Reacting to new tax structure
Reacting to new tax structure
With a new 3.8% Medicare tax on investment income (from what I gather, starting in 2013 the new tax would apply to income from interest, dividends, annuities, royalties, capital gains and rents for individuals who earn more than $200,000 annually and joint filers reporting more than $250,000; from what I've read it would also push tax rates on capital gains and dividends that year to 23.8 percent for high-income people), how (if at all) are Board members going to alter their investment approach?
“The only place where success come before work is in the dictionary.” Abraham Lincoln. This post does not provide advice for specific individual situations and should not be construed as doing so.
-
- Posts: 2091
- Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2007 3:22 pm
I'm going to do everything I can to make sure my AGI is under $250K for myself and my wife. Given that we're mostly retired, I think we'll be able to do that. When we actually stop everything and start on SS, I'm sure we'll be able to do that. Right now, the plans are to leave the 15% rate in place on cap gains and qualified dividends for those under the AGI limits. Let's hope so anyway.
-
- Posts: 41
- Joined: Thu Nov 26, 2009 4:27 pm
Re: Reacting to new tax structure
I will do whatever it takes to keep our AGI below 250k, fortunately that won't be hard 

I'm just keeping my powder dry until congress acts. (All new money or investment income is going into short term high quality bonds.) The final bill, if any, may not look anything like the budget proposals.ResNullius wrote: Right now, the plans are to leave the 15% rate in place on cap gains and qualified dividends for those under the AGI limits.
A scientist looks for THE answer to a problem, an engineer looks for AN answer and lawyers ONLY have opinions. Investing is not a science.
- Opponent Process
- Posts: 5157
- Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2007 9:19 pm
- indexfundfan
- Posts: 3125
- Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 11:21 am
- Contact:
If the bill is signed, the tax increase is law. Tax efficient investing has always been a legitimate Boggleheads attribute. It is not political unless you start criticizing/supporting the law itself.indexfundfan wrote:Don't waste your time typing too long a reply. A few threads on this issue have already been deleted.
A scientist looks for THE answer to a problem, an engineer looks for AN answer and lawyers ONLY have opinions. Investing is not a science.
- indexfundfan
- Posts: 3125
- Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 11:21 am
- Contact:
I agree with you but this is not my view. Here's what admin said:Doc wrote:If the bill is signed, the tax increase is law. Tax efficient investing has always been a legitimate Boggleheads attribute. It is not political unless you start criticizing/supporting the law itself.indexfundfan wrote:Don't waste your time typing too long a reply. A few threads on this issue have already been deleted.
Proposed legislation (in this case the reconciliation package) is OT on this forum - we can revisit the issue when all the dust has settled.
A few other threads had already been deleted.
My signature has been deleted.
- market timer
- Posts: 6384
- Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2007 1:42 am
Whoa, so times are really tough, eh?market timer wrote:The legislation only makes my $200K in carryforward losses that much more valuable. My balance sheet is so F'd that my interests are aligned with the average voter.
An inconvenience is only an adventure wrongly considered; an adventure is an inconvenience rightly considered. -- GK Chesterton
-
- Posts: 503
- Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2007 2:45 pm
I read a bit about this too and wondered exactly how it works. So once your AGI hits the 200/250k threshold, then does the tax kick in for every dollar of investment income above that? Does "earned"mean earned income? or AGI?
What if you had wages from work of 200K (and single) and 50k of investment income. Does the 3.8 apply to the 50K? What if you had wages of 50K, and capital gains of 300K, then does the tax apply to 150K of the capital gains (300+50=350-200=150) or zero because earned income is only 50K?
I hope they don't delete the thread....as long as we don't advocate one way or another, it seems relevant.
What if you had wages from work of 200K (and single) and 50k of investment income. Does the 3.8 apply to the 50K? What if you had wages of 50K, and capital gains of 300K, then does the tax apply to 150K of the capital gains (300+50=350-200=150) or zero because earned income is only 50K?
I hope they don't delete the thread....as long as we don't advocate one way or another, it seems relevant.
It's not law yet. You are talking about aspects of the reconciliation bill that just made it to the senate today and won't be the subject of debate there until later in the week. When the bill (the reconciliation bill) is signed by the President, you will have plenty of time to sell all your stocks, change your will, etc., but until then, just relax, take a deep breath, and wait.InvestingMom wrote: I hope they don't delete the thread....as long as we don't advocate one way or another, it seems relevant.