[Dr. Seuss describes the Bogleheads via ChatGPT]

[winterescape]

Just for fun, I asked Chat GPT, in the manner of Dr Seuss, describe the Bogleheads....



In a land not so far, where the numbers all play,
Lived the Bogleheads bright, in a frugal ballet.
With their index funds dancing, and portfolios neat,
They shared wisdom and knowledge, making savings a treat.

“Invest with a plan!” they’d cheer with delight,
“No need for the fuss, just keep it polite!
With low costs and patience, your wealth will expand,
Follow the path that John Bogle had planned.”

They spoke of the markets, both wobbly and wise,
With charts and with graphs, they opened our eyes.
“Don’t chase after fads, let the long term be your guide,
With a diversified basket, you’ll enjoy the ride!”

So if you’re unsure, and your head's in a spin,
Join the Bogleheads crew, let the journey begin.
With their friendly advice and a mantra so grand,
You’ll find peace in your finances, just take a stand!

[title edited by admin Alex]

[Youngblood]

Well, it was a fun read.

Thanks

[Catalina25]

That is awesome!

[LateStarter1975]

Just for fun, I asked Chat GPT, in the manner of Dr Seuss, describe the Bogleheads....



In a land not so far, where the numbers all play,
Lived the Bogleheads bright, in a frugal ballet.
With their index funds dancing, and portfolios neat,
They shared wisdom and knowledge, making savings a treat.

“Invest with a plan!” they’d cheer with delight,
“No need for the fuss, just keep it polite!
With low costs and patience, your wealth will expand,
Follow the path that John Bogle had planned.”

They spoke of the markets, both wobbly and wise,
With charts and with graphs, they opened our eyes.
“Don’t chase after fads, let the long term be your guide,
With a diversified basket, you’ll enjoy the ride!”

So if you’re unsure, and your head's in a spin,
Join the Bogleheads crew, let the journey begin.
With their friendly advice and a mantra so grand,
You’ll find peace in your finances, just take a stand!

That is so neat....

[Fallible]

Why ask a machine to imitate a human?

[Misenplace]

This thread is now in the Community forum. It is off topic for Personal Consumers forum; indeed, it is off topic for any of the forums beginning with "Personal" since it is not personable nor actionable. Since it is of interest to the community, I've moved it here.

Moderator Misenplace

[doobiedoo]

Why ask a machine to imitate a human?

Because a machine can mimic a human better than another human.

[Tamalak]

Why ask a machine to imitate a human?

Same reason as asking a machine to imitate a bird (airplane), or a horse (car) or a fire (lightbulb). Machines have unique qualities that shine out when we try them in different roles.

[Doctor Rhythm]

Neat! With the next bear market, please ask it to imitate the style of Edgar Allan Poe.

[Fallible]

Why ask a machine to imitate a human?

Same reason as asking a machine to imitate a bird (airplane), or a horse (car) or a fire (lightbulb). Machines have unique qualities that shine out when we try them in different roles.

Maybe I read the OP wrong, but the topic seems to be about imitation, not uniqueness. The machine was asked to describe the Bogleheads "in the manner of Dr Seuss."

[noupdjm]

Very entertaining. And a bit scary . . .

[TheTimeLord]

Just for fun, I asked Chat GPT, in the manner of Dr Seuss, describe the Bogleheads....



In a land not so far, where the numbers all play,
Lived the Bogleheads bright, in a frugal ballet.
With their index funds dancing, and portfolios neat,
They shared wisdom and knowledge, making savings a treat.

“Invest with a plan!” they’d cheer with delight,
“No need for the fuss, just keep it polite!
With low costs and patience, your wealth will expand,
Follow the path that John Bogle had planned.”

They spoke of the markets, both wobbly and wise,
With charts and with graphs, they opened our eyes.
“Don’t chase after fads, let the long term be your guide,
With a diversified basket, you’ll enjoy the ride!”

So if you’re unsure, and your head's in a spin,
Join the Bogleheads crew, let the journey begin.
With their friendly advice and a mantra so grand,
You’ll find peace in your finances, just take a stand!

In a land not so far, where the numbers do dance,
Live the Bogleheads bright, in a frugal finance.
With index funds twirling, and portfolios neat,
They share wisdom and knowledge, a financial treat.

**They live below means**, oh, they know it’s quite wise,
To spend less than you earn—what a marvelous prize!
With savings a-plenty, they build up their stash,
Investing with patience, not rushing for cash.

**They start investing early**, it’s never too late,
For the magic of compounding can open the gate.
“Invest often!” they cheer, “Let your money grow tall!
In the market’s grand dance, you can have it all!”

But beware of the risks that may lead you astray,
For too much excitement can lead you away.
“Stay steady!” they chant, “Through the ups and the downs,
Keep your eyes on the prize; don’t let fear wear you frowns!”

With low-cost investments, they’re savvy and smart,
Avoiding high fees is just how they start.
In 401(k)s and IRAs too,
They find ways to save that are clever and true.

So if you’re unsure of your financial quest,
Join the Bogleheads’ forum; it's truly the best!
With tips and great tricks from this wise little crew,
You’ll find that investing can be fun for you too!

Citations:
[1] https://thecollegeinvestor.com/4119/boglehead/
[2] https://www.drseussart.com/illustration-art-description
[3] viewtopic.php?start=500&t=65332
[4] viewtopic.php?t=232352
[5] viewtopic.php?t=440026
[6] viewtopic.php?t=128396
[7] https://reimaginingmigration.org/resour ... -cartoons/
[8] viewtopic.php?t=168087

[Longdog]

And in the style of Larry David:

Alright, picture this: a bunch of people obsessed with investing, but not in a flashy, "Wolf of Wall Street" kind of way. No, these folks are, like, *really* into low-cost index funds. That’s right—index funds! The thing that makes you yawn just hearing about it.

They call themselves *Bogleheads*, which, first of all, sounds like some kind of weird cult. But instead of chanting or sacrificing goats, they’re sitting around reading tax laws and calculating expense ratios. And they *love* this stuff! They worship this guy, Jack Bogle, who founded Vanguard. He’s like their Moses—parted the seas of Wall Street greed and gave them the commandments of... low fees and diversification.

And you know what? They’re smug about it! Yeah, they act like they’ve cracked some secret code of investing. Like, “Oh, you’re buying individual stocks? What are you, a caveman? Enjoy your capital gains taxes!” Meanwhile, they’ve got these 3-fund portfolios, sitting there like it’s the Holy Grail of financial security. It's simple, they say. *Simplicity!* Which, of course, is their way of saying, "I’m better than you because I don’t have to try."

But hey, they’re not flashy! They’re not day-trading or buying meme stocks. Oh no, they’re playing the *long* game. Real long. I’m talking decades. They’ve got patience like a monk, but with spreadsheets. And don’t even think about mentioning active management around them—oh no, to them that’s blasphemy. You’re better off saying you never floss.

In the end, you gotta respect them. They’ve got discipline, they’ve got humility, and they’ve got their eye on the prize—retiring comfortably with low fees. But the smugness? Eh, I could do without that.

[TheTimeLord]

Describe the Bogleheads in the Matrix (by Perplexity.ai)

The Bogleheads investment philosophy does not have any direct connection to the Matrix film franchise. However, I can describe some key aspects of the Bogleheads approach using metaphors inspired by the Matrix:

## The "Real World" of Investing

Just as Neo awakens to the true nature of reality in the Matrix, Bogleheads aim to see through the illusions and marketing hype of the financial industry. They focus on:

- **Unplugging from active management**: Bogleheads reject the idea that professional stock pickers can consistently beat the market[1].

- **Seeing the code**: They understand that low costs, broad diversification, and long-term discipline are the true drivers of investment success[2].

## The "Agents" of Wall Street

Like the agents in the Matrix, Bogleheads view many financial professionals as potential threats to their wealth:

- **Avoiding brokers**: Bogleheads are wary of expensive stockbrokers and their hidden fees[1].

- **Resisting market timing**: They don't try to predict or time the market, viewing it as a dangerous illusion[2].

## "The One" - John Bogle

John Bogle, the founder of Vanguard, plays a role similar to Morpheus:

- **Showing the path**: Bogle's principles of low-cost index investing form the core of Boglehead philosophy[1][2].

- **Simplicity as strength**: Bogle emphasized that simplicity is the key to financial success[2].

## The Boglehead "Crew"

Like the crew of the Nebuchadnezzar, Bogleheads support each other:

- **Community wisdom**: They share knowledge and experiences on forums and in local chapters[3].

- **Staying the course**: Bogleheads encourage each other to maintain discipline during market turbulence[2].

## The "Program" for Success

Bogleheads follow a simple but powerful investment program:

- **The Three-Fund Portfolio**: Many Bogleheads use a straightforward mix of total stock market, international stock, and bond index funds[1].

- **Asset allocation**: They adjust their stock/bond mix based on their risk tolerance and stage of life[2].

By following these principles, Bogleheads aim to "free their minds" from the complexities and pitfalls of the financial matrix, achieving long-term investing success through simplicity and discipline.

Citations:
[1] https://thephysicianphilosopher.com/the ... portfolio/
[2] https://www.bogleheads.org/wiki/Boglehe ... philosophy
[3] https://boglecenter.net/bogleheads-on-i ... pisode-73/
[4] https://boglecenter.net/bogleheads-chap ... ike-piper/
[5] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VurvQ5yhNwo
[6] viewtopic.php?t=386520
[7] viewtopic.php?t=369461
[8] https://www.reddit.com/r/Bogleheads/com ... s_towards/

[TheTimeLord]

Describe Bogleheads Philosophy in terms of Star Wars characters and the force (by Perplexity.ai)


The Bogleheads investment philosophy can be creatively described using Star Wars characters and concepts related to the Force:

## The Jedi Council of Investing

The Bogleheads approach is akin to the wisdom of the Jedi Council, offering time-tested principles for navigating the complex galaxy of investing[2].

**John Bogle as Yoda**: Just as Yoda guided young Jedi, John Bogle, the founder of Vanguard, serves as the wise master of the Bogleheads philosophy. His teachings emphasize simplicity and balance in investing, much like Yoda's lessons on the Force[2].

**The Force as Market Forces**: The Force in Star Wars "surrounds us and penetrates us. It binds the galaxy together"[1]. Similarly, the Bogleheads view market forces as an all-encompassing power that influences investment outcomes. They teach investors to harness these forces rather than fight against them.

## Jedi Principles of Investing

**Balance in Asset Allocation**: Like the Jedi seek balance in the Force, Bogleheads emphasize the importance of a balanced asset allocation between stocks and bonds. This balance helps investors weather the dark side of market volatility[2].

**Simplicity as a Lightsaber**: John Bogle's mantra "Simplicity is the master key to financial success" can be likened to a Jedi's lightsaber – a powerful yet elegantly simple tool. The three-fund portfolio exemplifies this principle, providing a straightforward approach to investing[2].

**Mindfulness of Risk**: Jedi are taught to be mindful of their surroundings and potential dangers. Similarly, Bogleheads emphasize understanding and managing risk in investing. They advise investors to "never bear too much or too little risk," much like a Jedi balancing their use of the Force[2].

## The Dark Side of Investing

**Avoiding the Sith Lords of Wall Street**: Just as the Jedi resist the temptations of the dark side, Bogleheads warn against the allure of complex, high-fee investment products pushed by the "Sith Lords" of Wall Street. They advocate for low-cost index funds as a way to resist these dark forces[2].

**Patience and Discipline**: Like Luke Skywalker learning to control his emotions and master the Force, Bogleheads emphasize the importance of patience and discipline in investing. They advise against making rash decisions based on fear or greed, which can lead to the dark side of poor investment outcomes[2].

In conclusion, the Bogleheads philosophy, much like the Jedi way, offers a path to financial wisdom through simplicity, balance, and a deep understanding of the forces at play in the investment universe. May the Force of sound investing be with you!

Citations:
[1] https://www.newidentitymagazine.com/liv ... the-force/
[2] https://www.bogleheads.org/wiki/Boglehe ... philosophy
[3] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AlUVIrkfcr0
[4] https://forum.rebelscum.com/threads/sta ... hy.893585/
[5] https://sergeyilyn.com/star-wars-philosophy-3/
[6] https://www.reddit.com/r/StarWarsEU/com ... _you_find/
[7] viewtopic.php?start=250&t=147398

[winterescape]

Just for fun, I asked Chat GPT, in the manner of Dr Seuss, describe the Bogleheads....



In a land not so far, where the numbers all play,
Lived the Bogleheads bright, in a frugal ballet.
With their index funds dancing, and portfolios neat,
They shared wisdom and knowledge, making savings a treat.

“Invest with a plan!” they’d cheer with delight,
“No need for the fuss, just keep it polite!
With low costs and patience, your wealth will expand,
Follow the path that John Bogle had planned.”

They spoke of the markets, both wobbly and wise,
With charts and with graphs, they opened our eyes.
“Don’t chase after fads, let the long term be your guide,
With a diversified basket, you’ll enjoy the ride!”

So if you’re unsure, and your head's in a spin,
Join the Bogleheads crew, let the journey begin.
With their friendly advice and a mantra so grand,
You’ll find peace in your finances, just take a stand!

In a land not so far, where the numbers do dance,
Live the Bogleheads bright, in a frugal finance.
With index funds twirling, and portfolios neat,
They share wisdom and knowledge, a financial treat.

**They live below means**, oh, they know it’s quite wise,
To spend less than you earn—what a marvelous prize!
With savings a-plenty, they build up their stash,
Investing with patience, not rushing for cash.

**They start investing early**, it’s never too late,
For the magic of compounding can open the gate.
“Invest often!” they cheer, “Let your money grow tall!
In the market’s grand dance, you can have it all!”

But beware of the risks that may lead you astray,
For too much excitement can lead you away.
“Stay steady!” they chant, “Through the ups and the downs,
Keep your eyes on the prize; don’t let fear wear you frowns!”

With low-cost investments, they’re savvy and smart,
Avoiding high fees is just how they start.
In 401(k)s and IRAs too,
They find ways to save that are clever and true.

So if you’re unsure of your financial quest,
Join the Bogleheads’ forum; it's truly the best!
With tips and great tricks from this wise little crew,
You’ll find that investing can be fun for you too!

Citations:
[1] https://thecollegeinvestor.com/4119/boglehead/
[2] https://www.drseussart.com/illustration-art-description
[3] viewtopic.php?start=500&t=65332
[4] viewtopic.php?t=232352
[5] viewtopic.php?t=440026
[6] viewtopic.php?t=128396
[7] https://reimaginingmigration.org/resour ... -cartoons/
[8] viewtopic.php?t=168087

Much improved, nice!

[arcticpineapplecorp.]

And in the style of Larry David:

Alright, picture this: a bunch of people obsessed with investing, but not in a flashy, "Wolf of Wall Street" kind of way. No, these folks are, like, *really* into low-cost index funds. That’s right—index funds! The thing that makes you yawn just hearing about it.

They call themselves *Bogleheads*, which, first of all, sounds like some kind of weird cult. But instead of chanting or sacrificing goats, they’re sitting around reading tax laws and calculating expense ratios. And they *love* this stuff! They worship this guy, Jack Bogle, who founded Vanguard. He’s like their Moses—parted the seas of Wall Street greed and gave them the commandments of... low fees and diversification.

And you know what? They’re smug about it! Yeah, they act like they’ve cracked some secret code of investing. Like, “Oh, you’re buying individual stocks? What are you, a caveman? Enjoy your capital gains taxes!” Meanwhile, they’ve got these 3-fund portfolios, sitting there like it’s the Holy Grail of financial security. It's simple, they say. *Simplicity!* Which, of course, is their way of saying, "I’m better than you because I don’t have to try."

But hey, they’re not flashy! They’re not day-trading or buying meme stocks. Oh no, they’re playing the *long* game. Real long. I’m talking decades. They’ve got patience like a monk, but with spreadsheets. And don’t even think about mentioning active management around them—oh no, to them that’s blasphemy. You’re better off saying you never floss.

In the end, you gotta respect them. They’ve got discipline, they’ve got humility, and they’ve got their eye on the prize—retiring comfortably with low fees. But the smugness? Eh, I could do without that.

this was good. did you write it or did chatgpt?

[Longdog]

And in the style of Larry David:

Alright, picture this: a bunch of people obsessed with investing, but not in a flashy, "Wolf of Wall Street" kind of way. No, these folks are, like, *really* into low-cost index funds. That’s right—index funds! The thing that makes you yawn just hearing about it.

They call themselves *Bogleheads*, which, first of all, sounds like some kind of weird cult. But instead of chanting or sacrificing goats, they’re sitting around reading tax laws and calculating expense ratios. And they *love* this stuff! They worship this guy, Jack Bogle, who founded Vanguard. He’s like their Moses—parted the seas of Wall Street greed and gave them the commandments of... low fees and diversification.

And you know what? They’re smug about it! Yeah, they act like they’ve cracked some secret code of investing. Like, “Oh, you’re buying individual stocks? What are you, a caveman? Enjoy your capital gains taxes!” Meanwhile, they’ve got these 3-fund portfolios, sitting there like it’s the Holy Grail of financial security. It's simple, they say. *Simplicity!* Which, of course, is their way of saying, "I’m better than you because I don’t have to try."

But hey, they’re not flashy! They’re not day-trading or buying meme stocks. Oh no, they’re playing the *long* game. Real long. I’m talking decades. They’ve got patience like a monk, but with spreadsheets. And don’t even think about mentioning active management around them—oh no, to them that’s blasphemy. You’re better off saying you never floss.

In the end, you gotta respect them. They’ve got discipline, they’ve got humility, and they’ve got their eye on the prize—retiring comfortably with low fees. But the smugness? Eh, I could do without that.

this was good. did you write it or did chatgpt?

ChatGPT wrote it, in all of 5 seconds or less. (Both amazing and terrifying, simultaneously.) I thought it was funny and spot-on. Could definitely hear him actually saying (er... whining about) it.

[AnnetteLouisan]

And in the style of Larry David:

Alright, picture this: a bunch of people obsessed with investing, but not in a flashy, "Wolf of Wall Street" kind of way. No, these folks are, like, *really* into low-cost index funds. That’s right—index funds! The thing that makes you yawn just hearing about it.

They call themselves *Bogleheads*, which, first of all, sounds like some kind of weird cult. But instead of chanting or sacrificing goats, they’re sitting around reading tax laws and calculating expense ratios. And they *love* this stuff! They worship this guy, Jack Bogle, who founded Vanguard. He’s like their Moses—parted the seas of Wall Street greed and gave them the commandments of... low fees and diversification.

And you know what? They’re smug about it! Yeah, they act like they’ve cracked some secret code of investing. Like, “Oh, you’re buying individual stocks? What are you, a caveman? Enjoy your capital gains taxes!” Meanwhile, they’ve got these 3-fund portfolios, sitting there like it’s the Holy Grail of financial security. It's simple, they say. *Simplicity!* Which, of course, is their way of saying, "I’m better than you because I don’t have to try."

But hey, they’re not flashy! They’re not day-trading or buying meme stocks. Oh no, they’re playing the *long* game. Real long. I’m talking decades. They’ve got patience like a monk, but with spreadsheets. And don’t even think about mentioning active management around them—oh no, to them that’s blasphemy. You’re better off saying you never floss.

In the end, you gotta respect them. They’ve got discipline, they’ve got humility, and they’ve got their eye on the prize—retiring comfortably with low fees. But the smugness? Eh, I could do without that.

this was good. did you write it or did chatgpt?

ChatGPT wrote it, in all of 5 seconds or less. (Both amazing and terrifying, simultaneously.) I thought it was funny and spot-on. Could definitely hear him actually saying (er... whining about) it.

Would you ask it please to describe Bogleheads in the style of Tom Wolfe?

[Longdog]

Would you ask it please to describe Bogleheads in the style of Tom Wolfe?

You got it:

Ah, the Bogleheads! That most curious tribe of the modern financial landscape, the Vanguardians of thrift and the ascetics of asset allocation. Imagine, if you will, a congregation of the plain-clothed, cardigan-draped adherents to the gospel of John C. Bogle, a man whose surname—*Bogle*—bounces off the tongue like a strange, utilitarian dance step, fitting for this peculiar sect of investors who shun the very idea of speculation with all the fervor of the Puritans rejecting the corruptions of old Europe.

These Bogleheads, they are the Calvinists of capital. Their doctrine? Simplicity! Their creed? Low costs! Oh, how they extol the virtues of that banal, pedestrian creation: the *index fund*! A financial instrument that, in its glorious mundanity, strips away the gaudy excesses of Wall Street’s wizards and rogues. No, no—no flash, no bang, no high-octane, bespoke hedge funds for these denizens of fiscal probity. They are the foot soldiers in a revolution against the ancien régime of fat fees and arcane stock-picking strategies. They march lockstep, heads down, not into battle, but into retirement.

And oh, how they love that three-fund portfolio! It is their mantra, their meditation: one part domestic stock, one part international, and, to top it off, a little pinch of bonds. Like the delicate balance of an architect’s blueprint, so simple, so *ineffably elegant*, they would say. But beneath that facade of simplicity, make no mistake, lies a zealous dedication to the minutiae of personal finance that would make even the most ardent actuary blush.

They thumb their noses at the Wall Street darlings—the hedge fund managers, the high-flying traders in their bespoke suits—men (and let us be clear, always men!) who command the headlines and the talking heads of CNBC. But not the Bogleheads. They slink away from that glare of wealth’s vulgar spectacle, choosing instead the righteous path of *passivity*—ah, yes, *passive investing*, a method by which they stake their claim not on bold predictions, but on the belief that the market itself is the only oracle worth heeding.

And so they plot their slow, inevitable accumulation of wealth, not with the reckless abandon of the day trader, but with the measured, unhurried steps of a marathoner, confident that in the end, the tortoise shall prevail over the hare.

In their modesty, in their monastic devotion to compound interest and low expense ratios, these Bogleheads have created not just a method of investing, but a way of life, a way of thinking—a worldview built not on ambition or avarice, but on the quiet triumph of *restraint.*

[Longdog]

Would you ask it please to describe Bogleheads in the style of Tom Wolfe?

And now, in the style of Dick Wolf, creator of Law & Order :


*In the financial world, reckless investors chase high returns and fast money. But there’s another group that takes a different approach. These are their stories.* **DUN DUN!**

**INT. CONFERENCE ROOM – DAY**

*Detectives FINANCE and DIVERSIFICATION sit across from a suspect, wearing an old “Vanguard” sweatshirt, nervously clutching a portfolio statement.*

**DET. FINANCE**
(leans forward)
You want to explain this? Three funds? No active management? No individual stocks? What’s the angle here, buddy?

**SUSPECT**
(shakes head)
There’s no angle. I’m a Boglehead. We don’t play that game. We stick to low-cost index funds. It’s… it’s the only way.

**DET. DIVERSIFICATION**
(snorts)
Oh yeah? The “Boglehead way,” huh? Sounds like you’re just trying to hide something. You’re telling me you never chase returns?

**SUSPECT**
(firmly)
No. We don’t speculate. We don’t pick stocks. We invest in the *whole market* for the long haul. It’s about *time in the market*, not timing the market.

**DET. FINANCE**
(slams folder on the table)
So you’re telling me that while other investors are out there gambling with their life savings, buying up tech stocks, crypto, you just… sit back? Do nothing? How do you even sleep at night?

**SUSPECT**
(calmly)
We sleep just fine. Low risk, low fees. We trust in the market’s historical performance. Look, I’m not the criminal here. It’s the active managers who are charging 2% fees and making a killing while clients eat the losses.

*Detectives exchange glances. They know the suspect’s got a point. They don’t like it.*

**DET. DIVERSIFICATION**
(sighs)
Alright, let’s say you’re telling the truth. What about the *FIRE movement*? You involved in that, too?

**SUSPECT**
(smirks)
FIRE? Yeah, I know those guys. Financial Independence, Retire Early. Some of them are Bogleheads, but me? I’m just trying to retire on time, with my portfolio intact.

**DET. FINANCE**
(nods)
Alright. Looks like you’re free to go… for now. But if we find you chasing returns, buying meme stocks, or—God forbid—getting into day trading, we’ll be back.

*SUSPECT stands, grabbing his folder with a quiet sense of satisfaction. He walks out, cool and collected.*

**DET. DIVERSIFICATION**
(to FINANCE)
What do you think? You buy this whole “index funds” thing?

**DET. FINANCE**
(sighs)
I don’t like it. Too boring. But… it checks out. These Bogleheads… they’re not breaking the law. They’re just playing a different game.

*The detectives walk out, shaking their heads, as the screen fades to black.*

**Narrator (V.O.)**
*In the financial system, investing is represented by two separate but equally important groups: the speculators, who chase high returns, and the Bogleheads, who choose passive strategies for the long haul. These are their stories.* **DUN DUN!**

[protagonist]

And in the style of Larry David:

Alright, picture this: a bunch of people obsessed with investing, but not in a flashy, "Wolf of Wall Street" kind of way. No, these folks are, like, *really* into low-cost index funds. That’s right—index funds! The thing that makes you yawn just hearing about it.

They call themselves *Bogleheads*, which, first of all, sounds like some kind of weird cult. But instead of chanting or sacrificing goats, they’re sitting around reading tax laws and calculating expense ratios. And they *love* this stuff! They worship this guy, Jack Bogle, who founded Vanguard. He’s like their Moses—parted the seas of Wall Street greed and gave them the commandments of... low fees and diversification.

And you know what? They’re smug about it! Yeah, they act like they’ve cracked some secret code of investing. Like, “Oh, you’re buying individual stocks? What are you, a caveman? Enjoy your capital gains taxes!” Meanwhile, they’ve got these 3-fund portfolios, sitting there like it’s the Holy Grail of financial security. It's simple, they say. *Simplicity!* Which, of course, is their way of saying, "I’m better than you because I don’t have to try."

But hey, they’re not flashy! They’re not day-trading or buying meme stocks. Oh no, they’re playing the *long* game. Real long. I’m talking decades. They’ve got patience like a monk, but with spreadsheets. And don’t even think about mentioning active management around them—oh no, to them that’s blasphemy. You’re better off saying you never floss.

In the end, you gotta respect them. They’ve got discipline, they’ve got humility, and they’ve got their eye on the prize—retiring comfortably with low fees. But the smugness? Eh, I could do without that.

*laughing*

[AnnetteLouisan]

Both are priceless! Thank you.

[Fallible]

And in the style of Larry David:

Alright, picture this: a bunch of people obsessed with investing, but not in a flashy, "Wolf of Wall Street" kind of way. No, these folks are, like, *really* into low-cost index funds. That’s right—index funds! The thing that makes you yawn just hearing about it.

They call themselves *Bogleheads*, which, first of all, sounds like some kind of weird cult. But instead of chanting or sacrificing goats, they’re sitting around reading tax laws and calculating expense ratios. And they *love* this stuff! They worship this guy, Jack Bogle, who founded Vanguard. He’s like their Moses—parted the seas of Wall Street greed and gave them the commandments of... low fees and diversification.

And you know what? They’re smug about it! Yeah, they act like they’ve cracked some secret code of investing. Like, “Oh, you’re buying individual stocks? What are you, a caveman? Enjoy your capital gains taxes!” Meanwhile, they’ve got these 3-fund portfolios, sitting there like it’s the Holy Grail of financial security. It's simple, they say. *Simplicity!* Which, of course, is their way of saying, "I’m better than you because I don’t have to try."

But hey, they’re not flashy! They’re not day-trading or buying meme stocks. Oh no, they’re playing the *long* game. Real long. I’m talking decades. They’ve got patience like a monk, but with spreadsheets. And don’t even think about mentioning active management around them—oh no, to them that’s blasphemy. You’re better off saying you never floss.

In the end, you gotta respect them. They’ve got discipline, they’ve got humility, and they’ve got their eye on the prize—retiring comfortably with low fees. But the smugness? Eh, I could do without that.

this was good. did you write it or did chatgpt?

ChatGPT wrote it, in all of 5 seconds or less. (Both amazing and terrifying, simultaneously.) I thought it was funny and spot-on. Could definitely hear him actually saying (er... whining about) it.

Given what we have by now learned (hopefully) about these bots, then what they can do in 5 seconds or 1 second is hardly amazing and what can be terrifying is the human reaction to it, not just being at least initially impressed with the speed, but the supposed quality and believability of the reply. I know we are aware of the importance of the prompt, how it can influence the response, and how in this case and others here we don't always know what the prompt was, e.g., what biases might have gone into it, and it's something we should know in order to meaningfully judge the replies. This thread is only about asking the bot to do imitations and some of its responses have been entertaining, but no reason to be wowed.

[protagonist]

And in the style of Larry David:

Alright, picture this: a bunch of people obsessed with investing, but not in a flashy, "Wolf of Wall Street" kind of way. No, these folks are, like, *really* into low-cost index funds. That’s right—index funds! The thing that makes you yawn just hearing about it.

They call themselves *Bogleheads*, which, first of all, sounds like some kind of weird cult. But instead of chanting or sacrificing goats, they’re sitting around reading tax laws and calculating expense ratios. And they *love* this stuff! They worship this guy, Jack Bogle, who founded Vanguard. He’s like their Moses—parted the seas of Wall Street greed and gave them the commandments of... low fees and diversification.

And you know what? They’re smug about it! Yeah, they act like they’ve cracked some secret code of investing. Like, “Oh, you’re buying individual stocks? What are you, a caveman? Enjoy your capital gains taxes!” Meanwhile, they’ve got these 3-fund portfolios, sitting there like it’s the Holy Grail of financial security. It's simple, they say. *Simplicity!* Which, of course, is their way of saying, "I’m better than you because I don’t have to try."

But hey, they’re not flashy! They’re not day-trading or buying meme stocks. Oh no, they’re playing the *long* game. Real long. I’m talking decades. They’ve got patience like a monk, but with spreadsheets. And don’t even think about mentioning active management around them—oh no, to them that’s blasphemy. You’re better off saying you never floss.

In the end, you gotta respect them. They’ve got discipline, they’ve got humility, and they’ve got their eye on the prize—retiring comfortably with low fees. But the smugness? Eh, I could do without that.

this was good. did you write it or did chatgpt?

ChatGPT wrote it, in all of 5 seconds or less. (Both amazing and terrifying, simultaneously.) I thought it was funny and spot-on. Could definitely hear him actually saying (er... whining about) it.

Given what we have by now learned (hopefully) about these bots, then what they can do in 5 seconds or 1 second is hardly amazing and what can be terrifying is the human reaction to it, not just being at least initially impressed with the speed, but the supposed quality and believability of the reply. I know we are aware of the importance of the prompt, how it can influence the response, and how in this case and others here we don't always know what the prompt was, e.g., what biases might have gone into it, and it's something we should know in order to meaningfully judge the replies. This thread is only about asking the bot to do imitations and some of its responses have been entertaining, but no reason to be wowed.

I'm definitely wowed, especially given the state of the art only a few years ago.
Other things I have been seeing re: the rapid progress of AI over the past few months wow me much more (impressed and fearful).
This was just done for fun. For retired people on the sidelines it is just a play toy. Not so for others.

[yankees60]

All have been excellent. Keep them coming!

[Fallible]

And in the style of Larry David:

Alright, picture this: a bunch of people obsessed with investing, but not in a flashy, "Wolf of Wall Street" kind of way. No, these folks are, like, *really* into low-cost index funds. That’s right—index funds! The thing that makes you yawn just hearing about it.

They call themselves *Bogleheads*, which, first of all, sounds like some kind of weird cult. But instead of chanting or sacrificing goats, they’re sitting around reading tax laws and calculating expense ratios. And they *love* this stuff! They worship this guy, Jack Bogle, who founded Vanguard. He’s like their Moses—parted the seas of Wall Street greed and gave them the commandments of... low fees and diversification.

And you know what? They’re smug about it! Yeah, they act like they’ve cracked some secret code of investing. Like, “Oh, you’re buying individual stocks? What are you, a caveman? Enjoy your capital gains taxes!” Meanwhile, they’ve got these 3-fund portfolios, sitting there like it’s the Holy Grail of financial security. It's simple, they say. *Simplicity!* Which, of course, is their way of saying, "I’m better than you because I don’t have to try."

But hey, they’re not flashy! They’re not day-trading or buying meme stocks. Oh no, they’re playing the *long* game. Real long. I’m talking decades. They’ve got patience like a monk, but with spreadsheets. And don’t even think about mentioning active management around them—oh no, to them that’s blasphemy. You’re better off saying you never floss.

In the end, you gotta respect them. They’ve got discipline, they’ve got humility, and they’ve got their eye on the prize—retiring comfortably with low fees. But the smugness? Eh, I could do without that.

this was good. did you write it or did chatgpt?

ChatGPT wrote it, in all of 5 seconds or less. (Both amazing and terrifying, simultaneously.) I thought it was funny and spot-on. Could definitely hear him actually saying (er... whining about) it.

Given what we have by now learned (hopefully) about these bots, then what they can do in 5 seconds or 1 second is hardly amazing and what can be terrifying is the human reaction to it, not just being at least initially impressed with the speed, but the supposed quality and believability of the reply. I know we are aware of the importance of the prompt, how it can influence the response, and how in this case and others here we don't always know what the prompt was, e.g., what biases might have gone into it, and it's something we should know in order to meaningfully judge the replies. This thread is only about asking the bot to do imitations and some of its responses have been entertaining, but no reason to be wowed.

I'm definitely wowed, especially given the state of the art only a few years ago.
Other things I have been seeing re: the rapid progress of AI over the past few months wow me much more (impressed and fearful).
This was just done for fun. For retired people on the sidelines it is just a play toy. Not so for others.

For some time now, the chatbots have been reaching rapidly into every aspect of every life, all ages, retired or not, sidelines or not. Whether one is wowed or wary or both, it's still best to be aware of how it will affect our lives and how we can best put it to work for us and avoid the downsides.

Btw, as for the entertainment value, AARP had an article last year on more examples I think would be fun for this thread:

10. Can’t you just have fun with ChatGPT?

Absolutely. Noodling around with ChatGPT is entertaining. Try wacky stuff. Ask how Homer Simpson might explain quantum computing. Ask for a list of memorable movie quotes.

Asked what Groucho Marx might have said had he been the first person to walk on the moon, ChatGPT speculated, “This moon business is a terrific idea. You always know where you stand.”

Or “I knew I’d find it eventually. The moon, the last place I’d look.”

If William Shakespeare had been the first moonwalker instead, ChatGPT offered up, “And gentle stars, that tend on man’s abode, / Show me your torchbearers, so I may tread / Upon this new and foreign shore with awe.”

Finally, ChatGPT produced this limerick about AARP, stretching the limerick rules in the first line:

There once was a group called AARP;

Whose members were all grown-ups, you see;

With discounts galore;

And advice by the score

They lived life to the fullest degree!

https://www.aarp.org/home-family/person ... wered.html

[protagonist]

this was good. did you write it or did chatgpt?

ChatGPT wrote it, in all of 5 seconds or less. (Both amazing and terrifying, simultaneously.) I thought it was funny and spot-on. Could definitely hear him actually saying (er... whining about) it.

Given what we have by now learned (hopefully) about these bots, then what they can do in 5 seconds or 1 second is hardly amazing and what can be terrifying is the human reaction to it, not just being at least initially impressed with the speed, but the supposed quality and believability of the reply. I know we are aware of the importance of the prompt, how it can influence the response, and how in this case and others here we don't always know what the prompt was, e.g., what biases might have gone into it, and it's something we should know in order to meaningfully judge the replies. This thread is only about asking the bot to do imitations and some of its responses have been entertaining, but no reason to be wowed.

I'm definitely wowed, especially given the state of the art only a few years ago.
Other things I have been seeing re: the rapid progress of AI over the past few months wow me much more (impressed and fearful).
This was just done for fun. For retired people on the sidelines it is just a play toy. Not so for others.

For some time now, the chatbots have been reaching rapidly into every aspect of every life, all ages, retired or not, sidelines or not. Whether one is wowed or wary or both, it's still best to be aware of how it will affect our lives and how we can best put it to work for us and avoid the downsides.

Btw, as for the entertainment value, AARP had an article last year on more examples I think would be fun for this thread:

10. Can’t you just have fun with ChatGPT?

Absolutely. Noodling around with ChatGPT is entertaining. Try wacky stuff. Ask how Homer Simpson might explain quantum computing. Ask for a list of memorable movie quotes.

Asked what Groucho Marx might have said had he been the first person to walk on the moon, ChatGPT speculated, “This moon business is a terrific idea. You always know where you stand.”

Or “I knew I’d find it eventually. The moon, the last place I’d look.”

If William Shakespeare had been the first moonwalker instead, ChatGPT offered up, “And gentle stars, that tend on man’s abode, / Show me your torchbearers, so I may tread / Upon this new and foreign shore with awe.”

Finally, ChatGPT produced this limerick about AARP, stretching the limerick rules in the first line:

There once was a group called AARP;

Whose members were all grown-ups, you see;

With discounts galore;

And advice by the score

They lived life to the fullest degree!

https://www.aarp.org/home-family/person ... wered.html

I completely agree with your comment.
.
And I never thought of this but since you mentioned it, I wish that Groucho was the first man to walk on the moon.
"A first step for man....." was excellent.
But Groucho could have done even better. Not to mention watching his cigar smoke rise in 1/6 G. NASA chose the wrong guy.
(Oh, right...no O2 on the moon...probably couldn't light it...never mind...) That said, his frustration would have been memorable to watch.

But as for the limerick above, well:

The limerick packs laughs anatomical
Into space that is quite economical.
But the good ones I've seen
So seldom are clean,
And the clean ones so seldom are comical.

[Fallible]

ChatGPT wrote it, in all of 5 seconds or less. (Both amazing and terrifying, simultaneously.) I thought it was funny and spot-on. Could definitely hear him actually saying (er... whining about) it.

Given what we have by now learned (hopefully) about these bots, then what they can do in 5 seconds or 1 second is hardly amazing and what can be terrifying is the human reaction to it, not just being at least initially impressed with the speed, but the supposed quality and believability of the reply. I know we are aware of the importance of the prompt, how it can influence the response, and how in this case and others here we don't always know what the prompt was, e.g., what biases might have gone into it, and it's something we should know in order to meaningfully judge the replies. This thread is only about asking the bot to do imitations and some of its responses have been entertaining, but no reason to be wowed.

I'm definitely wowed, especially given the state of the art only a few years ago.
Other things I have been seeing re: the rapid progress of AI over the past few months wow me much more (impressed and fearful).
This was just done for fun. For retired people on the sidelines it is just a play toy. Not so for others.

For some time now, the chatbots have been reaching rapidly into every aspect of every life, all ages, retired or not, sidelines or not. Whether one is wowed or wary or both, it's still best to be aware of how it will affect our lives and how we can best put it to work for us and avoid the downsides.

Btw, as for the entertainment value, AARP had an article last year on more examples I think would be fun for this thread:

10. Can’t you just have fun with ChatGPT?

Absolutely. Noodling around with ChatGPT is entertaining. Try wacky stuff. Ask how Homer Simpson might explain quantum computing. Ask for a list of memorable movie quotes.

Asked what Groucho Marx might have said had he been the first person to walk on the moon, ChatGPT speculated, “This moon business is a terrific idea. You always know where you stand.”

Or “I knew I’d find it eventually. The moon, the last place I’d look.”

If William Shakespeare had been the first moonwalker instead, ChatGPT offered up, “And gentle stars, that tend on man’s abode, / Show me your torchbearers, so I may tread / Upon this new and foreign shore with awe.”

Finally, ChatGPT produced this limerick about AARP, stretching the limerick rules in the first line:

There once was a group called AARP;

Whose members were all grown-ups, you see;

With discounts galore;

And advice by the score

They lived life to the fullest degree!

https://www.aarp.org/home-family/person ... wered.html

I completely agree with your comment.
.
And I never thought of this but since you mentioned it, I wish that Groucho was the first man to walk on the moon.
"A first step for man....." was excellent.
But Groucho could have done even better. Not to mention watching his cigar smoke rise in 1/6 G. NASA chose the wrong guy.
(Oh, right...no O2 on the moon...probably couldn't light it...never mind...) That said, his frustration would have been memorable to watch.

But as for the limerick above, well:

The limerick packs laughs anatomical
Into space that is quite economical.
But the good ones I've seen
So seldom are clean,
And the clean ones so seldom are comical.

I like the limerick and Groucho would be great on the moon, unlit cigar in hand. I thought the AARP had a good suggestion to ask the chatbot how Homer Simpson might explain quantum computing, a good topic for this forum. Any takers?

[protagonist]

I like the limerick and Groucho would be great on the moon, unlit cigar in hand. I thought the AARP had a good suggestion to ask the chatbot how Homer Simpson might explain quantum computing, a good topic for this forum. Any takers?

Along similar lines, I've asked it in the past to explain chaos theory to Barbie. That could also be actionable here. It's response:
"ChatGPT
Explaining chaos theory to Barbie, who is often associated with a simplified and fun perspective, requires breaking down the complex concepts into more accessible and engaging terms. Let's give it a shot:
"Hey Barbie! So, imagine you're at the Dreamhouse planning a super fun party. You're all set with your guests, decorations, and snacks. Now, chaos theory is like when something small, like a butterfly flapping its wings in the Dreamhouse garden, can actually lead to big changes in the weather.
Picture this: that tiny butterfly flap might set off a chain reaction, causing other little things to happen, and eventually, it could influence whether it's sunny or rainy at your party! So, chaos theory is all about how small actions can have big consequences, even in something as unpredictable as the weather.
It's like when you're styling your hair - a small change in how you brush it or add accessories can create a totally different look. That's chaos theory in action, but instead of hair, it's happening in the world around us!
So, whether it's planning parties or styling your fabulous hair, understanding chaos theory helps us see how little things can make a big splash! Cool, huh?"

Not bad, really.
I've had some very interesting theological discussions with it, but much of it is not really printable here.

[Fallible]

I like the limerick and Groucho would be great on the moon, unlit cigar in hand. I thought the AARP had a good suggestion to ask the chatbot how Homer Simpson might explain quantum computing, a good topic for this forum. Any takers?

Along similar lines, I've asked it in the past to explain chaos theory to Barbie. That could also be actionable here. It's response:
"ChatGPT
Explaining chaos theory to Barbie, who is often associated with a simplified and fun perspective, requires breaking down the complex concepts into more accessible and engaging terms. Let's give it a shot: ...

Well, it surely did realize it needed to be simple and fun (i.e., to dumb down?) when explaining chaos theory to the likes of Barbie, and it managed to do so without openly insulting her. Was it the response you were looking for?

[protagonist]

I like the limerick and Groucho would be great on the moon, unlit cigar in hand. I thought the AARP had a good suggestion to ask the chatbot how Homer Simpson might explain quantum computing, a good topic for this forum. Any takers?

Along similar lines, I've asked it in the past to explain chaos theory to Barbie. That could also be actionable here. It's response:
"ChatGPT
Explaining chaos theory to Barbie, who is often associated with a simplified and fun perspective, requires breaking down the complex concepts into more accessible and engaging terms. Let's give it a shot: ...

Well, it surely did realize it needed to be simple and fun (i.e., to dumb down?) when explaining chaos theory to the likes of Barbie, and it managed to do so without openly insulting her. Was it the response you were looking for?

You would have to ask Barbie. I have no idea if her superficial ignorance and "ditziness" is just an act or not, in order to get what she wants.
She was a creation of her place and time, 1950s America. Barbie may be another Richard Feynman in disguise, for all I know.

[MariaT]

Wow, that was fun reading and I'm impressed with AI but scared at the same time. Can’t wait for the compilations in audio book. Can ChatGPT do that as well and mimic the voices of the characters? I bet it's coming...

[Fallible]

I like the limerick and Groucho would be great on the moon, unlit cigar in hand. I thought the AARP had a good suggestion to ask the chatbot how Homer Simpson might explain quantum computing, a good topic for this forum. Any takers?

Along similar lines, I've asked it in the past to explain chaos theory to Barbie. That could also be actionable here. It's response:
"ChatGPT
Explaining chaos theory to Barbie, who is often associated with a simplified and fun perspective, requires breaking down the complex concepts into more accessible and engaging terms. Let's give it a shot: ...

Well, it surely did realize it needed to be simple and fun (i.e., to dumb down?) when explaining chaos theory to the likes of Barbie, and it managed to do so without openly insulting her. Was it the response you were looking for?

You would have to ask Barbie. I have no idea if her superficial ignorance and "ditziness" is just an act or not, in order to get what she wants.
She was a creation of her place and time, 1950s America. Barbie may be another Richard Feynman in disguise, for all I know.

Speaking of the late Mr. Feynman, it would be interesting to ask ChatGPT to describe what the great theoretical physicist thought of artificial intelligence.

[Pacific]

One of the best threads of the year. Thanks everyone.

[yankees60]

One of the best threads of the year. Thanks everyone.

Yes! HIGHLY entertaining!

[protagonist]

I like the limerick and Groucho would be great on the moon, unlit cigar in hand. I thought the AARP had a good suggestion to ask the chatbot how Homer Simpson might explain quantum computing, a good topic for this forum. Any takers?

Along similar lines, I've asked it in the past to explain chaos theory to Barbie. That could also be actionable here. It's response:
"ChatGPT
Explaining chaos theory to Barbie, who is often associated with a simplified and fun perspective, requires breaking down the complex concepts into more accessible and engaging terms. Let's give it a shot: ...

Well, it surely did realize it needed to be simple and fun (i.e., to dumb down?) when explaining chaos theory to the likes of Barbie, and it managed to do so without openly insulting her. Was it the response you were looking for?

You would have to ask Barbie. I have no idea if her superficial ignorance and "ditziness" is just an act or not, in order to get what she wants.
She was a creation of her place and time, 1950s America. Barbie may be another Richard Feynman in disguise, for all I know.

Speaking of the late Mr. Feynman, it would be interesting to ask ChatGPT to describe what the great theoretical physicist thought of artificial intelligence.

My guess is that he would be all in.
In the 1980s, when Feynman died, the idea of AI as a threat was pretty abstract.
It was explored a bit in the great emerging literary tradition of cyberpunk, and in films like 2001, but Feynman died over a decade before The Matrix. I paid out the nose for just a few Mb RAM in the early 90s, and in the early 90s modem speeds were, if I recall, 1.2-2.4 baud. Certainly the capability of ChatGPT 4.0 was far off.
Why don't you ask Mr./Ms. GPT and post the response here?

[Stinky]

Describe the Bogleheads in the style of the song "Imagine" by John Lennon

Imagine there’s no stock picks,
It’s easy if you try,
No market-timing madness,
Just watch your wealth grow high.
Imagine all the people
Investing for the long term… ah…

Imagine no high fees,
It isn’t hard to do,
No flashy funds to lure you,
Just indexes for you.
Imagine all the people
Holding strong and true… yoo-hoo…

You may say they’re Bogleheads,
And they're all about the plan,
I hope someday you’ll join us,
And see your wealth expand.

Imagine diversification,
A simple portfolio too,
A bond, a stock, a fund,
Is all you need to do.
Imagine all the people
Living financially free… ohh-wee…

You may say they’re Bogleheads,
But they’re not just dreamers, man,
I hope someday you’ll join us,
And together, we’ll invest as planned.

[yankees60]

My guess is that he would be all in.
In the 1980s, when Feynman died, the idea of AI as a threat was pretty abstract.
It was explored a bit in the great emerging literary tradition of cyberpunk, and in films like 2001, but Feynman died over a decade before The Matrix. I paid out the nose for just a few Mb RAM in the early 90s, and in the early 90s modem speeds were, if I recall, 1.2-2.4 baud. Certainly the capability of ChatGPT 4.0 was far off.
Why don't you ask Mr./Ms. GPT and post the response here?

In 1985 the company I was working for bought me a Compaq portable (weighed 26 pounds and looking like a sewing machine) for $4,000.

Back then the standard RAM was 64k. I was Mr. Big Stuff because the company also spent an additional $1,000 for above board RAM that was 1MB. I had a total of 1,064k!

[yankees60]

Describe the Bogleheads in the style of the song "Imagine" by the Beatles

Imagine there’s no stock picks,
It’s easy if you try,
No market-timing madness,
Just watch your wealth grow high.
Imagine all the people
Investing for the long term… ah…

Imagine no high fees,
It isn’t hard to do,
No flashy funds to lure you,
Just indexes for you.
Imagine all the people
Holding strong and true… yoo-hoo…

You may say they’re Bogleheads,
And they're all about the plan,
I hope someday you’ll join us,
And see your wealth expand.

Imagine diversification,
A simple portfolio too,
A bond, a stock, a fund,
Is all you need to do.
Imagine all the people
Living financially free… ohh-wee…

You may say they’re Bogleheads,
But they’re not just dreamers, man,
I hope someday you’ll join us,
And together, we’ll invest as planned.

Excellent!!!!!

( Slight correction. NOT a Beatles song. From John Lennon's first solo record.)

[Fallible]

Along similar lines, I've asked it in the past to explain chaos theory to Barbie. That could also be actionable here. It's response:
"ChatGPT
Explaining chaos theory to Barbie, who is often associated with a simplified and fun perspective, requires breaking down the complex concepts into more accessible and engaging terms. Let's give it a shot: ...

Well, it surely did realize it needed to be simple and fun (i.e., to dumb down?) when explaining chaos theory to the likes of Barbie, and it managed to do so without openly insulting her. Was it the response you were looking for?

You would have to ask Barbie. I have no idea if her superficial ignorance and "ditziness" is just an act or not, in order to get what she wants.
She was a creation of her place and time, 1950s America. Barbie may be another Richard Feynman in disguise, for all I know.

Speaking of the late Mr. Feynman, it would be interesting to ask ChatGPT to describe what the great theoretical physicist thought of artificial intelligence.

My guess is that he would be all in.
In the 1980s, when Feynman died, the idea of AI as a threat was pretty abstract.
It was explored a bit in the great emerging literary tradition of cyberpunk, and in films like 2001, but Feynman died over a decade before The Matrix. I paid out the nose for just a few Mb RAM in the early 90s, and in the early 90s modem speeds were, if I recall, 1.2-2.4 baud. Certainly the capability of ChatGPT 4.0 was far off.

Why don't you ask Mr./Ms. GPT and post the response here?

Agree on Feynman probably going "all in" on AI and, since he understood human nature, I'd guess he'd have a few warnings for us humans.

I don't have ChatGPT. Have been holding off for OpenAI's next model with fewer hallucinations. Also, being a Boglehead, I thought the monthly fee would come down considering the billions OpenAI has been making off the bot. Now there are reports the fee may go up by year's end and more after that.

[Stinky]

Excellent!!!!!

( Slight correction. NOT a Beatles song. From John Lennon's first solo record.)

Thank you. I corrected my original post.

(Senior moment)

[yankees60]

Excellent!!!!!

( Slight correction. NOT a Beatles song. From John Lennon's first solo record.)

Thank you. I corrected my original post.

(Senior moment)

Completely understandable error. I believe that record came out the same year The Beatles came out (1970?). Or, did it come out in 1971?

[5outof10]

Anyone willing to try Hunter S. Thompson?

[yankees60]

Anyone willing to try Hunter S. Thompson?

I read all the excerpts in rolling stone as they were coming out plus read the book and I was not impressed With either. Never could Understand all the acclaim for him. It was slower than normal reading to not Get much Content out of it But it seems like plenty of people went wild over that type of writing style.

[protagonist]

Well, it surely did realize it needed to be simple and fun (i.e., to dumb down?) when explaining chaos theory to the likes of Barbie, and it managed to do so without openly insulting her. Was it the response you were looking for?

You would have to ask Barbie. I have no idea if her superficial ignorance and "ditziness" is just an act or not, in order to get what she wants.
She was a creation of her place and time, 1950s America. Barbie may be another Richard Feynman in disguise, for all I know.

Speaking of the late Mr. Feynman, it would be interesting to ask ChatGPT to describe what the great theoretical physicist thought of artificial intelligence.

My guess is that he would be all in.
In the 1980s, when Feynman died, the idea of AI as a threat was pretty abstract.
It was explored a bit in the great emerging literary tradition of cyberpunk, and in films like 2001, but Feynman died over a decade before The Matrix. I paid out the nose for just a few Mb RAM in the early 90s, and in the early 90s modem speeds were, if I recall, 1.2-2.4 baud. Certainly the capability of ChatGPT 4.0 was far off.

Why don't you ask Mr./Ms. GPT and post the response here?

Agree on Feynman probably going "all in" on AI and, since he understood human nature, I'd guess he'd have a few warnings for us humans.

I don't have ChatGPT. Have been holding off for OpenAI's next model with fewer hallucinations. Also, being a Boglehead, I thought the monthly fee would come down considering the billions OpenAI has been making off the bot. Now there are reports the fee may go up by year's end and more after that.

You don't need to "have ChatGPT. Just go to this link , click on "Start Now", and then type your request in the "Message ChatGPT" box.
https://openai.com/chatgpt/

[5outof10]

Anyone willing to try Hunter S. Thompson?

I read all the excerpts in rolling stone as they were coming out plus read the book and I was not impressed With either. Never could Understand all the acclaim for him. It was slower than normal reading to not Get much Content out of it But it seems like plenty of people went wild over that type of writing style.

I agree with you that I can't say he was the most prolific writer of substance. But as you also point out, his style and voice are certainly recognizable. Just thought it would be an entertaining exercise to hear a bot try it.

Another writer that has an entertaining style and voice would be Mark Twain.

[Fallible]

You would have to ask Barbie. I have no idea if her superficial ignorance and "ditziness" is just an act or not, in order to get what she wants.
She was a creation of her place and time, 1950s America. Barbie may be another Richard Feynman in disguise, for all I know.

Speaking of the late Mr. Feynman, it would be interesting to ask ChatGPT to describe what the great theoretical physicist thought of artificial intelligence.

My guess is that he would be all in.
In the 1980s, when Feynman died, the idea of AI as a threat was pretty abstract.
It was explored a bit in the great emerging literary tradition of cyberpunk, and in films like 2001, but Feynman died over a decade before The Matrix. I paid out the nose for just a few Mb RAM in the early 90s, and in the early 90s modem speeds were, if I recall, 1.2-2.4 baud. Certainly the capability of ChatGPT 4.0 was far off.

Why don't you ask Mr./Ms. GPT and post the response here?

Agree on Feynman probably going "all in" on AI and, since he understood human nature, I'd guess he'd have a few warnings for us humans.

I don't have ChatGPT. Have been holding off for OpenAI's next model with fewer hallucinations. Also, being a Boglehead, I thought the monthly fee would come down considering the billions OpenAI has been making off the bot. Now there are reports the fee may go up by year's end and more after that.

You don't need to "have ChatGPT. Just go to this link , click on "Start Now", and then type your request in the "Message ChatGPT" box.
https://openai.com/chatgpt/

I did look into that, was tempted but didn't bite because the problem still is what the tech industry euphemistically refers to as "hallucinations." I'd be more tempted if I had a project that I thought could be accurately facilitated by a bot.

[protagonist]

I did look into that, was tempted but didn't bite because the problem still is what the tech industry euphemistically refers to as "hallucinations." I'd be more tempted if I had a project that I thought could be accurately facilitated by a bot.

Please explain "hallucinations" and why they are a problem. *naive but learning....*

[protagonist]

Anyone willing to try Hunter S. Thompson?

ChatGPT is (sadly) programmed not to swear. That might pose a problem if trying to imitate HST.