anguard reported lower expense ratios today for 68 additional mutual fund and ETF shares, saving clients more than $105 million.1 Led by notable decreases in some of the industry's largest international exchange-traded funds (ETFs), this third wave of reductions represents a cumulative $143 million in savings across 124 fund shares reported over the last three months.
From Jack Brennan's "Straight Talk on Investing", page 23 "Living below your means is the ultimate financial strategy"
I wish they would hold the line on lowering expense ratios until they can improve customer service and the online experience. Maybe those improvement are already being paid for but the message I am getting from this is that the executives there have it in their bonus structure to lower fees by x amount but are lacking on customer service incentives.
Could I change brokerage companies? Sure, but I don't want to, I'd rather push for Vanguard to improve because I love 98% of what they are about.
Expense ratios represent the actual operating expenses for the prior fiscal year (including investment advisory fees, administrative costs, and shareholder-service expenses), meaning investors have already realized these savings by the time they are reported.
raven15 wrote:Here was my take away from the announcement:
Expense ratios represent the actual operating expenses for the prior fiscal year (including investment advisory fees, administrative costs, and shareholder-service expenses), meaning investors have already realized these savings by the time they are reported.
I am a lot less excited now.
If you're invested in VG funds, you are likely "paying" an even lower expense ratio than they currently show. They decrease their expenses over time, pretty consistently. This backward-looking measurement means you're probably losing less to expenses than you think right now!