Social Security - general question

Have a question about your personal investments? No matter how simple or complex, you can ask it here.
Post Reply
BostonButterfly
Posts: 54
Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2017 11:49 am
Location: Boston

Social Security - general question

Post by BostonButterfly » Tue Oct 10, 2017 12:41 pm

I have a big picture question about social security. When I log in to the website I see the estimated benefit amounts if I begin taking the benefit at age 62, 67 and 70 (I realize these are estimates and will be fine-tuned the closer I get to age 62). Here are the assumptions for my question:

1. The estimated benefit at 62 is, say, for example, $1,000.
2. I continue to work, earning my current salary, until age 58.
3. I stop working at age 58.
4. At age 58 I have 35 earning years in the “system”.
5. I begin taking my social security benefit at age 62.

Is it correct to say that since I will have 35 earning years by the time I stop working at age 58, my benefit will remain at $1,000 when I begin taking it at age 62 (ignoring fine tuning between now and then)? I won’t be at risk of a reduced age 62 benefit by stopping work at age 58 because I had 35 earning years banked, right? The only thing I give up is the opportunity to increase the age 62 benefit by working beyond age 58 to replace some of the lower earning years with higher earning years. Is that correct?

I am at the very beginning of learning about the intricacies of social security, and realize that I have a ton of learning to accomplish on the subject. But at this point, I’m just looking for big picture understanding to help get a better handle on my retirement planning.

Thanks!

Jack FFR1846
Posts: 5610
Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2013 7:05 am

Re: Social Security - general question

Post by Jack FFR1846 » Tue Oct 10, 2017 12:48 pm

My understanding is that the numbers on the SS site assume you make your current salary until the age listed. So if any of your adjusted 35 year numbers are lower than last year's salary, your SS number will be lower. I have looked for myself and check my adjusted lowest year every year that gets by. I make enough to max the SS payment so look back and for this year, am replacing $40k. So I know that my SS actual would be lower if I were to stop working before the shown ages.
Bogle: Smart Beta is stupid

BostonButterfly
Posts: 54
Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2017 11:49 am
Location: Boston

Re: Social Security - general question

Post by BostonButterfly » Tue Oct 10, 2017 1:22 pm

Thanks Jack.
I plan to download the Anypia calculator and dig into that, but right now I'm still in the big picture mode.
Is it really necessary for the system to be SO complicated?? Maybe its not, as I haven't even dipped my toe in the water yet, but it sure seems like most people you talk to have no clue about the calculations and rules of SS.

marcopolo
Posts: 222
Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2016 10:22 am

Re: Social Security - general question

Post by marcopolo » Tue Oct 10, 2017 2:01 pm

BostonButterfly wrote:
Tue Oct 10, 2017 1:22 pm
Thanks Jack.
Is it really necessary for the system to be SO complicated?? Maybe its not, as I haven't even dipped my toe in the water yet, but it sure seems like most people you talk to have no clue about the calculations and rules of SS.
You are not wrong, it is complicated. Wait till you read about "bend points". The amount you get may be reduced a bit from the estimates due to not having the higher earning years (59-62) to replace the lower earning years 30+ years ago. But, it may not be that big for two reasons. First, those lower earning year from long ago are adjusted by the average wage increases in the intervening years. So, the difference might not be huge depending on how much your wages increased relative to the average (and capped at yearly max). Second, once you hit the second "bend point" based on total SS wage contributions, those replacement years have very little impact you benefit amount. AnyPia will account for all of these complexities.
Once in a while you get shown the light, in the strangest of places if you look at it right.

BostonButterfly
Posts: 54
Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2017 11:49 am
Location: Boston

Re: Social Security - general question

Post by BostonButterfly » Tue Oct 10, 2017 2:07 pm

Eeesh.
Is there a recommended book that covers the 'need to know' stuff, without getting WAY deep into the weeds? I would like to know what I need to know, so that I understand the implications of any decisions I make, but I don't necessarily need to become an expert.

Will AnyPia basically cover everything I need to know?

marcopolo
Posts: 222
Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2016 10:22 am

Re: Social Security - general question

Post by marcopolo » Tue Oct 10, 2017 2:22 pm

BostonButterfly wrote:
Tue Oct 10, 2017 2:07 pm
Eeesh.
Is there a recommended book that covers the 'need to know' stuff, without getting WAY deep into the weeds? I would like to know what I need to know, so that I understand the implications of any decisions I make, but I don't necessarily need to become an expert.

Will AnyPia basically cover everything I need to know?
It depends on how accurate an estimate you want. If you want to be close to exact, you need to consider all the factors. leaving out some of the esoteric complexities will still get you pretty close.
I believe AnyPia does account for all the various complex calculations. I have not used it, but i believe there have been discussion here about how it can be cumbersome to use.

If you are just looking for the difference in benefit between working to 62 and drawing vs working to 58 and drawing at 62, there may be a simpler way to get a fairly accurate estimate of that.
Use the calculator at this link:
https://secure.ssa.gov/acu/ACU_KBA/mai ... =en&LVL=4

You will need to provide you personal information, but then it will use your own salary history, and you can run different scenarios, including working to specific ages. If the age is less than 62, it gives your benefit assuming you start taking benefits at 62.

Good luck.
Once in a while you get shown the light, in the strangest of places if you look at it right.

soccerrules
Posts: 129
Joined: Mon Nov 14, 2016 4:01 pm

Re: Social Security - general question

Post by soccerrules » Tue Oct 10, 2017 5:53 pm

BostonButterfly wrote:
Tue Oct 10, 2017 12:41 pm

Is it correct to say that since I will have 35 earning years by the time I stop working at age 58, my benefit will remain at $1,000 when I begin taking it at age 62 (ignoring fine tuning between now and then)?
I believe you are incorrect. SS online assumes you will continue to earn the same SS taxed income consistently through 62/67. For 2016 the max was $118,500. If you hit this maximum in 2016, the assumptions online is based that you will earn $118,500 exactly through to taking retirement benefits at each age listed.
Don't let your outflow exceed your income or your upkeep will be your downfall.

User avatar
grabiner
Advisory Board
Posts: 20693
Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 11:58 pm
Location: Columbia, MD

Re: Social Security - general question

Post by grabiner » Tue Oct 10, 2017 6:30 pm

soccerrules wrote:
Tue Oct 10, 2017 5:53 pm
BostonButterfly wrote:
Tue Oct 10, 2017 12:41 pm

Is it correct to say that since I will have 35 earning years by the time I stop working at age 58, my benefit will remain at $1,000 when I begin taking it at age 62 (ignoring fine tuning between now and then)?
I believe you are incorrect. SS online assumes you will continue to earn the same SS taxed income consistently through 62/67. For 2016 the max was $118,500. If you hit this maximum in 2016, the assumptions online is based that you will earn $118,500 exactly through to taking retirement benefits at each age listed.
Therefore, if you work at age 59, and earn more (adjusted for wage growth) than you did at age 24, the difference will be added to your Average Indexed Monthly Earnings, increasing your benefit. If you have earned the maximum covered wage for 35 years, your benefit will not change much if you work another year; it may change slightly because the index-linked maximum is not quite fixed.
David Grabiner

ResearchMed
Posts: 5138
Joined: Fri Dec 26, 2008 11:25 pm

Re: Social Security - general question

Post by ResearchMed » Tue Oct 10, 2017 6:59 pm

grabiner wrote:
Tue Oct 10, 2017 6:30 pm
soccerrules wrote:
Tue Oct 10, 2017 5:53 pm
BostonButterfly wrote:
Tue Oct 10, 2017 12:41 pm

Is it correct to say that since I will have 35 earning years by the time I stop working at age 58, my benefit will remain at $1,000 when I begin taking it at age 62 (ignoring fine tuning between now and then)?
I believe you are incorrect. SS online assumes you will continue to earn the same SS taxed income consistently through 62/67. For 2016 the max was $118,500. If you hit this maximum in 2016, the assumptions online is based that you will earn $118,500 exactly through to taking retirement benefits at each age listed.
Therefore, if you work at age 59, and earn more (adjusted for wage growth) than you did at age 24, the difference will be added to your Average Indexed Monthly Earnings, increasing your benefit. If you have earned the maximum covered wage for 35 years, your benefit will not change much if you work another year; it may change slightly because the index-linked maximum is not quite fixed.
Thanks.
You almost answered the question I was about to ask...

IF one has worked at or above the SS ceiling for 35 years and are collecting max SS now (started at age 70, etc.), and one keeps working, also above ceiling... can the SS benefit go below the then current max in the future?
I had understood that the benefit *might* go up, albeit barely noticeably, due to the slight amount added past the second bend point. But can it go down? (Please ignore COLA for this; assume 0% COLA adjustment. Also assume Medicare isn't being withheld.)

Needless to say, if it can indeed "go down" (however slightly), the nice income for the extra year(s) is still well worth it, especially in DH's case, as he'd do much the same thing even if he didn't get paid.
Hence, no "regular retirement" just yet. :wink:

Is there any scenario with continued work above ceiling that the FRA would increase (even if very slightly) such that spousal would go up, even if almost imperceptibly?
(And could spousal go down, per above?)

RM
This signature is a placebo. You are in the control group.

User avatar
grabiner
Advisory Board
Posts: 20693
Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 11:58 pm
Location: Columbia, MD

Re: Social Security - general question

Post by grabiner » Tue Oct 10, 2017 7:05 pm

ResearchMed wrote:
Tue Oct 10, 2017 6:59 pm
IF one has worked at or above the SS ceiling for 35 years and are collecting max SS now (started at age 70, etc.), and one keeps working, also above ceiling... can the SS benefit go below the then current max in the future?
I had understood that the benefit *might* go up, albeit barely noticeably, due to the slight amount added past the second bend point. But can it go down? (Please ignore COLA for this; assume 0% COLA adjustment. Also assume Medicare isn't being withheld.)
The benefit can't go down, because it is based on your 35 index-adjusted highest-earning years. If you work an additional year but the wages in that year are lower than the adjusted wages for 35 previous years, your benefit won't change.
David Grabiner

BostonButterfly
Posts: 54
Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2017 11:49 am
Location: Boston

Re: Social Security - general question

Post by BostonButterfly » Wed Oct 11, 2017 7:24 am

marcopolo wrote:
Tue Oct 10, 2017 2:22 pm

If you are just looking for the difference in benefit between working to 62 and drawing vs working to 58 and drawing at 62, there may be a simpler way to get a fairly accurate estimate of that.
Use the calculator at this link:
https://secure.ssa.gov/acu/ACU_KBA/mai ... =en&LVL=4

You will need to provide you personal information, but then it will use your own salary history, and you can run different scenarios, including working to specific ages. If the age is less than 62, it gives your benefit assuming you start taking benefits at 62.

Good luck.
Thanks for this link, Marcopolo! This is just what I need for my purposes at this point.
Thanks as well to all the others who chimed in. Much appreciated. This is such a great forum!

scrabbler1
Posts: 1943
Joined: Fri Nov 20, 2009 2:39 pm

Re: Social Security - general question

Post by scrabbler1 » Wed Oct 11, 2017 8:20 am

If you are good at spreadsheets, you can create one which mimics the AnyPIA program. I looked at the key calculations within the SS website and created a spreadsheet, before I was able to download and successfully run the AnyPIA program. I later used AnyPIA as a check on my spreadsheet and the two projected monthly benefit amounts were within $1 of each other.

I am an early retiree, as I stopped working 9 years ago after working for 23 years. This means I have many zeroes of SS wages but it mainly froze my SS benefit. Every year or so, I copy and paste a new set of wage indexing factors from the SS website into my spreadsheet. The new set's factors are nearly the same as the previous set, so my frozen SS benefit changes very little, if any. I assume collecting SS at my FRA (Full Retirement Age) but I could easily adjust it should I start at a different age.

soccerrules
Posts: 129
Joined: Mon Nov 14, 2016 4:01 pm

Re: Social Security - general question

Post by soccerrules » Wed Oct 11, 2017 8:27 am

scrabbler1 wrote:
Wed Oct 11, 2017 8:20 am
If you are good at spreadsheets, you can create one which mimics the AnyPIA program. I looked at the key calculations within the SS website and created a spreadsheet, before I was able to download and successfully run the AnyPIA program. I later used AnyPIA as a check on my spreadsheet and the two projected monthly benefit amounts were within $1 of each other.

I am an early retiree, as I stopped working 9 years ago after working for 23 years. This means I have many zeroes of SS wages but it mainly froze my SS benefit. Every year or so, I copy and paste a new set of wage indexing factors from the SS website into my spreadsheet. The new set's factors are nearly the same as the previous set, so my frozen SS benefit changes very little, if any. I assume collecting SS at my FRA (Full Retirement Age) but I could easily adjust it should I start at a different age.
+1
I did the same. The spreadsheet allows you to play with different scenarios and what extra year(s) on indexed earnings might mean to your SS benefit. Once you hit the 2nd bendpoint, it doesn;t change much. You gain much more by waiting to take SS until 67 or 70.

For each increase of $100K of indexed earnings past the 2nd bend point = $35/mo benefit at FRA (less at 62). Hardly really worth it, in my eyes. What is worth it is the income from working and not having to draw down your assets and allowing SS benefit to grow.
Don't let your outflow exceed your income or your upkeep will be your downfall.

User avatar
oldcomputerguy
Posts: 1799
Joined: Sun Nov 22, 2015 6:50 am
Location: In the middle of five acres of woods

Re: Social Security - general question

Post by oldcomputerguy » Wed Oct 11, 2017 8:30 am

BostonButterfly wrote:
Tue Oct 10, 2017 2:07 pm
Eeesh.
Is there a recommended book that covers the 'need to know' stuff, without getting WAY deep into the weeds? I would like to know what I need to know, so that I understand the implications of any decisions I make, but I don't necessarily need to become an expert.

Will AnyPia basically cover everything I need to know?
First off, I second the recommendation of AnyPIA. It's a bit of a pain to get set up (you have to manually enter your earning history), but once it's set up, it's very accurate.

As for book recommendation, to get the big picture, I'd suggest Mike Piper's "Social Security Made Simple".
Anybody know why there's a 20-pound frozen turkey up in the light grid?

smitcat
Posts: 536
Joined: Mon Nov 07, 2016 10:51 am

Re: Social Security - general question

Post by smitcat » Wed Oct 11, 2017 9:03 am

soccerrules wrote:
Wed Oct 11, 2017 8:27 am
scrabbler1 wrote:
Wed Oct 11, 2017 8:20 am
If you are good at spreadsheets, you can create one which mimics the AnyPIA program. I looked at the key calculations within the SS website and created a spreadsheet, before I was able to download and successfully run the AnyPIA program. I later used AnyPIA as a check on my spreadsheet and the two projected monthly benefit amounts were within $1 of each other.

I am an early retiree, as I stopped working 9 years ago after working for 23 years. This means I have many zeroes of SS wages but it mainly froze my SS benefit. Every year or so, I copy and paste a new set of wage indexing factors from the SS website into my spreadsheet. The new set's factors are nearly the same as the previous set, so my frozen SS benefit changes very little, if any. I assume collecting SS at my FRA (Full Retirement Age) but I could easily adjust it should I start at a different age.
+1
I did the same. The spreadsheet allows you to play with different scenarios and what extra year(s) on indexed earnings might mean to your SS benefit. Once you hit the 2nd bendpoint, it doesn;t change much. You gain much more by waiting to take SS until 67 or 70.

For each increase of $100K of indexed earnings past the 2nd bend point = $35/mo benefit at FRA (less at 62). Hardly really worth it, in my eyes. What is worth it is the income from working and not having to draw down your assets and allowing SS benefit to grow.
For each increase of $100K of indexed earnings past the 2nd bend point = $35/mo benefit at FRA (less at 62).
WOW is this eye opening!!! thank you

BostonButterfly
Posts: 54
Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2017 11:49 am
Location: Boston

Re: Social Security - general question

Post by BostonButterfly » Wed Oct 11, 2017 9:14 am

soccerrules wrote:
Wed Oct 11, 2017 8:27 am

For each increase of $100K of indexed earnings past the 2nd bend point = $35/mo benefit at FRA (less at 62). Hardly really worth it, in my eyes. What is worth it is the income from working and not having to draw down your assets and allowing SS benefit to grow.
Interesting, because I was thinking the opposite.....that I would be better off taking SS at 62 to let our nest egg grow. In my case, combined SS of my spouse and I taking benefit at 62 covers a significant portion of expected expenses in retirement. I know.....lots of scenarios and lots of what-ifs. Again, I'm just big picture right now.

Oldcomputerguy: thanks for the book rec.

Scrabbler: maybe I'll create my own spreadsheet. At some point when I have the spare time in my life!

Jack FFR1846
Posts: 5610
Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2013 7:05 am

Re: Social Security - general question

Post by Jack FFR1846 » Wed Oct 11, 2017 9:24 am

In addition to all the complications that currently exist, what's going to happen when the trust fund runs out of money? It's generally expected that around 2034, this will occur and that barring any changes, payouts will drop by 20-25%. I expect this and plan for it. It's something I also use in my spreadsheet to determine when I take SS because the break even point is changed. But there are other complicating factors like medicare premiums and taxes. I honestly haven't even looked at them yet and figure I'll try to wait past 62 both to increase my later payments but also to keep medicare premiums low and I happen to have a son who will start college when I am 62 so it is possible that simply not working, and living from investments might bring in financial aid for the first time ever (son #1 is getting nothing but Stafford loans).
Bogle: Smart Beta is stupid

User avatar
neurosphere
Posts: 2554
Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2010 1:55 pm
Location: NYC
Contact:

Re: Social Security - general question

Post by neurosphere » Wed Oct 11, 2017 10:00 am

[This post is deleted. I was wrong]
Last edited by neurosphere on Mon Oct 16, 2017 4:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.

soccerrules
Posts: 129
Joined: Mon Nov 14, 2016 4:01 pm

Re: Social Security - general question

Post by soccerrules » Wed Oct 11, 2017 10:07 am

BostonButterfly wrote:
Wed Oct 11, 2017 9:14 am
soccerrules wrote:
Wed Oct 11, 2017 8:27 am

For each increase of $100K of indexed earnings past the 2nd bend point = $35/mo benefit at FRA (less at 62). Hardly really worth it, in my eyes. What is worth it is the income from working and not having to draw down your assets and allowing SS benefit to grow.
Interesting, because I was thinking the opposite.....that I would be better off taking SS at 62 to let our nest egg grow. In my case, combined SS of my spouse and I taking benefit at 62 covers a significant portion of expected expenses in retirement. I know.....lots of scenarios and lots of what-ifs. Again, I'm just big picture right now.

Oldcomputerguy: thanks for the book rec.

Scrabbler: maybe I'll create my own spreadsheet. At some point when I have the spare time in my life!
BB-
my point was once you have passed the 2nd bend point the act of working longer to increase your SS benefit is not really worth it for that purpose only (growing SS benefit). There is a larger impact in growing your SS benefit , in waiting to claim based on the 6-8% yearly increase in the benefit from 62-70. I like you have wrestled with taking SS at 62 to allow for nest egg to grow vs spend nest egg and allow SS benefit grow and delay filing.

I believe the 2nd bend point starts at around $2.25M ($64K a yr) of indexed earnings over 35 years ($5,336 PIA * 420 = $2,241,120)
Don't let your outflow exceed your income or your upkeep will be your downfall.

User avatar
neurosphere
Posts: 2554
Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2010 1:55 pm
Location: NYC
Contact:

Re: Social Security - general question

Post by neurosphere » Wed Oct 11, 2017 10:08 am

For those who are interested, here is a graph which shows how the FUTURE (inflation adjusted) benefits can change based on differences between wage growth and CPI between "now" and "later":

Image

(taken from this thread: viewtopic.php?f=2&t=204221)

Here are the fixed parameters for the chart: An earner born in 1970, with 35 years of maximal earnings from age 26 to age 60. Historical/actual values are used until 2015 for earnings, CPI, and wage info. Then from 2016 onwards earnings are set to the maximum, and CPI and Wage assumptions are as shown on the graph. The benefit is the age 67 benefit, inflation adjusted to december 2015 dollars.

The black line represents Wage growth = CPI growth each year.
Last edited by neurosphere on Mon Oct 16, 2017 4:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-- Real name: Sotirios Keros. If you have to ask "Is a Target Retirement fund right for me?", the answer is yes.

User avatar
neurosphere
Posts: 2554
Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2010 1:55 pm
Location: NYC
Contact:

Re: Social Security - general question

Post by neurosphere » Wed Oct 11, 2017 10:27 am

(deleted, duplicate)
Last edited by neurosphere on Mon Oct 16, 2017 4:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.

soccerrules
Posts: 129
Joined: Mon Nov 14, 2016 4:01 pm

Re: Social Security - general question

Post by soccerrules » Wed Oct 11, 2017 10:39 am

neurosphere wrote:
Wed Oct 11, 2017 10:00 am
BostonButterfly wrote:
Tue Oct 10, 2017 12:41 pm
Here are the assumptions for my question:

1. The estimated benefit at 62 is, say, for example, $1,000.
2. I continue to work, earning my current salary, until age 58.
3. I stop working at age 58.
4. At age 58 I have 35 earning years in the “system”.
5. I begin taking my social security benefit at age 62.

Is it correct to say that since I will have 35 earning years by the time I stop working at age 58, my benefit will remain at $1,000 when I begin taking it at age 62 (ignoring fine tuning between now and then)?
For the assumptions you list, I believe the benefit you see on the SSA website (or on the green statements they send you) will be correct. That is, if you have 35 years of maximal earnings by age 58, then your benefit at age 62 will not change, even though the estimate assumes you will work until age 62. But working past 35 year of max earnings does not change your averaged indexed monthly earnings (AIME) and thus a benefit (which is based on your record) does not change with those extra earnings, at least in terms of the benefit that the SS estimates calculate for you.
I think there lies the difference. Yes if OP has already hit 35 years of maximum earnings, it will not matter at all. In the OP's comments there is no mention of hitting maximums for 35 years, just "35 years in the system", assuming no $0's.

So the question is "what happens from 58-62 with no income, does it change the assumptions from the SSA website?"
1) If you hit 35 maximum years by 58 -- NO
2) if you don't hit 35 maximum by 58 -- yes -- the how much is really the difference between the max indexed earnings for those 4 years and the 4 years of lower indexed earnings that the OP would replace if OP continued to work from 58-62.

The potential difference is $0 (#1 above) and roughly $700K in indexed earnings. (Maxed indexed earnings tend to fall between $170-180K earnings each year, if you hit the SS max for any given year; times 4 for our 58-62 example). If $100K in indexed earnings = $35/mo SS benefit at FRA -- then the maximum difference in our scenario would be @ $250/mo at FRA. Not adjusted for 75% reduction for taking at 62 ($187.5)

So the range of difference in payout at 62 is $0/mo to $187/mo. (slight rounding here)
The OP mentioned working 35 years, so the amount will be less than $187/mo depending on that difference in the replacement years indexed earnings. If it only increases the Indexed earnings by $200K, than the change will be about $50/mo at 62.
Don't let your outflow exceed your income or your upkeep will be your downfall.

mptfan
Posts: 4126
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 9:58 am

Re: Social Security - general question

Post by mptfan » Wed Oct 11, 2017 11:08 am

neurosphere wrote:
Wed Oct 11, 2017 10:00 am
But there is a KEY point to remember. The SS estimates assume ZERO wage growth, and ZERO inflation from today onward.
I don't think this is true. This is what the Social Security Administration says...

"Estimated benefits are adjusted for economy-wide average wage growth from about the time of Statement issuance to about the time of retirement."

https://www.ssa.gov/policy/docs/rsnotes/rsn2008-05.html
I eat risk for breakfast. :)

User avatar
neurosphere
Posts: 2554
Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2010 1:55 pm
Location: NYC
Contact:

Re: Social Security - general question

Post by neurosphere » Wed Oct 11, 2017 11:14 am

soccerrules wrote:
Wed Oct 11, 2017 10:39 am
I think there lies the difference. Yes if OP has already hit 35 years of maximum earnings, it will not matter at all. In the OP's comments there is no mention of hitting maximums for 35 years, just "35 years in the system", assuming no $0's.
Thanks for catching that! You are right, I just assumed the OP was referring to maximal earnings, which he/she did not state and I should not have assumed. I must have been asleep the week in school they taught reading comprehension.
soccerrules wrote:
Wed Oct 11, 2017 10:39 am
So the question is "what happens from 58-62 with no income, does it change the assumptions from the SSA website?"
1) If you hit 35 maximum years by 58 -- NO
2) if you don't hit 35 maximum by 58 -- yes -- the how much is really the difference between the max indexed earnings for those 4 years and the 4 years of lower indexed earnings that the OP would replace if OP continued to work from 58-62.
Keep in mind that the SS estimates assume that the CURRENT (most recently reported) salary will be earned until the claiming age/date, which after indexing may or not be higher than any other earnings. We don't know what happens to the OP's "top 35 years" if his current earnings are projected forward to age 62. The forward projected earnings may change the AIME, or they may not.

And just a reminder that we already know what index will be applied to the earnings at age 60+61 when the age 62 benefit is calculated: "1.0". Although we don't yet know the base this "1" will be applied to. :D
-- Real name: Sotirios Keros. If you have to ask "Is a Target Retirement fund right for me?", the answer is yes.

BostonButterfly
Posts: 54
Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2017 11:49 am
Location: Boston

Re: Social Security - general question

Post by BostonButterfly » Wed Oct 11, 2017 11:41 am

soccerrules wrote:
Wed Oct 11, 2017 10:39 am
neurosphere wrote:
Wed Oct 11, 2017 10:00 am
BostonButterfly wrote:
Tue Oct 10, 2017 12:41 pm
Here are the assumptions for my question:

1. The estimated benefit at 62 is, say, for example, $1,000.
2. I continue to work, earning my current salary, until age 58.
3. I stop working at age 58.
4. At age 58 I have 35 earning years in the “system”.
5. I begin taking my social security benefit at age 62.

Is it correct to say that since I will have 35 earning years by the time I stop working at age 58, my benefit will remain at $1,000 when I begin taking it at age 62 (ignoring fine tuning between now and then)?
For the assumptions you list, I believe the benefit you see on the SSA website (or on the green statements they send you) will be correct. That is, if you have 35 years of maximal earnings by age 58, then your benefit at age 62 will not change, even though the estimate assumes you will work until age 62. But working past 35 year of max earnings does not change your averaged indexed monthly earnings (AIME) and thus a benefit (which is based on your record) does not change with those extra earnings, at least in terms of the benefit that the SS estimates calculate for you.
I think there lies the difference. Yes if OP has already hit 35 years of maximum earnings, it will not matter at all. In the OP's comments there is no mention of hitting maximums for 35 years, just "35 years in the system", assuming no $0's.

So the question is "what happens from 58-62 with no income, does it change the assumptions from the SSA website?"
1) If you hit 35 maximum years by 58 -- NO
2) if you don't hit 35 maximum by 58 -- yes -- the how much is really the difference between the max indexed earnings for those 4 years and the 4 years of lower indexed earnings that the OP would replace if OP continued to work from 58-62.

The potential difference is $0 (#1 above) and roughly $700K in indexed earnings. (Maxed indexed earnings tend to fall between $170-180K earnings each year, if you hit the SS max for any given year; times 4 for our 58-62 example). If $100K in indexed earnings = $35/mo SS benefit at FRA -- then the maximum difference in our scenario would be @ $250/mo at FRA. Not adjusted for 75% reduction for taking at 62 ($187.5)

So the range of difference in payout at 62 is $0/mo to $187/mo. (slight rounding here)
The OP mentioned working 35 years, so the amount will be less than $187/mo depending on that difference in the replacement years indexed earnings. If it only increases the Indexed earnings by $200K, than the change will be about $50/mo at 62.
Soccerrules - you are correct. I will not have 35 years of max earnings.
All of these comments of course create more and more questions for me, but I realize I need to educate myself on the subject. I can't just keep on asking questions. I've used the quick and dirty calculator that Marcopolo pointed me to, which is a great starting point for me. I plan to read some books on the topic and get a better understanding.

It's shameful that this is so overly complex. I consider myself fairly intelligent, and I know I'm in for learning curve. I feel for people who don't have the resources or wherewithal to learn the ins and outs of social security. Especially for folks who will be entirely dependent upon it.

Thanks again, everyone. So very much appreciated.

Admiral
Posts: 813
Joined: Mon Oct 27, 2014 12:35 pm

Re: Social Security - general question

Post by Admiral » Wed Oct 11, 2017 11:54 am

BostonButterfly wrote:
Wed Oct 11, 2017 9:14 am
soccerrules wrote:
Wed Oct 11, 2017 8:27 am

For each increase of $100K of indexed earnings past the 2nd bend point = $35/mo benefit at FRA (less at 62). Hardly really worth it, in my eyes. What is worth it is the income from working and not having to draw down your assets and allowing SS benefit to grow.
Interesting, because I was thinking the opposite.....that I would be better off taking SS at 62 to let our nest egg grow. In my case, combined SS of my spouse and I taking benefit at 62 covers a significant portion of expected expenses in retirement. I know.....lots of scenarios and lots of what-ifs. Again, I'm just big picture right now.

Oldcomputerguy: thanks for the book rec.

Scrabbler: maybe I'll create my own spreadsheet. At some point when I have the spare time in my life!
Unless you die early (!), most research shows that you are better off drawing from your portfolio (assuming you have enough saved) than taking SS early, because of the significant increase in the benefit the longer you wait. Because it's an annuity (never runs out) that also includes COLA, it's a very good deal. Now, if you don't actually need the money (like, say, you are still working or have a massive portfolio) then you could conceivably take SS early and invest it. But that return is not guaranteed. The return on waiting IS guaranteed (provided, of course, you are alive to claim it!)

Here's a pretty good, clear take on how Vanguard feels about it:

https://advisors.vanguard.com/VGApp/iip ... urityStart
In the past, the decision as to the "right" time to claim Social Security has often been based on a break-even analysis of a retiree's expected benefits versus his or her life expectancy. That approach, however, ignores two key features of Social Security, namely: Once you start receiving it, it's paid for the rest of your life, no matter how long you live, and is adjusted upward for inflation. A big concern for most retirees is the risk of outliving their savings. For many retirees who can afford to do so, deferring Social Security for a few years (even past their "full retirement age"—defined by Social Security according to one’s birth year—to the maximum annual benefit at age 70) greatly increases their lifetime monthly benefit. Given that at age 65, more than 50% of women can expect to live past age 88 (and 50% of men past 85), delaying Social Security can provide powerful longevity protection.

runner540
Posts: 349
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2017 5:43 pm

Re: Social Security - general question

Post by runner540 » Wed Oct 11, 2017 12:34 pm

BostonButterfly wrote:
Wed Oct 11, 2017 11:41 am
soccerrules wrote:
Wed Oct 11, 2017 10:39 am
neurosphere wrote:
Wed Oct 11, 2017 10:00 am
BostonButterfly wrote:
Tue Oct 10, 2017 12:41 pm
Here are the assumptions for my question:

1. The estimated benefit at 62 is, say, for example, $1,000.
2. I continue to work, earning my current salary, until age 58.
3. I stop working at age 58.
4. At age 58 I have 35 earning years in the “system”.
5. I begin taking my social security benefit at age 62.

Is it correct to say that since I will have 35 earning years by the time I stop working at age 58, my benefit will remain at $1,000 when I begin taking it at age 62 (ignoring fine tuning between now and then)?
For the assumptions you list, I believe the benefit you see on the SSA website (or on the green statements they send you) will be correct. That is, if you have 35 years of maximal earnings by age 58, then your benefit at age 62 will not change, even though the estimate assumes you will work until age 62. But working past 35 year of max earnings does not change your averaged indexed monthly earnings (AIME) and thus a benefit (which is based on your record) does not change with those extra earnings, at least in terms of the benefit that the SS estimates calculate for you.
I think there lies the difference. Yes if OP has already hit 35 years of maximum earnings, it will not matter at all. In the OP's comments there is no mention of hitting maximums for 35 years, just "35 years in the system", assuming no $0's.

So the question is "what happens from 58-62 with no income, does it change the assumptions from the SSA website?"
1) If you hit 35 maximum years by 58 -- NO
2) if you don't hit 35 maximum by 58 -- yes -- the how much is really the difference between the max indexed earnings for those 4 years and the 4 years of lower indexed earnings that the OP would replace if OP continued to work from 58-62.

The potential difference is $0 (#1 above) and roughly $700K in indexed earnings. (Maxed indexed earnings tend to fall between $170-180K earnings each year, if you hit the SS max for any given year; times 4 for our 58-62 example). If $100K in indexed earnings = $35/mo SS benefit at FRA -- then the maximum difference in our scenario would be @ $250/mo at FRA. Not adjusted for 75% reduction for taking at 62 ($187.5)

So the range of difference in payout at 62 is $0/mo to $187/mo. (slight rounding here)
The OP mentioned working 35 years, so the amount will be less than $187/mo depending on that difference in the replacement years indexed earnings. If it only increases the Indexed earnings by $200K, than the change will be about $50/mo at 62.
Soccerrules - you are correct. I will not have 35 years of max earnings.
All of these comments of course create more and more questions for me, but I realize I need to educate myself on the subject. I can't just keep on asking questions. I've used the quick and dirty calculator that Marcopolo pointed me to, which is a great starting point for me. I plan to read some books on the topic and get a better understanding.

It's shameful that this is so overly complex. I consider myself fairly intelligent, and I know I'm in for learning curve. I feel for people who don't have the resources or wherewithal to learn the ins and outs of social security. Especially for folks who will be entirely dependent upon it.

Thanks again, everyone. So very much appreciated.
BostonButterfly, best wishes as you clamber up the learning curve. Like much of policy and taxes, it started simple, and got more complex as voters and policy makers added features, reformed it to last longer, and deal with perceived inequities.

As I understand it, the biggest decision for lower earners is when to claim. The other complexity, such as bend points, taxation of benefits, etc. are less relevant.

Lower earners get a much bigger % of their SS taxed earnings "back to them" in SS benefits than high earners:

https://www.cbpp.org/social-security-be ... rogressive

soccerrules
Posts: 129
Joined: Mon Nov 14, 2016 4:01 pm

Re: Social Security - general question

Post by soccerrules » Wed Oct 11, 2017 12:54 pm

Boston-
No worries. Once you start to understand the process and then start to look at your own record, it will be a little more clear.

You can look-up the current indexing factors through the SS website. ex: SS taxed income for 1985 for someone turning 62 in 2017 has a factor of 4.22767. SS taxed income of $25,000 in 1985 would be indexed to $105,691 in today's dollars. For example if this was you ($25K in 1985) you would need to have a yearly indexed earnings higher than $105,691 in future years to "replace" that 1985 year. If you had lower years or had not reached 35 years of earnings-- the new/future year would replace the $0 or the lowest indexed year.
As you consider the years from age 58-62, you would evaluate if the potential earnings for 58,59,60-62 would be higher than the indexed earnings for any of those prior years.
Also the closer you get to age 60 -- your earnings have almost no indexing applied to them. At age 60 -- indexing stops. ($1=$1)
(this may be automatically included in the application you download from the SS site?-- i haven't done that)

I have a few years in HS were i had SS taxed income and my indexed earnings were less than $20K. So assuming I hit 35 years earnings this year. Any year going forward that my indexed earnings is higher than $20K , that replaces one of those HS years.

This "replacing prior years" process losses it's BIG impact when these 2 things happen:
1) you reach $2.25M (currently) in your 35 year total indexed earnings and reach the 2nd "bend point". $100K increase is only worth $35/mo at FRA.
2) When net difference from a current year and a prior year starts to shrink. If you are only adding $20K in indexed earnings to your 35 year total for working an additional year, it only adds $7/mo to SS benefit at FRA.(assuming you hit 2nd bend point). Now you do benefit from the real income that year that allows you to potentially delaying SS and having to use your nest egg, just not really adding to your SS benefit.
Don't let your outflow exceed your income or your upkeep will be your downfall.

User avatar
neurosphere
Posts: 2554
Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2010 1:55 pm
Location: NYC
Contact:

Re: Social Security - general question

Post by neurosphere » Wed Oct 11, 2017 1:16 pm

soccerrules wrote:
Wed Oct 11, 2017 12:54 pm
Also the closer you get to age 60 -- your earnings have almost no indexing applied to them. At age 60 -- indexing stops. ($1=$1)
(this may be automatically included in the application you download from the SS site?-- i haven't done that)
If you are referring to AnyPia, the default assumptions assume no changes in wage growth from today forward. So indexing is basically "1" from one's current age forward. There are "advanced" settings where you can change these assumptions to any one of three separate pre-selected "SS Trustee" assumptions, or where you can input your own assumptions for CPI and Wage Index changes for every possible year.

If one does enable the non-default assumptions, then yes of course, the program stops indexing from age 60 onwards, rather than stopping indexing from today onward*.

NS

* To be more precise, wage data are not yet available for the past 2 or so years. So Anypia's defaults take the most recent available NAWI fix that NAWI from the most recent year and projects that same value forward. In a way, it's as if the program "makes" you age 62 as far as indexing goes, but not for other age-based calculations. It HAS to, unless you want to enter your own (non-zero) wage growth estimates. :D
-- Real name: Sotirios Keros. If you have to ask "Is a Target Retirement fund right for me?", the answer is yes.

Post Reply