Tax loss harvesting question and preventing wash sale. Roth IRA and taxable.

Have a question about your personal investments? No matter how simple or complex, you can ask it here.
Post Reply
Topic Author
chewy8k
Posts: 19
Joined: Tue Aug 13, 2019 11:55 pm

Tax loss harvesting question and preventing wash sale. Roth IRA and taxable.

Post by chewy8k »

Hi bogleheads thank you for your help.

I have a question that involves me owning identical etfs in my Roth IRA and taxable brokerage, and it has me a bit confused. I maxed out my 2025 Roth IRA early January 2025. I purchased shares of avuv 1/8/25 in my Roth IRA, but I also purchased shares of avuv in my taxable brokerage account the same day with left over funds. If I were to sell those shares purchased in my taxable account and shares bought prior to 1/8/25 and repurchase my loss harvesting partner will the shares in my Roth IRA that I do not plan to sell cause an issue? I have dividend reinvestment off on my Roth IRA already. Thank you for any insight.
Last edited by chewy8k on Wed Mar 12, 2025 6:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
cchrissyy
Posts: 2644
Joined: Fri May 05, 2017 10:35 pm
Location: SF bay area

Re: Tax loss harvesting question and preventing wash sale. Roth IRA and taxable.

Post by cchrissyy »

You're fine. Just don't purchase the same ticker symbol for 30 days before or after the date that you're selling for a loss.
65-10-25 us-intl-bond
AnEngineer
Posts: 2974
Joined: Sat Jun 27, 2020 4:05 pm

Re: Tax loss harvesting question and preventing wash sale. Roth IRA and taxable.

Post by AnEngineer »

chewy8k wrote: Wed Mar 12, 2025 5:48 pm I have dividend reinvestment off on my Roth IRA already.
Sounds like you're good. Remember, the wash sale rule only comes into play if you want to deduct a loss (the point of TLH, so definitely involved here) and you buy (or otherwise acquire) substantially identical investments within 30 days (before or after). Sounds like all your purchases are well outside that window, so no issue.
That your facts or argument are wrong does not necessarily mean I disagree with your conclusion
Post Reply