0% COLA Annuity vs COLA Annuity vs Managed Payout

Non-investing personal finance issues including insurance, credit, real estate, taxes, employment and legal issues such as trusts and wills.
Post Reply
Topic Author
PSM
Posts: 116
Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2018 9:52 am

0% COLA Annuity vs COLA Annuity vs Managed Payout

Post by PSM »

Facts:
My wife and I have a retirement benefit available from the same company.
Me: Age 66 She: Age 67

We have defined contribution invested account balances that must be converted to an annuity no later than age 73.

We also have a new option forthcoming: a managed payout of the account balances. The investments continue, but the monthly
distributions will set annually to adapt to the account balance, inflation and life expectancy. The stock and bond
funds in the accounts are private and actively managed, with expense ratios less than 1%.

Today our account balances are: Me: $501,294 She: $424,432
We do not have the option of rolling out these funds or managing them ourselves. This is not the typical choice between receiving a pension or a lump sum. And the only tweak we can make for these accounts is a risk profile that would change the mix of stocks to a low of 0% to a high of about 40% (based on expected distribution date).

The annuity option has multiple choices regarding COLAs and survivor benefits.
For example, if I were to elect an annuity beginning 2/1/2023, a 0% COLA with 100% survivor would be $2861 monthly, with a 2% COLA $2311, and 5% COLA $1608. I would be about age 77 or 78 before the monthly payments with COLA would be greater than the 0 COLA annuity, and age 88 or 89 when the grand total of a COLA payment option would be greater than the payout of the 0% COLA option. I have used the calculator at https://www.hughcalc.org/cola.php to come up with my estimates. At the end of 25 years, 2/1/2048, age 91, the 0 COLA would have paid out $858,300, the 2% COLA would be $888,264 and the 5% COLA would be $920,942.

My wife's annuity would be similar in scale, though smaller because of her lower account balance.
Because of our other assets, benefits and social security, we do not have to make a decision now. However, as part of our tax and RMD planning, I want to have a feel for how others have decided on receiving benefits.

1) Does it make sense to choose an annuity with COLA, if the total payout does not pass the 0 COLA option till after about age 88?
It would seem that higher payments early would be worth more than higher payments later due to the effects of inflation and the ability to invest those higher early distributions. Also, any thoughts about choosing a 100% survivor vs a 70%? I can see how the 100% would help if one of us were widowed for a long time. But if both of us lived about the same lifespan, the 70% annuities would be more beneficial.

2) The managed payout option is attractive mainly because the account could possibly continue to grow due to continuing investments, and any leftover could be distributed to our heir. However, no matter what our wishes might be, the managed payout would only be distributed as a monthly benefit adjusted annually. If the account balance reaches 0 before the end of life, there would be no other benefit. Because of the opportunity for account growth and leaving any balances to our heir, is the managed payout better than the annuity option?

3) My wife and I could opt for a. annuities for both of us or, b. one annuity and one managed payout or c. two managed payouts.

I am aware that there is a benefit to having "guaranteed income" in retirement. We already have social security, plus some defined benefits (pensions) from the same company, plus our 2 Rollover IRA accounts (from personal savings done via the company), 2 Roth accounts (from conversions), and a brokerage account. Total asset balances can provide enough cash flow until we will be required to start receiving this last benefit from our employer, annuities or managed payouts.

To any who have read this far, thank you. As you can see, this is a decision involving nearly a million dollars, with the effects lasting perhaps 30 years....
tibbitts
Posts: 18633
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 6:50 pm

Re: 0% COLA Annuity vs COLA Annuity vs Managed Payout

Post by tibbitts »

Since this plan is so generous with options, can you divide your funds into multiple options (per person)? Not being good at decision making that be might be my choice: every available option. You'd complicate life for yourself and your beneficiaries, but for all we talk about simplification here, almost nobody actually does that.
Topic Author
PSM
Posts: 116
Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2018 9:52 am

Re: 0% COLA Annuity vs COLA Annuity vs Managed Payout

Post by PSM »

Perhaps I need to clarify:
My wife and I will EACH have only one choice: an annuity OR the managed payout. The annuity, of course, will have the COLA and survivor options.
Silk McCue
Posts: 7647
Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2016 7:11 pm

Re: 0% COLA Annuity vs COLA Annuity vs Managed Payout

Post by Silk McCue »

The joint life annuity rates you are being quoted closely match what I found using your numbers at immediateannuities.com. I mention this because the payouts are favorably high due to the current and likely temporary high interest rates that impact annuities (how ever long you define that). Waiting to start benefits later MAY result in lower joint life benefits.

You didn’t share the 70% survivor based benefit quotes but it would be a bigger impact to your wife than to you should you predecease her. You MIGHT consider having her survivor benefit be 70% should she predecease you but I would not do the reverse as the one with the higher benefit. That’s clearly a personal decision.

I would take the no COLA option as you explored it in your item 1).

I would let your other assets be the inheritance for the survivors of you both in place of any benefit coming from the alternate approach where these funds are a managed payout.


Cheers
User avatar
#Cruncher
Posts: 3633
Joined: Fri May 14, 2010 2:33 am
Location: New York City
Contact:

Re: 0% COLA Annuity vs COLA Annuity vs Managed Payout

Post by #Cruncher »

PSM wrote: Mon Jan 23, 2023 10:27 amMe: Age 66 She: Age 67
... The annuity option has multiple choices regarding COLAs and survivor benefits.
For example, if I were to elect an annuity beginning 2/1/2023, a 0% COLA with 100% survivor would be $2861 monthly, with a 2% COLA $2311, and 5% COLA $1608.
Using the SSA 1960 Cohort Life Table for both you and your wife, the "Alive" sheet of my Longevity Estimator shows the present value of the survival-weighted benefits to be slightly higher with the No COLA option with a 4%, 5% or 6% discount rate.

Code: Select all

                  ---- Discount Rate ----
         Per Mo    0%     4%    5%    6%
         ------   ----   ----  ----  ----
No COLA  $2,861   807K   513K  466K  426K
2% COLA  $2,311   843K   510K  458K  414K
5% COLA  $1,608   901K   502K  443K  393K
Here's the detail from the "ToPaste" sheet for the "No COLA" with 5% discount rate.

Code: Select all

  Cell  Item                         Value
    F3  Table - Pers 1          Cohort1960
    F4  Table - Pers 2          Cohort1960
    H3  Sex - Pers 1                     M
    H4  Sex - Pers 2                     F
    I3  Age Years - Pers 1              66
    I4  Age Years - Pers 2              67
    O1  Amount - Pers 1 only      2,861.00
    O2  Amount - Pers 2 only      2,861.00
    O3  Amount - Both Alive       2,861.00
    O4  Discount Rate - Joint       5.000%
    T3  Annual Increase              0.00% (No COLA)
    T4  Year Increase Begins             1
    O5  Present Value - Joint      465,993
retireIn2020
Posts: 393
Joined: Sat Jan 04, 2020 6:13 pm

Re: 0% COLA Annuity vs COLA Annuity vs Managed Payout

Post by retireIn2020 »

I'm curious how much the survivor option is costing you per month on each of the policies. You could compare that cost with the cost of life insurance.
Retired as of July 2020
Topic Author
PSM
Posts: 116
Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2018 9:52 am

Re: 0% COLA Annuity vs COLA Annuity vs Managed Payout

Post by PSM »

The survivor option costs some to be sure, but at our current ages 66/67…plus a few minor/moderate medical issues, new life insurance would undoubtedly be much more expensive or impossible.

I did some extensive calculations with my New Retirement software subscription module in the past few days. One thing that did seem true after modeling a lot of scenarios…Taking annuities anytime soon would be less beneficial than continuing to live off of our other assets for now. It’s better to make further IRA withdrawals and conversions over the next few years and utilize available tax bracket space….rather than having the brackets taken up with annuity income.

Calculations also showed that after fairly sizable conversions in 2021, 2022 and 2023…future large Roth conversions may not be necessary since they would become more of a gamble on life expectancies and projected investment returns. Anyone considering Roth conversions should do careful calculations, since one can actually end up paying too much tax too early and deplete taxable accounts vs using the money to enjoy life or maintain cash flow. Before all the calculations I had nearly convinced myself that another super huge conversion this year with all the taxes and future IRMAA would be worthwhile, but it’s not. It would be more of a gamble. Depleting every traditional IRA or 401k/403b isn’t necessarily the goal.
Post Reply