
I'm not seeing a downturn. Wait a second, let me get my glasses...

Oh, this downturn. What about it?
Nothing, other than I won't be surprised if it drops another 25-30%. I also won't be surprised if it rips another 20%.nisiprius wrote: Tue Mar 11, 2025 7:11 pm Downturn? Has there been a downturn?
I'm not seeing a downturn. Wait a second, let me get my glasses...
Oh, this downturn. What about it?
The problem is that it could last a decade+. From ~2000-2013 the S&P 500 basically returned nothing. You first had the dotcom crash followed by the GFC.Nelly0 wrote: Tue Mar 11, 2025 9:23 pm At this point I’m actually hoping for a big downturn. I’m 38 years old and probably have 15 years minimum before I retire. I’d like to get it out of the way now so I can stop hearing about the incoming downturn all the time.![]()
This is very true although it seems like a worst case scenario that I can’t plan around. In the meantime I’ll continue to save and invest as much as I can and hope for the best!exodusNH wrote: Tue Mar 11, 2025 10:08 pmThe problem is that it could last a decade+. From ~2000-2013 the S&P 500 basically returned nothing. You first had the dotcom crash followed by the GFC.Nelly0 wrote: Tue Mar 11, 2025 9:23 pm At this point I’m actually hoping for a big downturn. I’m 38 years old and probably have 15 years minimum before I retire. I’d like to get it out of the way now so I can stop hearing about the incoming downturn all the time.![]()
That puts you at 51, within shooting distance and at the age where workplace discrimination becomes an issue, even though it's illegal.
The vertical scale on your graph is logarithmic. To be fair and accurate, plot it on a simple arithmetic scale and see what it looks like.nisiprius wrote: Tue Mar 11, 2025 7:11 pm Downturn? Has there been a downturn?
I'm not seeing a downturn. Wait a second, let me get my glasses...
Oh, this downturn. What about it?
So it appears that everyone has a chance to get out before a downturn happens. Nice!nisiprius wrote: Tue Mar 11, 2025 7:11 pm Downturn? Has there been a downturn?
...
I'm not seeing a downturn. Wait a second, let me get my glasses...
...
Oh, this downturn. What about it?
Of course there was a market downturn. It is not going up, or flat.nisiprius wrote: Tue Mar 11, 2025 7:11 pm Downturn? Has there been a downturn?
I'm not seeing a downturn. Wait a second, let me get my glasses...
Just what I've been thinking too. Much ado about nothing.
You can borrow my Magic 8 ball. It works better than most Wall Street experts.White Coat Investor wrote: Tue Mar 11, 2025 11:21 pm Crystal ball so cloudy. I should take this thing back and ask for a refund.
Downturns are very common because STOCKS ARE RISKIER THAN BONDS. I think recency bias has led some (many?) forum commentators to forget this.nisiprius wrote: Tue Mar 11, 2025 7:11 pm Downturn? Has there been a downturn?
I'm not seeing a downturn. Wait a second, let me get my glasses...
Oh, this downturn. What about it?
I think being in touch with your emotions (rather than repressing them) is important when investing in wall street's casino.
That really depends on one's specific situation and is therefore a huge oversimplification. Not everyone is decades away from retirement.dogagility wrote: Wed Mar 12, 2025 7:09 am Just what I've been thinking too. Much ado about nothing.
Wow, that's the first time ever I've heard someone say that. Because the effect of compounding is multiplicative, a logarithmic scale is almost always the correct choice. But it's just un-checking one box in testfolio.io, so why not?syc wrote: Tue Mar 11, 2025 10:22 pm ...The vertical scale on your graph is logarithmic. To be fair and accurate, plot it on a simple arithmetic scale and see what it looks like...
Wow, that's the first time I've ever heard someone say that. Because the effect of compounding is multiplicative, a logarithmic scale is almost always the correct choice. But it's just un-checking one box in testfol.io, so why not? Happy to oblige.syc wrote: Tue Mar 11, 2025 10:22 pm ...The vertical scale on your graph is logarithmic. To be fair and accurate, plot it on a simple arithmetic scale and see what it looks like...
If you just stand there, all is well.RickBoglehead wrote: Wed Mar 12, 2025 6:48 am Saying there isn't a downturn in the market, and implying all is well, is simply ridiculous [unnecessary comment removed - moderator Kendall]. Anyone can show that over a long period of time, this is a blip. What is the point? It is still a downturn.
A full blown recession is not out of the question, significant inflation as well. To say that "all is well" is simply silly.
This is a great chart. To me what strikes as interesting is the worst case number of years it took for sp500 to hit the next all-time high, that was roughly (eyeballing) 15 years during the great depression and about 5 years during GFC. That seems like a good way to determine how much fixed income one should plan for. 10 years on average in cash-type fixed income (MM, HYSA, CD, TIPS/Tbills individual bonds in ladders, etc.) should atleast be a consideration for most in/at/near retirees?arcticpineapplecorp. wrote: Tue Mar 11, 2025 8:55 pm VTI is DOWN 6% ytd and VXUS is UP 6% ytd:
https://testfol.io/?s=fHRTEqlJdwo
so i guess it depends on what/where you're investing.
also, we spend most of our time in drawdowns:
source: https://www.oncoursefp.com/files/vector ... _final.pdf
Not much here. At one point I was almost 1% over my stock allocation and now am 0.5% under. But I should probably check out my US/Int’l ratio, perhaps there’s something there.DSBH wrote: Wed Mar 12, 2025 9:04 am Not sure about downturn, but rebalancing and/or Roth conversion opportunities for some ...
This is exactly what happened to me. I was 38 in 1999.exodusNH wrote: Tue Mar 11, 2025 10:08 pmThe problem is that it could last a decade+. From ~2000-2013 the S&P 500 basically returned nothing. You first had the dotcom crash followed by the GFC.Nelly0 wrote: Tue Mar 11, 2025 9:23 pm At this point I’m actually hoping for a big downturn. I’m 38 years old and probably have 15 years minimum before I retire. I’d like to get it out of the way now so I can stop hearing about the incoming downturn all the time.![]()
That puts you at 51, within shooting distance and at the age where workplace discrimination becomes an issue, even though it's illegal.
Every time is different, so it’s all the same. People seem to have forgotten Covid a short 5 years ago. This is a drop in the bucket compared to Covid - our stores still have plenty of toilet paper (perhaps TP availability would make a good economic indicator).RickBoglehead wrote: Wed Mar 12, 2025 11:22 am It's basically impossible to really discuss how this is different given that all references to why it's different are removed by the moderators.
My point is simple - this is different. Burying your head in the sand saying "all is well" will get you looking like Kevin Bacon in Animal House.
And that never happened before? Come on man! You need to turn the channel.MorgansRun wrote: Wed Mar 12, 2025 7:04 am This is policy driven, not market driven. One tweet can send the markets up or down by a crazy amount.
Sounds like you are hoping its different, because, well you know.RickBoglehead wrote: Wed Mar 12, 2025 11:22 am It's basically impossible to really discuss how this is different given that all references to why it's different are removed by the moderators.
My point is simple - this is different. Burying your head in the sand saying "all is well" will get you looking like Kevin Bacon in Animal House.
If we end up with a stagnant / flat market for the next 10-15 years this will be my hope. I’ll continue to chug along and make my normal contributions and hope for strong performance at the right time.quantAndHold wrote: Wed Mar 12, 2025 11:16 amThis is exactly what happened to me. I was 38 in 1999.exodusNH wrote: Tue Mar 11, 2025 10:08 pm
The problem is that it could last a decade+. From ~2000-2013 the S&P 500 basically returned nothing. You first had the dotcom crash followed by the GFC.
That puts you at 51, within shooting distance and at the age where workplace discrimination becomes an issue, even though it's illegal.
I just kept plugging away, knowing it would all work out eventually. The run up after 2008, which happened during my highest earning and saving years MADE me, and I retired comfortably at 53.
That said, I’m not (yet) concerned about this small drawdown. However, as a retiree, I am very concerned about the economic and political factors that are driving this drawdown. This is not just business as usual.
You said it. It is hard to argue how this is very different without getting moderated. When people say everytime it feels different, or point towards past scary times (WW1,2, covid, gfc, etc.) also felt different at that time, I feel people miss what is very different this time. I really hope I am wrong.RickBoglehead wrote: Wed Mar 12, 2025 11:22 am It's basically impossible to really discuss how this is different given that all references to why it's different are removed by the moderators.
My point is simple - this is different. Burying your head in the sand saying "all is well" will get you looking like Kevin Bacon in Animal House.
Having a stagnant market for 13 years would be a bit defeating and also AMAZING at the same time... Being able to buy in for 13 years without price increases would be a blessing..... retire with a solid egg and watch the 5-7% gains every year despite spending 2-4%... All growth and no eating into principle...exodusNH wrote: Tue Mar 11, 2025 10:08 pmThe problem is that it could last a decade+. From ~2000-2013 the S&P 500 basically returned nothing. You first had the dotcom crash followed by the GFC.Nelly0 wrote: Tue Mar 11, 2025 9:23 pm At this point I’m actually hoping for a big downturn. I’m 38 years old and probably have 15 years minimum before I retire. I’d like to get it out of the way now so I can stop hearing about the incoming downturn all the time.![]()
That puts you at 51, within shooting distance and at the age where workplace discrimination becomes an issue, even though it's illegal.
You are not wrong.life_force_prana wrote: Wed Mar 12, 2025 11:37 amYou said it. It is hard to argue how this is very different without getting moderated. When people say everytime it feels different, or point towards past scary times (WW1,2, covid, gfc, etc.) also felt different at that time, I feel people miss what is very different this time. I really hope I am wrong.RickBoglehead wrote: Wed Mar 12, 2025 11:22 am It's basically impossible to really discuss how this is different given that all references to why it's different are removed by the moderators.
My point is simple - this is different. Burying your head in the sand saying "all is well" will get you looking like Kevin Bacon in Animal House.
+1. It's the same kind of different that it has always been. The Covid example, to me, is a good one because if anything felt, seemed, or looked different it was the period in time surrounding that event.rkhusky wrote: Wed Mar 12, 2025 11:26 amEvery time is different, so it’s all the same. People seem to have forgotten Covid a short 5 years ago. This is a drop in the bucket compared to Covid - our stores still have plenty of toilet paper (perhaps TP availability would make a good economic indicator).RickBoglehead wrote: Wed Mar 12, 2025 11:22 am It's basically impossible to really discuss how this is different given that all references to why it's different are removed by the moderators.
My point is simple - this is different. Burying your head in the sand saying "all is well" will get you looking like Kevin Bacon in Animal House.
This is what I think is happening when I read all of the "the time its different" posts. Hubris prevents them from admitting they had the wrong AA.Fallible wrote: Wed Mar 12, 2025 11:44 am It seems a good point about keeping perspective, though it may not be of much help to investors who've taken on too much risk and for whom just one downturn reveals their true risk tolerance.