Withdrawal Methods

From Bogleheads

When it comes time to start taking withdrawals from your retirement portfolio, there are several methods you can use, including inflation-adjusted constant-dollar withdrawals, constant-percentage withdrawals, a don't touch the principal method where you spend only the dividends, or some combination method mixing different elements of the other methods.

Constant-Dollar

Graph of constant-dollar yearly withdrawals and remaining portfolio value.

A constant-dollar withdrawal is the most commonly discussed method and the one used in the famous Trinity Study of sustainable withdrawal rates.

With this method, your initial yearly withdrawal is based on a percentage of your investment portfolio (say 4%). In subsequent years, the withdrawal is no longer based on your portfolio value, but is your initial yearly withdrawal adjusted for inflation.

The advantage of this method is that your withdrawals are predictable and constant in dollar terms, always being equal to your initial withdrawal adjusted upward for inflation. A disadvantage of this method is that if the market should undergo a prolonged downturn during the first few years of your retirement, your assets could be substantially depleted as you continue to take a larger inflation-adjusted withdrawal each year.

This method may be preferred by someone with relatively high fixed expenses who likes the predictability of a constant 'paycheck'.

Constant-Percentage

Graph of constant-percentage yearly withdrawals and remaining portfolio value.

With a constant-percentage method, you simply withdraw the same percentage annually from your current portfolio balance. Because the value of your portfolio will change based on the ups and downs of the financial markets, the dollar amount you withdraw will fluctuate from year to year.

Annual withdrawals aren't automatically increased for inflation; instead, this method counts on long-term portfolio growth to take care of adjusting for inflation.

An advantage of this method is simplicity - simply multiply your portfolio balance each year by your withdrawal percentage. And with this method your portfolio may diminish but you should never run out of money. But because your withdrawal amounts will fluctuate with your portfolio value, a disadvantage is that you'll have to spend less in periods when your portfolio value drops.

This method may be preferred by someone with lower fixed expenses who has year-to-year flexibility in spending.

Spend Only the Dividends

Graph of dividends-only yearly withdrawals and remaining portfolio value.

Retirees who wish to keep their principal investment amount intact might wish to use a method where they only spend the dividend income from their investments.

This method has the advantage of keeping your principal intact, but like the constant percentage method may result in fluctuating income amounts as the dividend rates of your investments changes. Also, while having a large bond percentage will increase your income with this method, having too little growth investments exposes you to the risk of not keeping up with inflation over the long term.

This method may be preferred by those with expenses that are small in relation to their portfolio size and those who wish to leave a large amount to heirs.

Combination Method

Graph of the alternative combination method Galeno Strategy yearly withdrawals and remaining portfolio value.

There are many alternative withdrawal methods. The following method is based on the Galeno Strategy and is intended to be representative of many of the alternative methods which are generally designed to overcome one or more disadvantages of the constant-dollar or constant-percentage withdrawal methods.

Constant-dollar

Disadvantage: Does not take into account the fluctuations of overall portfolio value. Many people would like to be able to take out a bit more during a big bull market when their portfolio value is climbing. Those same people would also likely feel uncomfortable taking an ever-increasing inflation-adjusted withdrawal during a multi-year bear market.

Alternative: Take the market value of your portfolio into account by moving a fixed percentage of your stock allocation over to your bond allocation every year.

Constant-percentage

Disadvantage: Withdrawal amount may have considerable year-to-year fluctuations.

Alternative: Smooth fluctuations by having yearly withdrawals be an average of 7½ years of bond allocation value.

Using this particular example alternative withdrawal method, 7½ years worth of withdrawals are held in bonds, the rest of the portfolio in stocks. As an example, to match up initial withdrawals and initial portfolio allocations with the graphs relating to the other methods, we will start with a $1,000,000 portfolio. The initial allocation being 70% stocks and 30% bonds. The initial yearly withdrawal being $40,000 (or 4% of initial portfolio value). The 30% in bonds would equate to $300,000 of the portfolio, which would be 7½ years worth of withdrawals, assuming $40,000 being withdrawn each year ($300,000 divided by $40,000 = 7½).

In subsequent years, 6% of the stock allocation of the remaining portfolio is sold and moved to the bond allocation. This is done each and every year, and will result in a differing amount being moved each year depending on stock market performance. This is the part of the method that is an alternative to the constant-dollar method not taking into fluctuating account value.

The 6% of the stock allocation that is sold each year is added to the bond allocation. The new yearly withdrawal amount is then figured by dividing the total bond amount by 7½. The fluctuating amount that is moved from stocks to bonds each year is smoothed by having the bond allocation contain 7½ years worth of withdrawals. As stocks go up, the bond allocation will gradually be increased and allow higher yearly withdrawals. Conversely, as stocks go down, the bond allocation will gradually be decreased and slowly result in lower yearly withdrawals. However, since there is a 7½ year buffer of withdrawals in bonds, year-to-year withdrawal amounts are smoothed and do not fluctuate greatly. This is the part of the method that is an alternative to the constant-percentage method having considerable year-to-year fluctuations of withdrawal amounts.

Overall, an alternative method is usually preferred by someone who would like to keep relatively smooth year-to-year withdrawals while also taking into account fluctuations in their overall portfolio value.

Bond Percentage Equal to Your Age

Most withdrawal method studies, including the famous Trinity Study, assumes annual rebalancing of the portfolio back to the initial stock/bond ratio. This ratio is not changed throughout the period being evaluated.

Many people prefer not to keep a static stock/bond allocation throughout their retirement, but to gradually have their portfolio become more conservative by reducing the stock allocation and increasing the bond allocation. A popular Boglehead method is to simply adjust your stock/bond allocation each year so that the bond percentage is equal to your age. This results in a 1% allocation adjustment each year.

Constant-Dollar (Age in Bonds)

Graph of constant-dollar yearly withdrawals and remaining portfolio value. Bond percentage adjusted each year to equal age.

With this method, as in the Constant-Dollar method mentioned above, your initial yearly withdrawal is based on a percentage of your investment portfolio (say 4%). In subsequent years, the withdrawal is no longer based on your portfolio value, but is your initial yearly withdrawal adjusted for inflation.

The difference in the graph here, as opposed to the one above, is that the stock/bond allocation is adjusted each year so that the bond percentage is equal to the person's age. The graph covers ages 55-90.

As in the non-age-adjusted constant-dollar method, the advantage is that your withdrawals are predictable and constant in dollar terms, always being equal to your initial withdrawal adjusted upward for inflation. The disadvantage compared to the non-age-adjusted constant-dollar method is that overall portfolio growth is significantly less as withdrawals are consistently raised each year, but the growth part of the portfolio - stocks - is decreased each year.

Constant-Percentage (Age in Bonds)

Graph of constant-percentage yearly withdrawals and remaining portfolio value. Bond percentage adjusted each year to equal age.

With this method, as in the Constant-Percentage method mentioned above, you simply withdraw the same percentage annually from your current portfolio balance. Because the value of your portfolio will change based on the ups and downs of the financial markets, the dollar amount you withdraw will fluctuate from year to year.

The difference in the graph here, as opposed to the one above, is that the stock/bond allocation is adjusted each year so that the bond percentage is equal to the person's age. The graph covers ages 55-90. And, as above, annual withdrawals aren't automatically increased for inflation; instead, this method counts on long-term portfolio growth to take care of adjusting for inflation.

Since the overall portfolio becomes more conservative each year, the growth is less than the non-age-adjusted method. However, the year-to-year portfolio withdrawal differences are also minimized due to the increased bond allocation. During down markets such as 2000-2002, which occured here when the person was older and had a larger allocation to bonds, this method significantly smoothed the year-to-year withdrawal changes compared to the non-age-adjusted method above.

See also

• Safe Withdrawal Rates
• Required Minimum Distribution

Links

• Variable Withdrawals in Retirement at Bob's Financial Website

How to Cite

You can link to this page from the Bogleheads Forum by copying and pasting the following text into your forum posting:

Please see [url=http://www.bogleheads.org/wiki/Withdrawal_Methods]Withdrawal Methods[/url] on the [url=http://www.bogleheads.org/wiki/Main_Page]Bogleheads Wiki[/url].