POST YOUR QUESTIONS FOR THE EXPERTS PANEL Q&A HERE

Discuss all general (i.e. non-personal) investing questions and issues, investing news, and theory.
User avatar
Topic Author
Mel Lindauer
Moderator
Posts: 31374
Joined: Mon Feb 19, 2007 8:49 pm
Location: Daytona Beach Shores, Florida
Contact:

POST YOUR QUESTIONS FOR THE EXPERTS PANEL Q&A HERE

Post by Mel Lindauer »

Hello Everyone:

Whether you'll be attending the upcoming Bogleheads Conference in October or not, you still have an opportunity to have your questions answered at the Conference by the Experts Panel.

The Panel includes:
*Christine Benz, author and Morningstar's Director of Personal Finance;
*Dr. Bill Bernstein, author and financial advisor;
*Jonathan Clements, author and former Wall Street Journal columnist'
*Rick Ferri, author and financial advisor;
*Allan Roth, author, columnist and financial advisor.

You can ask general questions to be answered by the entire Panel, or you can address your question to a specific Panel member. Multiple questions are allowed.

FIRE AWAY!
Best Regards - Mel | | Semper Fi
User avatar
JoeRetire
Posts: 6661
Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2018 2:44 pm

Re: POST YOUR QUESTIONS FOR THE EXPERTS PANEL Q&A HERE

Post by JoeRetire »

Question 1: Why does Allan Roth's name not have a star in front of it, like all the others?

:happy
It's the end of the world as we know it. | It's the end of the world as we know it. | It's the end of the world as we know it. | And I feel fine.
Sconie
Posts: 932
Joined: Sun Feb 07, 2010 10:23 am
Location: Arizona

Re: POST YOUR QUESTIONS FOR THE EXPERTS PANEL Q&A HERE

Post by Sconie »

Mel, a few topics I'd like to see discussed-----(granted, they've already been discussed ad nauseam on the BH forum).....

-Role/necessity of International bonds in a portfolio. Bernstein, Ferri and Clements all seem to indicate that they (i.e., Int'l bonds) are not necessary, while Benz (or at least Morningstar, through their suggested allocation models) would seem to intimate that they are essential.

-Given the historically low rate environment, any portfolio recommendations for the "fixed side" of one's portfolio, other than sticking with the likes of TBM?

Thank you.....
I know you think you understand what you thought I said but I'm not sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant. - Alan Greenspan
User avatar
Topic Author
Mel Lindauer
Moderator
Posts: 31374
Joined: Mon Feb 19, 2007 8:49 pm
Location: Daytona Beach Shores, Florida
Contact:

Re: POST YOUR QUESTIONS FOR THE EXPERTS PANEL Q&A HERE

Post by Mel Lindauer »

JoeRetire wrote: Sun Jul 07, 2019 6:41 am Question 1: Why does Allan Roth's name not have a star in front of it, like all the others?

:happy
Thanks for catching that. Now it does! Don't want to give Allan an inferiority complex. He'd never forgive me for that (unintentional) omission. 😊
Best Regards - Mel | | Semper Fi
Nowizard
Posts: 3141
Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2007 5:33 pm

Re: POST YOUR QUESTIONS FOR THE EXPERTS PANEL Q&A HERE

Post by Nowizard »

Classic question of whether International is needed or TSM is sufficient. Discussed, ad nauseum, of course but aids with individual decision making rather than simply following or rejecting Bogle, Three-fund, etc.

Tim
typical.investor
Posts: 2410
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2018 3:17 am

Re: POST YOUR QUESTIONS FOR THE EXPERTS PANEL Q&A HERE

Post by typical.investor »

Does factor investing diversify a portfolio, or is it concentrating into selected stocks (which are riskier but have higher return)?

If a factor diversified portfolio can have equal equal returns for less risk (by using more bonds and less equity) compared to holding total market, why doesn't the factor diversified portfolio become the market portfolio? Who doesn't want the same returns for less risk, or higher returns for the same risk (as measured by volatility)?
Last edited by typical.investor on Sun Jul 07, 2019 9:16 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
nisiprius
Advisory Board
Posts: 42585
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 9:33 am
Location: The terrestrial, globular, planetary hunk of matter, flattened at the poles, is my abode.--O. Henry

Re: POST YOUR QUESTIONS FOR THE EXPERTS PANEL Q&A HERE

Post by nisiprius »

My perception is that over the last fifty years, mainstream consensus recommendations have always evolved in one direction: more risk.

Retirement savings portfolios, including Vanguard LifeStrategy funds, used to include stocks, bonds and cash (or short-term reserves). Nowadays, only stocks and bonds. For a 30-year-old, 70/30 would have been suggested; nowadays, Target Retirement 2055 puts a 30-year-old into 90% stocks. Burton Malkiel used to recommend that 1/6th of stocks be international, now he recommends 1/2. Small-cap value is riskier than the total market, but (with rare exceptions) people suggesting small-cap value tilts do not suggest cutting overall stock allocation down to compensate.

Do you have the same perception?
Last edited by nisiprius on Sun Jul 07, 2019 11:11 am, edited 2 times in total.
Annual income twenty pounds, annual expenditure nineteen nineteen and six, result happiness; Annual income twenty pounds, annual expenditure twenty pounds ought and six, result misery.
User avatar
steve roy
Posts: 1787
Joined: Thu May 13, 2010 5:16 pm

Re: POST YOUR QUESTIONS FOR THE EXPERTS PANEL Q&A HERE

Post by steve roy »

What's the experts' consensus on a retirement portfolio's asset allocation at 70? 75? 85?

(Some experts think the equity allocation should rise over time ... so I wonder ...)
User avatar
nisiprius
Advisory Board
Posts: 42585
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 9:33 am
Location: The terrestrial, globular, planetary hunk of matter, flattened at the poles, is my abode.--O. Henry

Re: POST YOUR QUESTIONS FOR THE EXPERTS PANEL Q&A HERE

Post by nisiprius »

Let's distinguish between "I'm convinced about X and I do it myself" and "Generally, almost everyone should do X."

Over the last twenty years, are there new things you think generally almost everyone should do, that you wouldn't have recommended twenty years ago?
Last edited by nisiprius on Sun Jul 07, 2019 11:10 am, edited 1 time in total.
Annual income twenty pounds, annual expenditure nineteen nineteen and six, result happiness; Annual income twenty pounds, annual expenditure twenty pounds ought and six, result misery.
Luckywon
Posts: 1215
Joined: Tue Mar 28, 2017 10:33 am

Re: POST YOUR QUESTIONS FOR THE EXPERTS PANEL Q&A HERE

Post by Luckywon »

What is each panelist's guess for average annual real return on domestic equities over the next 10 years?
treypar
Posts: 120
Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2008 6:55 pm
Location: GA

Re: POST YOUR QUESTIONS FOR THE EXPERTS PANEL Q&A HERE

Post by treypar »

Under what conditions should a retiree consider buying an immediate annuity?
User avatar
JoeRetire
Posts: 6661
Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2018 2:44 pm

Re: POST YOUR QUESTIONS FOR THE EXPERTS PANEL Q&A HERE

Post by JoeRetire »

Mel Lindauer wrote: Sun Jul 07, 2019 7:15 am
JoeRetire wrote: Sun Jul 07, 2019 6:41 am Question 1: Why does Allan Roth's name not have a star in front of it, like all the others?

:happy
Thanks for catching that. Now it does! Don't want to give Allan an inferiority complex. He'd never forgive me for that (unintentional) omission. 😊
Good - they are all stars!
It's the end of the world as we know it. | It's the end of the world as we know it. | It's the end of the world as we know it. | And I feel fine.
User avatar
JoeRetire
Posts: 6661
Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2018 2:44 pm

Re: POST YOUR QUESTIONS FOR THE EXPERTS PANEL Q&A HERE

Post by JoeRetire »

For the panel to answer:

- Under what conditions does it make sense to pay off a mortgage early? Under what conditions does it not?

- How should one determine the optimal age to claim social security benefits? What are the considerations you would use? Is there a tool you would use?

- For how long of a retirement should the typical individual plan? How should we think about longevity these days?
It's the end of the world as we know it. | It's the end of the world as we know it. | It's the end of the world as we know it. | And I feel fine.
livesoft
Posts: 74562
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 8:00 pm

Re: POST YOUR QUESTIONS FOR THE EXPERTS PANEL Q&A HERE

Post by livesoft »

How do you save people from themselves when it comes to investing and personal finance?
Wiki This signature message sponsored by sscritic: Learn to fish.
Wind_Reaver
Posts: 122
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 3:15 pm

Re: POST YOUR QUESTIONS FOR THE EXPERTS PANEL Q&A HERE

Post by Wind_Reaver »

Open question for the panel.
  • How should investors respond to an increasing rate of deprecation among financial products, services, and providers?
stan1
Posts: 9558
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 4:35 pm

Re: POST YOUR QUESTIONS FOR THE EXPERTS PANEL Q&A HERE

Post by stan1 »

How should a healthy, hopefully long-lived 60 year old couple with a $1M portfolio evaluate risk? What techniques should they employ in portfolio construction to manage risk during draw down? Let's assume SS and Medicare are unchanged and this couple does not have employer pensions.
Last edited by stan1 on Sun Jul 07, 2019 7:52 pm, edited 1 time in total.
CoastalWinds
Posts: 1063
Joined: Sat Apr 06, 2019 8:28 pm

Re: POST YOUR QUESTIONS FOR THE EXPERTS PANEL Q&A HERE

Post by CoastalWinds »

1. In this new normal low-interest environment, how should we view value vs growth investing?

2. Does VG want people to migrate from mutual funds to their ETF counterparts?
Fallible
Posts: 7632
Joined: Fri Nov 27, 2009 4:44 pm
Contact:

Re: POST YOUR QUESTIONS FOR THE EXPERTS PANEL Q&A HERE

Post by Fallible »

This question is about financial literacy courses and what they should include. Some financial experts suggest not only adding Behavioral Finance to financial literacy classes, but making it the main part of them (in addition to the mechanics of personal finance and investing). The idea is to show people how and why they make financial decisions, how emotions play out when it comes to money, how emotions can be positive and negative, and why it's important to know themselves to achieve emotional control.
"Yes, investing is simple. But it is not easy, for it requires discipline, patience, steadfastness, and that most uncommon of all gifts, common sense." ~Jack Bogle
User avatar
steve roy
Posts: 1787
Joined: Thu May 13, 2010 5:16 pm

Re: POST YOUR QUESTIONS FOR THE EXPERTS PANEL Q&A HERE

Post by steve roy »

Re private equity: it keeps coming up in msm that Vanguard is looking to get into private equity, maybe develop a mutual fund that indexes PE. A recent example:

https://www.cnbc.com/2019/07/05/investo ... arket.html

So my question: Will Vanguard be building a private equity mutual fund? And if so, when?
Swampy
Posts: 774
Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2012 7:16 am
Location: Between gators, rattlers and snowbirds

Re: POST YOUR QUESTIONS FOR THE EXPERTS PANEL Q&A HERE

Post by Swampy »

For the risk averse:
Minimum (versus 'ideal)' recommended allocation to equities vs bonds in a retirement portfolio that is being drawn upon 2.5-3.5% annually to allow the portfolio to keep up with inflation adjustments in annual spending and leave a legacy vs depletion of the portfolio over 3-4 decades.
If you fail to plan, you plan to fail. | Failure is not an option. | If I have seen further, it is because I was carried on the shoulders of giants.
student5
Posts: 51
Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2016 8:07 pm

Re: POST YOUR QUESTIONS FOR THE EXPERTS PANEL Q&A HERE

Post by student5 »

For the Panel:

Taxpayers in the 24% Federal Tax bracket and above - should the bond allocation portion be 100% municipal bonds?
Any comments on municipal default risk for Vanguard Long Term Tax Exempt (VWLTX)?

Thanks
User avatar
Sandtrap
Posts: 12454
Joined: Sat Nov 26, 2016 6:32 pm
Location: Hawaii No Ka Oi , N. Arizona
Contact:

Re: POST YOUR QUESTIONS FOR THE EXPERTS PANEL Q&A HERE

Post by Sandtrap »

Sconie wrote: Sun Jul 07, 2019 7:08 am Mel, a few topics I'd like to see discussed-----(granted, they've already been discussed ad nauseam on the BH forum).....

-Role/necessity of International bonds in a portfolio. Bernstein, Ferri and Clements all seem to indicate that they (i.e., Int'l bonds) are not necessary, while Benz (or at least Morningstar, through their suggested allocation models) would seem to intimate that they are essential.

-Given the historically low rate environment, any portfolio recommendations for the "fixed side" of one's portfolio, other than sticking with the likes of TBM?

Thank you.....
Same question here as well.
Aloha
jim :D
Wiki Bogleheads Wiki: Everything You Need to Know
User avatar
Eagle33
Posts: 1144
Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2017 3:20 pm

Re: POST YOUR QUESTIONS FOR THE EXPERTS PANEL Q&A HERE

Post by Eagle33 »

Luckywon wrote: Sun Jul 07, 2019 10:05 am What is each panelist's guess for average annual real return on domestic equities over the next 10 years?
A slight variation:
What average annual real return for equities/bonds/cash does each panelist use in their personal financial plans - next 10 years? What returns beyond 10 years?
Rocket science is not “rocket science” to a rocket scientist, just as personal finance is not “rocket science” to a Boglehead.
Elena
Posts: 384
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2016 5:42 pm

Re: POST YOUR QUESTIONS FOR THE EXPERTS PANEL Q&A HERE

Post by Elena »

I read a lot of posts beginning with "I am 30something/40something/60something" and just found this site".

Question:

* How could a small financial curriculum be implemented in high schools, so that investment venues/philosophies/strategies are taught instead of being "discovered" by chance, sometimes 30 years into life?
User avatar
Stinky
Posts: 6440
Joined: Mon Jun 12, 2017 11:38 am
Location: Sweet Home Alabama

Re: POST YOUR QUESTIONS FOR THE EXPERTS PANEL Q&A HERE

Post by Stinky »

Elena wrote: Mon Jul 08, 2019 4:06 am I read a lot of posts beginning with "I am 30something/40something/60something" and just found this site".

Question:

* How could a small financial curriculum be implemented in high schools, so that investment venues/philosophies/strategies are taught instead of being "discovered" by chance, sometimes 30 years into life?
+1

I think about this a lot. So many of my co-workers, even the "well-educated" ones, were totally clueless about some pretty basic money management skills.
It's a GREAT day to be alive! - Travis Tritt
Silence Dogood
Posts: 1447
Joined: Tue Feb 01, 2011 9:22 pm

Re: POST YOUR QUESTIONS FOR THE EXPERTS PANEL Q&A HERE

Post by Silence Dogood »

Do you think that the Vanguard Target Retirement funds have an appropriate glide path? If not, why not?

Which would you recommend for most investors, a glide path or a fixed allocation?

What is your opinion of all-in-one funds like Vanguard's Target Retirement and LifeStrategy funds?
User avatar
dogagility
Posts: 1304
Joined: Fri Feb 24, 2017 6:41 am

Re: POST YOUR QUESTIONS FOR THE EXPERTS PANEL Q&A HERE

Post by dogagility »

In the investing world, risk is often equated with volatility. However, short-term volatility may not be a good measure of risk for many investors. Some people bring "black swan" events into the risk discussion. How would you define risk for the long-term investor, and how should the long-term investor adjust their portfolio to mitigate this risk?
All children spill milk. Learn to smile and wipe it up. -- A Farmer's Wife
User avatar
nisiprius
Advisory Board
Posts: 42585
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 9:33 am
Location: The terrestrial, globular, planetary hunk of matter, flattened at the poles, is my abode.--O. Henry

Re: POST YOUR QUESTIONS FOR THE EXPERTS PANEL Q&A HERE

Post by nisiprius »

Some Morningstar category averages, for categories like "managed futures," "multialternative," and "commodities broad basket," stunningly underperform expectations set by advocates.

Are Morningstar category averages a fair way to judge what real-world investors have experienced in a category, or are they systematically pessimistic and hopelessly flawed?

Image
Last edited by nisiprius on Sun Jul 21, 2019 1:19 pm, edited 4 times in total.
Annual income twenty pounds, annual expenditure nineteen nineteen and six, result happiness; Annual income twenty pounds, annual expenditure twenty pounds ought and six, result misery.
rai
Posts: 1292
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 7:11 am

Re: POST YOUR QUESTIONS FOR THE EXPERTS PANEL Q&A HERE

Post by rai »

Are high quality corporate bond funds more worthwhile in low rate environment we are in?
"Life is what happens to you while you're busy making other plans" - John Lennon. | | "You say that money, isn't everything | But I'd like to see you live without it." - Silverchair
Zen Panda
Posts: 9
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2018 9:16 pm

Re: POST YOUR QUESTIONS FOR THE EXPERTS PANEL Q&A HERE

Post by Zen Panda »

I just listened to an interview of Perth Tolle about her freedom index and would like panel to discuss the trend in moral value investing as in climate change, political freedoms, human rights. Do they see this as a growing trend? What evidence is there that it is a good/bad investment strategy.

If the SECURE act passes and the stretch IRA for non spouse beneficiaries goes away what impact do they think it will have? For those of us who planned on leaving large IRA’s to children and already put as much as we could in Tax deferred accounts what is the best strategy for estate planning going forward if it passes?

Thanks,
PinkPonies777
Posts: 17
Joined: Sun Jun 09, 2019 3:05 pm
Location: Florida

60 Years old just starting to invest

Post by PinkPonies777 »

Income 150K net in passive rental income (all mobile homes). No debt therefore easy to save 120k/year. Spouse has earned income of 60k. Other spouse approx. 20k in commissions. We are healthy 60 years old. We will stay managing rentals for 10 years then sell (current retail value 1.2 million) or hire manager. Roth IRA 30k. Employer 401 - 25k. HSA - 5k & 200k in savings. Best advice to Save money on yearly taxes and invest for retirement?
User avatar
Topic Author
Mel Lindauer
Moderator
Posts: 31374
Joined: Mon Feb 19, 2007 8:49 pm
Location: Daytona Beach Shores, Florida
Contact:

Re: 60 Years old just starting to invest

Post by Mel Lindauer »

PinkPonies777 wrote: Thu Jul 11, 2019 12:19 am Income 150K net in passive rental income (all mobile homes). No debt therefore easy to save 120k/year. Spouse has earned income of 60k. Other spouse approx. 20k in commissions. We are healthy 60 years old. We will stay managing rentals for 10 years then sell (current retail value 1.2 million) or hire manager. Roth IRA 30k. Employer 401 - 25k. HSA - 5k & 200k in savings. Best advice to Save money on yearly taxes and invest for retirement?
Sorry, but personal advice questions will not be addressed.

We're looking for general investing questions that apply to a broad number of investors, not one individual.
Best Regards - Mel | | Semper Fi
sixtyforty
Posts: 516
Joined: Tue Nov 25, 2014 12:22 pm
Location: USA

Re: POST YOUR QUESTIONS FOR THE EXPERTS PANEL Q&A HERE

Post by sixtyforty »

For retirement.... What withdrawal strategy is recommended ? How does the withdrawal strategy work in a bear market ? Any changes to the portfolio allocation ?
"Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication" - Leonardo Da Vinci
User avatar
grabiner
Advisory Board
Posts: 28743
Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 11:58 pm
Location: Columbia, MD

Re: POST YOUR QUESTIONS FOR THE EXPERTS PANEL Q&A HERE

Post by grabiner »

Now that it is possible to invest in commodities at a low cost (with Vanguard's commodity fund at 0.20% expenses, and several ETFs at 0.25%), who should invest in them?
Wiki David Grabiner
CoastalWinds
Posts: 1063
Joined: Sat Apr 06, 2019 8:28 pm

Re: POST YOUR QUESTIONS FOR THE EXPERTS PANEL Q&A HERE

Post by CoastalWinds »

What is your long-term prognosis for VG’s energy fund (VGENX)? It has significantly underperformed the broader market in the 9 years since fracking took off. Is that (or something else) a permanent game-changer for the industry and the fund, or do you expect reversion to the mean over a long time horizon?
CoastalWinds
Posts: 1063
Joined: Sat Apr 06, 2019 8:28 pm

Re: POST YOUR QUESTIONS FOR THE EXPERTS PANEL Q&A HERE

Post by CoastalWinds »

Do any of the panelists advise to (or personally do) adjust balances of different accounts (pre-tax, Roth, taxable with LTCGs) to “like tax status” for the purpose of calculating AA?
User avatar
packer16
Posts: 1414
Joined: Sat Jan 04, 2014 2:28 pm

Re: POST YOUR QUESTIONS FOR THE EXPERTS PANEL Q&A HERE

Post by packer16 »

In most cases, estimates of equity & bond returns from the early 2000s were substantially off. They all appeared to be off in the direction of assuming mean reversion in returns. For example, In B. Bernstein's book in 2002 he had real returns of corp bonds at 3.5% as well as large cap stocks. The subsequent returns were 2% real return for bonds and 7% for LC stocks. His SCV forecast was closer 7% real versus 9% actual. What did the forecasters miss? It appears historical norms of differences between asset class returns (differences between bonds & stocks) held but estimates of deviations from these norms did not. Has that changed they way the estimate expected returns today?

Given low interest rates, what are the panels thoughts on more illiquid credit instruments that provide higher yields like private debt, infrastructure financing & triple net lease real estate.

Packer
Buy cheap and something good might happen
kupuna
Posts: 79
Joined: Mon Jan 26, 2015 3:37 am
Location: San Diego/Maui

Re: POST YOUR QUESTIONS FOR THE EXPERTS PANEL Q&A HERE

Post by kupuna »

There are some great questions for the panel. I'll sort through every question and I hope yours makes it in the Q&A discussion.

TOM
"I can calculate the motions of the heavenly bodies, but not the madness of people." Sir Isaac Newton
Dinosaur Dad
Posts: 201
Joined: Wed Feb 22, 2017 6:05 pm
Location: Connecticut

Re: POST YOUR QUESTIONS FOR THE EXPERTS PANEL Q&A HERE

Post by Dinosaur Dad »

Many new retirees plan to delay social security until age 70, and take RMDs at 70.5 to allow more tax-free growth. In the interim, the challenge is to create income from the after tax part of your portfolio (and maybe do some Roth conversions at the same time). In a low interest rate environment, what are the experts recommending as optimal strategies to invest your after-tax portfolio to create needed income while still providing the opportunity for longer-term growth and manage sequence
risk?
"Take calculated risks - that is quite different from being rash." | General George S. Patton
JimmyJammy
Posts: 252
Joined: Sat Oct 26, 2013 1:08 pm

Re: POST YOUR QUESTIONS FOR THE EXPERTS PANEL Q&A HERE

Post by JimmyJammy »

Where and when will the Q&A be posted?
megabad
Posts: 3334
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2018 4:00 pm

Re: POST YOUR QUESTIONS FOR THE EXPERTS PANEL Q&A HERE

Post by megabad »

JimmyJammy wrote: Tue Jul 23, 2019 11:44 pm Where and when will the Q&A be posted?
I have always thought the wiki is usually a good source for reviewing conference happenings. Typically videos and notes are aggregated here for each year's conference after it takes place.

https://www.bogleheads.org/wiki/Boglehe ... onferences
User avatar
Topic Author
Mel Lindauer
Moderator
Posts: 31374
Joined: Mon Feb 19, 2007 8:49 pm
Location: Daytona Beach Shores, Florida
Contact:

Re: POST YOUR QUESTIONS FOR THE EXPERTS PANEL Q&A HERE

Post by Mel Lindauer »

megabad wrote: Wed Jul 24, 2019 3:07 pm
JimmyJammy wrote: Tue Jul 23, 2019 11:44 pm Where and when will the Q&A be posted?
I have always thought the wiki is usually a good source for reviewing conference happenings. Typically videos and notes are aggregated here for each year's conference after it takes place.

https://www.bogleheads.org/wiki/Boglehe ... onferences
Yep, that's the way it works. And since our volunteer Bogleheads videographer is also a heart surgeon, his work obviously takes priority over getting the videos up on the wiki. They do eventually get there, though, but some years it's just faster than others.
Best Regards - Mel | | Semper Fi
KBREAMK
Posts: 102
Joined: Thu Mar 14, 2019 6:25 pm

Re: POST YOUR QUESTIONS FOR THE EXPERTS PANEL Q&A HERE

Post by KBREAMK »

What % of stocks should be in US vs International index funds?
User avatar
nisiprius
Advisory Board
Posts: 42585
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 9:33 am
Location: The terrestrial, globular, planetary hunk of matter, flattened at the poles, is my abode.--O. Henry

Re: POST YOUR QUESTIONS FOR THE EXPERTS PANEL Q&A HERE

Post by nisiprius »

Fama and French divided the universe of stocks into a 3 x 2 matrix, with "blend" in between "growth" and "value," but only two size categories, "big" and "small." Does anyone know why Morningstar chose to create a 3 x 3 style box matrix, rather than following Fama and French?
Annual income twenty pounds, annual expenditure nineteen nineteen and six, result happiness; Annual income twenty pounds, annual expenditure twenty pounds ought and six, result misery.
JimmyJammy
Posts: 252
Joined: Sat Oct 26, 2013 1:08 pm

Re: POST YOUR QUESTIONS FOR THE EXPERTS PANEL Q&A HERE

Post by JimmyJammy »

Isn't there a case to be made to construct a portfolio that has a higher yield than what index funds pay?

VTSAX pays only 1.84%.

If I wanted an annual income of $80,000 I'd need $4.2 million in a portfolio yielding 1.9%. But you'd only need $842,105 from a portfolio yielding 9.5%.

Of course, you'd need to load up on high-yielding stocks and other high-yield assets that are reasonably safe/reliable. Don't a lot of retirees or near-retirees do that kind of thing?

What are the pros and cons?
SGM
Posts: 3100
Joined: Wed Mar 23, 2011 4:46 am

Re: POST YOUR QUESTIONS FOR THE EXPERTS PANEL Q&A HERE

Post by SGM »

How do you suggest long time investors who still own individual stock with high capital gains sell these off to become more diversified. Selling them all at once would mean bearing a large amount of taxes. Should they sell those stocks with lower capital gains first or last? What factors lean towards not selling stocks with high capital gains? I think this is a problem for those who started investing before low cost index funds were available.
GrowthSeeker
Posts: 939
Joined: Tue May 15, 2018 10:14 pm

Re: POST YOUR QUESTIONS FOR THE EXPERTS PANEL Q&A HERE

Post by GrowthSeeker »

When comparing different Roth Conversion scenarios, one typically looks at the expected effect on portfolio value for some future point (or points) in time.
When making a portfolio valuation, what relative weight would you give a dollar in Tax Deferred vs After tax vs Roth accounts? If this varies from client to client, how do you make the decision?
For what time periods would you look at the resulting portfolio values? (e.g. the person's life expectancy, or 10 year intervals, and/or the effect on their estate and heirs?)
Last edited by GrowthSeeker on Mon Jul 29, 2019 10:40 am, edited 1 time in total.
Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they're NOT out to get you.
Rexindex
Posts: 211
Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2011 7:12 pm

Re: POST YOUR QUESTIONS FOR THE EXPERTS PANEL Q&A HERE

Post by Rexindex »

What would you advise clients under the age of 55 to expect as a percentage of current Social Security benefits to be on the safe side?
“Attention is the rarest and purest form of generosity.” | — Simone Weil
stephenspapa
Posts: 15
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 1:44 pm

Re: POST YOUR QUESTIONS FOR THE EXPERTS PANEL Q&A HERE

Post by stephenspapa »

Rexindex wrote: Mon Jul 29, 2019 10:43 am What would you advise clients under the age of 55 to expect as a percentage of current Social Security benefits to be on the safe side?
I have the same question but for those over 55. Should I plan, when I hit 70, that I'll have 100% benefits? When I hit 80? Should I plan for COLA increases?
User avatar
nisiprius
Advisory Board
Posts: 42585
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 9:33 am
Location: The terrestrial, globular, planetary hunk of matter, flattened at the poles, is my abode.--O. Henry

Re: POST YOUR QUESTIONS FOR THE EXPERTS PANEL Q&A HERE

Post by nisiprius »

How Many Stocks Diversify Unsystematic Risk? That's the title of an article in Morningstar Classroom that says
Frank Reilly and Keith Brown reported that in one set of studies for randomly selected stocks, "…about 90% of the maximum benefit of diversification was derived from portfolios of 12 to 18 stocks." In other words, if you own about 12 to 18 stocks, you have obtained more than 90% of the benefits of diversification, assuming you own an equally weighted portfolio.
That of course brought to mind Dr. Bernstein's article year 2000 article, The 15-Stock Diversification Myth:
Fifteen stocks is not enough. Thirty is not enough. Even 200 is not enough. The only way to truly minimize the risks of stock ownership is by owning the whole market.
I'd like to hear Dr. Bernstein's comments, and anybody else's, on current thinking.
Annual income twenty pounds, annual expenditure nineteen nineteen and six, result happiness; Annual income twenty pounds, annual expenditure twenty pounds ought and six, result misery.
Locked