## Inversely Correlated Investments with the Greatest Spread?

### Inversely Correlated Investments with the Greatest Spread?

Curious about what could create two positions, inversely correlated, where the spread is as large as possible. For example TQQQ and SQQQ (though due to sequencing, I know they down always remain exact inverses over time). Modeling them over any length of time would ideally result in a similar shaped graph as seen below. But is there a way to proportionately leverage the positions for a greater spread (ideally not with derivatives)? Notional example for illustrative purposes:

The theoretical example for this would be a two-color roulette game: an investment on Red and an equal investment on Black = one investment results in +100% and one results in -100%. Is there a way to build portfolios like this gamble, with securities?

Appreciate any thoughts/discussion/construction.

The theoretical example for this would be a two-color roulette game: an investment on Red and an equal investment on Black = one investment results in +100% and one results in -100%. Is there a way to build portfolios like this gamble, with securities?

Appreciate any thoughts/discussion/construction.

### Re: Inversely Correlated Investments with the Greatest Spread?

What’s your goal?

Holding a product and the inverse is not a winning strategy. If it was, you could just buy TQQQ and sell TQQQ short. What would that achieve?

Holding a product and the inverse is not a winning strategy. If it was, you could just buy TQQQ and sell TQQQ short. What would that achieve?

Prediction is very difficult, especially about the future - Niels Bohr | To get the "risk premium", you really do have to take the risk - nisiprius

### Re: Inversely Correlated Investments with the Greatest Spread?

As far as a goal, this is not for a portfolio/position I'm looking to establish.

Asking here under Investing Theory, for input/assistance with a course assignment.

### Re: Inversely Correlated Investments with the Greatest Spread?

Portfolio diversification comes from

Uncorrelated assets will move independently from the stock market, hopefully providing reduced volatility compared to an all-stock portfolio.

**assets, not from inversely correlated assets. If the stock market, over the long term has historically always gone up, something with inverse correlation would have always gone down. Not something you want to hold as part of any long term portfolio.***uncorrelated*Uncorrelated assets will move independently from the stock market, hopefully providing reduced volatility compared to an all-stock portfolio.

Prediction is very difficult, especially about the future - Niels Bohr | To get the "risk premium", you really do have to take the risk - nisiprius

### Re: Inversely Correlated Investments with the Greatest Spread?

I don't disagree with anything there. Again, the question I am asking has nothing to do with creating a practical portfolio or diversification.

I am taking a graduate course on Investing Theory, which is the theme of this sub-forum, so before I finish my work I wanted to source other views. I agree with all of your points, but I didn't post this in Personal Investments for that very reason.

I am taking a graduate course on Investing Theory, which is the theme of this sub-forum, so before I finish my work I wanted to source other views. I agree with all of your points, but I didn't post this in Personal Investments for that very reason.

- firebirdparts
**Posts:**1795**Joined:**Thu Jun 13, 2019 4:21 pm

### Re: Inversely Correlated Investments with the Greatest Spread?

It’s trivial to find inversely correlated assets, as fund providers offer plenty, but I think you can’t assemble anything useful out of them.

What you want is Short-term uncorrelated assets that both have high positive returns. That you can work with.

What you want is Short-term uncorrelated assets that both have high positive returns. That you can work with.

Last edited by firebirdparts on Thu Sep 17, 2020 4:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.

A fool and your money are soon partners

### Re: Inversely Correlated Investments with the Greatest Spread?

It's unclear what you're asking.

The obvious answer is that a long and short position on the most volatile underlying available will be inversely correlated with the greatest spread.

Is that what you mean? Or something else?

The obvious answer is that a long and short position on the most volatile underlying available will be inversely correlated with the greatest spread.

Is that what you mean? Or something else?

### Re: Inversely Correlated Investments with the Greatest Spread?

A lot of folks have relied on LTT being negatively correlated with stocks; one wonders when that party will be over (again).David Jay wrote: ↑Thu Sep 17, 2020 3:19 pm Portfolio diversification comes fromassets, not from inversely correlated assets. If the stock market, over the long term has historically always gone up, something with inverse correlation would have always gone down. Not something you want to hold as part of any long term portfolio.uncorrelated

Uncorrelated assets will move independently from the stock market, hopefully providing reduced volatility compared to an all-stock portfolio.

### Re: Inversely Correlated Investments with the Greatest Spread?

Yep. I worry about my LTTs more these days. Unfortunately, TLT has remained fairly flat despite the market sell-off, unlike in March when it spiked 20%. It's worrisome to be sure.columbia wrote: ↑Thu Sep 17, 2020 4:25 pmA lot of folks have relied on LTT being negatively correlated with stocks; one wonders when that party will be over (again).David Jay wrote: ↑Thu Sep 17, 2020 3:19 pm Portfolio diversification comes fromassets, not from inversely correlated assets. If the stock market, over the long term has historically always gone up, something with inverse correlation would have always gone down. Not something you want to hold as part of any long term portfolio.uncorrelated

Uncorrelated assets will move independently from the stock market, hopefully providing reduced volatility compared to an all-stock portfolio.

### Re: Inversely Correlated Investments with the Greatest Spread?

This isn’t true: inversely correlated assets would provideDavid Jay wrote: ↑Thu Sep 17, 2020 3:19 pm Portfolio diversification comes fromuncorrelated

Uncorrelated assets will move independently from the stock market, hopefully providing reduced volatility compared to an all-stock portfolio.

**perfect**diversification to each other, especially if their variances are similar.

The practical difficulty in portfolio construction is finding pairs of inversely correlated assets that BOTH have a positive expected returns. Such pairs are clearly rare, but it’s not theoretically impossible for them to exist.

Stocks and US Treasury bonds are the closest pair most investors have access to.

"Far more money has been lost by investors preparing for corrections than has been lost in corrections themselves." ~~ Peter Lynch

### Re: Inversely Correlated Investments with the Greatest Spread?

Sorry, but I live and invest in the real world.vineviz wrote: ↑Thu Sep 17, 2020 4:34 pmThis isn’t true: inversely correlated assets would provideuncorrelated

Uncorrelated assets will move independently from the stock market, hopefully providing reduced volatility compared to an all-stock portfolio.perfectdiversification to each other, especially if their variances are similar.

The practical difficulty in portfolio construction is finding pairs of inversely correlated assets that BOTH have a positive expected returns. Such pairs are clearly rare, butit’s not theoretically impossible for them to exist.

Prediction is very difficult, especially about the future - Niels Bohr | To get the "risk premium", you really do have to take the risk - nisiprius

### Re: Inversely Correlated Investments with the Greatest Spread?

But we’re commenting in a forum dedicated to investment theory, so being correct has some value yes?David Jay wrote: ↑Thu Sep 17, 2020 4:36 pmSorry, but I live and invest in the real world.vineviz wrote: ↑Thu Sep 17, 2020 4:34 pmThis isn’t true: inversely correlated assets would provideuncorrelated

Uncorrelated assets will move independently from the stock market, hopefully providing reduced volatility compared to an all-stock portfolio.perfectdiversification to each other, especially if their variances are similar.

The practical difficulty in portfolio construction is finding pairs of inversely correlated assets that BOTH have a positive expected returns. Such pairs are clearly rare, butit’s not theoretically impossible for them to exist.

"Far more money has been lost by investors preparing for corrections than has been lost in corrections themselves." ~~ Peter Lynch

- Steve Reading
**Posts:**2460**Joined:**Fri Nov 16, 2018 10:20 pm

### Re: Inversely Correlated Investments with the Greatest Spread?

That’s not what inversely correlated means at all.

"... so high a present discounted value of wealth, it is only prudent for him to put more into common stocks compared to his present tangible wealth, borrowing if necessary" - Paul Samuelson

### Re: Inversely Correlated Investments with the Greatest Spread?

Thank you for saying this so directly.

"Far more money has been lost by investors preparing for corrections than has been lost in corrections themselves." ~~ Peter Lynch

### Re: Inversely Correlated Investments with the Greatest Spread?

That's exactly what I mean. Assuming a long and a short position could be established, the question boils down to "what is the most volatile security". The thought exercise comes into play when you try to limit it to 'home-runs and strikeouts' (not the volatile stocks that have a probability of ending up relatively close to their basis).

### Re: Inversely Correlated Investments with the Greatest Spread?

I would start looking in microcap land. A stock screener like finviz.com can show volatility and whether a given stock is shortable and/or optionable.SS Rambo wrote: ↑Thu Sep 17, 2020 6:52 pmThat's exactly what I mean. Assuming a long and a short position could be established, the question boils down to "what is the most volatile security". The thought exercise comes into play when you try to limit it to 'home-runs and strikeouts' (not the volatile stocks that have a probability of ending up relatively close to their basis).

### Re: Inversely Correlated Investments with the Greatest Spread?

Among exchange-traded instruments, UVXY is about as volatile an asset as I’ve seen. Annualized standard deviation of 130% or so.SS Rambo wrote: ↑Thu Sep 17, 2020 6:52 pmThat's exactly what I mean. Assuming a long and a short position could be established, the question boils down to "what is the most volatile security". The thought exercise comes into play when you try to limit it to 'home-runs and strikeouts' (not the volatile stocks that have a probability of ending up relatively close to their basis).

https://www.proshares.com/funds/uvxy.html

### Re: Inversely Correlated Investments with the Greatest Spread?

Bear in mind that an anonymous internet discussion is not a credible source. See the disclaimer at the bottom of every page.

Also see our Copyright Policy (Rights retained by authors).No guarantees are made as to the accuracy of the information on this site or the appropriateness of any advice to your particular situation.

### Re: Inversely Correlated Investments with the Greatest Spread?

I want to clarify that the greatest

**terminal**spread (as opposed to**ongoing**spread) will be generated by the underlying asset that has the greatest growth over the timeframe in question. Over a handpicked short timeframe, these can be the same, but likely not if the timeframe is many years.### Re: Inversely Correlated Investments with the Greatest Spread?

A straddle on a triple leveraged ETF.SS Rambo wrote: ↑Wed Sep 16, 2020 7:17 pm Curious about what could create two positions, inversely correlated, where the spread is as large as possible. For example TQQQ and SQQQ (though due to sequencing, I know they down always remain exact inverses over time). Modeling them over any length of time would ideally result in a similar shaped graph as seen below. But is there a way to proportionately leverage the positions for a greater spread (ideally not with derivatives)? Notional example for illustrative purposes:

The theoretical example for this would be a two-color roulette game: an investment on Red and an equal investment on Black = one investment results in +100% and one results in -100%. Is there a way to build portfolios like this gamble, with securities?

Appreciate any thoughts/discussion/construction.

Market timer targeting long term cycles -- aiming for several key decisions per asset class per decade