Bogleheads Home Bogleheads
Investing Advice Inspired by Jack Bogle
 
  WikiWiki    FAQFAQ    SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

UK-based index funds?

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bogleheads Forum Index -> Investing - Theory, News & General
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
englishgirl



Joined: 01 Mar 2007
Posts: 506
Location: FL

PostPosted: Mon Sep 08, 2008 5:48 pm    Post subject: UK-based index funds? Reply with quote

It seems that there are quite a few non-US based people on the forum, so I thought I'd pick your brains.

When I left the UK I transferred my various pension plans into what is now known as a stocks and shares ISA. I seem to have two separate accounts - contracted out from SERPs and something else (not contracted out, presumably). They are both invested in the same fund, the Virgin UK Index tracker, as this was the only broad market index I could find at the time. The TER is 1%. Not only am I not happy at the high fee, it seems like it is also underperforming the index fairly significantly, so isn't even doing very well at being a tracker.

Now as time has passed, I see I can get a Fidelity FTSE all stock (UK) index tracker for a TER of 0.3% so I am thinking of switching. I think it may also help when I come to retire, as I will somehow need to transfer the money from the UK to the US and have thought vaguely that I could perhaps more easily buy, say, a Fidelity SPIA over this side of the pond if I am coming from a Fidelity fund over there.

From looking around the Fidelity website, the UK index seems to be the only low cost index fund that they offer. I'd prefer a broad European or other general foreign index if there was one.

[I've already asked Vanguard if I can transfer the ISA to them, and they said no.]

Questions:
1. Does anyone know of any other low cost index funds that are offered in ISAs?
2. It seems that I can't reregister the ISA fund, but have to sell up and transfer it. Does this trigger capital gains tax?
3. Anyone have any comments on Fidelity in the UK?
4. Anyone have any other comments for me? Seems like it is almost impossible to transfer the ISA to a US-based IRA but am I missing something?

Thanks!
_________________
Sarah
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
stratton



Joined: 04 Mar 2007
Posts: 7905
Location: Puget Sound

PostPosted: Mon Sep 08, 2008 6:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

www.ishares.eu for lots of ETFs.

Paul
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
englishgirl



Joined: 01 Mar 2007
Posts: 506
Location: FL

PostPosted: Mon Sep 08, 2008 6:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks Paul, I never thought about using ETFs because of the ISA wrapper (kind of like an IRA). But it seems like it might be possible. Have to do some more googling.
_________________
Sarah
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
TedSwippet



Joined: 04 Jun 2007
Posts: 238

PostPosted: Mon Sep 08, 2008 6:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Google "self-select ISA".
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
cjking



Joined: 30 Jun 2008
Posts: 805

PostPosted: Tue Sep 09, 2008 7:14 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Selftrade do a self-select ISA. Sippdeal do the equivalent for Pensions. (I doubt you transferred your pensions into an ISA, generally that's not possible.)

Among the ETF's, I like MSCI World which tracks the MSCI developed market index. It's effectively a world tracker fund with a charge of 0.5%. About 48% of its capitalisation is in US shares. If you combined it with the MSCI Emerging Markets tracker in the ratio 92% to 8% the combination would be even closer to being an all-world tracker fund.

If you're living in the US, note that your ISA dividends, interest and capital gains may be taxable there. If you actually have a UK pension account then there's less need to worry, as you will only be taxed on money you extract. (Though you may not be able to take 25% tax-free if tax-resident in the US when you take it.)

Choosing a Fidelity fund inside a UK account won't make any diffence to the ease of buying an annuity in the US.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
SamLJ



Joined: 11 Feb 2008
Posts: 181

PostPosted: Tue Sep 09, 2008 1:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I had a discussion recently with a friend regarding decent funds available in the UK. I think you can build a reasonably decent low(ish)-cost portfolio out of your choice of the following (expense ratios in brackets):

Equity Funds:
iShares MSCI Europe ex-UK (IEUX) (0.40)
iShares MSCI Europe (IMEU) (0.35)
iShares MSCI North America (INAA) (0.40)
iShares MSCI Japan (IJPN) (0.59)
iShares MSCI World (IWRD) (0.50)
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets (IEEM) (0.75)

Bonds:
iShares £ Index-Linked Gilts (INXG) (0.25)
iShares FTSE UK All Stocks Gilt (IGLT) (0.20)

Real Estate:
iShares FTSE EPRA/NAREIT UK Property Fund (IUKP) (0.40)
iShares FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Global Property Yield Fund (IWDP) (0.59)

I really like the Fidelity FTSE tracker for UK equities.

As already stated, be careful with the ISA if you're resident for tax purposes in the USA. The IRS does not recognize the tax-preferred status of ISAs. Also note that if you're no longer resident in the UK you cannot add new money to the ISA.

Hope this helps,
Sam
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
SamLJ



Joined: 11 Feb 2008
Posts: 181

PostPosted: Tue Sep 09, 2008 1:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Also, it looks like the expense ratio on the Fidelity fund should only be 0.1%, not 0.3%:
http://www.fidelity.co.uk/cgi-....id=0387532
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
cjking



Joined: 30 Jun 2008
Posts: 805

PostPosted: Tue Sep 09, 2008 1:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

My wife has the Fidelity fund in her Sipp, the official management charge is 0.1%, but the TER is 0.3%. The ETF figures are TERs, so should be compared to the Fidelity TER figure.

http://www.fidelity.co.uk/advi....nding.html
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Valuethinker



Joined: 11 May 2007
Posts: 12890

PostPosted: Tue Sep 09, 2008 3:26 pm    Post subject: Re: UK-based index funds? Reply with quote

englishgirl wrote:
It seems that there are quite a few non-US based people on the forum, so I thought I'd pick your brains.

When I left the UK I transferred my various pension plans into what is now known as a stocks and shares ISA. I seem to have two separate accounts - contracted out from SERPs and something else (not contracted out, presumably). They are both invested in the same fund, the Virgin UK Index tracker, as this was the only broad market index I could find at the time. The TER is 1%. Not only am I not happy at the high fee, it seems like it is also underperforming the index fairly significantly, so isn't even doing very well at being a tracker.

Now as time has passed, I see I can get a Fidelity FTSE all stock (UK) index tracker for a TER of 0.3% so I am thinking of switching. I think it may also help when I come to retire, as I will somehow need to transfer the money from the UK to the US and have thought vaguely that I could perhaps more easily buy, say, a Fidelity SPIA over this side of the pond if I am coming from a Fidelity fund over there.

From looking around the Fidelity website, the UK index seems to be the only low cost index fund that they offer. I'd prefer a broad European or other general foreign index if there was one.

[I've already asked Vanguard if I can transfer the ISA to them, and they said no.]

Questions:
1. Does anyone know of any other low cost index funds that are offered in ISAs?


Legal & General (L&G). Their UK fee is 0.5, their international funds are 0.75 or 1.0%.

A better option would be to get a discount broker's ISA (eg from Selftrade) and then buy iShares ETFs. You would get wider coverage at ERs of typically 0.5%.

iShares, Lyxor and Deutsche are the main ETF providers in Europe.

My Barlays stockbroker's account allows me to buy US ETFs as well.


Quote:

2. It seems that I can't reregister the ISA fund, but have to sell up and transfer it. Does this trigger capital gains tax?


It shouldn't. Capital gains in an ISA, even if you withdraw money from the ISA, are sheltered (from UK tax, can't speak to US tax!).

Quote:

3. Anyone have any comments on Fidelity in the UK?


Good service. Strong bias to active funds.

Quote:

4. Anyone have any other comments for me? Seems like it is almost impossible to transfer the ISA to a US-based IRA but am I missing something?

Thanks!


That impossibility of transfer would be my understanding as well. Your problem is whether the IRS recognises the ISA as a tax free wrapper: you could wind up paying US tax on gains in the ISA.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
wearethefall



Joined: 29 Jul 2007
Posts: 160

PostPosted: Tue Sep 23, 2008 4:35 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Here is a list of etfs listed on the lse:

http://www.londonstockexchange....oducts.htm

The db-x trackers USA etf has the cheapest TER at 0.3% for that area:

http://www.londonstockexchange....NINDEX.pdf
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
robyates



Joined: 05 Oct 2008
Posts: 27
Location: Arlington, MA

PostPosted: Sun Oct 05, 2008 4:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I have been looking at these two bond funds for my mother (who is UK based)

Bonds:
iShares £ Index-Linked Gilts (INXG) (0.25)
iShares FTSE UK All Stocks Gilt (IGLT) (0.20)

I have also been looking at this one

iShares £ Corporate Bond (SLXX) (0.20)

The thing that worries me a little is their duration for example when I look up the fund's details at the ishares website (tried to post link, but this is my first post so it won't let me)

I see this

Weighted avg maturity (years) 20.35
Weighted avg coupon (%) 6.41
Macaulay duration 6.87
Modified duration 6.44

The durations / maturities have always confused me and I am not sure which one governs how sensitive it is to interest rate changes. I want to make sure that I have her in intermediate term bonds and not long term bonds. Can someone let me know whether these bond funds are long term or intermediate term?

In addition I would be interested in opinions as to the following portfolio for her. She is 63, is retired, and has a good pension that she can live off. She rarely if ever dips into her investments.

35% iShares £ Index-Linked Gilts (INXG)
17% iShares FTSE UK All Stocks Gilt (IGLT)
18% iShares £ Corporate Bond (SLXX)
25% iShares MSCI World (IWRD)
5% iShares MSCI Emerging Markets (IEEM)

Thanks,

Rob

p.s. does anyone understands which of these funds benefit the most from being in a self-select ISA or doesn't it matter?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Valuethinker



Joined: 11 May 2007
Posts: 12890

PostPosted: Sun Oct 05, 2008 4:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

robyates wrote:
I have been looking at these two bond funds for my mother (who is UK based)

Bonds:
iShares £ Index-Linked Gilts (INXG) (0.25)
iShares FTSE UK All Stocks Gilt (IGLT) (0.20)

I have also been looking at this one

iShares £ Corporate Bond (SLXX) (0.20)

The thing that worries me a little is their duration for example when I look up the fund's details at the ishares website (tried to post link, but this is my first post so it won't let me)

I see this

Weighted avg maturity (years) 20.35
Weighted avg coupon (%) 6.41
Macaulay duration 6.87
Modified duration 6.44

The durations / maturities have always confused me and I am not sure which one governs how sensitive it is to interest rate changes. I want to make sure that I have her in intermediate term bonds and not long term bonds. Can someone let me know whether these bond funds are long term or intermediate term?


Modified duration. +1% in interest rates = mod duration X 1% fall in bond price.

On the corporate bond ETF I dug into it and discovered a lot of corporate bonds from financial issuers. I then backed away slowly, keeping my gun on it at all times Wink.

Quote:

In addition I would be interested in opinions as to the following portfolio for her. She is 63, is retired, and has a good pension that she can live off. She rarely if ever dips into her investments.

35% iShares £ Index-Linked Gilts (INXG)
17% iShares FTSE UK All Stocks Gilt (IGLT)
18% iShares £ Corporate Bond (SLXX)
25% iShares MSCI World (IWRD)
5% iShares MSCI Emerging Markets (IEEM)

Thanks,

Rob

p.s. does anyone understands which of these funds benefit the most from being in a self-select ISA or doesn't it matter?


Bond funds in the ISA-- interest doesn't pay tax in an ISA, dividends outside an ISA get a 10% tax credit, and capital gains are only at 18% (and only when you sell).

Given her lack of need for income, I would delete the corporate bond fund at this point, and wait until credit conditions were more normal. Is there not a short term gilt ETF you could use instead (also check Lyxor, and DB etfs)?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
robyates



Joined: 05 Oct 2008
Posts: 27
Location: Arlington, MA

PostPosted: Sun Oct 05, 2008 5:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Many Thanks ValueThinker, to be clear I am not looking to move into this position immediately as it will take a while to get her assets freed up from her current investments. I plan on doing nothing with the current market crazyness and it will be December at the earliest before any money starts to move over.

As a long term position for her, however, does the portfolio make sense (I will increase the bond allocation as she gets older)?

Also, I have been looking and looking for a short term bond etf / fund in the UK and I can't find one open to individual investors. If anyone can find one I would be very interested.

Finally, given your comment on duration, does that imply that these are intermediate term bond funds and not long funds?

Thanks,

Rob
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Valuethinker



Joined: 11 May 2007
Posts: 12890

PostPosted: Sun Oct 05, 2008 5:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

robyates wrote:
Many Thanks ValueThinker, to be clear I am not looking to move into this position immediately as it will take a while to get her assets freed up from her current investments. I plan on doing nothing with the current market crazyness and it will be December at the earliest before any money starts to move over.

As a long term position for her, however, does the portfolio make sense (I will increase the bond allocation as she gets older)?

Also, I have been looking and looking for a short term bond etf / fund in the UK and I can't find one open to individual investors. If anyone can find one I would be very interested.

Finally, given your comment on duration, does that imply that these are intermediate term bond funds and not long funds?

Thanks,

Rob


Rob

Yes probably more of a medium term fund. It's hard to get duration over 10 years in bond funds, in any case. You don't really gain much by going 'long' in a bond market (except for index-linked bonds).

I haven't seen a ST bond ETF although I misthought ishares did one. Not Lyxor? Other big provider is DB.

The portfolio makes sense to me. I wouldn't be in too great a hurry to switch out of stocks, given her long run risk is inflation (although her pension is probably indexed). However lots of indexed linked is a good thing (albeit the real yields are low).
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
robyates



Joined: 05 Oct 2008
Posts: 27
Location: Arlington, MA

PostPosted: Sun Oct 05, 2008 7:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Valuethinker,

iShares £ Index-Linked Gilts (INXG) has the following durations

Weighted avg maturity (years) 15.94
Weighted avg coupon (%) 2.23
Macaulay duration 13.45
Modified duration 13.39

This seems like a fairly long bond. However, it is the inflation linked one. Is this suitable for a conservative portfolio of someone in retirement, given the long duration?

If inflation expectations abate by a single %age point will this fund loose 13% of its value? That seems fairly risky to me,

Rob
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bengt



Joined: 26 Mar 2008
Posts: 151

PostPosted: Sun Oct 05, 2008 7:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I've seen these international questions quite often here. I'm also quite interested in those and it would be nice to have them in the same place (in case you want to browse the past topics). I suspect 90% of members are not interested in these issues, so would it make sense to create a separate forum group for these issues? Perhaps "International Situations", "Investing Abroad", "Expat Investing", "Foreign Investing and Retirement" or something like it?

Also (or alternatively), are you aware of any such forum (elsewhere) that focuses on international investment situations (e.g. retirement accounts in two countries)?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Valuethinker



Joined: 11 May 2007
Posts: 12890

PostPosted: Mon Oct 06, 2008 4:16 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

robyates wrote:
Valuethinker,

iShares £ Index-Linked Gilts (INXG) has the following durations

Weighted avg maturity (years) 15.94
Weighted avg coupon (%) 2.23
Macaulay duration 13.45
Modified duration 13.39

This seems like a fairly long bond. However, it is the inflation linked one. Is this suitable for a conservative portfolio of someone in retirement, given the long duration?

If inflation expectations abate by a single %age point will this fund loose 13% of its value? That seems fairly risky to me,

Rob


Rob

Indexed linked bonds don't work like normal bonds. Duration is long because you get most of your money back at the end (buy at £100, redeem at £275, say, because of accumulated inflation). As we say in computing 'this is a feature, not a bug'. When you redeem you get back what you put in (whereas with normal long bonds, inflation has decimated that).

All you care about is the real post inflation money you get back. Which is basically fixed at about inflation + 1.5% when you buy the fund (at today's gilt yields).

If *real* interest rates move up by 1% then in principle the fund would lose NAV by about 15%. However if we look back at UK index linked gilts, they have never, AFAIK, moved by that much in any given year.

It's not nominal rates that matter, it's real.

Because UK pension funds and insurers gobble these things up, and sit on them, holding to maturity, the UK IL market is always 'short' of stock.

Since the main risk to bondholders in the long run is inflation, the long duration of the UK IL fund is not really an issue.

Yes we could have a 'down' year where the fund falls 10% in value (the normal situation for this is the economy is when the Bank of England is afraid of inflation, and raises interest rates sharply-- ie the opposite of where we are now). However *2* down years in a row of that scale is very unlikely (real interest rates of 3.5% would kill the British economy).

Whilst US (and Canadian) IL bonds have gone from 4% real yields down to 1.5% in my investing career, British IL have (I believe) hovered between 1.3% and 2%. They don't go down much, and they don't go up much. Just steady eddy.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
cjking



Joined: 30 Jun 2008
Posts: 805

PostPosted: Mon Oct 06, 2008 4:52 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

robyates wrote:

25% iShares MSCI World (IWRD)
5% iShares MSCI Emerging Markets (IEEM)


I like the idea of the MSCI world fund. I think I worked out that if you wanted to have a world index then the ratio between these two funds should be 92%:8% though. But maybe that's not what you're trying to do.

The other thing I would say, is that if you look at yields, the FTSE 100 tracker must be yielding nearly 4% at the moment. I might be tempted to get all my equity exposure from that, for the conceptual simplicity of being able to take significant income without having to sell shares.

I would like to know how much of a difference currency issues might make in choosing between the MSCI world index and the FTSE, as this is a choice I might need to make in future. Hopefully someone will have some thoughts.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Valuethinker



Joined: 11 May 2007
Posts: 12890

PostPosted: Mon Oct 06, 2008 5:28 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

cjking wrote:
robyates wrote:

25% iShares MSCI World (IWRD)
5% iShares MSCI Emerging Markets (IEEM)


I like the idea of the MSCI world fund. I think I worked out that if you wanted to have a world index then the ratio between these two funds should be 92%:8% though. But maybe that's not what you're trying to do.

The other thing I would say, is that if you look at yields, the FTSE 100 tracker must be yielding nearly 4% at the moment. I might be tempted to get all my equity exposure from that, for the conceptual simplicity of being able to take significant income without having to sell shares.


Hi.

If you look at the FTSE100, the big constituents (something like 60-70% of the total market cap-- EDIT that is almost certainly wrong, too high, maybe 40-50%?) are mines, energy companies (BP and Shell) and banks. And there is Vodafone which is gobally exposed to the consumer and pricing pressure.

In a global recessionary environment earnings for all 3 of those sectors will be under heavy pressure.

The FTSE100 currently yields about 4.5% I believe but it's not an attractive yield for those reasons.


Quote:

I would like to know how much of a difference currency issues might make in choosing between the MSCI world index and the FTSE, as this is a choice I might need to make in future. Hopefully someone will have some thoughts.


Global diversification is good, generally.

I think the models show the UK portfolio investor should be about 50% in sterling, for optimum diversification.

HOWEVER

your job and the equity in your house are in sterling. So that argues for a tilt away from sterling.

Beware the Euro-- this financial crisis could force its breakup. Italy in particular will struggle to stay in the Euro.


Last edited by Valuethinker on Mon Oct 06, 2008 6:41 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
TedSwippet



Joined: 04 Jun 2007
Posts: 238

PostPosted: Mon Oct 06, 2008 5:49 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I've been looking at doing something similar to this portfolio myself. MSCI World Index alone, at just a shade under 50% US, seemed a bit too US-centric for my tastes, though. It's probably perfect if you live in the US, but I want some home-country bias and less currency risk.

At the moment, I'm considering either blending FTSE and MSCI World Index, or slice-and-dice across ETFs for UK, US, EU ex UK, Japan, FE ex Japan, and EM. IWRD seems to be very thinly traded -- even given ETF arbitrage and so on, could this be a concern?

VT, thanks for your comments on INXG durations. The 15+ years thing had been bothering me too, but I think I now have a better handle on it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Valuethinker



Joined: 11 May 2007
Posts: 12890

PostPosted: Mon Oct 06, 2008 6:40 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Valuethinker wrote:
cjking wrote:
robyates wrote:

25% iShares MSCI World (IWRD)
5% iShares MSCI Emerging Markets (IEEM)


I like the idea of the MSCI world fund. I think I worked out that if you wanted to have a world index then the ratio between these two funds should be 92%:8% though. But maybe that's not what you're trying to do.

The other thing I would say, is that if you look at yields, the FTSE 100 tracker must be yielding nearly 4% at the moment. I might be tempted to get all my equity exposure from that, for the conceptual simplicity of being able to take significant income without having to sell shares.


Hi.

If you look at the FTSE100, the big constituents (EDIT this is wrong: something like 60-70% of the total market cap-- the actual number must be much lower) are mines, energy companies (BP and Shell) and banks. And there is Vodafone which is gobally exposed to the consumer and pricing pressure.

In a global recessionary environment earnings for all 3 of those sectors will be under heavy pressure.

The FTSE100 currently yields about 4.5% I believe but it's not an attractive yield for those reasons.


Quote:

I would like to know how much of a difference currency issues might make in choosing between the MSCI world index and the FTSE, as this is a choice I might need to make in future. Hopefully someone will have some thoughts.


Global diversification is good, generally.

I think the models show the UK portfolio investor should be about 50% in sterling, for optimum diversification.

HOWEVER

your job and the equity in your house are in sterling. So that argues for a tilt away from sterling.

Beware the Euro-- this financial crisis could force its breakup. Italy in particular will struggle to stay in the Euro.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Valuethinker



Joined: 11 May 2007
Posts: 12890

PostPosted: Mon Oct 06, 2008 6:42 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

TedSwippet wrote:
I've been looking at doing something similar to this portfolio myself. MSCI World Index alone, at just a shade under 50% US, seemed a bit too US-centric for my tastes, though. It's probably perfect if you live in the US, but I want some home-country bias and less currency risk.

At the moment, I'm considering either blending FTSE and MSCI World Index, or slice-and-dice across ETFs for UK, US, EU ex UK, Japan, FE ex Japan, and EM. IWRD seems to be very thinly traded -- even given ETF arbitrage and so on, could this be a concern?

VT, thanks for your comments on INXG durations. The 15+ years thing had been bothering me too, but I think I now have a better handle on it.


This is more or less where i have come out. ISAs are with L&G which have higher expense ratios.

Not sure on ETF point, I guess I am prepared to take the risk for smaller amounts of the total allocation.

International small cap is the pain in the neck one: the FTSE indices are all big cap.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
wearethefall



Joined: 29 Jul 2007
Posts: 160

PostPosted: Mon Oct 06, 2008 10:17 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Valuethinker wrote:


International small cap is the pain in the neck one: the FTSE indices are all big cap.


iShares have small cap funds for:

Europe Ex-UK
USA
Japan
Far East Ex-Japan

With expenses in the 0.4-0.7% range.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
robyates



Joined: 05 Oct 2008
Posts: 27
Location: Arlington, MA

PostPosted: Mon Oct 06, 2008 9:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

One more thing and then I think I am done.

A 'financial advisor' in the UK recently recommended my mother invest in RBS Capital Protected Investment (again, would post link but can't). They stated that this was guaranteed by the FSA.

I have searched all over the FSA site and can't find anything and this smells very fishy to me. I can't believe that the government would back a risky investment such as this, does anyone know if this kind of investment comes with any kind of government backing?

Thanks,

Rob
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Valuethinker



Joined: 11 May 2007
Posts: 12890

PostPosted: Tue Oct 07, 2008 3:14 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

robyates wrote:
One more thing and then I think I am done.

A 'financial advisor' in the UK recently recommended my mother invest in RBS Capital Protected Investment (again, would post link but can't). They stated that this was guaranteed by the FSA.

I have searched all over the FSA site and can't find anything and this smells very fishy to me. I can't believe that the government would back a risky investment such as this, does anyone know if this kind of investment comes with any kind of government backing?

Thanks,

Rob


It does not.

Or it should not. All the FSA means is that it has been approved by the FSA for sale to individual customers-- that doesn't mean it is a good investment.

What is guaranteed is your first £50k of deposits with RBS. After that, you are on your own.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
wearethefall



Joined: 29 Jul 2007
Posts: 160

PostPosted: Mon Oct 13, 2008 10:48 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

At the moment I'm considering going with a combination of:

Fidelity Moneybuilder UK index (0.28%)
db x-trackers World Ex-UK (0.4%)

The nice feature of the db-x ETF is I get all my international large and midcap in one fund with a competitive ER. It has about 17 million in assets under management so I'm hoping the spreads won't be too large. I can't find any info on the country % breakdown is but I guess I could work that out from the index.

I'll then use the iShares foreign smallcap ETFs for a bit more diversification.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
TedSwippet



Joined: 04 Jun 2007
Posts: 238

PostPosted: Mon Oct 13, 2008 11:40 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Worth noting that iShares use full replication to track indices, whereas DB and Lyxor use synthetic replication.

So far, it seems neither method is proven beyond doubt to be either better or worse. Reading around got me to a document comparing Lyxor to iShares; Lyxor had lower tracking error, but iShare's tracking error was positive.

Personally I feel a bit more comfortable with full replication; if I buy a basket of shares I'd like it to contain actual shares. This could however just be because I haven't taken the time to understand how synthetic replication works in practice.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
englishgirl



Joined: 01 Mar 2007
Posts: 506
Location: FL

PostPosted: Mon Oct 13, 2008 2:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Interesting discussion, guys.

I still haven't moved my Virgin fund, so it's good to see what the choices are out there. Valuethinker - you're a wealth of information!
_________________
Sarah
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
stratton



Joined: 04 Mar 2007
Posts: 7905
Location: Puget Sound

PostPosted: Mon Oct 13, 2008 3:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

TedSwippet wrote:
Worth noting that iShares use full replication to track indices, whereas DB and Lyxor use synthetic replication.

Are they?

In the US iShare are *not* full replication. For example iShares MSCI Emerging Markets (EEM) only has ~350 stocks. Whereas Vanguards EM fund (VWO) which follows the same MSCI EM index has ~800 stocks.

Paul
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
TedSwippet



Joined: 04 Jun 2007
Posts: 238

PostPosted: Mon Oct 13, 2008 4:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Are they?


Good question. The Lyxor, DB, and iShare comparisons I'd read specifically looked at UK indices. The FTSE-100 iShare currently holds 102 stocks, and the FTSE-250 254 stocks.

Looking at the MSCI Emerging Markets iShare, however, reveals it currently holds 344 stocks, so it's probably the same composition as the US version you mention.

Curiousity piqued, I took a look at the Fidelity Moneybuilder UK Index holdings. 519 holdings. And perhaps surprisingly, around 19% cash.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
stratton



Joined: 04 Mar 2007
Posts: 7905
Location: Puget Sound

PostPosted: Mon Oct 13, 2008 4:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

TedSwippet wrote:
Quote:
Are they?


Good question. The Lyxor, DB, and iShare comparisons I'd read specifically looked at UK indices. The FTSE-100 iShare currently holds 102 stocks, and the FTSE-250 254 stocks.

Looking at the MSCI Emerging Markets iShare, however, reveals it currently holds 344 stocks, so it's probably the same composition as the US version you mention.

Curiousity piqued, I took a look at the Fidelity Moneybuilder UK Index holdings. 519 holdings. And perhaps surprisingly, around 19% cash.

I imagine that single country large cap indexes are probably fully populated. A US S&P 500 fund in the UK is probably fully populated. iShares EAFE fund might even be fully populated in the UK version while the US version contains 500 stocks. The equivalent from Vanguard is probably around 1200 stocks.

Paul
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
wearethefall



Joined: 29 Jul 2007
Posts: 160

PostPosted: Mon Oct 13, 2008 5:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The cash in the Moneybuilder represents derivatives.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
captain3d



Joined: 10 Apr 2008
Posts: 29

PostPosted: Sun Nov 02, 2008 7:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi UKers

I am a Brit living in the US and generally follow index fund type investing. I had a long talk with my retired UK parents this morning after they complained about their Abbey (Inscape) investments losing so much money.

As they are both in their 70's I was shocked to see that their Abbey 'advisor' had responded to their request for a conservative approach with a 75% stock 25% bond portfolio!

What idiotic advise was that? On various correspondence this is referred to as a 'Preserve Real Wealth' investment.

I have since been trying to find out what other fees might be involved with this. Anyone familiar with this?

Are there any front of back end fees? Sounds like they are paying around 1% per year which is not terrible.

Sounds like a bit of self trade is in their future.

cheers...phil
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
robyates



Joined: 05 Oct 2008
Posts: 27
Location: Arlington, MA

PostPosted: Sun Nov 02, 2008 11:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Phil,

for what it's worth I have set my mum up with Halifax's Sharebuilder for her taxable stuff (still can't post links, so google 'Halifax Sharebuilder')

This works well as we will gradually be moving her portfolio into the allocations above and we can buy in at only 1 pound 50 per trade. Aside from that I don't believe there are any fees apart from the ETF's internal expenses which are somewhere between 0.2 and 0.5 %.

I am still investigating where to put the Self Select IRA's, suggestions welcome,

Rob
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
captain3d



Joined: 10 Apr 2008
Posts: 29

PostPosted: Mon Nov 03, 2008 1:17 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks Rob. I will look into that...


http://www.halifax.co.uk/share....uilder.asp
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
grumel



Joined: 30 Mar 2007
Posts: 1629
Location: Germany

PostPosted: Mon Nov 03, 2008 2:04 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

DBxtracker use solely swaps in their etfs. That means if Deutsche Bank goes bankrupt, up to 10%* of your money in the etf is gone.

My suggestion would be to take the spread of Deutsche Bank bonds to government bonds and muliply it with maybe 0,05 and add that amounth to the db expense ratio.

*The amounth can be between close to zero and 10%, got no idear about actual average swap exposure.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
wearethefall



Joined: 29 Jul 2007
Posts: 160

PostPosted: Mon Nov 03, 2008 10:33 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

grumel wrote:
DBxtracker use solely swaps in their etfs. That means if Deutsche Bank goes bankrupt, up to 10%* of your money in the etf is gone.

My suggestion would be to take the spread of Deutsche Bank bonds to government bonds and muliply it with maybe 0,05 and add that amounth to the db expense ratio.

*The amounth can be between close to zero and 10%, got no idear about actual average swap exposure.


So would the 0.3% ER on the db-x USA fund be pretty much equivalent 50 the 0.4% ER on the iShares USA etf?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
robyates



Joined: 05 Oct 2008
Posts: 27
Location: Arlington, MA

PostPosted: Wed Dec 17, 2008 6:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Valuethinker wrote:
robyates wrote:
One more thing and then I think I am done.

A 'financial advisor' in the UK recently recommended my mother invest in RBS Capital Protected Investment (again, would post link but can't). They stated that this was guaranteed by the FSA.

I have searched all over the FSA site and can't find anything and this smells very fishy to me. I can't believe that the government would back a risky investment such as this, does anyone know if this kind of investment comes with any kind of government backing?

Thanks,

Rob


It does not.

Or it should not. All the FSA means is that it has been approved by the FSA for sale to individual customers-- that doesn't mean it is a good investment.

What is guaranteed is your first £50k of deposits with RBS. After that, you are on your own.


Just to follow up on this, remarkably, I think this investment is covered by the government. I am now in the UK and have met with the financial advisors. A UK regulated organization, such as a bank, gets coverage from the FSCS (UK equivalent of FDIC) and they do cover investments like this. In no way do I think that this is a good investment and neither do the fools, but the details as to what compensation the FSCS provides is here and they do appear to cover this type of investment in the 'investments' coverage.

p.s. I am also finding out about insurance bonds which is where my mum currently has her investments. Incredibly these are also covered to a degree by FSCS as they count as insurance. The financial adviser, we met with today, failed to mention however the 5% commission that the linked to article mentions that they get for selling these. Does anyone have any further info on these, googling hasn't turned up much. Are they any good?
p.p.s. Does anyone want to write a boglehead guide for the UK investor with me? Smile This is as confusing as all hell and as far as I can make out my mum is getting ripped off left, right and center.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bogleheads Forum Index -> Investing - Theory, News & General All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group