Phase 1 – Now to Retirement (~6 years)
Phase 2 – First 10 Years or Early Retirement
Portfolio Composition
Emergency funds: 3 months living expenses (likely don't need a separate E-fund)
Debt: $0
Tax Filing Status: MFJ
Tax Rate: 24% Federal, 0% State
State of Residence: FL
Age: 36
Desired Asset allocation: 80% stocks / 20% bonds
Desired International allocation: 30% of stocks
Current Asset Allocation: 79% stocks / 21% bonds
Current International allocation: 24.5% of stocks
Portfolio Size: Low seven figures
Current retirement assets
Taxable
41% Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund Admiral Shares (VTSAX) (0.04%)
13% Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund Admiral Shares (VTIAX) (0.11%)
2% Vanguard Intermediate-Term Tax-Exempt Fund Investor Shares (VWIUX) (0.17%)
His TSP
12% G fund (0.043%)
6% I Fund (0.042%)
Her 401k
5% State Street S&P 500 Index Fund - Class A (0.003%)
7% State Street U.S. Bond Index Fund - Class A (0.012%)
Roth IRA at Vanguard (combined values for his/her for post simplicity)
6% Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund Admiral Shares (VTSAX) (0.04%)
8% Vanguard REIT Index Fund Admiral Shares (VGSLX) (0.12%)
Contributions
New annual Contributions
$19,500 his TSP
$19,500 her 401k
$6,000 his Backdoor Roth IRA
$6,000 her Backdoor Roth IRA
$65,000 Taxable
Available funds
Not included – happy with fund selection.
Other Relevant Information
Annual Expenses: ~$110k/year currently (high COL area, includes ~$36k/year daycare expenses)
Retirement Expenses: ~$125k/year (expect H/MCOL area, strong preference for no tax state)
Retirement Pension: ~$60k COLA starting in 2026
Retirement Portfolio Withdrawal Rate: 3.25%
Retirement Tax Rate: 12% Federal, 0% State
Retirement Healthcare: Tricare Prime
Retirement Life Insurance: Payment into Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP)
Children: 2 (both <2 years old)
College: Assume Funded
Questions:
Phase 1 – Now to Retirement (~6 years)
Portfolio and Taxes:
1. Should we consider a glidepath to reduce our equity exposure to start retirement with a more conservative allocation?
- a. Tentative Plan: Shift from 80/20 to 60/40 between now and retirement
b. Rationale: Sequence of returns risk (SRR), particularly in the first 10 years of retirement, appears to be the largest risk for early retirees and a glidepath to lower equity allocation seems to somewhat mitigate this risk
c. Notes: https://earlyretirementnow.com/2017/09/ ... lidepaths/
- a. Tentative Final Plan: Maintain REIT holdings from portfolio
b. Rationale: REITs were originally incorporated into the portfolio because of an expected risk-adjusted performance improvement to the overall portfolio. Although the performance improvement has not manifested over the period held, it may occur in the future if the asset class mean-reverts. Consideration for removing REIT is primarily driven by a desire for simplicity, though its inclusion doesn’t really add much complexity.
c. Notes: N/A
3. Should we continue to purchase munis?
- a. Tentative Plan: Purchase munis until retirement then shift to treasuries.
b. Rationale: Munis appear to be a decent fixed income option in our current tax bracket, but strong preference for highest quality bonds in retirement
c. Notes: Muni holdings are currently a small part of overall portfolio and purchasing treasuries starting now would reduce the need for future changes.
- a. Tentative Plan: No EE or I-Bonds.
b. Rationale: Minimize complexity and number of accounts.
c. Notes: Primary reason for not adding these bonds is the clunky Treasury Direct site (We previously held I-Bonds) and the desire to minimize account complexity. Managing the accounts isn’t difficult, but I also have an eye on keeping things simple should I unexpectedly pass. Adding EE bonds seems sensible given current long-term treasury rates and EE bond return at 20 years, but we wouldn’t be able to redeem them until 14 years into retirement.
- a. Tentative Final Plan: Purchase international in taxable only. Use TSP for rebalancing, if needed.
b. Rationale: Maximize portfolio growth. Foreign tax credit and international in taxable provides slightly higher after-tax return than international in tax-free or tax-deferred.
c. Notes: Slight tax advantage calculated to holding international in taxable accounts.
Phase 2 – First 10 Years or Early Retirement
Portfolio and Taxes:
6. Should we consider a glidepath to increase our equity exposure following retirement?
- a. Tentative Plan: Shift from 60/40 to 80/20 following retirement
b. Rationale: Higher equity exposures have proven to provide best long-term portfolio growth and attendant withdrawal rates, particularly for long retirement periods (i.e. >30 years). Although glidepath to 100/0 has shown superior outperformance for long retirement periods, 80/20 has proven to be a very compatible profile for our risk tolerance.
c. Notes: N/A
- a. Tentative Plan: Switch muni holdings to intermediate term treasuries starting in retirement
b. Rationale: Simple option.
c. Notes: Does not properly account for matching investment horizon with bond duration. Should we instead use long-term treasuries? What would this look like if we’re using the glidepath of increasing equity exposure as noted in #6? How do we balance this with G fund holdings and the ROTH conversions noted in #8 (i.e. reduced access to G fund by the amount converted to ROTH)?
- a. Tentative Plan: Realize ~$50k/year in Long Term Capital Gains (LTCG) and ~$25k/year in ROTH conversions starting in year 1 of retirement until no longer necessary.
b. Rationale: This will keep us in the 12% federal tax bracket to eliminate LTCG tax.
c. Notes: All capital gains will likely be realized within a couple of years (after starting tax gain harvesting in retirement), but ROTH conversions will take much longer. Because of the 5-year window required between ROTH conversion and withdrawal and the need for immediate income at year 1, we’ll initially favor realizing more in Capital Gains. At Year 5, we’ll plan to increase the ROTH conversion amount to ~$48k since the initial ROTH conversion at Year 1 will become available for use and LTCG will no longer be realized. This will keep us in the 12% bracket. But should we instead continue to leave ROTH conversions untapped for maximum portfolio growth? Is there a better way to balance tax bracket, LTCG, ROTH conversions, maximum portfolio growth, and portfolio withdrawals?
9. Should we purchase life insurance for spouse once retired?
- a. Tentative Plan: Purchase small term life policy to cover spouse
b. Rationale: Assuming neither of us work once retired, our future earnings are primarily tied to our pensions. SBP would provide coverage for my pension, but we don’t have any coverage for her pension. Her pension is small (~$10k/year), so ~$250k term life policy might be appropriate. A larger policy may be more sensible if we consider the possibility of her returning to work at some point.
c. Notes: N/A
- a. Tentative Plan: Purchase small term life policy to augment SBP
b. Rationale: Spending would likely not decrease significantly if either myself or spouse passed away and SBP only pays 55% of previous pension.
c. Notes: Coverage stops for children once they’re 18 (or 22 if in schooling).
- a. Tentative Plan: None – Seeking recommendations
