 |
Bogleheads Investing Advice Inspired by Jack Bogle
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
cardude
Joined: 03 Aug 2009 Posts: 25
|
Posted: Tue Aug 11, 2009 10:37 am Post subject: Transitioning portfolio from accumulation to ER |
|
|
Hello all. I recently took early early retirement and am considering my options on transitioning my portfolio to a somewhat more normal type of retirement portfolio using Vanguard funds. However, I want to keep a fairly large percentage of Berkshire Hathaway as a core holding (30-40%-- currently 48.8%), but the rest is fair game. I need to structure a portfolio around the core holding to give me some security against long periods of underperformance of this particular stock. I know this serious overwieght in Berkshire may sound crazy, but I have made some good money on Berkshire over the last 15 years buying and selling at mostly the right times and think I may have some success going forward. I do worry a little about a Black Swan type of event from time to time however........Any ideas are appreciated!
At this time I am pulling 2.5-3% per year out of my cash pile to pay for living expenses. Here is my info in the standard format:
Emergency funds = don't have a seperate account set aside for this due to the large % of portfolio in cash for living expenses.
Debt: home mortgage at 5.125 %. This is an ARM that can adjust in 5 years so I may need to pay it off. My plan was to pay it off when the market recovered, but if that does not happen in 5 years I may need to reserve the cash to do so or just refi and lock for a longer term.
Tax Filing Status: married filing jointly, wife works.
Tax Rate: Federal -- 25% State of Residence-- TX
Age: 44
Desired Asset allocation: (stocks/bonds) 70/30
Intl allocation: 5%
Current portfolio : mid 7 figure portfolio size
Taxable
16.5% cash
48.8% Berkshire Hathaway (brka, brkb)
18.3% managed account that is slowly turned into cash as it slowly recovers-- mostly small caps. 1% fee
5.4% angel investments, locked up for 5 years
2.4% Wellesley (VWINX) .23 exp ratio
1.6% Longleaf Internatonal (LLINX) 1.6 exp ratio
1.6% Third Ave Value (TAVLX) 1.11 exp ratio
.6% conoco phillips (cop)
.4% Wells Fargo (wfc)
His 401K at Sentry (soon to be rolled to Vanguard)
2.5% cash
His Vanguard IRA brokerage
1.1% Berkshire (BRKB).
Her IRA at Vanguard
.8% various stocks (GE, DIS, Brkb) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Lauren Vignec
Joined: 16 Feb 2008 Posts: 155
|
Posted: Wed Aug 12, 2009 7:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hello Cardude,
Retiring early is no small feat--congratulations. Many Bogleheads retired early, and hopefully one or two of them will chime in on this thread.
You have done an exceptionally good job of saving up a retirement portfolio. Are you, or were you before you retired, an entrepreneur? You might be an exception, but normally people who achieve what you have took some big risks to get there.
Taking big risks with wealth you have already accumulated, especially once retired, is an entirely different story from taking risks while accumulating.
Here is a question: would you buy that managed small cap account today, if you hadn't owned it previously? If not, then there is no reason to keep holding it, unless taxes are the issue. A bad investment is just a bad investment. If the managed account doesn't make sense in your portfolio it is best to let it go, and replace it with something more diversified.
The Berkshire stock is certainly a good investment, but at such a large portion of the portfolio it is, as you are aware, very risky.
When you say you are withdrawing 3%, do you mean 3% of the whole portfolio, or 3% of your cash position? Berkshire is an excellent company, and if your income needs are small enough relative to your whole portfolio, maybe you can afford the risk. But think of the other side of the equation. How much will your life really be improved by keeping BRK, instead of a more diversified portfolio, even if BRK outperforms the diversified portfolio?
Imagine if you only kept 10% of the portfolio in the Berkshire stock, sold the investments that you don't really want, and put together a portfolio of Vanguard index funds, cash, and short or limited term tax-exempt bond funds. There would be much less risk, and even if the investments you currently hold had great returns, those returns might not be much better than the more diversified portfolio anyway. How much will you really care about the additional wealth you might have missed out on?
Sincerely,
L |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
pkcrafter
Joined: 04 Mar 2007 Posts: 3097 Location: CA
|
Posted: Wed Aug 12, 2009 7:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Cardude,
Lauren's concerns are probably going to be reinforced by most other posters. It isn't wise to fall in love with a stock. Holding half your portfolio in that one stock is simply not prudent. You ask that we work around it, but there really is no good way to do that if you want to improve your portfolio and manage risk. Most of the rest of your portfolio is in amounts too small to have any effect on diversification and then there is the tax efficiency issue. You really need to look at this more objectively.
Paul _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
LH

Joined: 14 Mar 2007 Posts: 2521
|
Posted: Wed Aug 12, 2009 7:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I would chime in, the BRK is a big risk. Its hard for me to see past that, and talk about other things. Its like a guy standing in a lions cage, and asking me about whether the mosquito on his arm is going to give him west nile virus, dude, get out of the cage is what I would say.
10 percent mad money sounds like a fine behavorial compromise, time BRK with it, keep the 90 percent, design the portfolio around it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DSInvestor
Joined: 04 Oct 2008 Posts: 2679
|
Posted: Wed Aug 12, 2009 9:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
To paraphrase Larry Swedroe, you seem to want to keep playing a game that you've already won. Here's a link to Larry Swedroe's blog article How do you know when you have enough?. It's a 4 part series. Please follow the links at the bottom of the article.
The rest of the portfolio is not set for tax efficiency. Please see Principles of Tax-Efficient Fund Placement on the Bogleheads Wiki.
You're looking for 70/30 AA but only have 4.5% tax advantaged space. Considering filling the tax advantaged space with taxable bond funds first, then use tax exempt bond funds in taxable accounts to complete bond allocation.
- Shift all tax advantaged accounts to fixed income investments (Inflation Protected Securities VIPSX/VAIPX or Total Bond Market VBMFX/VBTLX)
- If you have losses on the managed account, harvest the losses and shift into tax efficient investments. This would give you years of income reduction into the future and help you offset capital gains when you sell your taxable holdings.
- Wellesley Income fund is an excellent fund but it is not tax efficient and should not be held in taxable accounts.
You indicated that your wife is working but I do not see a 401k for her. If she has access to 401k, she should consider making max contributions to the 401k so you can grow your tax advantaged space. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cardude
Joined: 03 Aug 2009 Posts: 25
|
Posted: Thu Aug 13, 2009 9:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | You have done an exceptionally good job of saving up a retirement portfolio. Are you, or were you before you retired, an entrepreneur? |
Thanks for all the thoughtful responses and questions!
Yes, I owned my own small business for the last 17 years. Made good money, saved most of it, but also took big risks to get there. That risk profile bled over to my investing, and it all worked out pretty well while I had income coming in to cover up my mistakes . Now that I'm living off the portfolio I'm realizing that I don't have room to make the big mistake (country song?) anymore, so I'm trying to rethink things.
| Quote: | | Here is a question: would you buy that managed small cap account today, if you hadn't owned it previously? |
No, I would not buy it. Fee is too high and many of their bets blew up on them. They had a really good track record, but totally missed the severity of this big correction and were not positioned well. I'm sure many deep value guys got killed, but many didn't. Buffett was able to take advantage of the panic; these guys were part of the panic.
The account is being systematically liquidated as we speak. They are selling into this recovery and I am removing the cash and not letting them reinvest, but at this rate it could take years. At some point (when I get a plan) I will just tell them to sell it all I guess. It has generated ST losses of 17K and LT of 193K this year so I have some offsets to work with when I start selling some Berkshire.
| Quote: | When you say you are withdrawing 3%, do you mean 3% of the whole portfolio, or 3% of your cash position? Berkshire is an excellent company, and if your income needs are small enough relative to your whole portfolio, maybe you can afford the risk. But think of the other side of the equation. How much will your life really be improved by keeping BRK, instead of a more diversified portfolio, even if BRK outperforms the diversified portfolio?
|
3%, or less, of the whole portfolio. My life is not improved that much by keeping Berkshire, although it is fun to follow the company and I used to go to all the meetings but not anymore. It was a very tax efficient investment for me over the years, and towards the end I had a good idea when to buy and sell it, and still do. The nice thing is if I get a good plan I will know what to do with the Berkshire when it hits my sell point. My idea with keeping Berkshire as a core poistion is I would sell it when I got a good price and put the proceeds into my surrounding group of cheap, safer, diversified investments (cash, bond funds, index funds). Eventually, all the Berkshire would theoretically go away once the price hit the target, and then I would be fully into more diversified investments. I would have to sell the Berkshire at the right price for it to make sense in other words, and it will happen (my target price-- book value plus float-- has been hit almost once a year). I can live with the increased risk profile for awhile while I wait to sell it as long as I have a good plan where to put the proceeds. I don't feel like this is behavorial finance-type flaw, but more just getting what it's worth like when you sell a good used car that you know is worth X (which was my business btw).
My big problem is setting up the surrounding group of funds as I sell off the Berkshire, because I don't know what I'm doing once I get off my one trick pony. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cardude
Joined: 03 Aug 2009 Posts: 25
|
Posted: Thu Aug 13, 2009 9:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | To paraphrase Larry Swedroe, you seem to want to keep playing a game that you've already won. Here's a link to Larry Swedroe's blog article How do you know when you have enough?. It's a 4 part series. Please follow the links at the bottom of the article.
The rest of the portfolio is not set for tax efficiency. Please see Principles of Tax-Efficient Fund Placement on the Bogleheads Wiki.
You're looking for 70/30 AA but only have 4.5% tax advantaged space. Considering filling the tax advantaged space with taxable bond funds first, then use tax exempt bond funds in taxable accounts to complete bond allocation.
- Shift all tax advantaged accounts to fixed income investments (Inflation Protected Securities VIPSX/VAIPX or Total Bond Market VBMFX/VBTLX)
- If you have losses on the managed account, harvest the losses and shift into tax efficient investments. This would give you years of income reduction into the future and help you offset capital gains when you sell your taxable holdings.
- Wellesley Income fund is an excellent fund but it is not tax efficient and should not be held in taxable accounts.
|
Actually, I feel like I have won and DON'T want to play anymore, that's why I'm trying to change things . I will reduce the Berkshrie and shift it to a good AA of funds, but I have to do it at the right price so it could take awhile.
You're right, my portfolio is not tax efficient other than the Berkshire, and I didn't do a good enough job funding tax deferred investments when I was working. One reason was I made most of my money in a short time and couldn't put much of it in tax deferred stuff.
| Quote: | | You indicated that your wife is working but I do not see a 401k for her. If she has access to 401k, she should consider making max contributions to the 401k so you can grow your tax advantaged space. |
She is a teacher and will have a small retirement pension. I don't think teachers can do 401Ks, but she did have a 403B at one point. I may be all wet on this however.
| Quote: | - Shift all tax advantaged accounts to fixed income investments (Inflation Protected Securities VIPSX/VAIPX or Total Bond Market VBMFX/VBTLX)
- If you have losses on the managed account, harvest the losses and shift into tax efficient investments. This would give you years of income reduction into the future and help you offset capital gains when you sell your taxable holdings.
- Wellesley Income fund is an excellent fund but it is not tax efficient and should not be held in taxable accounts. |
Thanks for all the recomendations on where to shift funds to. Like you said, I don't have much tax deffered account money to work with, so how do I get around that? So I should sell the Wellesley since it's in the wrong type of account, and use the proceeds to fund a tax efficient index fund? What funds would you set up if you were me, and you were going to sell off the Berkshire and use the proceeds to diversify?
Thanks again. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
gw
Joined: 28 May 2009 Posts: 646
|
Posted: Thu Aug 13, 2009 10:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
Expenses....
1% of $1M costs about $10,000/year more than a cheap index fund. That's huge, and all the evidence says managers don't add value---don't be confused by the extremely rare example of Buffett. Expenses, expenses, expenses.
What's the advantage of "selling into the recovery" or whatever it was, with the high-fee small-cap fund? If you like small caps for some reason, Vanguard has an index fund that charges more than a full percent less than your fund (ER 0.28%). What's it costing you to not switch, about $10K/year? That's like an extra 7% income tax. Plus, you'll probably decide at some point that small caps make no sense in your portfolio, so why not switch it to a broad index fund now?
I won't try to get into whether or not it makes sense for BRK to be such a big part of your portfolio---there are arguments both ways. But what about limiting it to half your stocks? Then, even if some very unlikely event wipes out BRK, the loss is somewhat contained. Together with your 70/30 plan, it suggests an elegantly simple goal for your portfolio:
35% BRK.x
35% VTSAX
30% VBTLX
It's simple, so you can enjoy your retirement, and it's extremely cheap, which is the only thing that matters after basic risk management. Remember to use the tax-advantaged accounts optimally (first bonds, then dividend-paying stocks).
Expenses, expenses, expenses.... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DSInvestor
Joined: 04 Oct 2008 Posts: 2679
|
Posted: Thu Aug 13, 2009 11:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hi Cardude,
OK, you have indicated that you'd like to have 70/30 AA. Have you given any thought to how much foreign stock you'd like to have? Vanguard recommends 20-40% of stocks. For this example, I'll go down the middle of Vanguard's recommendations and use 30%.
As long as your wife has earned income, you can grow your tax advantaged space by maxing out your 403b (16.5K/yr or 22K if over age 50) and His and Her ROTH-IRAs (5K/yr each or 6K if over age 50)
If you plan on staying in your house for the long term, consider paying it off with the money that you have in the taxable account. The mortgage simply increases your fixed expenses and increases the amount that you need to withdraw from the retirement portfolio. How big is the 5.125% mortgage?
In this example, I will assume that all other stocks, value funds and managed, have been liquidated. This is not a recommendation but simply to show you what it could look like for max simplicity. It will at least show you how to set up the fixed income side using a combination of TIPS fund in tax advantaged accounts and Tax exempt bond fund in taxable accounts.
Taxable:
0% Money Market Fund to collect dividends (Tax Exempt MMF or Prime MMF)
5.4% Angel Investments locked up for 5 yrs (counts as US stocks)
44.5% Total Stock Market Index VTSAX er=0.09% - US Stocks
21% FTSE All World ex-US VFWIX er=0.40% or VEU ETF share class er=0.25% - Foreign stocks
23.6% Intermediate Term Tax Exempt Bond Admiral VWIUX er=0.12% - completes bond AA using tax efficient bond fund.
Her 403b:
0% Inflation Protected Securities VIPSX er=0.25% or VAIPX er=0.12%
His Trad IRA Vanguard 3.6% (1.1% plus 2.5% rollover):
3.6% Inflation Protected Securities VIPSX er=0.25% or VAIPX er=0.12%
Her Trad IRA Vanguard 0.8%:
0.8% Inflation Protected Securities VIPSX er=0.25% or VAIPX er=0.12%
His ROTH-IRA:
0% Inflation Protected Securities VIPSX er=0.25%
Her ROTH-IRA:
0% Inflation Protected Securities VIPSX er=0.25%
Total=100%
Portfolio re-balancing will need to be done in the taxable account since that's where you hold both stocks and bonds. To reduce the number of fund sales which trigger capital gains events, you may want to consider not reinvesting dividends in the taxable holdings. You can direct all dividends to a money market fund for spending and re-balancing.
Dividends in taxable accts: Direct to MMF
Dividends in tax advantaged accounts: Re-invest
New Contributions:
403b: $16,500 to Inflation Protected Securities
His ROTH-IRA: $5,000 to Inflation Protected Securities
Her ROTH-IRA: $5,000 to Inflation Protected Securities
Taxable: unknown amount.
Where will the money come from to build a 23.6% position in the Intermediate Term Tax exempt Bond fund?
| Code: | 16.5% Cash
18.3% managed account that is slowly turned into cash as it slowly recovers-- mostly small caps. 1% fee
2.4% Wellesley (VWINX) .23 exp ratio
1.6% Longleaf Internatonal (LLINX) 1.6 exp ratio
1.6% Third Ave Value (TAVLX) 1.11 exp ratio
0.6% conoco phillips (cop)
0.4% Wells Fargo (wfc) |
The above holdings add up to 41.4% and could be used to build the tax exempt bond position. The cash and Wellesley Income (60% bonds) are the closest match to fixed income so those are the 2 most obvious choices to start with.
GW makes a good point about expenses. VBTLX is an excellent taxable bond fund but it is not tax efficient and is best held in tax advantaged accounts. Intermediate Term Tax Exempt Bond fund VWIUX er=0.12 is a good tax efficient alternative to VBTLX for use in the taxable account.
I have included expense ratios for Investor and Admiral shares to show you expenses for each option. Admiral shares require minimum initial investment of $100K. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Lauren Vignec
Joined: 16 Feb 2008 Posts: 155
|
Posted: Fri Aug 14, 2009 11:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
| cardude wrote: |
My big problem is setting up the surrounding group of funds as I sell off the Berkshire, because I don't know what I'm doing once I get off my one trick pony. |
Hello Again,
Thank you for your detailed response--now I understand your situation.
I really think now would be a great time, if you have not done so already, to read through a couple of books about portfolio construction. Then you can find out more about how portfolios are built, and you will be able to see for yourself that there are really not that many component parts to a portfolio that are actually useful.
Many Bogleheads started learning portfolio construction from "All About Asset Allocation" by Rick Ferri. Any investing book by Larry Swedroe or William Bernstein will have what you need, and the Coffeehouse Investor by Bill Schulteis is a great book.
The funds DSInvestor has recommended would be excellent core funds for the portfolio. No matter how good a portfolio is, the investor has to stick with it to get the benefit. Just because someone is intellectually convinced doesn't mean they will stick with their portfolio, but it seems like that's where it starts. Most of us have to plow through at least one good book in order to become intellectually convinced, and then perhaps the behavior follows.
Best wishes,
L
Last edited by Lauren Vignec on Fri Aug 14, 2009 12:31 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
livesoft
Joined: 01 Mar 2007 Posts: 12536
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
YDNAL
Joined: 10 Apr 2007 Posts: 5778 Location: Biscayne Bay
|
Posted: Fri Aug 14, 2009 2:30 pm Post subject: Transitioning portfolio from accumulation to ER |
|
|
| Quote: | | Transitioning portfolio from accumulation to ER |
| cardude wrote: | Tax Rate: Federal -- 25% State of Residence-- TX
Age: 44
Desired Asset allocation: (stocks/bonds) 70/30
Intl allocation: 5%
Current portfolio : mid 7 figure portfolio size | cardude,
The asset allocation is driven by your personal situation with regards to risk. A couple of questions:
1) NEED... With a mid 7-fig portfolio, how much need do have?
2) ABILITY.... Assuming a $10M portfolio (mid 7-fig), invested $7M/$3M Stocks/Bonds, can you stomach a $3.5M or larger drop?
I suggest that you familiarize yourself with the following link and then select a couple of good books.
http://www.bogleheads.org/foru....php?t=6211 _________________ Landy
“The business schools reward difficult complex behavior more than simple behavior, but simple behavior is more effective.” - Warren Buffett |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cardude
Joined: 03 Aug 2009 Posts: 25
|
Posted: Fri Aug 14, 2009 3:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | The asset allocation is driven by your personal situation with regards to risk. A couple of questions:
1) NEED... With a mid 7-fig portfolio, how much need do have?
2) ABILITY.... Assuming a $10M portfolio (mid 7-fig), invested $7M/$3M Stocks/Bonds, can you stomach a $3.5M or larger drop?
|
I was not very clear with that mid 7 figure stuff-- it's actually low 7s I guess. It's just bouncing around 4M these days. Been as high as 5M not to long ago, and as low as 3M recently.
I didn't tell this part in my intro, but I'm just a dumb car guy who made some money, saved most of it, made a couple of decent investments, then got out of the car business recently.
Right now, with wife working and all the rentals full we are at a 2.5% "SWR". If my wife decided to quit her job (she just started back) and if all our rentals went vacant, then 3.3M is about as low as I could stand-- that's a 4% total portfolio withdrawal rate which I think is too big for 50 possible years of withdrawals.
When I quit I thought I was going to do this retirement thing with all Berkshire and some cash, but that doesn't sound very sophisticated, or safe either after everything fell to pieces recently and the portfolio dropped 40% from high to low. Then I started thinking I could use some of the Berkshire for the stock allocation, sell some Berkshire to put into ????, and sell all the other stuff and consolidate into ???.
So basically, I can stand a 15% drop, but not really a 40% drop. I did survive it, but it was pretty freaky. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ResNullius
Joined: 24 Oct 2007 Posts: 727
|
Posted: Fri Aug 14, 2009 3:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| DSInvestor wrote: | To paraphrase Larry Swedroe, you seem to want to keep playing a game that you've already won. Here's a link to Larry Swedroe's blog article How do you know when you have enough?. It's a 4 part series. Please follow the links at the bottom of the article.
. |
I always thought I was fairly smart, but I sure wish I had read these articles in October 2007. Our portfolio had reached a point where it offered us all we needed for the long haul, plus a very nice amount of cushion. We were 80% equities at the time. I moved the equities down to 70%, then decided to go another year before establishing a 60% fixed and 40% equity portfolio. My wife and I were already mostly retired, working a little part-time on the side. We're now 59. Well, the rest is history. We lost a ton in net asset value, but we didn't sell. On the way back up, we've been increasing the fixed asset allocation, which is now at 48% on it's way to 60%. I think I would have done things differently if I had read these articles, but I'll never know of course. Losing what you had in the bag is worse, I think, than never having had it in the bag. Well, we still have enough, but it would have been nice to have kept more of it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ozob
Joined: 28 Jul 2009 Posts: 179
|
Posted: Fri Aug 14, 2009 3:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I didn't retire quite so early as you did, but I do count 59 1/2 as a tad "early".
I moved a bit off the table and went heavily into fixed-income. It was counter-intuitive (I sold into the bear rally of the period), but it helped me sleep.
If you have done well, take a bit off the table, as I did. There's no shame in taking some profits.
O |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cardude
Joined: 03 Aug 2009 Posts: 25
|
Posted: Fri Aug 14, 2009 4:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I read the Swedroe articles, and I agree, and that's why I'm trying to figure out what to do. It really is hard giving up what's made you some money in the past, but I do need to trim it down some, and I will.
I like the simple AA that was posted earlier by GW because it's, um, simple and it may get me started:
35% BRK.x
35% VTSAX
30% VBTLX
As suggested by DSInvestor, I think I would substitute VWIUX for VBTLX since I don't have much tax advantaged room. Would it make sense to put our approx 5% in tax advantaged account money in VIPSX and reduce the VWIUX to 25%? And also, is the bond portion allocation where I put the cash? I would want to keep at least two years of expenses in cash to keep me happy. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
YDNAL
Joined: 10 Apr 2007 Posts: 5778 Location: Biscayne Bay
|
Posted: Fri Aug 14, 2009 4:22 pm Post subject: Transitioning portfolio from accumulation to ER |
|
|
| cardude wrote: | Desired Asset allocation: (stocks/bonds) 70/30
Intl allocation: 5% |
| cardude wrote: | | So basically, I can stand a 15% drop, but not really a 40% drop. I did survive it, but it was pretty freaky. |
| cardude wrote: | I read the Swedroe articles, and I agree, and that's why I'm trying to figure out what to do. It really is hard giving up what's made you some money in the past, but I do need to trim it down some, and I will.
I like the simple AA that was posted earlier by GW because it's, um, simple and it may get me started:
35% BRK.x
35% VTSAX
30% VBTLX | dude,
You're type A, eh? Slowdown........
A 15% portfolio drop limits the amount of Stock exposure (30% perhaps?).
Your desired asset allocation can't be 70/30 Stocks/Bonds if your ability to take risk is 15% - you have it backwards, should be more like 30/70 Stocks/Bonds.
Which is it? _________________ Landy
“The business schools reward difficult complex behavior more than simple behavior, but simple behavior is more effective.” - Warren Buffett |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cardude
Joined: 03 Aug 2009 Posts: 25
|
Posted: Fri Aug 14, 2009 4:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | Your desired asset allocation can't be 70/30 Stocks/Bonds if your ability to take risk is 15% - you have it backwards, should be more like 30/70 Stocks/Bonds. |
OK, if my wost cast scenario is not as bad and I figure I can take a 30% hit, can I get to a 50/50 bond stock AA? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
elgob.bogle

Joined: 29 Feb 2008 Posts: 264
|
Posted: Fri Aug 14, 2009 8:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Cardude Said "It really is hard giving up what's made you some money in the past, but I do need to trim it down some, and I will".
I am guessing that it was really hard to give up your business until you considered the possibilities of life without it. Now you are at another big turning point considering investment possibilities. I can tell you that I wish that I had taken piperwarrior's advice to move many stocks $$ to bonds when I was only 10% down in early 2008. Piperwarrior gave the same kind of good advice that you are getting now.
best regards,
elgob (formerly a millionaire because I was too stubborn to take good advice from the knowledgeable folks at this forum) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Lauren Vignec
Joined: 16 Feb 2008 Posts: 155
|
Posted: Sun Aug 16, 2009 1:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hello Again Cardude,
Umm...when I read your earlier response to my post I kind of...misread it. In fact, I basically got what you were saying backwards. So let me try again.
| cardude wrote: | | I'm just a dumb car guy who made some money, |
Actually, you are pretty smart. You are smart enough to know that you have way too much in a single stock, that your overall stock allocation is too high, and that angel investments and that small cap thing aren't necessarily in your best interests. If you didn't know these things you never would have posted here in the first place.
| cardude wrote: |
OK, if my wost cast scenario is not as bad and I figure I can take a 30% hit, can I get to a 50/50 bond stock AA? |
Here is a portfolio to "shoot for". This would be your portfolio after all the BRK, etc., is liquidated.
50% Fixed income
25% Total US
10% US Small Cap
15% Total International
The fixed income would be TIPS in the tax-advantaged accounts, and municipal bonds in the taxable accounts (and your cash position). I really like Vanguard's Limited Term fund (VMLUX) for municipal bonds. VFWIX and VTSAX for total US and total international, respectively. For the small caps Vanguard's tax-managed fund might be worth it instead of the index.
Here is the logic.
Small caps are riskier than large caps, which you just experienced in your managed accounts, and you notice there is a big chunk of international there, which includes emerging markets. However, the bonds are very low risk, low expected return. So you are creating a diversified portfolio where the stock side of the portfolio includes asset classes that are higher risk than the market, but where the bond side is extremely low risk. The result should be a portfolio with a little less than half the risk of the market, but with high enough expected returns to maintain your withdrawal rate indefinitely.
Also, I hope that investing in some riskier asset classes on the stock side will help you feel better about lowering the risk of your whole portfolio.
Check out the downloads on past withdrawal rates from this site:
http://bobsfiles.home.att.net/download.html#MWR
The past does not predict the future, but in the past 50/50 portfolios had very competitive withdrawal rates, given their lower risk. It's not a real fancy car, nothing to show off, but it gets pretty good gas mileage and doesn't require much maintenance.
Best wishes,
L |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
YDNAL
Joined: 10 Apr 2007 Posts: 5778 Location: Biscayne Bay
|
Posted: Sun Aug 16, 2009 2:19 pm Post subject: Transitioning portfolio from accumulation to ER |
|
|
| cardude wrote: | | YDNAL wrote: | | Your desired asset allocation can't be 70/30 Stocks/Bonds if your ability to take risk is 15% - you have it backwards, should be more like 30/70 Stocks/Bonds. |
OK, if my wost cast scenario is not as bad and I figure I can take a 30% hit, can I get to a 50/50 bond stock AA? | Dude,
We've been all over the map with your NEED and ABILITY to take risk. OK, we'll run with a 30% max drop, despite the fact that I fail to see the NEED.
50% Fixed (TIPS, Munis - Admiral)
25% Total Stock Admiral (VTSAX)
5% US Small Value (VISVX) - no Admiral available
5% Europe Admiral (VEUSX)
5% Pacific Admiral (VPADX)
5% Emerging Admiral (VEMAX)
5% Foreign Small (VFSVX) - no Admiral available
50/50 Overall
60/40 US/International (I know you said 5% International, but I can't see that) _________________ Landy
“The business schools reward difficult complex behavior more than simple behavior, but simple behavior is more effective.” - Warren Buffett |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
livesoft
Joined: 01 Mar 2007 Posts: 12536
|
Posted: Sun Aug 16, 2009 2:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
This portfolio suggestion was posted on another forum that cardude visits:
| Quote: | So a $4MM portfolio all taxable might look like this:
$500K VTI
$500K VBR
$500K VEU
$500K VSS
$1000K Vanguard Total Bond Index or $1000K Vanguard Interm Term Tax Exempt, check your taxes
$1000K Vanguard Short Term Bond Index or $1000K Vanguard Short-Term Tax Exempt.
|
It doesn't seem too far off from portfolio suggestions here. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
pkcrafter
Joined: 04 Mar 2007 Posts: 3097 Location: CA
|
Posted: Mon Aug 17, 2009 11:34 am Post subject: mind shift |
|
|
cardude | Quote: |
It really is hard giving up what's made you some money in the past, but I do need to trim it down some, and I will |
This is a mind game. You have made your money, now it is time to shift from accumulation thinking to asset preservation and management thinking. And don't forget luck had a lot to do with your success with very high risk taking. Diversify your portfolio and limit your risk.
Paul _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|