
I have to say that the first half-million is quite a schlep.

You and others have raised fair and complex questions and I could write a book on the topic. As a high-level starting point I would point to a complex economy and supply and demand.wrongfunds wrote: ↑Wed Dec 20, 2017 9:32 pm Since you opened up with the following quotewhat value do you add financially which allows you to earn $2.9M per year? You have every right to not trust the industry if you think they are wasting money including on your own salaryFrankly, I do not trust the financial services industry and I think everyone needs to be well educated financially.
No seriously, how does financial industry internally justify their paychecks? I understand bigger paychecks for people who increase the total output of the world but I am having hard time how financial industry makes the total pie bigger.
To the posters who, from reading an online message appear to be looking down on NYCguy (maybe I'm misreading that), I am a bit surprised. Here is an individual who is doing very well and NONE of his posts have appeared smug or condescending to others. Instead, he has been very open about what he makes and is enjoying the benefits of his work to get there vs. feeling entitled about it. But rather than learn from him, or smile as he passes by and focus on others we feel are more appropriate models for us to follow, some of the posts (as I read them) seem to really have some venom towards him. And for that, I am sad to read that here on Bogleheads.NYCguy wrote: ↑Thu Dec 21, 2017 12:23 pm<snip>wrongfunds wrote: ↑Wed Dec 20, 2017 9:32 pm Since you opened up with the following quotewhat value do you add financially which allows you to earn $2.9M per year? You have every right to not trust the industry if you think they are wasting money including on your own salaryFrankly, I do not trust the financial services industry and I think everyone needs to be well educated financially.
No seriously, how does financial industry internally justify their paychecks? I understand bigger paychecks for people who increase the total output of the world but I am having hard time how financial industry makes the total pie bigger.
My business is very much driven by supplying and demand. We do not justify salaries: we need to pay what the market demands. I am one of several owners of my business and we have over a thousand employees. My income is my share of the profits. Several of my co-owners take multiples of what I earn. The majority of our employees earn six figure incomes and several dozen earn seven-figure incomes, including IT and accounting professionals. If we don’t pay appropriately we lose talented people to our competition. We face this literally every day.
<snip>
I hold doctors, lawyers, teachers, first responders and artists in the highest regard and for whatever reason our world does not compensate those people as they should be compensated. I bused tables on the graveyard shift and literally dug ditches during college so I have some perspective of what is hard work. Every day I count my good fortune for those jobs being in my past.
For sure. Took us 11 years to get to $250K of retirement savings. Student loans & DW staying at home with the kids slowed things down for sure, and the dot.com crash stalled our savings for three years, but we kept throwing $ at the 401(k)s. The good news: it was only about 6 additional years to double it to $500K (even with 2008). Still, it was a 17 year slog for us to reach $500K.
Agreed. It is MUCH easier to say you would be this or that if you made as much as this poster or at his net worth, but it is different then actually doing it when you have that much.BrandonBogle wrote: ↑Thu Dec 21, 2017 12:33 pm
To the posters who, from reading an online message appear to be looking down on NYCguy (maybe I'm misreading that), I am a bit surprised. Here is an individual who is doing very well and NONE of his posts have appeared smug or condescending to others. Instead, he has been very open about what he makes and is enjoying the benefits of his work to get there vs. feeling entitled about it. But rather than learn from him, or smile as he passes by and focus on others we feel are more appropriate models for us to follow, some of the posts (as I read them) seem to really have some venom towards him. And for that, I am sad to read that here on Bogleheads.
NYCguy, I thank you for continuing to post regardless.
No venom at all...BrandonBogle wrote: ↑Thu Dec 21, 2017 12:33 pm To the posters who, from reading an online message appear to be looking down on NYCguy (maybe I'm misreading that), I am a bit surprised. Here is an individual who is doing very well and NONE of his posts have appeared smug or condescending to others. Instead, he has been very open about what he makes and is enjoying the benefits of his work to get there vs. feeling entitled about it. But rather than learn from him, or smile as he passes by and focus on others we feel are more appropriate models for us to follow, some of the posts (as I read them) seem to really have some venom towards him. And for that, I am sad to read that here on Bogleheads.
I am glad I misread your remarks! No offense taken.HomerJ wrote: ↑Fri Dec 22, 2017 12:40 pm No venom at all...
I'm very sad that people read my remarks that way. I'm quite impressed with NYCguy, especially from his subsequent posts, but even my original reply offered sincere congratulations on his success.
My point was that his salary is so far beyond the average, that it's difficult for the average person to be inspired by his savings story. You can be inspired by his other attributes, and his career success.
But it's not that hard to save money when you've made over a million dollars a year for the past 12 years.
Since I will never make that kind of money, his experience doesn't apply to me. That's all I meant.
My apologies if I gave offense.
I hope someone can get this message over to Mr. Bogle. I am sure he would be quite proud his message has not only reached a senior person in the finance community, but has been received and is getting to the folks below him. I am sure this would make his Christmas/ New Years holidays!
Good post. +1NYCguy wrote: ↑Thu Dec 21, 2017 12:23 pmYou and others have raised fair and complex questions and I could write a book on the topic. As a high-level starting point I would point to a complex economy and supply and demand.wrongfunds wrote: ↑Wed Dec 20, 2017 9:32 pm Since you opened up with the following quotewhat value do you add financially which allows you to earn $2.9M per year? You have every right to not trust the industry if you think they are wasting money including on your own salaryFrankly, I do not trust the financial services industry and I think everyone needs to be well educated financially.
No seriously, how does financial industry internally justify their paychecks? I understand bigger paychecks for people who increase the total output of the world but I am having hard time how financial industry makes the total pie bigger.
Both the US economy and the world economy is so much more complex than it was 20 or 30 years ago. My view is our economy simply could not exist in its current form without the complex finance. Many of us love Vanguard and the significant market returns it provides us on efficient basis. The operation of Vanguard and the returns we enjoy I do not believe would exist without complex finance. We all may hold a romantic view of the simpler time but I do not believe return to a simpler world provide a better quality of life for the whole. This is but one small example I am using for illustrative purposes.
My business is very much driven by supplying and demand. We do not justify salaries: we need to pay what the market demands. I am one of several owners of my business and we have over a thousand employees. My income is my share of the profits. Several of my co-owners take multiples of what I earn. The majority of our employees earn six figure incomes and several dozen earn seven-figure incomes, including IT and accounting professionals. If we don’t pay appropriately we lose talented people to our competition. We face this literally every day.
Likewise our business competes with 20 or so other businesses and another 200 that like to think they compete with us to bring in sophisticated customers. The magnitude of our customers problems range in the tens of millions to tens of billions of dollars. Our fees are often a rounding error relative to the size of the problems.
I hold doctors, lawyers, teachers, first responders and artists in the highest regard and for whatever reason our world does not compensate those people as they should be compensated. I bused tables on the graveyard shift and literally dug ditches during college so I have some perspective of what is hard work. Every day I count my good fortune for those jobs being in my past.
Dilly Dilly!investingdad wrote: ↑Sun Dec 24, 2017 8:02 am I missed the conversation above when I first replied.
My view is pretty simple, my wife and I are very fortunate to be where we are financially and I have no complaints. I'm not bothered nor distressed by the handful of folks doing much better than us when we're already doing as well as we are.
Contrarians, the whole lot of them
Benjamin Franklin wrote:My Business was now continually augmenting, and my Circumstances growing daily easier, my Newspaper having become very
profitable, as being for a time almost the only one in this and the neighbouring Provinces. --- I experienc'd too the Truth of the Observation, that after getting the first hundred Pound, it is more easy to get the second: Money itself being of a prolific Nature [...].
--- Autobiography (Oxford World's Classics, p. 112, emphasis original)
~20% * 2M = 400k + savings, I assume.investingdad wrote: ↑Sat Dec 23, 2017 12:15 pm Yes, it's easier.
First million at 39, second by 43. This year, 44, we added 550k.
I don't think this rate is sustainable.
So inspired by your posts. Do you have any career advice for a young person entering college in few years.NYCguy wrote: ↑Sat Dec 23, 2017 4:41 pm A heart felt thank you to all of you who had encurraging things to say about my posts. My two motivations for participating on this forum are to learn from others, which I do often, and to try and give back to younger investors, which I hope to do here and elsewhere in life.
My observation is that high earners, young and old, are as susceptible as anyone else to making poor financial decisions. It is part of the reason why my business provides financial education to our employees and why I personally engage with people working directly with me. I frequently give away copies of John Bogle’s books.
Further, I did not start out as an exceptionally high earner by New York City standards. I believe I benefited from forming good financial habits and a solid investment foundation from which to grow. Undoubtedly there are some young investors here who will be pleasantly surprised over their careers and hopefully they can benefit from a solid foundation and good financial habits.
I remember feeling that the first $20,000 saved was a real accomplishment, and it was.
I did detect some uncharacteristic snark in some responses, but that’s ok, and I appreciate people clarify their intentions.
Merry Christmas to all celebrating.
+1 NYCguy, you are truly an inspiration.staythecourse wrote: ↑Wed Dec 20, 2017 10:42 pmThis is how you become successful. When folks stop trying to learn from those around them no matter where they are in life is when you stop improving. I give some serious kudos for someone with this level of income on a board like this where he is likely the top 1-2 posters income and net worth (at his age).NYCguy wrote: ↑Wed Dec 20, 2017 4:51 pm I try to learn from everyone. Not so humble brag, I had dinner with four billionaire friends earlier this week. My financial success pales in comparison and is totally a relevant to our friendship. I learn from each of them. Later this week I’m having dinner with two friends who are public school teachers and raising families in New York City. I learn from them too.
I can say if I had that level of income I am pretty sure I would have blown MUCH more then you have. It is much easier to be simple when you don't have that level of income and opportunity to blow it.
Good luck.
Thanks for sharing!! I am a few years younger, BUT I achieved the $1 million milestone just 2 years ago and this month I have jumped up over $1.5M so it sounds like I am right on track to be there in another 22 ish Months!!! I assume the next $0.5 Million will happen in less than 24 months.bubbadog wrote: ↑Fri Dec 15, 2017 7:44 pm I am 51 years old and it took me until age 47 to accumulate over 1 million in my investment accounts. It only took an additional 46 months to top 2 million in my accounts which I did today. I have always heard the saying about how the 2nd million is a lot easier.
I have a simple 3 fund portfolio (65/35 stocks/bonds)
I saved 100k last year, spent 90k, after tax income 190k. Living in a small house for the past 9 years helps a lot.
Same here. Not having to fear job loss is much better than spending that money on stuff.bampf wrote: ↑Mon Dec 18, 2017 7:19 am These kinds of threads are important. (At least to me). I am doing pretty well (exceedingly well compared to most segments of the population). However, I read something like this and it makes me think about my plan, and my trajectory. It helps reaffirm my goals and my actions as I approach retirement. Well done OP. For me it isn't about the score, it is about the ability to make any choice I want (within reason). Thanks for all the commentary out there folks. It really really matters.
Yup, oh boy did I ever make mistakes on that first one.JasonF wrote: ↑Wed Jan 03, 2018 4:24 pm Congratulations! Another reason why the second million and beyond gets easier is that one pays tuition along the way to that first milestone. Those who learn from mistakes and don't repeat them find themselves in the best possible position to accelerate wealth accumulation.
How to become a millionaire?HomerJ wrote: ↑Wed Dec 20, 2017 3:59 pmOh sure, you can certainly learn a lot from them. But not about how to save $2 million.snowox wrote: ↑Wed Dec 20, 2017 3:36 pmI gotta disagree. I think you can learn just as much from a person making 2.9 million a year as a person making 29k a year. And there examples in different ways. Have totally different obstacles. Yes, I would rather be the person with the 2.9 million earnings but "They got there" , thats not a starting salary.
It's like Steve Martin's bit, "How to become a millionaire"
Step #1 - "First, get a million dollars".
Since you asked, I am now at $3,100,000 in my 65/35 3 fund portfolio.
Heck this thread and your story is an inspiration for me. We should hit our first $1m sometime in the next year (we're 54/55) and are shooting to retire when we're 62/63 hoping to have $1.8, it looks doable as we're now putting +/- $90k/year into our accounts. I've already been shocked at the increasing pace going up the $100k ladder.bubbadog wrote: ↑Thu Jan 21, 2021 10:40 amSince you asked, I am now at $3,100,000 in my 65/35 3 fund portfolio.
I am 54 years old. I have continued to contribute about $90,000/year to my taxable and tax deferred accounts combined.
I had almost forgotten about this over 3 year old thread.
It looks like the next million took about three years.
I would love to get an update from NYCguy.
Best wishes to all of the Bogleheads community!
Smokin!chenzi wrote: ↑Thu Jan 21, 2021 2:14 pm 2003-$500 (worked in Asia, just finished college as a 21 year old kid)
2005 -$2000
2006 - $12000
2007 - $40000 (worked in USA)
2008 - $20000 (financial crisis - moved back to Asia)
2012 - $120000
2014 - $400000
2015 - $500000 (moved back to USA)
2016 - $1000000
2018 - $1500000
2020 (June) - $2700000
2021 (Jan) - $3800000
Thanks for the update. I found this thread very inspiring. We are working on our second, and are about 8.5% away! Hopefully, later this year, we will hit it. It will have taken approx 4 years for it to have doubled.bubbadog wrote: ↑Thu Jan 21, 2021 10:40 amSince you asked, I am now at $3,100,000 in my 65/35 3 fund portfolio.
I am 54 years old. I have continued to contribute about $90,000/year to my taxable and tax deferred accounts combined.
I had almost forgotten about this over 3 year old thread.
It looks like the next million took about three years.
I would love to get an update from NYCguy.
Best wishes to all of the Bogleheads community!
It's not normal. Investing $14.4K each year with even a 10% return takes 20 years for the $1M, 6 more years for $2M and 4 years for $3M.LiterallyIronic wrote: ↑Wed Dec 20, 2017 3:29 pmHow are you doing that on low- to mid-60s? I make $60k but can only save $1,200/month ($14,400 per year), which is 24% of my gross income. Taxes eats another 20% of gross. Then there's my $808/month mortgage that I throw an extra $200/month toward principal, so that's another 20% of gross. That leaves me with 36% of my income, or $1,800/month to live on. Which we (me, wife, baby) can, but not with a lot to spare. Increasing savings to $20k/year leave us with $1,334/month and $25k/year would have us down to $917/month. That sounds incredibly difficult. How do you do it?winterfan wrote: ↑Tue Dec 19, 2017 10:07 am Definitely! We hit the 1m mark early last year. I guess I should amend my earlier comment. It was closer to 5 years, not 6. Now we are up to almost 1.3m with this market. Crazy! We save roughly 20-25K a year, so we had our own contributions during that time. Our average salary was low to mid 60s.
Lives in NYC where the ice cream cones are $13MrNewEngland wrote: ↑Wed Dec 20, 2017 12:02 pm With salaries like that... how are you not worth more than that?
If you zoom in close enough to any curve, it is going to look linear. When discussing compounding growth of money with younger people I'll graph out growth of $$$ over time with the x-axis being age. I always start around 40 or 45 years old and talk about all of the thousands of reasons why people wait until forty to start and try to get the point across that there are always excuses that sound great no matter what age you are. At this point the graph is completely unimpressive but I have an exponential growth equation visible.