When everyone invests passively...

Discuss all general (i.e. non-personal) investing questions and issues, investing news, and theory.
Post Reply
User avatar
oriol
Posts: 12
Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2018 6:08 pm
Location: Europe

When everyone invests passively...

Post by oriol » Tue Jun 12, 2018 9:27 am

Stumbled upon this blog post a few days ago and was wondering what's the Bogleheads' community answer to this particular critique of index investing?

Spoilers:
What's more, the price becomes a lot more driven by cash flows than fundamentals. If the two guys are doing active research and decide the stock is terrible, but the other 8 have incoming cash that they must invest in this stock because its part of the index and there was an inflow of say retirement investments, guess what - there's more buying than selling! So even though fundamental research says the stock should go down, the stock goes up driven by blind demand.
While everyone's more interested in how much they can sell the stock to someone else for, at the end of the chain somewhere someone must be getting revenue from the business, not the "greater fool" to whom they can sell their shares. As investors, we don't think about dividends much because we think about capital gains and the stock price is driven today by tons of factors not related to fundamentals - the fact that a brainless passive strategy is something we even consider talks about how crazy we've gotten with valuations and trading.

zmaqoptyxbglp
Posts: 86
Joined: Wed May 16, 2018 10:17 pm

Re: When everyone invests passively...

Post by zmaqoptyxbglp » Tue Jun 12, 2018 9:45 am

What they're saying is that if more and more people get into indexing, the available alpha in the market will increase. If there were such easy alpha available, people would be able to recognize it and outperform the market for a while, till the "intrinsic value" converges to the market price.

This would mean that tons of active investors would have an easy time consistently beating the market, which there's no evidence for, even now. But say we got to that point. Now more money would move from indexing to active management to get those nicer returns. This will lead to price corrections in the universe that the index captures. But now the universe is once again reasonably priced. So at the end of the day, you can do pretty well just by holding the chosen universe.

That would be my rebuttal.

User avatar
Alexa9
Posts: 1393
Joined: Tue Aug 30, 2016 9:41 am

Re: When everyone invests passively...

Post by Alexa9 » Tue Jun 12, 2018 9:49 am

Apple is 2.8% of the Total Stock Market Fund. Everyone is buying and reinvesting dividends into Total Stock Market. I can't help but think Apple's price is artificially inflated. Same with other Mega Caps. Still, they're not too big to fail.

AlohaJoe
Posts: 3566
Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2007 2:00 pm
Location: Saigon, Vietnam

Re: When everyone invests passively...

Post by AlohaJoe » Tue Jun 12, 2018 9:49 am

oriol wrote:
Tue Jun 12, 2018 9:27 am
Stumbled upon this blog post a few days ago and was wondering what's the Bogleheads' community answer to this particular critique of index investing?
This particular claim has been brought up and debunked repeatedly over the decades. Take your subject -- "when everyone invests passively" -- and type it into the Bogleheads search box. The earliest thread I saw was from 2007, so it has been discussed for 11 years just here on Bogleheads.

User avatar
David Jay
Posts: 5278
Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2015 5:54 am
Location: Michigan

Re: When everyone invests passively...

Post by David Jay » Tue Jun 12, 2018 9:53 am

zmaqoptyxbglp wrote:
Tue Jun 12, 2018 9:45 am
This would mean that tons of active investors would have an easy time consistently beating the market, which there's no evidence for, even now.
This!

I have said repeatedly (this question comes up again and again on BH) that I, for one, will move back to active stock picking if-and-when there is easily accessible alpha. Because of people like me, this situation ("when everybody invests passively") will never occur.

My test to re-evaluate my passive investment strategy is when active managers of mutual funds can outperform the indexes just 50% the time. According to the SPIVA scorecard, active fund managers outperform their respective indexes only 20% of the time. If the pros can't find easy alpha, I don't believe that I have a realistic chance.
Prediction is very difficult, especially about the future - Niels Bohr | To get the "risk premium", you really do have to take the risk - nisiprius

Call_Me_Op
Posts: 6918
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 2:57 pm
Location: Milky Way

Re: When everyone invests passively...

Post by Call_Me_Op » Tue Jun 12, 2018 10:53 am

Question is irrelevant, since this will never happen. The system is self-correcting. As more people index, exploitable inefficiencies increase, which draws investors into active trading
Best regards, -Op | | "In the middle of difficulty lies opportunity." Einstein

lawnboss
Posts: 6
Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2017 12:56 pm

Re: When everyone invests passively...

Post by lawnboss » Tue Jun 12, 2018 11:24 am

oriol wrote:
Tue Jun 12, 2018 9:27 am
What's more, the price becomes a lot more driven by cash flows than fundamentals. If the two guys are doing active research and decide the stock is terrible, but the other 8 have incoming cash that they must invest in this stock because its part of the index and there was an inflow of say retirement investments, guess what - there's more buying than selling! So even though fundamental research says the stock should go down, the stock goes up driven by blind demand.
The blind demand from 8 passive investors is causing all of the stocks in the index to go up simultaneously. The two active researchers will depress the price of this particular stock by comparison (i.e. it will go up less). So, while the company's market cap in dollars has gone up, its fraction of the total market cap in the index has gone down. I think this means that a) the stock will under-perform the market average, even if its market cap in dollars has increased; and, b) as the fraction of total market cap declines, the passive indexers will be investing less and less in the company proportionally; this is a feedback that will give the active researchers ever-greater sway over this particular stock's price.


Tamalak
Posts: 518
Joined: Fri May 06, 2016 2:29 pm

Re: When everyone invests passively...

Post by Tamalak » Wed Jun 13, 2018 12:37 pm

there's more buying than selling!
Wrong. There's never more buying than selling. There is exactly as much buying as selling.

I'll pass on reading an article with such an obvious error. Back to the drawing board with them.

User avatar
WestUniversity
Posts: 127
Joined: Sat Oct 07, 2017 7:27 am

Re: When everyone invests passively...

Post by WestUniversity » Tue Jun 19, 2018 8:48 pm

To me this is somewhat like Vegas. As long as greed drives people to think they can beat the house, those people will keep losing money and providing the capital to keep building those big hotels. That behavior benefits me because I don’t gamble but can enjoy everything else Vegas has to offer.

The same seems to apply with the market. People want to believe there is an investing “secret” or there is a superstar advisor or a “can’t miss” investment. Those people leave investors like me able to take advantage of the “tortoise” that is index investing...

Or it could be the wine I’m drinking talking... Cheers!
:beer

User avatar
k66
Posts: 471
Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2012 1:36 pm

Re: When everyone invests passively...

Post by k66 » Tue Jun 19, 2018 9:27 pm

WestUniversity wrote:
Tue Jun 19, 2018 8:48 pm
To me this is somewhat like Vegas. As long as greed drives people to think they can beat the house, those people will keep losing money and providing the capital to keep building those big hotels. That behavior benefits me because I don’t gamble but can enjoy everything else Vegas has to offer.

The same seems to apply with the market. People want to believe there is an investing “secret” or there is a superstar advisor or a “can’t miss” investment. Those people leave investors like me able to take advantage of the “tortoise” that is index investing...

Or it could be the wine I’m drinking talking... Cheers!
:beer
No, I think that you got it right. Viva Las Vegas!
LOSER of the Boglehead Contest 2015 | lang may yer lum reek

Post Reply