 |
Bogleheads Investing Advice Inspired by Jack Bogle
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
grok87
Joined: 27 Feb 2007 Posts: 3371
|
Posted: Thu Oct 08, 2009 9:51 pm Post subject: CD strategy article |
|
|
http://www.financialsamurai.co....cr=800x600
Interesting article. He argues that one should always buy the CD with the highest yield even if it is long maturity. I hasten to add that he is not talking about brokerage cds which are often callable, but the regular bank/credit union cds. For those ones you can generally get your money out early and just lose 6 months or a years interest. I think the point is something like this:
Say you buy a 7 year CD yielding 4% now. (pen fed has one). If rates go up 3% then if that were are a marketable CD or treasury then the market value would have gone down by 18% (duration of about 6 years * 3% rate increase) so getting out by losing 4% interest (one year say) is cheap and you would then get to lock in 7% going forward. If rates drop 2% then you've locked in a great rate for a longer period.
cheers, _________________ grok, CFA |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
eurowizard
Joined: 10 May 2008 Posts: 1005
|
Posted: Thu Oct 08, 2009 10:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Isnt this already priced into CD yields? Banks know they are at risk of being callable for 1 year penalty and thus consequently offer a reduced yield on the CDs they issue. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nisiprius

Joined: 26 Jul 2007 Posts: 9264 Location: North America; Western Hemisphere; the Earth; the Solar System; the Universe; the Mind of God
|
Posted: Fri Oct 09, 2009 12:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | The worst “penalty” that can happen for a 5-year CD is the forefeiture of 6 months worth of interest. | It ain't necessarily so. This is an important issue and it bothers me that he fails to discuss at all.
The terms and conditions of CDs vary in important ways. Some CDs can only be redeemed before maturity at the discretion of the bank. I know this to be true because I'm an inveterate fine-print reader, and dm200 who actually knows stuff has confirmed it. You must, must, must read the fine print before you buy the CD.
If you intend to buy a longish-term CD and just redeem it if rates go up, you should ask probing questions and make sure this is possible. Unfortunately this is an area which customer reps aren't trained to discuss. And my experience is that it is a topic about which banks and state bank officials purely hate hypothetical questions.
The banks aren't fools; if rates go up there will be a lot of folks wanting to redeem CDs. That would be exactly the time when banks that were counting on paying you low 2009 interest rates might play hardball if they possibly can.
Why do the terms and conditions vary? Maybe in this entrepreneurial paradise they can just set whatever conditions they like; maybe the constraints that are placed upon them have to do with state regulations, or how their chartered, or what kind of "bank" they are... beats me. _________________ Annual income twenty pounds, annual expenditure nineteen nineteen and six, result happiness; Annual income twenty pounds, annual expenditure twenty pounds ought and six, result misery. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Taylor Larimore Moderator

Joined: 27 Feb 2007 Posts: 9539 Location: Miami Florida
|
Posted: Fri Oct 09, 2009 12:53 pm Post subject: Read the fine print |
|
|
| Quote: | | You must, must, must read the fine print before you buy the CD. |
Nisiprius is correct. I recently considered buying a 5-year PenFed CD with the idea that I could accept a small penalty and sell it if interest rates go up.
Nowhere on the FenFed website could I find the exact penalty. Eventually, after a telephone call and lot of searching I discovered the penalty is stated in the application and is 1 year loss of interest if the CD is sold before 5-years.
Result: I gave up and exchanged the extra cash in our taxable Vanguard money market fund for shares of Limited-Term Tax-Exempt Bond Fund. _________________ Best wishes
Taylor
The Majesty of Simplicity |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
HueyLD

Joined: 14 Jan 2008 Posts: 1778
|
Posted: Fri Oct 09, 2009 1:21 pm Post subject: Re: Read the fine print |
|
|
| Taylor Larimore wrote: | Nowhere on the FenFed website could I find the exact penalty. Eventually, after a telephone call and lot of searching I discovered the penalty is stated in the application and is 1 year loss of interest if the CD is sold before 5-years.
Result: I gave up and exchanged the extra cash in our taxable Vanguard money market fund for shares of Limited-Term Tax-Exempt Bond Fund. |
Hi Taylor,
The early w/d penalty is clearly stated on the back of the "Share Certificate Agreement" (a/k/a/ form 686). Here it is.
(1) 6-Month Certificates:
(a) if redeemed within 90 days of the issue date, all div will be forfeited.
(b) if redeemed thereafter but prior to the maturity, div for 90 days will be forfeited.
(2) Certificates having a term greater than 6 months up to and including 5 years:
(a) if redeemed within 180 days of the issue date, all div will be forfeited.
(b) if redeemed thereafter but prior to the maturity, div for the most recent 180 days will be forfeited.
(3) Certificates having a term of 7 years:
(a) if redeemed within 365 days of the issue date, all div will be forfeited.
(b) if redeemed thereafter but prior to the maturity, div for the most recent 365 days will be forfeited.
I actually built a spreadsheet showing the XIRR of PenFed's various CD terms by incorporating the early w/d penalty into the mix. It is very interesting. As grok says, you get better yields by buying a 7-year CD and withdraw the money early in most instances. My spreadsheet shows one can get better yields by buying a 7-year CD and break it after about 2 years.
Edited to add the early w/d condition for 6-mo CDs.
Last edited by HueyLD on Fri Oct 09, 2009 2:37 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
fluffyistaken

Joined: 04 Apr 2008 Posts: 1056
|
Posted: Fri Oct 09, 2009 1:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| True about the fine print but, as the OP stated, penalty of one year of interest is still a great deal on a 7-yr CD at 4% compared to an equivalent treasury. Here's PenFed's CD info, including early withdrawal penalties: https://www.penfed.org/pdf/acc....mcdisc.pdf |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
fluffyistaken

Joined: 04 Apr 2008 Posts: 1056
|
Posted: Fri Oct 09, 2009 1:46 pm Post subject: Re: Read the fine print |
|
|
| HueyLD wrote: |
I actually built a spreadsheet showing the XIRR of PenFed's various CD terms by incorporating the early w/d penalty into the mix. It is very interesting. As grok says, you get better yields by buying a 7-year CD and withdraw the money early in most instances. My spreadsheet shows one can get better yields by buying a 7-year CD and break it after about 2 years. |
Would you mind posting it for a download?
The cheap CD early withdrawal option makes higher yields a nearly free lunch in most scenarios I can think of. At least up to the $250,000 insurance limit. Would be neat to play with the Excel. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rb313
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 125 Location: VA
|
Posted: Fri Oct 09, 2009 1:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Unless there is a premium for jumbo, you'd probably want to couple this with buying multiple smaller units rather than one big one, allowing you to take 'some' cash out if you needed to. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nisiprius

Joined: 26 Jul 2007 Posts: 9264 Location: North America; Western Hemisphere; the Earth; the Solar System; the Universe; the Mind of God
|
Posted: Fri Oct 09, 2009 2:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| HueyLD wrote: | | The early w/d penalty is clearly stated on the back of the "Share Certificate Agreement" (a/k/a/ form 686). | Since you have the form handy... what, exactly, does the form say on the topic of whether you have the right to redeem before maturity?
For example, does it say, explicitly, that you have the right to redeem the certificate before maturity?
Does it say that Penfed allows you to do this at their discretion?
Or does it just leave the question open? _________________ Annual income twenty pounds, annual expenditure nineteen nineteen and six, result happiness; Annual income twenty pounds, annual expenditure twenty pounds ought and six, result misery. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
HueyLD

Joined: 14 Jan 2008 Posts: 1778
|
Posted: Fri Oct 09, 2009 2:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| nisiprius wrote: | Since you have the form handy... what, exactly, does the form say on the topic of whether you have the right to redeem before maturity?
For example, does it say, explicitly, that you have the right to redeem the certificate before maturity?
Does it say that Penfed allows you to do this at their discretion?
Or does it just leave the question open? |
O.k. Here it is.
6-month Certificates
(1) No withdrawal shall be permitted during the first 7 calendar days.
Certificates having a term greater than 6 months:
(1) Maturity of less than 18 months: no withdrawal shall be permitted during the first 7 calendar days.
(2) otherwise, no withdrawal shall be permitted during the first 30 calendar days. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
OAG

Joined: 03 Mar 2007 Posts: 315 Location: Currently Central Ohio, USA
|
Posted: Fri Oct 09, 2009 3:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Duplicate Post. _________________ OAG=Old Army Guy. Retired from USA (US Army) in 1979.
Last edited by OAG on Fri Oct 09, 2009 4:45 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
OAG

Joined: 03 Mar 2007 Posts: 315 Location: Currently Central Ohio, USA
|
Posted: Fri Oct 09, 2009 3:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I have been using FDIC/NCUA Insured CD's for over 30 years (mostly at Pentagon FCU and Capital One Bank, but also at Navy FCU an another Florida CU). I have always purchased the longest terms with the best rates - as long as 10 year terms (Capital One) but mostly 7 Year Terms. I NEVER cash out early. The average IR for the past 30 years has been 5.7%, or more. Currently we own about 45 CD's maturing over the next 6 years @ 5.74% (CD Ladder). I have not purchased any for the past year as I had another use for the excess cash. One nice benefit, which all of the above institutions offer, is the ability to take the accrued interest as cash if you need it, either on a current or past basis. So this allows for a much smaller "emergency fund". _________________ OAG=Old Army Guy. Retired from USA (US Army) in 1979. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dm200

Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 3127 Location: Washington DC area Born 1946
|
Posted: Fri Oct 09, 2009 3:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| For various reasons, the various combinations of rates, compounding frequency, penalties, ability to withdraw early or not, availability of posted interest, etc. - the CD market (especially those issued directly and not brokered - is not "efficient" in the sense that some banks and credit unions offer some really good deals and others offer terrible deals. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
knowmad
Joined: 06 Feb 2009 Posts: 417
|
Posted: Fri Oct 09, 2009 5:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I find that CDs over 3 years are almost always a bad choice compared to short to medium term bond funds. Under 3 years they are a great safety net. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
grok87
Joined: 27 Feb 2007 Posts: 3371
|
Posted: Fri Oct 09, 2009 11:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| knowmad wrote: | | I find that CDs over 3 years are almost always a bad choice compared to short to medium term bond funds. Under 3 years they are a great safety net. |
ok...
can you give us an example please?
cheers, _________________ grok, CFA |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
grok87
Joined: 27 Feb 2007 Posts: 3371
|
Posted: Fri Oct 09, 2009 11:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| dm200 wrote: | | For various reasons, the various combinations of rates, compounding frequency, penalties, ability to withdraw early or not, availability of posted interest, etc. - the CD market (especially those issued directly and not brokered - is not "efficient" in the sense that some banks and credit unions offer some really good deals and others offer terrible deals. |
+1 _________________ grok, CFA |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
grok87
Joined: 27 Feb 2007 Posts: 3371
|
Posted: Fri Oct 09, 2009 11:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| fluffyistaken wrote: | | True about the fine print but, as the OP stated, penalty of one year of interest is still a great deal on a 7-yr CD at 4% compared to an equivalent treasury. Here's PenFed's CD info, including early withdrawal penalties: https://www.penfed.org/pdf/acc....mcdisc.pdf |
Yep.
And of course if the jump in interest rates happens *during* your first year afterf the long CD purchase, you only lose the partial year's interest.
cheers, _________________ grok, CFA |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bmb
Joined: 06 May 2009 Posts: 637
|
Posted: Fri Oct 09, 2009 11:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Talk about a backwards strategy! It's like buying only stocks that are overvalued.
If anything, you should lengthen the maturity when rates are historically high. For example, in the 1970s yields were over 15%. A 30 year bond would have been a nice investment. US inflation seldom persists for long, but deflation can hang around for decades.
Better yet, don't pretend you can predict rates and stick with 5-year maturities or less, 7 years max when yields look too attractive to pass up.. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dale_G

Joined: 20 Feb 2007 Posts: 884 Location: central Florida - on the mature side of 70
|
Posted: Sat Oct 10, 2009 12:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
bmb: On the other hand, CD or bond rates are 15% only when inflation is going through the roof - so no one wants to buy fixed income.
15% bonds only look good in retrospect. What people did instead was buy their washing machines, driers and sofas now before prices went up.
I lived through the high inflation 70s. Working people kept zip in banks, bonds or CDs. Despite your statement that inflation seldom persists for long, the length of the persistence is unknowable at the time.
And how long will the present low interest rates persist? Please let us know, we'll adjust our CD maturities appropriately..
Dale _________________ first we crawl, then we walk, then we run, later we use any available transportation |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
knowmad
Joined: 06 Feb 2009 Posts: 417
|
Posted: Sat Oct 10, 2009 1:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
| grok87 wrote: | | knowmad wrote: | | I find that CDs over 3 years are almost always a bad choice compared to short to medium term bond funds. Under 3 years they are a great safety net. |
ok...
can you give us an example please?
cheers, |
Bankrate.com says the average 5yr CD is paying 2.9%. Vanguard.com says that Total Bond Market Index had a distribution yield of 3.86% for September. Bond funds are riskier, but the longer you hold them, the more this risk is mitigated. The question is whether the added safety of FDIC insurance and guaranteed principle is worth sacrificing the extra yield bond funds provide. Right now, the yields are fairly close, but if you compare total return of total bond market index to a 1-10yr CD ladder over all 10 year periods in the last 30 years, what do you get? I'd bet that the bond fund wins for the vast majority of all 10 yr slices, but I'd be interested if anyone has the numbers. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
tfb

Joined: 19 Feb 2007 Posts: 3584
|
Posted: Sat Oct 10, 2009 2:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
I agree there is inefficiency in retail CDs. Close to best CD rates should always beat equivalent term Treasurys. However, interest rates don't "jump" overnight. They go up gradually. When to break the CD, pay penalty and reinvest becomes an interesting question.
Suppose you are in a 7-year 4% CD with a 6-month interest penalty. 1 year down the road, the 6-year CD gives 4.5%. Breaking it costs you 2% and it takes 4 years to breakeven. Do you do it or do you wait? _________________ The Finance Buff |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rs2007
Joined: 21 Sep 2007 Posts: 38
|
Posted: Sat Oct 10, 2009 7:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Are we basically talking about CD laddering? Just get the longest CD like a 5 year every year, and one will matter each year, rinse, repeat. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
grok87
Joined: 27 Feb 2007 Posts: 3371
|
Posted: Sat Oct 10, 2009 10:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
| rs2007 wrote: | | Are we basically talking about CD laddering? Just get the longest CD like a 5 year every year, and one will matter each year, rinse, repeat. |
Umm you mean "mature" instead of "matter" right (not trying to be pedantic just trying to understand.)
The issue mostly arises if you are trying to invest a lump sum into CDs. The traditional advice would be to buy different maturities to make a ladder (Put 20% in 1 year CDs, 20% in 2 year CDs, 20% in 3 year CDs, 20% in 4 year CDs, 20% in 5 year CDs, for example).
The strategy the article (and myself) recommends for consideration, is that if there is a higher yield for a 7 year CD (Penfed has 4% for a 7 year right now) then put 100% in that 7 year CD. Let's take a look at the current PenFed rates and how the two strategies compare under some scenarios:
Strategy 1) Laddering: The 5 year laddering approach above would produce a yield of 2.25% (1.25%, 1.75%, 2.50%, 2.75%, 3.00%)
Strategy 2) Go Long: Putting it all in the 7 year would produce a yield of 4%.
Now let's say interest rates rise by 3% (300 bps) after a year.
Strategy 1) Laddering: You now get to replace your old 1 year CD @ 1.25% with a new 5 year one at 6%. So your yield goes up to 3.2% for the second year. Assuming no further rate changes during the 5 year period you would earn 4.05% in year three, 4.75% in year four and 5.35% in year five, and then 6% thereafter.
Strategy 2) Go Long: Since rates have gone up so much, you would cash the CD you bought last year and buy a new 7 year CD yielding 7%. So you earn 0% for the first year, and 7% thereafter.
Let's make this simple and assume a $10,000 initial fund for each strategy, and that you don't reinvest the interest (i.e.you live off it.) Then in this scenario the cash flows are:
Strategy 1): $225, $320, $405, $475, $535, $600, $600, $600, etc.
Straetgy 2): $0, $700, $700, $700, $700, $700, $700, $700, $700, etc.
So Strategy 2) is lower for the first year but thereafter wins. Through the end of year 2 for example Strategy 2 generates $700 in cash flow as opposed to $545 for strategy 1).
If instead interest rates drop (say by 2%) then I think Strategy 2) is obviously superior.
cheers, _________________ grok, CFA |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
grok87
Joined: 27 Feb 2007 Posts: 3371
|
Posted: Sat Oct 10, 2009 11:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
| tfb wrote: | I agree there is inefficiency in retail CDs. Close to best CD rates should always beat equivalent term Treasurys. However, interest rates don't "jump" overnight. They go up gradually. When to break the CD, pay penalty and reinvest becomes an interesting question.
Suppose you are in a 7-year 4% CD with a 6-month interest penalty. 1 year down the road, the 6-year CD gives 4.5%. Breaking it costs you 2% and it takes 4 years to breakeven. Do you do it or do you wait? |
Probably a close call. The advantage of the strategy really becomes evident when there are either large interest rate increases or decreases.
cheers, _________________ grok, CFA |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Financial Samurai

Joined: 10 Oct 2009 Posts: 1 Location: San Francisco
|
Posted: Sat Oct 10, 2009 12:09 pm Post subject: Love the discussion here! |
|
|
Hi Guys,
Interesting discussion we've got here, and I've enjoyed reading all the good commentary and advice.
Just some thoughts:
* How can my strategy be backwards if it's a consistent strategy that is employed in high and low inflationary environments? The 10-yr yield is back down to 3.25% and it certainly doesn't seem like rates are going up too much despite all the monetary expansion b/c the Output Gap is still huge.
* Yields at particular maturation points are pretty efficient for the most part. Hence, so long as we have an upward sloping yield curve, who cares what inflation is... the market is baking it in already and paying accordingly!
* The money I recommend investing in CD's is money you don't ever plan to touch. Hence, you won't be paying a penalty to withdraw anyway!
* After 5 years, your BLENDED CD yield is 100% going to be higher than any CD yield strategy with shorter durations, and most certainly your savings yield.
Keep the discussion a live, and hope to see you guys at Financial Samurai one day!
Keigu,
Financial Samurai - "Slicing Through Money's Mysteries" |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
azxcvbnm321
Joined: 20 Aug 2007 Posts: 263
|
Posted: Sat Oct 10, 2009 6:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Isn't the language of most CDs something like, the bank MAY allow you to withdraw you money, at which point you pay a penalty, but this is at the banks' discretion and they are under no obligation to give you access to your money before the term ends?
I know as a general practice banks allow customers to take out money early, they figure most people who do that really need the money and they don't want the bad PR of denying an old grandmother money to pay for her mother's funeral or something like that. But should people start to use their generosity and treat it as an option, then the bank might decide to get tough and not allow you to withdraw money. I can't imagine a bank, in a liquidity crunch, allowing customers to take money out early if they have any say in the matter at all.
Unless there is a law that forces banks to allow early redemption, I'd bet that the language in the CD will favor the bank and give the bank the final option of granting you early exit with penalty, or not. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nisiprius

Joined: 26 Jul 2007 Posts: 9264 Location: North America; Western Hemisphere; the Earth; the Solar System; the Universe; the Mind of God
|
Posted: Sat Oct 10, 2009 6:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| azxcvbnm321 wrote: | | Isn't the language of most CDs something like, the bank MAY allow you to withdraw you money, at which point you pay a penalty, but this is at the banks' discretion and they are under no obligation to give you access to your money before the term ends? | The answer appears to be: sometimes it is and sometimes it isn't, the terms vary and if it's important to you, you must read them, and investigate carefully.
I've personally, on more than one occasion, seen fine print that said clearly that it was at the bank's discretion. On one of those occasions the bank customer rep had told me flatly that I could redeem the CD any time I liked. And if I understand some earlier posts in this thread, Taylor Larimore was also given inaccurate information about terms and conditions by a bank customer rep.
I've also personally seen fine print that discussed the penalties for early withdrawal and simply said nothing at all about whether there were any restrictions on early withdrawal. That's probably the case with the PenFed terms posted above. So, if it doesn't mention any restrictions, does that necessarily imply you have an unrestricted right to make an early withdrawal? Beats me. | Quote: | | Unless there is a law that forces banks to allow early redemption, I'd bet that the language in the CD will favor the bank and give the bank the final option of granting you early exit with penalty, or not. | Since banking is a complex maze with some stuff being regulated by states and some by the Feds and different charters and different classes of institutions it wouldn't surprise me if the differences in terms had something to do with the regulations applying to that specific bank. I'd love to know more and don't know how to find out. _________________ Annual income twenty pounds, annual expenditure nineteen nineteen and six, result happiness; Annual income twenty pounds, annual expenditure twenty pounds ought and six, result misery. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dm200

Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 3127 Location: Washington DC area Born 1946
|
Posted: Sat Oct 10, 2009 11:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
To the best of my knowledge, the Truth In Savings disclosures from banks and credit unions will always state the conditions and penalties for early withdrawal. I have looked at a few and the wording on the ones I looked at is not a trick - they say there is a penalty for early withdrawal.
I do know some institutions have CDs where no early withdrawal is allowed (except perhaps for death). |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Fbone

Joined: 20 Jun 2009 Posts: 548
|
Posted: Sun Oct 11, 2009 12:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
I find in my local CU that the spread between a 1yr and 5yr CD is so small that the penalty outweighs benefits. And they often have "special offers" that make the short term CDs a better deal.
Currently 1yr is 1.69%
2yr is 2.23
4yr is 2.72
5yr is 2.48
6yr is 2.28 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rb313
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 125 Location: VA
|
Posted: Sun Oct 11, 2009 11:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
| grok87 wrote: | | rs2007 wrote: | | Are we basically talking about CD laddering? Just get the longest CD like a 5 year every year, and one will matter each year, rinse, repeat. |
Umm you mean "mature" instead of "matter" right (not trying to be pedantic just trying to understand.)
The issue mostly arises if you are trying to invest a lump sum into CDs. The traditional advice would be to buy different maturities to make a ladder (Put 20% in 1 year CDs, 20% in 2 year CDs, 20% in 3 year CDs, 20% in 4 year CDs, 20% in 5 year CDs, for example).
The strategy the article (and myself) recommends for consideration, is that if there is a higher yield for a 7 year CD (Penfed has 4% for a 7 year right now) then put 100% in that 7 year CD. Let's take a look at the current PenFed rates and how the two strategies compare under some scenarios:
Strategy 1) Laddering: The 5 year laddering approach above would produce a yield of 2.25% (1.25%, 1.75%, 2.50%, 2.75%, 3.00%)
Strategy 2) Go Long: Putting it all in the 7 year would produce a yield of 4%.
Now let's say interest rates rise by 3% (300 bps) after a year.
Strategy 1) Laddering: You now get to replace your old 1 year CD @ 1.25% with a new 5 year one at 6%. So your yield goes up to 3.2% for the second year. Assuming no further rate changes during the 5 year period you would earn 4.05% in year three, 4.75% in year four and 5.35% in year five, and then 6% thereafter.
Strategy 2) Go Long: Since rates have gone up so much, you would cash the CD you bought last year and buy a new 7 year CD yielding 7%. So you earn 0% for the first year, and 7% thereafter.
Let's make this simple and assume a $10,000 initial fund for each strategy, and that you don't reinvest the interest (i.e.you live off it.) Then in this scenario the cash flows are:
Strategy 1): $225, $320, $405, $475, $535, $600, $600, $600, etc.
Straetgy 2): $0, $700, $700, $700, $700, $700, $700, $700, $700, etc.
So Strategy 2) is lower for the first year but thereafter wins. Through the end of year 2 for example Strategy 2 generates $700 in cash flow as opposed to $545 for strategy 1).
If instead interest rates drop (say by 2%) then I think Strategy 2) is obviously superior.
cheers, |
But, if interest rates go up each and every year, and each year you take the penalty, you could end up with nothing to show for your efforts. (?) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rb313
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 125 Location: VA
|
Posted: Wed Oct 14, 2009 2:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Bumping this because I don't think any conclusion was come to. To me. a strategy of rolling CDs would do better than a strategy of buying long and cashing out for a higher rate in the environment of regularly rising rates. Not to predict interest, but I think the least likely scenario would be a big bump followed by many flat years, as in above example. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Beth
Joined: 05 Apr 2007 Posts: 283
|
Posted: Wed Oct 14, 2009 4:58 pm Post subject: Here's the salient point, I think |
|
|
| Financial Samurai wrote: |
* The money I recommend investing in CD's is money you don't ever plan to touch. Hence, you won't be paying a penalty to withdraw anyway!
* After 5 years, your BLENDED CD yield is 100% going to be higher than any CD yield strategy with shorter durations, and most certainly your savings yield.
|
Intuitively, I sensed this myself awhile ago as I was thinking about what to do with a maturing CD that I would not need for several more years. As the author of the referenced article and this first-time poster (welcome!) observes, if this is extra cash that you simply are looking for a safe and low risk place to park, then going long to get a far superior rate seems like a good deal to me. It seems to me to be less risky than a bond fund with an average duration similar to the term of the CD you purchase. But I think it's fair to point out that this is a strategy that you play having convinced yourself you have a reasonable chance of getting an above market return if held to term. Regards, Beth |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
grok87
Joined: 27 Feb 2007 Posts: 3371
|
Posted: Wed Oct 14, 2009 9:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| rb313 wrote: | | Bumping this because I don't think any conclusion was come to. To me. a strategy of rolling CDs would do better than a strategy of buying long and cashing out for a higher rate in the environment of regularly rising rates. Not to predict interest, but I think the least likely scenario would be a big bump followed by many flat years, as in above example. |
Well I suppose you could always split the difference between the two strategies...
THe other way to think about it is that the ability to cash out early and lose x months interest is equivalent to an embedded put option. Consider Pen Fed's cds for example:
5 year cd @ 3%, lose 6 months interest (=1.5%) if cash out early
7 year cd @ 4% lose 1 years interest (=4%) if cash out early
So the 5 year cd has an embedded put option @ 98.5% (=100%-1.5%)
and the 7 year cd has an embedded put option @ 96% (=100%-4%)
It's hard to know what the value of these put options are but clearly they are worth something. One could use an option valuation model to value them and see which is the better deal, the 5 year or the 7 year.
I realize all of this sounds kind of academic at this point. But in a year or so if interest rates spike by 2%-3%, you will probably see a bunch of threads from people about whether they should cash in their long term CDs, taking the interest penalty, and reinvest at higher rates. The economics of the situation will be obvious at that point.
cheers, _________________ grok, CFA |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nisiprius

Joined: 26 Jul 2007 Posts: 9264 Location: North America; Western Hemisphere; the Earth; the Solar System; the Universe; the Mind of God
|
Posted: Wed Oct 14, 2009 10:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| dm200 wrote: | To the best of my knowledge, the Truth In Savings disclosures from banks and credit unions will always state the conditions and penalties for early withdrawal. I have looked at a few and the wording on the ones I looked at is not a trick - they say there is a penalty for early withdrawal.
I do know some institutions have CDs where no early withdrawal is allowed (except perhaps for death). | So your understanding is that if there are any restrictions on your ability to make an early withdrawal, those would need to be explicitly disclosed.
(Yes, I know I fuss about this too much).  _________________ Annual income twenty pounds, annual expenditure nineteen nineteen and six, result happiness; Annual income twenty pounds, annual expenditure twenty pounds ought and six, result misery. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
G12

Joined: 16 Apr 2007 Posts: 1015
|
Posted: Thu Oct 15, 2009 1:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Searching for places to park cash over the last 3 months has become challenging. INGdirect had a 1-year CD last week for 2.25% with a 90-day early withdrawal penalty or an online insured MMF with CapOne is paying 1.73%. Why would an investor consider buying a ST bond fund that will have a YTM less than half of what the average stated coupon rate is, short duration or not? I would prefer to sit on cash earning nothing compared to accepting a significant loss on a bond fund that will lose value when interest rates turn. Then I look at the 4.625% mortgage I have which probably has one more year of deductible itemized interest expense and think why not just pay it it off. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Patchy Groundfog
Joined: 05 Mar 2009 Posts: 170
|
Posted: Thu Oct 15, 2009 6:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
| G12 wrote: | | Searching for places to park cash over the last 3 months has become challenging. INGdirect had a 1-year CD last week for 2.25% with a 90-day early withdrawal penalty or an online insured MMF with CapOne is paying 1.73%. Why would an investor consider buying a ST bond fund that will have a YTM less than half of what the average stated coupon rate is, short duration or not? I would prefer to sit on cash earning nothing compared to accepting a significant loss on a bond fund that will lose value when interest rates turn. Then I look at the 4.625% mortgage I have which probably has one more year of deductible itemized interest expense and think why not just pay it it off. |
I'm paying off my mortgage with a CD maturing next month, plus some cash from money market. Where else can I get 4.85%? (I've had to take the standard deduction for a couple of years now.) Even if I couldn't completely pay off the mortgage, since this is medium-term money, would it make sense to just apply that much to principle, or to pay off some other debt with it, if I had any?
Anything you do with fixed income looking five years out is a bet on interest rates/inflation, but for someone in a sit-tight, preservation mode, pulling back that mortgage interest seems like the thing to do. _________________ The best things in life aren't things. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dm200

Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 3127 Location: Washington DC area Born 1946
|
Posted: Thu Oct 15, 2009 11:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
| nisiprius wrote: | | dm200 wrote: | To the best of my knowledge, the Truth In Savings disclosures from banks and credit unions will always state the conditions and penalties for early withdrawal. I have looked at a few and the wording on the ones I looked at is not a trick - they say there is a penalty for early withdrawal.
I do know some institutions have CDs where no early withdrawal is allowed (except perhaps for death). | So your understanding is that if there are any restrictions on your ability to make an early withdrawal, those would need to be explicitly disclosed.
(Yes, I know I fuss about this too much).  |
No, I think it is probably the other way around. You should not assume that you can withdraw funds early unless the disclosure says so, in some form. I would interpret the common wording about a penalty for early withdrafal as indicating that early withdrawals are allowed. I have seen some CDs where it does explicitly say no early withdrawals allowed. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bob's not my name
Joined: 15 Nov 2009 Posts: 600
|
Posted: Sun Nov 22, 2009 6:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
| grok87 wrote: | | rs2007 wrote: | | Are we basically talking about CD laddering? Just get the longest CD like a 5 year every year, and one will matter each year, rinse, repeat. |
Umm you mean "mature" instead of "matter" right (not trying to be pedantic just trying to understand.)
The issue mostly arises if you are trying to invest a lump sum into CDs. The traditional advice would be to buy different maturities to make a ladder (Put 20% in 1 year CDs, 20% in 2 year CDs, 20% in 3 year CDs, 20% in 4 year CDs, 20% in 5 year CDs, for example).
The strategy the article (and myself) recommends for consideration, is that if there is a higher yield for a 7 year CD (Penfed has 4% for a 7 year right now) then put 100% in that 7 year CD. Let's take a look at the current PenFed rates and how the two strategies compare under some scenarios:
Strategy 1) Laddering: The 5 year laddering approach above would produce a yield of 2.25% (1.25%, 1.75%, 2.50%, 2.75%, 3.00%)
Strategy 2) Go Long: Putting it all in the 7 year would produce a yield of 4%.
Now let's say interest rates rise by 3% (300 bps) after a year.
Strategy 1) Laddering: You now get to replace your old 1 year CD @ 1.25% with a new 5 year one at 6%. So your yield goes up to 3.2% for the second year. Assuming no further rate changes during the 5 year period you would earn 4.05% in year three, 4.75% in year four and 5.35% in year five, and then 6% thereafter.
Strategy 2) Go Long: Since rates have gone up so much, you would cash the CD you bought last year and buy a new 7 year CD yielding 7%. So you earn 0% for the first year, and 7% thereafter.
Let's make this simple and assume a $10,000 initial fund for each strategy, and that you don't reinvest the interest (i.e.you live off it.) Then in this scenario the cash flows are:
Strategy 1): $225, $320, $405, $475, $535, $600, $600, $600, etc.
Straetgy 2): $0, $700, $700, $700, $700, $700, $700, $700, $700, etc.
So Strategy 2) is lower for the first year but thereafter wins. Through the end of year 2 for example Strategy 2 generates $700 in cash flow as opposed to $545 for strategy 1).
If instead interest rates drop (say by 2%) then I think Strategy 2) is obviously superior.
cheers, |
I believe the comparison is not scientific for several reasons. First, if the investor's bank offers 7-year CDs (none of my banks do), why would he exclude that term from his laddering strategy? Second, you must allow both strategies to exploit the proposed tactic of cashing in long-term CDs when interest rates "spike". That means the laddering guy gets to do the same with his long term CDs. Third, is it common for interest rates to spike and then remain flat? In a multi-year inflationary environment the laddering guy keeps rolling over at higher rates, while the 7-year-bloc guy is going to do what -- cash out every year with a penalty and never earn any interest? Fourth, the interest rate differential between a 1-year CD and the longest term offered (5 years) at my CU is a little less than you use in your example. (Other posters above also made the latter two points.)
I have three further comments: 1) In my experience, CU's often offer exceptional rates for brief periods of time on particular maturities. Laddering (without being dogmatic about it, and assuming that the serendipity of life causes your needs and investing horizons for packets of money to change sometimes) allows you to capitalize on such opportunities. For example, my CU was still offering 3.7% on 1-year CDs last December, and they just bumped the 1-year jumbo rate from 1.59% to 2.24%. 2) My CU offers certificate-secured personal loans at 1.5% above the CD rate. This might be an alternative to cashing out and paying a 1-year penalty if interest rates jump near the end of the extant CD's term. 3) Time is money. If you spend a lot of time trying to "play" the boring CD market, you're making below minimum wage. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
spam

Joined: 10 Jun 2008 Posts: 901
|
Posted: Sun Nov 22, 2009 8:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
I just created a 5 year CD ladder from brokered CD's in a large tax-advantaged 20 / 80 fixed-income account. I bought 1,2,3,4,and 5 year CDs with the same maturity date and the total represents 10% of this account. I hope to buy longer-term instruments when these mature. I did this for several reasons.
1) To protect this cash from me.
2) To help immunize this account against interest rate and market risk.
3) To harvest gains from bond funds that are now trading at historic highs.
I suspect that interest rates will begin to rise within the next 5 years, so I have taken a slightly pro-active position. I don't know what the most attractive instument will be down the road, CD's, TIPs, Treasuries, or Corporates, but I do know that this slice will hold individual issues held to maturity. After all, the Fed could raise interest rates BEFORE inflation resumes. Previously purchased TIPs would suffer, but new issues could could come with a very attractive coupon. For now, the best rates I could find are with the CD's, and I am happy to wait and see what develops.
I consider this decision to be more positional than predictive. I do hope to increase the term to 10 - 20 years as these mature, but I will take what I think is the best deal at the time.
Thats my plan, and I plan to stick to it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
spam

Joined: 10 Jun 2008 Posts: 901
|
Posted: Sun Nov 22, 2009 8:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
| knowmad wrote: | | I find that CDs over 3 years are almost always a bad choice compared to short to medium term bond funds. Under 3 years they are a great safety net. |
In what context? VBIIX has an average duration of 6.3. If interest rates go up 3% then the NAV of this fund will tank 18.9% My 5 year CD will loose nothing on maturity, and I will be able to buy shares of your fund at a discount. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
stevewolfe
Joined: 10 Oct 2008 Posts: 344
|
Posted: Sun Nov 22, 2009 9:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
| nisiprius wrote: | | dm200 wrote: | To the best of my knowledge, the Truth In Savings disclosures from banks and credit unions will always state the conditions and penalties for early withdrawal. I have looked at a few and the wording on the ones I looked at is not a trick - they say there is a penalty for early withdrawal.
I do know some institutions have CDs where no early withdrawal is allowed (except perhaps for death). | So your understanding is that if there are any restrictions on your ability to make an early withdrawal, those would need to be explicitly disclosed.
(Yes, I know I fuss about this too much).  |
It's a good point to stress though nisiprius because it seems every bank has a slightly different rule set for breaking the CD early.
I just checked with our bank and there is an asterisk after each of the term / penalty break outs which reads to the effect "... the penalty will be based on the current rates at the time the CD is redeemed...". So a put option can't be calculated in advance with these CD's, would need to be determined at the time you wanted to break it... Which makes it less desirable to break due to the fee going up as interest rates go up. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
RobG
Joined: 28 Feb 2007 Posts: 609 Location: Bozeman, MT
|
Posted: Sun Nov 22, 2009 11:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
Regarding the issue of redemption, I have bought/sold two CDs through Vanguard's brokerage services with absolutely no problems. Both times they were sold with a gain. I'm not sure why they aren't mentioned here.
For the last several years their CD rates have exceeded comparable treasuries and competitive with total bond market, even though they have shorter duration. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
hudson
Joined: 06 Apr 2007 Posts: 419
|
Posted: Sun Nov 22, 2009 12:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Vanguard brokered CD rates
Maturity Rate
3 month 0.20%
6 month 0.50%
9 month 0.85%
1 year 1.35%
18 month 1.85%
2 year 2.05%
3 year 2.50%
4 year 2.80%
5 year 3.10%
https://personal.vanguard.com/us/funds/bonds |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
stevewolfe
Joined: 10 Oct 2008 Posts: 344
|
Posted: Sun Nov 22, 2009 1:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Wow - compared to the 1 year rate the current I-Bond looks like a good deal... it could draw 0 for the second 6 month period and still beat that rate... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bob's not my name
Joined: 15 Nov 2009 Posts: 600
|
Posted: Sun Nov 22, 2009 1:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sure, but brokered CDs include a hidden commission for the broker*. My CU offers 1-year jumbo CDs at 2.25%. If I understand I-bonds correctly, you could make as little as 1.68% at the current rate if, as you suggest, the second 6-months dropped to zero. If the rate doesn't change, you could earn 3.36% minus the 3-month penalty for cashing early, or 2.52%. My CU matches that rate on an 18-month jumbo. Holding the I-bond for 18-months at a stable rate might yield 3.36% + 1.68% - 0.84% = 4.2% = 2.8% annualized.
So I-bonds compare favorably to short-term CDs, but it's not very compelling, and you're limited to $5,000 per year for I-bonds, so shouldn't you be buying them for the long term rather than as a substitute for 1-year CDs?
*Which is not to say brokered CDs are all bad -- you have more choice in banks and terms, you can sell on the secondary market if you need to, and you have the survivor's option. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
spam

Joined: 10 Jun 2008 Posts: 901
|
Posted: Sun Nov 22, 2009 4:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Bob's not my name wrote:
| Quote: | | Sure, but brokered CDs include a hidden commission for the broker*. |
From the Fidelity Website:
| Quote: | All new issue CDs offered by Fidelity are fee-free.1
All new issue CDs offered by Fidelity are FDIC-insured.1
The secondary CDs Fidelity offers come from multiple sources, providing investors with a single location to view brokered CDs from many banks.2
Brokered CDs have some important advantages over bank CDs2 including the ability to avoid penalties if the CD is sold before maturity. They also have some inherent risks. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bob's not my name
Joined: 15 Nov 2009 Posts: 600
|
Posted: Sun Nov 22, 2009 6:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| "Another benefit of brokered certificates of deposit, is that while the broker receives a commission for selling you a CD, it doesn't come out of your pocket. The bank pays the broker." That's what I meant by hidden. Just because Fidelity says you pay no fee doesn't mean a fee wasn't paid -- it's reflected in your interest rate. Brokered CDs are attractive because your broker can shop nationwide for the best rates, which would be a major hassle for you. However, the broker is of course making money on the deal. Broker's commissions on many fixed income vehicles have become more apparent at today's very low interest rates -- for example, a broker often charges 1% annually to put your money in a mutual fund, which is ridiculous when bond mutual funds are paying only a few percent. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
stevewolfe
Joined: 10 Oct 2008 Posts: 344
|
Posted: Sun Nov 22, 2009 7:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Bob's not my name wrote: | | So I-bonds compare favorably to short-term CDs, but it's not very compelling, and you're limited to $5,000 per year for I-bonds, so shouldn't you be buying them for the long term rather than as a substitute for 1-year CDs? |
I compared them to the 1 year CD in my post - the previous poster listed the 1 year at 1.35%. The fixed rate on the current I-Bond is not attractive for a long term investment in my opinion, so using my $20k allotment (electronic / paper for myself and my spouse) for a short term investment if it is competitive is reasonable. What am I missing here? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
hudson
Joined: 06 Apr 2007 Posts: 419
|
Posted: Sun Nov 22, 2009 8:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I-Bonds purchase limit per year:
5000 treasury direct and 5000 paper...total 10K
If married, you could purchase 10K for your wife.
The limit is 10K per social security number so you could also buy them for your children?
From Treasury Direct:
http://www.treasurydirect.gov/....ibonds.htm
Buying I Bonds through TreasuryDirect:
Sold at face value; you pay $50 for a $50 bond.
Purchased in amounts of $25 or more, to the penny.
$5,000 maximum purchase in one calendar year.
Issued electronically to your designated account.
Buying Paper I Bonds:
Sold at face value; i.e., you pay $50 for a $50 bond.
Purchased in denominations of $50, $75, $100, $200, $500, $1,000, and $5,000.
$5,000 maximum purchase in one calendar year.
Issued as paper bond certificates. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
grok87
Joined: 27 Feb 2007 Posts: 3371
|
Posted: Sun Nov 22, 2009 8:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Bob's not my name wrote: | | grok87 wrote: | | rs2007 wrote: | | Are we basically talking about CD laddering? Just get the longest CD like a 5 year every year, and one will matter each year, rinse, repeat. |
Umm you mean "mature" instead of "matter" right (not trying to be pedantic just trying to understand.)
The issue mostly arises if you are trying to invest a lump sum into CDs. The traditional advice would be to buy different maturities to make a ladder (Put 20% in 1 year CDs, 20% in 2 year CDs, 20% in 3 year CDs, 20% in 4 year CDs, 20% in 5 year CDs, for example).
The strategy the article (and myself) recommends for consideration, is that if there is a higher yield for a 7 year CD (Penfed has 4% for a 7 year right now) then put 100% in that 7 year CD. Let's take a look at the current PenFed rates and how the two strategies compare under some scenarios:
Strategy 1) Laddering: The 5 year laddering approach above would produce a yield of 2.25% (1.25%, 1.75%, 2.50%, 2.75%, 3.00%)
Strategy 2) Go Long: Putting it all in the 7 year would produce a yield of 4%.
Now let's say interest rates rise by 3% (300 bps) after a year.
Strategy 1) Laddering: You now get to replace your old 1 year CD @ 1.25% with a new 5 year one at 6%. So your yield goes up to 3.2% for the second year. Assuming no further rate changes during the 5 year period you would earn 4.05% in year three, 4.75% in year four and 5.35% in year five, and then 6% thereafter.
Strategy 2) Go Long: Since rates have gone up so much, you would cash the CD you bought last year and buy a new 7 year CD yielding 7%. So you earn 0% for the first year, and 7% thereafter.
Let's make this simple and assume a $10,000 initial fund for each strategy, and that you don't reinvest the interest (i.e.you live off it.) Then in this scenario the cash flows are:
Strategy 1): $225, $320, $405, $475, $535, $600, $600, $600, etc.
Straetgy 2): $0, $700, $700, $700, $700, $700, $700, $700, $700, etc.
So Strategy 2) is lower for the first year but thereafter wins. Through the end of year 2 for example Strategy 2 generates $700 in cash flow as opposed to $545 for strategy 1).
If instead interest rates drop (say by 2%) then I think Strategy 2) is obviously superior.
cheers, |
I believe the comparison is not scientific for several reasons. First, if the investor's bank offers 7-year CDs (none of my banks do), why would he exclude that term from his laddering strategy? Second, you must allow both strategies to exploit the proposed tactic of cashing in long-term CDs when interest rates "spike". That means the laddering guy gets to do the same with his long term CDs. Third, is it common for interest rates to spike and then remain flat? In a multi-year inflationary environment the laddering guy keeps rolling over at higher rates, while the 7-year-bloc guy is going to do what -- cash out every year with a penalty and never earn any interest? Fourth, the interest rate differential between a 1-year CD and the longest term offered (5 years) at my CU is a little less than you use in your example. (Other posters above also made the latter two points.)
I have three further comments: 1) In my experience, CU's often offer exceptional rates for brief periods of time on particular maturities. Laddering (without being dogmatic about it, and assuming that the serendipity of life causes your needs and investing horizons for packets of money to change sometimes) allows you to capitalize on such opportunities. For example, my CU was still offering 3.7% on 1-year CDs last December, and they just bumped the 1-year jumbo rate from 1.59% to 2.24%. 2) My CU offers certificate-secured personal loans at 1.5% above the CD rate. This might be an alternative to cashing out and paying a 1-year penalty if interest rates jump near the end of the extant CD's term. 3) Time is money. If you spend a lot of time trying to "play" the boring CD market, you're making below minimum wage. |
I think the basic point is that with the right bank/credit union cds (not brokerage cds) that you get not only a great rate compared to treasuries and corporate bonds, but you also get a free put at like 96-97 (assuming you lose 1 year's interest of 3-4 %).
This is in contrast to muni/mortgage backed securities/corporate bonds which are often callable- i.e. the issuer has a call option.
This put option limits your downside in a similar way that limiting your duration limits your downside for regular bonds. So you can extend maturity, and capture better yield for the same downside. This is the basic idea of bond investing- in fact all investing- getting the best yield/returns with the least risk. Sometimes there is a free lunch- when it happens you should load up...
cheers, _________________ grok, CFA |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|