And also my "investment" in CMGI stock.
Live and learn...

+1aja8888 wrote:My first wife...
So much written content is available for "free" now, but it isn't really free. We pay for it with ads and spam and vulnerability to hacking and loss of our privacy. Internet "anonymity" is like a cheap lock, it only keeps the small criminals out.Caduceus wrote:My worst large purchase in monetary terms (adjusting for time value) would probably be books. I didn't know that the world would be transitioning to paperless formats (which is a superior format to me for a variety of reasons), and it was painful to donate or throw out all the books that I've bought over the years that I wasn't going to read again.
I know many people have spoken about how they are attached to the tactile feel of a physical book. For me, having to store/move/care for physical books is not worth it. I don't buy or keep physical books anymore, apart from those with charts or guidebooks/textbook-type tomes.
Actually, it was "EastAsia". Which kind of makes your point.Ivygirl wrote: ("We have always been at war with Eurasia.")
Years from now, you may read an e-version of a book you used to know well, and be shocked that it is different from what you remember.
Actually, it was both. Which kind of makes my point.oxothuk wrote:Actually, it was "EastAsia". Which kind of makes your point.Ivygirl wrote: ("We have always been at war with Eurasia.")
Years from now, you may read an e-version of a book you used to know well, and be shocked that it is different from what you remember.
This. I bought a Honda Goldwing for 23k that sits till the weekend and the occasional trip. I figure that insurance is cheap though and it is always ready to use. It seems that when most work they have money, then when most have time, they have no money. Looking extensively at RV's, I came to the conclusion that I better dang have time to use it a hell of a lot which is not available now. Thanks to this forum and a Bogle book or two, my chances of having both time and money have increased. No guarantees but 'official retirement' is four years off. Even if one buys a boat, if it is used constantly for fishing, what a joy.gerrym51 wrote:i'm currently in the process for buying a van rv(roadtrek). however i waited until i retired so i could use it.bhsince87 wrote:RV van. Bought it used for $19K, and thought it was a deal! It cost $50k new!
And then I put in $5k bringing it up to modern specs.
And $400 in insurance every year. And an $80 inspection and $70 registration each year.
We used it 3 times.
Now I'm looking for charities who will take it away, and having a hard time finding one....
i learned my lesson with the park model rv and site i was hardly ever at.
rv's and boats have a similiar issue-although there is a cost-you need free time to use tham.
Thanks for writing these notes, as someone who once considered law school it is good to hear. And also rare to hear people who have gone through an institution and paid their dues express regrets.HMan768 wrote:I too regret law school. I started before the degree was known to be worthless (2005) and ended right when the economy collapsed (2008). I've never found work as an attorney. It's a lie that a law degree will help you when you work outside the law. In fact, it tends to hurt you during the interview process. Take a look here:happyisland wrote:About 2/3 of the way through law school I realized I would never be happy practicing any kind of law. So when I graduated I started a business and I've been an entrepreneur ever since. The vaunted "helpful in business" benefit from a legal education is real, but it's only a minor help -- definitely not worth $100,000+ and 3 years of foregone salary and work experience.frugalhen wrote:Not trying to hijack the thread, but why? I have lawyer friends who did not practice because they hated it and those who did not practice but found it helpful in business.happyisland wrote:Law school. I wish I had that money (and time!) back...
http://abovethelaw.com/2014/05/people-a ... aw-degree/
Fortunately, I went to a cheap state school so my debt is not as bad as others... But I would gladly trade in my bar admission for my tuition. In fact, I'd probably trade my admission for a few hundred bucks...
The thing about physical books is that if you've already read them and won't read again, they're either just trophies on your bookshelf or objects of negative value due to storage costs. So the same can be said for e-books you're done with - you realize most of the value of the purchase on the first read, anything else is trivial. I'm not sure if my perspective satisfactorily clears your regrets. But my bookshelf exists for books I haven't yet read, or those I plan to wholly or partially read again.Ivygirl wrote:So much written content is available for "free" now, but it isn't really free. We pay for it with ads and spam and vulnerability to hacking and loss of our privacy. Internet "anonymity" is like a cheap lock, it only keeps the small criminals out.Caduceus wrote:My worst large purchase in monetary terms (adjusting for time value) would probably be books. I didn't know that the world would be transitioning to paperless formats (which is a superior format to me for a variety of reasons), and it was painful to donate or throw out all the books that I've bought over the years that I wasn't going to read again.
I know many people have spoken about how they are attached to the tactile feel of a physical book. For me, having to store/move/care for physical books is not worth it. I don't buy or keep physical books anymore, apart from those with charts or guidebooks/textbook-type tomes.
E-books started out cheap but I notice they rapidly got expensive. I also notice that real journalism is disappearing fast and everything is a tabloid now. What are we going to pay for the loss of our journalistic watchdogs, to keep the powerful honest?
I see the decline of the printed book as a sea-change from a society which takes its lead from authority to a society which is groping for a collaborative model of finding the truth, a sort of "wiki-truth." It could be good in that voices which were not heard before, can be heard. It could be bad because going to war requires that there be wiki-truth. ("We have always been at war with Eurasia.")
Years from now, you may read an e-version of a book you used to know well, and be shocked that it is different from what you remember. It might be the Bible. It might be the Bill of Rights. It might be "Huckleberry Finn." You may walk around trying to interest others in your discovery that the text has been changed. Nobody will care. The wiki is all.
Barefootgirl wrote:A 2008 Nissan Altima
BFG
I have an economics degree and a law degree, and the economics education (if not the degree) and the law degree were both very significant in me finding my way to a very specialized law practice, which, for all the issues of being a service professional, has been a great career. So while I've no doubt the others consider similar purchases to have been negatives, I think (1) there's a lot of variety in what one buys in getting those degrees (they're not fungible) and (2) it sort of depends on what you do with them!ladders11 wrote:
Thanks for writing these notes, as someone who once considered law school it is good to hear. And also rare to hear people who have gone through an institution and paid their dues express regrets.
I don't even know if my Econ degree helped me at all... if I hadn't gone I would regret it and never hear the end of it from my dear mother. But as far as netting me better jobs or more pay than I would have had otherwise - I don't think so. It did make be smarter, this just doesn't matter much.
I have another. Buying individual internet stocks during the internet bubble. Way, way more than 10 K involved.poker27 wrote:Well in my mind there are only 3 things that cost more then $10k, homes, jewelry, or cars.frugalhen wrote:Interesting how so many people regret car purchases..........
I'd say the average book spends a week being read and 30 years gathering dust. That's not a high enough utility ratio for me to have them cluttering my house. The only books I have left are signed editions and a few reference books. Meanwhile, I read a book about every 2 weeks on my Android phone. I also have a Kindle, but the HD resolutions of current phones (I have a Galaxy S5) make me favor them for everyday reading. Some books you have to pay for, others are cheap or free.Ivygirl wrote:I am sure I have invested over $10,000 in books in my lifetime, and I have never been a big earner. Like Erasmus, "When I get a little money, I buy books. If there is any left, I buy food and clothing." How could I regret those purchases without also wishing I had never read and been affected by those books?
Hm. I have written a book. It took me a year and a half of intense creative effort. I'm not sure that the term "utility ratio" means much to me. Nor would it mean a damn to any other author worth his or her salt. Keep talking about "utility ratios" and books "cluttering your house" and you'll get what you're asking for: cheap books, ephemeral books, books without any truth to them.steve_14 wrote:I'd say the average book spends a week being read and 30 years gathering dust. That's not a high enough utility ratio for me to have them cluttering my house. The only books I have left are signed editions and a few reference books. Meanwhile, I read a book about every 2 weeks on my Android phone. I also have a Kindle, but the HD resolutions of current phones (I have a Galaxy S5) make me favor them for everyday reading. Some books you have to pay for, others are cheap or free.Ivygirl wrote:I am sure I have invested over $10,000 in books in my lifetime, and I have never been a big earner. Like Erasmus, "When I get a little money, I buy books. If there is any left, I buy food and clothing." How could I regret those purchases without also wishing I had never read and been affected by those books?
I don't know but... this could have been a wise purchase. Did you enjoy it ? Will you remember it fondly ?Ron Ronnerson wrote:We took vacations in 2005 (Greece) and 2006 (Paris) that we really couldn't afford at the time. We were newly married back then and weren't really thinking very clearly about the consequences of spending so casually. At least we got to see some interesting places, have some memorable experiences, and learned to make wiser financial decisions so some positives did come from it.
The answer to those questions is "yes" but I still think it was not wise for us to do that at the time. We were in a lot of credit card debt, had no savings, and no investments. The trips were very expensive and dug us into an even bigger hole. By the time 2007 rolled around, we woke up to the choices we'd made and started fixing things. We're in a considerably better place now. We've still enjoyed some amazing vacations since then but have been able to do it for a small fraction of the cost. I think circumstances matter. If we were to take the same vacations today as we did back then, I don't think I'd consider them mistakes.burt wrote:I don't know but... this could have been a wise purchase. Did you enjoy it ? Will you remember it fondly ?Ron Ronnerson wrote:We took vacations in 2005 (Greece) and 2006 (Paris) that we really couldn't afford at the time. We were newly married back then and weren't really thinking very clearly about the consequences of spending so casually. At least we got to see some interesting places, have some memorable experiences, and learned to make wiser financial decisions so some positives did come from it.
I certainly don't remember the wood floors, granite counter tops, new roof, furniture, and auto's I've bought over the years.
Wishing you the best.
burt
Yup, within a few months, knowing we were in a bubble. I mentally reduced my net worth by the value of the house the day we purchased it, never expect to see my purchase price again, and don't care. It was a lifestyle choice I could not achieve any other way, not an investment.maroon wrote:No one here bought a house at the top of the market (like in 2006 or so)?
+1 for that lesson I also had to learn. So many people think they know what they're doing, but don't. Much of the well-meaning advice I was given as a young adult, and took to heart, turned out to be not so useful. It was probably a good thing I didn't have any money back then as I would no doubt have done the same thing.Bracket wrote:Bought a house in 2007, DC area. Not quite the top of the market but close enough. Left the Navy in 2010, new job, had to move, sold at a loss. Had to bring 60k to closing. So dumb to buy knowing we probably wouldn't be staying. Listened to others saying "renting is for suckers, house prices always go up, etc." Not a big deal in the long run but I'd love to have that money back.
Taught me a valuable lesson though: Most people don't know what they are talking about.
Legitimately curious: does your $70k loss subtract five years of avoided rent? That may be less of a loss than you're giving yourself credit for.hmw wrote:Bought my first house in 2009 and sold it this year. Lost a little over 70k after paying for the real estate agent fees. But I don't regret the purchase. We enjoyed the house and it was much nicer than any rental house available.
Look at the bright side - had it not been a lemon, she might have driven out with ittwindad57 wrote:[...]I got a bad deal on the car, it turned out to be a lemon, and my wife at the time who convinced me to buy the car, walked out 3 months later.[...]
I was adamant not to have a $XX,XXX+ wedding, so the expense was never incurred.fizxman wrote:Luckily for me, I've never had $10,000+ to spend on anything, except cars and house, none of which I regret.
I've read a lot of people saying their ex's but I didn't see anyone say their actual wedding. For all the posts I've read about people saying spending $XX,XXX+ on a wedding was a waste, I'm surprised no one mentioned it here, unless I missed it.
sscritic wrote:My second wife.
jollystomper wrote:Oldest son' college education. I retrospect we should have gone with the school that would have cost us $100,000 less. But it was a highly ranked school in an urban setting that DS wanted to go to. After a year he decided to change his major from one that the school was known for to a more "generic" one. We should have had him transfer but he still liked the school. We just found all the hype help they said when we were deciding didn't exist once he was enrolled. And the alumni network doesn't seem much for networking other than asking alums and their parents for more donations.
We chalk that one up to experience, and have been much more discerning with our other childrens' college interests and choices.
That would be me. Bought our 'forever house' in the burbs in 2006. Six years later realized I don't like the burbs that much and we bought too much house. It's still worth nowhere near what we paid for it but DH doesn't want to move anyway so I guess it's moot.maroon wrote:No one here bought a house at the top of the market (like in 2006 or so)?
No problem with your asking.eharri3 wrote: What was his major if you don't mind my asking?