"vanguarding"??!?
-
- Posts: 1158
- Joined: Fri Dec 12, 2008 8:02 pm
"vanguarding"??!?
(see http://www.vanguard.com)
Yeah - we have many established investors worried about opening the door to small investors and driving up costs. But instead what wonderful use and allocation of their marketing budget.The Valley Forge, Pa., mutual fund company announced Monday it launched a multi-channel advertising campaign that encourages investors to “Stop just investing and start Vanguarding.”
Sean Hagerty, a principal at Vanguard and its head of retail marketing and communications, said that ads will run in financial publications, mainstream newspapers and online.
We can't help the smaller investors nor improve our Brokerage services but we can open our pockets and spend on Vanguarding together. Hold hands everybody!
Last edited by Kenster1 on Mon Mar 15, 2010 5:42 pm, edited 1 time in total.
SURGEON GENERAL'S WARNING: Any overconfidence in your ability, willingness and need to take risk may be hazardous to your health.
-
- Posts: 1158
- Joined: Fri Dec 12, 2008 8:02 pm
- Opponent Process
- Posts: 5157
- Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2007 9:19 pm
- FrugalInvestor
- Posts: 5691
- Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2008 12:20 am
bob u. wrote:It's stupid.
I wonder how much VG paid for such stuff.
Bob U.
This was my initial reaction as well. But the more I think about it if such a campaign could effectively illuminate what separates Vanguard from their competitors such as a focus on low cost index funds, proper client asset allocation and risk tolerance assessment, a focus on the long-term and stay-the-course philosophy it may be beneficial.
It'll be interesting to see how the campaign progresses and just how effectively the message is communicated.
Edit: If 'verbizing' the name gets (younger?) people to pay attention to and perhaps understand the message them I'm all for it!
Last edited by FrugalInvestor on Tue Mar 16, 2010 2:00 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Have a plan, stay the course and simplify. Then ignore the noise!
- Sunny Sarkar
- Posts: 2435
- Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 1:02 am
- Location: Flower Mound, TX
- Contact:
I support it.
Despite occasionally coming up with utterly confusing concoctions like the Diversified Equity Fund, I believe Vanguard does stand for something special in the investment industry, and I'm inclined to support whatever it takes to spread the message in order to help people make the right choices regarding finances.
Best,
Sunny
Despite occasionally coming up with utterly confusing concoctions like the Diversified Equity Fund, I believe Vanguard does stand for something special in the investment industry, and I'm inclined to support whatever it takes to spread the message in order to help people make the right choices regarding finances.
Best,
Sunny
stratton wrote:I'm Vanguarding:
American Vanguard Corp
China Vanguard
Texas Vanguard Oil Co.
Vanguard Enviro Sol
Vanguard Intl Semi
Vanguard Minerals
Vanguard Natl Res
Vanguard Pharm
Vanguard Airlines Inc
Those are just the ones from Yahoo stock listings.
Paul
Did you Bing Vanguarding, or Google it?
I think VG can do better. Hate to admit it, but Fido's green line is pretty good. Also hate to admit, but those ads (for John Hancock, is it?) where people are texting back and forth about such things as "How do we get back to when we (retire) from will we?" are pretty thoughtful, too.
What was wrong with the light boat beating the heavy boat to the finish line. Taylor Larimore obviously wasn't consulted about that change!
"By singing in harmony from the same page of the same investing hymnal, the Diehards drown out market noise." |
|
--Jason Zweig, quoted in The Bogleheads' Guide to Investing
A slick move by Vanguard to get the registered trademark first?stratton wrote:I'm Vanguarding:
American Vanguard Corp
China Vanguard
Texas Vanguard Oil Co.
Vanguard Enviro Sol
Vanguard Intl Semi
Vanguard Minerals
Vanguard Natl Res
Vanguard Pharm
Vanguard Airlines Inc
I kind of doubt it. -- Tet
RESISTANCE IS FRUITFUL
-
- Posts: 2622
- Joined: Sun Aug 02, 2009 10:25 am
- Location: Washington
"Vanguarding" is no more silly than being called a Voyager or a Flagship member.
Excuse me, but I'm not a sailor or a boat! :lol: And the person with a small account should be treated with the same level of customer service, courtesy, and respect as the guy with a million bucks.
(and what's up with the red kite? Is that our money floating away when the next wave of corruption hits the fan? :roll: )
Excuse me, but I'm not a sailor or a boat! :lol: And the person with a small account should be treated with the same level of customer service, courtesy, and respect as the guy with a million bucks.
(and what's up with the red kite? Is that our money floating away when the next wave of corruption hits the fan? :roll: )
livesoft writes:
"It's working. Already Vanguard signed up 345,000 new customers."
Are you implying that the very term "Vanguarding" proved so effective that it drew 345000 new customers? Mind providing some evidence? Otherwise, I'll think the new customers are a coincidental, not causal, phenomenon.
Vanguard has been winning new customers for years without the Vanguarding promotion. Vanguard has a well-established brand without introducing this new nonsense.
But, hey: if you like "Vanguarding" you'll simply love "Bogleheading" (even if it may sound like a form of decapitation :lol:). Bob U.
"It's working. Already Vanguard signed up 345,000 new customers."
Are you implying that the very term "Vanguarding" proved so effective that it drew 345000 new customers? Mind providing some evidence? Otherwise, I'll think the new customers are a coincidental, not causal, phenomenon.
Vanguard has been winning new customers for years without the Vanguarding promotion. Vanguard has a well-established brand without introducing this new nonsense.
But, hey: if you like "Vanguarding" you'll simply love "Bogleheading" (even if it may sound like a form of decapitation :lol:). Bob U.
There are some things that count that can't be counted, and some things that can be counted that don't count.
- DartThrower
- Posts: 953
- Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2009 4:10 pm
- Location: Philadelphia
When I first saw this newest verb in the English language I was as appalled as everyone else. Then I thought "Gee Vanguard must have saved a ton of money on advertising because something this silly couldn't have cost much". ....so they really are keeping expenses low..... so it's a good thing!
What really sells Vanguard is (or should be) cold, hard logic and its cousin common sense. But I guess those abstract concepts in themselves have little marketing cache.
What really sells Vanguard is (or should be) cold, hard logic and its cousin common sense. But I guess those abstract concepts in themselves have little marketing cache.
Our patience will achieve more than our force. -Edmund Burke
- southerndoc
- Posts: 1138
- Joined: Wed Apr 22, 2009 7:07 pm
- Location: Atlanta
I'm a new Vanguard client (should I call myself a Vanguarder now?), but I didn't sign up because of the Vanguarding commercial.bob u. wrote:livesoft writes:
"It's working. Already Vanguard signed up 345,000 new customers."
Are you implying that the very term "Vanguarding" proved so effective that it drew 345000 new customers? Mind providing some evidence? Otherwise, I'll think the new customers are a coincidental, not causal, phenomenon.
Vanguard has been winning new customers for years without the Vanguarding promotion. Vanguard has a well-established brand without introducing this new nonsense.
But, hey: if you like "Vanguarding" you'll simply love "Bogleheading" (even if it may sound like a form of decapitation :lol:). Bob U.
Looks like franglais. As in, "surfez-vous?" (which apparently applies only to internet surfing, not the wet kind).555 wrote:Interesting. Using the search feature on this forum, "vanguarding" hit 2 threads, but "bogleheading" hit 10 threads.
So I suppose we could ask "Vanguardez-vous?" or "Vanguardons-nous?"
Bogleheadons? ("shall we Boglehead?")
Bogleheadez!
Toooo funny.
- Sunny Sarkar
- Posts: 2435
- Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 1:02 am
- Location: Flower Mound, TX
- Contact:
Vanguard always has a hard time promoting the core virtue: low costs (difference magnified by compounding). Those glasses of water on the homepage didn't do much. How about something like this... "If you were Vanguarding instead of paying 2% expense ratios to those other guys, your retirement account would be twice as big!".
Cheesy and stupid sounding. I would never express my classy low cost index investing strategy as "vanguarding". It cheapens it in my opinion. I have to admit when I got the email introducing the new buzz word, it did give me a good laugh on a day I needed it!
Last edited by jlq39 on Tue Mar 16, 2010 1:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Speaking as a marketer, I can tell you that logic and cold, hard common sense aren't useful promotional tools.DartThrower wrote:What really sells Vanguard is (or should be) cold, hard logic and its cousin common sense. But I guess those abstract concepts in themselves have little marketing cache.
Speaking out of cold hard logic, I can tell you that everyone who is going to become a Vanguard customer because of cold, hard logic and common sense will not be dissuaded by any marketing message they perceive as silly.
They've already tried "The less you pay, the more you keep." Personally I think both this and your recommendation are compelling marketing message.bob u. wrote: I can summarize Vanguard's core virtue in a near instant using plain English:
Pay Less. Make More.
"Vanguarding" will probably appeal to less sophisticated investors. And by "sophisticated" I mean people who don't realize what a massive impact expenses have on returns.
- Christine_NM
- Posts: 2791
- Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 1:13 am
- Location: New Mexico
woof755 wrote:stratton wrote:I'm Vanguarding:
American Vanguard Corp
China Vanguard
Texas Vanguard Oil Co.
Vanguard Enviro Sol
Vanguard Intl Semi
Vanguard Minerals
Vanguard Natl Res
Vanguard Pharm
Vanguard Airlines Inc
Those are just the ones from Yahoo stock listings.
Paul
Did you Bing Vanguarding, or Google it?
I'm not a lawyer, but there are 200+ categories for trademarks. They can have geographical ranges such as states and nationwide. They have to be used or they can be retracted. So Vanguard moving doesn't conflict with Vanguard the financial services company.tetractys wrote:A slick move by Vanguard to get the registered trademark first?stratton wrote:I'm Vanguarding:
American Vanguard Corp
China Vanguard
Texas Vanguard Oil Co.
Vanguard Enviro Sol
Vanguard Intl Semi
Vanguard Minerals
Vanguard Natl Res
Vanguard Pharm
Vanguard Airlines Inc
I kind of doubt it. -- Tet
I'm now at my knowledge limits.
Paul
That's good, although I think they might have some luck with the average non-boglehead investor using something like "With the money that you'll save on fees with Vanguard vs. the average mutual fund, you'll have enough for one of these (photo of man and hot blond in a new BMW convertible)."Sunny Sarkar wrote:Vanguard always has a hard time promoting the core virtue: low costs (difference magnified by compounding). Those glasses of water on the homepage didn't do much. How about something like this... "If you were Vanguarding instead of paying 2% expense ratios to those other guys, your retirement account would be twice as big!".
- ruralavalon
- Posts: 20218
- Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 10:29 am
- Location: Illinois
I thought the glasses conveyed the message fairly well.Sunny Sarkar wrote:Vanguard always has a hard time promoting the core virtue: low costs (difference magnified by compounding). Those glasses of water on the homepage didn't do much . . .
BTW Vanguard's capital inflows have been stellar recently, beating all the competition -- http://news.morningstar.com/articlenet/ ... e=0&part=3 -- although I don't believe this was really driven by advertising.
I voted "both".
Now, that's clevercherokee 8215 wrote:I think they might have some luck with the average non-boglehead investor using something like "With the money that you'll save on fees with Vanguard vs. the average mutual fund, you'll have enough for one of these (photo of man and hot blond in a new BMW convertible)."

"Everything should be as simple as it is, but not simpler." - Albert Einstein |
Wiki article link:Getting Started
Van guarde! Flagship cannons at 100 feet!csoren wrote:Looks like franglais. As in, "surfez-vous?" (which apparently applies only to internet surfing, not the wet kind).555 wrote:Interesting. Using the search feature on this forum, "vanguarding" hit 2 threads, but "bogleheading" hit 10 threads.
So I suppose we could ask "Vanguardez-vous?" or "Vanguardons-nous?"
Bogleheadons? ("shall we Boglehead?")
Bogleheadez!
Toooo funny.
When I talk to my friends, all single-stock types, about Vanguard, I get two reactions:
1. "Oh, my dad was really into Vanguard." Interpretation: someone's dad wisely learned not to pay loads on mutual funds from Jack Bogle, but Bogle's investing philosophy was not passed on.
2. "What's Vanguard?" If I had said ScottTrade, or WellsTrade, or ETrade, or Zecco, or TradeKing, these guys would all nod approvingly, assuming I was buying Citi stock.
IMHO, VG's new ad campaign isn't likely to change any of this. I'm okay with that.
NightOwl
1. "Oh, my dad was really into Vanguard." Interpretation: someone's dad wisely learned not to pay loads on mutual funds from Jack Bogle, but Bogle's investing philosophy was not passed on.
2. "What's Vanguard?" If I had said ScottTrade, or WellsTrade, or ETrade, or Zecco, or TradeKing, these guys would all nod approvingly, assuming I was buying Citi stock.
IMHO, VG's new ad campaign isn't likely to change any of this. I'm okay with that.
NightOwl
"Volatility provokes the constant dread that some investors know more than we do, making us fearful of ignoring such powerful price movements." |
Peter Bernstein, "The 60/40 Solution."
Yeah I see that all the time whenever I visited Naples, FL.ruralavalon wrote:Now, that's clevercherokee 8215 wrote:I think they might have some luck with the average non-boglehead investor using something like "With the money that you'll save on fees with Vanguard vs. the average mutual fund, you'll have enough for one of these (photo of man and hot blond in a new BMW convertible).".

SURGEON GENERAL'S WARNING: Any overconfidence in your ability, willingness and need to take risk may be hazardous to your health.
Several years ago, a grocery chain in the state where I lived ran a commercial involving their name; "Let's go Krogering". I found it so annoying I stopped going there for several years. When they dropped that inane jingle, I went back and enjoyed shopping there.
The introduction of "Vanguarding" struck me the same way, at first. I then realized it is a way to identify with an investing approach and set of values in the same way as a group being called Diehards or Bogleheads. That classification is rather appealing.
I hope that this branding technique proves successful for Vanguard.
Jerry
The introduction of "Vanguarding" struck me the same way, at first. I then realized it is a way to identify with an investing approach and set of values in the same way as a group being called Diehards or Bogleheads. That classification is rather appealing.
I hope that this branding technique proves successful for Vanguard.
Jerry
Last edited by NAVigator on Wed Mar 17, 2010 9:33 am, edited 1 time in total.
"I was born with nothing and I have most of it left."
- Teetlebaum
- Posts: 457
- Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2007 4:27 pm
I think it's dumb and vulgar, but it reminds me of Do you like Kipling?
- FrugalInvestor
- Posts: 5691
- Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2008 12:20 am
I just received my first 'Vanguarding' marketing email from Vanguard. It basically says I am already doing it, outlines the basic principles and refers me to a link with a message from Bill McNabb.
https://personal.vanguard.com/us/insigh ... g-03152010
I like the message even if I'm a bit conflicted over the word.
Link to McNabb video message..........you're no stranger to Vanguarding. In fact, you're already doing it:
Investing at cost. You keep more of what you earn because we manage our funds at cost—the funds cost you what they cost us. Profits get returned to you as cost savings. And as we've grown, the economies of scale have allowed us to continue to lower your fund costs.
Being a client owner. Your interests are our only interests, so no private owner or stockholders take a slice of your returns. Uniquely, we're owned by the funds that are owned by clients like you.
Focusing on your goals. You can benefit from our philosophy built on investing fundamentals and the power of simplicity: Get the right asset allocation, invest at cost, and stick with a plan to reach your long-term goals.
https://personal.vanguard.com/us/insigh ... g-03152010
I like the message even if I'm a bit conflicted over the word.
Have a plan, stay the course and simplify. Then ignore the noise!
-
- Posts: 503
- Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2007 2:45 pm
Very bad. Embarrassingly so.
I had to log into Bogleheads just to see what others were saying.
I don't want to exaggerate the impact, but rather than make me feel better about my investing methods, it makes me feel silly....and causes me to trust them less. After all, what other "gimmicks" are they going to stoop to to bring in new customers. Ah well, I will continue to be a good boglehead and try to ignore the fray.
I had to log into Bogleheads just to see what others were saying.
I don't want to exaggerate the impact, but rather than make me feel better about my investing methods, it makes me feel silly....and causes me to trust them less. After all, what other "gimmicks" are they going to stoop to to bring in new customers. Ah well, I will continue to be a good boglehead and try to ignore the fray.
- FrugalInvestor
- Posts: 5691
- Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2008 12:20 am
Marketing is essentially "gimmicks." To the extent it attracts the attention and convinces those who may not take the effort to seek out the information on their own it's good, in my opinion. Not everyone is going to seek out the information like many of us here do. As far as I can see the message is consistent. This is just a way to, hopefully, reach a larger audience.InvestingMom wrote:Very bad. Embarrassingly so.
I had to log into Bogleheads just to see what others were saying.
I don't want to exaggerate the impact, but rather than make me feel better about my investing methods, it makes me feel silly....and causes me to trust them less. After all, what other "gimmicks" are they going to stoop to to bring in new customers. Ah well, I will continue to be a good boglehead and try to ignore the fray.
Have a plan, stay the course and simplify. Then ignore the noise!
-
- Posts: 503
- Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2007 2:45 pm
You are right about Marketing and Gimmicks. However, when it comes to Vanguard, I believe they have built their reputation on not being gimmicky and selling their products through the facts. That is why I like them. I can trust that I am getting the straight story. "Vanguarding" is patronizing.FrugalInvestor wrote:Marketing is essentially "gimmicks." To the extent it attracts the attention and convinces those who may not take the effort to seek out the information on their own it's good, in my opinion. Not everyone is going to seek out the information like many of us here do. As far as I can see the message is consistent. This is just a way to, hopefully, reach a larger audience.InvestingMom wrote:Very bad. Embarrassingly so.
I had to log into Bogleheads just to see what others were saying.
I don't want to exaggerate the impact, but rather than make me feel better about my investing methods, it makes me feel silly....and causes me to trust them less. After all, what other "gimmicks" are they going to stoop to to bring in new customers. Ah well, I will continue to be a good boglehead and try to ignore the fray.
BTW: Why pick on my comment and not just answer the OP's question, especially given that most people seem to be agreeing with me.
- brick-house
- Posts: 475
- Joined: Thu May 07, 2009 1:16 pm
- Location: Philadelphia, PA