 |
Bogleheads Investing Advice Inspired by Jack Bogle
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
bigH
Joined: 19 Mar 2008 Posts: 564
|
Posted: Sat Nov 07, 2009 4:55 pm Post subject: Do major home improvements make sense as good investments? |
|
|
Bogleheads when you make a major home improvement do you see it as a sunk purchase, investment, zero sum expense or a little bit of the three?
Some people I know see home improvement as an investment (if done correctly of course). Their argument is that if I pay contractor X today for an upgrade, that upgrade in 5 years may cost more due to rising labor expenses (i.e. inflation). The upgrade may even create more value than the expense (like an investment)
Others see it as a zero sum expense that pays itself by a higher sale price but does not add extra value.
What has been your experiences? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mfen
Joined: 21 Jun 2009 Posts: 394
|
Posted: Sat Nov 07, 2009 5:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I find energy efficiency upgrades including mechanical systems (appliances, ac, furnace, etc...) payout pretty quickly and are good investments. The return comes from reduced utility costs over time. This idea could be stretched to landscaping. As far as landscaping it could be considered an appreciating asset whereas everything else depreciates.
Windows and door upgrades can be good energy efficient upgrades but not always. Condition would be a major factor. If they are in really in bad condition then upgrade, but I would not go from good condition windows to thermals and consider it an "investment".
The rest are a matter of style, personal comfort, security and maintenance. _________________ Maryanne |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
catchup
Joined: 20 Apr 2008 Posts: 130
|
Posted: Sat Nov 07, 2009 5:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Our real estate agent sent out something a couple of years ago which seemed to indicate that the value of the home rose by a large fraction, but not the entire amount of the money invested in major home improvements. My general memory/impression of the data. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
zaga21
Joined: 27 Sep 2009 Posts: 5
|
Posted: Sat Nov 07, 2009 6:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
We upgrade things that we want to live with. Recently that's been a new roof (that is all one color with no patches), new windows instead of the 50 year old single pane ones, paint in a few rooms, and trees outside. I guess a house to me isn't an asset but a place to live in and enjoy. _________________ Zaga |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
BruceM

Joined: 08 Aug 2008 Posts: 618 Location: Manzanita, Oregon
|
Posted: Sat Nov 07, 2009 8:16 pm Post subject: Re: Do major home improvements make sense as good investment |
|
|
| bigH wrote: | Bogleheads when you make a major home improvement do you see it as a sunk purchase, investment, zero sum expense or a little bit of the three?
Some people I know see home improvement as an investment (if done correctly of course). Their argument is that if I pay contractor X today for an upgrade, that upgrade in 5 years may cost more due to rising labor expenses (i.e. inflation). The upgrade may even create more value than the expense (like an investment)
Others see it as a zero sum expense that pays itself by a higher sale price but does not add extra value.
What has been your experiences? |
There are three potential financial benefits to you the homeowner:
1. Energy savings over the period you live there
2. Potential tax credits of up to 30% of certain energy savings, but not greater than $1,500 lifetime credit
3. Increased home value
You need to compare this with the cost of the upgrade plus the opportunity cost of what you would have earned on the $$ you spent on the energy upgrades.
Is it financially worth it?
You'll need to make your own calculations based on your own estimates and assumptions, as every situation is different.
BruceM |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mhalley
Joined: 20 Nov 2007 Posts: 173
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
expat
Joined: 10 Mar 2008 Posts: 147
|
Posted: Sun Nov 08, 2009 1:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Home improvement presents a dangerous opportunity to overspend on yourself. It's definitely not an investment, IMO. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Qtman

Joined: 29 Jun 2008 Posts: 109 Location: Kent Island, MD
|
Posted: Sun Nov 08, 2009 6:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
We are almost finished with an major renovation, is it a wise investment?
Happy wife, happy life.
So yes, it is wise for me. _________________ Don’t wear yourself out trying to get rich; be wise enough to control yourself.
Wealth can vanish in the wink of an eye. It can seem to grow wings and fly away
like an eagle. Proverbs 23:4-5 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Babakhani

Joined: 05 Jul 2009 Posts: 47 Location: Tampa, FL
|
Posted: Sun Nov 08, 2009 11:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Qtman wrote: | We are almost finished with an major renovation, is it a wise investment?
Happy wife, happy life.
So yes, it is wise for me. |
Couldn't have said it better. Your own happiness is worth investing in. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jebmke
Joined: 05 Apr 2007 Posts: 397
|
Posted: Sun Nov 08, 2009 12:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| expat wrote: | | Home improvement presents a dangerous opportunity to overspend on yourself. It's definitely not an investment, IMO. |
I think this is true for home purchase in general. I consider my home and subsequent improvements "consumption." The only reason I keep track of the asset value is for tax and insurance purposes. _________________ When you discover that you are riding a dead horse, the best strategy is to dismount. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
LadyGeek

Joined: 20 Dec 2008 Posts: 820 Location: Philly suburb
|
Posted: Sun Nov 08, 2009 2:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I did a major renovation to avoid moving. A nice property in an old neighborhood. The only constraint was the size of the house.
Unless you are investing in the property, and not living in it, then you should look at costs as a primary factor. Otherwise, it's a happiness of lifestyle choice, which is why you make investments in the first place. _________________ Some say the glass half-full. Others say the glass is half-empty. To an engineer, it’s twice as big as it needs to be. Link to Wiki |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bigH
Joined: 19 Mar 2008 Posts: 564
|
Posted: Sun Nov 08, 2009 2:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Great article. Thanks for sharing. My dad seems to think spending money on a home is not bad and at worst a zero sum game. However, I these numbers speak for themselves. It appears at worst 50% of the expense is really consumption while the rest you get back at the sale of the house. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
stratton

Joined: 04 Mar 2007 Posts: 6216 Location: Puget Sound
|
Posted: Sun Nov 08, 2009 4:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
If you're planning on living there for the next 10+ years then you get usage out of the upgrades.
There is also the "necessary" upgrades. She updated the bathroom with a simple vanity and new toilet and shower surround. But the kitchen is still the orignal 1947 one with the faucet coming out of the wall and cabinets. Even the cheapest cabinets and counters from Home Depot would improve the value. I'd guess a she'd take a $20K or $30K hit on a sale, for a $250K house, if no kitchen upgrades were made.
Paul |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
neverknow
Joined: 05 Jun 2009 Posts: 718
|
Posted: Sun Nov 08, 2009 8:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| bigH wrote: |
Great article. Thanks for sharing. My dad seems to think spending money on a home is not bad and at worst a zero sum game. However, I these numbers speak for themselves. It appears at worst 50% of the expense is really consumption while the rest you get back at the sale of the house. |
If you ignore the bubble of this decade - the rule of thumb is that 50% you refer to do, but I think it depends.
Remodel a 1930's bathroom into something a bit more modern - versus remodel a 1980's bathroom into fashionable fixtures. There is a huge difference in "improvement" here.
I have owned and lived in my own home (though several of them) for 30 years now. You don't invest in your home - that is what is known as a "money sink" (as it will absorb all the money you pour into it).
I have replaced furnaces, water heaters, windows - even rewired (had to, the wiring was so old it had no ground, couldn't take a 3 prong computer plug).
I will probably be replacing the water heater - doing whatever has to be done to control the mineral buildup coming from the minerals in my well water - and replacing the dishwasher -- again. It is that again part for the dishwasher, that is prompting the other bits. Apparently a dishwasher can only last 3 years with all the minerals from our water source (even with periodic cleaning out of the minerals). All that so I don't have to wash dishes by hand - sheesh! I don't expect any return on the investment, other then hopefully the absence of an annoying dishwasher that constantly needs replacing. The home is 1960's vintage, but has often been a rental, so I guess no one cared. We also brought the well head up to code - and while we were at it, replaced the rusted out pipe to the house --- another thing, I don't expect any return on. This is routine maintenance on a home.
Listen to your Dad, he is right. This decade and perhaps even part of the 90's have been an aberration.
neverknow |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
epilnk
Joined: 18 Apr 2007 Posts: 482
|
Posted: Sun Nov 08, 2009 8:57 pm Post subject: Re: Do major home improvements make sense as good investment |
|
|
The sensible/conservative approach is to consider it consumption. That way you don't get too carried away with rationalizing the expenses away. And in most cases that is probably closest to the truth anyway.
Individual cases will vary of course - the "average" probably isn't relevant when you are addressing a specific problem, especially if it's one that would be visible to buyers. In our case, we just completed a modest renovation of a dreadful tiny kitchen and the result was a very pleasant space with effectively double the work area. We considered it consumption because we did it for our benefit - the kitchen was difficult to live with - but it is clear that the upgrade has a disproportionate impact on the house value because it fixed a major blot on an otherwise nice house. So in retrospect it was also investment. But had we felt the need to install high end fixtures, the higher cost would have represented consumption.
Linda |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
patriciamgr2
Joined: 19 Nov 2007 Posts: 67
|
Posted: Sun Nov 08, 2009 10:13 pm Post subject: Most of the time, it's consumption |
|
|
I agree with earlier posts. I invested in real estate for several years. Two types of improvements pay off for resale: (1) category changers, and (2) "fluffing" done immediately before the sale. Examples of #1 are adding a master suite to a 2BR, 1BA home; examples of #2 are repainting in neutral colors, freshening up landscaping, deep cleaning carpets & maybe, refacing (not replacing) truly awful kitchen cabinets.
Most improvements will either be too taste specific or too dated to really improve your resale value. (I'm old enough to remember avocado green fixtures as the height of fashion; I'm proud to say I never indulged! )
If you measure costs spent on an improvement as offsetting money you would otherwise absolutely spend (e.g. purchase price of efficient appliances offset by electric bill savings)--those "efficiency" expenditures may pay off. Buyers won't really give you credit for them, however.
In the past when prices of real estate rose each year, homeowners attributed appreciation to their improvements when, in fact, a large percentage of the increase in price was due to general appreciation which would have accrued whether or not the improvement was completed.
In the final analysis, if the homeowner can afford to spend the money purely as consumption--do what makes you happy. Do not EVER consider it as an investment unless you're willing to have an appraisal done before and after the job. My experience is that very few projects will result in a gain at all, much less a satisfactory investment return.
Good Luck |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
neverknow
Joined: 05 Jun 2009 Posts: 718
|
Posted: Mon Nov 09, 2009 7:22 am Post subject: Re: Most of the time, it's consumption |
|
|
| patriciamgr2 wrote: | I agree with earlier posts. I invested in real estate for several years. Two types of improvements pay off for resale: (1) category changers, and (2) "fluffing" done immediately before the sale. Examples of #1 are adding a master suite to a 2BR, 1BA home; examples of #2 are repainting in neutral colors, freshening up landscaping, deep cleaning carpets & maybe, refacing (not replacing) truly awful kitchen cabinets.
Most improvements will either be too taste specific or too dated to really improve your resale value. (I'm old enough to remember avocado green fixtures as the height of fashion; I'm proud to say I never indulged! )
If you measure costs spent on an improvement as offsetting money you would otherwise absolutely spend (e.g. purchase price of efficient appliances offset by electric bill savings)--those "efficiency" expenditures may pay off. Buyers won't really give you credit for them, however.
In the past when prices of real estate rose each year, homeowners attributed appreciation to their improvements when, in fact, a large percentage of the increase in price was due to general appreciation which would have accrued whether or not the improvement was completed.
In the final analysis, if the homeowner can afford to spend the money purely as consumption--do what makes you happy. Do not EVER consider it as an investment unless you're willing to have an appraisal done before and after the job. My experience is that very few projects will result in a gain at all, much less a satisfactory investment return.
Good Luck |
You really said this well, and concise.
It seems to me, you always have to do the #2 bit to sell a place ... I've always bug bombed, and had carpets cleaned. Even rental apartments do this for the next occupants.
I have engaged in the #1 bit, but it's objective was because that was the home I wanted to live in - and I could afford too (not engaged in on credit, but in cash). The place I sold winter of 2006/2007 I was shocked - literally shocked, to get dollar for dollar back, plus some. This home, bought summer of 2006, the seller kept trying to hype garbage they had upgraded (carpets, lighting fixtures, kitchen cabinets - including showing receipts) and personally - I completely ignored them. I am a cash buyer - there is no appraisal other then what I am willing to pay and I could have cared less, about what they seemed to care so much about. I cared #1 that the lot was level (one acre in mountainous terrain) and #2, that the lot had direct highway access, thus direct north and south forest fire escape routes (as well as it was not a winter snow nightmare that a private road would be), and #3 that the lot was not in a mountain shadow (which causes the sun to set on you at 3 in the afternoon in the winter). There you go - the primary rule in real estate always --- location, location, location. The house? I didn't really see the house till after bought it. I did rely on my husband (a professional handyman) to check out the condition of the home, which was apparently adequate. So all I was really going on other then location, was the space was adequate, and laid out in a sensible fashion.
Location, location, location.
Most dollars spent on a home are either routine maintenance or for your personal enjoyment. Recent history has been an aberration.
neverknow |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ilovevolleyball

Joined: 11 Jan 2008 Posts: 261
|
Posted: Mon Nov 16, 2009 1:38 am Post subject: Re: Do major home improvements make sense as good investment |
|
|
| BruceM wrote: | | bigH wrote: | Bogleheads when you make a major home improvement do you see it as a sunk purchase, investment, zero sum expense or a little bit of the three?
Some people I know see home improvement as an investment (if done correctly of course). Their argument is that if I pay contractor X today for an upgrade, that upgrade in 5 years may cost more due to rising labor expenses (i.e. inflation). The upgrade may even create more value than the expense (like an investment)
Others see it as a zero sum expense that pays itself by a higher sale price but does not add extra value.
What has been your experiences? |
There are three potential financial benefits to you the homeowner:
1. Energy savings over the period you live there
2. Potential tax credits of up to 30% of certain energy savings, but not greater than $1,500 lifetime credit
3. Increased home value
You need to compare this with the cost of the upgrade plus the opportunity cost of what you would have earned on the $$ you spent on the energy upgrades.
Is it financially worth it?
You'll need to make your own calculations based on your own estimates and assumptions, as every situation is different.
BruceM |
There are exceptions to that 1500 credit.
I had 2Khw Solar Photovoltaic Installed. 14k Cost but after tax credits net cost should be less than 1k.
This should produce 180$ a year. I think that putting a dollar amount on value to buyer is tough, like a nice kitchen is nice but... what dollar amount. I am doing green upgrades when cost is not too much more with the idea of resale...
Mike |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|