007 2:34 pm
Location: Burlington, Ontari-ari-ari-O
Contact:

Post by gummy »

Mamma mia!
Simba, you is so fast!
I wuz still workin' on rev5j when you done finished rev5k with the probability stuff included. :D

About Ito, the lognormal distribution of prices at time T (starting with price Po) is:
Image
I just stuck in the parameters r, s and Po, using your data.
jms969
Posts: 156
Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 4:56 pm
Location: South Central Wisconsin

Post by jms969 »

gummy wrote:Mamma mia!
Simba, you is so fast!
I wuz still workin' on rev5j when you done finished rev5k with the probability stuff included. :D

About Ito, the lognormal distribution of prices at time T (starting with price Po) is:
Image
I just stuck in the parameters r, s and Po, using your data.
WOW I do love having a PhD in mathmatics on the board. My little engineering background just does not hold a candle to you :lol:
I want to die peacefully in my sleep like my grandfather, not screaming like the passengers in his car.
jms969
Posts: 156
Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 4:56 pm
Location: South Central Wisconsin

Re: updated with gummy's changes

Post by jms969 »

simba wrote:jms - I updated the spreadsheet with gummy's changes.

Latest version rev5k can be downloaded here

Honestly I can't say I understand everything he did there. I am still reading about Ito's calculus and sortino ratio.
Yeah Gummy gets out ahead of me pretty quickly as well (but that is very good!!!). But what an amazing group of people here!!! I learn more here than I ever dreamed.


The following site is Aswath Damodaran's, Professor of Finance and David Margolis Teaching Fellow at the Stern School of Business at New York University. He has an amazing array of spreadsheets and business data that is available for your use. It is free and regularly updated.

Enjoy...

http://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/New_Home_Page/

Peace,

JMS
I want to die peacefully in my sleep like my grandfather, not screaming like the passengers in his car.
User avatar
gummy
Posts: 340
Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2007 2:34 pm
Location: Burlington, Ontari-ari-ari-O
Contact:

Post by gummy »

jms969:
Thanks for the link to all them thar spreadsheets.
I reckon I gotta steal some things to add to this collection:**
http://www.gummy-stuff.org/stock-charts.htm

** Thievery is my favourite hobby ... :lol:
jms969
Posts: 156
Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 4:56 pm
Location: South Central Wisconsin

Post by jms969 »

gummy wrote:jms969:
Thanks for the link to all them thar spreadsheets.
I reckon I gotta steal some things to add to this collection:**
http://www.gummy-stuff.org/stock-charts.htm

** Thievery is my favourite hobby ... :lol:
Great collection of charts!!!

We are one sick bunch :lol:
I want to die peacefully in my sleep like my grandfather, not screaming like the passengers in his car.
edge
Posts: 3833
Joined: Mon Feb 19, 2007 6:44 pm
Location: NY

I think this illustrates..

Post by edge »

I think the past few exchanges illustrate the need for a collaborative tool to help streamline updates and availability - google spreadsheets could work here. If any more assistance is required to understand how to set this up I could volunteer to help.

In any case, the changes are pretty cool.
jms969
Posts: 156
Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 4:56 pm
Location: South Central Wisconsin

Re: I think this illustrates..

Post by jms969 »

edge wrote:I think the past few exchanges illustrate the need for a collaborative tool to help streamline updates and availability - google spreadsheets could work here. If any more assistance is required to understand how to set this up I could volunteer to help.

In any case, the changes are pretty cool.
Agreed!!!

But one person, Simba, (or small committee) still needs ultimate say over what is and is not accepted for the release version... We also need to reduce the load on Simba...

...and we of course need to be able to suck the release version off of google ss into excel.
Last edited by jms969 on Tue May 29, 2007 4:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.
I want to die peacefully in my sleep like my grandfather, not screaming like the passengers in his car.
User avatar
gummy
Posts: 340
Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2007 2:34 pm
Location: Burlington, Ontari-ari-ari-O
Contact:

Post by gummy »

But one person, Simba, (or small committee) still needs ultimate say over what is and is not accepted for the release version...
Agreed! Now if we can only reduce the pressure (and sweat) on Simba.

P.S.
The google spreadsheets can't handle all of Excel's functionality ... but it's cheeep, eh?

If Simba agrees, I can collect revisions, stick them on my website then PM Simba so he can check them out and decide it they're acceptable.
norm
Posts: 594
Joined: Mon Feb 19, 2007 6:10 pm

Post by norm »

gummy wrote:
After I entered the % of my allocations nothing appeared on the graphs. Am I missing a step?
Do your allocations add to 100%?

Yes they do. In addition on Row 45 under Total it shows Error and under CAGR it shows #VALUE!.
edge
Posts: 3833
Joined: Mon Feb 19, 2007 6:44 pm
Location: NY

Post by edge »

gummy wrote:
But one person, Simba, (or small committee) still needs ultimate say over what is and is not accepted for the release version...
Agreed! Now if we can only reduce the pressure (and sweat) on Simba.

P.S.
The google spreadsheets can't handle all of Excel's functionality ... but it's cheeep, eh?

If Simba agrees, I can collect revisions, stick them on my website then PM Simba so he can check them out and decide it they're acceptable.
The permissions/sharing policy available in the Google SS should support the kind of collaboration that JMS was talking about. Gummy's point needs addressing - I think the lack of functionality may have more to do with the fact that the product is very new and definitely still beta. The graphing capability is still very beta in terms of features.

Which critical features are missing (Gummy)?
User avatar
SoonerSunDevil
Posts: 2000
Joined: Mon Feb 19, 2007 9:32 pm
Location: The desert

Gummy/Simba

Post by SoonerSunDevil »

Gummy/Simba,

Could either of you explain what the graph showing the "Probability of achieving less than 1000$P in 15 years" means?

I'm sorry that my mathematical abilities are limited; I only had Calculus I and II during college :D

Thanks,

John
User avatar
Topic Author
simba
Posts: 540
Joined: Mon Feb 19, 2007 6:47 pm

Spreadsheet updated to include Sortino Ratio

Post by simba »

Thanks to Gummy - I updated the spreadsheet to calculate Sortino ratio.

The formula I used is

=((AVERAGE(AB5:AB39))-(AVERAGE(Data_72_06!$V$5:$V$39)))/STDEV(IF(AB5:AB39<AVERAGE(Data_72_06!$V$5:$V$39),AB5:AB39))

Need to enter that formula with Ctrl-Shift-enter.

Latest version rev5m can be downloaded here
sterjs
Posts: 300
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2007 2:22 am

Post by sterjs »

I posted a link to the sheet on another messageboard and one poster thinks that the sheet's calculation of Sharpe Ratios is off:

"yea the sharpe ratio calculations don't take compounding into effect

they use Average(portfolio returns)-Average(tbill returns) to get the excess returns. it should be subtracting the tbill return from the portfolio return in each time period and then calculating the compound returns.

their sharpe ratios are historical underestimates in this case (sheets SP-72-06 and SP-85-06). "
norm
Posts: 594
Joined: Mon Feb 19, 2007 6:10 pm

Post by norm »

Simba,

After I entered the % of my allocations nothing appeared on the graphs. Am I missing a step? My total allocation comes to 100%
User avatar
gummy
Posts: 340
Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2007 2:34 pm
Location: Burlington, Ontari-ari-ari-O
Contact:

Post by gummy »

Could either of you explain what the graph showing the "Probability of achieving less than 1000$P in 15 years" means?
The magic formula I gave above, namely
Image
uses the historical mean return r and standard deviation s and the initial portfolio value Po.

The spreadsheet calculates the probability (based upon these parameters) that, in T years, your portfolio will be less than P.
Actually, the horizontal axis is in units of $1K so, for the example shown in the left chart,
there's a 50% probability that your portfolio will be less than $100K in T = 15 years.

Change the allocation and/or the time and get different probabilities.
That's assuming you believe in Ito's magic equation. :)
After I entered the % of my allocations nothing appeared on the graphs. Am I missing a step? My total allocation comes to 100%
To relieve Simba I'll take a try at explaining. Just email the "faulty" spreadsheet to:
pjponzo@golden.net
the sharpe ratio calculations don't take compounding into effect ... they use Average(portfolio returns)-Average(tbill returns) to get the excess returns. it should be
That's the "standard" definition. Indeed, the numerator is the "Expected" excess which is the same as the Average excess which is the same as the difference in the two Averages.
Eric White
Posts: 54
Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 10:09 am

Error in Returns_85_06 asset allocation links; change plans

Post by Eric White »

Simba:

ERROR FOR 85-06 CALCULATIONS:

Cell Z3 on sheet Returns_85_06 uses the following formula:
=Portfolio!$K$28

Cell AA3 on sheet Returns_85_06 uses the following formula:
=Portfolio!$K$30

It looks like Cell AA3 needs to use the formula =Portfolio!$K$29, and the remaining cells in the row need new transposed links.

ERROR CHECKING REQUEST
Also, if you can eliminate this error check in the calculations and instead use simple 100% summary visual sanity checks, that reduces rework for each rev to enable efficient frontier Excel Solver calculations. I have redone the Solver work twice now and it's been obsoleted a third time. I will not be supporting efficient frontier additions moving forward if we can't find a solution that will be incorporated or planned with compatibility in mind.

CHANGE PLANNING
Although I'm Pi Tau Sigma and Tau Beta Pi and enjoy mathematical acrobatics, simplicity is our friend until the basic portfolio options and datasets get nailed down. It will let us focus on data quality and basic calculation integrity. I think after the portfolio request additions and resulting structures settle down we should initiate discussions (and polls!) around metrics that are most useful to Diehards overall. I'm a little worried that as we add metrics into the tool, we may start to lose the forest for the trees.

Of course, I'm a guilty party in this process as well, shooting for the efficient frontier calcs too early :| Portfolio Process Capability (Cp), Kurtosis, Monte Carlo analysis, discrete event simulations, and system dynamics models should all have their day in the sun, just maybe not yet (insert your "horse before the cart" jokes here).

Thanks for all the hard work Simba! This is the foundation for expansion work down the road.

Cheers,
Eric
Eric White
Posts: 54
Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 10:09 am

Cost and Portfolio dataset addition requests

Post by Eric White »

Do fellow Diehards feel it would be useful to add costs for each investment choice (absolute return - cost - inflation = real investor return) and include them in calculations? Sorry if it's already in there...

In addition, does anyone have datasets we can add for the following asset subclasses:

High Priority:
- Stable value/fixed (e.g. GICs, etc. offered via insurance to 401ks/403bs)
- Currencies? (to separate currency effect from International, European, Pacific, and EM returns; similar to inflation for separating investor returns)

Medium Prioriy:
- Int SV (no current Vanguard availability; ETF availability)
- EM SV (no current Vanguard availability; future ETF availability)
- Int REIT (no current Vanguard availability; mutual fund & ETF availability; new asset subclass may not have sufficient data)

Low Prioriy:
- Private Equity (no current Vanguard availability; future ETF availability?)
- International Bonds (no current Vanguard availability; mutual funds available)
- EM Bonds (no current Vanguard availability; mutual funds available)

Cheers,
Eric
BornInBoston
Posts: 2
Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 8:23 am

Rebalancing

Post by BornInBoston »

Amazing job, and superb collaberative work on this spreadsheet.

Question: is there any rebalancing involved in these calculations? Can't seem to find a reference to rebalancing. Sorry if I missed it. Lee
User avatar
Cb
Posts: 275
Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 11:39 pm

Re: Cost and Portfolio dataset addition requests

Post by Cb »

Eric White wrote:Do fellow Diehards feel it would be useful to add costs for each investment choice (absolute return - cost - inflation = real investor return) and include them in calculations? Sorry if it's already in there...
Eric
I agree with you wrt to expene ratios, Eric. At present, in many (most?) of the asset classes, there is a bit of both. The 1972 - 199x returns are most often from MSCII-Barra or CRSP or another source that does NOT include typical fund ER's, and the returns used after the launh of the corresponding Vanguard fund in 199x - 2006 DO include the fund's ER.

I think it would be preferable to subtract the Vanguard funds's Investor Class ER from the earlier returns of the corresponding raw index also.

My preference would be to continue using nominal returns however, rather than subtracting one inflation index or another.

Cb
User avatar
gummy
Posts: 340
Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2007 2:34 pm
Location: Burlington, Ontari-ari-ari-O
Contact:

Post by gummy »

Question: is there any rebalancing involved in these calculations?
Yup! Annual rebalancing to maintain the prescribed allocations.
edge
Posts: 3833
Joined: Mon Feb 19, 2007 6:44 pm
Location: NY

Lots of errors in the correlation

Post by edge »

Maybe I am missing something but it seems that nearly every calcuation of correlation is using a wrong column or all the columns in many of the correlation calcutaions are wrong in 5m.
User avatar
gummy
Posts: 340
Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2007 2:34 pm
Location: Burlington, Ontari-ari-ari-O
Contact:

Post by gummy »

The latest-and-greatest is available here:
http://www.gummy-stuff.org/Simba.htm

Simba has made a number of changes.
Check it out.
edge
Posts: 3833
Joined: Mon Feb 19, 2007 6:44 pm
Location: NY

Am I crazy?

Post by edge »

I think the correlation numbers are wrong in this one too :p (?)
User avatar
Topic Author
simba
Posts: 540
Joined: Mon Feb 19, 2007 6:47 pm

Re: Am I crazy?

Post by simba »

edge wrote:I think the correlation numbers are wrong in this one too :p (?)
edge - I sent a PM to gummy this morning to update the SS on his website.
The latest version rev5p should be okay.

Regards,
Simba
johnb
Posts: 282
Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2007 12:11 pm

Post by johnb »

Any chance of an unprotected version? I'm not able to change the blue cells on the newest version of the file. :( I'm on a Mac.
User avatar
gummy
Posts: 340
Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2007 2:34 pm
Location: Burlington, Ontari-ari-ari-O
Contact:

Post by gummy »

Simba's rev5p is now here:
http://www.gummy-stuff.org/Excel/Simba-Backtest.xls

The "portfolio" sheet is unprotected. :D
johnb
Posts: 282
Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2007 12:11 pm

Post by johnb »

Thanks Gummy!
edge
Posts: 3833
Joined: Mon Feb 19, 2007 6:44 pm
Location: NY

Data source for EM?

Post by edge »

I think the data source for EM has a developed market index listed - this does not seem correct.
User avatar
Topic Author
simba
Posts: 540
Joined: Mon Feb 19, 2007 6:47 pm

Re: Data source for EM?

Post by simba »

edge wrote:I think the data source for EM has a developed market index listed - this does not seem correct.
edge - thanks for pointing it out but that's just a typo error.

The EM returns for the duration 1972-87 were compiled by Robert T and I listed the source of the returns (These are not true EM returns either, they are a combination of 50% Intl Value & 50% Intl Small combination, check the IFA website for more info).

MSCI EM returns are available from 1987 and VG EM returns are available from 1995.

Regards,
Simba
edge
Posts: 3833
Joined: Mon Feb 19, 2007 6:44 pm
Location: NY

Yup

Post by edge »

Simba,

Ya, I checked it myself and the actual data seemed fine :)
User avatar
gbs
Wiki Admin
Posts: 557
Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 11:41 am

Un-rebalanced returns

Post by gbs »

Simba,

I think it will be interesting to add the results for the un-rebalanced portfolio as well.

I did some testing on my own and in most cases for an all stock portfolio the returns as well as stdev go up.

gbs
User avatar
fundtalker123
Posts: 901
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 3:18 am

Post by fundtalker123 »

Ok, math-stat wizzes, I've got a question:

Suppose you've got this marvelous spreadsheet going and you're compulsively diddling around your asset allocation (heaven forbid, maybe you're even started messin' with SCV, EM, REITS, and Commodities). After diddling for 5 hours you get your Std. Dev. to PLUMMET from 13.8% to 12.8% and, at the same time, your CAGR SKYROCKETS from 10.8% to 11%!

How do you judge whether this change is statistically significant? It seems like some statistical test is in order. If there's a 55%/45% chance that my new portfolio is better/worse than my old one, I probably wouldn't bother making a change. But if it's 80%/20%, that might get me thinkin'. Any way to estimate this?
BornInBoston
Posts: 2
Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 8:23 am

Error in SS?

Post by BornInBoston »

When I try to put 100% in TSM (first item in asset list) I get error messages. Why won't the SS let me do this? Other combinations work fine, by the way.
User avatar
Topic Author
simba
Posts: 540
Joined: Mon Feb 19, 2007 6:47 pm

Re: Un-rebalanced returns

Post by simba »

gbs wrote:Simba,

I think it will be interesting to add the results for the un-rebalanced portfolio as well.

I did some testing on my own and in most cases for an all stock portfolio the returns as well as stdev go up.

gbs
gbs - Thanks for the suggestion

The latest version rev6a can be downloaded here.

Some additions include (Thanks Gummy. Your help is very much appreciated).
- One can now compare 5 different portfolios
- Chart shows only the selected time periods
- SS shows returns for both rebalanced & un-rebalanced portfolios.

Regards,
Simba
User avatar
gbs
Wiki Admin
Posts: 557
Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 11:41 am

Post by gbs »

Thanks Simba!

gbs
User avatar
fundtalker123
Posts: 901
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 3:18 am

Post by fundtalker123 »

Countour plots of sharpe ratio and compound annual return calculated from the 35 yr data, comparing various mixes of bonds and stocks, with various international, REIT, small cap value tilts, or with slice-dice are posted here:

http://www.gummy-stuff.org/FundTalker.htm

(the plots were done in Matlab and I don't know how to incorporate that in the Excel spreadsheet)
edge
Posts: 3833
Joined: Mon Feb 19, 2007 6:44 pm
Location: NY

Some bugs

Post by edge »

Hi,

I think some of the "real" returns are wrong, looks like one of the columns used in the equation are wrong.

It would be better if the inflation column was $'ed so the equation could just be copied/pasted.

A minor issue, one of the graph legend has "rebalanced" portfolio when it should be "unrebalanced"

Edited:

P2 P3 P4 P5 in the portfolio comparision section

Real returns are the same as nominal returns.
Last edited by edge on Thu Jun 07, 2007 9:59 am, edited 1 time in total.
sterjs
Posts: 300
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2007 2:22 am

Post by sterjs »

Interesting Result: Commodities don't improve Sharpe Ratios much for diversified portfolios, but they improve Sortino Ratios substantially.

I also messed around with the allocations and produced a portfolio that never had a losing year:

65% ST Treasuries
15% Commodities
10% U.S. Small Value
05% EAFE Value
05% Emerging Markets

CAGR 10.01%
Std. Dev. 4.62%
Sharpe 0.87
Sortino 2.97

P.S. The Intl Value looks strange to me... was there really only a .27% Value premium in EAFE from 72-2006?
Last edited by sterjs on Thu Jun 07, 2007 11:01 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Topic Author
simba
Posts: 540
Joined: Mon Feb 19, 2007 6:47 pm

Re: Some bugs

Post by simba »

edge wrote:Hi,

I think some of the "real" returns are wrong, looks like one of the columns used in the equation are wrong.

It would be better if the inflation column was $'ed so the equation could just be copied/pasted.

A minor issue, one of the graph legend has "rebalanced" portfolio when it should be "unrebalanced"

Edited:

P2 P3 P4 P5 in the portfolio comparision section

Real returns are the same as nominal returns.
Edge - Thanks for the correction. The latest version rev6b can be downloaded here
User avatar
Topic Author
simba
Posts: 540
Joined: Mon Feb 19, 2007 6:47 pm

Post by simba »

sterjs wrote:Interesting Result: Commodities don't improve Sharpe Ratios much for diversified portfolios, but they improve Sortino Ratios substantially.

I also messed around with the allocations and produced a portfolio that never had a losing year:

65% ST Treasuries
15% Commodities
10% U.S. Small Value
05% EAFE Value
05% Emerging Markets

CAGR 10.01%
Std. Dev. 4.62%
Sharpe 0.87
Sortino 2.97

P.S. The Intl Value looks strange to me... was there really only a .27% Value premium in EAFE from 72-2006?
sterjis,

I went back and verified the data for Intl Value and looked up VG's SEC filing. The data matched but Vanguard/Trustees' Equity Fund-International Portfolio became VG Intl Value (VTRIX) in 1997 so I went back and used the MSCI EAFE Value from 1975-1996 and VTRIX from 1997-2006 (instead of 1984-2006 that I was using earlier) now the value premium shows upto about 2% which is about the same for US Mkt as well.

Updated revision rev6c can be downloaded here

Regards,
Simba
jms969
Posts: 156
Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 4:56 pm
Location: South Central Wisconsin

Post by jms969 »

Here is a nice link to some excellent excel add-ins.

I am trying to apply the linear programming example to your spreadsheet to be able to change constraints and have it find an optimal solution. Solver only goes so far :)

http://www.me.utexas.edu/~jensen/ORMM/f ... index.html

PS. Gummy you should like these :D
I want to die peacefully in my sleep like my grandfather, not screaming like the passengers in his car.
User avatar
gummy
Posts: 340
Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2007 2:34 pm
Location: Burlington, Ontari-ari-ari-O
Contact:

Post by gummy »

Alas, I can never seem to run Simba's spreadsheets after downloading. :(

Hmm ... gotta take a look at them add-ins. :D
sterjs
Posts: 300
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2007 2:22 am

Post by sterjs »

1985*-2006 Mid Cap Value, Growth

MC Value
0.32
0.18
-0.02
0.25
0.23
-0.16
0.38
0.22
0.16
-0.02
0.35
0.2
0.34
0.05
0.02
0.19
0.02
-0.1
0.38
0.24
0.13
0.2

MC Growth
0.32
0.18
0.03
0.13
0.32
-0.05
0.47
0.09
0.11
-0.02
0.34
0.18
0.23
0.18
0.51
-0.12
-0.2
-0.27
0.43
0.16
0.12
0.11

* MC Blend returns were used for 1985.

Source 1

Source 2
User avatar
Topic Author
simba
Posts: 540
Joined: Mon Feb 19, 2007 6:47 pm

SS updated with Midcap growth & Midcap value

Post by simba »

Latest version rev6d can be downloaded here.

This includes Mid-Cap growth & Mid-Cap Value.
Peppe
Posts: 117
Joined: Mon Apr 16, 2007 1:26 pm

Post by Peppe »

Can you add VG extended market or other S&P completion type index? My 401k doesn't have total stock market, but has S&P 500 and the Russell small cap completion index. I used mid cap blend in place of it, but the completion index is more volatile than the VG mid cap.

Thanks for all your hard work this spreadsheet is fun to tinker with and is very helpful.
User avatar
Topic Author
simba
Posts: 540
Joined: Mon Feb 19, 2007 6:47 pm

Post by simba »

Peppe wrote:Can you add VG extended market or other S&P completion type index? My 401k doesn't have total stock market, but has S&P 500 and the Russell small cap completion index. I used mid cap blend in place of it, but the completion index is more volatile than the VG mid cap.

Thanks for all your hard work this spreadsheet is fun to tinker with and is very helpful.
Peppe,

I added VG extended Mkt returns to the spreadsheet. Latest version rev6e can be downloaded here

Regards,
Simba
User avatar
Zapped
Posts: 216
Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 3:00 pm
Location: Austin, TX

Post by Zapped »

Has anyone sucessfully loaded the spreadsheet in OpenOffice? I'm using release 2.0.2 and even after enabling macros, it's not working correctly. I can't edit the blue boxes (OO says their protected cells), and the two graphs on the Portfolio sheet ("Portfolio Growth (Nominal) 19XX-2006") have nothing drawn in them.

I have access to Excel but I'm not a registered owner myself so I prefer to use OpenOffice. If anyone has experience getting Excel spreadsheets to work in OO I'd appreciate a conversion of Simba's latest rev6e.
- Jim in Austin, TX
kaesler
Posts: 241
Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2007 4:53 pm
Location: Boston, MA

Post by kaesler »

Regarding OpenOffice I think I found that if I used Excel to remove the cell locking I could then use it in OpenOffice. Give that a try?
User avatar
CyberBob
Posts: 3387
Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 1:53 pm

Unprotect Cells

Post by CyberBob »

Zapped wrote:I can't edit the blue boxes (OO says their protected cells)
Just select Tools --> Protect Document and uncheck Sheet...

Bob
User avatar
LH
Posts: 5490
Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2007 2:54 am

Post by LH »

I did as bob said, and OO.org spreadsheet allowed me to enter values, and the spreadsheet generated a graph and everything.

Often times, as with gummys spreadsheets, openoffice does not work with excel macros.

Also, I am using the Novell form of openoffice, which has extra excel macro support versus the regular openoffice. Often times, even with Novell openoffice, gummys spreadsheets do not work : ( But they are specifically working towards increasing the macro capability as I understand it.

If gummy and simba excel macro type spreadsheets are what you are trying to run using openoffice.org, I recommend downloading the novell form of openoffice.org from below. You will get less macro errors.

http://www.novell.com/products/desktop/ ... s/ooo.html

http://www.novell.com/news/press/novell ... perability
Last edited by LH on Thu Jun 14, 2007 11:47 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Post Reply