When to claim Social Security: two reasons not to wait

Non-investing personal finance issues including insurance, credit, real estate, taxes, employment and legal issues such as trusts and wills
JoeRetire
Posts: 1751
Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2018 2:44 pm

Re: When to claim Social Security: two reasons not to wait

Post by JoeRetire » Mon May 14, 2018 7:35 pm

David Jay wrote:
Mon May 14, 2018 3:52 pm
JoeRetire wrote:
Sun May 13, 2018 7:52 am
(Full disclosure: I'm 64 and my wife is 63 this year. We are planning to both wait until 70 to start our benefits. We still have 6-7 years to change our minds. No matter what, we intend to be happy.)
Joe:

I would take a good look at the numbers if the lower-earning spouse takes SS at FRA (likely 66 for you two) and higher earner waits until 70. There is no impact on survivor's benefit (survivor's benefit is the higher earner's benefit) and yields 4 years of additional benefits at the rate of the lower-earning spouse.
Thanks. I have looked at the numbers several ways - with my wife starting benefits at 62, 66.4 (her FRA) and 70.

My analysis and http://maximizemysocialsecurity.com both agree that my wife should also delay until 70. It's not a huge difference from her benefit at 66.5, and certainly one that we could change if for some reason we need the cash flow. But right now the plan is still for her to wait until 70.
Last edited by JoeRetire on Mon May 14, 2018 7:42 pm, edited 2 times in total.

JoeRetire
Posts: 1751
Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2018 2:44 pm

Re: When to claim Social Security: two reasons not to wait

Post by JoeRetire » Mon May 14, 2018 7:37 pm

FIREchief wrote:
Mon May 14, 2018 7:01 pm
jeffyscott wrote:
Mon May 14, 2018 5:25 pm
David Jay wrote:
Mon May 14, 2018 3:52 pm
JoeRetire wrote:
Sun May 13, 2018 7:52 am
(Full disclosure: I'm 64 and my wife is 63 this year. We are planning to both wait until 70 to start our benefits. We still have 6-7 years to change our minds. No matter what, we intend to be happy.)
Joe:

I would take a good look at the numbers if the lower-earning spouse takes SS at FRA (likely 66 for you two) and higher earner waits until 70. There is no impact on survivor's benefit (survivor's benefit is the higher earner's benefit) and yields 4 years of additional benefits at the rate of the lower-earning spouse.
That is the case even if lower earning spouse takes it at 62, isn't it?
This is a good question. If a lower earning spouse takes SS at 62 and the (much) higher earning spouse takes at 70. Is the survivor benefit for the lower earning spouse reduced??
No. The survivor benefit is not reduced in this case.

delamer
Posts: 6707
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2011 6:13 pm

Re: When to claim Social Security: two reasons not to wait

Post by delamer » Mon May 14, 2018 8:28 pm

FIREchief wrote:
Mon May 14, 2018 7:01 pm
jeffyscott wrote:
Mon May 14, 2018 5:25 pm
David Jay wrote:
Mon May 14, 2018 3:52 pm
JoeRetire wrote:
Sun May 13, 2018 7:52 am
(Full disclosure: I'm 64 and my wife is 63 this year. We are planning to both wait until 70 to start our benefits. We still have 6-7 years to change our minds. No matter what, we intend to be happy.)
Joe:

I would take a good look at the numbers if the lower-earning spouse takes SS at FRA (likely 66 for you two) and higher earner waits until 70. There is no impact on survivor's benefit (survivor's benefit is the higher earner's benefit) and yields 4 years of additional benefits at the rate of the lower-earning spouse.
That is the case even if lower earning spouse takes it at 62, isn't it?
This is a good question. If a lower earning spouse takes SS at 62 and the (much) higher earning spouse takes at 70. Is the survivor benefit for the lower earning spouse reduced??
No, the survivor benefit is not reduced. A spousal benefit will be reduced if taken before FRA.

User avatar
David Jay
Posts: 6029
Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2015 5:54 am
Location: Michigan

Re: When to claim Social Security: two reasons not to wait

Post by David Jay » Mon May 14, 2018 8:38 pm

JoeRetire wrote:
Mon May 14, 2018 7:35 pm
My analysis and http://maximizemysocialsecurity.com both agree that my wife should also delay until 70. It's not a huge difference from her benefit at 66.5, and certainly one that we could change if for some reason we need the cash flow. But right now the plan is still for her to wait until 70.
Like you say, you have 6 or 7 years to change your mind. Too many people tend to think the 3 choices are 62, FRA and 70 (benefit is actually calculated month by month).

[edit] My preferred SS calculator shows the difference between claiming 68 versus 70 depends on the NPV that I enter (2% vs 3%).
Prediction is very difficult, especially about the future - Niels Bohr | To get the "risk premium", you really do have to take the risk - nisiprius

User avatar
#Cruncher
Posts: 2712
Joined: Fri May 14, 2010 2:33 am
Location: New York City
Contact:

Re: When to claim Social Security: two reasons not to wait

Post by #Cruncher » Wed May 16, 2018 12:15 pm

JoeRetire wrote:
Mon May 14, 2018 7:35 pm
David Jay wrote:
Mon May 14, 2018 3:52 pm
JoeRetire wrote:
Sun May 13, 2018 7:52 am
(... I'm 64 and my wife is 63 this year. We are planning to both wait until 70 to start our benefits. ...)
... I would take a good look at the numbers ...
Thanks. I have looked at the numbers several ways - with my wife starting benefits at 62, 66.4 (her FRA) and 70. My analysis and http://maximizemysocialsecurity.com both agree that my wife should also delay until 70. It's not a huge difference from her benefit at 66.5, and certainly one that we could change if for some reason we need the cash flow. But right now the plan is still for her to wait until 70.
My analysis reaches a different conclusion, Joe. Whether your wife's Primary Insurance Amount (PIA) is 20%, 50%, or 80% of your PIA, the present value (PV) of her survival-weighted benefit decreases each year she delays claiming beyond age 62. The following table shows the PV of her survival-weighted benefit for each $100 of your annualized PIA when discounted at 2%. For example, if her PIA is 50% of yours, the PV of her survival-weighted benefit will be $572 for each $100 of your annualized PIA if she claims at age 62. But if she waits until age 70 to claim, the PV will be only $409.

Code: Select all

Wife PIA
 Pct of    ------------- Age Wife Claims -------------    70
Husb PIA    62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   vs 62
--------   ---  ---  ---  ---  ---  ---  ---  ---  ---   -----
  20%      441  432  422  411  399  385  370  354  319   (122)
  50%      572  549  524  497  467  447  438  425  409   (163)
  80%      759  751  745  739  728  715  700  680  654   (105)
This is based on the following assumptions:
  • Your wife's Normal Retirement Age (NRA) is 66.5 and she will receive less or more than her PIA for each claiming age as shown on this SSA table.
  • You are one year older and will claim your own benefit at age 70, so she will receive at least 50% of your PIA beginning at age 69 -- unless she waits until age 70 to claim.
  • Her benefit will continue (in addition to yours) only while both of you are alive. (Your benefit continues while either of you is alive -- either to you or to her as survivor.)
  • Both your mortality probabilities are given by the SSA 1960 Cohort Life Table.
For those interested, here is how I computed these results.
  • Computed her benefit per $100 of your PIA depending on when she claims. For example, the following table assumes her PIA is 50% of yours. It shows that if she claims at age 62 she'll receive $36.25 through age 68, and then $50 starting at age 69 (spousal benefit of 50% of your PIA). If she waits to claim until age 70, she'll receive $64 every year.

    Code: Select all

          ------------------ Claiming Age and Percent of PIA -------------------
            62      63      64      65      66      67      68      69      70
    Age  72.50%  77.50%  83.33%  90.00%  96.67% 104.00% 112.00% 120.00% 128.00%
    ---  ------  ------  ------  ------  ------ ------- ------- ------- -------
     62   36.25                                                                 
     63   36.25   38.75                                                         
     64   36.25   38.75   41.67                                                 
     65   36.25   38.75   41.67   45.00                                         
     66   36.25   38.75   41.67   45.00   48.33                                 
     67   36.25   38.75   41.67   45.00   48.33   52.00                         
     68   36.25   38.75   41.67   45.00   48.33   52.00   56.00                 
     69   50.00   50.00   50.00   50.00   50.00   52.00   56.00   60.00         
     70   50.00   50.00   50.00   50.00   50.00   52.00   56.00   60.00   64.00 
  • I applied the survival weights for both of you being alive from my longevity estimator for a male age 63 and a female age 62. Here is an example for the weights applied against $60 per year beginning at age 69:

    Code: Select all

                         Col W
                Odds    Survival
        Wife    Both    Weighted
    Row  Age    Alive    Benefit

    Code: Select all

      8   62   100.00%     0.00 
      9   63    97.93%     0.00 
     10   64    95.71%     0.00 
     11   65    93.33%     0.00 
     12   66    90.78%     0.00 
     13   67    88.08%     0.00 
     14   68    85.21%     0.00 
     15   69    82.21%    48.38 [*]
     16   70    79.06%    46.45 
     17   71    75.77%    44.43 
     18   72    72.34%    42.34 
     19   73    68.80%    40.19 
     20   74    65.18%    38.00 
     21   75    61.48%    35.74 
     22   76    57.67%    33.44 
     23   77    53.78%    31.09 
     24   78    49.84%    28.71 
     25   79    45.86%    26.32 
     26   80    41.89%    23.94 
     27   81    37.91%    21.55 
     28   82    33.93%    19.17 
     29   83    29.96%    16.80 
     30   84    26.03%    14.47 
     31   85    22.19%    12.22 
     32   86    18.54%    10.11 
     33   87    15.15%     8.17 
     34   88    12.09%     6.45 
     35   89     9.41%     4.97 
     36   90     7.14%     3.72 
     37   91     5.26%     2.70 
     38   92     3.75%     1.90 
     39   93     2.59%     1.29 
     40   94     1.72%     0.85 
     41   95     1.10%     0.53 
     42   96     0.68%     0.32 
     43   97     0.40%     0.19 
     44   98     0.23%     0.11 
     45   99     0.13%     0.06 
     46  100     0.07%     0.03 
     47  101     0.03%     0.02 
     48  102     0.02%     0.01 
     49  103     0.01%     0.00 
     50  104     0.00%     0.00 
     51  105     0.00%     0.00 
     52  106     0.00%     0.00 
    * Example calculation for age 69:
    48.38 = 60 * (82.21% + 79.06%) / 2
  • Present values calculated with the Excel NPV function. For example:
    425 = NPV(2%, W8:W52) * 1.02 ^ 0.5
    Note: $425 can also be calculated with the longevity estimator using 7 in cell I5 (since first payment delayed from 62 to 69), 0 in cells O1 and O2, 5 in cell O3 (monthly equivalent of $60 / year), and 2% in cell O4 (discount rate).

Jimmei1
Posts: 11
Joined: Sat Aug 30, 2014 12:24 pm

Re: When to claim Social Security: two reasons not to wait

Post by Jimmei1 » Wed May 16, 2018 12:40 pm

I turn 55 next month, switched to part time work this month, and plan to take SS at age 62, for my own two reasons:

1. When I use cfiresim or firecalc, I get the same income (within 2%) whether I use age 62, 67, or 70 to start SS. This is for covering my wife and me until we're 110/105, so just about indefinitely (I get similar results for shorter periods too). At these lifespans, taking SS at 70 at yields more SS income, but I think what's happening is the earlier SS helps mitigate unfavorable sequences of return in my other retirement savings.

2. Since I'll be 71 in 2034 when current projections say SS taxes won't be able to cover 100% of SS payouts, by taking at 62, I could have up to 9 years of payments under current law, in contrast to at most 1 year if I start at 70.

Together, this makes starting SS at 62 better for me than at 70.

JoeRetire
Posts: 1751
Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2018 2:44 pm

Re: When to claim Social Security: two reasons not to wait

Post by JoeRetire » Wed May 16, 2018 4:05 pm

#Cruncher wrote:
Wed May 16, 2018 12:15 pm
My analysis reaches a different conclusion, Joe.
Okay, Then we can agree to disagree.

Northern Flicker
Posts: 4138
Joined: Fri Apr 10, 2015 12:29 am
Location: Taking a break from Bogleheads

Re: When to claim Social Security: two reasons not to wait

Post by Northern Flicker » Wed May 16, 2018 5:02 pm

I'm not very knowledgeable of the fine points of different SS options, but was under the impression that, under the new rules, if someone delays SS and their spouse will receive a spousal benefit under a primary recipient's benefit, then once the spouse reaches FRA, the spousal regular benefit and spousal survivor benefit no longer increase from further delays by the primary to receive benefits. If this is correct, then there is a diminished benefit of the primary recipient delaying past their spouse's FRA.
Taking a break from Bogleheads.

delamer
Posts: 6707
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2011 6:13 pm

Re: When to claim Social Security: two reasons not to wait

Post by delamer » Wed May 16, 2018 5:18 pm

jalbert wrote:
Wed May 16, 2018 5:02 pm
I'm not very knowledgeable of the fine points of different SS options, but was under the impression that, under the new rules, if someone delays SS and their spouse will receive a spousal benefit under a primary recipient's benefit, then once the spouse reaches FRA, the spousal regular benefit and spousal survivor benefit no longer increase from further delays by the primary to receive benefits. If this is correct, then there is a diminished benefit of the primary recipient delaying past their spouse's FRA.
The survivor benefit is the higher of the two SS benefits being paid, regardless of when the spouse or survivor claimed his/her benefit.

The maximum spousal benefit is half of the husband’s/wife’s benefit at the the husband’s/wife’s FRA. This will be reduced if the spouse claims it prior to his/her own FRA.

JD58
Posts: 9
Joined: Sat Aug 05, 2017 6:08 pm

Re: When to claim Social Security: two reasons not to wait

Post by JD58 » Wed May 16, 2018 5:39 pm

delamer wrote:
Wed May 16, 2018 5:18 pm

The survivor benefit is the higher of the two SS benefits being paid, regardless of when the spouse or survivor claimed his/her benefit.

The maximum spousal benefit is half of the husband’s/wife’s benefit at the the husband’s/wife’s FRA. This will be reduced if the spouse claims it prior to his/her own FRA.
I want to confirm I understand this point as it will impact my wife and I. She is 3 years older and not enough quarters for PIA. So what you are saying is the her spousal benfits are "frosen" at 50% of my FRA benefits (age 66y8m). So in our case even though she will be 70 when I turn 66.8 there is really no spousal benefit growth for her if I wait to 70?

JoeRetire
Posts: 1751
Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2018 2:44 pm

Re: When to claim Social Security: two reasons not to wait

Post by JoeRetire » Wed May 16, 2018 5:43 pm

JD58 wrote:
Wed May 16, 2018 5:39 pm
delamer wrote:
Wed May 16, 2018 5:18 pm

The survivor benefit is the higher of the two SS benefits being paid, regardless of when the spouse or survivor claimed his/her benefit.

The maximum spousal benefit is half of the husband’s/wife’s benefit at the the husband’s/wife’s FRA. This will be reduced if the spouse claims it prior to his/her own FRA.
I want to confirm I understand this point as it will impact my wife and I. She is 3 years older and not enough quarters for PIA. So what you are saying is the her spousal benfits are "frosen" at 50% of my FRA benefits (age 66y8m). So in our case even though she will be 70 when I turn 66.8 there is really no spousal benefit growth for her if I wait to 70?
That's correct. There's no spousal benefit growth if you wait to 70.
Of course your own benefit will increase if you wait until 70, for the rest of your life. And if your wife outlives you, her survivor benefit is increased as well, for the rest of her life.

JD58
Posts: 9
Joined: Sat Aug 05, 2017 6:08 pm

Re: When to claim Social Security: two reasons not to wait

Post by JD58 » Wed May 16, 2018 5:46 pm

Thanks, that was the clarity I was after.

Northern Flicker
Posts: 4138
Joined: Fri Apr 10, 2015 12:29 am
Location: Taking a break from Bogleheads

Re: When to claim Social Security: two reasons not to wait

Post by Northern Flicker » Wed May 16, 2018 5:49 pm

The survivor benefit is the higher of the two SS benefits being paid, regardless of when the spouse or survivor claimed his/her benefit.

The maximum spousal benefit is half of the husband’s/wife’s benefit at the the husband’s/wife’s FRA. This will be reduced if the spouse claims it prior to his/her own FRA
The second statement is ambiguous. I believe the maximum spousal benefit is half the primary's benefit when the non-prinary spouse reaches FRA. Is that what you meant?

So a survivor benefit grows beyond the survivor's FRA had the prinary continued to delay past that FRA, but the regular spousal benefit does not continue to grow past spousal FRA even if the primary delays past that point.
Taking a break from Bogleheads.

vested1
Posts: 1655
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2012 4:20 pm

Re: When to claim Social Security: two reasons not to wait

Post by vested1 » Wed May 16, 2018 5:58 pm

jalbert wrote:
Wed May 16, 2018 5:49 pm
The survivor benefit is the higher of the two SS benefits being paid, regardless of when the spouse or survivor claimed his/her benefit.

The maximum spousal benefit is half of the husband’s/wife’s benefit at the the husband’s/wife’s FRA. This will be reduced if the spouse claims it prior to his/her own FRA
The second statement is ambiguous. I believe the maximum spousal benefit is half the primary's benefit when the non-prinary spouse reaches FRA. Is that what you meant?

So a survivor benefit grows beyond the survivor's FRA had the prinary continued to delay past that FRA, but the regular spousal benefit does not continue to grow past spousal FRA even if the primary delays past that point.
The confusion comes from using the wrong terms. PIA should be used to avoid confusion. PIA is the amount of benefits at FRA. Spousal can be no more than 1/2 of the spouse's PIA who has claimed their own benefit, reduced if the one claiming spousal does so before their own FRA.

Survivor benefits are the larger of the two benefits at the time of death, which continue to grow with COLA only. If survivor benefits are taken before the survivor's FRA the amount is also reduced.

Northern Flicker
Posts: 4138
Joined: Fri Apr 10, 2015 12:29 am
Location: Taking a break from Bogleheads

Re: When to claim Social Security: two reasons not to wait

Post by Northern Flicker » Wed May 16, 2018 7:18 pm

Thanks, but it is still ambiguous as both spouses have a FRA but the usage is not clarified.

Suppose spouse P, who will file for a primary benefit, is 1 year older than spouse S, who will claim a spousal benefit based on P’s PIA. Suppose both reach FRA at age 67.

If P delays past age 67, both benefits increase the first year. Would it be true that S’s benefit will stop increasing once S reaches FRA at 67 even if P continues to delay benefits past that point (eg 2 more years to age 70)? That would be my understanding.

Per above, S’s survivor benefit does continue to increase for any delay P does leading to an increase in P’s benefit even if S is past S’s FRA.
Taking a break from Bogleheads.

boglegirl
Posts: 276
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2012 1:41 pm

Re: When to claim Social Security: two reasons not to wait

Post by boglegirl » Thu May 17, 2018 7:55 am

jalbert wrote:
Wed May 16, 2018 7:18 pm
Thanks, but it is still ambiguous as both spouses have a FRA but the usage is not clarified.

Suppose spouse P, who will file for a primary benefit, is 1 year older than spouse S, who will claim a spousal benefit based on P’s PIA. Suppose both reach FRA at age 67.

If P delays past age 67, both benefits increase the first year. Would it be true that S’s benefit will stop increasing once S reaches FRA at 67 even if P continues to delay benefits past that point (eg 2 more years to age 70)? That would be my understanding.
...
Yes. The PIA will be not change after P reaches 67, but S's percentage of it would be reduced if s/he doesn't wait until 67 to claim. Then it won't increase any more after age 67. But keep in mind that S can't claim spousal benefits until P claims benefits.

Chip
Posts: 2399
Joined: Wed Feb 21, 2007 4:57 am

Re: When to claim Social Security: two reasons not to wait

Post by Chip » Thu May 17, 2018 2:57 pm

vested1 wrote:
Wed May 16, 2018 5:58 pm
If survivor benefits are taken before the survivor's FRA the amount is also reduced.
A minor addition/clarification: FRA for survivors is based on a slightly different age table than for retirees. For example, FRA for regular benefit purposes is 66 yrs 4 months for someone born in 1956. For survivor benefits, those born in 1956 have an FRA of 66 yrs 0 months. Effectively the FRA age/DOB table is shifted 2 years for survivors, in their favor.

User avatar
#Cruncher
Posts: 2712
Joined: Fri May 14, 2010 2:33 am
Location: New York City
Contact:

Re: When to claim Social Security: two reasons not to wait

Post by #Cruncher » Fri May 18, 2018 9:01 am

Jimmei1 wrote:
Wed May 16, 2018 12:40 pm
1. When I use cfiresim or firecalc, I get the same income (within 2%) whether I use age 62, 67, or 70 to start SS. This is for covering my wife and me until we're 110/105, ... I think what's happening is the earlier SS helps mitigate unfavorable sequences of return in my other retirement savings.
Given current SS benefit levels, I can't construct a reasonable scenario where, if when starting SS at age 62 one still has a positive portfolio balance at age 110, one wouldn't have significantly more when starting at age 70. (I suspect your results are because cFIREsim and FIRECalc are assuming SS benefits fall in the future.) To illustrate I ran a simple simulation where:

Code: Select all

Period:                              48 years from age 62 to 110
Annual real spending:               $49,000
Real SS if start at age 62:         $21,000 ( 70% of $30,000 PIA) [1]
Real SS if start at age 70:         $37,200 (124% of $30,000 PIA) [1]
Initial portfolio balance:         $700,000 (25X $28,000)
Average real growth over 48 years:  4%
I modeled "sequence of returns" risk by assuming various growth rates the first year after age 62 followed by a constant growth rate the next 47 years such that the average over 48 years was 4%. Here are key points for four different assumptions of first year growth:

Code: Select all

Growth first year             4.000%  (19.000%)  (31.500%)  (38.000%)
Growth subsequent years       4.000%    4.555%     4.928%     5.151%
                              ------    ------     ------     ------
Age 110 balance - start 62       700        0       (395)      (550)  (in 000's)
                - start 70     1,310      585          2       (232)  (in 000's)
Age fail        - start 62       n/a      n/a         96         91
                - start 70       n/a      n/a        n/a         91
Age better when start at 70       87       89         90         91
Taking SS at age 62 would succeed unless the first year growth rate was worse than -19%. Taking SS at age 70 would succeed unless the first year growth was worse than -31.5%. If it was worse than -38%, then taking SS at age 70 would fail at an earlier age than taking SS at age 62. Here is the detail for the case of -31.5% "growth" in year one:

Code: Select all

      -------- Savings Balance --------
Age   SS at 62    SS at 70     70 vs 62

Code: Select all

 62    700,000     700,000            0 
 63    451,500     430,500      (21,000) [2]
 64    445,750     402,715      (43,035)
 65    439,717     373,561      (66,156)
 66    433,387     342,971      (90,416)
 67    426,744     310,873     (115,872)
 68    419,775     277,193     (142,582)
 69    412,461     241,853     (170,608)
 70    404,788     204,772     (200,016)
 71    396,736     203,063     (193,673) [3]
 72    388,287     201,270     (187,017)
 73    379,423     199,389     (180,034)
 74    370,121     197,415     (172,706)
 75    360,361     195,344     (165,017)
 76    350,119     193,170     (156,949)
 77    339,374     190,890     (148,484)
 78    328,098     188,497     (139,601)
 79    316,267     185,986     (130,281)
 80    303,853     183,352     (120,501)
 81    290,827     180,588     (110,240)
 82    277,159     177,687      (99,472)
 83    262,818     174,644      (88,174)
 84    247,770     171,450      (76,320)
 85    231,980     168,099      (63,881)
 86    215,412     164,583      (50,829)
 87    198,028     160,894      (37,134)
 88    179,787     157,023      (22,764)
 89    160,647     152,961       (7,685)
 90    140,564     148,699        8,136 <-- starting at 70 better
 91    119,491     144,227       24,737 
 92     97,379     139,535       42,156 
 93     74,178     134,611       60,433 
 94     49,834     129,445       79,612
 95     24,289     124,024       99,735 
 96     (2,514)    118,336      120,850 <-- starting at 62 fails
 97    (30,514)    112,368      142,882 
 98    (58,514)    106,106      164,619 
 99    (86,514)     99,535      186,048 
100   (114,514)     92,640      207,153 
101   (142,514)     85,405      227,919 
102   (170,514)     77,814      248,327 
103   (198,514)     69,849      268,362 
104   (226,514)     61,491      288,004 
105   (254,514)     52,721      307,235 
106   (282,514)     43,519      326,033 
107   (310,514)     33,864      344,377 
108   (338,514)     23,733      362,246 
109   (366,514)     13,102      379,616 
110   (394,514)      1,948      396,461
  1. 70% and 124% are from this SSA table for Normal Retirement Age of 67.
  2. Example calculation for balance at age 63:

    Code: Select all

    Start at 62: 451,500 = 700000 * 0.685 - 49000 + 21000
    Start at 70: 430,500 = 700000 * 0.685 - 49000 +     0
  3. Example calculation for balance at age 71:

    Code: Select all

    Start at 62: 396,736 = 404788 * 1.04928 - 49000 + 21000
    Start at 70: 203,063 = 204772 * 1.04928 - 49000 + 37200

User avatar
dm200
Posts: 19048
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 2:21 pm
Location: Washington DC area

Re: When to claim Social Security: two reasons not to wait

Post by dm200 » Fri May 18, 2018 11:18 am

One factor I would consider is "asset protection". if you claim early with the plan of accumulating the funds for spending later (or much later), such assets might be at some degree of risk. On the other hand, a larger stream of SS retirement income starting later is at (much) less risk.

DrGoogle2017
Posts: 1820
Joined: Mon Aug 14, 2017 12:31 pm

Re: When to claim Social Security: two reasons not to wait

Post by DrGoogle2017 » Thu Dec 27, 2018 4:06 pm

delamer wrote:
Mon May 14, 2018 8:28 pm
FIREchief wrote:
Mon May 14, 2018 7:01 pm
jeffyscott wrote:
Mon May 14, 2018 5:25 pm
David Jay wrote:
Mon May 14, 2018 3:52 pm
JoeRetire wrote:
Sun May 13, 2018 7:52 am
(Full disclosure: I'm 64 and my wife is 63 this year. We are planning to both wait until 70 to start our benefits. We still have 6-7 years to change our minds. No matter what, we intend to be happy.)
Joe:

I would take a good look at the numbers if the lower-earning spouse takes SS at FRA (likely 66 for you two) and higher earner waits until 70. There is no impact on survivor's benefit (survivor's benefit is the higher earner's benefit) and yields 4 years of additional benefits at the rate of the lower-earning spouse.
That is the case even if lower earning spouse takes it at 62, isn't it?
This is a good question. If a lower earning spouse takes SS at 62 and the (much) higher earning spouse takes at 70. Is the survivor benefit for the lower earning spouse reduced??
No, the survivor benefit is not reduced. A spousal benefit will be reduced if taken before FRA.
Is this still true? We seem to have conflicting information on boggle head forum here.

DrGoogle2017
Posts: 1820
Joined: Mon Aug 14, 2017 12:31 pm

Re: When to claim Social Security: two reasons not to wait

Post by DrGoogle2017 » Thu Dec 27, 2018 4:08 pm

delamer wrote:
Wed May 16, 2018 5:18 pm
jalbert wrote:
Wed May 16, 2018 5:02 pm
I'm not very knowledgeable of the fine points of different SS options, but was under the impression that, under the new rules, if someone delays SS and their spouse will receive a spousal benefit under a primary recipient's benefit, then once the spouse reaches FRA, the spousal regular benefit and spousal survivor benefit no longer increase from further delays by the primary to receive benefits. If this is correct, then there is a diminished benefit of the primary recipient delaying past their spouse's FRA.
The survivor benefit is the higher of the two SS benefits being paid, regardless of when the spouse or survivor claimed his/her benefit.

The maximum spousal benefit is half of the husband’s/wife’s benefit at the the husband’s/wife’s FRA. This will be reduced if the spouse claims it prior to his/her own FRA.
@ObliviousInvestor seems to disagree with you. Who’s right?

User avatar
ObliviousInvestor
Posts: 3477
Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 9:32 am
Contact:

Re: When to claim Social Security: two reasons not to wait

Post by ObliviousInvestor » Thu Dec 27, 2018 4:11 pm

DrGoogle2017 wrote:
Thu Dec 27, 2018 4:06 pm
delamer wrote:
Mon May 14, 2018 8:28 pm
FIREchief wrote:
Mon May 14, 2018 7:01 pm
jeffyscott wrote:
Mon May 14, 2018 5:25 pm
David Jay wrote:
Mon May 14, 2018 3:52 pm

Joe:

I would take a good look at the numbers if the lower-earning spouse takes SS at FRA (likely 66 for you two) and higher earner waits until 70. There is no impact on survivor's benefit (survivor's benefit is the higher earner's benefit) and yields 4 years of additional benefits at the rate of the lower-earning spouse.
That is the case even if lower earning spouse takes it at 62, isn't it?
This is a good question. If a lower earning spouse takes SS at 62 and the (much) higher earning spouse takes at 70. Is the survivor benefit for the lower earning spouse reduced??
No, the survivor benefit is not reduced. A spousal benefit will be reduced if taken before FRA.
Is this still true? We seem to have conflicting information on boggle head forum here.
Yes, this is still true.
Mike Piper, author/blogger

User avatar
ObliviousInvestor
Posts: 3477
Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 9:32 am
Contact:

Re: When to claim Social Security: two reasons not to wait

Post by ObliviousInvestor » Thu Dec 27, 2018 4:15 pm

DrGoogle2017 wrote:
Thu Dec 27, 2018 4:08 pm
delamer wrote:
Wed May 16, 2018 5:18 pm
jalbert wrote:
Wed May 16, 2018 5:02 pm
I'm not very knowledgeable of the fine points of different SS options, but was under the impression that, under the new rules, if someone delays SS and their spouse will receive a spousal benefit under a primary recipient's benefit, then once the spouse reaches FRA, the spousal regular benefit and spousal survivor benefit no longer increase from further delays by the primary to receive benefits. If this is correct, then there is a diminished benefit of the primary recipient delaying past their spouse's FRA.
The survivor benefit is the higher of the two SS benefits being paid, regardless of when the spouse or survivor claimed his/her benefit.

The maximum spousal benefit is half of the husband’s/wife’s benefit at the the husband’s/wife’s FRA. This will be reduced if the spouse claims it prior to his/her own FRA.
@ObliviousInvestor seems to disagree with you. Who’s right?
I don't think I disagree with what delamer wrote here. I have replied with more information in the other thread.
viewtopic.php?p=4283501#p4283501
Mike Piper, author/blogger

DrGoogle2017
Posts: 1820
Joined: Mon Aug 14, 2017 12:31 pm

Re: When to claim Social Security: two reasons not to wait

Post by DrGoogle2017 » Thu Dec 27, 2018 4:20 pm

ObliviousInvestor wrote:
Thu Dec 27, 2018 4:15 pm
DrGoogle2017 wrote:
Thu Dec 27, 2018 4:08 pm
delamer wrote:
Wed May 16, 2018 5:18 pm
jalbert wrote:
Wed May 16, 2018 5:02 pm
I'm not very knowledgeable of the fine points of different SS options, but was under the impression that, under the new rules, if someone delays SS and their spouse will receive a spousal benefit under a primary recipient's benefit, then once the spouse reaches FRA, the spousal regular benefit and spousal survivor benefit no longer increase from further delays by the primary to receive benefits. If this is correct, then there is a diminished benefit of the primary recipient delaying past their spouse's FRA.
The survivor benefit is the higher of the two SS benefits being paid, regardless of when the spouse or survivor claimed his/her benefit.
But You wrote for survivor benefit it does matter what age the non living spouse claimed his/her benefit
The maximum spousal benefit is half of the husband’s/wife’s benefit at the the husband’s/wife’s FRA. This will be reduced if the spouse claims it prior to his/her own FRA.
@ObliviousInvestor seems to disagree with you. Who’s right?
I don't think I disagree with what delamer wrote here. I have replied with more information in the other thread.
viewtopic.php?p=4283501#p4283501
This is my understand, so why did you say I was incorrect.

User avatar
ObliviousInvestor
Posts: 3477
Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 9:32 am
Contact:

Re: When to claim Social Security: two reasons not to wait

Post by ObliviousInvestor » Thu Dec 27, 2018 4:23 pm

Yes, it does matter when the deceased spouse claimed his/her retirement benefit when calculating a survivor benefit for the other (surviving) spouse.

I will post the same example here:
Example: we have Spouse A and Spouse B, and Spouse A is the higher earner. Each person has filed for his/her own retirement benefit. Spouse A dies. Spouse B files for survivor benefits.

When calculating Spouse B's new total monthly benefit:
1) The age at which Spouse A filed for retirement benefits matters.
2) The age at which Spouse B files for survivor benefits matters.
3) The age at which Spouse B originally filed for retirement benefits does not matter (probably).
Mike Piper, author/blogger

DrGoogle2017
Posts: 1820
Joined: Mon Aug 14, 2017 12:31 pm

Re: When to claim Social Security: two reasons not to wait

Post by DrGoogle2017 » Thu Dec 27, 2018 4:27 pm

ObliviousInvestor wrote:
Thu Dec 27, 2018 4:23 pm
Yes, it does matter when the deceased spouse claimed his/her retirement benefit when calculating a survivor benefit for the other (surviving) spouse.

I will post the same example here:
Example: we have Spouse A and Spouse B, and Spouse A is the higher earner. Each person has filed for his/her own retirement benefit. Spouse A dies. Spouse B files for survivor benefits.

When calculating Spouse B's new total monthly benefit:
1) The age at which Spouse A filed for retirement benefits matters.
2) The age at which Spouse B files for survivor benefits matters.
3) The age at which Spouse B originally filed for retirement benefits does not matter (probably).
Not according to SS website regarding survivor benefits. There is no mention of what age the non living spouse took his SS. Sorry repeating the same example didn’t do it for me. The age of the surviving spouse matters, not the age of when the non living spouse took his/her SS.

User avatar
ObliviousInvestor
Posts: 3477
Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 9:32 am
Contact:

Re: When to claim Social Security: two reasons not to wait

Post by ObliviousInvestor » Thu Dec 27, 2018 4:31 pm

DrGoogle2017 wrote:
Thu Dec 27, 2018 4:27 pm
ObliviousInvestor wrote:
Thu Dec 27, 2018 4:23 pm
Yes, it does matter when the deceased spouse claimed his/her retirement benefit when calculating a survivor benefit for the other (surviving) spouse.

I will post the same example here:
Example: we have Spouse A and Spouse B, and Spouse A is the higher earner. Each person has filed for his/her own retirement benefit. Spouse A dies. Spouse B files for survivor benefits.

When calculating Spouse B's new total monthly benefit:
1) The age at which Spouse A filed for retirement benefits matters.
2) The age at which Spouse B files for survivor benefits matters.
3) The age at which Spouse B originally filed for retirement benefits does not matter (probably).
Not according to SS website regarding survivor benefits. There is no mention of what age the non living spouse took his SS. Sorry repeating the same example didn’t do it for me.
Here's the applicable regulation (on the SSA website), explaining that the age at which the deceased person filed for retirement benefits does matter when calculating a survivor benefit for the surviving spouse:
https://www.ssa.gov/OP_Home/cfr20/404/404-0338.htm

Here's the applicable POMS reference on the SSA website explaining that the age at which the deceased person filed for retirement benefits does matter when calculating a survivor benefit for the surviving spouse:
https://secure.ssa.gov/apps10/poms.nsf/lnx/0300207002
Mike Piper, author/blogger

DrGoogle2017
Posts: 1820
Joined: Mon Aug 14, 2017 12:31 pm

Re: When to claim Social Security: two reasons not to wait

Post by DrGoogle2017 » Thu Dec 27, 2018 4:39 pm

So then @delamer is not correct then. That’s the clarification I need.

delamer
Posts: 6707
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2011 6:13 pm

Re: When to claim Social Security: two reasons not to wait

Post by delamer » Thu Dec 27, 2018 5:03 pm

DrGoogle2017 wrote:
Thu Dec 27, 2018 4:39 pm
So then @delamer is not correct then. That’s the clarification I need.
I could be, and I apologize if so.

I said “ The survivor benefit is the higher of the two SS benefits being paid, regardless of when the spouse or survivor claimed his/her benefit.”

Assume the following:

Both spouses are 62 or older.
No SSDI for either.
Spouse with higher PIA is receiving a benefit.

If the spouse with higher PIA dies first, does the age of either (at the time of death) affect the survivor’s benefit?

Likewise, does the age when either initially claimed (or not) their personal benefit affect the survivor’s benefit?

User avatar
ObliviousInvestor
Posts: 3477
Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 9:32 am
Contact:

Re: When to claim Social Security: two reasons not to wait

Post by ObliviousInvestor » Thu Dec 27, 2018 5:10 pm

delamer wrote:
Thu Dec 27, 2018 5:03 pm
Assume the following:

Both spouses are 62 or older.
No SSDI for either.
Spouse with higher PIA is receiving a benefit.

If the spouse with higher PIA dies first, does the age of either (at the time of death) affect the survivor’s benefit?
In this particular set of facts, no.

The age of the deceased spouse at time of death would matter if he/she had not yet filed for retirement benefits.

And, while the age of the surviving spouse at the time of the death does not matter, the age of the surviving spouse on the date he/she files for survivor benefits does matter.
delamer wrote:
Thu Dec 27, 2018 5:03 pm
Likewise, does the age when either initially claimed (or not) their personal benefit affect the survivor’s benefit?
The age at which the deceased (higher earner) filed for retirement benefits does affect the amount of the survivor's survivor benefit.

The age at which the surviving (lower earner) filed for retirement benefits will not (in most cases) affect the total amount that the surviving spouse receives per month after filing for a survivor benefit.
Mike Piper, author/blogger

delamer
Posts: 6707
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2011 6:13 pm

Re: When to claim Social Security: two reasons not to wait

Post by delamer » Thu Dec 27, 2018 5:21 pm

ObliviousInvestor wrote:
Thu Dec 27, 2018 5:10 pm
delamer wrote:
Thu Dec 27, 2018 5:03 pm
Assume the following:

Both spouses are 62 or older.
No SSDI for either.
Spouse with higher PIA is receiving a benefit.

If the spouse with higher PIA dies first, does the age of either (at the time of death) affect the survivor’s benefit?
In this particular set of facts, no.

The age of the deceased spouse at time of death would matter if he/she had not yet filed for retirement benefits.

And, while the age of the surviving spouse at the time of the death does not matter, the age of the surviving spouse on the date he/she files for survivor benefits does matter.
delamer wrote:
Thu Dec 27, 2018 5:03 pm
Likewise, does the age when either initially claimed (or not) their personal benefit affect the survivor’s benefit?
The age at which the deceased (higher earner) filed for retirement benefits does affect the amount of the survivor's survivor benefit.

The age at which the surviving (lower earner) filed for retirement benefits will not (in most cases) affect the total amount that the surviving spouse receives per month after filing for a survivor benefit.
This helps me. Thanks.

Obviously, the age (on the 62 to 70 continuum) when the higher earner claims his/her benefit determines the amount received. But does his/her claiming age affect the survivor benefit later received by the spouse in any other way?

User avatar
jeffyscott
Posts: 7517
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 9:12 am
Location: Wisconsin

Re: When to claim Social Security: two reasons not to wait

Post by jeffyscott » Thu Dec 27, 2018 5:32 pm

delamer wrote:
Thu Dec 27, 2018 5:21 pm
Obviously, the age (on the 62 to 70 continuum) when the higher earner claims his/her benefit determines the amount received. But does his/her claiming age affect the survivor benefit later received by the spouse in any other way?
Doesn't the surviving spouse simply continue to get the same benefit that the deceased was collecting, while their own, lower, benefit ceases?
press on, regardless - John C. Bogle

User avatar
jeffyscott
Posts: 7517
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 9:12 am
Location: Wisconsin

Re: When to claim Social Security: two reasons not to wait

Post by jeffyscott » Thu Dec 27, 2018 5:33 pm

ObliviousInvestor wrote:
Thu Dec 27, 2018 5:10 pm
The age of the deceased spouse at time of death would matter if he/she had not yet filed for retirement benefits.

In what way?
press on, regardless - John C. Bogle

CMD1
Posts: 52
Joined: Tue Nov 28, 2017 8:10 pm

Re: When to claim Social Security: two reasons not to wait

Post by CMD1 » Thu Dec 27, 2018 5:34 pm

I've read studies that indicate a very large percentage of the general population who take it at 62 regret that they took it early. Yet more people take it at 62 than any other age.

https://www.marketwatch.com/story/why-p ... 2018-09-04

User avatar
ObliviousInvestor
Posts: 3477
Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 9:32 am
Contact:

Re: When to claim Social Security: two reasons not to wait

Post by ObliviousInvestor » Thu Dec 27, 2018 5:40 pm

delamer wrote:
Thu Dec 27, 2018 5:21 pm
Obviously, the age (on the 62 to 70 continuum) when the higher earner claims his/her benefit determines the amount received. But does his/her claiming age affect the survivor benefit later received by the spouse in any other way?
I'm not entirely sure I understand what you're asking here. If the deceased spouse had already filed, one of the factors in the calculation of survivor benefits for surviving spouse is "amount deceased spouse was receiving." So the age at which that person filed is relevant. I'm not sure what "other way" you may be concerned about.
Mike Piper, author/blogger

User avatar
ObliviousInvestor
Posts: 3477
Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 9:32 am
Contact:

Re: When to claim Social Security: two reasons not to wait

Post by ObliviousInvestor » Thu Dec 27, 2018 5:41 pm

jeffyscott wrote:
Thu Dec 27, 2018 5:32 pm
delamer wrote:
Thu Dec 27, 2018 5:21 pm
Obviously, the age (on the 62 to 70 continuum) when the higher earner claims his/her benefit determines the amount received. But does his/her claiming age affect the survivor benefit later received by the spouse in any other way?
Doesn't the surviving spouse simply continue to get the same benefit that the deceased was collecting, while their own, lower, benefit ceases?
Technically, no. They continue to receive their own retirement benefit. Then they may get an additional survivor benefit to bring their total monthly benefit up to an amount equal to the amount the deceased was receiving -- or up to 82.5% of the deceased's PIA.
Mike Piper, author/blogger

User avatar
ObliviousInvestor
Posts: 3477
Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 9:32 am
Contact:

Re: When to claim Social Security: two reasons not to wait

Post by ObliviousInvestor » Thu Dec 27, 2018 5:43 pm

jeffyscott wrote:
Thu Dec 27, 2018 5:33 pm
ObliviousInvestor wrote:
Thu Dec 27, 2018 5:10 pm
The age of the deceased spouse at time of death would matter if he/she had not yet filed for retirement benefits.

In what way?
If the deceased had not yet filed, and the surviving spouse waits until his/her survivor FRA to file for survivor benefits, the total monthly benefit the surviving spouse would receive would be the deceased's PIA (if he/she died prior to FRA) or the amount the deceased would have received if he/she had filed on date of death (if he/she died after FRA).

(This is assuming that the surviving spouse is the lower earner. I'm also assuming for almost this entire discussion that there are no other complicating factors, such as children or a government pension.)
Mike Piper, author/blogger

delamer
Posts: 6707
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2011 6:13 pm

Re: When to claim Social Security: two reasons not to wait

Post by delamer » Thu Dec 27, 2018 5:54 pm

ObliviousInvestor wrote:
Thu Dec 27, 2018 5:40 pm
delamer wrote:
Thu Dec 27, 2018 5:21 pm
Obviously, the age (on the 62 to 70 continuum) when the higher earner claims his/her benefit determines the amount received. But does his/her claiming age affect the survivor benefit later received by the spouse in any other way?
I'm not entirely sure I understand what you're asking here. If the deceased spouse had already filed, one of the factors in the calculation of survivor benefits for surviving spouse is "amount deceased spouse was receiving." So the age at which that person filed is relevant. I'm not sure what "other way" you may be concerned about.
I took it that it was understood on this thread that the deceased spouse’s age when s/he filed is a primary factor in determining that person’s benefit amount. And therefore in determining the survivor’s benefit as well.

So the issue is whether there is any “secondary” effect of the deceased spouse’s filing age on the survivor’s benefit?

Trader Joe
Posts: 280
Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2014 6:38 pm

Re: When to claim Social Security: two reasons not to wait

Post by Trader Joe » Thu Dec 27, 2018 5:55 pm

Church Lady wrote:
Thu Jan 25, 2018 1:50 am
I stumbled upon this article today in my web travels:

http://danielamerman.com/va/BenefitAge.html
Making optimal decisions about when to claim Social Security benefits is of vital importance. For a person of retirement age with average savings, this choice may be more important than any other aspect of financial planning when it comes to the standard of living in retirement – yet, much of the information available is overly simplistic. This analysis looks at the claiming decision on four different levels, to better capture the tradeoffs involved and the impact that different choices can have.
Whereas I see much Boglehead discussion about the benefit to waiting until age 70 to claim, I don't see much discussion of 'hold harmless' and trust fund depletion.

So is this guy onto something? Or not? I have a few years before I can claim, but the discussion may help persons age 62+.
I will claim just as soon as I am eligible. Day 1. No analysis required.

Turbo29
Posts: 283
Joined: Tue May 01, 2018 7:12 am

Re: When to claim Social Security: two reasons not to wait

Post by Turbo29 » Thu Dec 27, 2018 6:02 pm

After reading that article I may claim at 65 when I retire rather than waiting until 66 and 2 months which is my full retirement age or later.

User avatar
jeffyscott
Posts: 7517
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 9:12 am
Location: Wisconsin

Re: When to claim Social Security: two reasons not to wait

Post by jeffyscott » Thu Dec 27, 2018 6:05 pm

ObliviousInvestor wrote:
Thu Dec 27, 2018 5:43 pm
If the deceased had not yet filed, and the surviving spouse waits until his/her survivor FRA to file for survivor benefits, the total monthly benefit the surviving spouse would receive would be the deceased's PIA (if he/she died prior to FRA) or the amount the deceased would have received if he/she had filed on date of death (if he/she died after FRA).
So if I (FRA 67) as the higher earner die at 60, my spouse would get no increase in survivor benefit by delaying beyond the date at which I would've turned 67? And if I die at 68, then there is no increase in benefit for any delay?

If I have understood correctly, this means, spouse should generally file for survivor benefit by the later of the date deceased would've reached FRA or the date of death.
press on, regardless - John C. Bogle

User avatar
jeffyscott
Posts: 7517
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 9:12 am
Location: Wisconsin

Re: When to claim Social Security: two reasons not to wait

Post by jeffyscott » Thu Dec 27, 2018 6:08 pm

Trader Joe wrote:
Thu Dec 27, 2018 5:55 pm
I will claim just as soon as I am eligible. Day 1. No analysis required.
Well, there is no analysis required to make any decision.

One could just as well say: "I will claim at 70 to get the maximum monthly benefit. No analysis required".
press on, regardless - John C. Bogle

User avatar
jeffyscott
Posts: 7517
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 9:12 am
Location: Wisconsin

Re: When to claim Social Security: two reasons not to wait

Post by jeffyscott » Thu Dec 27, 2018 6:16 pm

ObliviousInvestor wrote:
Thu Dec 27, 2018 5:41 pm
jeffyscott wrote:
Thu Dec 27, 2018 5:32 pm
delamer wrote:
Thu Dec 27, 2018 5:21 pm
Obviously, the age (on the 62 to 70 continuum) when the higher earner claims his/her benefit determines the amount received. But does his/her claiming age affect the survivor benefit later received by the spouse in any other way?
Doesn't the surviving spouse simply continue to get the same benefit that the deceased was collecting, while their own, lower, benefit ceases?
Technically, no. They continue to receive their own retirement benefit. Then they may get an additional survivor benefit to bring their total monthly benefit up to an amount equal to the amount the deceased was receiving -- or up to 82.5% of the deceased's PIA.
Right, I understand the odd way SS likes to phrase it.

I saw that 82.5% at one of your links. Does that mean if I claimed at 62, which for me would mean I get 70% of PIA, that my spouse would still get a total benefit equal to 82.5% of my PIA upon my demise? (Assume that my spouse's own benefit is much less than 82.5% of my PIA)
press on, regardless - John C. Bogle

User avatar
ObliviousInvestor
Posts: 3477
Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 9:32 am
Contact:

Re: When to claim Social Security: two reasons not to wait

Post by ObliviousInvestor » Thu Dec 27, 2018 6:45 pm

delamer wrote:
Thu Dec 27, 2018 5:54 pm
I took it that it was understood on this thread that the deceased spouse’s age when s/he filed is a primary factor in determining that person’s benefit amount. And therefore in determining the survivor’s benefit as well.

So the issue is whether there is any “secondary” effect of the deceased spouse’s filing age on the survivor’s benefit?
Hmm. Well, one secondary effect I can think of is that it would have a role in family maximum applications. For example, because the survivor's survivor benefit is greater if the deceased filed later, a greater portion of the family maximum would go to the surviving spouse, which would mean less would go to the kid(s). There are likely other such things as well (i.e., things affected by the amount of the survivor benefit).
Mike Piper, author/blogger

User avatar
ObliviousInvestor
Posts: 3477
Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 9:32 am
Contact:

Re: When to claim Social Security: two reasons not to wait

Post by ObliviousInvestor » Thu Dec 27, 2018 6:47 pm

jeffyscott wrote:
Thu Dec 27, 2018 6:05 pm
ObliviousInvestor wrote:
Thu Dec 27, 2018 5:43 pm
If the deceased had not yet filed, and the surviving spouse waits until his/her survivor FRA to file for survivor benefits, the total monthly benefit the surviving spouse would receive would be the deceased's PIA (if he/she died prior to FRA) or the amount the deceased would have received if he/she had filed on date of death (if he/she died after FRA).
So if I (FRA 67) as the higher earner die at 60, my spouse would get no increase in survivor benefit by delaying beyond the date at which I would've turned 67? And if I die at 68, then there is no increase in benefit for any delay?

If I have understood correctly, this means, spouse should generally file for survivor benefit by the later of the date deceased would've reached FRA or the date of death.
Your surviving spouse would get no increase in survivor benefit by delaying beyond the date at which they reach their survivor FRA. If the surviving spouse files for survivor benefits prior to FRA, there is a reduction in such benefits.
Mike Piper, author/blogger

User avatar
ObliviousInvestor
Posts: 3477
Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 9:32 am
Contact:

Re: When to claim Social Security: two reasons not to wait

Post by ObliviousInvestor » Thu Dec 27, 2018 6:48 pm

jeffyscott wrote:
Thu Dec 27, 2018 6:16 pm
I saw that 82.5% at one of your links. Does that mean if I claimed at 62, which for me would mean I get 70% of PIA, that my spouse would still get a total benefit equal to 82.5% of my PIA upon my demise? (Assume that my spouse's own benefit is much less than 82.5% of my PIA)
Yes, if they wait until their survivor FRA to file for survivor benefits.
Mike Piper, author/blogger

delamer
Posts: 6707
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2011 6:13 pm

Re: When to claim Social Security: two reasons not to wait

Post by delamer » Thu Dec 27, 2018 6:56 pm

ObliviousInvestor wrote:
Thu Dec 27, 2018 6:47 pm
jeffyscott wrote:
Thu Dec 27, 2018 6:05 pm
ObliviousInvestor wrote:
Thu Dec 27, 2018 5:43 pm
If the deceased had not yet filed, and the surviving spouse waits until his/her survivor FRA to file for survivor benefits, the total monthly benefit the surviving spouse would receive would be the deceased's PIA (if he/she died prior to FRA) or the amount the deceased would have received if he/she had filed on date of death (if he/she died after FRA).
So if I (FRA 67) as the higher earner die at 60, my spouse would get no increase in survivor benefit by delaying beyond the date at which I would've turned 67? And if I die at 68, then there is no increase in benefit for any delay?

If I have understood correctly, this means, spouse should generally file for survivor benefit by the later of the date deceased would've reached FRA or the date of death.
Your surviving spouse would get no increase in survivor benefit by delaying beyond the date at which they reach their survivor FRA. If the surviving spouse files for survivor benefits prior to FRA, there is a reduction in such benefits.
To clarify, this is true in the specific scenario above where the higher earner dies at age 60?

User avatar
ObliviousInvestor
Posts: 3477
Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 9:32 am
Contact:

Re: When to claim Social Security: two reasons not to wait

Post by ObliviousInvestor » Thu Dec 27, 2018 7:23 pm

delamer wrote:
Thu Dec 27, 2018 6:56 pm
ObliviousInvestor wrote:
Thu Dec 27, 2018 6:47 pm
jeffyscott wrote:
Thu Dec 27, 2018 6:05 pm
ObliviousInvestor wrote:
Thu Dec 27, 2018 5:43 pm
If the deceased had not yet filed, and the surviving spouse waits until his/her survivor FRA to file for survivor benefits, the total monthly benefit the surviving spouse would receive would be the deceased's PIA (if he/she died prior to FRA) or the amount the deceased would have received if he/she had filed on date of death (if he/she died after FRA).
So if I (FRA 67) as the higher earner die at 60, my spouse would get no increase in survivor benefit by delaying beyond the date at which I would've turned 67? And if I die at 68, then there is no increase in benefit for any delay?

If I have understood correctly, this means, spouse should generally file for survivor benefit by the later of the date deceased would've reached FRA or the date of death.
Your surviving spouse would get no increase in survivor benefit by delaying beyond the date at which they reach their survivor FRA. If the surviving spouse files for survivor benefits prior to FRA, there is a reduction in such benefits.
To clarify, this is true in the specific scenario above where the higher earner dies at age 60?
It is always true that:
1) if the surviving spouse files for survivor benefits prior to their survivor FRA, that survivor benefit will be reduced due to early filing, and
2) a survivor benefit does not receive any increase for the surviving spouse waiting beyond their survivor FRA to file for it.
Mike Piper, author/blogger

delamer
Posts: 6707
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2011 6:13 pm

Re: When to claim Social Security: two reasons not to wait

Post by delamer » Thu Dec 27, 2018 7:57 pm

ObliviousInvestor wrote:
Thu Dec 27, 2018 7:23 pm
delamer wrote:
Thu Dec 27, 2018 6:56 pm
ObliviousInvestor wrote:
Thu Dec 27, 2018 6:47 pm
jeffyscott wrote:
Thu Dec 27, 2018 6:05 pm
ObliviousInvestor wrote:
Thu Dec 27, 2018 5:43 pm
If the deceased had not yet filed, and the surviving spouse waits until his/her survivor FRA to file for survivor benefits, the total monthly benefit the surviving spouse would receive would be the deceased's PIA (if he/she died prior to FRA) or the amount the deceased would have received if he/she had filed on date of death (if he/she died after FRA).
So if I (FRA 67) as the higher earner die at 60, my spouse would get no increase in survivor benefit by delaying beyond the date at which I would've turned 67? And if I die at 68, then there is no increase in benefit for any delay?

If I have understood correctly, this means, spouse should generally file for survivor benefit by the later of the date deceased would've reached FRA or the date of death.
Your surviving spouse would get no increase in survivor benefit by delaying beyond the date at which they reach their survivor FRA. If the surviving spouse files for survivor benefits prior to FRA, there is a reduction in such benefits.
To clarify, this is true in the specific scenario above where the higher earner dies at age 60?
It is always true that:
1) if the surviving spouse files for survivor benefits prior to their survivor FRA, that survivor benefit will be reduced due to early filing, and
2) a survivor benefit does not receive any increase for the surviving spouse waiting beyond their survivor FRA to file for it.
Say my spouse has a benefit of $2000 per month, based on claiming at 65. My FRA is 66 (PIA of $1,000).

He dies at 68, when I am 65. I claim my survivor’s benefit immediately.

Then the $2000 would be reduced because I am under my FRA?

TravelforFun
Posts: 1590
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2012 11:05 pm

Re: When to claim Social Security: two reasons not to wait

Post by TravelforFun » Thu Dec 27, 2018 8:17 pm

David Jay wrote:
Mon May 14, 2018 6:15 pm
jeffyscott wrote:
Mon May 14, 2018 5:25 pm
David Jay wrote:
Mon May 14, 2018 3:52 pm
JoeRetire wrote:
Sun May 13, 2018 7:52 am
(Full disclosure: I'm 64 and my wife is 63 this year. We are planning to both wait until 70 to start our benefits. We still have 6-7 years to change our minds. No matter what, we intend to be happy.)
Joe:

I would take a good look at the numbers if the lower-earning spouse takes SS at FRA (likely 66 for you two) and higher earner waits until 70. There is no impact on survivor's benefit (survivor's benefit is the higher earner's benefit) and yields 4 years of additional benefits at the rate of the lower-earning spouse.
That is the case even if lower earning spouse takes it at 62, isn't it?
Yes it is.

Spousal (if lower earning spouse qualifies) is reduced if filing before FRA, which is our case. That may have been what I was thinking, good catch.
Be careful. If you're born after Jan 1, 1954, you can't restrict your application to just spousal. When you file, you will automatically be deemed to be filing for all benefits for which you are eligible.

TravelforFun

Post Reply