 |
Bogleheads Investing Advice Inspired by Jack Bogle
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
tgduffy
Joined: 27 Jun 2008 Posts: 29 Location: Cameron Park, California
|
Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 6:52 pm Post subject: Where to park emergency funds |
|
|
| I have about $30,000 which is considered our liquid emergency funds. While keeping them liquid I am trying to pinch out a little extra yield. I recently opened up a 1.85% savings account with American Express, but they just drpped the rate to 1.70% so I pulled it out. I noticed Vanguards Short Term Fed Fund VSGBX is yielding higher than the typical money market accounts but doesn't seem too volitale. Is this a good place to drop liquid assets? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
KyleAAA
Joined: 01 Jul 2009 Posts: 346
|
Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 6:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'd have left it in the savings account. 1.7% is really good concerning the alternatives. Mine is currently parked at ING earning 1.3%.
The short-term bond fund wouldn't be the worst thing in the world you could park your emergency fund in, but why bother? You'd only make another $400 or so per year but you'd be taking on a non-trivial amount of risk to do so. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Chuck T
Joined: 03 Sep 2008 Posts: 452 Location: Lowcountry of South Carolina
|
Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 7:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
tgduffy
First, welcome to the forum. If the $30k is emergency funds that must remain liquid, they should be placed in a MM or FDIC insured bank account or CD's. The bond fund you mentioned is a good one, but can still go down in value. Is it worth the risk for the extra yield.? Only you can answer that question. Good luck. _________________ PM Chuck T to join SC LowCountry & Savannah GA Area Diehards Local Chapter 38 or email me at chucktanner46@gmail.com. Thanks |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
tgduffy
Joined: 27 Jun 2008 Posts: 29 Location: Cameron Park, California
|
Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 7:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Thanks Kyle for your input. I was comparing the 1.7% at AmEx with the fund's 1, 3 5, and 10 year yield and figured with virtually no risk I was doubling my return. Am I missing something here? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nisiprius

Joined: 26 Jul 2007 Posts: 6999 Location: North America; Western Hemisphere; the Earth; the Solar System; the Universe; the Mind of God
|
Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 7:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
"I noticed Vanguards Short Term Fed Fund VSGBX is yielding higher than the typical money market accounts but doesn't seem too volatile." Yes, but this was always true, so why didn't you have your money there before?
How volatile is "not too volatile?" I see a place on their "growth of $10,000" chart in mid-2007 where there's a little blip.
If you'd put $10,000 into this fund in 1999, at that point in mid-2007 you'd have seen $15,534.67. One month later $15,440.01. One month later, $15,360.56. Compared to a stock fund that's not much, but if I saw one of my bank savings accounts lose $94.66 in one month and then $79.45 the next month, I'd be pretty upset.
That means that the fund lost over 1.1% in just two months. Or to put it another way, that fund can lose in just two months almost as much as your money market fund makes in a year.
I don't want to overstate this. I'm just asking, when you say it is "not too volatile," is that what you mean by "not too volatile?"
Even though it's just a small amount, there's a big difference between the kind of account that never loses money (bank accounts, money market accounts, savings bonds) and the kind of account that sometimes does. _________________ Annual income twenty pounds, annual expenditure nineteen nineteen and six, result happiness; Annual income twenty pounds, annual expenditure twenty pounds ought and six, result misery. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
tgduffy
Joined: 27 Jun 2008 Posts: 29 Location: Cameron Park, California
|
Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 7:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I guess my "not too volitale" referred to minimal loss in the short term. Even though this is my emergency fund, i am making the assumption that I could wait 3 to 6 months to draw from it if I had too as I have access to other funds for 'real' emergencues (a very generous mother-in-law that wouldn't need to be paid back for awhile. Maybe I should simplify my question = Where should I park 6 months worth of funds for short term needs, AmEx at 1.7% or the short term fund currently at a 7% last 12 months yield? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DaveTH

Joined: 05 Apr 2007 Posts: 2339
|
Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 7:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | ...or the short term fund currently at a 7% last 12 months yield? |
You are comparing apples and oranges. The ST bond fund you mentioned has a yield of 1.42%. You would have been better off leaving your money in the FDIC-insured Amex account paying 1.70%. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
tgduffy
Joined: 27 Jun 2008 Posts: 29 Location: Cameron Park, California
|
Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 7:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Ouch, maybe I'm really mixed up. The fund I am referring to is the Short Term Fed Fund fund (VSGBX) and Vanguard's data says it has yielded 3.04% ytd, 7.11% for 1 year, and 4.64% for 5 years. What am I missing here? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
LadyGeek

Joined: 20 Dec 2008 Posts: 822 Location: Philly suburb
|
Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 10:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
There's a not too subtle point here. Emergency funds have to balance need vs. yield. IOW, the whole reason they're called emergency funds is because you need things in a hurry.
For example, your sewer line unexpectedly blocks up and you need $300 to clean it (emergency service), followed by $2,500 to excavate and replace a broken line (trap) a few days later. (That was my excitement last week, the joys of home ownership...)
Here's how I do it. With 6 - 8 months designated as "emergency funds":
10% is available for immediate access. For example, a local bank savings account that can be tapped with an ATM card.
40% is available with a 2-3 day delay. This is for those high-yield savings accounts that are better than your local bank. ING, for example.
50% is available in the next few months or longer. For those things that you can plan for in advance, like home improvement or a new car. In a true emergency, you can at least get to the funds (but maybe a small penalty). CDs work here, especially laddering. You can time maturity dates so something comes due every few months or so.
Search the forum for "emergency fund" and you can find a few more threads on the topic.
http://www.bogleheads.org/foru....b9fa4fc392 _________________ Some say the glass half-full. Others say the glass is half-empty. To an engineer, it’s twice as big as it needs to be. Link to Wiki |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Eureka
Joined: 05 Apr 2007 Posts: 584 Location: Illinois
|
Posted: Wed Nov 04, 2009 2:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
| tgduffy wrote: | | Ouch, maybe I'm really mixed up. The fund I am referring to is the Short Term Fed Fund fund (VSGBX) and Vanguard's data says it has yielded 3.04% ytd, 7.11% for 1 year, and 4.64% for 5 years. What am I missing here? |
I think you may be looking at total return rather than yield. The total return of a bond fund is composed of two elements: yield and net asset value appreciation or depreciation.
Many quality bond funds have had a good year as investors have poured more money into bonds than stocks and interest rates have fallen. Much of that total return for one year in the Short Term Federal is net asset value appreciation. As NAVs have increased, yields have declined.
If interest rates rise, bond fund NAVs will decline and yields will rise. To determine this interest rate risk, check the fund's duration. In the case of this fund, it's currently 1.8 years. That means if interest rates of bonds of similar maturity increase by 1 percent, the NAV of this fund will fall by about 1.8 percent.
1.8 years is a relatively short duration, so the risk is smaller than, say, in the Long Term Bond Index Fund, which has a duration of 12.3 years. Most bond funds you'll find will have durations somewhere between these extremes. Keep in mind that the durations of funds are always changing, because the funds are constantly buying and selling bonds of varying durations.
Check out the price action of the fund here: http://www.google.com/finance?....MUTF:VSGBX You can see what it's done for the last month or up to 10 years.
Don't feel bad. Bond funds are not easy to understand. I'm still trying.
Last edited by Eureka on Wed Nov 04, 2009 3:03 am; edited 2 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
LongDistanceRunner

Joined: 25 Sep 2009 Posts: 47
|
Posted: Wed Nov 04, 2009 10:43 am Post subject: Re: Where to park emergency funds |
|
|
| tgduffy wrote: | | I have about $30,000 which is considered our liquid emergency funds. While keeping them liquid I am trying to pinch out a little extra yield. |
TGDuffy,
Since you are married, I would recommend purchasing $20,000 worth of I-bonds in denominations of $1000 ($10K for you and $10K for your spouse) just before the end of November (I-Bonds purchased on Nov 27 will earn interest from the 1st of Nov). Note that each of you can purchase $5k at your bank (on paper) and $5K using a Treasury Direct account. The current I-Bond has a composite rate of 3.36% for the next 6 months. There is a 3 month penalty for cashing them in before holding them for 5 years. If you must cash them and incur this penalty, the first year's yield might be around 2.75 % (more or less) depending on the new rate for I-Bonds to be established next May. There is also a 12 month minimum holding period, but if you can get by in an emergency with the other $10,000 for the year, then this should not be a problem after 1 year. Once past the first year, you could cash only the amount on I-Bonds that you need in increments of $1000. If you wish, you could also redeem part of an I-Bond for the exact amount you need. Remember that I-Bonds can never go down in value, so they are essentially risk free.
If you did not wish to risk the minimum holding period, you could delay purchase of part of these bonds for up to 6 months.
Six months after the initial purchase, if you still have the other $10K in a short term account, I would purchase an additional $10K of I-Bonds, if the new rate were comparable to the current composite rate.
For more details about I-Bonds go to:
http://www.treasurydirect.gov/....dterms.htm
LDR _________________ "Work like you don't need the money.
Love like you've never been hurt.
Dance like nobody's watching." - Satchel Paige |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
natureexplorer
Joined: 03 Sep 2009 Posts: 106
|
Posted: Wed Nov 04, 2009 11:23 am Post subject: Re: Where to park emergency funds |
|
|
| LongDistanceRunner wrote: | | I would recommend purchasing $20,000 worth of I-bonds in denominations of $1000 |
Why in denominations of $1,000? I thought one can make partial redemptions of I Bonds.
Aside from that, for someone with $30,000 in emergency funds, I think splitting it into 6 pieces of $5,000 each should be sufficient. Simplicity trumps in my opinion.
Anyway, it's already annoying enough that the paper and electronic I Bonds have independet contributions limits. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DartThrower
Joined: 11 Mar 2009 Posts: 306 Location: Philadelphia
|
Posted: Wed Nov 04, 2009 11:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
I don't have a generous mother-in-law at the moment so I use Sheila Bair as a surrogate. She has a kindly face and she keeps my emergency money safe. Besides I hear she cooks a mean turkey at Thanksgiving. (Still waiting for the invitation though. ) _________________ "Fallacies do not cease to be fallacies because they become fashions."
-G. K. Chesterton |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
LongDistanceRunner

Joined: 25 Sep 2009 Posts: 47
|
Posted: Wed Nov 04, 2009 4:19 pm Post subject: Re: Where to park emergency funds |
|
|
| natureexplorer wrote: | | LongDistanceRunner wrote: | | I would recommend purchasing $20,000 worth of I-bonds in denominations of $1000 |
Why in denominations of $1,000? I thought one can make partial redemptions of I Bonds.
|
natureexplorer:
Yes, partial redemptions of I-Bonds can be made on Treasury Direct. But partial redemption of paper I-Bonds seems to be more complicated. That's why I recommended $1000 denominations (I meant this more for the ease of redeeming paper bonds).
LDR _________________ "Work like you don't need the money.
Love like you've never been hurt.
Dance like nobody's watching." - Satchel Paige |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
KyleAAA
Joined: 01 Jul 2009 Posts: 346
|
Posted: Wed Nov 04, 2009 5:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| tgduffy wrote: | | Thanks Kyle for your input. I was comparing the 1.7% at AmEx with the fund's 1, 3 5, and 10 year yield and figured with virtually no risk I was doubling my return. Am I missing something here? |
That's just it, it's not "virtually no risk." The risk is significant. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|