Morningstar: Tactical Allocation Funds Underperformance

Discuss all general (i.e. non-personal) investing questions and issues, investing news, and theory.
Post Reply
Topic Author
Harmanic
Posts: 2343
Joined: Mon Apr 04, 2022 10:19 am

Morningstar: Tactical Allocation Funds Underperformance

Post by Harmanic »

the average tactical asset-allocation fund has consistently underperformed more static asset-allocation funds. (I used the moderate-allocation Morningstar Category for comparison because its risk profile and target equity allocation range of 50% to 70% of assets are generally in line with those of the typical tactical asset-allocation fund.)...
Performance would look even worse if it included results for funds that were merged or liquidated. Tactical asset-allocation funds have an unusually high mortality rate: Morningstar’s database includes a total of 243 unique funds in this category (not including multiple share classes), but 126 of those no longer exist.
https://www.morningstar.com/funds/why-t ... ailedagain

Basically, they buy high and sell low.
The question isn't at what age I want to retire, it's at what income. | - George Foreman
Hydromod
Posts: 1143
Joined: Tue Mar 26, 2019 10:21 pm

Re: Morningstar: Tactical Allocation Funds Underperformance

Post by Hydromod »

One interpretation is that tactical allocation loses out because of high associated costs (ER, trading slippage). As far as I can tell, the main ways to overcome this drag are to (i) be very cost-conscious during allocation and sizing, and (ii) use leverage to boost returns during favorable market conditions.

From what I understand, there's a real tension between what performs well over the long term in tactical trading and what investors are willing to bear in terms of deviation from the market. So keeping customers tends to pull the fund towards doing strategies that do not perform as well as they might.
Post Reply