## Taxable Equivalent Yield (TEY)

Discuss all general (i.e. non-personal) investing questions and issues, investing news, and theory.
Topic Author
Kevin M
Posts: 10884
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2009 3:24 pm
Contact:

### Taxable Equivalent Yield (TEY)

I thought there would be a Wiki article on this, but couldn't find one, and I'm too lazy to write one myself--posting is easier. Rather than repeat this in various threads where it's relevant, I thought I'd put my thoughts on it in one post.

When buying fixed-income securities (Treasuries, in-state municipal bonds, out-of-state munis, corporate bonds, CDs, etc) or bond or money market funds in taxable accounts, you want to compare yields on an taxable-equivalent basis, since each of these may be taxed differently. What matters is the yield you have left to spend after you pay income taxes. Of course inflation is a factor too, but here I'll just discuss the tax equivalence aspect.

You can compare either after tax yield, I'll call that TFY for Tax Free Yield, or equivalent before tax yield, which is called taxable-equivalent yield, or TEY. The convention seems to be to do the latter, probably because most yields we see quoted are taxable yields.

We can derive TEY for various types of securities by starting with their TFYs, setting them equal, then solving for TEY. For the non-itemizing case, which probably will be vast majority starting in 2018:

TFY = TEY * (1 - f - s) = Yt * (1 - f) = Ym * (1 - s)

Where f and s = federal and state marginal tax rates, Yt is Treasury yield, and Ym is out of state muni yield (in state muni yield = TFY, since there are no taxes). You pay federal and state taxes on fully taxable securities (TEY), federal taxes on Treasuries, and state taxes on out of state munis. So your yield for these is reduced by the factors shown in parentheses in the above equation.

Solving this equation for TEY in terms of TFY, Yt and Ym:

In-state-muni: TEY = TFY / (1 - f - s)

Treasury: TEY = Yt * (1-f) / (1 - f - s)

Out-of-state Muni: TEY = Ym * (1 - s) / (1 - f - s)

An intuitive way to think of this is that you first reduce the yield on the Treasury or out of state muni to it's after-tax value, then divide by the factor that you would apply to a fully tax-free security, like an in-state muni.

If you itemize deductions and fully deduct state income tax on Schedule A, the equations are slightly different. The after-tax value of a fully taxable security in this case is TFY = TEY * (1 - f - s + f*s), which can also be written as TFY = TEY * [ ( 1-f) * (1-s) ]. The latter form is more convenient in solving the equations for TEY. Again, setting the TFYs equal:

TFY = TEY * [ ( 1-f) * (1-s) ] = Yt * (1 - f) = Ym * (1 - s)

If you can do simple algebra in your head, you can see by inspection that the (1 - f) and (1 - s) terms in the numerators are cancelled out by the same term in the denominator when solving for TEY in terms of Yt or Ym, and we get:

In-state-muni: TEY = TFY / [ ( 1-f) * (1-s) ]

Treasury: TEY = Yt / (1-s)

Out-of-state Muni: TEY = Ym / (1-f)

These are the forms of the TEY equations that we see most often. I assume this is because usually investors who are concerned with fixed-income with some sort of tax exemption are likely to have itemized deductions and fully deducted state income taxes on Schedule A. However, with the income tax laws in effect for 2018, this is less likely to be the case, so the slightly more complicated equations are more likely to be applicable.

Thoughts, inputs or questions?

Kevin
||.......|| Suggested format for Asking Portfolio Questions (edit original post)

UpperNwGuy
Posts: 2127
Joined: Sun Oct 08, 2017 7:16 pm

### Re: Taxable Equivalent Yield (TEY)

I have always had a hard time thinking in terms of taxable equivalent yields. I much prefer comparing after tax yields. There really isn't any more math involved.

triceratop
Moderator
Posts: 5839
Joined: Tue Aug 04, 2015 8:20 pm
Location: la la land

### Re: Taxable Equivalent Yield (TEY)

UpperNwGuy wrote:
Wed May 02, 2018 2:23 pm
I have always had a hard time thinking in terms of taxable equivalent yields. I much prefer comparing after tax yields. There really isn't any more math involved.
It's also something you can compare to inflation.

Not sure it matters to me that my before-tax yield on my CD breaks even with inflation.
"To play the stock market is to play musical chairs under the chord progression of a bid-ask spread."

Topic Author
Kevin M
Posts: 10884
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2009 3:24 pm
Contact:

### Re: Taxable Equivalent Yield (TEY)

triceratop wrote:
Wed May 02, 2018 2:27 pm
UpperNwGuy wrote:
Wed May 02, 2018 2:23 pm
I have always had a hard time thinking in terms of taxable equivalent yields. I much prefer comparing after tax yields. There really isn't any more math involved.
It's also something you can compare to inflation.

Not sure it matters to me that my before-tax yield on my CD breaks even with inflation.
If that works better for you, then do it that way. It's not "not any more math involved", it's probably less math, because it's easier for you to think about it that way--probably true for most people. Note that the equation I used to derive the TEYs is the equation for the after-tax yields! And I started with that exactly because it is easier for people to understand that.

The thing is that expressing yields as TEYs is a widespread convention--when I do a web search on tax free yield, all of the top hits are to tax-equivalent yield calculators or articles--and I just wanted to have a single reference to point people to if they want to understand it.

Kevin
||.......|| Suggested format for Asking Portfolio Questions (edit original post)

Pigeye Brewster
Posts: 366
Joined: Thu Oct 05, 2017 7:33 pm

### Re: Taxable Equivalent Yield (TEY)

Kevin M wrote:
Wed May 02, 2018 11:51 am
I thought there would be a Wiki article on this, but couldn't find one, and I'm too lazy to write one myself--posting is easier. Rather than repeat this in various threads where it's relevant, I thought I'd put my thoughts on it in one post.

When buying fixed-income securities (Treasuries, in-state municipal bonds, out-of-state munis, corporate bonds, CDs, etc) or bond or money market funds in taxable accounts, you want to compare yields on an taxable-equivalent basis, since each of these may be taxed differently. What matters is the yield you have left to spend after you pay income taxes. Of course inflation is a factor too, but here I'll just discuss the tax equivalence aspect.

You can compare either after tax yield, I'll call that TFY for Tax Free Yield, or equivalent before tax yield, which is called taxable-equivalent yield, or TEY. The convention seems to be to do the latter, probably because most yields we see quoted are taxable yields.

We can derive TEY for various types of securities by starting with their TFYs, setting them equal, then solving for TEY. For the non-itemizing case, which probably will be vast majority starting in 2018:

TFY = TEY * (1 - f - s) = Yt * (1 - f) = Ym * (1 - s)

Where f and s = federal and state marginal tax rates, Yt is Treasury yield, and Ym is out of state muni yield (in state muni yield = TFY, since there are no taxes). You pay federal and state taxes on fully taxable securities (TEY), federal taxes on Treasuries, and state taxes on out of state munis. So your yield for these is reduced by the factors shown in parentheses in the above equation.

Solving this equation for TEY in terms of TFY, Yt and Ym:

In-state-muni: TEY = TFY / (1 - f - s)

Treasury: TEY = Yt * (1-f) / (1 - f - s)

Out-of-state Muni: TEY = Ym * (1 - s) / (1 - f - s)

An intuitive way to think of this is that you first reduce the yield on the Treasury or out of state muni to it's after-tax value, then divide by the factor that you would apply to a fully tax-free security, like an in-state muni.

If you itemize deductions and fully deduct state income tax on Schedule A, the equations are slightly different. The after-tax value of a fully taxable security in this case is TFY = TEY * (1 - f - s + f*s), which can also be written as TFY = TEY * [ ( 1-f) * (1-s) ]. The latter form is more convenient in solving the equations for TEY. Again, setting the TFYs equal:

TFY = TEY * [ ( 1-f) * (1-s) ] = Yt * (1 - f) = Ym * (1 - s)

If you can do simple algebra in your head, you can see by inspection that the (1 - f) and (1 - s) terms in the numerators are cancelled out by the same term in the denominator when solving for TEY in terms of Yt or Ym, and we get:

In-state-muni: TEY = TFY / [ ( 1-f) * (1-s) ]

Treasury: TEY = Yt / (1-s)

Out-of-state Muni: TEY = Ym / (1-f)

These are the forms of the TEY equations that we see most often. I assume this is because usually investors who are concerned with fixed-income with some sort of tax exemption are likely to have itemized deductions and fully deducted state income taxes on Schedule A. However, with the income tax laws in effect for 2018, this is less likely to be the case, so the slightly more complicated equations are more likely to be applicable.

Thoughts, inputs or questions?

Kevin
This is an excellent post. Well done.

The only input I have is to add that the TEY calculation for Agency bonds will vary by the issuer. FHLB and FFCB bonds are exempt from state income tax, so one would use the Treasury formula you have shown. The other common Agencies (FNMA, FHLMC, GNMA, etc.) are fully taxable like corporates.

Topic Author
Kevin M
Posts: 10884
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2009 3:24 pm
Contact:

### Re: Taxable Equivalent Yield (TEY)

Pigeye Brewster wrote:
Wed May 02, 2018 5:08 pm
This is an excellent post. Well done.
Thanks!
The only input I have is to add that the TEY calculation for Agency bonds will vary by the issuer. FHLB and FFCB bonds are exempt from state income tax, so one would use the Treasury formula you have shown. The other common Agencies (FNMA, FHLMC, GNMA, etc.) are fully taxable like corporates.
Sure, you should apply the relevant equation depending on the taxation of the particular fixed-income security. I just used the ones that come up most often in threads I've been involved in lately.

You also can extend the equations to include things like Net Investment Income Tax (NIIT), which I started to do, but decided to leave that for subsequent discussion if anyone wanted to bring it up. It has been brought up in other threads and PMs in which TEY has come up.

Kevin
||.......|| Suggested format for Asking Portfolio Questions (edit original post)

FiveK
Posts: 7015
Joined: Sun Mar 16, 2014 2:43 pm

### Re: Taxable Equivalent Yield (TEY)

Kevin M wrote:
Wed May 02, 2018 5:32 pm
You also can extend the equations to include things like Net Investment Income Tax (NIIT)....
Would that need to be separate from "f = federal marginal tax rate"?

Your write-up as is seems well done and inclusive of all tax effects, provided one knows "f" (and "s") for one's specific circumstances.

Artsdoctor
Posts: 3929
Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2012 3:09 pm
Location: Los Angeles, CA

### Re: Taxable Equivalent Yield (TEY)

Most would use tax-equivalent yield, or TEY, as you note above. The idea would be to compare apples to apples: when you're looking at a bond yield of a municipal bond of any sort or certain federal government bonds, you'd want to compare those rates to a fully taxable bond.

Your calculations are very detailed, but the most important thing is for the investor to actually know the marginal tax rate for investments. This is often easier said than done. The married couple filing jointly might know that they're now in the 24% marginal bracket but if their AGI is above \$250,000, they'll be subject to the 3.8% NIIT. Likewise, retirees may not know marginal investment rates if they're receiving social security and/or if they're subject to IRMAA; they may gain more than realize by having tax-exempt income even if it's factored into their MAGI. Fortunately, fewer people will be subject to the AMT which in the past made calculating marginal rates next to impossible before the end of the year. And lastly, your marginal rate one year may not resemble the marginal rate the next year, so you might want to keep that in mind when buying even intermediate-term bonds--your calculations may change significantly with very little AGI change. All in all, you have to start somewhere, but I wouldn't get too fixated on a few basis points here or there.

Topic Author
Kevin M
Posts: 10884
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2009 3:24 pm
Contact:

### Re: Taxable Equivalent Yield (TEY)

FiveK wrote:
Wed May 02, 2018 5:40 pm
Kevin M wrote:
Wed May 02, 2018 5:32 pm
You also can extend the equations to include things like Net Investment Income Tax (NIIT)....
Would that need to be separate from "f = federal marginal tax rate"?

Your write-up as is seems well done and inclusive of all tax effects, provided one knows "f" (and "s") for one's specific circumstances.
I think you may be right about that.

Kevin
||.......|| Suggested format for Asking Portfolio Questions (edit original post)

Topic Author
Kevin M
Posts: 10884
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2009 3:24 pm
Contact:

### Re: Taxable Equivalent Yield (TEY)

Artsdoctor wrote:
Wed May 02, 2018 6:14 pm
Your calculations are very detailed, but the most important thing is for the investor to actually know the marginal tax rate for investments. This is often easier said than done.<snip>
Agreed. I often mention that my expected marginal federal tax rate is 27% for 2018, and people say, "there is no 27% tax bracket". I then explain that my taxable ordinary income is in the 12% bracket, but that qualified dividends (QD) stacked on top of that spans the 0% and 15% QD/LTCG tax rates, so each marginal dollar of ordinary income is taxed at 12%, and an additional dollar of QD/LTCG is taxed at 15% instead of 0%, for a marginal rate of 12% + 15% = 27%. So 27% is the appropriate federal marginal tax rate to use for TEY calculations in deciding what type of fixed income to use at various maturities.

Kevin
||.......|| Suggested format for Asking Portfolio Questions (edit original post)

MIretired
Posts: 757
Joined: Fri Sep 06, 2013 12:35 pm

### Re: Taxable Equivalent Yield (TEY)

triceratop wrote:
Wed May 02, 2018 2:27 pm
UpperNwGuy wrote:
Wed May 02, 2018 2:23 pm
I have always had a hard time thinking in terms of taxable equivalent yields. I much prefer comparing after tax yields. There really isn't any more math involved.
It's also something you can compare to inflation.

Not sure it matters to me that my before-tax yield on my CD breaks even with inflation.
I might say that that is good as a real profitability measure. But what about the fairness of the b4 tax yield being a better indicator of expected inflation, to what ever the extent at that maturity.
Edit: Of course that's a separate thing, and easily looked at without converting any yields.

Topic Author
Kevin M
Posts: 10884
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2009 3:24 pm
Contact:

### Re: Taxable Equivalent Yield (TEY)

Kevin M wrote:
Wed May 02, 2018 7:28 pm
FiveK wrote:
Wed May 02, 2018 5:40 pm
Kevin M wrote:
Wed May 02, 2018 5:32 pm
You also can extend the equations to include things like Net Investment Income Tax (NIIT)....
Would that need to be separate from "f = federal marginal tax rate"?

Your write-up as is seems well done and inclusive of all tax effects, provided one knows "f" (and "s") for one's specific circumstances.
I think you may be right about that.
EDIT: As I discuss in a subsequent reply, if you are paying NIIT, you probably also are paying AMT, which limits the benefit of the state income tax deduction. This along with the limitations on itemizing state and local taxes and other phaseouts makes it unlikely that the subsequent analysis in this reply is correct for taxpayers subject to NIIT.

But I'm not sure for the case where you itemize and fully deduct state income taxes. This is where the +f*s term comes from, and that's because itemized deductions are subtracted on 1040 line 40 before calculating tax on 1040 line 44. NIIT is calculated using Form 8960, and from scanning through it, I don't see that state income tax is deducted anywhere, unless maybe part of it in Part II, but I have no expertise or experience here. The NIIT is reported on Form 1040 line 62, and as far as I can tell, the state tax deduction has no impact on this.

So without 100% certainty, I think you have for fully taxable (TEY):

TFY = TEY * (1 - f - s + f*s - n) = TEY * [ (1-f) * (1-s) - n ]

So for Treasuries:

TFY = Yt * (1-s) = TEY * [ (1-f) * (1-s) - n ]

so,

TEY = Yt * (1-s) / [ (1-f) * (1-s) - n ]

And unless my algebra is failing me, the (1-s) terms do not cancel out as they do if there is no NIIT. Ditto for the (1-f) terms in calculating TEY for munis.

For the case of not itemizing, there is no f*s term, and therefore no simplification due to terms cancelling out (without NIIT), so you could just lump NIIT in with f if you want.

Kevin
Last edited by Kevin M on Thu May 03, 2018 9:44 am, edited 1 time in total.
||.......|| Suggested format for Asking Portfolio Questions (edit original post)

FiveK
Posts: 7015
Joined: Sun Mar 16, 2014 2:43 pm

### Re: Taxable Equivalent Yield (TEY)

Kevin M wrote:
Wed May 02, 2018 8:00 pm
NIIT is calculated using Form 8960, and from scanning through it, I don't see that state income tax is deducted anywhere, unless maybe part of it in Part II, but I have no expertise or experience here. The NIIT is reported on Form 1040 line 62, and as far as I can tell, the state tax deduction has no impact on this.
Interesting wrinkle.

A portion of state and local income taxes may be deducted from investment income to reach net investment income, and it is indeed Part II (specifically, 9b) where that happens. One way to determine "a portion" is to use the ratio of investment income to adjusted gross income: that same fraction of state and local income taxes may be subtracted, regardless of whether one itemizes.

Don't know how (if at all) the \$10K limit on itemized deductions for state and local taxes (that includes property taxes) will apply to the NIIT subtraction for 2018 and beyond.

ofckrupke
Posts: 626
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2011 2:26 pm

### Re: Taxable Equivalent Yield (TEY)

FiveK wrote:
Wed May 02, 2018 8:37 pm
Don't know how (if at all) the \$10K limit on itemized deductions for state and local taxes (that includes property taxes) will apply to the NIIT subtraction for 2018 and beyond.
I don't see how it could. The NIIT is a completely separate tax from the regular tax and AMT and which like AMT depends on some numbers from the regular return and after computation is added to the regular tax near the end of form 1040.
Additionally, the string "net investment income" appears nowhere in the sections of the TCJA pertaining to personal income taxation.

A complication does emerge from the fact that one pays no state tax on treasury interest that nonetheless counts as investment income for NIIT.
In computing the line 9b deduction I subtract state-exempt income from the investment-income-numerator when dividing by AGI; this reduces the deduction, which then increases the tax relative to ignoring the matter, and IMO helps meet the "reasonable method" standard mentioned in the instructions for form 8960.

I am another who computes after-tax yield rather than thinking in TEY. So I just use the straight 3.8% for treasuries and treasury bond funds, and 3.8%*(1-s) for other taxables, for the effective marginal rate associated with the NIIT.

Topic Author
Kevin M
Posts: 10884
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2009 3:24 pm
Contact:

### Re: Taxable Equivalent Yield (TEY)

Another thing that occurred to me is that if you're paying NIIT and state income tax, you're probably also paying AMT, which essentially offsets some or possibly all of the state income tax deduction. At even higher income levels, itemized deductions are partially phased out, further limiting the benefit from a state income tax deduction. And of course the SALT limit of \$10K on state and local taxes is likely to hit taxpayers with incomes at this level, again reducing any benefit from the state tax deduction.

When any of these kick in, you are no longer getting the full benefit of the state income tax deduction, and the equations for the itemizing (and fully deducting state taxes) case do not apply. I'd probably just use tax software to determine my marginal tax rates at that point (probably a good idea no matter what).

This is why I qualified using these equations for the itemizing case with "fully deduct state income tax".

Kevin
||.......|| Suggested format for Asking Portfolio Questions (edit original post)

ofckrupke
Posts: 626
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2011 2:26 pm

### Re: Taxable Equivalent Yield (TEY)

Kevin M wrote:
Thu May 03, 2018 9:39 am
Another thing that occurred to me is that if you're paying NIIT and state income tax, you're probably also paying AMT, which essentially offsets some or possibly all of the state income tax deduction. At even higher income levels, itemized deductions are partially phased out, further limiting the benefit from a state income tax deduction. And of course the SALT limit of \$10K on state and local taxes is likely to hit taxpayers with incomes at this level, again reducing any benefit from the state tax deduction.
On the first point, yes, but AMT and NIIT are completely separately calculated taxes, so whether or not is one has nonzero AMT does not affect the NIIT's deduction for state taxation.
And if one has nonzero AMT then the Pease limitation is inconsequential to a TEY calculation.
While Pease and PEP are abated for the duration of TCJA, the set of tax units subject to AMT under TCJA will be much smaller because its exemption phaseout is pushed back to much, much higher income levels.

As for the SALT limitation: yes, if one will cap out then at the margin there's no federal deduction for state taxation so for tax-equivalency of returns it's like being subject to AMT or taking the standard deduction or the case of an investment with state-exempt interest.
But that's for the regular tax, which as per my post above has no interaction with, and no impact on, the deduction for state taxation of investment income within the NIIT calculation.

FiveK
Posts: 7015
Joined: Sun Mar 16, 2014 2:43 pm

### Re: Taxable Equivalent Yield (TEY)

Kevin M wrote:
Thu May 03, 2018 9:39 am
I'd probably just use tax software to determine my marginal tax rates at that point (probably a good idea no matter what).
+1

Algebra is great when it works, but tax law functions aren't always well-behaved.

retiringwhen
Posts: 1157
Joined: Sat Jul 08, 2017 10:09 am
Location: New Jersey, USA

### Re: Taxable Equivalent Yield (TEY)

Kevin M. I just referenced this thread in another Muni post this morning. Has anyone considered putting this into the Wiki? This is very useful info that needs to be referenced regularly as it comes up all the time.

House Blend
Posts: 4587
Joined: Fri May 04, 2007 1:02 pm

### Re: Taxable Equivalent Yield (TEY)

UpperNwGuy wrote:
Wed May 02, 2018 2:23 pm
I have always had a hard time thinking in terms of taxable equivalent yields. I much prefer comparing after tax yields. There really isn't any more math involved.
+1. In some sense it is only reframing the issue, but I agree that after tax yield offers a better perspective.

What matters is what you get to keep after taxes, not how much you would need to artificially boost the yield so as to enable fair comparisons in a world without taxes.

Topic Author
Kevin M
Posts: 10884
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2009 3:24 pm
Contact:

### Re: Taxable Equivalent Yield (TEY)

retiringwhen wrote:
Fri May 03, 2019 6:59 am
Kevin M. I just referenced this thread in another Muni post this morning. Has anyone considered putting this into the Wiki? This is very useful info that needs to be referenced regularly as it comes up all the time.
Anyone who has the desire and energy can write or update a Wiki article. I used to do it, but it's too much work, and I don't like "negotiating" with others about the content.

So if you or anyone else wants to take it on, please go for it. As stated in my OP, I looked in the Wiki first, as I expected that there would be an article about something so fundamental.

Kevin
||.......|| Suggested format for Asking Portfolio Questions (edit original post)

Riley15
Posts: 186
Joined: Wed May 11, 2016 9:21 pm

### Re: Taxable Equivalent Yield (TEY)

Kevin M wrote:
Wed May 02, 2018 11:51 am
I thought there would be a Wiki article on this, but couldn't find one, and I'm too lazy to write one myself--posting is easier. Rather than repeat this in various threads where it's relevant, I thought I'd put my thoughts on it in one post.

When buying fixed-income securities (Treasuries, in-state municipal bonds, out-of-state munis, corporate bonds, CDs, etc) or bond or money market funds in taxable accounts, you want to compare yields on an taxable-equivalent basis, since each of these may be taxed differently. What matters is the yield you have left to spend after you pay income taxes. Of course inflation is a factor too, but here I'll just discuss the tax equivalence aspect.

You can compare either after tax yield, I'll call that TFY for Tax Free Yield, or equivalent before tax yield, which is called taxable-equivalent yield, or TEY. The convention seems to be to do the latter, probably because most yields we see quoted are taxable yields.

We can derive TEY for various types of securities by starting with their TFYs, setting them equal, then solving for TEY. For the non-itemizing case, which probably will be vast majority starting in 2018:

TFY = TEY * (1 - f - s) = Yt * (1 - f) = Ym * (1 - s)

Where f and s = federal and state marginal tax rates, Yt is Treasury yield, and Ym is out of state muni yield (in state muni yield = TFY, since there are no taxes). You pay federal and state taxes on fully taxable securities (TEY), federal taxes on Treasuries, and state taxes on out of state munis. So your yield for these is reduced by the factors shown in parentheses in the above equation.

Solving this equation for TEY in terms of TFY, Yt and Ym:

In-state-muni: TEY = TFY / (1 - f - s)

Treasury: TEY = Yt * (1-f) / (1 - f - s)

Out-of-state Muni: TEY = Ym * (1 - s) / (1 - f - s)

An intuitive way to think of this is that you first reduce the yield on the Treasury or out of state muni to it's after-tax value, then divide by the factor that you would apply to a fully tax-free security, like an in-state muni.

If you itemize deductions and fully deduct state income tax on Schedule A, the equations are slightly different. The after-tax value of a fully taxable security in this case is TFY = TEY * (1 - f - s + f*s), which can also be written as TFY = TEY * [ ( 1-f) * (1-s) ]. The latter form is more convenient in solving the equations for TEY. Again, setting the TFYs equal:

TFY = TEY * [ ( 1-f) * (1-s) ] = Yt * (1 - f) = Ym * (1 - s)

If you can do simple algebra in your head, you can see by inspection that the (1 - f) and (1 - s) terms in the numerators are cancelled out by the same term in the denominator when solving for TEY in terms of Yt or Ym, and we get:

In-state-muni: TEY = TFY / [ ( 1-f) * (1-s) ]

Treasury: TEY = Yt / (1-s)

Out-of-state Muni: TEY = Ym / (1-f)

These are the forms of the TEY equations that we see most often. I assume this is because usually investors who are concerned with fixed-income with some sort of tax exemption are likely to have itemized deductions and fully deducted state income taxes on Schedule A. However, with the income tax laws in effect for 2018, this is less likely to be the case, so the slightly more complicated equations are more likely to be applicable.

Thoughts, inputs or questions?

Kevin
Kevin,

Thanks for the great explanation. But to expand on this to other types investments except bonds, I am trying to determine the comparable TEY between say a Dividend/REIT Funds which are taxed at the Federal Dividend Rate for Qualified Dividends which is less than the income tax rate on Bonds.

So how would be go about calculating a equivalent TEY for a given qualified Dividend yield compared to a Bond or a CD that is fully taxable?

MikeG62
Posts: 1836
Joined: Tue Nov 15, 2016 3:20 pm
Location: New Jersey

### Re: Taxable Equivalent Yield (TEY)

Great post Kevin. This should be made a sticky at the top of the Investing Theory page.
Real Knowledge Comes Only From Experience

Topic Author
Kevin M
Posts: 10884
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2009 3:24 pm
Contact:

### Re: Taxable Equivalent Yield (TEY)

Riley15 wrote:
Sun Jul 07, 2019 10:17 pm
Kevin,

Thanks for the great explanation. But to expand on this to other types investments except bonds, I am trying to determine the comparable TEY between say a Dividend/REIT Funds which are taxed at the Federal Dividend Rate for Qualified Dividends which is less than the income tax rate on Bonds.

So how would be go about calculating a equivalent TEY for a given qualified Dividend yield compared to a Bond or a CD that is fully taxable?
I'm not sure that would be a meaningful comparison, since a significant component of your expected return on stock fund is the capital return.

A money market fund or individual fixed-income security held to maturity has no capital return component, so as long as you're comparing fixed income of similar risk, the comparison is meaningful. For example, I use TEY mainly to compare different money market funds (e.g., taxable, Treasury, national muni, state muni) and savings accounts, all of which have close to no risk.

A bond fund has a capital return component, but the longer you hold it, the less significance the capital return has. Still, I would think about the capital return component and the associated risk when comparing bond funds to each other or to money market funds, for example.

At any rate, if for whatever reason you want to compare the yield that is delivered solely in the form of qualified dividends to a yield that is taxed at your ordinary marginal tax rates on a taxable equivalent basis, I guess I'd derive it this way:

TFY = TEY * (1 - f - s) = Yq * (1 - fq - sq)

where Yq is the qualified dividend yield, fq = federal marginal tax rate on QD and sq = state marginal tax rate on QD.

Solving for TEY in terms of Yq:

TEY = Yq * (1 - fq - sq) / (1 - f - s)

So you would multiply Yq by the factor (1 - fq - sq) / (1 - f - s) to get this version of TEY.

As an intuitive check, fq < f, and I assume sq <= s, so the numerator would be larger than the denominator, and TEY would be larger than Yq, as expected.

The fq rate probably is 0% or 15%, unless your income is high enough to push your QD/LTCG into the 20% bracket. My state, CA, doesn't offer a privileged rate for QD/LTCG, so sq = s for me.

Kevin
||.......|| Suggested format for Asking Portfolio Questions (edit original post)

kardan
Posts: 36
Joined: Sun Apr 28, 2019 9:56 am

### Re: Taxable Equivalent Yield (TEY)

Kevin M wrote:
Wed May 02, 2018 7:38 pm
I often mention that my expected marginal federal tax rate is 27% for 2018, and people say, "there is no 27% tax bracket". I then explain that my taxable ordinary income is in the 12% bracket, but that qualified dividends (QD) stacked on top of that spans the 0% and 15% QD/LTCG tax rates, so each marginal dollar of ordinary income is taxed at 12%, and an additional dollar of QD/LTCG is taxed at 15% instead of 0%, for a marginal rate of 12% + 15% = 27%. So 27% is the appropriate federal marginal tax rate to use for TEY calculations in deciding what type of fixed income to use at various maturities.

Kevin
I believe this comment could be misconstrued by some people. While it may be true for you, it is somewhat of a special case. For it to apply you would have to have QD and/or LTCG that straddle the 0%/15% threshold so that an additional dollar of taxable yield pushed more of your QD/LTCG into the 15% bracket. For many people in the 12% bracket, this will not be the case so their marginal rate will only be 12%. This speaks well to the comments indicating that knowing your marginal rate may be the hardest part of calculating TEY.

prd1982
Posts: 109
Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2017 4:43 pm

### Re: Taxable Equivalent Yield (TEY)

If I wanted to determine the after tax effect, I would bring up last year's H&R Block tax file, add a fake 1099 for \$1,000 and subtract the additional Fed & State tax to determine the after tax amount. This handles the marginal ordinary vs. investment rates, NIIT, AMT, and state issues. I really think a lot of people don't appreciate how useful having a desk top version of their tax prep software can be.

Topic Author
Kevin M
Posts: 10884
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2009 3:24 pm
Contact:

### Re: Taxable Equivalent Yield (TEY)

kardan wrote:
Mon Jul 08, 2019 2:26 pm
Kevin M wrote:
Wed May 02, 2018 7:38 pm
I often mention that my expected marginal federal tax rate is 27% for 2018, and people say, "there is no 27% tax bracket". I then explain that my taxable ordinary income is in the 12% bracket, but that qualified dividends (QD) stacked on top of that spans the 0% and 15% QD/LTCG tax rates, so each marginal dollar of ordinary income is taxed at 12%, and an additional dollar of QD/LTCG is taxed at 15% instead of 0%, for a marginal rate of 12% + 15% = 27%. So 27% is the appropriate federal marginal tax rate to use for TEY calculations in deciding what type of fixed income to use at various maturities.

Kevin
I believe this comment could be misconstrued by some people. While it may be true for you, it is somewhat of a special case. For it to apply you would have to have QD and/or LTCG that straddle the 0%/15% threshold so that an additional dollar of taxable yield pushed more of your QD/LTCG into the 15% bracket. For many people in the 12% bracket, this will not be the case so their marginal rate will only be 12%. This speaks well to the comments indicating that knowing your marginal rate may be the hardest part of calculating TEY.
It could only be misconstrued if not read carefully, as I explained (underlined here) exactly the qualification you mention (also underlined).

I don't know how common it is, but I would expect it to be fairly common for retirees (no earned income, so relatively low, but decent, ordinary income) with significant qualified dividends (and/or LTCG of course). Of course that requires a decent amount of stock holdings in taxable accounts. That is my situation.

The 25% marginal tax rate (10% + 15%) that applied before the most recent tax changes has been mentioned by many others in Bogleheads posts over the years.

Kevin
||.......|| Suggested format for Asking Portfolio Questions (edit original post)

Topic Author
Kevin M
Posts: 10884
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2009 3:24 pm
Contact:

### Re: Taxable Equivalent Yield (TEY)

prd1982 wrote:
Mon Jul 08, 2019 2:46 pm
If I wanted to determine the after tax effect, I would bring up last year's H&R Block tax file, add a fake 1099 for \$1,000 and subtract the additional Fed & State tax to determine the after tax amount. This handles the marginal ordinary vs. investment rates, NIIT, AMT, and state issues. I really think a lot of people don't appreciate how useful having a desk top version of their tax prep software can be.

Kevin M wrote:
Thu May 03, 2018 9:39 am
Another thing that occurred to me is that if you're paying NIIT and state income tax, you're probably also paying AMT, which essentially offsets some or possibly all of the state income tax deduction. At even higher income levels, itemized deductions are partially phased out, further limiting the benefit from a state income tax deduction. And of course the SALT limit of \$10K on state and local taxes is likely to hit taxpayers with incomes at this level, again reducing any benefit from the state tax deduction.

When any of these kick in, you are no longer getting the full benefit of the state income tax deduction, and the equations for the itemizing (and fully deducting state taxes) case do not apply. I'd probably just use tax software to determine my marginal tax rates at that point (probably a good idea no matter what).

This is why I qualified using these equations for the itemizing case with "fully deduct state income tax".
Kevin
||.......|| Suggested format for Asking Portfolio Questions (edit original post)

prd1982
Posts: 109
Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2017 4:43 pm

### Re: Taxable Equivalent Yield (TEY)

Kevin M wrote:
Mon Jul 08, 2019 3:29 pm

Kevin
Sorry, missed that. My eyes gazed over while looking at all the math.

Topic Author
Kevin M
Posts: 10884
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2009 3:24 pm
Contact:

### Re: Taxable Equivalent Yield (TEY)

^No problem. It doesn't hurt to repeat good info like that.

Kevin
||.......|| Suggested format for Asking Portfolio Questions (edit original post)