Diversified portfolio but still too much Apple, Microsoft, etc.

Discuss all general (i.e. non-personal) investing questions and issues, investing news, and theory.
Post Reply
Oddball
Posts: 30
Joined: Thu May 03, 2018 9:35 am

Diversified portfolio but still too much Apple, Microsoft, etc.

Post by Oddball » Tue Jun 12, 2018 1:42 pm

After reading here for a bit my wife and I have moved our funds away from active management and are self directly towards a "3-fund" type portfolio (50% US, 25% International, 25% bonds ) within the limitations of our work sponsored 401k plans. Our non-401k funds are all at vanguard and therefore all of our "US Stocks" buckets there are filled with VTSAX (Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund). Now, while that fund holds 3629 stocks, the top 10 holdings account for 18% of the fund, with 2.8% of the fund being Apple (the largest single holding) followed by MicroSoft at 2.6%. I was surprised to see that our "very diversified portfolio" still has a couple thousand in Apple and Microsoft stock!

So basically I am wondering if there are large cap funds which exclude say the top 10 or 20 holdings. Alternatively, as we are still migrating over a last couple accounts which have been earmarked for VTSAX, maybe put those into small cap like VSMAX instead? Or, I guess I just don't have to think too much about it and just hold all the US stock in VTSAX....

User avatar
Pajamas
Posts: 6015
Joined: Sun Jun 03, 2012 6:32 pm

Re: Diversified portfolio but still too much Apple, Microsoft, etc.

Post by Pajamas » Tue Jun 12, 2018 1:49 pm

If it is only 5.4% of your portfolio, it is not anything to be overly concerned about. Many otherwise strict adherents to the Boglehead philosophy of investing do have a similar amount in individual stocks for various reasons including fun. You can always liquidate the holdings but consider taxes when timing sales.

https://www.google.com/search?q=site%3A ... stocks+fun

VTSAX is market weighted so you would expect the largest companies to constitute a significant percentage of the fund. Some people do think that the effect of a few large companies carrying so much weight is problematic but it does reflect current reality.

User avatar
Phineas J. Whoopee
Posts: 7362
Joined: Sun Dec 18, 2011 6:18 pm

Re: Diversified portfolio but still too much Apple, Microsoft, etc.

Post by Phineas J. Whoopee » Wed Jun 13, 2018 1:55 pm

If the market portfolio is not diversified, then what is, and what definition are you using for the word diversified?
PJW

MotoTrojan
Posts: 2093
Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2017 8:39 pm

Re: Diversified portfolio but still too much Apple, Microsoft, etc.

Post by MotoTrojan » Wed Jun 13, 2018 2:08 pm

Apple having a 50% crash while the rest of the market is swimming along fine would be a pretty unprecedented event and would result in a 1.4% drop. In reality these mega-corps are so highly correlated to the market that holding a couple percent of the biggest doesn't concern me at all. They do make equal-weight S&P500 funds, but the expenses/taxes will increase quite a bit. Returns on these are usually a bit higher but that is simply the tilt to smaller companies.

Perhaps a small-cap (consider value too) tilt would make you feel better and more diversified, depending on your definition. Just more complexity (I use S&P 600 Value via VIOV, VSMAX is too big for my tastes).

User avatar
vineviz
Posts: 1201
Joined: Tue May 15, 2018 1:55 pm

Re: Diversified portfolio but still too much Apple, Microsoft, etc.

Post by vineviz » Wed Jun 13, 2018 2:47 pm

MotoTrojan wrote:
Wed Jun 13, 2018 2:08 pm
Apple having a 50% crash while the rest of the market is swimming along fine would be a pretty unprecedented event and would result in a 1.4% drop.
And better yet, by holding the market you also own Dell, Samsung, Google, Microsoft, and every other public company that would benefit from Apple’s hypothetical demise.
"Far more money has been lost by investors preparing for corrections than has been lost in corrections themselves." ~~ Peter Lynch

User avatar
jhfenton
Posts: 3250
Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2015 11:17 am
Location: Ohio

Re: Diversified portfolio but still too much Apple, Microsoft, etc.

Post by jhfenton » Wed Jun 13, 2018 3:12 pm

Phineas J. Whoopee wrote:
Wed Jun 13, 2018 1:55 pm
If the market portfolio is not diversified, then what is, and what definition are you using for the word diversified?
PJW
Presumably a reasonable definition, such as the minimization of concentration in individual securities.

I consider our heavily tilted portfolio to be better diversified than U.S. Total Stock and ex-US Total International.

Whakamole
Posts: 707
Joined: Wed Jan 13, 2016 9:59 pm

Re: Diversified portfolio but still too much Apple, Microsoft, etc.

Post by Whakamole » Wed Jun 13, 2018 4:10 pm

There is an S&P 500 index fund that excludes tech and telecom, SPXT, so it excludes some of the biggest holdings (like Apple, Google, Microsoft, etc.) Notably it does not exclude Amazon, which is considered a retail company, nor other top-10 holdings like Berkshire Hathaway, Exxon, etc.

I think it's an interesting choice for tech sector workers who already have a lot invested in the tech sector (through their jobs, stock and stock options, etc.)

Oddball
Posts: 30
Joined: Thu May 03, 2018 9:35 am

Re: Diversified portfolio but still too much Apple, Microsoft, etc.

Post by Oddball » Thu Jun 14, 2018 9:32 am

jhfenton wrote:
Wed Jun 13, 2018 3:12 pm
Phineas J. Whoopee wrote:
Wed Jun 13, 2018 1:55 pm
If the market portfolio is not diversified, then what is, and what definition are you using for the word diversified?
PJW
Presumably a reasonable definition, such as the minimization of concentration in individual securities.

I consider our heavily tilted portfolio to be better diversified than U.S. Total Stock and ex-US Total International.
Yeah, for a fund to hold 3600+ stocks but have ~20% of it value locked into the top 10 stocks doesn't sound highly diversified to me. But it is what it is, and those top 10 companies are just that large of a part of the US market. I will throw that last account, which is about 20% of our "US Stock" bucket into small cap instead of VTSAX and call it a day.

duricka
Posts: 13
Joined: Sat Oct 28, 2017 9:18 am

Re: Diversified portfolio but still too much Apple, Microsoft, etc.

Post by duricka » Fri Jun 15, 2018 1:06 am

I, too, am concerned about this for some time, especially about Amazon, Tesla and Netflix being a too big part of my funds...

User avatar
oldcomputerguy
Posts: 3221
Joined: Sun Nov 22, 2015 6:50 am
Location: In the middle of five acres of woods

Re: Diversified portfolio but still too much Apple, Microsoft, etc.

Post by oldcomputerguy » Fri Jun 15, 2018 5:27 am

Oddball wrote:
Tue Jun 12, 2018 1:42 pm
So basically I am wondering if there are large cap funds which exclude say the top 10 or 20 holdings.
Why would you want to? Those larger holdings account for larger portions of the economy and of the total return of the market.
It’s taken me a lot of years, but I’ve come around to this: If you’re dumb, surround yourself with smart people. And if you’re smart, surround yourself with smart people who disagree with you.

User avatar
fortyofforty
Posts: 1082
Joined: Wed Mar 31, 2010 12:33 pm

Re: Diversified portfolio but still too much Apple, Microsoft, etc.

Post by fortyofforty » Fri Jun 15, 2018 6:20 am

You could always add a portion of your portfolio to an additional small capitalization fund, or SCV. You are, by definition, overweighting those other stocks, based on a "market neutral" approach. That doesn't say it's wrong, just that you are trying to outguess "the market" and its free-float market capitalizations.
"In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act." - George Orwell | There are many roads to doublin'. | Original Vanguard Diehard

MikeG62
Posts: 1040
Joined: Tue Nov 15, 2016 3:20 pm
Location: New Jersey

Re: Diversified portfolio but still too much Apple, Microsoft, etc.

Post by MikeG62 » Fri Jun 15, 2018 6:37 am

OP, you could consider an equal weight S&P 500 index fund (something like RSP) which would take care of the concentration concern you have. I am not saying you should do that, just that you could do it.

Alternatively, make sure you hold a fair share of mid and small cap stocks. This would help dilute a bit of concentration risk from the handful of massive stocks in the traditional S&P 500 index fund. FWIW, my target domestic equity allocation is roughly 50% LC, 25% MC and 25% SC.
Real Knowledge Comes Only From Experience

rkhusky
Posts: 5391
Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2011 8:09 pm

Re: Diversified portfolio but still too much Apple, Microsoft, etc.

Post by rkhusky » Fri Jun 15, 2018 7:18 am

If it helps, think of Apple as 5 or 6 separate companies lumped together under one ownership umbrella. You want your portfolio to be relatively indifferent to the ownership umbrella.

bgf
Posts: 559
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2017 9:35 am

Re: Diversified portfolio but still too much Apple, Microsoft, etc.

Post by bgf » Fri Jun 15, 2018 7:43 am

index investors are a special subset of individual stock investors. they meet two special criteria:

1) they own all the stocks in the index, not just some;
2) the amount of each stock owned is determined by its market cap.

if you chose not to own the top 10-20 largest stocks in an index, you would be doing two counterproductive things: 1) you would effectively be SHORT those largest 10-20 stocks, 2) you would be LESS diversified as you would hold fewer companies.
“TE OCCIDERE POSSUNT SED TE EDERE NON POSSUNT NEFAS EST"

Post Reply