final review of 2016 sure things

Discuss all general (i.e. non-personal) investing questions and issues, investing news, and theory.
Post Reply
Topic Author
larryswedroe
Posts: 16022
Joined: Thu Feb 22, 2007 8:28 am
Location: St Louis MO

final review of 2016 sure things

Post by larryswedroe »

http://www.etf.com/sections/index-inves ... right-2016

Wed should have up my list for 2017 sure things, wrote it several weeks ago and finally fitting it in.
Hope you find it helpful

Larry
PS an interesting exercise would be to keep your own diary of what you think are sure things for the coming year and then check back!
Fundhunter
Posts: 181
Joined: Sun Mar 11, 2007 9:11 pm
Location: Atlanta

Re: final review of 2016 sure things

Post by Fundhunter »

Yes, helpful in reinforcing that these predictions are all pure bunk, although there must be a reason why so many people who fancy themselves as "experts" still give them. :(
User avatar
dwickenh
Posts: 2081
Joined: Sun Jan 04, 2015 9:45 pm
Location: Illinois

Re: final review of 2016 sure things

Post by dwickenh »

Thanks Larry,

Being a contrarian never sounded better.

Dan
The market is the most efficient mechanism anywhere in the world for transferring wealth from impatient people to patient people.” | — Warren Buffett
Topic Author
larryswedroe
Posts: 16022
Joined: Thu Feb 22, 2007 8:28 am
Location: St Louis MO

Re: final review of 2016 sure things

Post by larryswedroe »

fundhunter
IMO it's mostly because they are not really in the business of forecasting--- instead they are in the business of fame!!!
And you don't get famous making "average" forecasts. That's why Harry Dent writes books with titles as he does, and so do so many others. And there will always be people whose beliefs tend to align with some outlandish forecast and confirmation bias sets in.
Larry
livesoft
Posts: 75122
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 8:00 pm

Re: final review of 2016 sure things

Post by livesoft »

Also showing the market was less volatile, in 2016, the number of days in which the S&P 500 changed value by more than 1% fell from 72 (16% of the trading days) to 48 (10% of the trading days),
Does that mean there were 450 to 480 trading days in 2016? I'm missing out on a lot of day trading if that is so. :)
Wiki This signature message sponsored by sscritic: Learn to fish.
User avatar
Portfolio7
Posts: 960
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2016 3:53 am

Re: final review of 2016 sure things

Post by Portfolio7 »

The 'sure things' are so often wrong you could almost use them as a contrarian indicator.
"An investment in knowledge pays the best interest" - Benjamin Franklin
Topic Author
larryswedroe
Posts: 16022
Joined: Thu Feb 22, 2007 8:28 am
Location: St Louis MO

Re: final review of 2016 sure things

Post by larryswedroe »

livesoft, I'll try and check those numbers again, thanks for pointing it out
Larry
User avatar
Clever_Username
Posts: 1779
Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2012 12:24 am
Location: Southern California

Re: final review of 2016 sure things

Post by Clever_Username »

I love reading these articles. Fantastic as always.
"What was true then is true now. Have a plan. Stick to it." -- XXXX, _Layer Cake_ | | I survived my first downturn and all I got was this signature line.
Incognito
Posts: 79
Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2012 9:15 am

Re: final review of 2016 sure things

Post by Incognito »

Does that mean there were 450 to 480 trading days in 2016? I'm missing out on a lot of day trading if that is so. :)
Larry,

You don't need to check back. That statement is correct. It refers to difference of 1% days between 2015 & 2016 (72 - 48 = 24) which is 10% of 240 trading days.
Topic Author
larryswedroe
Posts: 16022
Joined: Thu Feb 22, 2007 8:28 am
Location: St Louis MO

Re: final review of 2016 sure things

Post by larryswedroe »

thanks Incognito for saving me the trouble
Larry
Post Reply