Interesting Take on the 3 Fund Model
-
- Posts: 57
- Joined: Fri Jul 20, 2018 10:15 pm
Interesting Take on the 3 Fund Model
1/3 in REIT index, 1/3 in Utilities Index, 1/3 in Blue Chips. A dividend-heavy long term plan for tax free accounts. Thoughts?
"Divide your portion to seven, or even to eight, for you do not know what misfortune may occur on the earth." Ecclesiastes 11:2
-
- Posts: 231
- Joined: Wed Oct 07, 2015 8:50 pm
Re: Interesting Take on the 3 Fund Model
I don’t think you’re proposed stock allocations will be well received by majority of posters on this board. Total return approach favored over focus on dividends. Typical recommendations are total US stock market, total international market, and total bond market. YMMV
-
- Posts: 996
- Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2017 4:03 am
Re: Interesting Take on the 3 Fund Model
No thank you!
Is it three funds? Yes.
Is it the three fund portfolio? No.
Is it three funds? Yes.
Is it the three fund portfolio? No.
-
- Posts: 4001
- Joined: Mon May 26, 2008 10:20 am
- Location: Second star on the right and straight on 'til morning
Re: Interesting Take on the 3 Fund Model
Welcome to the forum.
But, if not, best of luck. Let us know how it works out.
You might want to do a little more reading before you implement your plan. https://www.bogleheads.org/wiki/Getting_started
But, if not, best of luck. Let us know how it works out.
FI is the best revenge. LBYM. Invest the rest. Stay the course. Die anyway. - PS: The cavalry isn't coming, kids. You are on your own.
-
- Posts: 2866
- Joined: Wed Jul 10, 2013 2:59 pm
- Location: Metro ATL
Re: Interesting Take on the 3 Fund Model
List some examples of above funds.centennialstate wrote: ↑Wed Jul 25, 2018 12:28 am 1/3 in REIT index, 1/3 in Utilities Index, 1/3 in Blue Chips. A dividend-heavy long term plan for tax free accounts. Thoughts?
-
- Posts: 4798
- Joined: Sun Oct 08, 2017 7:16 pm
Re: Interesting Take on the 3 Fund Model
I wouldn't invest in any of these three funds!
Re: Interesting Take on the 3 Fund Model
I think this all-stock all-U.S. portfolio is likely to provided you with more volatility, less diversification, and lower total returns than an "uninteresting" three fund portfolio (us stock, intl stock, total bond).centennialstate wrote: ↑Wed Jul 25, 2018 12:28 am 1/3 in REIT index, 1/3 in Utilities Index, 1/3 in Blue Chips. A dividend-heavy long term plan for tax free accounts. Thoughts?
If you are seeking regular income, a combination of 60% Vanguard Managed Payout Fund (VPGDX) and 40% Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund Investor Shares (VTSMX) would provide similar income with less risk and better diversification.
"Far more money has been lost by investors preparing for corrections than has been lost in corrections themselves." ~~ Peter Lynch
Re: Interesting Take on the 3 Fund Model
The purpose of the 3 fund portfolio is to represent the total U.S stock market, the total U.S. Bond market, and the international market. Thus you get diversity, low cost, and minimize the risk of poorly performing sectors of the market. The key is not the number 3.
"Earn All You Can; Give All You Can; Save All You Can." .... John Wesley
Re: Interesting Take on the 3 Fund Model
Welcome to the forum, your first post! Your three fund model is already included in one of the now famous three fund portfolio funds (total stock market index). Keep investing simple. When dealing with the three funder new inventions and new discoveries are not needed--this is a good example of simplicity. Good luck y gracias por leer / cfscentennialstate wrote: ↑Wed Jul 25, 2018 12:28 am 1/3 in REIT index, 1/3 in Utilities Index, 1/3 in Blue Chips. A dividend-heavy long term plan for tax free accounts. Thoughts?
~ Member of the Active Retired Force since 2014 ~
Re: Interesting Take on the 3 Fund Model
This is extremely interest-rate sensitive and vulnerable to inflation and an associated hike in rates.
A robust portfolio is supposed to be able to cope with all sorts of environments.
This portfolio is not adequately diversified.
It would probably fail in many cycles in a Firecalc-like simulation.
A robust portfolio is supposed to be able to cope with all sorts of environments.
This portfolio is not adequately diversified.
It would probably fail in many cycles in a Firecalc-like simulation.
-
- Posts: 645
- Joined: Sat Dec 09, 2017 2:12 pm
Re: Interesting Take on the 3 Fund Model
Real Estate, Utilities & Blue Chips----and that's it?
1/3 in real estate gives me the willies. Most Americans hold most of their net worth in their primary residence. So, adding that in, the total holdings would be so very heavily R.E. slanted. Properties do not always appreciate; real estate goes through bubbles.
Blue Chips by their very name sound solid to beginning investors, but there are cycles when they plummet---restricting oneself to only those companies is the opposite of diversification.
Utilities also have cyclical ups and down----pinning 1/3 of all investments to this one sector is unwise.
I don't see any sense in this plan. I echo what others have said: read about the classic 3-fund portfolio that gives you broad diversification.
And good luck in learning more and making wise decisions that, over time, will bring you wealth....
1/3 in real estate gives me the willies. Most Americans hold most of their net worth in their primary residence. So, adding that in, the total holdings would be so very heavily R.E. slanted. Properties do not always appreciate; real estate goes through bubbles.
Blue Chips by their very name sound solid to beginning investors, but there are cycles when they plummet---restricting oneself to only those companies is the opposite of diversification.
Utilities also have cyclical ups and down----pinning 1/3 of all investments to this one sector is unwise.
I don't see any sense in this plan. I echo what others have said: read about the classic 3-fund portfolio that gives you broad diversification.
And good luck in learning more and making wise decisions that, over time, will bring you wealth....
I'd like to live as a poor man with lots of money. ~Pablo Picasso
- nisiprius
- Advisory Board
- Posts: 42899
- Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 9:33 am
- Location: The terrestrial, globular, planetary hunk of matter, flattened at the poles, is my abode.--O. Henry
Re: Interesting Take on the 3 Fund Model
This is not what is meant by the three-fund portfolio. The three-fund portfolio is not 100% stocks and it is not US-only.
You'll notice that Vanguard itself makes a rather unusual kind of presentation for a mutual fund company, on its web page for Sector and Specialty funds. Look at the points they make and the paragraphs they want you to read before they finally give you a link to their list of sector funds. It seems clear to me that are actually trying to discourage you from using their sector funds.
Just in case the original poster doesn't get around to it, obvious possibilities:niceguy7376 wrote: ↑Wed Jul 25, 2018 7:21 amList some examples of above funds.centennialstate wrote: ↑Wed Jul 25, 2018 12:28 am 1/3 in REIT index, 1/3 in Utilities Index, 1/3 in Blue Chips. A dividend-heavy long term plan for tax free accounts. Thoughts?
- the Vanguard Real Estate Index Fund, VGSIX, would do for REITs, or the same fund as an ETF, VNQ.
- The Vanguard Utilities Index ETF (VUI), or mutual fund (VUIAX but it has a $100,000 minimum!)
- "Blue chips" are not really well defined, but I am thinking personally that the "purest" realization of "blue chips" would probably be DIA (an ETF that actually tracks the Dow). Another possibility is the Vanguard Mega Cap ETF (MGC).
You'll notice that Vanguard itself makes a rather unusual kind of presentation for a mutual fund company, on its web page for Sector and Specialty funds. Look at the points they make and the paragraphs they want you to read before they finally give you a link to their list of sector funds. It seems clear to me that are actually trying to discourage you from using their sector funds.
A narrower focus brings higher risk
Sector and specialty mutual funds give you access to a very small part of the overall market, like health care, energy, or telecommunications.
Though many of these narrowly focused funds have the potential to grow, you should be equally prepared to experience wide swings in the value of your investments—including potentially large losses.
Get access to specific sectors without the additional risk
If you're not comfortable with the increased risk and volatility that sector and specialty funds present, consider Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund for broad coverage of the major industries in one fully diversified fund.
For similar exposure to non-U.S. stocks, consider Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund.
Get details on Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund
Get details on Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund
Choose a specific sector or specialty fund
If your current portfolio is broadly diversified, you may already have the exposure to the sector you're interested in. Only consider increasing your exposure to narrowly focused funds if you're comfortable with—and can afford—the added risk.
See a complete list of Vanguard sector & specialty funds
Last edited by nisiprius on Wed Jul 25, 2018 8:45 am, edited 2 times in total.
Annual income twenty pounds, annual expenditure nineteen nineteen and six, result happiness; Annual income twenty pounds, annual expenditure twenty pounds ought and six, result misery.
Re: Interesting Take on the 3 Fund Model
If you replace the 1/3 Reit with 1/3 total stock market index and the 1/3 utility with 1/3 international and 1/3 blue with 1/3 bond, I am in.
Re: Interesting Take on the 3 Fund Model
It's not a crazy idea. Looks like the kind of portfolio my grandfather would have had. He was born in 1900, so was heavily influenced by the Great Depression. Probably better than most portfolios out there. It has a high risk of under performing the market, but who knows? Depending on how things go, it could be genius. As others have said, I would want to look at how it would perform over a wide variety of environments.centennialstate wrote: ↑Wed Jul 25, 2018 12:28 am 1/3 in REIT index, 1/3 in Utilities Index, 1/3 in Blue Chips. A dividend-heavy long term plan for tax free accounts. Thoughts?
My guess is that it will never do great, but it shouldn't do terrible either. If your portfolio is large enough not to require a lot of growth, you would be pretty much bulletproof. Personally, I'll never have a portfolio that large, so I'm pretty much forced to take a total returns approach. I have a colleague that puts 100% of his money in our 401K stable value fund, CDs, and savings accounts. Since he has always saved around 2/3 of his income, he'll do just fine, even with the low yields over the last ten years.
So, save around 50%, or more, of your income for 30 or 40 years and that portfolio should do just fine.

Re: Interesting Take on the 3 Fund Model
OP: I don't think it means what you think it means.
-
- Posts: 57
- Joined: Fri Jul 20, 2018 10:15 pm
Re: Interesting Take on the 3 Fund Model
Thanks sreynard! I'll post my reasons for this approach for those interested.
1. I like dividends over growth. It's real money.
2. I like real estate in general. Plus the Vanguard REIT fund has a good track record.
3. For philosophical reasons, I don't care for FAANG and many of the industries in the larger market.
4. I'm young and don't care for bonds.
5. In the interest of "being fearful when others are greedy" (and I guess whatever the healthy reciprocal of that is) I like having a portfolio that doesn't necessarily do what the market does. So whatever.
I understand that this isn't THE three fund model. But when I started reading about it, I noticed that it had thirds like my model, is passive like my model, and that my model is potentially more aggressive. Thanks for your thoughts, y'all.
1. I like dividends over growth. It's real money.
2. I like real estate in general. Plus the Vanguard REIT fund has a good track record.
3. For philosophical reasons, I don't care for FAANG and many of the industries in the larger market.
4. I'm young and don't care for bonds.
5. In the interest of "being fearful when others are greedy" (and I guess whatever the healthy reciprocal of that is) I like having a portfolio that doesn't necessarily do what the market does. So whatever.
I understand that this isn't THE three fund model. But when I started reading about it, I noticed that it had thirds like my model, is passive like my model, and that my model is potentially more aggressive. Thanks for your thoughts, y'all.
"Divide your portion to seven, or even to eight, for you do not know what misfortune may occur on the earth." Ecclesiastes 11:2
Re: Interesting Take on the 3 Fund Model
This belief is counter to your long-term financial interests. "Growth" and "dividends" are both equally real money.centennialstate wrote: ↑Wed Jul 25, 2018 10:43 am Thanks sreynard! I'll post my reasons for this approach for those interested.
1. I like dividends over growth. It's real money.
This belief is counter to your long-term financial interests. Looking at past returns is a sure fire way to lose your shirt.centennialstate wrote: ↑Wed Jul 25, 2018 10:43 am2. I like real estate in general. Plus the Vanguard REIT fund has a good track record.
No comment.centennialstate wrote: ↑Wed Jul 25, 2018 10:43 am3. For philosophical reasons, I don't care for FAANG and many of the industries in the larger market.
That's fine as far as it goes, but then why build a portfolio engineered to provided current income?
This one makes no sense to me: it's fine as a mantra, but nonsensical as an investment policy especially in the context of the portfolio you proposed.centennialstate wrote: ↑Wed Jul 25, 2018 10:43 am5. In the interest of "being fearful when others are greedy" (and I guess whatever the healthy reciprocal of that is) I like having a portfolio that doesn't necessarily do what the market does.
"Far more money has been lost by investors preparing for corrections than has been lost in corrections themselves." ~~ Peter Lynch
-
- Posts: 57
- Joined: Fri Jul 20, 2018 10:15 pm
The Guy with the Weird Portfolio
[Thread merged into here, see below. --admin LadyGeek]
Hey guys,
I'm the new guy who asked you all what you thought of my 1/3 REIT, 1/3 Utilities, and 1/3 Blue Chip model. After contemplating your replies and following up with a couple of specific responders, I'd love to know what you think about this proposed portfolio. Specifically, whether it is more reasonable and Boglehead-esque. Keep in mind this is long-term, non-tax.
Ballast Portion (20%)
USA REIT (VNQ) 15%
INT REIT (VNQI) 5%
Sail Portion (80%)
Industrials ETF (VIS) 40%
Utilities ETF (VPU) 10%
Materials ETF (VAW) 10%
My 2 Favorite Blue Chips 20%
Don't ask me why I'm so complicated.
Hey guys,
I'm the new guy who asked you all what you thought of my 1/3 REIT, 1/3 Utilities, and 1/3 Blue Chip model. After contemplating your replies and following up with a couple of specific responders, I'd love to know what you think about this proposed portfolio. Specifically, whether it is more reasonable and Boglehead-esque. Keep in mind this is long-term, non-tax.
Ballast Portion (20%)
USA REIT (VNQ) 15%
INT REIT (VNQI) 5%
Sail Portion (80%)
Industrials ETF (VIS) 40%
Utilities ETF (VPU) 10%
Materials ETF (VAW) 10%
My 2 Favorite Blue Chips 20%
Don't ask me why I'm so complicated.
"Divide your portion to seven, or even to eight, for you do not know what misfortune may occur on the earth." Ecclesiastes 11:2
Re: The Guy with the Weird Portfolio
No. Less diversification is not better and also not the Boglehead way.
Re: The Guy with the Weird Portfolio
A slicer-and-dicer can come up with thousands of strategys. Your slicing seems to ignore technology and healthcare and probably a lot of other areas. For me it's just a whole lot simpler, and likely cheaper, to go with a total stock market index fund/etf. If you focus on market segments you have no certainty that you are picking correctly. If an investor goes with a total stock market index fund/etf they will basically never get more (or less) than the market performance (of course minus the expense ratio). To me that's the winning option, but we can all pick and play our cards differently.
The closest helping hand is at the end of your own arm.
-
- Posts: 2550
- Joined: Mon Feb 01, 2016 11:49 am
Re: The Guy with the Weird Portfolio
Why these specific sectors with those specific ratios?
So just 2 companies = 20% of your portfolio because you like the companies? Hopefully the companies are not the upcoming Kodak and Nokia.
You are missing dozens of other sections (Automotive, Finance, Healthcare,..etc) why you don't want to hold these profitable sectors?
Why you don't want to hold the entire market?
Have you read this https://www.etf.com/docs/IfYouCan.pdf ?
My 2 Favorite Blue Chips 20%
So just 2 companies = 20% of your portfolio because you like the companies? Hopefully the companies are not the upcoming Kodak and Nokia.
You are missing dozens of other sections (Automotive, Finance, Healthcare,..etc) why you don't want to hold these profitable sectors?
Why you don't want to hold the entire market?
Have you read this https://www.etf.com/docs/IfYouCan.pdf ?
"One of the funny things about stock market, every time one is buying another is selling, and both think they are astute" - William Feather
- White Coat Investor
- Posts: 15157
- Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 9:11 pm
- Location: Greatest Snow On Earth
Re: The Guy with the Weird Portfolio
Why are you making so many big bets? You must be much more confident in your crystal ball than I am in mine. Why not share the reasoning behind each piece of your portfolio and see if we can help you shoot some holes in your reasoning. If we can't, you'll be much more confident in your plan. If we can, you'll be glad we did.
1) Invest you must 2) Time is your friend 3) Impulse is your enemy |
4) Basic arithmetic works 5) Stick to simplicity 6) Stay the course
Re: The Guy with the Weird Portfolio
I'm concerned by your "Ballast" and "Sail" designations. Are you sure you don't have them backwards? If not, how did you go about classifying the individual items? All of that stuff is pretty stodgy (ballast?) but REITs in particular didn't do well at all during the 2008-2009 financial crisis. They are highly dependent on credit and of course the entire real estate industry was under duress, a real double-whammy for REITs. Industrials seem like an . . . interesting choice for the largest slice, not sure why you chose that. What's the reasoning that leads you to concentrate so much risk in two blue chips?centennialstate wrote: ↑Mon Jul 30, 2018 9:12 pm Ballast Portion (20%)
USA REIT (VNQ) 15%
INT REIT (VNQI) 5%
Sail Portion (80%)
Industrials ETF (VIS) 40%
Utilities ETF (VPU) 10%
Materials ETF (VAW) 10%
My 2 Favorite Blue Chips 20%
I guess I just don't understand what you are trying to accomplish overall or any of the reasons behind the individual selections. Looking at your other posts, you seem to be focused on dividends, but that's not the best way to maximize your returns; there are plenty of discussions about that on Bogleheads.
Maybe take a couple of steps back to look at the bigger picture, starting with your purpose for investing, goals, etc.
https://www.bogleheads.org/wiki/Investm ... _statement
Re: The Guy with the Weird Portfolio
Why are you so complicated?centennialstate wrote: ↑Mon Jul 30, 2018 9:12 pm Hey guys,
I'm the new guy who asked you all what you thought of my 1/3 REIT, 1/3 Utilities, and 1/3 Blue Chip model. After contemplating your replies and following up with a couple of specific responders, I'd love to know what you think about this proposed portfolio. Specifically, whether it is more reasonable and Boglehead-esque. Keep in mind this is long-term, non-tax.
Ballast Portion (20%)
USA REIT (VNQ) 15%
INT REIT (VNQI) 5%
Sail Portion (80%)
Industrials ETF (VIS) 40%
Utilities ETF (VPU) 10%
Materials ETF (VAW) 10%
My 2 Favorite Blue Chips 20%
Don't ask me why I'm so complicated.
Amateur investors are not cool-headed logicians.
Re: The Guy with the Weird Portfolio
You seem to be betting on the old economy and shunning the new economy. Also a heavy cyclical tilt.
-
- Posts: 2456
- Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2018 3:17 am
Re: The Guy with the Weird Portfolio
Nobody can actually know what the best portfolio will be.centennialstate wrote: ↑Mon Jul 30, 2018 9:12 pm Hey guys,
I'm the new guy who asked you all what you thought of my 1/3 REIT, 1/3 Utilities, and 1/3 Blue Chip model. After contemplating your replies and following up with a couple of specific responders, I'd love to know what you think about this proposed portfolio. Specifically, whether it is more reasonable and Boglehead-esque. Keep in mind this is long-term, non-tax.
Ballast Portion (20%)
USA REIT (VNQ) 15%
INT REIT (VNQI) 5%
Sail Portion (80%)
Industrials ETF (VIS) 40%
Utilities ETF (VPU) 10%
Materials ETF (VAW) 10%
My 2 Favorite Blue Chips 20%
Don't ask me why I'm so complicated.
So sure, yours is fine. I’d be more comfortable diversifying the blue chips into international equities.
Anyway, I bet within five years time you are back at it with a new theory to test.
It’s interesting for a while to see how your pet idea plays out, and then you’ll think what if I ...
That doesn’t really work out though because you’ll be too tempted to sell VAW or whatever if it’s been lousy and seems it will stay that way. And you’ll increase your allocation to some new blue chip or whatever because it’s done well or looks promising or whatever.
Seems reasonable right! Well I don’t think that’ll work out as well as you hope.
Pick an allocation you’ll have solid ground to stick with even in the face of doubt.
-
- Posts: 10789
- Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2017 8:39 pm
Re: The Guy with the Weird Portfolio
One of the stranger portfolios I’ve seen. Best of luck not only with the portfolio, but your ability to not change the strategy.
-
- Posts: 996
- Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2017 4:03 am
Re: The Guy with the Weird Portfolio
Since you like "complicated", maybe try a hybrid of sorts?
30% US Total Stock Market Index Fund
20% Total International Index Fund
20% Total Bond Market Index Fund
and 30% "complicated" (in no more than 5% chunks -- allows for 6 "complications")
Just a thought!
30% US Total Stock Market Index Fund
20% Total International Index Fund
20% Total Bond Market Index Fund
and 30% "complicated" (in no more than 5% chunks -- allows for 6 "complications")
Just a thought!
Re: The Guy with the Weird Portfolio
centennialstate wrote: ↑Mon Jul 30, 2018 9:12 pm I'd love to know what you think about this proposed portfolio. Specifically, whether it is more reasonable and Boglehead-esque.
Bogleheads Investment Philisophy
https://www.bogleheads.org/wiki/Boglehe ... philosophy
80 percent of your portfolio is in 3 specific sectors and 2 stocks. That is not Boglehead-ish or even Boglehead-adjacent.Rather than trying to pick the specific securities or sectors of the market (US stocks, international stocks, and US bonds) that will outperform in the future, Bogleheads buy funds that are widely diversified, or even approximate the whole market.
Industrials, Utilities, and Materials are only 20 percent of the US total market. You completely ignore international equities which are about half the market. So you're making a huge gamble on 10 percent of the global stock market.
Your portfolio isn't complicated and being complicated isn't a virtue.
It's a simple portfolio of 6 funds that is a bad idea.
"Don't trust everything you read on the Internet"- Abraham Lincoln
Re: The Guy with the Weird Portfolio
We won't... as long as you don't ask us to call you reasonable or like a Boglehead.


Re: The Guy with the Weird Portfolio
This nails the issue.denovo wrote: ↑Tue Jul 31, 2018 4:43 am 80 percent of your portfolio is in 3 specific sectors and 2 stocks. That is not Boglehead-ish or even Boglehead-adjacent.
Industrials, Utilities, and Materials are only 20 percent of the US total market. You completely ignore international equities which are about half the market. So you're making a huge gamble on 10 percent of the global stock market.
Your portfolio isn't complicated and being complicated isn't a virtue.
It's a simple portfolio of 6 funds that is a bad idea.
"Far more money has been lost by investors preparing for corrections than has been lost in corrections themselves." ~~ Peter Lynch
-
- Posts: 90
- Joined: Fri Nov 21, 2014 8:39 am
Re: The Guy with the Weird Portfolio
I can see the extra asset allocation to US and International REIT's as I believe real estate investments are underrepresented in public equity. However, why don't you put the rest in Vanguard FTSE All World and call it a day?
No bonds? Why?
VinhoVerde
No bonds? Why?
VinhoVerde
-
- Posts: 13294
- Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2013 7:05 am
- Location: 26 miles, 385 yards west of Copley Square
Re: The Guy with the Weird Portfolio
It's not at all complicated. It's a simple, concentrated portfolio of poor choices. Sorry.
See that haystack:?
Any stock, fund, bond, note that says "REIT", you should really delve into what it is. Many have zero real estate component and when you go under the hood, you might find that they simply deal with credit default swaps (watch the movie The Big Short, or remember why 2008 happened).
If you want to "do something", maybe find a hobby. Buy a racecar and head to the track. It'll be less expensive and the downturns are caused either by your mistake or by a mistake of a fellow driver.
See that haystack:?
By buying these in allocation percentages that match your risk tolerance, you cover the entire market.US Total Stock Market Index Fund
Total International Index Fund
Total Bond Market Index Fund
Any stock, fund, bond, note that says "REIT", you should really delve into what it is. Many have zero real estate component and when you go under the hood, you might find that they simply deal with credit default swaps (watch the movie The Big Short, or remember why 2008 happened).
If you want to "do something", maybe find a hobby. Buy a racecar and head to the track. It'll be less expensive and the downturns are caused either by your mistake or by a mistake of a fellow driver.
Bogle: Smart Beta is stupid
-
- Posts: 42171
- Joined: Fri May 11, 2007 11:07 am
Re: The Guy with the Weird Portfolio
Are you comfortable that you would have underperformed, at a guess 20%, in the last year?centennialstate wrote: ↑Mon Jul 30, 2018 9:12 pm Hey guys,
I'm the new guy who asked you all what you thought of my 1/3 REIT, 1/3 Utilities, and 1/3 Blue Chip model. After contemplating your replies and following up with a couple of specific responders, I'd love to know what you think about this proposed portfolio. Specifically, whether it is more reasonable and Boglehead-esque. Keep in mind this is long-term, non-tax.
Ballast Portion (20%)
USA REIT (VNQ) 15%
INT REIT (VNQI) 5%
Sail Portion (80%)
Industrials ETF (VIS) 40%
Utilities ETF (VPU) 10%
Materials ETF (VAW) 10%
My 2 Favorite Blue Chips 20%
Don't ask me why I'm so complicated.
You have industrials which means you have taken full force of GE downgrade.
And you don't have the FAANGs so you have missed the upside.
You are basically throwing away diversification benefits (higher volatility and lower returns). One has to ask: why?
-
- Posts: 2866
- Joined: Wed Jul 10, 2013 2:59 pm
- Location: Metro ATL
Re: The Guy with the Weird Portfolio
OP,
I am getting bored of the message that I and other bogleheads have been dishing out here for a long time (KISS - Keep it Simple, Three fund portfolio etc). It is getting stale for me to preach as well.
PLEASE PLEASE do bring in a new scent into the forum and go ahead and invest as per your plan and update us simple folks on yearly basis how you are doing and if you had any change of heart.
I am getting bored of the message that I and other bogleheads have been dishing out here for a long time (KISS - Keep it Simple, Three fund portfolio etc). It is getting stale for me to preach as well.
PLEASE PLEASE do bring in a new scent into the forum and go ahead and invest as per your plan and update us simple folks on yearly basis how you are doing and if you had any change of heart.
-
- Posts: 42171
- Joined: Fri May 11, 2007 11:07 am
Re: The Guy with the Weird Portfolio
Other than the market timer saga, where he bravely took us through his efforts and struggles, generally I think that posters either decide they were mistaken, or they disappear from here.niceguy7376 wrote: ↑Tue Jul 31, 2018 8:01 am OP,
I am getting bored of the message that I and other bogleheads have been dishing out here for a long time (KISS - Keep it Simple, Three fund portfolio etc). It is getting stale for me to preach as well.
PLEASE PLEASE do bring in a new scent into the forum and go ahead and invest as per your plan and update us simple folks on yearly basis how you are doing and if you had any change of heart.
I am thinking of the various crypto-currency zealots. You do get waves of (personal) real estate investing -- where more experienced posters here then contribute their own sufferings and triumphs in this area. I think you'd have to say that the latter is perfectly legit albeit peripheral to the messages of this Forum.
But when the strategy goes wrong, unless your name is market timer, you usually go off and nurse your wounds. Warnings here are not usually paid attention to.
It's more rewarding to try to help people whose investment strategies have gone wrong (usually due to bad "advisors") and help them sort themselves out, or those just beginning their investment careers and need to understand asset allocation etc*. I do cringe though when we hit another Private Label REIT fiasco - there really are parts of the financial services industry that are just geared to rip off.
* the older and wiser a head you have around here, the more you believe in a bond weighting. I think that is an observable truth.
- jimb_fromATL
- Posts: 2278
- Joined: Sun Nov 10, 2013 12:00 pm
- Location: Atlanta area & Piedmont Triad NC and Interstate 85 in between.
Re: The Guy with the Weird Portfolio
The great recovery since the second worst crash in history in 2008 makes it hard to evaluate any portfolio during that time alone, since you'd have to work pretty hard to NOT do extremely well. However, the crash of 2008 does give us a chance to see how various balances of funds might perform next time around.
I thought it might be interesting to use PortfolioVisualizer to compare your portfolio to the bogleheads 3 fund portfolio, the total stock market (VTSMX), the S&P 500 (VFINX), and Vanguard's Wellington balanced fund VWELX.
I don’t see where you listed specifically which blue chips you like, so I substituted DIA (the Spyder Dow index ETF). The limited time frame for VNQI data does not include the big crash. VNQI did not do as well a VNQ anyway, so I substituted VNQ for the whole 20% in real estate in order to include the crash of 2008
Also as might be expected,your portfolio had substantially worse drawdown in bad years. That would be bad if you needed to retire at a time your portfolio is down a lot more than others.
And as with most portfolios I've seen that have narrow focus and choices made with either technical indicators or dartboard technology, it has not done as well as just buying the S&P 500 or the total stock market and leaving them alone.
It would be mildly interesting (though not really proof of anything) to plug in your specific blue chip stocks in Portfolio Visualizer to see if your crystal ball for picking 2 stocks worked better than the index for the Dow or better than the 500 or total market.
jimb
I thought it might be interesting to use PortfolioVisualizer to compare your portfolio to the bogleheads 3 fund portfolio, the total stock market (VTSMX), the S&P 500 (VFINX), and Vanguard's Wellington balanced fund VWELX.
I don’t see where you listed specifically which blue chips you like, so I substituted DIA (the Spyder Dow index ETF). The limited time frame for VNQI data does not include the big crash. VNQI did not do as well a VNQ anyway, so I substituted VNQ for the whole 20% in real estate in order to include the crash of 2008
- Incidentally, a great feature of PortfolioVisualizer is that it allows you to compare the results for periodic contributions –- Dollar Cost Averaging -- with monthly or annual contributions more like you’d invest in an IRA or 401(k) instead of a single lump sum. (Other than IRA rollovers, most people do not invest a single lump sum and never add anything else. And the results for a single lump can be very misleading depending on whether the deposit was made near the top or bottom of a good or bad year in the market.)
You can also download Portfolio's very comprehensive analysis of fund performance to a spreadsheet, and it includes among other things the worst drawdown periods and time to recover.
Also as might be expected,your portfolio had substantially worse drawdown in bad years. That would be bad if you needed to retire at a time your portfolio is down a lot more than others.
And as with most portfolios I've seen that have narrow focus and choices made with either technical indicators or dartboard technology, it has not done as well as just buying the S&P 500 or the total stock market and leaving them alone.
Code: Select all
Portfolio Analysis Results (Jan 2005 - Jun 2018)
$400 per month contributions
Portfolio Balance TWRR MWRR Best Yr Worst Yr Max. Drawdown
Weird $11,911 8.73% 10.19% 27.13% -37.19% -55.16%
Bogleheads $9,903 6.99% 7.79% 26.55% -30.74% -43.83%
VWELX $10,296 7.67% 8.30% 22.20% -22.30% -32.53%
VTSMX $12,453 8.59% 10.77% 33.35% -37.04% -50.89%
VFINX $12,283 8.28% 10.59% 32.18% -37.02% -50.97%
jimb
Re: The Guy with the Weird Portfolio
Well, centennialstate, you asked.
How did you come up with those sectors? Do you have some special information? Gut feeling? Past returns? If your goal is to beat the market, perhaps you have a chance, but you will also have 4 chances of underperforming a Boglehead portfolio.
REITs certainly cannot be considered "ballast." They can be 50% more volatile than total market.
In the end, if that's what you want, then be tough and hold it--at all times.
Paul

How did you come up with those sectors? Do you have some special information? Gut feeling? Past returns? If your goal is to beat the market, perhaps you have a chance, but you will also have 4 chances of underperforming a Boglehead portfolio.
REITs certainly cannot be considered "ballast." They can be 50% more volatile than total market.
In the end, if that's what you want, then be tough and hold it--at all times.

Paul
Last edited by pkcrafter on Thu Aug 02, 2018 12:02 am, edited 3 times in total.
When times are good, investors tend to forget about risk and focus on opportunity. When times are bad, investors tend to forget about opportunity and focus on risk.
- Sandtrap
- Posts: 12813
- Joined: Sat Nov 26, 2016 6:32 pm
- Location: Hawaii No Ka Oi , N. Arizona
- Contact:
Re: The Guy with the Weird Portfolio
I don't understand your choices and reasoning behind this long term? strategy.centennialstate wrote: ↑Mon Jul 30, 2018 9:12 pm Hey guys,
I'm the new guy who asked you all what you thought of my 1/3 REIT, 1/3 Utilities, and 1/3 Blue Chip model. After contemplating your replies and following up with a couple of specific responders, I'd love to know what you think about this proposed portfolio. Specifically, whether it is more reasonable and Boglehead-esque. Keep in mind this is long-term, non-tax.
Ballast Portion (20%)
USA REIT (VNQ) 15%
INT REIT (VNQI) 5%
Sail Portion (80%)
Industrials ETF (VIS) 40%
Utilities ETF (VPU) 10%
Materials ETF (VAW) 10%
My 2 Favorite Blue Chips 20%
Don't ask me why I'm so complicated.
Would you care to explain?
Somewhat along the lines of "pkcrafter". I'd like to understand your approach.
Also, what is "Sail Portion", "Ballast Portion"???
What are your 2 favorite blue chips specifically?
Thanks for the help.
j

Re: The Guy with the Weird Portfolio
Perhaps you could call this the Dartboard Portfolio. It seems that is how the selections were chosen.
Re: The Guy with the Weird Portfolio
Sounds like someone who likes real assets and real products who doesn't much care for tech an services. Not sure your preferences should bleed that far into your portfolio. Also I wouldn't marry myself to any individual stock. A trade? sure. But an allocation -- that's dangerous.
Why not something like this
20% Reits
20% Industrials
60% Total Stock
That gets some heavy Industrial and Real Estate exposure without going all in on crazy
Why not something like this
20% Reits
20% Industrials
60% Total Stock
That gets some heavy Industrial and Real Estate exposure without going all in on crazy

Re: The Guy with the Weird Portfolio
Topic moved to Investing - Help with Personal Investments.
-
- Posts: 57
- Joined: Fri Jul 20, 2018 10:15 pm
Weird Portfolio Guy Returns
[Thread merged into here, see below (next page). --admin LadyGeek]
I appreciate everybody's input from my last two posts...
Post #1 (theme: new guy, not from around here)
viewtopic.php?f=10&t=254777&p=4035699#p4035699
Post #2 (theme: guess I'm not a Boglehead after all)
viewtopic.php?f=1&t=255248&p=4044746#p4044746
After contemplating replies and doing some reading, I've concluded that I'm not exactly a Boglehead after all. Having said that, I think my approach meets 9.5 out of the 10 points of the Bogleheads philosophy. The main thing that I've gleaned from you guys is the reality that I can easily have a more aggressive and more diversified portfolio at the same time. I think what I'm figuring out is that my approach to investing is the way I've lived my economic life...find a deal! This way of thinking, with the added input of Bogle thinking has led me to the idea of ETF rotation (although I don't think I see myself as a timer or regular trader). A last point to the repeated question of "why" from my last post...suffice it to say that there are major sectors and companies that I simply don't want to invest in.
The reason I say 9.5 of 10 is because #4 is "never try to time the market." While I don't want to spend my life in a perpetual cycle of "buying low and selling high," I think I also have a heightened awareness of the value of things. Guess I'll finish this post with a third portfolio proposition for y'all to either rip apart or praise. Dividing my portion to 8 (as would King Solomon), rather than 3 (as would Jack Bogle) or 4 (as would Dave Ramsey).
Sector Funds: 80%
USA Real Estate ETF (VNQ) 20%
Utilities ETF (VPU) 20%
Industrials ETF (VIS) 20%
Materials ETF (VAW) 20%
Blue Chips: 20%
Lockheed Martin (LMT) 5%
Caterpillar Incorporated (CAT) 5%
3M Corporation (MMM) 5%
Union Pacific Corporation (UNP) 5%
I appreciate everybody's input from my last two posts...
Post #1 (theme: new guy, not from around here)
viewtopic.php?f=10&t=254777&p=4035699#p4035699
Post #2 (theme: guess I'm not a Boglehead after all)
viewtopic.php?f=1&t=255248&p=4044746#p4044746
After contemplating replies and doing some reading, I've concluded that I'm not exactly a Boglehead after all. Having said that, I think my approach meets 9.5 out of the 10 points of the Bogleheads philosophy. The main thing that I've gleaned from you guys is the reality that I can easily have a more aggressive and more diversified portfolio at the same time. I think what I'm figuring out is that my approach to investing is the way I've lived my economic life...find a deal! This way of thinking, with the added input of Bogle thinking has led me to the idea of ETF rotation (although I don't think I see myself as a timer or regular trader). A last point to the repeated question of "why" from my last post...suffice it to say that there are major sectors and companies that I simply don't want to invest in.
The reason I say 9.5 of 10 is because #4 is "never try to time the market." While I don't want to spend my life in a perpetual cycle of "buying low and selling high," I think I also have a heightened awareness of the value of things. Guess I'll finish this post with a third portfolio proposition for y'all to either rip apart or praise. Dividing my portion to 8 (as would King Solomon), rather than 3 (as would Jack Bogle) or 4 (as would Dave Ramsey).
Sector Funds: 80%
USA Real Estate ETF (VNQ) 20%
Utilities ETF (VPU) 20%
Industrials ETF (VIS) 20%
Materials ETF (VAW) 20%
Blue Chips: 20%
Lockheed Martin (LMT) 5%
Caterpillar Incorporated (CAT) 5%
3M Corporation (MMM) 5%
Union Pacific Corporation (UNP) 5%
"Divide your portion to seven, or even to eight, for you do not know what misfortune may occur on the earth." Ecclesiastes 11:2
-
- Posts: 57
- Joined: Fri Jul 20, 2018 10:15 pm
Re: The Guy with the Weird Portfolio
"Divide your portion to seven, or even to eight, for you do not know what misfortune may occur on the earth." Ecclesiastes 11:2
-
- Posts: 57
- Joined: Fri Jul 20, 2018 10:15 pm
Re: Interesting Take on the 3 Fund Model
"Divide your portion to seven, or even to eight, for you do not know what misfortune may occur on the earth." Ecclesiastes 11:2
Re: Weird Portfolio Guy Returns
Here, take this quiz from memory only without looking up any answers:
If you can't answer these basic questions about your potential investments, stick to broad index funds.Name three of the top ten holdings of each of the following four ETFs:
USA Real Estate ETF (VNQ)
Utilities ETF (VPU)
Industrials ETF (VIS)
Materials ETF (VAW)
Name three specific pieces of military equipment made by Lockheed Martin (LMT).
Name three brands (other than Caterpillar) that Caterpillar Incorporated (CAT) owns.
Name three subsidiaries of 3M Corporation (MMM).
Name the major competitor of Union Pacific Corporation (UNP) west of the Mississippi.
Re: Weird Portfolio Guy Returns
I don’t think you will get any praise for these sector portfolios here. You might get a better reception over at the Morningstar forums.
http://socialize.morningstar.com/NewSoc ... fault.aspx
http://socialize.morningstar.com/NewSoc ... fault.aspx
-
- Posts: 2456
- Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2018 3:17 am
Re: Weird Portfolio Guy Returns
That's better than not investing in anything.centennialstate wrote: ↑Wed Aug 01, 2018 11:31 pm I appreciate everybody's input from my last two posts...
Post #1 (theme: new guy, not from around here)
viewtopic.php?f=10&t=254777&p=4035699#p4035699
Post #2 (theme: guess I'm not a Boglehead after all)
viewtopic.php?f=1&t=255248&p=4044746#p4044746
After contemplating replies and doing some reading, I've concluded that I'm not exactly a Boglehead after all. Having said that, I think my approach meets 9.5 out of the 10 points of the Bogleheads philosophy. The main thing that I've gleaned from you guys is the reality that I can easily have a more aggressive and more diversified portfolio at the same time. I think what I'm figuring out is that my approach to investing is the way I've lived my economic life...find a deal! This way of thinking, with the added input of Bogle thinking has led me to the idea of ETF rotation (although I don't think I see myself as a timer or regular trader). A last point to the repeated question of "why" from my last post...suffice it to say that there are major sectors and companies that I simply don't want to invest in.
The reason I say 9.5 of 10 is because #4 is "never try to time the market." While I don't want to spend my life in a perpetual cycle of "buying low and selling high," I think I also have a heightened awareness of the value of things. Guess I'll finish this post with a third portfolio proposition for y'all to either rip apart or praise. Dividing my portion to 8 (as would King Solomon), rather than 3 (as would Jack Bogle) or 4 (as would Dave Ramsey).
Sector Funds: 80%
USA Real Estate ETF (VNQ) 20%
Utilities ETF (VPU) 20%
Industrials ETF (VIS) 20%
Materials ETF (VAW) 20%
Blue Chips: 20%
Lockheed Martin (LMT) 5%
Caterpillar Incorporated (CAT) 5%
3M Corporation (MMM) 5%
Union Pacific Corporation (UNP) 5%
It's probably safer than bitcoins.
It's outperformed total market over the past 14 years or so. (as far back as I can see). Anyone can look at past results and find something that did that though. Doing so doesn't give you a leg up heading into the future though.
The road here is littered with many great ideas that people regretted. It's why we target broader market diversification.
Alls I know is that CAT will not be seeing the 75% returns it did in 2017 anytime soon. Of that much I am sure.
Re: Weird Portfolio Guy Returns
That's great thinking.Pajamas wrote: ↑Thu Aug 02, 2018 12:03 am Here, take this quiz from memory only without looking up any answers:
If you can't answer these basic questions about your potential investments, stick to broad index funds.Name three of the top ten holdings of each of the following four ETFs:
USA Real Estate ETF (VNQ)
Utilities ETF (VPU)
Industrials ETF (VIS)
Materials ETF (VAW)
Name three specific pieces of military equipment made by Lockheed Martin (LMT).
Name three brands (other than Caterpillar) that Caterpillar Incorporated (CAT) owns.
Name three subsidiaries of 3M Corporation (MMM).
Name the major competitor of Union Pacific Corporation (UNP) west of the Mississippi.
Re: Weird Portfolio Guy Returns
I read through your other portfolios and I notice a theme, with aversions to certain asset classes & market sectors, and concentrations in specific stocks.
With regards to stock picking, just know that your competition isn’t a bunch of dudes reading the Sunday paper and calling their broker, it’s a combination of economists, statisticians using some of the most powerful technology in the world. You don’t have to play that game.
Why are you averse to bonds, technology, international stocks? In an average bogleheads portfolio this could be 50% or more of the overall composition.
With regards to stock picking, just know that your competition isn’t a bunch of dudes reading the Sunday paper and calling their broker, it’s a combination of economists, statisticians using some of the most powerful technology in the world. You don’t have to play that game.
Why are you averse to bonds, technology, international stocks? In an average bogleheads portfolio this could be 50% or more of the overall composition.