We’ve won the game...but how do we stop playing?
-
- Posts: 318
- Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2017 7:22 am
We’ve won the game...but how do we stop playing?
Hi all. I love William Bernstein’s quote “If you’ve won the game, stop playing.” But here is the issue:
Let’s say a person has held seceral sector funds at Vanguard for decades (Healthcare, etc.) She has done extraordinarily well over many many years. (She has a very low portion in bonds. She is probably 80/20.)
As I’ve learned and adopted the Boglehead way, I’ve explained to her that I would prefer she hold Total Stock Market/Total Bond Market (I am not a fan of the sectors.) Or even sell the investments completely since she has won the game.
But her concern is taxes. If she sells, she will have a huge tax bill. Her preference is to continue holding these funds forever, and then give them to the family when she passes. As beneficiaries, there will be no tax consequence (correct?)
So how does she stop playing the game?
Let’s say a person has held seceral sector funds at Vanguard for decades (Healthcare, etc.) She has done extraordinarily well over many many years. (She has a very low portion in bonds. She is probably 80/20.)
As I’ve learned and adopted the Boglehead way, I’ve explained to her that I would prefer she hold Total Stock Market/Total Bond Market (I am not a fan of the sectors.) Or even sell the investments completely since she has won the game.
But her concern is taxes. If she sells, she will have a huge tax bill. Her preference is to continue holding these funds forever, and then give them to the family when she passes. As beneficiaries, there will be no tax consequence (correct?)
So how does she stop playing the game?
Last edited by simplesauce on Fri May 29, 2020 11:19 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: We’ve won the game...but how do we stop playing?
It's a nice pithy quote, but I don't think it really has any useful meaning.simplesauce wrote: ↑Thu May 16, 2019 12:48 pm Hi all. I love William Bernstein’s quote “If you’ve won the game, stop playing.” But here is the issue:
My grandmother has held seceral sector funds at Vanguard for decades (Healthcare, etc.) She has done extraordinarily well over many many years. (She has a very low portion in bonds. She is probably 80/20.)
As I’ve learned and adopted the Boglehead way, I’ve explained to her that I would prefer she hold Total Stock Market/Total Bond Market (I am not a fan of the sectors.) Or even sell the investments completely since she has won the game.
But her concern is taxes. If she sells, she will have a huge tax bill. Her preference is to continue holding these funds forever, and then give them to the family when she passes. As beneficiaries, there will be no tax consequence (correct?)
So how does she stop playing the game?
What "game" are you supposed to stop playing? Life still happens.
A lot of people interpret this to mean "lower your exposure to equity risks", but then you are just taking on different kinds of risk, inflation being a significant one.
Once in a while you get shown the light, in the strangest of places if you look at it right.
-
- Posts: 25617
- Joined: Thu Apr 05, 2007 8:20 pm
- Location: New York
Re: We’ve won the game...but how do we stop playing?
Listen to your grandmother. She won, but it's her money and her right to determine what is right for her. It doesn't matter what you prefer, it's not your money. If she passes the holdings to beneficiaries, under current law the beneficiaries will receive a stepped up basis in the equity - no capital gains taxes under federal law, can't comment on state taxes as they may be different.simplesauce wrote: ↑Thu May 16, 2019 12:48 pm Hi all. I love William Bernstein’s quote “If you’ve won the game, stop playing.” But here is the issue:
My grandmother has held seceral sector funds at Vanguard for decades (Healthcare, etc.) She has done extraordinarily well over many many years. (She has a very low portion in bonds. She is probably 80/20.)
As I’ve learned and adopted the Boglehead way, I’ve explained to her that I would prefer she hold Total Stock Market/Total Bond Market (I am not a fan of the sectors.) Or even sell the investments completely since she has won the game.
But her concern is taxes. If she sells, she will have a huge tax bill. Her preference is to continue holding these funds forever, and then give them to the family when she passes. As beneficiaries, there will be no tax consequence (correct?)
So how does she stop playing the game?
"One should invest based on their need, ability and willingness to take risk - Larry Swedroe" Asking Portfolio Questions
Re: We’ve won the game...but how do we stop playing?
A small first step is to direct dividends to the Total Stock Market/Total Bond Market instead of the sector funds (assuming that is what she wants to do).
Second, does she have "space" available to sell any amount of funds at a 0% capital gains rate?
Third, does she donate to any charities/organizations? If they accept it, she could gift appreciated stock instead and hold onto the cash.
Second, does she have "space" available to sell any amount of funds at a 0% capital gains rate?
Third, does she donate to any charities/organizations? If they accept it, she could gift appreciated stock instead and hold onto the cash.
-
- Posts: 630
- Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2018 4:41 pm
Re: We’ve won the game...but how do we stop playing?
This is a common issue. It doesn't have to be all or nothing. If one has 1M in various sectoe funds. Selling 1M may be equally foolish as selling none and remaining concentrated.
Maybe slowly scale out of them each year to limit the tax hit. Or just plan to reduce the concentrations by 50%.
Covered calls may also be helpful...but I don't think they're ETFS. I've been using them to scale out of individual stocks to index..if they rise enough then they are called which means they're high which offsets the tax hit. At a high enough price the gains likely offset tax hit.
Maybe slowly scale out of them each year to limit the tax hit. Or just plan to reduce the concentrations by 50%.
Covered calls may also be helpful...but I don't think they're ETFS. I've been using them to scale out of individual stocks to index..if they rise enough then they are called which means they're high which offsets the tax hit. At a high enough price the gains likely offset tax hit.
- willthrill81
- Posts: 32250
- Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2017 2:17 pm
- Location: USA
- Contact:
Re: We’ve won the game...but how do we stop playing?
+1marcopolo wrote: ↑Thu May 16, 2019 12:51 pmIt's a nice pithy quote, but I don't think it really has any useful meaning.simplesauce wrote: ↑Thu May 16, 2019 12:48 pm Hi all. I love William Bernstein’s quote “If you’ve won the game, stop playing.” But here is the issue:
My grandmother has held seceral sector funds at Vanguard for decades (Healthcare, etc.) She has done extraordinarily well over many many years. (She has a very low portion in bonds. She is probably 80/20.)
As I’ve learned and adopted the Boglehead way, I’ve explained to her that I would prefer she hold Total Stock Market/Total Bond Market (I am not a fan of the sectors.) Or even sell the investments completely since she has won the game.
But her concern is taxes. If she sells, she will have a huge tax bill. Her preference is to continue holding these funds forever, and then give them to the family when she passes. As beneficiaries, there will be no tax consequence (correct?)
So how does she stop playing the game?
What "game" are you supposed to stop playing? Life still happens.
A lot of people interpret this to mean "lower your exposure to equity risks", but then you are just taking on different kinds of risk, inflation being a significant one.
You can't know that you've "won the game" until you're dead.
The Sensible Steward
Re: We’ve won the game...but how do we stop playing?
I suggest she stops "playing the game" by not touching her investments any more, except for discontinuing re-investment of dividends/capital gains that the funds generate. Those can either be spent or be invested in something stable.
She could also donate the riskier assets to charity in-kind and not have to pay taxes on them. Let the charity sell them.
She could also donate the riskier assets to charity in-kind and not have to pay taxes on them. Let the charity sell them.
- whodidntante
- Posts: 13090
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:11 pm
- Location: outside the echo chamber
Re: We’ve won the game...but how do we stop playing?
Derivatives solve this problem. She can take a short position to reduce or eliminate exposure to her long position. Find the most liquid options market among the same ETF or a competing ETF that has a better options market. And then buy a long-dated put option at a level of loss you can live with, or even one in the money if she can't stand any loss. She can also sell S&P500 futures to gain very cheap short exposure, but that would only cancel the market exposure, not the sector exposure. And she has to roll the position more often that way.
She can also outright short the underlying by borrowing shares and selling them immediately, but that would probably be the most expensive approach.
She should seek education on derivatives before using them, but honestly, it's not that bad if you are motivated and interested.
She can also outright short the underlying by borrowing shares and selling them immediately, but that would probably be the most expensive approach.
She should seek education on derivatives before using them, but honestly, it's not that bad if you are motivated and interested.
Re: We’ve won the game...but how do we stop playing?
Dying seems like a poor definition of winning.willthrill81 wrote: ↑Thu May 16, 2019 12:55 pm You can't know that you've "won the game" until you're dead.
Re: We’ve won the game...but how do we stop playing?
Why should she? Sounds like you have an opinion and she has the money as well as the investment strategy she prefers. As long as she is capable of managing her financial affairs how she does so is really none of your business just because you think X is better than Y.simplesauce wrote: ↑Thu May 16, 2019 12:48 pm Hi all. I love William Bernstein’s quote “If you’ve won the game, stop playing.” But here is the issue:
My grandmother has held seceral sector funds at Vanguard for decades (Healthcare, etc.) She has done extraordinarily well over many many years. (She has a very low portion in bonds. She is probably 80/20.)
As I’ve learned and adopted the Boglehead way, I’ve explained to her that I would prefer she hold Total Stock Market/Total Bond Market (I am not a fan of the sectors.) Or even sell the investments completely since she has won the game.
But her concern is taxes. If she sells, she will have a huge tax bill. Her preference is to continue holding these funds forever, and then give them to the family when she passes. As beneficiaries, there will be no tax consequence (correct?)
So how does she stop playing the game?
Not to mention, if the funds are not needed immediately the logic of leaving things alone to be passed on to beneficiaries with a favorable tax implication seems to be a pretty good plan.
In other words, if it ain't broke and it ain't yours to fix anyway, leave it alone.
- willthrill81
- Posts: 32250
- Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2017 2:17 pm
- Location: USA
- Contact:
Re: We’ve won the game...but how do we stop playing?
I didn't say that dying was winning. I said that you can't know that you've "won the game" (i.e. didn't run out of needed money in your lifetime) until you're life is over.DonIce wrote: ↑Thu May 16, 2019 1:00 pmDying seems like a poor definition of winning.willthrill81 wrote: ↑Thu May 16, 2019 12:55 pm You can't know that you've "won the game" until you're dead.
The Sensible Steward
Re: We’ve won the game...but how do we stop playing?
I'd just leave it alone. Respect her wishes and be thankful for what you might inherit with stepped up basis.
Re: We’ve won the game...but how do we stop playing?
The Boglehead way is one way to reach your objective, there are many other methods that work. As you state, she has “won the game” doing something that works for her. Its her money let her be.simplesauce wrote: ↑Thu May 16, 2019 12:48 pm As I’ve learned and adopted the Boglehead way, I’ve explained to her that I would prefer she hold Total Stock Market/Total Bond Market (I am not a fan of the sectors.) Or even sell the investments completely since she has won the game.
"It is not the man who has too little, but the man who craves more, that is poor." --Seneca
Re: We’ve won the game...but how do we stop playing?
Did you read what William Bernstein said along with that...it breaks it down into several risks, Inflation was easily dealt with. It was not a stand alone phrase.marcopolo wrote: ↑Thu May 16, 2019 12:51 pmIt's a nice pithy quote, but I don't think it really has any useful meaning.simplesauce wrote: ↑Thu May 16, 2019 12:48 pm Hi all. I love William Bernstein’s quote “If you’ve won the game, stop playing.” But here is the issue:
My grandmother has held seceral sector funds at Vanguard for decades (Healthcare, etc.) She has done extraordinarily well over many many years. (She has a very low portion in bonds. She is probably 80/20.)
As I’ve learned and adopted the Boglehead way, I’ve explained to her that I would prefer she hold Total Stock Market/Total Bond Market (I am not a fan of the sectors.) Or even sell the investments completely since she has won the game.
But her concern is taxes. If she sells, she will have a huge tax bill. Her preference is to continue holding these funds forever, and then give them to the family when she passes. As beneficiaries, there will be no tax consequence (correct?)
So how does she stop playing the game?
What "game" are you supposed to stop playing? Life still happens.
A lot of people interpret this to mean "lower your exposure to equity risks", but then you are just taking on different kinds of risk, inflation being a significant one.
Re: We’ve won the game...but how do we stop playing?
Right, I got that. Personally though I'd rather be able to claim victory a little earlier and enjoy having won the game for a bit while still alive haha.willthrill81 wrote: ↑Thu May 16, 2019 1:03 pm I didn't say that dying was winning. I said that you can't know that you've "won the game" (i.e. didn't run out of needed money in your lifetime) until you're life is over.
- willthrill81
- Posts: 32250
- Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2017 2:17 pm
- Location: USA
- Contact:
Re: We’ve won the game...but how do we stop playing?
How can we easily deal with inflation? Own a lot of TIPS and I-bonds?gilgamesh wrote: ↑Thu May 16, 2019 1:09 pmDid you read what William Bernstein said along with that...it breaks it down into several risks, Inflation was easily dealt with. It was not a stand alone phrase.marcopolo wrote: ↑Thu May 16, 2019 12:51 pmIt's a nice pithy quote, but I don't think it really has any useful meaning.simplesauce wrote: ↑Thu May 16, 2019 12:48 pm Hi all. I love William Bernstein’s quote “If you’ve won the game, stop playing.” But here is the issue:
My grandmother has held seceral sector funds at Vanguard for decades (Healthcare, etc.) She has done extraordinarily well over many many years. (She has a very low portion in bonds. She is probably 80/20.)
As I’ve learned and adopted the Boglehead way, I’ve explained to her that I would prefer she hold Total Stock Market/Total Bond Market (I am not a fan of the sectors.) Or even sell the investments completely since she has won the game.
But her concern is taxes. If she sells, she will have a huge tax bill. Her preference is to continue holding these funds forever, and then give them to the family when she passes. As beneficiaries, there will be no tax consequence (correct?)
So how does she stop playing the game?
What "game" are you supposed to stop playing? Life still happens.
A lot of people interpret this to mean "lower your exposure to equity risks", but then you are just taking on different kinds of risk, inflation being a significant one.
The Sensible Steward
Re: We’ve won the game...but how do we stop playing?
Yes...he recommends even a certain percentage of gold if the monetary system collapses.willthrill81 wrote: ↑Thu May 16, 2019 1:12 pmHow can we easily deal with inflation? Own a lot of TIPS and I-bonds?gilgamesh wrote: ↑Thu May 16, 2019 1:09 pmDid you read what William Bernstein said along with that...it breaks it down into several risks, Inflation was easily dealt with. It was not a stand alone phrase.marcopolo wrote: ↑Thu May 16, 2019 12:51 pmIt's a nice pithy quote, but I don't think it really has any useful meaning.simplesauce wrote: ↑Thu May 16, 2019 12:48 pm Hi all. I love William Bernstein’s quote “If you’ve won the game, stop playing.” But here is the issue:
My grandmother has held seceral sector funds at Vanguard for decades (Healthcare, etc.) She has done extraordinarily well over many many years. (She has a very low portion in bonds. She is probably 80/20.)
As I’ve learned and adopted the Boglehead way, I’ve explained to her that I would prefer she hold Total Stock Market/Total Bond Market (I am not a fan of the sectors.) Or even sell the investments completely since she has won the game.
But her concern is taxes. If she sells, she will have a huge tax bill. Her preference is to continue holding these funds forever, and then give them to the family when she passes. As beneficiaries, there will be no tax consequence (correct?)
So how does she stop playing the game?
What "game" are you supposed to stop playing? Life still happens.
A lot of people interpret this to mean "lower your exposure to equity risks", but then you are just taking on different kinds of risk, inflation being a significant one.
Re: We’ve won the game...but how do we stop playing?
Pretty salty stuff for my grandma.whodidntante wrote: ↑Thu May 16, 2019 12:59 pm Derivatives solve this problem. She can take a short position to reduce or eliminate exposure to her long position. Find the most liquid options market among the same ETF or a competing ETF that has a better options market. And then buy a long-dated put option at a level of loss you can live with, or even one in the money if she can't stand any loss. She can also sell S&P500 futures to gain very cheap short exposure, but that would only cancel the market exposure, not the sector exposure. And she has to roll the position more often that way.
She can also outright short the underlying by borrowing shares and selling them immediately, but that would probably be the most expensive approach.
She should seek education on derivatives before using them, but honestly, it's not that bad if you are motivated and interested.
Retired 12/31/2015
Re: We’ve won the game...but how do we stop playing?
So, TIPs, maybe some gold, derivatives, annuities, etc.gilgamesh wrote: ↑Thu May 16, 2019 1:12 pmYes...he recommends even a certain percentage of gold if the monetary system collapses.willthrill81 wrote: ↑Thu May 16, 2019 1:12 pmHow can we easily deal with inflation? Own a lot of TIPS and I-bonds?gilgamesh wrote: ↑Thu May 16, 2019 1:09 pmDid you read what William Bernstein said along with that...it breaks it down into several risks, Inflation was easily dealt with. It was not a stand alone phrase.marcopolo wrote: ↑Thu May 16, 2019 12:51 pmIt's a nice pithy quote, but I don't think it really has any useful meaning.simplesauce wrote: ↑Thu May 16, 2019 12:48 pm Hi all. I love William Bernstein’s quote “If you’ve won the game, stop playing.” But here is the issue:
My grandmother has held seceral sector funds at Vanguard for decades (Healthcare, etc.) She has done extraordinarily well over many many years. (She has a very low portion in bonds. She is probably 80/20.)
As I’ve learned and adopted the Boglehead way, I’ve explained to her that I would prefer she hold Total Stock Market/Total Bond Market (I am not a fan of the sectors.) Or even sell the investments completely since she has won the game.
But her concern is taxes. If she sells, she will have a huge tax bill. Her preference is to continue holding these funds forever, and then give them to the family when she passes. As beneficiaries, there will be no tax consequence (correct?)
So how does she stop playing the game?
What "game" are you supposed to stop playing? Life still happens.
A lot of people interpret this to mean "lower your exposure to equity risks", but then you are just taking on different kinds of risk, inflation being a significant one.
Hardly seems like you have "stopped playing the game".
Just maybe making different moves.
Once in a while you get shown the light, in the strangest of places if you look at it right.
- Sandtrap
- Posts: 19582
- Joined: Sat Nov 26, 2016 5:32 pm
- Location: Hawaii No Ka Oi - white sandy beaches, N. Arizona 1 mile high.
Re: We’ve won the game...but how do we stop playing?
Grandmother has a good point. She's doing fine on her own. Loves the game. No reason to stop.simplesauce wrote: ↑Thu May 16, 2019 12:48 pm Hi all. I love William Bernstein’s quote “If you’ve won the game, stop playing.” But here is the issue:
My grandmother has held seceral sector funds at Vanguard for decades (Healthcare, etc.) She has done extraordinarily well over many many years. (She has a very low portion in bonds. She is probably 80/20.)
As I’ve learned and adopted the Boglehead way, I’ve explained to her that I would prefer she hold Total Stock Market/Total Bond Market (I am not a fan of the sectors.) Or even sell the investments completely since she has won the game.
But her concern is taxes. If she sells, she will have a huge tax bill. Her preference is to continue holding these funds forever, and then give them to the family when she passes. As beneficiaries, there will be no tax consequence (correct?)
So how does she stop playing the game?
Re: We’ve won the game...but how do we stop playing?
Your grandma kicked butt, she deserves to enjoy her victory, not be lectured by her upstart grandkid armed with a bumper sticker.
Unless you think her retirement will be endangered by her current AA, and it doesn't sound like it is, back off
Unless you think her retirement will be endangered by her current AA, and it doesn't sound like it is, back off
-
- Posts: 630
- Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2018 4:41 pm
Re: We’ve won the game...but how do we stop playing?
I think this violates IRS code. If you're hedging a long term positing with gains which mimics selling it..then you dont get benefits of the hedge or something like that. There's rules against this...whodidntante wrote: ↑Thu May 16, 2019 12:59 pm Derivatives solve this problem. She can take a short position to reduce or eliminate exposure to her long position. Find the most liquid options market among the same ETF or a competing ETF that has a better options market. And then buy a long-dated put option at a level of loss you can live with, or even one in the money if she can't stand any loss. She can also sell S&P500 futures to gain very cheap short exposure, but that would only cancel the market exposure, not the sector exposure. And she has to roll the position more often that way.
She can also outright short the underlying by borrowing shares and selling them immediately, but that would probably be the most expensive approach.
She should seek education on derivatives before using them, but honestly, it's not that bad if you are motivated and interested.
Re: We’ve won the game...but how do we stop playing?
It doesn't sound like she wants to stop playing the game. I would leave it be. You are correct that heirs would get a step-up in basis when she passes, but depending on the size of the estate it may be subject to the estate tax.
- willthrill81
- Posts: 32250
- Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2017 2:17 pm
- Location: USA
- Contact:
Re: We’ve won the game...but how do we stop playing?
I don't think so. There's nothing I'm aware of that prevents you from holding an asset while also using a futures contract to effectively zero out that position.SovereignInvestor wrote: ↑Thu May 16, 2019 1:41 pmI think this violates IRS code. If you're hedging a long term positing with gains which mimics selling it..then you dont get benefits of the hedge or something like that. There's rules against this...whodidntante wrote: ↑Thu May 16, 2019 12:59 pm Derivatives solve this problem. She can take a short position to reduce or eliminate exposure to her long position. Find the most liquid options market among the same ETF or a competing ETF that has a better options market. And then buy a long-dated put option at a level of loss you can live with, or even one in the money if she can't stand any loss. She can also sell S&P500 futures to gain very cheap short exposure, but that would only cancel the market exposure, not the sector exposure. And she has to roll the position more often that way.
She can also outright short the underlying by borrowing shares and selling them immediately, but that would probably be the most expensive approach.
She should seek education on derivatives before using them, but honestly, it's not that bad if you are motivated and interested.
The Sensible Steward
-
- Posts: 318
- Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2017 7:22 am
Re: We’ve won the game...but how do we stop playing?
Solid answer, and probably the easiest solution for everyone. Some of these other answers seem too complicated.pennywise wrote: ↑Thu May 16, 2019 1:01 pmWhy should she? Sounds like you have an opinion and she has the money as well as the investment strategy she prefers. As long as she is capable of managing her financial affairs how she does so is really none of your business just because you think X is better than Y.simplesauce wrote: ↑Thu May 16, 2019 12:48 pm Hi all. I love William Bernstein’s quote “If you’ve won the game, stop playing.” But here is the issue:
My grandmother has held seceral sector funds at Vanguard for decades (Healthcare, etc.) She has done extraordinarily well over many many years. (She has a very low portion in bonds. She is probably 80/20.)
As I’ve learned and adopted the Boglehead way, I’ve explained to her that I would prefer she hold Total Stock Market/Total Bond Market (I am not a fan of the sectors.) Or even sell the investments completely since she has won the game.
But her concern is taxes. If she sells, she will have a huge tax bill. Her preference is to continue holding these funds forever, and then give them to the family when she passes. As beneficiaries, there will be no tax consequence (correct?)
So how does she stop playing the game?
Not to mention, if the funds are not needed immediately the logic of leaving things alone to be passed on to beneficiaries with a favorable tax implication seems to be a pretty good plan.
In other words, if it ain't broke and it ain't yours to fix anyway, leave it alone.
-
- Posts: 318
- Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2017 7:22 am
Re: We’ve won the game...but how do we stop playing?
Cheers! Fair point!
- goodenyou
- Posts: 3601
- Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2010 10:57 pm
- Location: Skating to Where the Puck is Going to Be..or on the golf course
Re: We’ve won the game...but how do we stop playing?
Success from passive and naive investing is success nonetheless. Many folks amass a fortune by living below their means and by being prodigious savers. Not everyone is in pursuit of the "Efficient Frontier"of investing like many Bogleheads. When family is involved , it can be very frustrating. It is often not your place to interject with proof that their investing style is unnecessary or foolish. I have several very smart people in my family that behave foolishly with investing. Stock picking, advisors (a "Guy"), foolish asset allocations etc. They avoid the subject with me because they don't want to feel foolish that they have been wasting money. They avoid the simple education of personal finance and pay a dear penalty for it. They will not suffer any consequences because they have way more than enough and live way below their means. They are helping their advisors retire. You shouldn't try to fix it.
"Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge" |
“At 50, everyone has the face he deserves”
Re: We’ve won the game...but how do we stop playing?
Yes she did, and she is probably about the same age as my mother. My mom was ruled by fear, stuffed her late husband's winnings into savings accounts, where it was eroded by inflation.
They say that it takes three generations to squander wealth, but my family managed to do it in record time!
Re: We’ve won the game...but how do we stop playing?
OP. Here is the important question - does she need the money? If she X million and needs that much or close to fund the lifestyle she wants, then she should de risk. However, if she has 5x more money than she actually will spend, then might as well let the market ride and make it an inheritance question.
-
- Posts: 630
- Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2018 4:41 pm
Re: We’ve won the game...but how do we stop playing?
https://www.thetaxadviser.com/issues/20 ... ry-05.htmlwillthrill81 wrote: ↑Thu May 16, 2019 1:45 pmI don't think so. There's nothing I'm aware of that prevents you from holding an asset while also using a futures contract to effectively zero out that position.SovereignInvestor wrote: ↑Thu May 16, 2019 1:41 pmI think this violates IRS code. If you're hedging a long term positing with gains which mimics selling it..then you dont get benefits of the hedge or something like that. There's rules against this...whodidntante wrote: ↑Thu May 16, 2019 12:59 pm Derivatives solve this problem. She can take a short position to reduce or eliminate exposure to her long position. Find the most liquid options market among the same ETF or a competing ETF that has a better options market. And then buy a long-dated put option at a level of loss you can live with, or even one in the money if she can't stand any loss. She can also sell S&P500 futures to gain very cheap short exposure, but that would only cancel the market exposure, not the sector exposure. And she has to roll the position more often that way.
She can also outright short the underlying by borrowing shares and selling them immediately, but that would probably be the most expensive approach.
She should seek education on derivatives before using them, but honestly, it's not that bad if you are motivated and interested.
-
- Posts: 630
- Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2018 4:41 pm
Re: We’ve won the game...but how do we stop playing?
I trade futures, and at tax season every year Turbo tax asks me if it is a hedging transaction
- willthrill81
- Posts: 32250
- Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2017 2:17 pm
- Location: USA
- Contact:
Re: We’ve won the game...but how do we stop playing?
Please quote the pertinent material. Naked links are not permitted on the forum.SovereignInvestor wrote: ↑Thu May 16, 2019 2:32 pmhttps://www.thetaxadviser.com/issues/20 ... ry-05.htmlwillthrill81 wrote: ↑Thu May 16, 2019 1:45 pmI don't think so. There's nothing I'm aware of that prevents you from holding an asset while also using a futures contract to effectively zero out that position.SovereignInvestor wrote: ↑Thu May 16, 2019 1:41 pmI think this violates IRS code. If you're hedging a long term positing with gains which mimics selling it..then you dont get benefits of the hedge or something like that. There's rules against this...whodidntante wrote: ↑Thu May 16, 2019 12:59 pm Derivatives solve this problem. She can take a short position to reduce or eliminate exposure to her long position. Find the most liquid options market among the same ETF or a competing ETF that has a better options market. And then buy a long-dated put option at a level of loss you can live with, or even one in the money if she can't stand any loss. She can also sell S&P500 futures to gain very cheap short exposure, but that would only cancel the market exposure, not the sector exposure. And she has to roll the position more often that way.
She can also outright short the underlying by borrowing shares and selling them immediately, but that would probably be the most expensive approach.
She should seek education on derivatives before using them, but honestly, it's not that bad if you are motivated and interested.
The Sensible Steward
-
- Posts: 771
- Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2017 2:51 pm
Re: We’ve won the game...but how do we stop playing?
Does your grandmother intend to leave significant amounts of money to charity? If so, donating appreciated securities to a donor-advised fund or directly to charities can be a fantastic way to manage exposure while achieving charitable goals.
Alternatively, you can just manually market-cap weight the sector holdings. You pay more in expenses and have additional complexity, but Vanguard's sector funds are cheap enough that it'll likely work out better than realizing a bunch of capital gains. If she still has Roth or tax-deferred accounts, she can do some tax-free rebalancing there to improve things.
Perfect is kind of the enemy of good here, too. She's saved enough money and invested it in low-cost diversified stock funds. Over-weighting healthcare and other sectors isn't the best choice, but it's honestly not all that bad.
Alternatively, you can just manually market-cap weight the sector holdings. You pay more in expenses and have additional complexity, but Vanguard's sector funds are cheap enough that it'll likely work out better than realizing a bunch of capital gains. If she still has Roth or tax-deferred accounts, she can do some tax-free rebalancing there to improve things.
Perfect is kind of the enemy of good here, too. She's saved enough money and invested it in low-cost diversified stock funds. Over-weighting healthcare and other sectors isn't the best choice, but it's honestly not all that bad.
Current portfolio: 60% VTI / 40% VXUS
Re: We’ve won the game...but how do we stop playing?
it's not your call what your grandmother does with her money.
so she's not a boglehead, so what. many people do very well in the market owning individual stocks/sectors.
so she's not a boglehead, so what. many people do very well in the market owning individual stocks/sectors.
Re: We’ve won the game...but how do we stop playing?
Sounds good to me.Grt2bOutdoors wrote: ↑Thu May 16, 2019 12:52 pmListen to your grandmother. She won, but it's her money and her right to determine what is right for her. It doesn't matter what you prefer, it's not your money. If she passes the holdings to beneficiaries, under current law the beneficiaries will receive a stepped up basis in the equity - no capital gains taxes under federal law, can't comment on state taxes as they may be different.simplesauce wrote: ↑Thu May 16, 2019 12:48 pm Hi all. I love William Bernstein’s quote “If you’ve won the game, stop playing.” But here is the issue:
My grandmother has held seceral sector funds at Vanguard for decades (Healthcare, etc.) She has done extraordinarily well over many many years. (She has a very low portion in bonds. She is probably 80/20.)
As I’ve learned and adopted the Boglehead way, I’ve explained to her that I would prefer she hold Total Stock Market/Total Bond Market (I am not a fan of the sectors.) Or even sell the investments completely since she has won the game.
But her concern is taxes. If she sells, she will have a huge tax bill. Her preference is to continue holding these funds forever, and then give them to the family when she passes. As beneficiaries, there will be no tax consequence (correct?)
So how does she stop playing the game?
Re: We’ve won the game...but how do we stop playing?
Aside from one attempt to actually answer the question (and I don't know enough about derivatives to comment) one of the rules of the game is that you have to pay to get out. But knowing that when you started, I don't see a problem with that. The more you have to pay the bigger you won. I don't have a specific solution other than to study your tax position and work through the lowest cost options.
Re: We’ve won the game...but how do we stop playing?
Maybe you and grandma share some quality time playing with some Monte Carlo sims?
If she's rich enough to whether the storm, and she really has the goal of helping out future generations, maybe 80/20 is indeed the correct asset allocation?
If she's rich enough to whether the storm, and she really has the goal of helping out future generations, maybe 80/20 is indeed the correct asset allocation?
Re: We’ve won the game...but how do we stop playing?
My vote is to your grandma
Re: We’ve won the game...but how do we stop playing?
@SovereignInvestor and @whodidntante:
I think you may be talking past each other. Futures and options have different tax treatment but both can be used to hedge.
@SovereignInvestor is saying you can’t hedge without a tax hit from the offsetting gains being treated as ordinary income. That’s not universally true but it does apply to certain futures which appear to be the kind he’s familiar with. But you can hedge with options and not have that problem.
@whodidntante mentions both options and futures. Later says doesn’t think futures have a tax problem in response to @SovereignInvestor. Futures can in fact have a tax problem but more broadly you can hedge other ways without the ordinary income issue.
Suffice to say one probably shouldn’t get too fancy in their portfolio without clearly understanding the implications taxwise of what they are investing in nor should one assume two similar investment tools have the same tax treatment.
I think you may be talking past each other. Futures and options have different tax treatment but both can be used to hedge.
@SovereignInvestor is saying you can’t hedge without a tax hit from the offsetting gains being treated as ordinary income. That’s not universally true but it does apply to certain futures which appear to be the kind he’s familiar with. But you can hedge with options and not have that problem.
@whodidntante mentions both options and futures. Later says doesn’t think futures have a tax problem in response to @SovereignInvestor. Futures can in fact have a tax problem but more broadly you can hedge other ways without the ordinary income issue.
Suffice to say one probably shouldn’t get too fancy in their portfolio without clearly understanding the implications taxwise of what they are investing in nor should one assume two similar investment tools have the same tax treatment.
Re: We’ve won the game...but how do we stop playing?
Well, we constantly talk about the supposed tax efficiency of equities in taxable accounts and one potentially big factor in that is the basis step-up, so actually that is one of the answers. The same thing can be done in effect by donating appreciated securities to a qualified charity. It is also true that securities gifted to someone could be sold by them and the gains taxed at their tax rates, if those are less.simplesauce wrote: ↑Thu May 16, 2019 12:48 pm
Her preference is to continue holding these funds forever, and then give them to the family when she passes. As beneficiaries, there will be no tax consequence (correct?)
Answering you actual question how to quit playing with equity risk and not pay taxes is a different discussion which a couple of posters are debating as we go on.
Last edited by dbr on Thu May 16, 2019 8:44 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 1179
- Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2018 12:14 am
Re: We’ve won the game...but how do we stop playing?
Its more than a quote and I think it can be useful. It's just a metaphor, and a pretty good one at that. Metaphors are stories which help guide us. They are guides, not physics. And I think you are exactly right in the last part of your explanation.marcopolo wrote: ↑Thu May 16, 2019 12:51 pm It's a nice pithy quote, but I don't think it really has any useful meaning.
What "game" are you supposed to stop playing? Life still happens.
A lot of people interpret this to mean "lower your exposure to equity risks", but then you are just taking on different kinds of risk, inflation being a significant one.
Using this metaphor, I can think of my financial plan as a poker game. I like my pile of winnings. I've scooped them up and left the table. In reality, not totally...but I've taken enough off the table and turned it into a liability matched funds portion and two income annuities and VTINX (target date retirement income fund). OK, and a bunch of pesky individual stocks in taxable still leftover from my Fidelity advisory mistake days.
I think it's an excellent metaphor. Not perfect. Think poker game. Using Marcopolo's intepretation, I've lowered my risk substantially.
Re: We’ve won the game...but how do we stop playing?
Bernstein means that the game is amassing enough wealth to meet your objectives by investing in stocks and that when a person has accumulated the wealth he needs, then he shouldn't hold stocks anymore. I don't know why one needs a metaphor rather than just saying so in plain English.SevenBridgesRoad wrote: ↑Thu May 16, 2019 8:43 pmIts more than a quote and I think it can be useful. It's just a metaphor, and a pretty good one at that. Metaphors are stories which help guide us. They are guides, not physics. And I think you are exactly right in the last part of your explanation.marcopolo wrote: ↑Thu May 16, 2019 12:51 pm It's a nice pithy quote, but I don't think it really has any useful meaning.
What "game" are you supposed to stop playing? Life still happens.
A lot of people interpret this to mean "lower your exposure to equity risks", but then you are just taking on different kinds of risk, inflation being a significant one.
Using this metaphor, I can think of my financial plan as a poker game. I like my pile of winnings. I've scooped them up and left the table. In reality, not totally...but I've taken enough off the table and turned it into a liability matched funds portion and two income annuities and VTINX (target date retirement income fund). OK, and a bunch of pesky individual stocks in taxable still leftover from my Fidelity advisory mistake days.
I think it's an excellent metaphor. Not perfect. Think poker game. Using Marcopolo's intepretation, I've lowered my risk substantially.
-
- Posts: 1179
- Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2018 12:14 am
Re: We’ve won the game...but how do we stop playing?
I'm certain some people don't benefit from metaphors. But it seems many (most?) people do. If you get a chance and are interested, read up on metaphors. Fascinating topic.dbr wrote: ↑Thu May 16, 2019 8:50 pmBernstein means that the game is amassing enough wealth to meet your objectives by investing in stocks and that when a person has accumulated the wealth he needs, then he shouldn't hold stocks anymore. I don't know why one needs a metaphor rather than just saying so in plain English.SevenBridgesRoad wrote: ↑Thu May 16, 2019 8:43 pmmarcopolo wrote: ↑Thu May 16, 2019 12:51 pm It's a nice pithy quote, but I don't think it really has any useful meaning.
What "game" are you supposed to stop playing? Life still happens.
A lot of people interpret this to mean "lower your exposure to equity risks", but then you are just taking on different kinds of risk, inflation being a significant one.
I think it's an excellent metaphor. Not perfect. Think poker game. Using Marcopolo's intepretation, I've lowered my risk substantially.
Re: We’ve won the game...but how do we stop playing?
Howdy
Sounds like Grandma knows what she is doing. Maybe you could learn something from her.
Happy step ups on the basis
W B
Sounds like Grandma knows what she is doing. Maybe you could learn something from her.
Happy step ups on the basis
W B
"Through chances various, through all vicissitudes, we make our way." Virgil, The Aeneid
- arcticpineapplecorp.
- Posts: 15014
- Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2012 8:22 pm
Re: We’ve won the game...but how do we stop playing?
To the OP: these are good recommendations above. Start there.b42 wrote: ↑Thu May 16, 2019 12:52 pm A small first step is to direct dividends to the Total Stock Market/Total Bond Market instead of the sector funds (assuming that is what she wants to do).
Second, does she have "space" available to sell any amount of funds at a 0% capital gains rate?
Third, does she donate to any charities/organizations? If they accept it, she could gift appreciated stock instead and hold onto the cash.
nice job b42.
It's hard to accept the truth when the lies were exactly what you wanted to hear. Investing is simple, but not easy. Buy, hold & rebalance low cost index funds & manage taxable events. Asking Portfolio Questions |
-
- Posts: 47
- Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 6:08 pm
Re: We’ve won the game...but how do we stop playing?
My interpretation of Bernstein’s metaphor, which i believe is correct, assumes an investor has a target nest egg. You run the simulations with your withdrawal amount/rate/etc, various AAs, lock in a few assumptions, and play it out for your desired timeframe. If you don’t run out of money before that timeframe, you “have won the game”. Yes, the world could blow up, markets can crash, but if these events are far worse than what we’ve already experienced, the last thing i’m worrying about is my portfolio.....
But a serious concern is assuming too much risk near or just after retirement. I believe this is what Bernstein is emphasizing.
But a serious concern is assuming too much risk near or just after retirement. I believe this is what Bernstein is emphasizing.
Re: We’ve won the game...but how do we stop playing?
If I were in your shoes, I would wait until grandmother asked for my opinion or guidance.
Re: We’ve won the game...but how do we stop playing?
How many sectors do you need before you are invested in the total market?
-
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: Mon Nov 10, 2014 10:34 pm
Re: We’ve won the game...but how do we stop playing?
Your grandma sounds like a smart lady who has done really well. She may be a good example of someone who had a plan and “stayed the course” and it worked out for the best.