Which is better?

Discuss all general (i.e. non-personal) investing questions and issues, investing news, and theory.
Post Reply
User avatar
Posts: 829
Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2012 12:21 pm
Location: New York

Which is better?

Post by EternalOptimist » Thu Dec 27, 2012 3:31 pm

A general question, are there distinct advantages or disadvantages to owning a 'balanced' fund (60% stocks/40% bonds) over two funds like total stock index (60%) and total bond (40%) :?:
"When nothing goes right....go left"

User avatar
Posts: 3185
Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 2:53 pm

Re: Which is better?

Post by CyberBob » Thu Dec 27, 2012 3:34 pm

The balanced fund is simpler, and so better in that way. But when making withdrawals, you would take money on a pro-rata basis from both stocks and bonds. If you owned seperate stock and bond funds you could make withdrawals from only one (presumably the one that's above its allocation percentage).


Posts: 60949
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 8:00 pm

Re: Which is better?

Post by livesoft » Thu Dec 27, 2012 3:36 pm


A balanced fund hides volatility from you, so that can be an advantage for folks who do not like to see big drops (nobody complains about big gains) in their fund.

But when you withdraw from a balanced fund, you are selling equities AND fixed income, when it may have been better to sell one or the other.

Balanced fund in taxable is less tax efficient. This was discussed recently at length on the forum.

If you have a tax-advantaged account and cannot force yourself to rebalance (buy low, sell high), then let a balanced fund do it for you.
Wiki This signature message sponsored by sscritic: Learn to fish.

Post Reply