How many of you use the "4% rule" during retirement?
Re: How many of you use the "4% rule" during retirement?
Yes to your question of do I use this rule. But, and let you explain my position. I was taught to be flexible with what I
do remove. I good years 4% applies, but in bad years I'm setup to not withdraw even 2%. It works. Thanks to Paul Merrimen for this advice on drawdown studies. He got his message across well to me.
do remove. I good years 4% applies, but in bad years I'm setup to not withdraw even 2%. It works. Thanks to Paul Merrimen for this advice on drawdown studies. He got his message across well to me.
Even educators need education. And some can be hard headed to the point of needing time out.
Re: How many of you use the "4% rule" during retirement?
I used the 4% "rule" as a benchmark to give me comfort that I could retire at age sixty, which I did approximately six years ago. Since then, I've tried to peg withdrawals at 3-3.5% without trying to be terribly precise. I certainly have been enormously lucky investing into the long-running bull market.
To my mind, the 4% plus inflation method was and is a way of testing historical boundaries. Bengen and the Trinity Study pretty much say that. I find it hard to imagine that anyone--anyone--actually uses it in a lockstep fashion.
To my mind, the 4% plus inflation method was and is a way of testing historical boundaries. Bengen and the Trinity Study pretty much say that. I find it hard to imagine that anyone--anyone--actually uses it in a lockstep fashion.
"Most quotations on the internet are incorrect."-Mark Twain
-
- Posts: 5343
- Joined: Mon Dec 15, 2014 11:17 am
- Location: midValley OR
Re: How many of you use the "4% rule" during retirement?
You didn't. And I don't either .David Jay wrote: ↑Mon Feb 19, 2018 8:41 amI'm not sure what that means, I don't think I wrote of my preference in this thread.
I prefer a fixed percentage (5%?) of remaining portfolio (from Merriman's research). Easy. No inflation calculations (CPI-U? CPI-W?). If there is cognitive decline I can ask my daughter to multiply account balance by .05
Because it is variable but starts 25% higher than 4% inflation adjusted, put some of the withdrawal in the Credit Union for smoothing.
I kinda divorced our assets away from any SWR.
I have no preference in the matter, other than <10% (Descretionary Accts) of our retirement portfolio can be affected by using any form of SWR and even then that SWR is excess to our needs. The other 90% is set by RE forces and by the public annuity and private annuity institutions which then offered a better payoff.
YMMB
Rev012718; 4 Incm stream buckets: SS+pension; dfr'd GLWB VA & FI anntys, by time & $$ laddered; Discretionary; Rentals. LTCi. Own, not asset. Tax TBT%. Early SS. FundRatio (FR) >1.1 67/70yo
Re: How many of you use the "4% rule" during retirement?
As long as you define real estate rental income as 'safe' and the annuity income that is not inflation adjusted as 'acceptable'.itstoomuch wrote: ↑Mon Feb 19, 2018 11:48 amYou didn't. And I don't either .David Jay wrote: ↑Mon Feb 19, 2018 8:41 amI'm not sure what that means, I don't think I wrote of my preference in this thread.
I prefer a fixed percentage (5%?) of remaining portfolio (from Merriman's research). Easy. No inflation calculations (CPI-U? CPI-W?). If there is cognitive decline I can ask my daughter to multiply account balance by .05
Because it is variable but starts 25% higher than 4% inflation adjusted, put some of the withdrawal in the Credit Union for smoothing.
I kinda divorced our assets away from any SWR.
I have no preference in the matter, other than <10% (Descretionary Accts) of our retirement portfolio can be affected by using any form of SWR and even then that SWR is excess to our needs. The other 90% is set by RE forces and by the public annuity and private annuity institutions which then offered a better payoff.
YMMB
FWIW - I never get the feeling that my rentals are 'safe' or that my annuity is inflation adjusted.
If I had maybe 10+ rentals spread around various parts of the US I would likely feel a bit better but I have lived through downturns and isssues in our area. With one or two isolated rentals in close locations it does not make me feel 'safe'.
YMMV
-
- Posts: 5343
- Joined: Mon Dec 15, 2014 11:17 am
- Location: midValley OR
Re: How many of you use the "4% rule" during retirement?
Is anything really "safe"?
The best I can determine is to be flexible, diversify, and look at everything.
YMMV
The best I can determine is to be flexible, diversify, and look at everything.
YMMV
Rev012718; 4 Incm stream buckets: SS+pension; dfr'd GLWB VA & FI anntys, by time & $$ laddered; Discretionary; Rentals. LTCi. Own, not asset. Tax TBT%. Early SS. FundRatio (FR) >1.1 67/70yo
-
- Posts: 233
- Joined: Wed Feb 22, 2017 5:05 pm
- Location: Connecticut
Re: How many of you use the "4% rule" during retirement?
+1. You really have to look at your long term plan, including both basic annual living expenses/taxes/RMD/creating your income stream, and then planning big tickets things...which for me include:Watty wrote: ↑Thu Feb 15, 2018 5:12 pm I don't use it because I know that my income needs will not be steady and will vary greatly in different phases of retirement.
I retired when I was 59 so the first phase will include paying for health insurance, not social security income yet, and being very active and doing things like a fair amount of travel.
In mid retirement I will be getting Medicare and Social Security and even if my health is pretty good I will likely slow down a lot by the time I am 75 and I will probably travel a lot less by then and eventually not much at all.
In late retirement I would expect more healthcare expenses and long term care may be needed.
I am married so it is likely that one of us will survive the other and the expenses could change then too.
1. higher cost of medical and dental care prior to medicare at 65
2. car replacement
3. periodic home capital projects like new roof, boiler, driveway paving
4. some additional spending for an occasional "premium" vacation
5. Some sort of allocation for higher medical expenses later on: assistance at home, adult day care programs, nursing home
6. other one-time events like child's wedding, helping child with graduate school
7. would like to leave some form of legacy to child
I supposed you could include an accrual in your annual budget for these, but for me it's easier to just slot them in during years that you forecast them to occur. And be prepared for surprises.
"Take calculated risks - that is quite different from being rash." |
General George S. Patton
Re: How many of you use the "4% rule" during retirement?
This.tennisplyr wrote: ↑Fri Feb 16, 2018 6:44 am Retired for 7 years and take out what I need. I keep an eye on my total assets and try to live my life in balance.
A succinct summary of the whole "save and then retire" discussion.
Re: How many of you use the "4% rule" during retirement?
"Is anything really "safe"?"itstoomuch wrote: ↑Mon Feb 19, 2018 1:02 pm Is anything really "safe"?
The best I can determine is to be flexible, diversify, and look at everything.
YMMV
This I agree with 100%.
"I kinda divorced our assets away from any SWR."
This I do not agree with and I believe could be misleading to readers.
-
- Posts: 5343
- Joined: Mon Dec 15, 2014 11:17 am
- Location: midValley OR
Re: How many of you use the "4% rule" during retirement?
^50% agreement isn't too bad
Rev012718; 4 Incm stream buckets: SS+pension; dfr'd GLWB VA & FI anntys, by time & $$ laddered; Discretionary; Rentals. LTCi. Own, not asset. Tax TBT%. Early SS. FundRatio (FR) >1.1 67/70yo
Re: How many of you use the "4% rule" during retirement?
I think that the 4% rule, as you stated it, is good for pre-retirement planning.22twain wrote: ↑Wed Feb 14, 2018 8:27 am To be clear, I'm referring to withdrawing 4% of your portfolio during the first year, then in the following years increasing the dollar amount according to the inflation rate.
When it's mentioned as a rule of thumb for starting to answer "when can we retire?" questions, the discussion often turns to elaborate methods for setting variable withdrawal rates.
The ability to get by on less than inflation-adjusted 4% during retirement will just give you another potential tool to avoid ruin.
There are other hard problems like covering potential medical and long-term care expenses.
Re: How many of you use the "4% rule" during retirement?
6 years in ,when haven't needed to.
Pensions
SS
Divs are sufficient.
Pensions
SS
Divs are sufficient.
"One does not accumulate but eliminate. It is not daily increase but daily decrease. The height of cultivation always runs to simplicity" –Bruce Lee
- Just sayin...
- Posts: 310
- Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 10:12 am
- Location: Desert & Triopics
Re: How many of you use the "4% rule" during retirement?
Retired 12/31/2017. Our initial withdrawal rate is 3.1%, with the ability to lower it to 2.6% if need be - resetting annually. As things play out, we will likely be able to “loosen the screws” considerably, but at 3.1% our budgeted post retirement spend is considerably higher than in pre-retirement and I can see the checking account growing to crazy levels. It’s hard to change a lifetime of frugality overnight.
Re: How many of you use the "4% rule" during retirement?
Why would you withdraw money that you are not spending with the consequence that your checking account goes crazy?Just sayin... wrote: ↑Tue Feb 20, 2018 11:55 am Retired 12/31/2017. Our initial withdrawal rate is 3.1%, with the ability to lower it to 2.6% if need be - resetting annually. As things play out, we will likely be able to “loosen the screws” considerably, but at 3.1% our budgeted post retirement spend is considerably higher than in pre-retirement and I can see the checking account growing to crazy levels. It’s hard to change a lifetime of frugality overnight.
Re: How many of you use the "4% rule" during retirement?
On one hand, I agree. Why withdraw when you can continue to invest?dbr wrote: ↑Wed Feb 21, 2018 8:08 amWhy would you withdraw money that you are not spending with the consequence that your checking account goes crazy?Just sayin... wrote: ↑Tue Feb 20, 2018 11:55 am Retired 12/31/2017. Our initial withdrawal rate is 3.1%, with the ability to lower it to 2.6% if need be - resetting annually. As things play out, we will likely be able to “loosen the screws” considerably, but at 3.1% our budgeted post retirement spend is considerably higher than in pre-retirement and I can see the checking account growing to crazy levels. It’s hard to change a lifetime of frugality overnight.
On the other hand, I could see as part of this a way to reduce exposure to volatility, a pseudo future-liability-match from good years, but the number of years of future expenses kept in "a checking account" (cash, really) quickly reaches a point a low utility.
- Just sayin...
- Posts: 310
- Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 10:12 am
- Location: Desert & Triopics
Re: How many of you use the "4% rule" during retirement?
For now, we are merely accumulating cash in case some of my budgetary estimates were way off (i.e. medical expenses). If our spend levels continue to underpace our withdrawals, then it may make sense to dial back our withdrawal rate. That said, in the back of my mind, I have a fear that an early-retirement sequence of returns risk event might pop up and, as ryman554 wrote, it is a way to reduce volatility. Plus, it is earning about 1.5%, so it’s not a total loss. Do I have this wrong? Is there a better way? I’m open to input here...
Re: How many of you use the "4% rule" during retirement?
I haven't used it because my income from rentals and SS covers all my expenses. In a couple of years I'll loosen the purse strings and start spending liberally, but I won't need anywhere near 4%.
Re: How many of you use the "4% rule" during retirement?
Vanguard has an interesting piece of research about 4% rule with additional ceiling and floor, which makes for a safer spending, adjusting for market conditions:
http://www.vanguard.com/pdf/s823.pdf
http://www.vanguard.com/pdf/s823.pdf
-
- Posts: 5343
- Joined: Mon Dec 15, 2014 11:17 am
- Location: midValley OR
Re: How many of you use the "4% rule" during retirement?
Such are the advantages of Multiple Streams of Income and Ladderingsilverex wrote: ↑Wed Feb 21, 2018 3:30 pm Vanguard has an interesting piece of research about 4% rule with additional ceiling and floor, which makes for a safer spending, adjusting for market conditions:
http://www.vanguard.com/pdf/s823.pdf
YMMV
Rev012718; 4 Incm stream buckets: SS+pension; dfr'd GLWB VA & FI anntys, by time & $$ laddered; Discretionary; Rentals. LTCi. Own, not asset. Tax TBT%. Early SS. FundRatio (FR) >1.1 67/70yo
- Just sayin...
- Posts: 310
- Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 10:12 am
- Location: Desert & Triopics
Re: How many of you use the "4% rule" during retirement?
They've just about summarized my approach. Their starting WR is 4%, their ceiling is 5% and their floor is 2.5%, while my starting WR is 3.1%, my ceiling is 5%, and my floor is 2.6%. They quote a 92% success rate with this approach. I've used most of McClung's LOYM methodology to construct my more conservative plan, and hope it's enough for a planned 35-year horizon.silverex wrote: ↑Wed Feb 21, 2018 3:30 pm Vanguard has an interesting piece of research about 4% rule with additional ceiling and floor, which makes for a safer spending, adjusting for market conditions:
http://www.vanguard.com/pdf/s823.pdf