Difference between revisions of "Lazy Portfolios"
From Bogleheads
m (→See Also) |
PiperWarrior (Talk | contribs) m (→See also) |
||
| Line 47: | Line 47: | ||
==See also== | ==See also== | ||
| − | [[More Lazy Portfolios |More Lazy Portfolios]] | + | * [[More Lazy Portfolios |More Lazy Portfolios]] |
| − | + | * [[Core Four Portfolio | Core Four Portfolio]] | |
| − | [[Core Four Portfolio | Core Four Portfolio]] | + | * [[Investment Policy Statement]] |
| − | + | ||
| − | [[Investment Policy Statement]] | + | |
[[Category:Portfolios]] | [[Category:Portfolios]] | ||
Revision as of 14:57, 30 August 2008
Lazy portfolios are designed to perform well in most market conditions. Most contain a small number of low-cost funds that are easy to rebalance. They are "lazy" in that the investor can maintain the same asset allocation for an extended period of time, as they generally contain 30-40% bonds, suitable for most pre-retirement investors.
There are a number of popular authors and columnists who have suggested 3 fund lazy portfolios. These typically consist of three equal parts of bonds (total bond market or TIPS), total US market and total international market.
|
|
