
let's talk about strategies for which one to invest more in and why.
Wouldn't you make more money if you just chose one or the other and put all 5k into one, so that more would compound over time?
Depends on your marginal tax bracket. If it is low at present, put it all into a Roth IRA.TheDev wrote:ok, so this means I'm going to have to decide how much to put into each the traditional and Roth IRA...![]()
let's talk about strategies for which one to invest more in and why.
Wouldn't you make more money if you just chose one or the other and put all 5k into one, so that more would compound over time?
my annual salary is currently 54k before taxes.rr2 wrote:Depends on your marginal tax bracket. If it is low at present, put it all into a Roth IRA.TheDev wrote:ok, so this means I'm going to have to decide how much to put into each the traditional and Roth IRA...![]()
let's talk about strategies for which one to invest more in and why.
Wouldn't you make more money if you just chose one or the other and put all 5k into one, so that more would compound over time?
No. Basic math.TheDev wrote:Wouldn't you make more money if you just chose one or the other and put all 5k into one, so that more would compound over time?
This type of question cannot be answered accurately in a vacuum. If you really want to know the answer, you need to post all the information requested in Asking Portfolio Questions (link at bottom of this message). Tax bracket is only one factor. Other factors include how much you are saving, the expense ratios in your 401k if you have one, debt and the interest rates on your debt, etc.TheDev wrote:my annual salary is currently 54k before taxes.rr2 wrote:Depends on your marginal tax bracket. If it is low at present, put it all into a Roth IRA.TheDev wrote:ok, so this means I'm going to have to decide how much to put into each the traditional and Roth IRA...![]()
let's talk about strategies for which one to invest more in and why.
Wouldn't you make more money if you just chose one or the other and put all 5k into one, so that more would compound over time?
From what I know off the top of my head...retiredjg wrote:This type of question cannot be answered accurately in a vacuum. If you really want to know the answer, you need to post all the information requested in Asking Portfolio Questions (link at bottom of this message). Tax bracket is only one factor. Other factors include how much you are saving, the expense ratios in your 401k if you have one, debt and the interest rates on your debt, etc.TheDev wrote:my annual salary is currently 54k before taxes.rr2 wrote:Depends on your marginal tax bracket. If it is low at present, put it all into a Roth IRA.TheDev wrote:ok, so this means I'm going to have to decide how much to put into each the traditional and Roth IRA...![]()
let's talk about strategies for which one to invest more in and why.
Wouldn't you make more money if you just chose one or the other and put all 5k into one, so that more would compound over time?
I agree with retiredjg. This will be a great exercise and you will find it very useful. Spend some time doing this.retiredjg wrote:This type of question cannot be answered accurately in a vacuum. If you really want to know the answer, you need to post all the information requested in Asking Portfolio Questions (link at bottom of this message). Tax bracket is only one factor. Other factors include how much you are saving, the expense ratios in your 401k if you have one, debt and the interest rates on your debt, etc.TheDev wrote:my annual salary is currently 54k before taxes.rr2 wrote:Depends on your marginal tax bracket. If it is low at present, put it all into a Roth IRA.TheDev wrote:ok, so this means I'm going to have to decide how much to put into each the traditional and Roth IRA...![]()
let's talk about strategies for which one to invest more in and why.
Wouldn't you make more money if you just chose one or the other and put all 5k into one, so that more would compound over time?
I'm sorry, but "off the top of my head" is just not good enough.TheDev wrote:From what I know off the top of my head...retiredjg wrote:This type of question cannot be answered accurately in a vacuum. If you really want to know the answer, you need to post all the information requested in Asking Portfolio Questions (link at bottom of this message). Tax bracket is only one factor. Other factors include how much you are saving, the expense ratios in your 401k if you have one, debt and the interest rates on your debt, etc.TheDev wrote:my annual salary is currently 54k before taxes.rr2 wrote:Depends on your marginal tax bracket. If it is low at present, put it all into a Roth IRA.TheDev wrote:ok, so this means I'm going to have to decide how much to put into each the traditional and Roth IRA...![]()
let's talk about strategies for which one to invest more in and why.
Wouldn't you make more money if you just chose one or the other and put all 5k into one, so that more would compound over time?
$65k of student loan debt at 6.35%
saving: $6,000
not sure about the expense ratio on my 401k
I am contributing 6% of my salary to the 401k, up to the company match
I am mainly concerned about paying all my debt as soon as possible, and I'm living with family now in order to minimize expenses and make large payments on my loans.
Why can't you find out the things you don't know? There is nothing requested there that you don't need to know, so you might as well start learning about it now. If you have a question about how to answer a question, just ask.TheDev wrote:I don't know all of that information.
That just means you have less to post and fewer things that need to be fixed.Also, the majority of the info they are requesting is dealing with investments. The only investment I have right now would be my 401k.
TheDev,TheDev wrote: I didn't understand that before. Now, I do. The books I've been reading that mentioned Roth IRA's have apparently been missing some crucial information.
You can't make an informed decision without that information and you can't expect to receive solid advice here without providing that information. Digging up all that information and piecing it together is both a learning exercise and the most effective way to ask for help. Check out other threads in this sub-forum to see what I mean.TheDev wrote:I don't know all of that information. I'll probably just hold off until April and then go ahead with the Roth.
Also, the majority of the info they are requesting there is dealing with investments. The only thing I have for investments right now would be my 401k.
I wouldn't necessarily assume that the fault lay with the books.grap0013 wrote:No offense, but you need to read some new books.TheDev wrote: I didn't understand that before. Now, I do. The books I've been reading that mentioned Roth IRA's have apparently been missing some crucial information.
[Inappropriate remarks removed by admin LadyGeek]grap0013 wrote:TheDev,TheDev wrote: I didn't understand that before. Now, I do. The books I've been reading that mentioned Roth IRA's have apparently been missing some crucial information.
No offense, but you need to read some new books. Check out some of the books from the reading list on here http://www.bogleheads.org/readbooks.htm and then you can come back on Bogleheads and reread this thread to get a chuckle about some of your posts. (I mean this in the nicest way and it happens to everyone who sticks around here)
FWIW, the estimates of return I use for my portfolio are 8-12%.
No, because compounding multiplies money If you put $2500 each into two different accounts and invest them the same way, you will have the same total as if you put $5000 into a single account.TheDev wrote:ok, so this means I'm going to have to decide how much to put into each the traditional and Roth IRA...![]()
let's talk about strategies for which one to invest more in and why.
Wouldn't you make more money if you just chose one or the other and put all 5k into one, so that more would compound over time?
You should continue your 401k up to the company match, and put all of your other available funds against the student loan until it is paid off, as it's costing you $4,000 a year in interest. By the time you get that paid off you'll have IRA and Roths all figured out.TheDev wrote:I'll probably just hold off until April and then go ahead with the Roth.
haha yeah that's what I was thinking. Just focus on paying off my debt for now so I can have lots of time to read all of grap0013's books. He has a portfolio with 8-12% after allBigFoot48 wrote:You should continue your 401k up to the company match, and put all of your other available funds against the student loan until it is paid off, as it's costing you $4,000 a year in interest. By the time you get that paid off you'll have IRA and Roths all figured out.TheDev wrote:I'll probably just hold off until April and then go ahead with the Roth.
Hey that was my first post on this thread and I said things like, "No offense" and "I mean this in the nicest way..." I am honestly trying to help you.TheDev wrote:[inappropriate remarks removed by admin LadyGeek]grap0013 wrote:TheDev,TheDev wrote: I didn't understand that before. Now, I do. The books I've been reading that mentioned Roth IRA's have apparently been missing some crucial information.
No offense, but you need to read some new books. Check out some of the books from the reading list on here http://www.bogleheads.org/readbooks.htm and then you can come back on Bogleheads and reread this thread to get a chuckle about some of your posts. (I mean this in the nicest way and it happens to everyone who sticks around here)
FWIW, the estimates of return I use for my portfolio are 8-12%.
Alright, so since I'm paying taxes at the 25% rate, the Roth would be the better option for me. Ok, I will start that either in April 2013 or April 2014 depending upon how I feel about my debt situation at those points.grabiner wrote:No, because compounding multiplies money If you put $2500 each into two different accounts and invest them the same way, you will have the same total as if you put $5000 into a single account.TheDev wrote:ok, so this means I'm going to have to decide how much to put into each the traditional and Roth IRA...![]()
let's talk about strategies for which one to invest more in and why.
Wouldn't you make more money if you just chose one or the other and put all 5k into one, so that more would compound over time?
The reason to prefer one account over the other is the tax situation. If you put $3000 into your Roth IRA and invest at an 8% return for 40 years, you will have $65,174. If you put $4000 into a deductible traditional IRA in a 25% tax bracket, that only costs you $3000 because you get $1000 back in taxes. If you invest that at an 8% return for 40 years, you will have $86,898, but you will pay taxes when you withdraw the money. If you pay taxes at a rate of 25%, you will pay $21,724 in tax and have $65,174 after tax, so the traditional and Roth options are equally good. If you pay taxes at a rate of less than 25%, then you will have more than $65,174 after tax, so the traditional option is better.
If you aren't eligible for a deductible traditional IRA (because you are over the income limits), you can get the same benefit by investing in your 401(k), which is taxed the same way. However, in order for us to give you any advice on that, we need to know your 401(k) options. While the 401(k) is taxed the same way as an IRA, many 401(k) plans have poor choices and will probably have lower returns than similar investments in an IRA. (And conversely, no matter how bad your 401(k) is, you should get the employer match, as that is an instant 50% or 100% return on your money.)
If that is true, you need to do what people have mentioned several times.TheDev wrote:That is the whole point of me asking these questions and trying to learn more information.
What you fail to see is how much trouble people have already go to for your benefit when there was no possibility of receiving a benefit back. Now you accuse them of being snobs? Why would a snob even bother to try to help you out? It simply doesn't make sense.You also absolutely fail to take into account....
I'm starting to rue the day I entered this thread. I'm half joking.TheDev wrote:haha yeah that's what I was thinking. Just focus on paying off my debt for now so I can have lots of time to read all of grap0013's books. He has a portfolio with 8-12% after allBigFoot48 wrote:You should continue your 401k up to the company match, and put all of your other available funds against the student loan until it is paid off, as it's costing you $4,000 a year in interest. By the time you get that paid off you'll have IRA and Roths all figured out.TheDev wrote:I'll probably just hold off until April and then go ahead with the Roth.
I am currently reading The Bogleheads Guide to Investing, which is on your list. I am also reading 2 other books on investing which are not on your list. I am also reading posts and contributing in conversations on this board. Most people my age (25) don't know much about investing and are making poor financial decisions, so I believe that beginning investors should be welcomed into the conversation, rather than shut out of it based upon what they currently do not know, but are willing to learn.grap0013 wrote:Hey that was my first post on this thread and I said things like, "No offense" and "I mean this in the nicest way..." I am honestly trying to help you.TheDev wrote:[inappropriate remarks removed by admin LadyGeek]grap0013 wrote:TheDev,TheDev wrote: I didn't understand that before. Now, I do. The books I've been reading that mentioned Roth IRA's have apparently been missing some crucial information.
No offense, but you need to read some new books. Check out some of the books from the reading list on here http://www.bogleheads.org/readbooks.htm and then you can come back on Bogleheads and reread this thread to get a chuckle about some of your posts. (I mean this in the nicest way and it happens to everyone who sticks around here)
FWIW, the estimates of return I use for my portfolio are 8-12%.
You will obtain information much more efficiently and accurately by reading 2 or 3 of those books rather than this haphazard mish mash of info. this thread has quickly deteriated into.
Actually, I have received plenty of helpful advice even with the supposedly inadequate information that I provided. I was not calling the helpful people snobs. Only the people who focus on trying to show how great they think they are at investing rather than offering any meaningful help.retiredjg wrote:If that is true, you need to do what people have mentioned several times.TheDev wrote:That is the whole point of me asking these questions and trying to learn more information.You have had dozens of people offering to help, but you have not provided enough information to actually get any help. This will sound harsh, but it feels to me (and apparently others) that you want other people to do all the work and you don't want to do any yourself.
- -Do some research on your own. A lot of your questions could be answered by a 5 minute internet search. And the Wiki has an incredible amount of information.
-Also, post your information so you can actually get some help that applies to your situation.
What you fail to see is how much trouble people have already go to for your benefit when there was no possibility of receiving a benefit back. Now you accuse them of being snobs? Why would a snob even bother to try to help you out? It simply doesn't make sense.You also absolutely fail to take into account....
You have also received advice that is inappropriate for your situation. Do you know which is which?TheDev wrote:Actually, I have received plenty of helpful advice even with the supposedly inadequate information that I provided.
I think you jumped to the wrong conclusion about the intent of grap0013's post. I think it is really unfortunate that you read it that way.I was not calling the helpful people snobs. Only the people who focus on trying to show how great they think they are at investing rather than offering any meaningful help.