I have to share this quote
I have to share this quote
This is a quote about gambling, but it perhaps it also applies to staying the course when the PEs are high:
"I hope I break even, I can really use the money." -- averagefool, internet commenter.
"I hope I break even, I can really use the money." -- averagefool, internet commenter.
Re: I have to share this quote
Reminds me of something I overheard back in the 90s at lunch. A couple of my analysts were talking about investing. One of them said: "the good thing about stocks is that the most you can lose is all your money."
Stay hydrated; don't sweat the small stuff
- whaleknives
- Posts: 1238
- Joined: Sun Jun 24, 2012 7:19 pm
Re: I have to share this quote
Weren't they overlooking margins, shorts, and other leverage?jebmke wrote:Reminds me of something I overheard back in the 90s at lunch. A couple of my analysts were talking about investing. One of them said: "the good thing about stocks is that the most you can lose is all your money."
Last edited by whaleknives on Sun Mar 12, 2017 11:19 am, edited 1 time in total.
"I'm an indexer. I own the market. And I'm happy." (John Bogle, "BusinessWeek", 8/17/07) ☕ Maritime signal flag W - Whiskey: "I require medical assistance."
-
- Posts: 2139
- Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2017 2:09 pm
Re: I have to share this quote
Peter Lynch gives an example in one of his books of someone who got hit pretty hard in a short sale deal. Peter recommends not doing that, just buy the stock.whaleknives wrote:Weren't they overlooking margins, shorts, and other leverage?jebmke wrote:Reminds me of something I overheard back in the 90s at lunch. A couple of my analysts were talking about investing. One of them said: "the good thing about stocks is that the most you can lose is all your money."
John Bogle: "It's amazing how difficult it is for a man to understand something if he's paid a small fortune not to understand it."
Re: I have to share this quote
Overheard at a Blackjack table in Las Vegas:
As the player lost again and again he said to the dealer, " Doug, you're killing me."
Doug replied, " I think it's called suicide, sir."
As the player lost again and again he said to the dealer, " Doug, you're killing me."
Doug replied, " I think it's called suicide, sir."
Re: I have to share this quote
That was the point of the statement I think -- I believe the reference was to a vanilla long equity hold. Margins, shorts, options ... could end up negative.whaleknives wrote:Weren't they overlooking margins, shorts, and other leverage?
Stay hydrated; don't sweat the small stuff
Re: I have to share this quote
I know a lot of gamblers and they do come up with some peculiar notions. So are you taking profits off the table now before the next downturn?tadamsmar wrote:This is a quote about gambling, but it perhaps it also applies to staying the course when the PEs are high:
"I hope I break even, I can really use the money." -- averagefool, internet commenter.
Re: I have to share this quote
I was talking to some people who were going to a nearby casino. They were excited because the slot machines at this particular casino were paying back 95%. I said something like, "so they keep $5.00 of every $100.00 you put in". They didn't want to talk to me after that.
Slow and steady wins the race.
- whaleknives
- Posts: 1238
- Joined: Sun Jun 24, 2012 7:19 pm
Re: I have to share this quote
I think I should have put a after that comment.jebmke wrote:That was the point of the statement I think -- I believe the reference was to a vanilla long equity hold. Margins, shorts, options ... could end up negative.whaleknives wrote:Weren't they overlooking margins, shorts, and other leverage?
"I'm an indexer. I own the market. And I'm happy." (John Bogle, "BusinessWeek", 8/17/07) ☕ Maritime signal flag W - Whiskey: "I require medical assistance."
Re: I have to share this quote
Thanks, definitely a post-worthy quote.tadamsmar wrote:This is a quote about gambling, but it perhaps it also applies to staying the course when the PEs are high:
"I hope I break even, I can really use the money." -- averagefool, internet commenter.
Paul
When times are good, investors tend to forget about risk and focus on opportunity. When times are bad, investors tend to forget about opportunity and focus on risk.
- Pretzel lover
- Posts: 98
- Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2017 6:02 pm
Re: I have to share this quote
A joke to tell your broker (if you haven't kicked him/her to the curb yet):
Q: How can I make a million dollars in the stock market?
A: Start with two million!
Q: How can I make a million dollars in the stock market?
A: Start with two million!
- Doom&Gloom
- Posts: 5398
- Joined: Thu May 08, 2014 3:36 pm
Re: I have to share this quote
I was at a nearby casino not long after they had opened in my state and overheard a guy commenting to nobody in particular [as he pointed to a sign claiming that certain slot machines returned 97%], "I can't believe they put up big, bright signs warning people that they are keeping 3% of every dollar you cycle through them. And people can't wait to put their money in them!"Abe wrote:I was talking to some people who were going to a nearby casino. They were excited because the slot machines at this particular casino were paying back 95%. I said something like, "so they keep $5.00 of every $100.00 you put in". They didn't want to talk to me after that.
- arcticpineapplecorp.
- Posts: 15014
- Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2012 8:22 pm
Re: I have to share this quote
This is interesting along with Abe's quote about the 95% payback rate. Perhaps people just aren't very good with math or they get confused. Hearing or reading "returned 97%" could people actually be thinking they're getting a 97% rate of return (as in making 97% on their money)? Thinking about this reminds me of how many people buy variable indexed annuities and swear they're getting 8% per year, never understanding that much of that (return) is merely their own money they're getting back. Much of the real "return" goes to the insurer. Guess there's different usages for the word "return". Return of your money is very different from return on your money.Doom&Gloom wrote:I was at a nearby casino not long after they had opened in my state and overheard a guy commenting to nobody in particular [as he pointed to a sign claiming that certain slot machines returned 97%], "I can't believe they put up big, bright signs warning people that they are keeping 3% of every dollar you cycle through them. And people can't wait to put their money in them!"Abe wrote:I was talking to some people who were going to a nearby casino. They were excited because the slot machines at this particular casino were paying back 95%. I said something like, "so they keep $5.00 of every $100.00 you put in". They didn't want to talk to me after that.
It's hard to accept the truth when the lies were exactly what you wanted to hear. Investing is simple, but not easy. Buy, hold & rebalance low cost index funds & manage taxable events. Asking Portfolio Questions |
- Doom&Gloom
- Posts: 5398
- Joined: Thu May 08, 2014 3:36 pm
Re: I have to share this quote
No. I think the mistake is that many (most?) people think that xx% return means of the money you walk into the casino with or plan to gamble. So the impression is that if they intend to gamble $500, for example, they will lose $15. If they bother to do any math at all. They fail to realize that their $500 is cycled over-and-over through the machine with $15 (on average) being seized every cycle.arcticpineapplecorp. wrote:This is interesting along with Abe's quote about the 95% payback rate. Perhaps people just aren't very good with math or they get confused. Hearing or reading "returned 97%" could people actually be thinking they're getting a 97% rate of return (as in making 97% on their money)? Thinking about this reminds me of how many people buy variable indexed annuities and swear they're getting 8% per year, never understanding that much of that (return) is merely their own money they're getting back. Much of the real "return" goes to the insurer. Guess there's different usages for the word "return". Return of your money is very different from return on your money.Doom&Gloom wrote:I was at a nearby casino not long after they had opened in my state and overheard a guy commenting to nobody in particular [as he pointed to a sign claiming that certain slot machines returned 97%], "I can't believe they put up big, bright signs warning people that they are keeping 3% of every dollar you cycle through them. And people can't wait to put their money in them!"Abe wrote:I was talking to some people who were going to a nearby casino. They were excited because the slot machines at this particular casino were paying back 95%. I said something like, "so they keep $5.00 of every $100.00 you put in". They didn't want to talk to me after that.
If you want a real glimpse into the mathematical abilities of mainstream gamblers, sit down at a blackjack table and begin a discussion of 6:5 blackjack vs 3:2 blackjack. Those ratios refer to the payouts when the player receives a natural 21 (first two cards dealt). Being paid 3:2 is vastly superior, but when casinos introduced 6:5 payouts 15 years or so ago, some players thought that was to their advantage. Not that some casinos didn't try to make it seem that way. That one change in the rules increases the house edge of the game by ~1%--put another way, the house edge becomes 3X as large as with 3:2. There are countless examples of gamblers' poor grasp of basic math in casinos.
-
- Posts: 618
- Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2014 6:35 pm
- Location: Upstate NY
Re: I have to share this quote
As the poet Charles Bukowski said:
"...How are you going to tell the dreamer there's a 15% take on the dream?
He'll just laugh and say, Is that all?"
He was referring to horse racing, but you get the idea.
steve
"...How are you going to tell the dreamer there's a 15% take on the dream?
He'll just laugh and say, Is that all?"
He was referring to horse racing, but you get the idea.
steve
In broken mathematics, We estimate our prize, --Emily Dickinson
Re: I have to share this quote
My local movie theatre, comedy club,... keep 100% of every dollar I cycle through them. I am still happy to give them money.Doom&Gloom wrote:I was at a nearby casino not long after they had opened in my state and overheard a guy commenting to nobody in particular [as he pointed to a sign claiming that certain slot machines returned 97%], "I can't believe they put up big, bright signs warning people that they are keeping 3% of every dollar you cycle through them. And people can't wait to put their money in them!"Abe wrote:I was talking to some people who were going to a nearby casino. They were excited because the slot machines at this particular casino were paying back 95%. I said something like, "so they keep $5.00 of every $100.00 you put in". They didn't want to talk to me after that.
- willthrill81
- Posts: 32250
- Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2017 2:17 pm
- Location: USA
- Contact:
Re: I have to share this quote
The PEs have been 'high' for 25 years. And if the next 25 years produce the returns of the last 25, I'll be a very happy investor.tadamsmar wrote:This is a quote about gambling, but it perhaps it also applies to staying the course when the PEs are high:
"I hope I break even, I can really use the money." -- averagefool, internet commenter.
The Sensible Steward
Re: I have to share this quote
It's just the ER that the casino charges.
While the moments do summersaults into eternity |
Cling to their coattails and beg them to stay - Townes Van Zandt
- oldcomputerguy
- Moderator
- Posts: 17878
- Joined: Sun Nov 22, 2015 5:50 am
- Location: Tennessee
Re: I have to share this quote
Heck, in my book, that's a sterling return. When I go to a casino, typically the machines keep every dollar I put in!Abe wrote:I was talking to some people who were going to a nearby casino. They were excited because the slot machines at this particular casino were paying back 95%. I said something like, "so they keep $5.00 of every $100.00 you put in". They didn't want to talk to me after that.
There is only one success - to be able to spend your life in your own way. (Christopher Morley)
Re: I have to share this quote
No better quote to hammer in 'utility of wealth'tadamsmar wrote:This is a quote about gambling, but it perhaps it also applies to staying the course when the PEs are high:
"I hope I break even, I can really use the money." -- averagefool, internet commenter.
-
- Posts: 2139
- Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2017 2:09 pm
Re: I have to share this quote
Our hero, Jack Bogle, predicts that the returns will be slimmer the next 25 years. It is another reason he gives for considering low fee index investing. If your return is maybe 5 percent and the fees take one to two percent of that you lose 2/5 of your increase, 40 percent.willthrill81 wrote:The PEs have been 'high' for 25 years. And if the next 25 years produce the returns of the last 25, I'll be a very happy investor.tadamsmar wrote:This is a quote about gambling, but it perhaps it also applies to staying the course when the PEs are high:
"I hope I break even, I can really use the money." -- averagefool, internet commenter.
John Bogle: "It's amazing how difficult it is for a man to understand something if he's paid a small fortune not to understand it."
- fishandgolf
- Posts: 794
- Joined: Fri Nov 25, 2016 1:50 pm
Re: I have to share this quote
I have some relatives that always seem to WIN when they go to the casino......I always like to tell them...........
There are two types of people that leave Las Vegas...........Losers and Liars!
There are two types of people that leave Las Vegas...........Losers and Liars!
- bertilak
- Posts: 10711
- Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2011 5:23 pm
- Location: East of the Pecos, West of the Mississippi
Re: I have to share this quote
Not sure if that was sarcastic, ironic, or what but I will answer.SGM wrote:I know a lot of gamblers and they do come up with some peculiar notions. So are you taking profits off the table now before the next downturn?tadamsmar wrote:This is a quote about gambling, but it perhaps it also applies to staying the course when the PEs are high:
"I hope I break even, I can really use the money." -- averagefool, internet commenter.
That's one thing rebalancing does (sorta). So, yes, I do that occasionally, at last yearly. My yearly RMD puts me in a position where it only makes sense to move the money from the IRA to the taxable account in a way to maintain my target AA. Best performing assets are skimmed to double down on poorer performing assets.
May neither drought nor rain nor blizzard disturb the joy juice in your gizzard. -- Squire Omar Barker (aka S.O.B.), the Cowboy Poet
- Doom&Gloom
- Posts: 5398
- Joined: Thu May 08, 2014 3:36 pm
Re: I have to share this quote
Here's an interesting social psychology experiment you can do anytime you are in a casino:fishandgolf wrote:I have some relatives that always seem to WIN when they go to the casino......I always like to tell them...........
There are two types of people that leave Las Vegas...........Losers and Liars!
Ask random people (or close friends--it makes no difference) how they are doing [with their gambling].
My prediction is that the overwhelming majority will say, "I'm down a little." It is an amazing (to me) phenomenon.
-
- Posts: 3512
- Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2017 4:28 pm
- Location: Western Washington
Re: I have to share this quote
In general, I think you're giving most people too much credit with respect to the degree of their attempts to be rational about their gambling. I doubt most even think that far.Doom&Gloom wrote:No. I think the mistake is that many (most?) people think that xx% return means of the money you walk into the casino with or plan to gamble. So the impression is that if they intend to gamble $500, for example, they will lose $15. If they bother to do any math at all. They fail to realize that their $500 is cycled over-and-over through the machine with $15 (on average) being seized every cycle.
It's the other guys who are going to lose money. I'm going to win it big...ok, maybe it won't be this time, but eventually I'm going to hit the jackpot, enough to make up for all those other times I lost money. If I don't play, all those other times I lost will have been for nothing.
I've heard a lot of soldiers experience this sort of rationalization - they say the upcoming attack is going to be a bad one, and we might have 50% casualties. Boy do I feel bad for the guy next to me. Sounds like his number is up.
The difference, of course, is the soldier doesn't really have a choice, so suppressing acknowledgement of the risk is more of a coping mechanism for things largely beyond his control. Thinking about it rationally probably doesn't make things better.
Re: I have to share this quote
No sarcasm intended just curiosity. I have been a stay the course type of investor, but I occasionally felt a little short lived twinge when I see a large paper loss like in 2008 and realize I could have bought a beach house prior to the paper losses. I stayed the course as I didn't really "need the money".bertilak wrote:Not sure if that was sarcastic, ironic, or what but I will answer.SGM wrote:I know a lot of gamblers and they do come up with some peculiar notions. So are you taking profits off the table now before the next downturn?tadamsmar wrote:This is a quote about gambling, but it perhaps it also applies to staying the course when the PEs are high:
"I hope I break even, I can really use the money." -- averagefool, internet commenter.
That's one thing rebalancing does (sorta). So, yes, I do that occasionally, at last yearly. My yearly RMD puts me in a position where it only makes sense to move the money from the IRA to the taxable account in a way to maintain my target AA. Best performing assets are skimmed to double down on poorer performing assets.
The addicted gamblers I have known from childhood are incredibly poor now, were big spenders and never saved anything in their lifetimes. There is no resemblance between those with a severe affliction and BH investors from my point of view.
I do agree with you about skimming winners to maintain an AA. I am confused as why you require moving money from an IRA to taxable for AA target? Maybe I am not thinking about this because I only have Roths and taxable and have no reason to spend from a Roth until much later n life.
- bertilak
- Posts: 10711
- Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2011 5:23 pm
- Location: East of the Pecos, West of the Mississippi
Re: I have to share this quote
It's the R in RMD: REQUIRED. "They made me do it!"SGM wrote:I am confused as why you require moving money from an IRA to taxable for AA target? Maybe I am not thinking about this because I only have Roths and taxable and have no reason to spend from a Roth until much later n life.
I am required by the IRS to take a specific amount out of my IRA every year but am not required to spend it so I re-invest it and the taxable account is where I do that.
It's a little complex because I need to satisfy four constraints:
- Total amount taken from IRA as mandated by the IRS
- Withhold 10% of (a) for taxes (as opted by me) leaving the rest to be reinvested in the taxable account.
- Only purchase equities in the taxable account for reasons of tax efficiency.
- Maintain overall AA. This involves swapping money between asset classes in the IRA.
May neither drought nor rain nor blizzard disturb the joy juice in your gizzard. -- Squire Omar Barker (aka S.O.B.), the Cowboy Poet
- abuss368
- Posts: 27850
- Joined: Mon Aug 03, 2009 2:33 pm
- Location: Where the water is warm, the drinks are cold, and I don't know the names of the players!
- Contact:
Re: I have to share this quote
Nice. Stay the course and tune out the noise!
John C. Bogle: “Simplicity is the master key to financial success."
Re: I have to share this quote
Oops I didn't know you were in the RMD stage already. What you write is well thought out as usual. You have given me yet another reason I am glad I converted all tIRAs to Roth accounts.....simplification.bertilak wrote:It's the R in RMD: REQUIRED. "They made me do it!"SGM wrote:I am confused as why you require moving money from an IRA to taxable for AA target? Maybe I am not thinking about this because I only have Roths and taxable and have no reason to spend from a Roth until much later n life.
I am required by the IRS to take a specific amount out of my IRA every year but am not required to spend it so I re-invest it and the taxable account is where I do that.
It's a little complex because I need to satisfy four constraints:
It takes a bit of planning.
- Total amount taken from IRA as mandated by the IRS
- Withhold 10% of (a) for taxes (as opted by me) leaving the rest to be reinvested in the taxable account.
- Only purchase equities in the taxable account for reasons of tax efficiency.
- Maintain overall AA. This involves swapping money between asset classes in the IRA.
- willthrill81
- Posts: 32250
- Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2017 2:17 pm
- Location: USA
- Contact:
Re: I have to share this quote
That may be and it might not be. There are many on this site who tout the virtues of valuations as a means of predicting long-term returns, but the former has never explained more than 40% of the variance in the latter (meaning the majority of the variation is not explained by valuations), and even that level of explanation only occurs at about 10 years into the future. Before and after then, the amount of explained variation is even less.Vanguard Fan 1367 wrote:Our hero, Jack Bogle, predicts that the returns will be slimmer the next 25 years.willthrill81 wrote:The PEs have been 'high' for 25 years. And if the next 25 years produce the returns of the last 25, I'll be a very happy investor.tadamsmar wrote:This is a quote about gambling, but it perhaps it also applies to staying the course when the PEs are high:
"I hope I break even, I can really use the money." -- averagefool, internet commenter.
Even more so, since 1992 when valuations have been in the historically 'high' range (with only a brief exception in 2008-2009), the predictive ability of valuations has shown itself to be even worse than predicting returns prior to then. And cumulative returns over the last 25 years have been good.
The Sensible Steward
Re: I have to share this quote
Bogle tells us to only invest in US stocks. But lots of international stocks have lower PE10s:Vanguard Fan 1367 wrote: Our hero, Jack Bogle, predicts that the returns will be slimmer the next 25 years.
http://www.starcapital.de/research/stockmarketvaluation
He argues that the US firms have international holdings, but they don't have the lower PE10s, all holdings are not equal when it comes to P10.
Perhaps returns will be fatter if you don't take his advice. No?
-
- Posts: 247
- Joined: Sun Jan 22, 2017 9:34 pm
Re: I have to share this quote
That's interesting because he, at one time, recommended 20-50% international as I recall. And Vanguard recommends 20-40% now I think. Even the great John Bogle changes his thinking I guess. I have only read his classic "Bogle on Mutual Funds". That is the best book I have ever read and helped me immeasurably. It's interesting to go back and reread that book now though. That was when treasuries were yielding 7-8%.tadamsmar wrote:Bogle tells us to only invest in US stocks. But lots of international stocks have lower PE10s:Vanguard Fan 1367 wrote: Our hero, Jack Bogle, predicts that the returns will be slimmer the next 25 years.
http://www.starcapital.de/research/stockmarketvaluation
He argues that the US firms have international holdings, but they don't have the lower PE10s, all holdings are not equal when it comes to P10.
Perhaps returns will be fatter if you don't take his advice. No?
- willthrill81
- Posts: 32250
- Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2017 2:17 pm
- Location: USA
- Contact:
Re: I have to share this quote
For me, the most convincing argument against international equities is that while they have beaten U.S. equities in certain periods of time, over the long-term, they have significantly underperformed the U.S. market (about 2% over the last 100+ years). Maybe the future will be different, and maybe the period of time that you invest in them will be one of those in which they perform better, but it seems to me like a gamble where the odds are stacked against you.NibbanaBanana wrote:That's interesting because he, at one time, recommended 20-50% international as I recall. And Vanguard recommends 20-40% now I think. Even the great John Bogle changes his thinking I guess. I have only read his classic "Bogle on Mutual Funds". That is the best book I have ever read and helped me immeasurably. It's interesting to go back and reread that book now though. That was when treasuries were yielding 7-8%.tadamsmar wrote:Bogle tells us to only invest in US stocks. But lots of international stocks have lower PE10s:Vanguard Fan 1367 wrote: Our hero, Jack Bogle, predicts that the returns will be slimmer the next 25 years.
http://www.starcapital.de/research/stockmarketvaluation
He argues that the US firms have international holdings, but they don't have the lower PE10s, all holdings are not equal when it comes to P10.
Perhaps returns will be fatter if you don't take his advice. No?
The Sensible Steward