Do you use the 9 style-box for AA?
Do you use the 9 style-box for AA?
I have occasionally read posts on this forum that site the Morningstar style box. Sometimes people will share their numbers in each of the 9 boxes. Until now I have only used this as a tool for individual funds but it sounds like some use this for their whole portfolio. If so, is it used in both AA and rebalancing? Is it also used when people are tilting?
My questions may sound a bit scattered but all answers are welcomed as I hope to be educated on this topic.
Thank you.
My questions may sound a bit scattered but all answers are welcomed as I hope to be educated on this topic.
Thank you.
"All Roads Lead to Rome." "Compound interest is the eighth wonder of the world" - Einstein
Re: Do you use the 9 style-box for AA?
Yes, totally, of course. And I started a recent thread about it: http://www.bogleheads.org/forum/viewtop ... 1&t=150267 in which I cited the various sites that I use.
-
- Posts: 602
- Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2010 1:12 am
Re: Do you use the 9 style-box for AA?
Yes, in fact, I primarily use it for seeing how my entire portfolio looks. See livesoft's thread for more info. I find that morningstar works much better for me than Vanguard.
- LAlearning
- Posts: 1365
- Joined: Wed May 09, 2012 12:26 pm
- Location: Los Angeles
Re: Do you use the 9 style-box for AA?
Yes. Very important for evaluating what a fund is made of and how a fund might adjust my allocations.
I know nothing!
Re: Do you use the 9 style-box for AA?
I only use part of the 9 style box for AA. I am pretty much a 3 fund person, but my 401k does not offer a TSM fund. I use the 9 style box to work out the ratio of Large Cap to Small Cap that I want. I figured out the ratio in a couple of minutes. Now I have no use for the 9 style box.
52% TSM, 23% TISM, 24.5% TBM, 0.5% cash
-
- Posts: 102
- Joined: Tue May 13, 2014 1:27 pm
Re: Do you use the 9 style-box for AA?
The other strategy is to look at the factor loadings (if available) .... I suspect this gives a far better idea of where you are allocated than the 9 style box.
-
- Posts: 2327
- Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2011 8:36 pm
Re: Do you use the 9 style-box for AA?
I've used the M* style box to analyze my existing portfolio, but more out of curiosity than for construction. To my knowledge, no authors employ the style box in their AA developments.
VT 60% / VFSUX 20% / TIPS 20%
Re: Do you use the 9 style-box for AA?
At work do you use an S&P 500 fund plus others to try and mimic TSM fund?mhc wrote:I only use part of the 9 style box for AA. I am pretty much a 3 fund person, but my 401k does not offer a TSM fund. I use the 9 style box to work out the ratio of Large Cap to Small Cap that I want. I figured out the ratio in a couple of minutes. Now I have no use for the 9 style box.
"All Roads Lead to Rome." "Compound interest is the eighth wonder of the world" - Einstein
Re: Do you use the 9 style-box for AA?
I used the 9 Box when I was comparing various portfolio allocations, chose one, and haven't looked since then.
I settled on equal amounts of several equity mutual funds, a simplified version of the equities on the Callan Periodic Table. If I were starting over, Trev H's tilted four funds at VG would be my choice.
I settled on equal amounts of several equity mutual funds, a simplified version of the equities on the Callan Periodic Table. If I were starting over, Trev H's tilted four funds at VG would be my choice.
Re: Do you use the 9 style-box for AA?
Yes I do. I settled on 70% S&P500 and 30% Small Cap. It's not exact, but being exact is not that important. When I first started, I tried to match all 9 boxes, but that turned out to be a big waste of time. Close enough is good enough.allroads wrote:At work do you use an S&P 500 fund plus others to try and mimic TSM fund?mhc wrote:I only use part of the 9 style box for AA. I am pretty much a 3 fund person, but my 401k does not offer a TSM fund. I use the 9 style box to work out the ratio of Large Cap to Small Cap that I want. I figured out the ratio in a couple of minutes. Now I have no use for the 9 style box.
52% TSM, 23% TISM, 24.5% TBM, 0.5% cash
Re: Do you use the 9 style-box for AA?
YES! Close enough is definitely good enough.mhc wrote:It's not exact, but being exact is not that important. When I first started, I tried to match all 9 boxes, but that turned out to be a big waste of time. Close enough is good enough.
Re: Do you use the 9 style-box for AA?
I never have paid much attention to the 9 style box
"One does not accumulate but eliminate. It is not daily increase but daily decrease. The height of cultivation always runs to simplicity" –Bruce Lee
- nisiprius
- Advisory Board
- Posts: 52211
- Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 9:33 am
- Location: The terrestrial, globular, planetary hunk of matter, flattened at the poles, is my abode.--O. Henry
Re: Do you use the 9 style-box for AA?
In the past, I've used it just to confirm that there are no surprises. Now that my only stock holdings are Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund and Vanguard Total International Stock Index fund there isn't much need to look at it. If I were doing slice-and-dice I definitely would use it, and definitely over my whole portfolio.
Of course, now that we live in a "five factor world" I think Morningstar needs to introduce an 81-block style-hypercube.
Of course, now that we live in a "five factor world" I think Morningstar needs to introduce an 81-block style-hypercube.
Annual income twenty pounds, annual expenditure nineteen nineteen and six, result happiness; Annual income twenty pounds, annual expenditure twenty pounds ought and six, result misery.
Re: Do you use the 9 style-box for AA?
The style box was in the back of my mind when I set up my "slice and dice" allocation, since I was looking for a lot of diversification. Fidelity uses a similar widget in its display, so I can see how the money is distributed. I don't use it for any type of market timing or reallocation. It's really just a visualization tool, nothing magical about it.
"My bond allocation is the amount of money that I cannot afford to lose." -- Taylor Larimore
- backpacker
- Posts: 1620
- Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2014 2:17 pm
Re: Do you use the 9 style-box for AA?
No. Whoever invented the Morningstar style boxes should be boiled in his own pudding.
1) Morningstar says that a "value" company is one that is cheap and has low growth. But as a value investor, I'm not trying to avoid growth, I'm trying to buy cheap. A growing company that is also cheap is even better, from my perspective, than one that is just cheap. So Morningstar's definition of "value" does not match my investment goals.
2) The style boxes are built using a complex hodgepodge of other metrics. A full 50% of a stock's value/growth score depends on forward looking valuations and long-term growth projections. Where do those projections come from? Morningstar doesn't tell us. How are they weighted? No one knows. Should we believe that Morningstar's experts have working crystal balls? No. Garbage in, garbage out.
1) Morningstar says that a "value" company is one that is cheap and has low growth. But as a value investor, I'm not trying to avoid growth, I'm trying to buy cheap. A growing company that is also cheap is even better, from my perspective, than one that is just cheap. So Morningstar's definition of "value" does not match my investment goals.
2) The style boxes are built using a complex hodgepodge of other metrics. A full 50% of a stock's value/growth score depends on forward looking valuations and long-term growth projections. Where do those projections come from? Morningstar doesn't tell us. How are they weighted? No one knows. Should we believe that Morningstar's experts have working crystal balls? No. Garbage in, garbage out.
Re: Do you use the 9 style-box for AA?
Morningstar's methodology (Size, Valuation) is what it is.allroads wrote:I have occasionally read posts on this forum that site the Morningstar style box. Sometimes people will share their numbers in each of the 9 boxes. Until now I have only used this as a tool for individual funds but it sounds like some use this for their whole portfolio. If so, is it used in both AA and rebalancing? Is it also used when people are tilting?
My questions may sound a bit scattered but all answers are welcomed as I hope to be educated on this topic.
Thank you.
That said, it provides a quick look under the hood of a FUND to better-understand what we own. We can use it for a group of funds as well.
- 1. For the heck of it, I just looked at Vanguard S&P 500 VFINX.
2. A Large Blend fund -- like the S&P 500 -- has several Mid Cap constituents and M* easily and quickly provides this info (12%). It also shows you there is no overweight on the valuation scale -- this, regardless if you buy (or don't buy) their methodology.
Code: Select all
Valuation Size Value Blend Growth Large (88%) 29 29 30 Mid (12%) 05 04 03 Small (0%) 00 00 00
Landy |
Be yourself, everyone else is already taken -- Oscar Wilde
Re: Do you use the 9 style-box for AA?
Would a goal of diversification be to fill all 9 boxes with some minimum number in a total portfolio? The Large line would be highest, right? As the US's total real market has more large company stocks over any other, correct?YDNAL wrote:Morningstar's methodology (Size, Valuation) is what it is.allroads wrote:I have occasionally read posts on this forum that site the Morningstar style box. Sometimes people will share their numbers in each of the 9 boxes. Until now I have only used this as a tool for individual funds but it sounds like some use this for their whole portfolio. If so, is it used in both AA and rebalancing? Is it also used when people are tilting?
My questions may sound a bit scattered but all answers are welcomed as I hope to be educated on this topic.
Thank you.
That said, it provides a quick look under the hood of a FUND to better-understand what we own. We can use it for a group of funds as well.
- 1. For the heck of it, I just looked at Vanguard S&P 500 VFINX.
2. A Large Blend fund -- like the S&P 500 -- has several Mid Cap constituents and M* easily and quickly provides this info (12%). It also shows you there is no overweight on the valuation scale -- this, regardless if you buy (or don't buy) their methodology.Code: Select all
Valuation Size Value Blend Growth Large (88%) 29 29 30 Mid (12%) 05 04 03 Small (0%) 00 00 00
"All Roads Lead to Rome." "Compound interest is the eighth wonder of the world" - Einstein
Re: Do you use the 9 style-box for AA?
You can plug a total stock market fund or ETF into M* x-ray and decide if something different from that is more or less diversified. Note, however, that the actual numbers in the squares are a result of the definitions of the categories and mean nothing fundamental.allroads wrote: Would a goal of diversification be to fill all 9 boxes with some minimum number in a total portfolio? The Large line would be highest, right? As the US's total real market has more large company stocks over any other, correct?
Re: Do you use the 9 style-box for AA?
The 9 boxes for VTSAX looks like this:dbr wrote:You can plug a total stock market fund or ETF into M* x-ray and decide if something different from that is more or less diversified. Note, however, that the actual numbers in the squares are a result of the definitions of the categories and mean nothing fundamental.allroads wrote: Would a goal of diversification be to fill all 9 boxes with some minimum number in a total portfolio? The Large line would be highest, right? As the US's total real market has more large company stocks over any other, correct?
24 23 25
6 6 6
3 3 3
But that's not actually how the real market looks, does it? Are small caps really that "small" of a proportion?
"All Roads Lead to Rome." "Compound interest is the eighth wonder of the world" - Einstein
-
- Posts: 864
- Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 6:16 pm
- Location: cincinnati, oh
Re: Do you use the 9 style-box for AA?
M A R
K E T
I N G
K E T
I N G
Re: Do you use the 9 style-box for AA?
Depends on how you define "small cap". I wonder if M* uses the same definition for US as it does for ex-US and whether that results in the same market cap range for both.allroads wrote:The 9 boxes for VTSAX looks like this:dbr wrote:You can plug a total stock market fund or ETF into M* x-ray and decide if something different from that is more or less diversified. Note, however, that the actual numbers in the squares are a result of the definitions of the categories and mean nothing fundamental.allroads wrote: Would a goal of diversification be to fill all 9 boxes with some minimum number in a total portfolio? The Large line would be highest, right? As the US's total real market has more large company stocks over any other, correct?
24 23 25
6 6 6
3 3 3
But that's not actually how the real market looks, does it? Are small caps really that "small" of a proportion?
-
- Posts: 1079
- Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2011 10:35 am
- Location: Deep in the Balkans
Re: Do you use the 9 style-box for AA?
No. It doesn't let me and it doesn't deal with a lot of what I hold.
Re: Do you use the 9 style-box for AA?
That really is how the market looks. The categories are defined by M*, but that really is the market.allroads wrote:The 9 boxes for VTSAX looks like this:dbr wrote:You can plug a total stock market fund or ETF into M* x-ray and decide if something different from that is more or less diversified. Note, however, that the actual numbers in the squares are a result of the definitions of the categories and mean nothing fundamental.allroads wrote: Would a goal of diversification be to fill all 9 boxes with some minimum number in a total portfolio? The Large line would be highest, right? As the US's total real market has more large company stocks over any other, correct?
24 23 25
6 6 6
3 3 3
But that's not actually how the real market looks, does it? Are small caps really that "small" of a proportion?
52% TSM, 23% TISM, 24.5% TBM, 0.5% cash
-
- Posts: 864
- Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 6:16 pm
- Location: cincinnati, oh
Re: Do you use the 9 style-box for AA?
The style box is a marketing creation and a "crude" way to build a portfolio. Factor exposure and expense is what matters, all else is noise.
Re: Do you use the 9 style-box for AA?
Yes, that is how the real market looks according to the categories as defined. Remember this is market capitalization weighted, so a large number of small companies does not have much market cap. An alternative characterization of a portfolio would be to calculate the Fama-French factor weightings of the portfolio where the TSM has small and value weightings of zero and one can tilt from there. Whether or not tilted is more diversified is a semantic discussion of what the word means.allroads wrote:The 9 boxes for VTSAX looks like this:dbr wrote:You can plug a total stock market fund or ETF into M* x-ray and decide if something different from that is more or less diversified. Note, however, that the actual numbers in the squares are a result of the definitions of the categories and mean nothing fundamental.allroads wrote: Would a goal of diversification be to fill all 9 boxes with some minimum number in a total portfolio? The Large line would be highest, right? As the US's total real market has more large company stocks over any other, correct?
24 23 25
6 6 6
3 3 3
But that's not actually how the real market looks, does it? Are small caps really that "small" of a proportion?