Rebalancing
From Bogleheads
| | Sources needed. Please help improve this article by referencing sources. Please improve this article if you can, or talk about solutions on the discussion page. |
Bogleheads Investing Start-Up Kit: Implementing an Investment Plan
- Mutual Funds and Fees
- Mutual Funds: Additional Costs
- Indexing
- Vanguard Target Retirement Funds
- Lazy Portfolios
- Principles of Tax-Efficient Fund Placement
- Rebalancing
- Tax Loss Harvesting
- Investment Policy Statement
For Introduction to Investing and Asset Classes see Bogleheads Investing Start-Up Kit.
Rebalancing is an investment tactic used to maintain a consistent mix of asset classes (most commonly equities vs. fixed income). This is accomplished by transferring funds from higher-performing classes to lower-performing classes. While potentially counterintuitive, rebalancing ensures that investors "Buy Low" and "Sell High".
Contents |
Example
- You own two funds (Fund A and Fund B)
- You have a $10,000 portfolio and each fund represents 50% of the total ($5000 each)
- Over time, Fund A rises in value to $6000 while Fund B declines in value to $4000 - you now have a 60/40 split instead of 50/50
- To maintain your asset allocation, you would rebalance your portfolio by taking $1000 from Fund A and transferring it to Fund B
- After doing so, your asset allocation is once again 50/50
Different Rebalancing Approaches
There are a variety of ways in which investors determine it is time to rebalance:
- When asset classes deviate from their target by a certain percentage. For example, if your target asset allocation is 60% equities and 40% fixed income and your rebalancing threshold is +/- 5%, you would rebalance your portfolio when your portfolio reaches 65% equities / 35% fixed income or 55% equities / 45% fixed income
- When asset classes deviate from their target by a certain dollar amount. For example, if you hold $6000 in equities and $4000 in fixed income and your rebalancing threshold is +/- $1000, you would rebalance your portfolio when either of your holdings deviates from their target asset allocation of 60% equities / 40% fixed income by at least $1000.
Other Considerations
- Transaction costs should be noted when making deciding whether or not to rebalance. Since many transactions have costs associated with them, many investors choose to wait for their portfolio to pass a significant threshold of deviation (whether defined by percentage or dollars) before rebalancing
- Many investors find it difficult "selling winners" to "buy losers". To help remove emotions from the decision, many choose a specific date to rebalance (e.g. Birthday, Tax Day, etc.). Note: Investors who find the prospect daunting may want to consider Target Retirement Funds, which automatically rebalance as necessary to maintain a consistent asset allocation.
Papers
- Portfolio Rebalancing in Theory and Practice by Vanguard Institutional Research
How to Cite
You can link to this page from the Bogleheads Forum by copying and pasting the following text into your forum posting:
Please see [url=http://www.bogleheads.org/wiki/Rebalancing]Rebalancing[/url] on the [url=http://www.bogleheads.org/wiki/Main_Page]Bogleheads Wiki[/url].
| Notice something that needs correcting? Notify a wiki editor or become a wiki editor and fix it yourself! |
|---|
| Portfolios | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sample Portfolios | Lazy Portfolios | |
| Portfolio Management | Investment Policy Statement • Rebalancing • Lump sum vs DCA • Using a Spreadsheet to Maintain a Portfolio | |
| Portfolio Withdrawals | Withdrawal Methods • Safe Withdrawal Rates | |
| Asset Classes | US Stocks • International Stocks• Real Estate • Bonds • Money Markets • Alternate Asset Classes | |

