| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
SoonerSunDevil

Joined: 19 Feb 2007 Posts: 2001 Location: The desert
|
Posted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 5:50 pm Post subject: My transfer to WellsTrade |
|
|
There have been several questions and threads regarding Wells Fargo's discount brokerage, WellsTrade. I moved from my previous broker exactly two weeks ago, and all of my positions are already showing in my WellsTrade accounts.
The customer service from Wells Fargo has been excellent, the execution speed with respect to purchasing ETFs has been great (saw a couple price improvements), and the selection of mutual funds available for purchase are outstanding.
I know many posters here have accounts with Vanguard and with Vanguard only. You might be wondering why I would open up a discount brokerage account, especially at a place other than Vanguard. Since I qualify for Wells Fargo's PMA Package, I get 100 free trades per year, per account. I have an individual account, Roth IRA, Traditional IRA, and soon enough I'll have to open a Rollover IRA account with them. I have 100 free trades per year for each of these three accounts. These free trades cover mutual fund, ETF, and stock transactions. I won't even come close to using 100 free trades, but it's nice to know that I have the ability to trade that often for free should the need (tax-loss harvesting) ever arise.
In my portfolio I have a mixture of funds from Vanguard, Dodge and Cox, Fidelity, and I hold a couple of ETFs. Instead of having an account with Vanguard, another with Fidelity, and another with Dodge and Cox, I am using WellsTrade (for free) for the simplicity of having all of my assets in one place.
Some posters have brought up the concern regarding the low interest rates paid by Wells Fargo on cash balances. It's quite simple to avoid earning a paltry rate of interest by placing an order to purchase Vanguard's Prime Money Market fund, ticker VMMXX. There's no fee for this, and after placing the trade, I have 99 more free trades left to use.
For those Bogleheads that are considering leaving their discount broker, I highly recommend WellsTrade. For those that are looking to open a brokerage account with cheap ETF trades, WellsTrade is free if you qualify for the PMA Package. Here are the details on the PMA package:
https://www.wellsfargo.com/investing/styles/wt/
I hope this post helps some Bogleheads who are considering WellsTrade.
John |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DaveTH

Joined: 05 Apr 2007 Posts: 2415
|
Posted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 5:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I have been using WellsTrade for nearly a year to dollar-cost average into ETFs. I use the Russell Institutional Money Market fund (RMMXX) for idle cash. I have been very pleased so far. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
livesoft
Joined: 01 Mar 2007 Posts: 9259
|
Posted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 6:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Did you notice how they even got all your purchases and dates for those assets that you transferred "in-kind"? This will be helpful when you need to know the cost basis when you sell. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Diver

Joined: 15 Nov 2007 Posts: 93
|
Posted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 7:38 pm Post subject: Re: My transfer to WellsTrade |
|
|
| OUJohnNasr wrote: | | I have an individual account, Roth IRA, Traditional IRA, and soon enough I'll have to open a Rollover IRA account with them. |
congrats on the move ! i made it about couple of months myself as well. do you need a separate rollover IRA ? can you rollover into existing IRA that you already have open ? i'm moving my existin IRA from another broker to WF and then planning on rolling over my current 401k into that IRA account. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
heyyou
Joined: 20 Feb 2007 Posts: 873
|
Posted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 8:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Diver,
Yes you can rollover into an existing traditional IRA. A rollover IRA is not really a subcategory of traditional IRAs, it is just a label to denote the origin of it since the balance is usually more than the limit for annual contributions. The IRS treats all traditional IRAs the same. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Diver

Joined: 15 Nov 2007 Posts: 93
|
Posted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 9:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| heyyou wrote: | Diver,
Yes you can rollover into an existing traditional IRA. A rollover IRA is not really a subcategory of traditional IRAs, it is just a label to denote the origin of it since the balance is usually more than the limit for annual contributions. The IRS treats all traditional IRAs the same. |
that's why i was wondering about the reason to opena rollover IRA if there is already an IRA account |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kal
Joined: 03 Mar 2007 Posts: 67 Location: Los Angeles
|
Posted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 10:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Did your previous broker charge you for the transfer? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SoonerSunDevil

Joined: 19 Feb 2007 Posts: 2001 Location: The desert
|
Posted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 10:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| livesoft wrote: | | Did you notice how they even got all your purchases and dates for those assets that you transferred "in-kind"? This will be helpful when you need to know the cost basis when you sell. |
Yes, I did notice this and I was pleasantly surprised. I think the WellsTrade website is slightly above average, but their record keeping is superb. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SoonerSunDevil

Joined: 19 Feb 2007 Posts: 2001 Location: The desert
|
Posted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 10:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| kal wrote: | | Did your previous broker charge you for the transfer? |
Yes, $50 per account. I wasn't too happy with this, but $50 isn't going to affect my accounts in a material fashion. Additionally, this fee was disclosed to me when I opened the accounts. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Peanut
Joined: 20 Feb 2008 Posts: 47
|
Posted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 11:20 pm Post subject: Question |
|
|
I know that some brokerage accounts charge you a transaction fee for buying a mutual and some don't, they usually list these for you. I used the link at WellsFargo to look up thier no transaction fee list of mutual funds. I noticed that Vanguard was not on that list. So, while you get one hundred free trades, there is still a transaction fee to be charged. So if you ever want to buy a new mutual fund with Vanguard through WellsFargo you will not pay a trade fee but you will pay a transaction fee.
Am I wrong?
-Peanut _________________ "One hundred men will test today, but only three, win the..." |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SoonerSunDevil

Joined: 19 Feb 2007 Posts: 2001 Location: The desert
|
Posted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 11:27 pm Post subject: Re: Question |
|
|
| Peanut wrote: | I noticed that Vanguard was not on that list. So, while you get one hundred free trades, there is still a transaction fee to be charged. So if you ever want to buy a new mutual fund with Vanguard through WellsFargo you will not pay a trade fee but you will pay a transaction fee.
Am I wrong?
-Peanut |
Yes, you are wrong
If a fund is listed as no-transaction fee at WellsTrade, that means it does not count against your 100 free trades. If a fund is available at WellsTrade but is considered a "transaction fee" fund, it will "cost" you one of your free trades. So long as you have at least one of your free trades left, you pay absolutely nothing for purchasing or selling one of these funds. If you do not have any free trades left, the trade will cost you $5.95. I really don't know how anyone would use more than 100 trades in 365 days, though.
I have made three separate purchases of Vanguard's Prime Money Market fund, and each purchase only cost me a free trade. I have 97 left
Hope this helps,
John |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Peanut
Joined: 20 Feb 2008 Posts: 47
|
Posted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 11:35 pm Post subject: Yes |
|
|
Yeah, that helps a lot. I use USAA and love them. But for whatever the reason Vanguard is not a no transaction fee company for them. But even with my free trades they still charge the transaction fee. I could not wrap my mind around it. They told me it is becuase they worked out a deal with the companies that they list as NTF and Vanguard was not one of them, hence, the TF. I like the way WellsFargo looks at it. Whether the compay charges a TF or not, if you have a free trade, then you pay nothing. I am goint to have to have a talk with USAA again and see about all this.
Thanks for the info.
-Peanut _________________ "One hundred men will test today, but only three, win the..." |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
indexfundfan

Joined: 20 Feb 2007 Posts: 608
|
Posted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 11:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I have the Wellstrade account for a little over a year and overall I have been pleased too. I just hope that the good things (i.e. the free trades) do not come to an end... _________________ My signature has been deleted. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SoonerSunDevil

Joined: 19 Feb 2007 Posts: 2001 Location: The desert
|
Posted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 11:39 pm Post subject: Re: Yes |
|
|
| Peanut wrote: | Yeah, that helps a lot. I use USAA and love them. But for whatever the reason Vanguard is not a no transaction fee company for them. But even with my free trades they still charge the transaction fee. I could not wrap my mind around it. They told me it is becuase they worked out a deal with the companies that they list as NTF and Vanguard was not one of them, hence, the TF. I like the way WellsFargo looks at it. Whether the compay charges a TF or not, if you have a free trade, then you pay nothing. I am goint to have to have a talk with USAA again and see about all this.
Thanks for the info.
-Peanut |
How much is the transaction fee? That sounds an awful lot like a commission to me. I would seriously consider opening up an account with Wells Fargo. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Peanut
Joined: 20 Feb 2008 Posts: 47
|
Posted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 11:44 pm Post subject: Yep |
|
|
Dude, your telling me. The transaction fee starts out at forty-five dollars and can increase with the amount of money you are using to purchase the fund. The more money the higher the fee can go up. The thing they told me though is that it is not them that charges it but Vanguard. They said they would rather have all NTF funds but not every company was willing to work out a deal or something. I will have to call during next working hours to find this out.
But thanks again for the tip about WellsFargo, I will definitely keep them in mind.
-Peanut _________________ "One hundred men will test today, but only three, win the..." |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Peanut
Joined: 20 Feb 2008 Posts: 47
|
Posted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 11:44 pm Post subject: Hey |
|
|
Oh yeah, by the way, Hook'em Horns!!! _________________ "One hundred men will test today, but only three, win the..." |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SoonerSunDevil

Joined: 19 Feb 2007 Posts: 2001 Location: The desert
|
Posted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 11:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| indexfundfan wrote: | | I have the Wellstrade account for a little over a year and overall I have been pleased too. I just hope that the good things (i.e. the free trades) do not come to an end... |
Like you, I do have some concern that the free trades might eventually come to an end. However, the PMA Package from Wells Fargo doesn't seem like a gimmick to me. I expressed my concerns that the free trades might go away one day to the local branch manager. He said that he would be very surprised if Wells Fargo eliminated the package with the free trades because of the amount of assets that they are attracting in their checking and savings accounts. He said that many customers are moving all of their financial services over to Wells Fargo.
Also, keep in mind that to get the free trades and services, a minimum of $25,000 is required. This makes me feel like the free trades will continue because we aren't subsidizing smaller accounts. I can't imagine Wells Fargo not making money off their customers with total balances of $25,000+. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SoonerSunDevil

Joined: 19 Feb 2007 Posts: 2001 Location: The desert
|
Posted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 11:45 pm Post subject: Re: Yep |
|
|
| Peanut wrote: | Dude, your telling me. The transaction fee starts out at forty-five dollars and can increase with the amount of money you are using to purchase the fund. The more money the higher the fee can go up. The thing they told me though is that it is not them that charges it but Vanguard. They said they would rather have all NTF funds but not every company was willing to work out a deal or something. I will have to call during next working hours to find this out.
But thanks again for the tip about WellsFargo, I will definitely keep them in mind.
-Peanut |
$45?!?!
I also think a USAA answer stating that Vanguard gets the $45 is bogus. Scottrade charges $17, Firstrade charges $9.95, and some others charge in the $10 - $20 range. USAA probably gets a rebate or percentage for the funds that are purchased on their NTF list, and the $45 fee for purchasing a Vanguard fund is making up for the lack of compensation from Vanguard.
Last edited by SoonerSunDevil on Sat Mar 22, 2008 11:49 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SoonerSunDevil

Joined: 19 Feb 2007 Posts: 2001 Location: The desert
|
Posted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 11:46 pm Post subject: Re: Hey |
|
|
| Peanut wrote: | | Oh yeah, by the way, Hook'em Horns!!! |
Vomit  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
pointyhairedboss

Joined: 02 Mar 2007 Posts: 204
|
Posted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 11:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | I have an individual account, Roth IRA, Traditional IRA, and soon enough I'll have to open a Rollover IRA account with them. |
Wells Fargo will not allow you to open two traditional ira accounts. I found out earlier this year when I was considering doing it. My reasons for doing it became moot when I discovered the 'whole IRA' cost basis rules. Wells Fargo would rather you rollover your assets into your existing IRA account. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
pointyhairedboss

Joined: 02 Mar 2007 Posts: 204
|
Posted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 11:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | Quote: | | The thing they told me though is that it is not them that charges it but Vanguard. They said they would rather have all NTF funds but not every company was willing to work out a deal or something. I will have to call during next working hours to find this out. |
I also think a USAA answer stating that Vanguard gets the $45 is bogus. |
I agree. This sounds slimy and dishonest. Yes, I'm sure that Vanguard would not agree to pay any shelf fees, which typically range from .25% to.35%. But the choice to charge $45 is all on the USAA end. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bounca

Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 692
|
Posted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 6:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
| pointyhairedboss wrote: | | Quote: | | I have an individual account, Roth IRA, Traditional IRA, and soon enough I'll have to open a Rollover IRA account with them. |
Wells Fargo will not allow you to open two traditional ira accounts. I found out earlier this year when I was considering doing it. My reasons for doing it became moot when I discovered the 'whole IRA' cost basis rules. Wells Fargo would rather you rollover your assets into your existing IRA account. |
I'm not clear on this. If I have a rollover IRA and two ROTHs, WF will just allow one of these IRAs? combine the two ROTHs?. What are my options if I choose to go to WF in this case. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
LH2004

Joined: 27 Mar 2007 Posts: 1745 Location: New York, NY
|
Posted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 8:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
| OUJohnNasr wrote: | | I can't imagine Wells Fargo not making money off their customers with total balances of $25,000+. | You can't?
What do you think the profit margin is to Wells Fargo on a dollar sitting in a Vanguard fund that they sold you for free? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
livesoft
Joined: 01 Mar 2007 Posts: 9259
|
Posted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 9:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
I can't imagine TDAmeritrade making any money off of my account.
I have a 6-figure account at TDAM of about 4 ETFs and 3 stocks. I have made no trades in 2 years. The day a dividend appears in my cash sweep account, it gets ACH-transferred out to my WF account, thus keeping my cash balance at TDAM at $0. TDAM should make a little money off the 'float', but that can't pay for the paperwork I get mailed from them each year (proxies, 1099s).
There must be some benefit to brokers to have customer assets. Maybe they can loan out my ETFs/stocks and that helps them? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Fantumzone
Joined: 24 Feb 2008 Posts: 120
|
Posted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 9:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
If I'm interpreting the wells fargo offer correctly, I can have 0$ in checking and savings, and 25K in say VMMXX in their brokerage, and qualify for their 100 free trades, is that correct ?
Also, on 100 free trades per account, do I need to have a seperate username etc for the different accounts, or is it like vanguard where there is one username, just seperate sub-accounts ?
This is because they say IRA accounts will be included in the 25k qualification.
My question then is, say I have 10k in VMMXX in taxable account, and 15k in VIPSX in roth IRA at wells fargo, and nothing in checking and savings, will I get 200 free trades (100/accnt) per year ? And those trades can be for money market funds ? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
livesoft
Joined: 01 Mar 2007 Posts: 9259
|
Posted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 9:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
I became a WF customer because of their fantastic checking account. Only later did I become a brokerage customer when trades were low cost, but not free. Then they switched to free trades.
It has been reported that folks who keep $1 in checking and have no transactions get their account closed due to inactivity.
As for all the accounts, we have several accounts at WF: joint brokerage, his IRA, her IRA, joint checking, daughter's checking/savings. All are absolutely free. Online, I can see the joint accounts and my IRA. I cannot see my spouse's IRA. This is identical to my Vanguard online setup.
In my IRA at WF, I have the VG GNMA fund. I get 100 free trades in that account, but I have used only 1: the initial one to buy the VG GNMA fund. I am not going to trade in my IRA and dividends are reinvested for free, so I am not going to use the remaining 99 free trades in that account. And next year, I am not going to use the 100 free trades in that account. In theory though, I could sell the VG GNMA fund and buy a VG money market fund which would use up 2 free trades.
So don't get wrapped up in 100 free trades. WF is certainly a great deal, but would it be a better deal if they gave you 1000 free trades or unlimited free trades? Would it be a worse deal if they gave you 50 free trades?
And finally, I encourage you to call them up directly and experience their customer support before you open an account. See if they can answer your questions to your satisfaction. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
pointyhairedboss

Joined: 02 Mar 2007 Posts: 204
|
Posted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 10:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | If I'm interpreting the wells fargo offer correctly, I can have 0$ in checking and savings, and 25K in say VMMXX in their brokerage, and qualify for their 100 free trades, is that correct ? |
You would probably need $1 in checking. Savings account would not be needed. There have been some stories of accounts being closed in activity, so once a year you may want to transfer in $1 and later transfer out $1 to keep it active.
| Quote: | Also, on 100 free trades per account, do I need to have a seperate username etc for the different accounts, or is it like vanguard where there is one username, just seperate sub-accounts ?
This is because they say IRA accounts will be included in the 25k qualification. |
One user name for all accounts including checking, optional savings, trad ira, roth ira, and taxable.
| Quote: | | My question then is, say I have 10k in VMMXX in taxable account, and 15k in VIPSX in roth IRA at wells fargo, and nothing in checking and savings, will I get 200 free trades (100/accnt) per year ? And those trades can be for money market funds ? |
You would probably need $1 in checking. But yes, 100 free trades per account, 200 free trades total. And yes, you can use those trades for non ntf money market funds. You could also invest in wells fargo money market funds. They would yield less but would not cost you a free trade. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
pointyhairedboss

Joined: 02 Mar 2007 Posts: 204
|
Posted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 11:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | I'm not clear on this. If I have a rollover IRA and two ROTHs, WF will just allow one of these IRAs? combine the two ROTHs?. What are my options if I choose to go to WF in this case. |
I know you can't have two traditional iras. I presume you can't have two roth iras, but i can't say for sure. So if I am right, in your instance, you would setup one traditional ira account and one roth ira account (which consist of the combined assets of your two roth iras currently). |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sammy_M

Joined: 25 Nov 2007 Posts: 795
|
Posted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 12:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| pointyhairedboss wrote: | | Quote: | | I'm not clear on this. If I have a rollover IRA and two ROTHs, WF will just allow one of these IRAs? combine the two ROTHs?. What are my options if I choose to go to WF in this case. |
I know you can't have two traditional iras. I presume you can't have two roth iras, but i can't say for sure. So if I am right, in your instance, you would setup one traditional ira account and one roth ira account (which consist of the combined assets of your two roth iras currently). |
I have a rollover IRA and a traditional IRA with Wellstrade. They encouraged me to just move the rollover $ into the traditional. I said no because the TIRA is non-deductible and I wanted to keep them separate in case I chose to do a conversion in 2010 (moving the Rollover money to a SE401k first). They had no problem keeping both accts once I explained this. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SoonerSunDevil

Joined: 19 Feb 2007 Posts: 2001 Location: The desert
|
Posted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 12:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| LH2004 wrote: | | OUJohnNasr wrote: | | I can't imagine Wells Fargo not making money off their customers with total balances of $25,000+. | You can't?
What do you think the profit margin is to Wells Fargo on a dollar sitting in a Vanguard fund that they sold you for free? |
If you would click on the link that I provided above, you would see that one requirement for having a PMA account at Wells Fargo is a checking account with them. One is free to keep as much or as little as they wish in the checking account. Personally, I like to keep a few thousand dollars (at least) in my checking account, and I'm earning next to nothing on this. Rest assured, Wells Fargo is making money off of me. Additionally, I received a good sales pitch regarding a savings account, opening a new credit card, etc. I respectfully declined those options, but I'm sure many more customers choose to open those accounts. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sammy_M

Joined: 25 Nov 2007 Posts: 795
|
Posted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 12:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I moved to Wellstrade recently and have been pleased for the most part. I did want to make others aware of one issue with transfering a PIMCO fund. I bought PCRIX at Vanguard BR where they have a $25k min. Before I decided to transfer my accts to Wellstrade I called them to make sure they could transfer it in because their minimum is $100k for this fund. I spoke with two people at Wellstrade who said it wouldn't be a problem. However, once I did the transfer -- It wouldn't go through b/c PIMCO would not let Wellstrade setup the acct to transfer into. I finally got in touch with someone at PIMCO and they made an exception. Just took tons of time (4-6hrs total) and wanted to warn others of this situation. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SoonerSunDevil

Joined: 19 Feb 2007 Posts: 2001 Location: The desert
|
Posted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 12:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Fantumzone wrote: | | If I'm interpreting the wells fargo offer correctly, I can have 0$ in checking and savings, and 25K in say VMMXX in their brokerage, and qualify for their 100 free trades, is that correct ? |
The PMA Account, which comes with the free WellsTrade goodies, must be opened with a checking account. There are no minimum requirements for the checking account. You could certainly have $25,000 in VMMXX and qualify for the free trades.
| Fantumzone wrote: | Also, on 100 free trades per account, do I need to have a seperate username etc for the different accounts, or is it like vanguard where there is one username, just seperate sub-accounts ?
This is because they say IRA accounts will be included in the 25k qualification. |
I have one username, and I have access to all of my accounts using one login name. The amount of free trades available is based on account number, not username.
| Fantumzone wrote: | | My question then is, say I have 10k in VMMXX in taxable account, and 15k in VIPSX in roth IRA at wells fargo, and nothing in checking and savings, will I get 200 free trades (100/accnt) per year ? And those trades can be for money market funds ? |
Yes, and yes. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Default User BR
Joined: 17 Dec 2007 Posts: 529
|
Posted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 3:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Fantumzone wrote: | | If I'm interpreting the wells fargo offer correctly, I can have 0$ in checking and savings, and 25K in say VMMXX in their brokerage, and qualify for their 100 free trades, is that correct ? |
Actually, you only need the PMA checking account to get the free trades. Where the $25k comes into play is that the PMA carries a $25 monthly fee if you have less than that in total assets. Also, if your mortgage happens to be with them (mine coincidentally was) 10% of the balance counts toward that figure.
Brian |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Default User BR
Joined: 17 Dec 2007 Posts: 529
|
Posted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 3:37 pm Post subject: Re: My transfer to WellsTrade |
|
|
| OUJohnNasr wrote: | | There have been several questions and threads regarding Wells Fargo's discount brokerage, WellsTrade. |
The only little bit of irritation that I had in opening a brokerage account was that WF hasn't quite fully embraced the electronic age. I wanted to fund the initial amount with an ACH, which was possible EXCEPT that they wanted me to send in a canceled check to verify ownership. I got around that by using an account with ACH "push" capability to put money in the checking account, then funding the brokerage from there.
Also, they required physically filling out and mailing in a couple of forms. It wasn't a huge deal, but somewhat annoying.
Brian |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
LH2004

Joined: 27 Mar 2007 Posts: 1745 Location: New York, NY
|
Posted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 3:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Sammy_M wrote: | | They encouraged me to just move the rollover $ into the traditional. I said no because the TIRA is non-deductible and I wanted to keep them separate in case I chose to do a conversion in 2010 (moving the Rollover money to a SE401k first). | I think you pulled a fast one on them. It doesn't matter which account you move the money into the 401(k) from, or whether they're combined or not. (The old "conduit IRA" rules were repealed at the same time that solo 401(k)'s became a useful possibility, so while some old big 401(k)'s have not been updated to allow rollovers from any IRA, I don't think any solo 401(k)'s should care.) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
expat
Joined: 10 Mar 2008 Posts: 180
|
Posted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 4:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Does the 100 free trade apply to their solo 401K plan too? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Kenster1

Joined: 28 Feb 2007 Posts: 2521
|
Posted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 5:29 pm Post subject: Re: My transfer to WellsTrade |
|
|
| Default User BR wrote: | The only little bit of irritation that I had in opening a brokerage account was that WF hasn't quite fully embraced the electronic age. I wanted to fund the initial amount with an ACH, which was possible EXCEPT that they wanted me to send in a canceled check to verify ownership. I got around that by using an account with ACH "push" capability to put money in the checking account, then funding the brokerage from there.
Also, they required physically filling out and mailing in a couple of forms. It wasn't a huge deal, but somewhat annoying.
Brian |
Yeah I understand what you're saying. Here's another example -- to setup or make any changes (dates, dollar amounts, etc) to automatic periodic investing, you can't do it online but you can fill-out and fax over a form. That's a bit of an antiquated method.
The only thing I wished is that WF was in Illinois because it can help having that physical relationship for anything needed.
Over in the in the M* forum -- a user mentioned that in order to make some account changes (can't remember exactly what it was) WF required him to physically go to their branch to valid identity or something like that -- and they had to drive across to another State to visit a WF branch. That's the only snafu issue that hopefully won't come up but it can when dealing with a bank. For example -- I know that some banks allow you to open a Savings account online but if you do not add your spouse upon the initial opening of the account with valid info then the only way to do it after account opening is to visit a branch with your spouse to validate identity to add the spouse as co-applicant on the Savings account (I'm not saying this is the case with WF with this specific example -- but I have heard of a case where a Wellstrade client was required to visit a branch for whatever account related modications or identity check they had to go thru.) _________________ SURGEON GENERAL'S WARNING: Any overconfidence in your ability, willingness and need to take risk may be hazardous to your health.
Last edited by Kenster1 on Sun Mar 23, 2008 5:40 pm; edited 3 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sammy_M

Joined: 25 Nov 2007 Posts: 795
|
Posted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 5:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| LH2004 wrote: | | I think you pulled a fast one on them. It doesn't matter which account you move the money into the 401(k) from, or whether they're combined or not. (The old "conduit IRA" rules were repealed at the same time that solo 401(k)'s became a useful possibility, so while some old big 401(k)'s have not been updated to allow rollovers from any IRA, I don't think any solo 401(k)'s should care.) |
Not sure if it matters, but these were transfers of existing accounts. I originally had the Rollover IRA with Vanguard BR. I added the non-deductible TIRA last year with no questions. Wellstrade took them both in the transfer without combining without much discussion, but I assume it was because they wanted my business. The math on the non-deductible TIRA conversion (should I chose to do it) just seems easier without combining the two. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
azap

Joined: 21 Feb 2007 Posts: 11 Location: Arizona
|
Posted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 5:44 pm Post subject: Does VMMXX held in a brokerage account have checkwriting? |
|
|
| I'm guessing that the answer is no, but I'm asking to be sure. If you hold Vanguard Prime Money Market in a WellsTrade account, do you get a checkbook to write checks from the account? I realize that you can transfer funds to your Wells Fargo checking, but that would use up a trade. I'm considering starting a WellsTrade account, but I may need to maintain a money market account outside (or a Wells Fargo money market account within) to maintain checkwriting from the money market. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
tibbitts
Joined: 27 Feb 2007 Posts: 2463
|
Posted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 6:25 pm Post subject: only one traditional ira? |
|
|
I thought that to retail the capability to roll a rollover back into an employer plan, you had to maintain the funds in a separate ira account. So only one ira would not suffice for someone with multiple ira fund sources. Maybe someone can clarify.
Paul |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
paulob

Joined: 20 Feb 2007 Posts: 1097
|
Posted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 6:54 pm Post subject: Re: My transfer to WellsTrade |
|
|
| Kenster1 wrote: | | Over in the in the M* forum -- a user mentioned that in order to make some account changes (can't remember exactly what it was) WF required him to physically go to their branch to valid identity or something like that -- and they had to drive across to another State to visit a WF branch. That's the only snafu issue that hopefully won't come up but it can when dealing with a bank. |
I think that was my post. My son had already opened his IRA successfully. The PMA account was rejected due to "issues" with his social security number. So his social worked for the brokerage side but was flagged on the bank side for the PMA account. It wasn't until he moved 1,000 miles away that he was near a branch as WF required.
It has been a very satisfying 1st year relationship with WF. But, I would not trade my local (BOA) bank for WF until there is a local branch. _________________ Paul |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
LH2004

Joined: 27 Mar 2007 Posts: 1745 Location: New York, NY
|
Posted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 11:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Sammy_M wrote: | | The math on the non-deductible TIRA conversion (should I chose to do it) just seems easier without combining the two. | I don't see how. The non-taxable fraction of any conversion (or withdrawal) equals your total traditional IRA basis divided by your total traditional IRA assets. You need to know those 2 totals across all accounts, no matter how many accounts that is.
Basis is just the total amount of non-deductible contributions you've ever made or rolled over from a 401(k) or other plan, unless you have previously received any of those tax-free. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
schwarm
Joined: 28 Oct 2007 Posts: 542 Location: Lower Alabama
|
Posted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 10:47 am Post subject: Re: My transfer to WellsTrade |
|
|
| paulob wrote: | | Kenster1 wrote: | | Over in the in the M* forum -- a user mentioned that in order to make some account changes (can't remember exactly what it was) WF required him to physically go to their branch to valid identity or something like that -- and they had to drive across to another State to visit a WF branch. That's the only snafu issue that hopefully won't come up but it can when dealing with a bank. |
I think that was my post. My son had already opened his IRA successfully. The PMA account was rejected due to "issues" with his social security number. So his social worked for the brokerage side but was flagged on the bank side for the PMA account. It wasn't until he moved 1,000 miles away that he was near a branch as WF required.
It has been a very satisfying 1st year relationship with WF. But, I would not trade my local (BOA) bank for WF until there is a local branch. |
So you have to live near a WF branch to use the PMA account? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DaveTH

Joined: 05 Apr 2007 Posts: 2415
|
Posted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 11:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | So you have to live near a WF branch to use the PMA account? |
No. There are no Wells Fargo branches anywhere in my state and I still have a PMA account. I keep exactly $1 in the account and perform 1 transaction per year to keep it active and open. I did not really want or need another checking account, but the PMA link is required for the free trades. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
paulob

Joined: 20 Feb 2007 Posts: 1097
|
Posted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 11:57 am Post subject: Re: My transfer to WellsTrade |
|
|
| schwarm wrote: | | paulob wrote: | | Kenster1 wrote: | | Over in the in the M* forum -- a user mentioned that in order to make some account changes (can't remember exactly what it was) WF required him to physically go to their branch to valid identity or something like that -- and they had to drive across to another State to visit a WF branch. That's the only snafu issue that hopefully won't come up but it can when dealing with a bank. |
I think that was my post. My son had already opened his IRA successfully. The PMA account was rejected due to "issues" with his social security number. So his social worked for the brokerage side but was flagged on the bank side for the PMA account. It wasn't until he moved 1,000 miles away that he was near a branch as WF required.
It has been a very satisfying 1st year relationship with WF. But, I would not trade my local (BOA) bank for WF until there is a local branch. |
So you have to live near a WF branch to use the PMA account? |
No, it was a requirement to physically present ID for my son in order to open his account. I had opened another PMA account via mail. I won't be using the PMA as my prime bank account because I'm not interested in driving to Texas, etc. if I need to resolve another problem. _________________ Paul |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
schwarm
Joined: 28 Oct 2007 Posts: 542 Location: Lower Alabama
|
Posted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 12:29 pm Post subject: Re: My transfer to WellsTrade |
|
|
| paulob wrote: | | No, it was a requirement to physically present ID for my son in order to open his account. I had opened another PMA account via mail. I won't be using the PMA as my prime bank account because I'm not interested in driving to Texas, etc. if I need to resolve another problem. |
This makes me wonder if having an account with WF is worth it if there are no branches nearby. The closest to me is probably SE Texas, 500 mi away. Curiously, WF has a loan office in my town, but I don't think they handle banking/investment accounts. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
livesoft
Joined: 01 Mar 2007 Posts: 9259
|
Posted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 12:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I had a TDWaterhouse Bank checking account for almost a decade without having any branches nearby. I did all the traditional banking activities without having a place to walk into for that decade. I got a mortgage, refinanced a couple of times, etc. I would still be using this bank if they had not severed their relationship with Ameritrade.
The WF online brokerage account is not run out of the local WF offices. Indeed, the brokers in the local offices cater to folks who want hand-holding and pay high fees. If you go into the office and try to get help on the free-trade brokerage stuff, they will stick their noses up at you and kick you out on the curb.
But the PMA checking is not the brokerage. The folks in the local bank will do nice things for you if you have PMA checking. Nice things like free cookies, no holds on big checks, etc.
Anyways, IMHO one doesn't need a local bank in this modern age. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Kenster1

Joined: 28 Feb 2007 Posts: 2521
|
Posted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 1:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yes -- I guess Paulob was the example I was thinking of.
You should have no problems with Welltrade in using their service via fax, mail-in or phone orders. The problem is that to qualify for the 100 free trades, everything is tied to opening a PMA Bank account which is on the Well Fargo banking side of the business.
When Paulob's son ran into a snafu with trying to be added to the PMA bank account in order to qualify for the 100 free trades in Wellstrade -- WF bank asked him to visit a branch I guess to validate identity.
Most of the time everything should run smoothly with Wellstrade but am a bit concerned about little circumstances like this that Paulob's son ran into irregardless of whether you want to make use of your PMA bank account or not. _________________ SURGEON GENERAL'S WARNING: Any overconfidence in your ability, willingness and need to take risk may be hazardous to your health.
Last edited by Kenster1 on Mon Mar 24, 2008 2:01 pm; edited 2 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sammy_M

Joined: 25 Nov 2007 Posts: 795
|
Posted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 1:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| LH2004 wrote: | | Sammy_M wrote: | | The math on the non-deductible TIRA conversion (should I chose to do it) just seems easier without combining the two. | I don't see how. The non-taxable fraction of any conversion (or withdrawal) equals your total traditional IRA basis divided by your total traditional IRA assets. You need to know those 2 totals across all accounts, no matter how many accounts that is.
Basis is just the total amount of non-deductible contributions you've ever made or rolled over from a 401(k) or other plan, unless you have previously received any of those tax-free. |
I'm probably looking at this incorrectly but...
A few years ago I rolled out the 100% deductible contributions from my former employer's 401k to a Rollover IRA. I have no plans to convert this money to a Roth...so I plan to roll it to my newly formed SE401k, sometime before 2010.
Last year I started a non-deductible IRA. In 2010 (assuming tax code isn't changed by then) I'm planning to convert this to Roth IRA. My thinking is the gain portion that is subject to taxes will be easy to determine.
Sorry for the thread hi-jack. I realize this has very little to do with Wellstrade aside from the fact that they discourage people from having multiple tradl IRAs with them. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
LH2004

Joined: 27 Mar 2007 Posts: 1745 Location: New York, NY
|
Posted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 2:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Sammy_M wrote: | A few years ago I rolled out the 100% deductible contributions from my former employer's 401k to a Rollover IRA. I have no plans to convert this money to a Roth...so I plan to roll it to my newly formed SE401k, sometime before 2010.
Last year I started a non-deductible IRA. In 2010 (assuming tax code isn't changed by then) I'm planning to convert this to Roth IRA. My thinking is the gain portion that is subject to taxes will be easy to determine. | That works, as long as the cumulative returns to the non-deductible IRA are positive. (If it has lost money, you can't roll over the entire other IRA.) But it means rolling over less money than you're entitled to, so converting more, and paying some tax. Now, of course, lots of people convert pretax money on purpose (and 2010, with the special 2-year deferral, is an especially good time), so that's not necessarily dumb, but if you're planning to roll over the other IRA, I assume it's because you want to convert as little pretax money in 2010 as possible; in that case, you should calculate the amount of the conversion that would be taxable under your method, and increase your rollover by that much, making the conversion 100% tax-free. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|