Jack Bogle - Two Fund Portfolio

Discuss all general (i.e. non-personal) investing questions and issues, investing news, and theory.
User avatar
abuss368
Posts: 13018
Joined: Mon Aug 03, 2009 2:33 pm
Location: Where the water is warm, the drinks are cold, and I don't know the names of the players!

Jack Bogle - Two Fund Portfolio

Post by abuss368 » Fri Apr 01, 2016 8:44 pm

Bogleheads,

Jack Bogle often recommends a simple investment portfolio of Total Stock and Total Bond. He has also recommended a simple Balanced Index fund. I have family that invest in the simple two fund portfolio that Jack recommends and are very satisfied with the simplicity and investment results. Warren Buffett also recommends a simple two fund portfolio.

How many Bogleheads invest in the Jack Bogle Two Fund Portfolio?

The older I get, the more I wonder!
John C. Bogle: "You simply do not need to put your money into 8 different mutual funds!" | | Disclosure: Three Fund Portfolio + U.S. & International REITs

User avatar
elgob.bogle
Posts: 720
Joined: Fri Feb 29, 2008 1:29 pm

Re: Jack Bogle - Two Fund Portfolio

Post by elgob.bogle » Fri Apr 01, 2016 8:50 pm

Please cite reference. Thanks.

elgob

User avatar
JoMoney
Posts: 6328
Joined: Tue Jul 23, 2013 5:31 am

Re: Jack Bogle - Two Fund Portfolio

Post by JoMoney » Fri Apr 01, 2016 8:57 pm

I follow Buffett's advice of keeping enough in cash (including short-term low risk bonds) that I feel comfortable and putting the rest in a low-cost S&P500 fund.
"To achieve satisfactory investment results is easier than most people realize; to achieve superior results is harder than it looks." - Benjamin Graham

User avatar
JoMoney
Posts: 6328
Joined: Tue Jul 23, 2013 5:31 am

Re: Jack Bogle - Two Fund Portfolio

Post by JoMoney » Fri Apr 01, 2016 9:06 pm

elgob.bogle wrote:Please cite reference. Thanks.

elgob
This is frequently and repeatedly the advice they've given, Bogle in his books, Buffett in BRK annual reports, invterviews, etc..
Jack Bogle in The Little Book Of Common Sense Investing, CH.18 wrote:DEEP DOWN, I REMAIN absolutely confident that the vast majority of American families will be well served by owning their equity holdings in an all-U.S. stock-market index portfolio and holding their bonds in an all-U.S.bond-market index portfolio. (Investors in high tax brackets, however, would hold a very low-cost quasi-index portfolio of high-grade intermediate-term municipal bonds.)...
Warren Buffett in 2013 BRK Letter to Shareholders wrote:...What I advise here is essentially identical to certain instructions I’ve laid out in my will. One bequest provides that cash will be delivered to a trustee for my wife’s benefit. (I have to use cash for individual bequests, because all of my Berkshire shares will be fully distributed to certain philanthropic organizations over the ten years following the closing of my estate.) My advice to the trustee could not be more simple: Put 10% of the cash in short-term government bonds and 90% in a very low-cost S&P 500 index fund. (I suggest Vanguard’s.) I believe the trust’s long-term results from this policy will be superior to those attained by most investors – whether pension funds, institutions or individuals – who employ high-fee managers.
http://www.berkshirehathaway.com/letters/2013ltr.pdf
"To achieve satisfactory investment results is easier than most people realize; to achieve superior results is harder than it looks." - Benjamin Graham

User avatar
abuss368
Posts: 13018
Joined: Mon Aug 03, 2009 2:33 pm
Location: Where the water is warm, the drinks are cold, and I don't know the names of the players!

Re: Jack Bogle - Two Fund Portfolio

Post by abuss368 » Fri Apr 01, 2016 10:03 pm

elgob.bogle wrote:Please cite reference. Thanks.

elgob
Seriously? Consider a simple search. Also look at Jack's many books.
Last edited by abuss368 on Fri Apr 01, 2016 11:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.
John C. Bogle: "You simply do not need to put your money into 8 different mutual funds!" | | Disclosure: Three Fund Portfolio + U.S. & International REITs

User avatar
stemikger
Posts: 4918
Joined: Thu Apr 08, 2010 5:02 am

Re: Jack Bogle - Two Fund Portfolio

Post by stemikger » Fri Apr 01, 2016 10:28 pm

abuss368 wrote:Bogleheads,

Jack Bogle often recommends a simple investment portfolio of Total Stock and Total Bond. He has also recommended a simple Balanced Index fund. I have family that invest in the simple two fund portfolio that Jack recommends and are very satisfied with the simplicity and investment results. Warren Buffett also recommends a simple two fund portfolio.

How many Bogleheads invest in the Jack Bogle Two Fund Portfolio?

The older I get, the more I wonder!
I've been a member of this club for quite a while now. I may have jumped around with my AA due to listening to too much noise, but I never wavered from the same two funds. Over the years, my company's 401K changed bond index funds, but they were always the same idea, they followed the same index.

I currently hold the Vanguard Institutional Index Fund and the Blackrock U.S. Debt Index Fund. My AA is 65/35. My plan in retirement is to either hold the Total Stock Index and the Total Bond Index or simply the Vanguard Balanced Index. Retirement should be care free and what could make life easier than holding one or two funds.

Also, with the blessing of John Bogle and Warren Buffett, it's really hard to second guess your decision.
Choose Simplicity ~ Stay the Course!! ~ Press on Regardless!!!

User avatar
LiveSimple
Posts: 1099
Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2013 7:55 am

Re: Jack Bogle - Two Fund Portfolio

Post by LiveSimple » Fri Apr 01, 2016 10:32 pm

JoMoney wrote:I follow Buffett's advice of keeping enough in cash (including short-term low risk bonds) that I feel comfortable and putting the rest in a low-cost S&P500 fund.
Will follow this model, in a decade with Total Stock Market Index Fund, to make things simple. :happy :happy :happy

User avatar
stemikger
Posts: 4918
Joined: Thu Apr 08, 2010 5:02 am

Re: Jack Bogle - Two Fund Portfolio

Post by stemikger » Sat Apr 02, 2016 2:25 am

LiveSimple wrote:
JoMoney wrote:I follow Buffett's advice of keeping enough in cash (including short-term low risk bonds) that I feel comfortable and putting the rest in a low-cost S&P500 fund.
Will follow this model, in a decade with Total Stock Market Index Fund, to make things simple. :happy :happy :happy
Just curious, why wait a decade?
Choose Simplicity ~ Stay the Course!! ~ Press on Regardless!!!

Quark
Posts: 1045
Joined: Sun Nov 01, 2015 5:32 pm

Re: Jack Bogle - Two Fund Portfolio

Post by Quark » Sat Apr 02, 2016 5:17 am

JoMoney wrote:
elgob.bogle wrote:Please cite reference. Thanks.

elgob
This is frequently and repeatedly the advice they've given, Bogle in his books, Buffett in BRK annual reports, invterviews, etc..
Jack Bogle in The Little Book Of Common Sense Investing, CH.18 wrote:DEEP DOWN, I REMAIN absolutely confident that the vast majority of American families will be well served by owning their equity holdings in an all-U.S. stock-market index portfolio and holding their bonds in an all-U.S.bond-market index portfolio. (Investors in high tax brackets, however, would hold a very low-cost quasi-index portfolio of high-grade intermediate-term municipal bonds.)...
Warren Buffett in 2013 BRK Letter to Shareholders wrote:...What I advise here is essentially identical to certain instructions I’ve laid out in my will. One bequest provides that cash will be delivered to a trustee for my wife’s benefit. (I have to use cash for individual bequests, because all of my Berkshire shares will be fully distributed to certain philanthropic organizations over the ten years following the closing of my estate.) My advice to the trustee could not be more simple: Put 10% of the cash in short-term government bonds and 90% in a very low-cost S&P 500 index fund. (I suggest Vanguard’s.) I believe the trust’s long-term results from this policy will be superior to those attained by most investors – whether pension funds, institutions or individuals – who employ high-fee managers.
http://www.berkshirehathaway.com/letters/2013ltr.pdf
Buffett will leave his wife a bequest of well over a billion dollars. It's far from clear that his advice applies to someone with a much smaller portfolio. He does recommend index funds; the issue is 90% in stocks.

Bogle has recently (i.e., after the date of his book) been saying that Total Bond Market is too heavily invested in government bonds. Bogle doesn't like government bonds because their yield is so low. Presumably Buffett does not care about this for his wife, given the size of the bequest.

User avatar
JoMoney
Posts: 6328
Joined: Tue Jul 23, 2013 5:31 am

Re: Jack Bogle - Two Fund Portfolio

Post by JoMoney » Sat Apr 02, 2016 5:38 am

Quark wrote:...
Buffett will leave his wife a bequest of well over a billion dollars. It's far from clear that his advice applies to someone with a much smaller portfolio. He does recommend index funds; the issue is 90% in stocks. ...
Buffett has not publicly disclosed how much he'll be leaving his wife. The vast majority of his wealth is promised to charitable organizations. But that's besides the point, his advice has been the same to others that ask regardless of the dollar figure.
"Have a cash reserve, whatever makes you comfortable" and the rest in a low cost index fund averaged in over time.
Warren giving that advice to Lebron James:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0QvXd7S2sn4
"it's the same advice I give 99% of people ... buying an index fund and doing it over time ... nobody's ever followed that and gotten other than a decent result - nobody"
"To achieve satisfactory investment results is easier than most people realize; to achieve superior results is harder than it looks." - Benjamin Graham

gvsucavie03
Posts: 1351
Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2013 8:30 am

Re: Jack Bogle - Two Fund Portfolio

Post by gvsucavie03 » Sat Apr 02, 2016 5:57 am

I think there is a lot of wisdom in this model, but I also think it is prudent to diversify with non-US stock. The global economy is very different now than when Bogle and Buffet started investing. There has to be at least a small amount of bias in their opinion of International markets.

Quark
Posts: 1045
Joined: Sun Nov 01, 2015 5:32 pm

Re: Jack Bogle - Two Fund Portfolio

Post by Quark » Sat Apr 02, 2016 6:26 am

JoMoney wrote:
Quark wrote:...
Buffett will leave his wife a bequest of well over a billion dollars. It's far from clear that his advice applies to someone with a much smaller portfolio. He does recommend index funds; the issue is 90% in stocks. ...
Buffett has not publicly disclosed how much he'll be leaving his wife. The vast majority of his wealth is promised to charitable organizations. But that's besides the point, his advice has been the same to others that ask regardless of the dollar figure.
"Have a cash reserve, whatever makes you comfortable" and the rest in a low cost index fund averaged in over time.
Warren giving that advice to Lebron James:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0QvXd7S2sn4
"it's the same advice I give 99% of people ... buying an index fund and doing it over time ... nobody's ever followed that and gotten other than a decent result - nobody"
I have a hard time seeing how most investors, for example, retirees with a 4% withdrawal rate, can comfortably weather a major downturn with only 10% in cash reserves.

Buffett, as all right thinking people, recommends broad low cost index funds, but 99% of people shouldn't be 90% equities. As a matter of fact, 99% of people really can't be 90% equities given the overall composition of the market.

User avatar
JoMoney
Posts: 6328
Joined: Tue Jul 23, 2013 5:31 am

Re: Jack Bogle - Two Fund Portfolio

Post by JoMoney » Sat Apr 02, 2016 7:16 am

Quark wrote:... I have a hard time seeing how most investors, for example, retirees with a 4% withdrawal rate, can comfortably weather a major downturn with only 10% in cash reserves.

Buffett, as all right thinking people, recommends broad low cost index funds, but 99% of people shouldn't be 90% equities. As a matter of fact, 99% of people really can't be 90% equities given the overall composition of the market.
You seem to be stuck on the 90% equity figure. Despite the allocation he set for his wife, and what he thinks people should do, he's also said multiple times that people should hold the amount that makes them "comfortable" or allows them to "sleep well at night".
Obviously, the amount that would make you "comfortable" is different from Buffett's. Perhaps you'd like to throw out a number you think is a good allocation, and people can chime in as to why they think your allocation is inappropriate for 99% of people. ... that would be silly, and pointless.. Your allocation and risk tolerance is an individual thing.
Bogle has frequently used the 60-65% equity number, or age in bonds as examples, there tons of ridicule about those numbers as well.. You'll have to figure out what you're willing to accept and what's right for you.
John Bogle wrote:While I cannot give any investor a neat formula for risk control, I am comforted to share that inadequacy with the likes of Paul Samuelson, who tells us, “there is no way any professor of economics or any minister of the church can tell you what your risk tolerance must be.
No, nor can any Wall Street seer, nor any money manager, nor any indexing advocate, nor even any grizzled veteran of 50 years in this wonderful business.
http://johncbogle.com/speeches/JCB_NE_Pension_4-00.pdf
"To achieve satisfactory investment results is easier than most people realize; to achieve superior results is harder than it looks." - Benjamin Graham

Clive
Posts: 1951
Joined: Sat Jun 13, 2009 5:49 am

Re: Jack Bogle - Two Fund Portfolio

Post by Clive » Sat Apr 02, 2016 7:52 am

Quark wrote:I have a hard time seeing how most investors, for example, retirees with a 4% withdrawal rate, can comfortably weather a major downturn with only 10% in cash reserves.

Buffett, as all right thinking people, recommends broad low cost index funds, but 99% of people shouldn't be 90% equities. As a matter of fact, 99% of people really can't be 90% equities given the overall composition of the market.
Stocks throwing off a 4% dividend might see prices/dividends halve in value, leaving a 2% shortfall. Which 10% and drawing 2%/year provides 5 years of cover. Which is around the length of time of the down-trend before the bottom is reached and starts a uptrend. i.e. helps avoid having to sell stock at below average prices.

Bonds are loans. With treasury bonds you are lending to someone who can influence both the interest rates and the tax rates. Too much in bonds is also a risk. If instead of a bond bullet you utilised a stock/gold barbell as a bond proxy, then a 80/20 stock/bond might be mapped to 90/10 stock/gold. https://www.portfoliovisualizer.com/bac ... entage=0.0

Longer dated bonds tend to have a shorter term inverse correlation to stocks (days/weeks), gold tends to have a multi-year inverse correlation to stocks - if stocks are trending down over several years in a row then gold can be trending higher over those same years.

Quark
Posts: 1045
Joined: Sun Nov 01, 2015 5:32 pm

Re: Jack Bogle - Two Fund Portfolio

Post by Quark » Sat Apr 02, 2016 8:39 am

JoMoney wrote:You seem to be stuck on the 90% equity figure.
You quoted Buffett's letter that included the 90% equity figure. Many people believe 90% is generally applicable. I don't. If you don't, then we don't have any disagreement.

I certainly agree with a broadly diversified low cost index fund for equities and enough bonds to be comfortable.

User avatar
knpstr
Posts: 2168
Joined: Thu Nov 20, 2014 8:57 pm
Location: Michigan

Re: Jack Bogle - Two Fund Portfolio

Post by knpstr » Sat Apr 02, 2016 8:43 am

I am in the 1 fund portfolio at the moment.. But will transition to 2 fund in about 20 years when I'm 50
Very little is needed to make a happy life; it is all within yourself, in your way of thinking. -Marcus Aurelius

Quark
Posts: 1045
Joined: Sun Nov 01, 2015 5:32 pm

Re: Jack Bogle - Two Fund Portfolio

Post by Quark » Sat Apr 02, 2016 8:48 am

Clive wrote:
Quark wrote:I have a hard time seeing how most investors, for example, retirees with a 4% withdrawal rate, can comfortably weather a major downturn with only 10% in cash reserves.

Buffett, as all right thinking people, recommends broad low cost index funds, but 99% of people shouldn't be 90% equities. As a matter of fact, 99% of people really can't be 90% equities given the overall composition of the market.
Stocks throwing off a 4% dividend might see prices/dividends halve in value, leaving a 2% shortfall. Which 10% and drawing 2%/year provides 5 years of cover. Which is around the length of time of the down-trend before the bottom is reached and starts a uptrend. i.e. helps avoid having to sell stock at below average prices.
Stocks are currently yielding about 2%. If stocks were to halve in value, they'd yield 4%, all else being equal. All else could well not be equal - the circumstances that resulted in a 50% drop could easily result in a decrease in dividends.

Standard advice is to focus on total return, not yield. Standard advice is also to rebalance. Rebalancing to 90/10 is not easy if stocks halve in value.

After five years of selling bonds in order to avoid selling stocks, you'd have no bonds left. 100% equities is rather aggressive. If a downturn continued, you'd have to sell stocks at depressed prices.[/quote]
Clive wrote:...Too much in bonds is also a risk....
Too much of anything is also a risk. Bonds tend to be much less risky than stocks, especially if you use the conventional definition of variance (or std dev) as risk.[/quote]

User avatar
oldcomputerguy
Posts: 3565
Joined: Sun Nov 22, 2015 6:50 am
Location: In the middle of five acres of woods

Re: Jack Bogle - Two Fund Portfolio

Post by oldcomputerguy » Sat Apr 02, 2016 8:49 am

Quark wrote: Bogle has recently (i.e., after the date of his book) been saying that Total Bond Market is too heavily invested in government bonds.
I find it interesting looking at the disparity of alleged "total" bond funds. In particular, Vanguard Total Bond Fund (VBTLX) consists of 43.5% Treasury/Agency bonds and 20.5% Mortgage-backed, for a total of approximately 64% government issue (almost half again that of the Barkley's Aggregate Index). On the other hand, Fidelity Total Bond Fund (FTBFX) has a huge concentration in corporate bonds (approximately 50%), twice the percentage contained in the Barkley's Aggregate index, and 20% government issues, half the percentage of the Index; and Fidelity U.S. Bond Index (FSITX), which is not titled as a "total" bond fund, tracks the Barkley's Aggregate Index very closely.

I guess it goes to show that you really have to pay attention to what you're actually buying.
Last edited by oldcomputerguy on Sat Apr 02, 2016 8:54 am, edited 1 time in total.
It’s taken me a lot of years, but I’ve come around to this: If you’re dumb, surround yourself with smart people. And if you’re smart, surround yourself with smart people who disagree with you.

User avatar
LiveSimple
Posts: 1099
Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2013 7:55 am

Re: Jack Bogle - Two Fund Portfolio

Post by LiveSimple » Sat Apr 02, 2016 8:49 am

stemikger wrote:
LiveSimple wrote:
JoMoney wrote:I follow Buffett's advice of keeping enough in cash (including short-term low risk bonds) that I feel comfortable and putting the rest in a low-cost S&P500 fund.
Will follow this model, in a decade with Total Stock Market Index Fund, to make things simple. :happy :happy :happy
Just curious, why wait a decade?
As of now, no international. But have some % in sectors.

At a high level, our portfolio is follows:

Cash / Bond : 25%
Total Stock Market Index : 25%
Extended Market Index : 25%
Sectors : 25%

Somehow happy / mindset, that I am re balancing to the above allocation.

The re balancing itch, will fade away over time and also, do not want to think, by going to Total Stock Market Index, missing something, without re balancing yearly !!

More of a mental attitude than anything !!!

But telling my son / daughter to invest in Total Stock Market Index Fund, until they have some 5 figure to think about asset allocation.
( Don't know, what they hear or will listen, but as a parent want to show them, the right thing. For sure they will get it in 10 -20 years)

Disclosure : My son will be 18, this week, the gift is a "Vanguard account in his name", with Total Stock Market Index Fund, and a weekly periodic investment of a small amount ($10 - $25), to show, saving / investing small amount, adds up over time.

selftalk
Posts: 1096
Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2012 10:08 am

Re: Jack Bogle - Two Fund Portfolio

Post by selftalk » Sat Apr 02, 2016 9:26 am

My Jack Bogle portfolio consists of VTI / VTSAX and for the bond portion it`s my government pension and social security benefits and a very small money market fund at a local bank. That`s it and I feel no stress or doubts to change that even if the international index funds rise and out pace the U.S. markets.

Dandy
Posts: 5483
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 7:42 pm

Re: Jack Bogle - Two Fund Portfolio

Post by Dandy » Sun Apr 03, 2016 5:42 am

Not quite there. 1/3 of my TIRA is in Balanced Index and almost 1/2 of my Taxable is in Total Stock Market. But, I will likely always have enough assets in "safe" assets (a la Dr Bernstein) to fund retirement expenses until at least age 90.

ByThePond
Posts: 98
Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2015 11:21 am

Re: Jack Bogle - Two Fund Portfolio

Post by ByThePond » Sun Apr 03, 2016 9:30 am

2 funds for me, mostly. Other than 8% cash, I'm in a TIAA 403b with a total US stock index, the rest fully in these two funds, 75/25, overall non-cash AA.
After retirement, I'll probably use the 403b to fund a SPIA, which should complement SS in covering my living expenses.

digit8
Posts: 615
Joined: Mon Jul 14, 2008 5:26 pm

Re: Jack Bogle - Two Fund Portfolio

Post by digit8 » Sun Apr 03, 2016 9:36 am

It isn't remotely practicable for us due to our different workplace retirement plans, but in retirement I'd love to keep our investments to TSM and TBM. Backed with reasonable amount of savings, maybe a CD ladder, I can't imagine I'd need anything else. My kids, I'd recommend a healthy dose of international in both bonds and equities, but within our lifetimes I expect the two funds to give "good enough" returns.
"You can't latte yourself to bankruptcy. The bladder won't allow it." | -Katherine Porter

pascalwager
Posts: 1280
Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2011 8:36 pm

Re: Jack Bogle - Two Fund Portfolio

Post by pascalwager » Sun Apr 03, 2016 10:38 am

JoMoney wrote:
Quark wrote:... I have a hard time seeing how most investors, for example, retirees with a 4% withdrawal rate, can comfortably weather a major downturn with only 10% in cash reserves.

Buffett, as all right thinking people, recommends broad low cost index funds, but 99% of people shouldn't be 90% equities. As a matter of fact, 99% of people really can't be 90% equities given the overall composition of the market.
You seem to be stuck on the 90% equity figure. Despite the allocation he set for his wife, and what he thinks people should do, he's also said multiple times that people should hold the amount that makes them "comfortable" or allows them to "sleep well at night".
Obviously, the amount that would make you "comfortable" is different from Buffett's. Perhaps you'd like to throw out a number you think is a good allocation, and people can chime in as to why they think your allocation is inappropriate for 99% of people. ... that would be silly, and pointless.. Your allocation and risk tolerance is an individual thing.
Bogle has frequently used the 60-65% equity number, or age in bonds as examples, there tons of ridicule about those numbers as well.. You'll have to figure out what you're willing to accept and what's right for you.
John Bogle wrote:While I cannot give any investor a neat formula for risk control, I am comforted to share that inadequacy with the likes of Paul Samuelson, who tells us, “there is no way any professor of economics or any minister of the church can tell you what your risk tolerance must be.
No, nor can any Wall Street seer, nor any money manager, nor any indexing advocate, nor even any grizzled veteran of 50 years in this wonderful business.
http://johncbogle.com/speeches/JCB_NE_Pension_4-00.pdf
Warren Buffet does seem to really stand by the 10% short-term bonds (cash) figure. He followed up by saying, explicitly, that holding 20, 30, or 40% bonds is "silly".

Alchemist
Posts: 257
Joined: Sat Aug 30, 2014 6:35 am
Location: Florida

Re: Jack Bogle - Two Fund Portfolio

Post by Alchemist » Sun Apr 03, 2016 11:57 am

JoMoney wrote:I follow Buffett's advice of keeping enough in cash (including short-term low risk bonds) that I feel comfortable and putting the rest in a low-cost S&P500 fund.
Same here with one caveat. My Roth is in FUSVX (Spartan 500 index fund) but my taxable is in VTSAX (Total U.S. Stock Market).

No slice and dice, no tilts, no re-balancing. Simple, lowest cost possible, and nearly immune to behavior errors....no fiddling possible. No worrying if this or that 'factor' will out perform or what my asset mix should be. Buy up all the Roth space. Once full, put everything else in taxable. One fund in each account.

The Majesty of Simplicity.

Dandy
Posts: 5483
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 7:42 pm

Re: Jack Bogle - Two Fund Portfolio

Post by Dandy » Sun Apr 03, 2016 12:02 pm

Warren Buffet does seem to really stand by the 10% short-term bonds (cash) figure. He followed up by saying, explicitly, that holding 20, 30, or 40% bonds is "silly".
I believe what Buffet is leaving to his wife is 90% S&P 500 and 10% short term Treasuries? In any event her 10% short term bonds will probably amount to 100's of millions - so no risk to her with that nest egg. I know he is a believer in the US stock market but don't know that he sees only 10% in bonds for normal investors. If he does -- ignore it unless you are very young and very risk tolerant.

User avatar
patrick013
Posts: 2433
Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2015 7:49 pm

Re: Jack Bogle - Two Fund Portfolio

Post by patrick013 » Sun Apr 03, 2016 12:16 pm

Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index Fund Admiral Shares (VBILX)

Vanguard 500 Index Fund Admiral Shares (VFIAX)

Jack Bogle in The Little Book Of Common Sense Investing is quite
positive on the above two funds and I would be happy investing
in them at any time.

Average annual returns % for the past 10 years :

Interm Bond = 6.05
S&P 500 = 7.00

Total Bond = 4.86
Total Stock = 7.04
age in bonds, buy-and-hold, 10 year business cycle

pascalwager
Posts: 1280
Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2011 8:36 pm

Re: Jack Bogle - Two Fund Portfolio

Post by pascalwager » Sun Apr 03, 2016 2:20 pm

Dandy wrote:
Warren Buffet does seem to really stand by the 10% short-term bonds (cash) figure. He followed up by saying, explicitly, that holding 20, 30, or 40% bonds is "silly".
I believe what Buffet is leaving to his wife is 90% S&P 500 and 10% short term Treasuries? In any event her 10% short term bonds will probably amount to 100's of millions - so no risk to her with that nest egg. I know he is a believer in the US stock market but don't know that he sees only 10% in bonds for normal investors. If he does -- ignore it unless you are very young and very risk tolerant.
I don't believe that Buffet would leave his wife hundreds of millions of dollars. I would guess no more than $10 million. She's already elderly, or nearly-so, they live a modest lifestyle, and live in a farming/ranching oriented state.

User avatar
JoMoney
Posts: 6328
Joined: Tue Jul 23, 2013 5:31 am

Re: Jack Bogle - Two Fund Portfolio

Post by JoMoney » Sun Apr 03, 2016 3:03 pm

pascalwager wrote:...
Warren Buffet does seem to really stand by the 10% short-term bonds (cash) figure. He followed up by saying, explicitly, that holding 20, 30, or 40% bonds is "silly".
I think this might be what you're refferring to. Where he said he thinks it's silly to have some ratio in bonds
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1N3g47P-iRc
But he also stated that was his look on it at that point in time, not necessarily for all time.
He said that he doesn't think anyone should be 40% in bonds, but he also said he would suggest people have enough cash on hand so they feel comfortable.
If 40% is where someone is comfortable, then I would imagine that's what it is, the fact that Warren Buffett wouldn't be comfortable with that allocation is besides the point.
He also said they need to have the proper attitude where if stocks go down 20% in the next month they're not going to be bothered. If it would bother you, I would think you need a more conservative allocation, but that doesn't mean it's not right for someone else.
"To achieve satisfactory investment results is easier than most people realize; to achieve superior results is harder than it looks." - Benjamin Graham

lostdog
Posts: 1297
Joined: Thu Feb 04, 2016 2:15 pm

Re: Jack Bogle - Two Fund Portfolio

Post by lostdog » Thu May 26, 2016 10:27 am

My Jack Bogle portfolio is Vanguard Total Stock Market Admiral and Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index Fund. Very simple. Re-balance once a year with a 5% band in my retirement accounts. I am not interested in International investing as it most likely won't make a difference anyway ("When experts disagree, it is often because it does not make a foreseeable difference." -- Taylor Larimore, author of The Bogleheads' Guide to Investing).

In my taxable I have the Vanguard Balanced Index Fund Admiral. I have a different goal for my taxable account and it is not part of my retirement AA. I call my taxable account the semi-retirement goal. I am in a low tax bracket, the fund doesn't create capital gains distributions, it's always at a 60/40 AA with no capital gains for rebalancing and I don't care about the long term capital gains when selling small portions of the fund.
Last edited by lostdog on Thu May 26, 2016 10:53 am, edited 3 times in total.

lostdog
Posts: 1297
Joined: Thu Feb 04, 2016 2:15 pm

Re: Jack Bogle - Two Fund Portfolio

Post by lostdog » Thu May 26, 2016 10:29 am

patrick013 wrote:Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index Fund Admiral Shares (VBILX)

Vanguard 500 Index Fund Admiral Shares (VFIAX)

Jack Bogle in The Little Book Of Common Sense Investing is quite
positive on the above two funds and I would be happy investing
in them at any time.

Average annual returns % for the past 10 years :

Interm Bond = 6.05
S&P 500 = 7.00

Total Bond = 4.86
Total Stock = 7.04
+1

Clive
Posts: 1951
Joined: Sat Jun 13, 2009 5:49 am

Re: Jack Bogle - Two Fund Portfolio

Post by Clive » Thu May 26, 2016 12:08 pm

Quark wrote:Standard advice is to focus on total return, not yield. Standard advice is also to rebalance. Rebalancing to 90/10 is not easy if stocks halve in value.

After five years of selling bonds in order to avoid selling stocks, you'd have no bonds left. 100% equities is rather aggressive. If a downturn continued, you'd have to sell stocks at depressed prices.
Buffett suggest enough in cash/bonds to feel comfortable and the rest in stocks.

If your comfort level is 20 years of living expenses and that's 40% of the total (2% withdrawal rate) then you start with 60/40 stock/bonds and spend 2%/year to drawdown bonds to zero over 20 years leaving 100% stock. Average 80/20 stock/bond. No rebalancing involved. Prospects for growth from stocks over 20 years are reasonable especially when reinvesting dividends. If 1% x 20 years is enough then start with 80/20, end at 100/0, average 90/10 which is the camp Buffett is in.

User avatar
abuss368
Posts: 13018
Joined: Mon Aug 03, 2009 2:33 pm
Location: Where the water is warm, the drinks are cold, and I don't know the names of the players!

Re: Jack Bogle - Two Fund Portfolio

Post by abuss368 » Thu May 26, 2016 1:09 pm

lostdog wrote:My Jack Bogle portfolio is Vanguard Total Stock Market Admiral and Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index Fund. Very simple. Re-balance once a year with a 5% band in my retirement accounts. I am not interested in International investing as it most likely won't make a difference anyway ("When experts disagree, it is often because it does not make a foreseeable difference." -- Taylor Larimore, author of The Bogleheads' Guide to Investing).

In my taxable I have the Vanguard Balanced Index Fund Admiral. I have a different goal for my taxable account and it is not part of my retirement AA. I call my taxable account the semi-retirement goal. I am in a low tax bracket, the fund doesn't create capital gains distributions, it's always at a 60/40 AA with no capital gains for rebalancing and I don't care about the long term capital gains when selling small portions of the fund.
Hi lostdog,

You have a very simple and effective investment portfolio. Now stay the course!

Best.
John C. Bogle: "You simply do not need to put your money into 8 different mutual funds!" | | Disclosure: Three Fund Portfolio + U.S. & International REITs

User avatar
munemaker
Posts: 3604
Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2014 6:14 pm

Re: Jack Bogle - Two Fund Portfolio

Post by munemaker » Thu May 26, 2016 2:38 pm

abuss368 wrote:Bogleheads,

Jack Bogle often recommends a simple investment portfolio of Total Stock and Total Bond. He has also recommended a simple Balanced Index fund. I have family that invest in the simple two fund portfolio that Jack recommends and are very satisfied with the simplicity and investment results. Warren Buffett also recommends a simple two fund portfolio.

How many Bogleheads invest in the Jack Bogle Two Fund Portfolio?

The older I get, the more I wonder!
I currently have 3 fund, but am considering downsizing to the 2 fund.

azanon
Posts: 1992
Joined: Mon Nov 07, 2011 10:34 am
Location: Little Rock, AR

Re: Jack Bogle - Two Fund Portfolio

Post by azanon » Thu May 26, 2016 2:52 pm

pascalwager wrote:
Dandy wrote:
Warren Buffet does seem to really stand by the 10% short-term bonds (cash) figure. He followed up by saying, explicitly, that holding 20, 30, or 40% bonds is "silly".
I believe what Buffet is leaving to his wife is 90% S&P 500 and 10% short term Treasuries? In any event her 10% short term bonds will probably amount to 100's of millions - so no risk to her with that nest egg. I know he is a believer in the US stock market but don't know that he sees only 10% in bonds for normal investors. If he does -- ignore it unless you are very young and very risk tolerant.
I don't believe that Buffet would leave his wife hundreds of millions of dollars. I would guess no more than $10 million. She's already elderly, or nearly-so, they live a modest lifestyle, and live in a farming/ranching oriented state.
Does one leave money to their wife after they die, or is it essentially your wife's to begin when you die because, .... well, you're married?

I'll admit I don't know exactly what kind of asset protection he has against his wife, but I just thought in a general sense if you're married, and you wanted to know your individual net worth, you'd calculate that by dividing you and your spouse's net worth combined by 2. :mrgreen: The only obvious exceptions I'm aware of is if you had money in your name prior to marriage, then never co-mingled after marrying. or 2. You individually inherited money from someone else then never co-mingled that money in a joint account or spent money from that account for a joint expense.

I suspect this can get very complicated, but I would think a spouse is starting off with a really strong claim against their spouse's estate, short of a pre-numptual agreement.

lostdog
Posts: 1297
Joined: Thu Feb 04, 2016 2:15 pm

Re: Jack Bogle - Two Fund Portfolio

Post by lostdog » Thu May 26, 2016 5:23 pm

abuss368 wrote:
lostdog wrote:My Jack Bogle portfolio is Vanguard Total Stock Market Admiral and Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index Fund. Very simple. Re-balance once a year with a 5% band in my retirement accounts. I am not interested in International investing as it most likely won't make a difference anyway ("When experts disagree, it is often because it does not make a foreseeable difference." -- Taylor Larimore, author of The Bogleheads' Guide to Investing).

In my taxable I have the Vanguard Balanced Index Fund Admiral. I have a different goal for my taxable account and it is not part of my retirement AA. I call my taxable account the semi-retirement goal. I am in a low tax bracket, the fund doesn't create capital gains distributions, it's always at a 60/40 AA with no capital gains for rebalancing and I don't care about the long term capital gains when selling small portions of the fund.
Hi lostdog,

You have a very simple and effective investment portfolio. Now stay the course!

Best.
Thanks Abuss. No fiddling with it. :D

tomd37
Posts: 2886
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 10:39 pm
Location: Middle Tennessee

Re: Jack Bogle - Two Fund Portfolio

Post by tomd37 » Thu May 26, 2016 7:32 pm

Can't recall my prior thoughts right now, but for taxable investments doesn't Vanguard have a fund of ~60/40 ratio that uses a tax exempt bond fund along with a good stock fund. I wish my recall was better that it is but age is becoming a factor unfortunately :annoyed
Tom D.

gvsucavie03
Posts: 1351
Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2013 8:30 am

Re: Jack Bogle - Two Fund Portfolio

Post by gvsucavie03 » Thu May 26, 2016 7:49 pm

tomd37 wrote:Can't recall my prior thoughts right now, but for taxable investments doesn't Vanguard have a fund of ~60/40 ratio that uses a tax exempt bond fund along with a good stock fund. I wish my recall was better that it is but age is becoming a factor unfortunately :annoyed
VTMFX is 50/50 US Stock and tax-exempt muni's

tomd37
Posts: 2886
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 10:39 pm
Location: Middle Tennessee

Re: Jack Bogle - Two Fund Portfolio

Post by tomd37 » Thu May 26, 2016 7:53 pm

That is it and thanks a lot.
Tom D.

pinot3
Posts: 38
Joined: Sat Nov 26, 2011 11:24 am

Re: Jack Bogle - Two Fund Portfolio

Post by pinot3 » Fri May 27, 2016 10:26 am

30% VFIAX (Vanguard 500 index Admiral), 70% VBILX (Vanguard Intermediate term bond index Admiral). Thanks to Jack Bogle for 2 fund and Rick Ferri for AA (center of gravity for retirees). 64 and retired. :happy
pinot3 / total expense ratio: .06%

lostdog
Posts: 1297
Joined: Thu Feb 04, 2016 2:15 pm

Re: Jack Bogle - Two Fund Portfolio

Post by lostdog » Fri May 27, 2016 12:53 pm

pinot3 wrote:30% VFIAX (Vanguard 500 index Admiral), 70% VBILX (Vanguard Intermediate term bond index Admiral). Thanks to Jack Bogle for 2 fund and Rick Ferri for AA (center of gravity for retirees). 64 and retired. :happy
Nice plan.

User avatar
BolderBoy
Posts: 4186
Joined: Wed Apr 07, 2010 12:16 pm
Location: Colorado

Re: Jack Bogle - Two Fund Portfolio

Post by BolderBoy » Fri May 27, 2016 2:00 pm

abuss368 wrote:How many Bogleheads invest in the Jack Bogle Two Fund Portfolio?
I do this in my retirement accounts. In taxable I do a tax-exempt bond fund and tax-exempt money market fund.
"Never underestimate one's capacity to overestimate one's abilities" - The Dunning-Kruger Effect

User avatar
fortyofforty
Posts: 1196
Joined: Wed Mar 31, 2010 12:33 pm

Re: Jack Bogle - Two Fund Portfolio

Post by fortyofforty » Fri May 27, 2016 9:53 pm

I heard Jack Bogle in a radio interview several years ago specifically recommend the Balanced Index fund as a "one fund" portfolio, as appropriate for many investors. I believe it was on the Wharton School's business channel.
"In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act." - George Orwell | There are many roads to doublin'. | Original Vanguard Diehard

User avatar
Munir
Posts: 2480
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 4:39 pm
Location: Oregon

Re: Jack Bogle - Two Fund Portfolio

Post by Munir » Sat May 28, 2016 1:09 am

I agree with the concept, but instead of VBILX, and because of its long duration, I use a VBTLX and VFIDX combination which approximates the portfolio of VBILX but with a shorter duration.

VBILX is the Intermediate Bond Index Fund- duration 6.6 years
VFIDX is the Intermediate Investment Grade Fund- duration 5.5 years
VBTLX is the Total Bond Market Fund- duration 5.8 years

The new Core Bond Fund (VBCOX) has a short duration too (5.6 years) but its portfolio has not been finalized yet - as far as I can tell.

rattlenap
Posts: 324
Joined: Wed May 25, 2016 6:22 pm

Re: Jack Bogle - Two Fund Portfolio

Post by rattlenap » Tue Aug 01, 2017 10:31 pm

I do the Vanguard Balanced Index fund and plan on being in that for the rest of my life.

User avatar
siamond
Posts: 4329
Joined: Mon May 28, 2012 5:50 am

Re: Jack Bogle - Two Fund Portfolio

Post by siamond » Tue Aug 01, 2017 11:33 pm

abuss368 wrote:How many Bogleheads invest in the Jack Bogle Two Fund Portfolio?
Seems to me that the folks seeking such level of simplicity would be much better off with a single LifeStrategy fund (pick the one you like based on your tolerance for volatility, and be done with it). This is the recommendation I make to many people I speak with, when I sense that they really don't want to hear much more than that.

PS. I would *not* recommend a Target-Date fund though. Definitely not.

User avatar
stemikger
Posts: 4918
Joined: Thu Apr 08, 2010 5:02 am

Re: Jack Bogle - Two Fund Portfolio

Post by stemikger » Tue Aug 01, 2017 11:37 pm

rattlenap wrote:I do the Vanguard Balanced Index fund and plan on being in that for the rest of my life.
Awesome!! Same here!

Unfortunately, my 401K does not have the balanced index fund, so I hold two funds, but it comes to the same AA (60/40).

I do hold the Balanced Index in my TIRA and upon retirement, it will all go in the balanced index fund (for life).

:sharebeer
Choose Simplicity ~ Stay the Course!! ~ Press on Regardless!!!

User avatar
patrick013
Posts: 2433
Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2015 7:49 pm

Re: Jack Bogle - Two Fund Portfolio

Post by patrick013 » Tue Aug 01, 2017 11:59 pm

abuss368 wrote:
Jack Bogle often recommends a simple investment portfolio of Total Stock and Total Bond.
I think S&P strips were being sold on ezchanges before Bogle went to college.
But even before that they were mostly railroad stocks and a few industrials
I think. But, yeah, give Vanguard the credit for making the 500 stock market
portfolio publicly available.

My first portfolio offered was S&P 500 strips and some CD's from an account
with an exchange broker.

I like the 500 with the IT bond index better than TSM with TBM. That's
probably because of supply and demand and all the buy and hold investors
out there.

But tilt towards something, why not. MC, SC, maybe even utilities.
age in bonds, buy-and-hold, 10 year business cycle

Big Dog
Posts: 924
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2015 4:12 pm

Re: Jack Bogle - Two Fund Portfolio

Post by Big Dog » Wed Aug 02, 2017 12:05 am

Seems to me that the folks seeking such level of simplicity would be much better off with a single LifeStrategy fund (pick the one you like based on your tolerance for volatility, and be done with it).
Since the life strategy funds include international equities and international bonds, doesn't that defeat the purpose of a Two-Fund portfolio ala Jack, in other words, Total Stock and Total Bond (sans international)?

In answer to the OP, 2-Funder here, at least as best as possible. (inherited individual stocks which have a high cap gain, so waiting until I die to pass them on tax free, and one of my 401k's does not offer Total Stock and have had to mix a couple of funds to approximate.)

But 2-funs intent is all-in.

User avatar
oldzey
Posts: 1108
Joined: Sun Apr 13, 2014 8:38 pm
Location: Land of Lincoln

Re: Jack Bogle - Two Fund Portfolio

Post by oldzey » Wed Aug 02, 2017 12:24 am

Affirmative - I use two funds:

Total U.S. Stock Market Index Fund
TIAA Traditional
"The broker said the stock was 'poised to move.' Silly me, I thought he meant up." ― Randy Thurman

Post Reply